And history shows that such periods can be the worst for investors to navigate – especially when they follow a record stock-market run, such as the all-time-highs that U.S. share prices reached last fall.

In the United States, for instance, Dow Jones Industrial Average hit 381 on Sept. 3, 1929, a record pinnacle achieved in advance of both the Great Crash and the Great Depression that followed – and a level that wouldn’t be eclipsed again until November 1954 – more than 25 years later.

From the Great Crash, fast-forward 60 years, to 1989 Japan. On Dec. 29 of that year, the Nikkei 225 Index topped out at 38,957.44, before closing at 38,915.87. By the following September, stock prices had nearly been halved – and there was still much more bloodletting to go. (Despite several subsequent rallies up over the 20,000 threshold, the Nikkei ultimately bottomed at 7,830 in April 2003. It closed yesterday – Thursday – at 12,887.95, still down 67% from its trading high 19 years ago).

The fallout from Japan’s slow motion, stock-and-real-estate-market meltdowns was incredible. By early 2004, Japanese houses were selling at 1/10th their peak value, and commercial real estate was selling for less than 1/100th of its record highs. All told, an estimated $20 trillion in stock and real estate wealth was vaporized (although one could easily argue that the peak values weren’t real to start with).

That’s scary stuff, especially because many experts fear the U.S. version of the Lost Decade that’s to follow could be much worse. After all, the U.S. financial crisis is much, much bigger, and the resultant malaise is arguably going to take much longer to work through.

Let’s look at some of the some of the profit plays that will allow investors to sidestep a long U.S. slumber – and profit just the same.

1. Miss the Market Meltdown: The Dow closed at an all-time record high of 14,164.53 on Oct. 9 of last year. With yesterday’s 207-point rally, the Dow closed at 11,446.66 – leaving the 30-stock blue-chip index down 19% from the October record, leaving it right on the doorstep of a bear market.

But what if things were to get much worse? For the Dow to match the Nikkei’s wrenching decline of 67%, it would have to drop all the way down to 4,574.29 – an area it hasn’t seen since the first half of the 1990s.

Will the Dow drop that much? Probably not.

But it doesn’t hurt to hedge. That brings me to a key point: There’s a big difference between “diversification,” which most individual investors equate with “protection,” and actual “hedging,” which is part of an investment-protection package that professional traders employ. If we believe a market poised for a real fall, we want to hedge and find an investment that’s going to go up in value while everything else is going down.

For us, that investment is the Rydex Inverse S&P 500 Strategy Fund (RYURX). RYDEX URSA is a so-called “inverse fund” that’s designed to profit as the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index declines in value. In that way, it complements our other holdings by providing some portfolio stability.

As Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald says, hedging is such a compelling strategy because financial studies demonstrate that “even though broad sections of the markets may decline over time and our portfolios with it, we need only have a small section permanently hedged at any given time. The reason is that, by having a small portion of our assets (5%-10% or less) earning above-average returns, our overall returns are far higher over time.”

2. Gold Isn’t Just for Hedging Anymore: Mention the word “stagflation” to anyone who worked and invested during the 1970s, and I’ll bet you’ll actually see that person physically shudder at the memory. Stagflation – the double-whammy combination of stagnant economic growth and high inflation – was thought to be an impossibility, until it showed up during that decade, leaving ruin in its wake.

But for our purposes, no matter whether we’re looking at stagflation or inflation, one thing is clear – we’re looking at higher prices. And when prices are on the upswing, gold is the one investment you certainly want to own.

Then there’s also the whole “Lost Decade” outlook for the U.S. economy. In a misguided attempt to slowly deflate the asset bubbles it created with a years of overly expansive monetary policies, the U.S. Federal Reserve is now keeping interest rates at artificially low levels – gambling it will still be able to launch a successful counterattack on inflation later on. What’s more, the central bank also has made the ill-fated decision to diversify into the “bailout business” with its intervention in the Bear Stearns Cos. (BSC) and Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) debacles.

The artificially low interest rates will continue to punish the U.S. greenback, sending it lower and causing inflation to accelerate. And the trillions in debt the U.S. government’s balance sheet will take on from the Fannie and Freddie bailouts certainly won’t help.

In addition to the bleak-sounding inflation-case for gold, there’s also what I like to call the “wealth case” for the “yellow metal.” As the consumer classes in China, India, Latin America and Emerging Europe grow in both breadth and depth, their ability to buy luxury goods will finally intersect with their desire. And gold will be a major beneficiary.

But how best to play it? There are mining companies, bullion, coins and even jewelry. Everybody has his or her preferences for gold investments, including us. We prefer the SPDR Gold Trust Exchange Traded Fund (GLD). There’s no delivery risk, it’s liquid, and you can buy and sell easily through any online brokerage.

Sanyo said it started procuring the display panels from Sharp in April, and would use them for the LCD TVs it’s producing for the North American market. And while Sanyo said it will keep buying LCD panels from other suppliers, too, the company also said that it’s in talks with Sharp about a program in which the two would jointly develop a line of kitchen appliances.

With its consumer-electronics business struggling, Sanyo has refocused itself strategically, betting its future on solar cells and rechargeable batteries, Reuters reported.

“We hope to expand our business by having a mutually complementary relationship with Sharp,” Sanyo spokeswoman Yuko Hosaka told Reuters. “Sharp’s strength in LCD [panels] is part of that.”

Sanyo sold about 1 million LCD TVs in North America in the business year that ended March 31.

Sharp’s Growing List of LCD Disciples

Sharp, which markets the Aquos line of LCD TVs, is the world’s third-largest maker of the flat-panel televisions, trailing South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (PINK: SSNLF) and Japanese consumer-electronics giant Sony Corp. (ADR: SNE). But Sharp has been trying to boost its market position and establish a consistent market for its LCD panels among rival flat-panel TV producers even as it invests to elevate its own productive capacity, Reuters reported.

As Money Morning reported back in February, Sony agreed to take a one-third stake in a $3.5 billion LCD plant that Sharp is building in Japan to meet the soaring worldwide demand for flat-screen television sets.

It plans to transform the LCD plant – which would be the world’s largest – into a joint venture: The Osaka-based Sharp will take a 66% stake, while Sony will take the remaining 34%.

While the companies would not say how much Sony would invest for its stake, Japan’s Nikkei newspaper said that Sony agreed to pony up $926 million, Bloomberg News reported. The factory will start production by March 2010.

While Samsung, Sony and Sharp rank one, two and three on the list of the world’s largest makers of LCD TVs, Japan’s Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. – maker of the Panasonic brand – controls one-third of the plasma TV market.

Sanyo joins Sony, Toshiba Corp. (OTC: TOSBF) and Pioneer Corp (PINK: PNCOF) as companies that have all said that they plan to buy LCD panels from Sharp. But the Sony-Sharp alliance is an especially aggressive example of the linkups taking place among Japan’s flat-panel TV producers.

If it seems odd to have competitors buying and selling such a key component as an LCD screen, consider the challenges Sharp and its rivals face:

• They need to have a big-enough supply of the liquid-crystal display (LCD) panels to meet the accelerating demand.
• But these companies also need to keep their capital investments low at a time when flat panel displays are becoming a commodity, meaning the actual component prices can be expected to undergo the same steep declines as computer memory chips or memory drives.

In the face of burgeoning demand and tight supplies for LCD panels, companies are choosing different routes to fill their needs. Late last year, Toshiba decided to buy LCD panels from Sharp. But earlier this month, Panasonic-maker Matsushita said it would spend $2.8 billion to build an LCD plant of its own.

“Sony needed an extra source of panels because the large-size LCD TV market is growing faster than it had expected. As Sony expands TV production, it is natural to seek to diversify panel sources,” Park Hyun, an analyst at Prudential Investment & Securities, said during a recent interview. “Sony is likely to continue the partnership with Samsung … therefore Sony’s diversification strategy won’t have a negative implication for
the alliance with Samsung.”

For Sharp, the linkup with Sony serves as a hedge at a time when aggressive industry investments in panel-production capacity is boosting worries about a supply glut down the road.

“The problem will be 2010 and 2011,” said Shinko Securities Co. Ltd. (PINK: SKSTF) analyst Hideki Watanabe. “Just when TV demand is likely peaking, Sharp’s 10th-generation plant will come on-stream, and so will Matsushita’s new factory [causing the potential glut. But this] deal gives Sharp good risk hedging.”

The new Sharp-Sony factory would utilize the so-called “10th-generation” glass substrates, which can yield more panels than earlier-generation, smaller glass substrates, improving production efficiency and helping both Sharp and Sony offer flat-panel TVs at competitive market prices.

The new factory will produce LCD screens that have a diagonal reach of as much as 60 inches. Sony will receive a third of the factory’s output, with the rest going to Sharp. Initially, the monthly output will be 36,000 glass substrates, although the ultimate monthly output will reach 72,000 glass substrates.

The substrates are the output from which the flat panels can be cut.

Besides the flat-TV panels, the factory will also make so-called “LCD Modules,” which are flat-panel displays equipped with such components as a backlight unit and LCD driver chips.

“For Sharp, this is a positive step since it means a major buyer that would keep the 10th-generation factory busy,” Kazuharu Miura, a Daiwa Institute of Research analyst, told Reuters.

The venture reduces Sony’s reliance on Samsung – currently its main supplier – at a time when LCD TV sales are projected to rise 29% this year, easily outpacing demand growth for rivaling plasma-based TV sets. Both UBS AG (UBS) and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEH) predict that the LCD shortage will persist throughout the year.

Worldwide sales of LCD TV are expected to reach 155 million units by 2012, double the 74.8 million sold in 2007, predicts the Japan Electronics and Information Technology Association. Demand for plasma TVs will likely reach 25 million units in 2012, 119% more than the 11.4 million sold last year, the JEITA said.

Sony is expecting to sell 10 million of its Bravia LCD TVs in the current fiscal year, which ends March 31. The suggested list price of the TVs range from about $500 to $1,600, according to the Sony Web site.

The company also has a second LCD joint venture – this one with Samsung – known as S-LCD.

Based on my 20 years of experience in the region and formal academic study, you can believe me when I say that this may well be the most pivotal event in 20 centuries of Sino-Japanese relations.

We’ve reported some of this to you already. But the mainstream Western press hasn’t latched on to it.

That’s not to say they haven’t reported what happened when Japanese Prime Minister Yauo Fukuda hosted Chinese President Hu Jintao during the historic summit the two held in Tokyo last month – the press reported everything that “happened,” and did so exceptionally well.

However, like so many things in Asia, mainstream journalists completely missed the subtleties and, not surprisingly, that’s where the real story usually is.

But you’ve got to know how to read between the lines to get at the “real” meaning of what was said.

Here’s why.

When translating both Chinese and Japanese to English, there are both literal and figurative translations to consider. Frequently, inexperienced commentators (and even experienced ones) will provide one without the other.

And that’s too bad, because it’s the context that’s “everything” in Asia – and I mean that literally.

Unlike Western romance languages – which descended from the resconstructible Proto-Indo-European language family, and which are logically oriented – Chinese languages are commonly believed to have descended from the Proto-Sino-Tibetan family while Japanese is understood to have come from a context-driven lexical borrowing process in the region.

As a result, Western languages are frequently blunt and to the point, while both the Japanese and Chinese languages historically rely heavily on context and symbolism: In other words, the “real” meaning is not the words, but is instead found in the symbolism associated with those words.

And that’s not exactly something you can explain in a 10-second CNN sound bite, so most news stations don’t bother.

For instance, during their historic five-day Summit last month in Japan, Prime Minister Fukuda and China President Hu agreed to make 2008 a year for boosting their nation’s “mutually beneficial relationship.”

I was sitting in Kyoto when I heard that, and I was stunned. I’ve spent two decades studying, living in and working in Asia, and in all that time I couldn’t recall any of the prior leaders of the two countries ever sharing a more-direct, more-powerful statement. And neither could the Chinese and Japanese I spoke with that day because the words represents the single most important thaw yet verbalized in the decades old animosity dating back to World War II.

While most Westerners expected them to “settle affairs” by making some reference to historical events that have badly strained bi-lateral relations in recent years, both leaders deliberately avoided doing anything like that during their five-day meeting. And, by doing so, each side was able to state his case to the other’s countrymen without “losing face,” which is pivotally important to both countries and cultures.

Similarly, President Hu’s remarks that he’s looking forward to a “warm spring” between the two countries were translated quite literally by the Western media, although the comment had an entirely different meaning to Asians. To Asians, the comment is symptomatic of far deeper, and more intimate, nationalist feelings on a variety of personal and state levels.

By stating his desire for a “warm spring,” President Hu was making an allegorical reference to the importance of producing a bountiful rice harvest. And the reason why this makes sense to Asians is that rice has been pivotally important to both cultures for a millennium or more. That crop has enabled both cultures to make the transition from hunter-gathers to farmer, and it is also central to religious and social festivals in both countries, as it has been for thousands of years.

By referencing rice farming, President Hu was very deliberately reaching deep down into the core of both nations and sending an important message to millions of Japanese and Chinese citizens that China is ready to put the past to rest and look to the future.

In a more Western fashion, the two leaders also agreed that “long-term cooperation for peace and friendship” is the “only choice left” for both countries. This, too, is full of hidden meaning: It’s an unprecedented signal that both nations are preparing to (finally) put the horrific events – and the long-lingering bad feelings – of WWII behind them.

By putting this rancor to rest, each country will now be free to make major investments in the other’s economy – much more so than they’re doing even now.

If history is any guide, then some of the most significant Sino-Japanese trends of the future are likely to begin at the intersections of companies just now starting to flourish.

Of course, there will be course corrections along the way, but that didn’t hurt relations 20 centuries ago when Japan and China were very close – and those corrections won’t hurt them, now.

The important thing is to embrace change as it occurs.

For investors, one of the biggest profit opportunities will be with companies that are helping China build out its infrastructure and build up its consumer sector, which is why such companies as solar-ceramics maker Kyocera Corp. (ADR: KYO), and trading giant and independent power plant developer Mitsui & Co. Ltd. (ADR: MITSY), are logical choices.

In addition to seeing Japanese companies like these focusing their sights on the China market, we’re likely to see Chinese companies doing the same with Japan. While it’s not yet clear who those companies will be, it is clear to us that the initial entrée will likely be from one or more of China’s sovereign wealth funds.

Our best guess is that China investors will prefer key targets like those traded on the Tokyo Stock Exchange – especially companies that have an expertise in environmental protection and energy-saving technologies.

We also think China will make a run at construction companies with experience in large-scale infrastructure and national-building projects – all of which are in exceptionally high demand in China.

Source: The Subtle Dealings Between China and Japan Can Lead to Powerful Profits

My wife’s family has been coming here for centuries, making it a familiar and comfortable place that we enjoy very much.

It’s also a spot that tends to put things into perspective – like the Bank of Japan’s recent decision to keep its key interest rate at 0.5%.

So why is this move by Japan’s central bank important? That’s easy.

We’ve been hearing for years how the Japanese economy is poised for a recovery. And each New Year is supposed to be “the” year – yet it just somehow never seems to happen – at least according to folks who don’t spend as much time here as I do.

Sure Japan went to hell and back during the “Lost Decade” that stretched from 1990 – 2000, but this country’s economy is recovering – even if the securities markets don’t yet reflect this: They’re up only marginally so far this year.

But that speaks volumes about what investors should expect when thinking about Japan. For instance, the beautiful young elevator ladies who used to grace Japan’s top department stores have vanished. Yet, individual customer service remains better than ever.

Many of the so-called boutique shops have also faded into the sunset. But those shops have been replaced by multi-sale retailers and Internet shops, all of which are going great guns.

This suggests companies are becoming more cash sensitive even as they’re becoming more aggressive. So are Japanese consumers. It’s a trend that’s moving Japan along quietly, if steadily.

But what’s really interesting to me after having spent 20 years in and out of Japan is the number of students who now are studying Chinese, as well as English.

Like the Japanese companies and consumers that are driving the “stealth recovery” here, students who want to get ahead are doing all they can to learn more about their neighbor, including the language.

They understand that they have to look beyond the labels that say “Made in China,” and consider the growing Chinese consumer class – especially China’s emerging middle class, which is already 325 million strong.

While some experts claim that the two nations, Japan and China, will never be friends because of World War II era animosity, those with a far longer perspective acknowledge that the two actually were very close – centuries ago. Much of Japan’s writing system, religious roots and even early architecture came directly from China’s royal courts more than 1000 years ago.

The two nations will be close again.

The best way investors can capitalize on this eventuality is not to buy the broader Japanese indices. Those will merely pick up the has-beens, wannabes and never-wases. It’s far better to concentrate on those companies that are already working closely with China.

The companies in this category firmly understand the regional dynamics at play today. But, more importantly, they understand just what the future is going to look like, and are already preparing for business dealings with China – and the Chinese consumer.

Some great choices if you want to cash in include solar-ceramics maker Kyocera Corp. (ADR: KYO), trading giant and independent power plant developer Mitsui & Co. Ltd. (ADR: MITSY), and even Toyota Motor Co. (ADR: TM), which is now the world’s No. 1 automaker, and (as Money Morning just reported) also has branched out into commercial jetliners.

Since I’m scheduled to head back down the mountain shortly, I’m going to close this out (yes, for those of you who are wondering, I really am writing on my laptop thousands of feet above Kyoto) so that I can check in on the summit between Chinese President Hu Jintao and Japanese Prime Minister Yauo Fukuda.

It’s the first visit by a Chinese head of state in a decade.

I’ll have more to say about that visit in the days to come. And I’ll be returning to the United States fairly soon, too. I’ll keep you posted.

Source: Japan’s ‘Lost Decade’ Has Given Way to the New Asian Reality