Jeff Clark (Casey Research):

In the short term, a catastrophic deflation is quite possible. But in the long term, extremely high levels of inflation are now inevitable. The situation is very serious. Gold is the best hedge against both of these things. The better part of your financial assets should be in gold, augmented by well-thought-out speculations. Doug Casey, November, 2009.

Doug Casey and the editors at Casey Research are very skeptical that we are experiencing any sort of economic recovery. In our opinion, too many economic indicators are based on faulty data and optimistic assumptions. Our research suggests that a recovery isn’t sustainable yet. And with that, we lack the foundation needed to support the rapidly rising stock markets.

Among the many reasons for our doubt is this standout:

Over the next two years, the so-called Alt-A and Option ARM loans face massive resets. Even with today’s low mortgage interest rates, most of these home loans, currently enjoying ultra-low teaser rates or pick-your-own-monthly-payment schemes, will see their monthly payments adjust higher – far higher. The result: loan losses and write-downs will balloon for banks, and mortgage holders will get hit with another wave of homeowner defaults. We just don’t see any way for the economy and markets to escape the fallout.

Even the Fed’s perpetual public smiley face can’t hide what’s happening. In their own statement last month, they said, “Household spending appears to be expanding but remains constrained by ongoing job losses, sluggish income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit.” A clear and present danger remains in the system.

What does this mean for our favorite sector? Following the market lows in March, gold and gold stocks have, with some exceptions, mirrored the market’s moves both up and down. If the markets correct again, whether mild or severe, gold and gold stocks could get taken down as well.

There will come a point when gold stocks separate from the movements of the general markets, and we look forward to that day. But for now they’re still holding hands.

In the meantime, our view of the big-picture outlook hasn’t changed. Rising inflation and a falling dollar are baked in the cake. Price inflation follows monetary inflation, and governments around the globe have pursued an unprecedented and unsustainable policy of inflating the money supply. Monetary inflation + time = price inflation. It’ll come, and when it does, it will wipe out those who are unprepared.

But in the near term, current economic uncertainties mean heightened risk and call for caution. In other words, this isn’t the time to be aggressive with stock purchases.

So, how does one invest in this kind of environment? Is there a way to hedge your exposure against price fluctuations?

Yes! The secret lies in asset allocation.

Achieving good portfolio performance is possible without overexposing yourself to stocks. The strategy involves playing defense as well as offense.

The following tables compare the returns an investor could expect using different asset allocation models under three hypothetical market scenarios, and assumes a starting portfolio of $10,000.

      *All returns exclude commissions and taxes 

      *Cash return for 1 year of 1.55% based on use of money market account; higher rate possible with a CD, but access to your cash is restricted, and it involves fees and penalties for early withdrawal.

You can see that you’re giving up only 6.6% in gains in Scenario #1 by apportioning your portfolio in equal thirds vs. being overweight stocks. But if stocks decline while you’re overweight that category, as shown in Scenario #2, you stand to lose 16.8%.

If you don’t elect a defensively positioned portfolio at this point, and gold stocks indeed get sucked into the vortex of a general market sell-off, you’ll wish you had that extra $2,300 in cash – which buys well over 100 shares of Kinross at today’s price. And when KGC likely doubles in a couple years, as we expect, remorse may be knocking on your door.

By allocating your investments in a more defensive mode, you’re making a small sacrifice for possible profits over the next six months without sacrificing long-term returns.

You can continue to follow the thinking of the editors at Casey Research — and get specific recommendations for solid, secure gold investments — with an inexpensive subscription to Casey’s Gold and Resource Report. It comes with a free report called The Three Best Ways to Invest in Gold, and until December 18, you’ll get a free subscription to Casey’s Energy Opportunities — all for only $39. Click here to find out more.

But there’s now another problem looming – one that could ultimately weigh down the global financial system.

The problem: Europe’s banks.

As economies slow in other parts of the world, rising joblessness and plunging housing prices and escalating loan losses are putting banks under pressure. That’s especially true in Europe, where consumers and companies are continuing to run into trouble.

Royal Bank of Scotland PLC (NYSE ADR: RBS), now 70% state-owned, fell to a loss in the first quarter and wrote down $3.17 billion in risky assets after its bad debts quadrupled to $4.37 billion.

Bank executives “[expect] a slowdown in financial-market activity compared with the very buoyant conditions seen in Q1,” Chief Executive Officer Stephen Hester told Reuters.

In Germany, Commerzbank AG (OTC ADR: CRZBY) had to take a $1.61 billion charge from its investment bank and a $72.38 million charge from commercial real estate initiatives, resulting in a $1.2 billion loss for the quarter.

In late December, the Institute of International Finance released its global economic outlook for 2009, and estimated that banks around the world had collectively lost nearly $1 trillion – $678 billion from U.S. banks and $300 billion from their European counterparts.

That was in December. We know it got worse – a lot worse – for U.S. banks after that point. Thanks to a mix that included lots of government bailout and an injection of new capital from investors, U.S. banks have experienced an improvement in their outlook.

Indeed, U.S. Federal Researve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke stated that the banks tested are all solvent and the results should provide “considerable comfort about the health of the banking system.”

But in the five months since that Institute of International Finance report was issued, it’s  likely that European banks have experienced a major decline in their fortunes.

Last week’s release of the bank stress tests results removed significant uncertainty about the U.S. banks, since it created a blueprint of what the troubled institutions needed to do to stabilize their finances. Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) and Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC) have announced plans to raise an aggregate $15 billion in capital. Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) plans to sell assets and issue more common stock after being told by the federal government that it must raise $33.9 billion to adequately guard against “more adverse” economic conditions.

Bank of America was one of 10 banks told by the government to raise more capital following the so-called stress test. The government concluded that BofA faces a potential $136.6 billion in losses from troubled loans and investments in 2009 and 2010. The bank’s $34 billion capital shortfall was more than twice that of Wells Fargo, which had the second greatest capital need.
Are we destined to see this all play out now in Europe?

Market Matters

Shifting back to autos, General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) lost $6 billion in the first quarter and is shopping Saturn to Renault SA of France as it moves closer to its restructuring deadline (and potential bankruptcy). China’s Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. (PINK: GELYF) has interest in GM’s Saab unit, and Fiat SpA (OTC ADR: FIATY) may look to complement its Chrysler LLC line with the German Opel (also late of GM).  Meanwhile, Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) claims to be on track with its restructuring plan and still believes it can manage just fine without any government assistance.  On the earnings’ front, The Walt Disney Co. (NYSE: DIS) and Kraft Foods Inc. (NYSE: KFT) bested estimates, while Cisco offered some mixed results as its better than expected numbers actually prompted some profit-taking among techs.

A poorly received 30-year Treasury auction sent bond prices tumbling as fixed income investors focused on the massive programs the government will need to finance over the next few years.  Oil prices surged above $58 a barrel for the first time in six months as traders seemingly failed to consider rising inventory levels and instead bought on signs (feeble as they are) of an economic recovery that would lead to enhanced energy demand.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index pushed beyond the crucial 900 level and ended the week in positive territory for the year.  Techs struggled late as investors realized any economic rebound would not translate into capital expenditures overnight.  Still, the Nasdaq Composite Index has outperformed the other indexes on a year-to-date basis.  With stress tests out of the way, where will the next leaks come from?

Economically Speaking

U.S. retailers released same-store sales data for April and the results were actually quite promising.  As usual, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) led the charge with a 5% increase in activity, while Children’s Place Retail Stores Inc. (Nasdaq: PLCE), Stage Stores Inc. (NYSE: SSI), Gap Inc. (NYSE: GPS), and The TJX Cos. Inc. (NYSE: TJX) were among those stores that posted better-than-expected results and beat analysts’ expectations.  A late-Easter holiday (April instead of March) helped many retailers as consumers waited until the last minute (as has become the norm) for their related holiday shopping.

On the global front, the European Central Bank dropped its key lending rate by 25 bps to 1%, and initiated other monetary moves to stabilize its (16-country) economy.  Likewise, the Bank of England announced a plan to buy up government and corporate bonds, thus, increasing its money supply.

Speaking of the labor market, the U.S. unemployment rate climbed in April to 8.9%; however, only 539,000 jobs were lost from the economy.  The contraction represented the smallest in six months and was below most analysts’ expectations.  Still, since December 2007, about 5.7 million domestic jobs have disappeared and businesses continue to be slow to hire until they see additional signs of greater stability in the economy.

Construction spending climbed in March after five consecutive monthly declines, though the gains were attributed to non-residential activity and the housing sector remains sluggish at best.  In more promising news, the National Association of Realtors reported a 3.2% increase in pending homes sales, the second straight monthly gain.  Because the release is considered a predictive indicator, analysts took it as a favorable sign that sales activity may pick up in the months ahead.

Weekly Economic Calendar

Source: Are Europe’s Banks Next to be Stressed?

Turns out Justice, who also edits Macro Trader, an extremely successful macroeconomic trading service, is as perplexed as we are by skyrocketing stock prices.
So what is this? Is it the mother of all short squeezes, as such to slay the mightiest of caught-out quant funds, making all past squeezes look positively Lilliputian in comparison?
Is it the blow-off top-of-tops, as every long-only fund manager on the planet loses his mind with fear that the great new bull market is leaving him behind, thus forcing him (or her) to buy with a frenzy reminiscent of Duke and Duke watching their fortunes evaporate in the frozen orange juice pit?
Or could it be, just might it be, the unexpectedly early beginnings of a great new inflationary phase – a paper wind-tunnel destined for the heavens, in which the trillions upon paper trillions pumped into the global economy’s backside result in worldwide equity markets that look Zimbabwe’s?
If the latter, then one might expect the Dow Jones to double – and gold to more than triple and silver to quintuple.