<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; Loan Guarantees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/loan-guarantees/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why ‘Bailout Purgatory’ Is Bad for Everybody</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-%e2%80%98bailout-purgatory%e2%80%99-is-bad-for-everybody/16253</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-%e2%80%98bailout-purgatory%e2%80%99-is-bad-for-everybody/16253#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes From the Investment Underground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backed Securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Injections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loan Guarantees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Banking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bailout purgatory is bad for everybody, apart from the banks, their shareholders and their unsecured creditors. As Roubini points out, the government has been siphoning money into banks via capital injections, loan guarantees and financing with no strings attached.<br />
For example, despite being in receipt of billions of dollars of taxpayer-funded bailouts, banks have only marginally cut dividends since the crisis began. This means bailout funds have being going in one door and out the other (much like the flow of bank executives into government and back to banks again). Banks have paid out a whopping $400 to $500 billion in dividends in 2007 and 2008.<br />
There are also reports that <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AC">Citi </a>and <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC">BoA </a>have been buying back AAA-tranches of non-prime mortgages-backed&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bailout purgatory is bad for everybody, apart from the banks, their shareholders and their unsecured creditors. As Roubini points out, the government has been siphoning money into banks via capital injections, loan guarantees and financing with no strings attached.<span id="more-16253"></span><br />
For example, despite being in receipt of billions of dollars of taxpayer-funded bailouts, banks have only marginally cut dividends since the crisis began. This means bailout funds have being going in one door and out the other (much like the flow of bank executives into government and back to banks again). Banks have paid out a whopping $400 to $500 billion in dividends in 2007 and 2008.<br />
There are also reports that <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AC">Citi </a>and <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC">BoA </a>have been buying back AAA-tranches of non-prime mortgages-backed securities: the very same junk the government is trying to remove from their books via the PPIP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-%e2%80%98bailout-purgatory%e2%80%99-is-bad-for-everybody/16253/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed May Cut Rates Again as Policymakers Meet</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-may-cut-rates-again-as-policymakers-meet/10066</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-may-cut-rates-again-as-policymakers-meet/10066#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOWM SNE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Funds Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loan Guarantees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=10066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After U.S. Federal Reserve policymakers meet today (Monday) and tomorrow (Tuesday), most experts expect a half a percentage point cut in the benchmark Federal Funds Rate – which is already 1.0%.</p>
<p>That  doesn’t leave members of the central bank’s policymaking Federal Open Market  Committee (FOMC) <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/fed-rate-cut-2/" target="_blank">much room to  maneuver</a>. Still, the policymakers may have more ammunition in their arsenal and the statement that accompanies the rate decision at the end of the two-day session could shed some insight on the “creative” actions the Fed could consider in addition to rate cuts (For instance, the central bank could extend the new investment firm discount window, offer additional loan guarantees, or utilize any number of other tools).</p>
<p>And  the Fed may well have to&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After U.S. Federal Reserve policymakers meet today (Monday) and tomorrow (Tuesday), most experts expect a half a percentage point cut in the benchmark Federal Funds Rate – which is already 1.0%.<span id="more-10066"></span></p>
<p>That  doesn’t leave members of the central bank’s policymaking Federal Open Market  Committee (FOMC) <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/fed-rate-cut-2/" target="_blank">much room to  maneuver</a>. Still, the policymakers may have more ammunition in their arsenal and the statement that accompanies the rate decision at the end of the two-day session could shed some insight on the “creative” actions the Fed could consider in addition to rate cuts (For instance, the central bank could extend the new investment firm discount window, offer additional loan guarantees, or utilize any number of other tools).</p>
<p>And  the Fed may well have to use those other tools. As Japan’s “<a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm" target="_blank">Lost  Decade</a>” demonstrated, “zero” interest rates won’t necessarily jump-start an economy – especially when interest rates weren’t really the problem. And as several <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a></em></strong> investigative pieces have demonstrated, the low  interest rates aren’t necessarily inducing banks to lend. Indeed, many <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/05/banking-buyouts/" target="_blank">banks are using  the federal bailout money to finance buyout deals</a>.</p>
<p>The ministers  of the <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/12/14/opecs_khelil_a_pragmatic_leader_in_testing_times/" target="_blank">Organization  of the Petroleum Exporting Countries</a> (OPEC) will meet in Algeria on Wednesday  and President <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/12/14/opecs_khelil_a_pragmatic_leader_in_testing_times/" target="_blank">Chakib  Khelil</a> implied that a surprisingly sizable production cut is in the cards.  While OPEC controls about 40% of the world’s oil supplies, energy analysts hold more stock in actions rather than words. Said one of those analysts: “You can announce all the cuts you want. Compliance is the key.&#8221;</p>
<h3><strong>Market  Matters </strong></h3>
<p>In a major story last week, <strong>Bank of America</strong> Corp. (BAC) may be  eliminating 35,000 jobs as it adds <strong>Merrill  Lynch</strong> <strong>&amp; Co. Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer" target="_blank">MER</a>) to its ever-growing list  of subsidiary companies.</p>
<p>But in an even bigger story, Wall Street powerbroker, Bernard Madoff stole the headlines (and about $50 billion from investors in the process).  This former chairman of the Nasdaq Stock Market Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ndaq" target="_blank">NDAQ</a>) ASDAQ was arrested  for committing perhaps the largest investor fraud in history (<strong>Enron</strong> may be off the hook) as <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=2320522" target="_blank">Bernard L Madoff  Investment Securities LLC</a><strong> </strong>appears to have been “basically a giant <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme" target="_blank">Ponzi</a> scheme” (his own words).  Though the client list seemed relatively small, at first, the implications will be quite widespread, as some of the largest hedge funds of funds participated in Madoff’s investments; their clients include some of the world’s (formerly) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/sports/baseball/14wilpon.html?em" target="_blank">wealthiest  folks</a>.  Additionally, regulators will have quite a few questions to answer as lax oversight failed to uncover this massive fraud that may have been perpetrated for years.  Stay tuned – this one isn’t going away any time soon.</p>
<p>In “lighter” news, the U.S. House of Representative passed a “preliminary” auto bailout package that would provide $14 billion to the Big Three – <strong>Ford Motor  Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=f" target="_blank">F</a>) </strong>may not need  any for now – and create a new <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/big-three-bailout-2/" target="_blank">car czar</a> to oversee an industry restructuring.  While Wall Street initially hailed the move as a positive step to a necessary overhaul, the Senate demanded greater concessions from auto unions and the bill became basically “dead on arrival.”  Since the U.S. Treasury Department appears to be growing more comfortable with the bailout concept with each passing day, Bush administration officials implied that aid via the $700 billion <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Emergency_Economic_Stabilization_fund" target="_blank">Troubled Assets Relief Program</a> (TARP) would be forthcoming even without Senate approval. By the way, an oversight committee gave the financial bailout a rather poor initial report card, claiming a lack of transparency in terms of how dollars are being spent and whether recipients are complying with government intentions (no wonder the automakers want to participate as well).</p>
<p>Elsewhere, Merrill’s <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=MER.N&amp;officerId=1072250" target="_blank">John  A. Thain</a> reversed an earlier position by “choosing” to forgo his 2008 bonus  and <strong>Morgan Stanley’s (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=MS" target="_blank">MS</a>)</strong> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=MS.N&amp;officerId=21139" target="_blank">John  J. Mack</a> quickly followed suit.  The <strong>Dow Chemical Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ADOW" target="_blank">DOW</a>)</strong>, <strong>Sony Corp. (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASNE" target="_blank">SNE</a>),</strong> and <strong>3M Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mmm" target="_blank">MMM</a>) </strong>joined BofA and  others in announcing sizable job cuts.  <strong>FedEx Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=FDX" target="_blank">FDX</a>) </strong>and The <strong>Procter &amp; Gamble</strong> <strong>Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=PG" target="_blank">PG</a>)</strong> reduced prior  outlooks and sales projections.</p>
<p>Oil prices fluctuated greatly as  traders weighed contrasting supply/demand reports:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The Energy Information Administration expects weak demand to result in declining consumption through 2009 even as significant production cuts could be announced at the upcoming OPEC meeting.</li>
<li>With oil trading below $47 a barrel, <strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=GS" target="_blank">GS</a>) </strong>(of “we’re going to $200/barrel fame”) contradicted past forecasts by claiming prices could fall to $30 (and lost some credibility in the process).</li>
</ul>
<p>Stocks reacted favorably to rumors of President-elect Barack Obama’s $500+ billion stimulus package (see below) and the apparent progress with automaker negotiations.  As the week moved on, reports of new job losses and more financial woes halted the brief optimism and the Senate’s inability to pass an auto bill brought more excessive volatility.  A “flight-to-quality” sentiment contributed to yields on 3-month T-bills dipping to 0.0% (that’s ZERO percent … talk about risk averse).</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="455" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2007)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (09/30/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(12/05/08)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(12/12/08)</strong></td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">13,264.82</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">10,850.66</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,635.42</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>8,629.68</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-34.94%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,652.28</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,091.88</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,509.31</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>1,540.72</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-41.91%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,468.36</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,164.74</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">876.07</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>879.73</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-40.09%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">766.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">679.58</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">461.09</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>468.43</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-38.85%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">4.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.00%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1.00%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>1.00%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-325 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">4.04%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.83%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.66%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>2.59%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-145 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Economically Speaking</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;I am absolutely confident that if we take the right steps over the coming months, that not only can we get the economy back on track, but we can emerge leaner, meaner and ultimately more competitive and more prosperous.&#8221;</p>
<p>Somehow an economic stimulus plan which directs $500+ billion into new FDR-like public works programs to increase employment does not necessarily imply “leaner and meaner.”  Still, many analysts believe the <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/obama-stimulus/" target="_blank">Obama plan</a> (still in its infancy) may be just the tonic needed to jumpstart the  economy.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the European Union announced its own $200 billion package as the 27 member countries struggle with global recession.  Not to be outdone, Japan revealed some sizable stimulus measures of its own late in the week.  With the recession already pushing a year in duration, Duke University released results of its Global Business Outlook Survey which showed that 60% of domestic CFOs believe the downturn will last until the 4th quarter of next year – and perhaps longer. Similarly, a<br />
Wall Street Journal forecasting survey predicted four straight quarters of negative growth as measured by gross domestic product, or GDP, the longest period of economic contraction since the Great Depression.</p>
<p>A light week on the economic calendar ended with a couple of major reports that gave the Fed a bit more anecdotal material to (over-)analyze prior to the FOMC meeting today and tomorrow. With claims for unemployment benefits soaring to their highest level since November 1982, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and friends must make job creation among their top priorities.  November retail sales fell by 1.8% as automakers reported their worst level of monthly activity in 26 years.</p>
<p>Still, the decline was less than Wall Street expected, leading Morgan Stanley’s analysts to speculate about future downward revisions.  Wholesale inflation (as measured by the producer price index, or PPI) declined by 2.2% as gasoline prices plummeted by 25% in November.  Normally, consumers would welcome such news and gladly spend those savings from the pumps at the malls during the holidays.  Instead economists continue to spread more “gloom and doom” by suggesting consumers may hoard their savings and resist spending amid these uncertain times.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic  Calendar </strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="476" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="149" valign="top"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="252" valign="top"><strong>Comments </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 11</td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Initial Jobless Claims (12/06)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top">Highest level    of claims in 26 years</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Balance of Trade (10/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top">Surprising increase on surge in    oil imports</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 12</td>
<td width="149" valign="top">PPI (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top">25+% drop in gas prices led to    2.2% overall decline</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Retail Sales (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top">A record 5th    consecutive monthly decline</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="149" valign="top"><strong></strong></td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 15</td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Industrial Production (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 16</td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Housing Starts (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="149" valign="top">CPI (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Fed Policy Meeting Statement</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 18</td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Initial Jobless Claims (12/13)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Leading Eco Indicators (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/15/fed-interest-rate/">Fed May Cut  Rates Again as Policymakers Meet</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-may-cut-rates-again-as-policymakers-meet/10066/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.301 seconds -->

