Unlike some stockpickers and newsletter analysts, who proudly trumpet all their winners, while shuffling the losers under the rug, I have no problem admitting when my calls go against me.

And to the delight of all the naysayers, this happened just a couple of days ago when gold prices shot to a record high. That triggered my sell-stop and, rather than let my pride come before a fall and hang on, it’s time to move on.

Don’t get me wrong, though… I’m still convinced that the yellow metal could suffer a correction for three main reasons…

• So far, inflation hasn’t reared its ugly head. If it stays in hiding much longer, disillusioned investors will probably head for the exits.
• If the U.S. economy recovers quicker than expected, investors will be inclined to abandon the safe haven of gold and reinvest in equities.
• The technicals point to a drop. The last four times gold spiked near or above $1,000 per ounce, it quickly (and sometimes precipitously) corrected.

However, giving into these convictions – and doubling down on gold – would mean abandoning two core investing disciplines that I swear by – position sizing and trailing-stops…

Have You Considered Using Trailing Stops & Position Sizing?

I know… you’ve heard about them countless times before. But indulge me for a moment, as I explain an aspect of both trailing stops and position sizing that you’ve probably never considered…

• When I speak at investment conferences, I always like to ask people to share their biggest loser. Heads go down and nary a hand rises.
• Conversely, when I ask them to share their biggest winner, it’s like I just offered free candy to an auditorium full of kindergarteners. Everyone’s hand shoots up and there’s a chorus of anxious, “Oohs!”

Nobody likes to talk about losing investments. Instead, we want to thump our chest over the latest 1,000% gainer. The reason for that is obvious, so let’s focus on the fear about talking about our losers.

Many investors turn their biggest loser into a total loss. Instead of employing a trailing-stop and exiting a trade as the price tumbles, they make it a long-term investment to save face. Or worse, they invest more at lower prices. Most times, the stock goes belly up and they lose even more.

Even the professionals can’t claim immunity here.

• For instance, take Bill Miller, the famous manager of the Legg Mason Value Trust Fund (LMVFX). Although Miller beat the S&P 500 for 15 consecutive years, he refused to man up to his mistakes when the market took a nosedive in 2008. He kept averaging down in stocks like Countrywide, Bear Stearns, Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE), Merrill Lynch, Washington Mutual (OTC:WAMUQ) and AIG.
• He revealed the true depth of his arrogance when he was asked how he knew when to stop buying a falling stock. “When we can no longer get a quote,” he replied. In other words, the only price at which he was unwilling to buy more was zero.

Here’s my point…

Avoid Losses With A Position Sizing & Trailing Stop Discipline

When I joined The Oxford Club, I immediately stopped worrying about my losses. That’s because we religiously adhere to a 25% trailing-stop discipline and a position size of no more than 4% in any one investment. Thus, losses are always contained.

The beauty of such a simple, disciplined approach is two-fold…

• The results add up, decidedly on the plus side. Case in point: The independent Hulbert Financial Digest has ranked The Oxford Club newsletter (The Communiqué) among the top five in the nation. That’s based on 10-year returns, too.
• A trailing-stop and position sizing policy allow me to keep making bold calls without regret. The bolder they are, the smaller my position size.

For instance, for my short gold call, I only invested 2%. For a hypothetical $100,000 portfolio, that means investing  $2,000 and losing $500, or less than 1% of the total portfolio value.

Bottom line: I don’t ever let an investment turn into an unacceptable loss. And I never put too many eggs in one basket. Sure I might lose 25% here or 25% there, but when I keep my position sizes small, in the grand scheme of things, it’s no big deal.

Such a strategy leaves me with plenty of capital to re-deploy and keep gunslinging. And while gold didn’t work out, some other contrarian bets are already making up for the loss and then some.

• Take Sotheby’s (NYSE: BID), for example. Back in June, I advised readers to buy shares when everyone else believed the market for investing in fine art was going into a long hibernation. The fundamentals faltered, but they didn’t collapse. As a result, Sotheby’s rallied 68% from my entry point.
• Then there’s my recommendation last Thursday to buy into the beleaguered retail sector with hhgregg (NYSE: HGG). It’s up 5.7% since then.

If I take profits on both now, my misstep by shorting gold doesn’t even matter.

The Critical Component to a Disciplined Investment Approach: Accountability

But of course, a disciplined investment approach is useless without the critical component of accountability… In terms of position sizing, there’s only one person who can keep you honest: Yourself.

But when it comes to implementing trailing-stops, multiple options exist…

• A So-So Option: Enter the stop levels with your broker. However, this is not ideal. Market makers can manipulate prices to trigger these stops.
• A Better Option: Use a service like TradeStops (www.tradestops.com). For a nominal annual fee, it will alert you via text message and/or e-mail when your stocks hit their trailing-stops.
• The Best Option: Excuse my bias, but the best value for your money is The Oxford Club. We constantly remind you about position sizing and more importantly, notify you immediately when we hit a stop-loss or trailing-stop. And our members keep each other honest.

In addition, membership also comes with a constant stream of high quality, profitable recommendations. And they make up for the occasional downer, like my short gold recommendation! To find out more, take a few minutes to read our report on how it all works.

Good investing,

Louis Basenese

Source: Two Tips to Avoid Letting a Bad Stock Sucker-Punch You

Granted, it wasn’t by much – a scant 0.7% higher than July. But it’s inevitable that consumers will eventually get back to their spending ways as this recession subsides.

And if you’re looking for a way to play it, consider hhgregg, Inc. (NYSE: HGG). Here’s why…

hhgregg, Inc: This Retailer is Bucking the Industry Trend

Based in Indianapolis, the hhgregg operates 111 retail stores selling consumer electronics and home appliances. Yes, I know that’s the same stuff you can get at your typical Best Buy (NYSE: BBY), Home Depot (NYSE: HD), or Lowe’s (NYSE: LOW).

But this company is hardly typical.

While most retailers are focused on survival, hhgregg’s in full-on attack mode. It’s not pinching pennies to stay afloat. It’s not reducing the workforce. It’s not closing underperforming stores, or mothballing expansion plans.

Instead, it’s actually ratcheting up its expansion plans and hiring by the hundreds. In fact, in the next two years, the company plans to expand its footprint by 60%.

And there’s a good reason for it…

hhgregg’s “Extraordinary Opportunity” for Growth

hhgregg’s still a regional player, with countless metropolitan markets left to enter. Plus, the fundamentals make sense…

• The typical hhgregg store generates positive free cash flow quickly, within three months of opening.
• Not to mention, the company entered the recession in much better shape than most of its competitors.
• Most notably, it wasn’t overloaded with debt. In turn, management is exploiting the drop in commercial rental rates to secure prime locations, within miles of top competitors.

President, Dennis May, says, “We have an extraordinary opportunity to gain market share by taking advantage of the current rental rates and excess availability in the real estate market.”

At the same time, the bankruptcy of a once major retailer cracked open an $11 billion opportunity…

Two Ways That hhgregg Separates Itself From the Crowd

With Circuit City having gone bust, most investors expect Best Buy to scoop up all the business. But I’m convinced hhgregg will earn its fair share too, because it distinguishes itself from big box competitors in two notable ways.

1. All Commission… All Knowing: hhgregg employs an all-commission sales staff. So if they’re content to just show up, they go hungry. They need to make sales. Thus, hhgregg’s staff tends to be older and more informed about products than the hourly, 20-somethings over at Best Buy. And with big-ticket items, consumers put a premium on superior customer service.
2. Same-Day Delivery: hhgregg offers same-day delivery on most products. Instant gratification goes a long way in attracting new customers.

To be clear, however, hhgregg is sharing in the retail pain. Same-store sales dipped 14.7% in the most recent quarter. But analysts expected worse.

The key point to remember, though, is that we never buy a stock based on the current conditions. We buy based on the future. And I’m convinced that hhgregg will be locked-and-loaded for rapid earnings growth as the economy recovers.

And the fact that shares trade at a reasonable valuation of 14 times forward earnings only makes the opportunity more compelling.

Good investing,

Louis Basenese

Source: hhgregg, Inc.: The Only Retail Stock Worth Buying Right Now

And that plays right into the hands of Medidata Solutions Inc. (Nasdaq: MDSO).

The company is a leading provider of electronic data capture (EDC) and clinical data management systems (CDMS). In laymen’s terms, it helps drug companies go from the Dark Age into the Digital Age.

And it’s a transformation that we desperately need. Here’s why…

Anyone For a Tedious, Time-Consuming Paper Trail?

Roughly 75% of all clinical trials – the most critical function of drug companies, yet also the biggest drain on resources ($45 billion, annually) – are done on paper.

That’s right. Even in today’s high-tech world, in three out of four clinical trials, information for each patient is literally recorded on pre-printed paper, specifically a case report form (CRF). Ugh.

To make matters worse, each CRF isn’t typically uploaded to the main database for weeks. And it’s entered twice and screened for inconsistencies, which, ironically, only causes more data-entry errors.

From start to finish, it’s a cumbersome and antiquated process, with data taking four months to make it from observation into a database for screening and analysis.

Obviously, such a paper-intensive process results in significant complexity and cost. It’s a process long past due for an overhaul. And that’s where Medidata comes in…

Five Benefits of “Going Digital”

The company’s flagship product, Rave, allows customers to design testing protocols, in addition to capturing, managing and reporting clinical trial data through an easy-to-use, Internet-enabled platform.

So instead of the tedious (and error-prone) pen-and-paper rituals, researchers can enter data directly into any Internet-ready computer. Bingo. No waiting.

And as you probably suspect, going digital provides notable benefits:

• The data is instantly uploaded, screened, and available for analysis and even reporting to the FDA.
• Forrester estimates that EDC reduces the cost of Phase II trials by an average of 47% and Phase III trials by 54%.
• Data entry errors plummet 93% to 3.1 errors per 1,000 data points.
• Staffing requirements drop by 18%.
• The time in which data can be recorded, verified and analyzed sinks from an average of 10 weeks to just four days.

The last point is most crucial.

A Safe Way to Fast-Track Clinical Trials

With researchers able to gain almost real-time access to data, they can monitor interim results and abort clinical trials at the first sign that a patient’s health might be at risk. It also provides mid-trial leeway to alter the parameters – like dosage – to improve overall results.

Bottom line: Having data captured electronically safely accelerates the clinical development process and maximizes the commercial life of each drug. And in the process, it dramatically cuts costs and leads to safer drugs.

So it’s no wonder the market for such products is expected to triple in size in the next three years.

And the reason I’m so bullish on Medidata is simple: It’s already capitalizing on this growth potential…

Buy Now While Wall Street Snoozes

Medidata’s net second quarter revenue jumped by 32% to $8.3 million, compared to Q2 2008. That makes Medidata the fastest growing company in the EDC space. The company also reported a profit, compared to a loss last year.

In addition, it keeps adding customers to its existing blue chip and international client base, including Switzerland-based Roche.

Of course, few investors even know the stock exists, as it only went public in June. Fewer still understand its business enough to know that healthcare reform won’t impact it.

So before the rest of Wall Street catches on, now is an ideal time to buy.

Because rest assured, Wall Street will buy. Companies tapping into under-penetrated multi-billion markets, increasing profits, with a rock-solid balance sheet ($94 million in cash) don’t fly under the radar for long.

And this one is primed for more growth. As Medidata CFO, Bruce Dalziel, explains: “As a private company for nearly a decade, we have focused on building quality solutions for our customers, a global sales and services presence and, more recently, a robust public company infrastructure. Now that the majority of this scalable infrastructure is in place, we are focused on profitable growth.”

I recommend you position your portfolio to profit as Medidata helps rid the clinical trial process of wasteful spending. It’s just too bad it can’t do the same for Washington!

Good investing,

Louis Basenese

Source: Medidata Solutions: The One Healthcare Stock That’s Not Sucking Up to Washington

I can’t say I blame them. After all, the company did make a foolish foray into the real estate lending business. And it did so at precisely the wrong time – the top of the market. In turn, like many banks, it got sacked as loan losses mounted.

At that point, forget a takeover. Bankruptcy appeared more imminent. And the stock quickly reflected this widely held belief, plunging by 95% from its 2007 high to trade below $1.

Unsurprisingly, many investors sprinted away from the company. But here’s what most of them don’t understand: Beneath the muck of E*Trade’s real estate operations, it possesses a valuable asset – its brokerage business…

For example, even during aterrible year for stocks in 2008, E*Trade (NASDAQ:ETFC) still managed to grow its account base by 6% and added $6.4 billion in customer assets.

It wasn’t a fluke either. E*Trade has continued to grow its brokerage business in 2009.

CEO, Donald Layton, sums it up: “Our online brokerage business is thriving… volumes are up versus last quarter, our average commission per trade is higher, and interest spreads are much improved.”

If it weren’t for the company’s real estate operations, shares would be soaring based on such comments. But therein lies the opportunity.

A Risk Worth Taking for E*Trade’s Rivals

With real estate operations weighing down its share price, suitors like TD Ameritrade (Nasdaq: AMTD) and Charles Schwab (Nasdaq: SCHW) can scoop up E*Trade’s most valuable asset at a steep discount. Both companies certainly possess the stability and financial resources to pull off a deal.

So what’s the holdup? Nothing… anymore.

I’m convinced that the only thing holding up a takeover is the uncertainty surrounding E*Trade’s real-estate loan portfolio. But that obstacle is quickly disappearing.

On Monday, E*Trade revealed that delinquencies continue to drop. In fact, over the past two months, delinquencies for its home-equity portfolio (its largest exposure) fell by another 7%, having fallen by 10% in the prior period.

Meanwhile, overall delinquencies remained flat, clearly indicating that E*Trade’s real-estate portfolio is stabilizing.

When we factor in all the capital the company raised to insulate itself from further losses, the risk to potential suitors appears manageable. And if suitors don’t act quickly, they’ll miss out on the opportunity to buy E*Trade’s brokerage assets at a discount. Shares have already tacked on 11% this week.

Here’s why I’m believe the situation is even more urgent for us…

Why You Should Buy E*Trade Today

A few weeks ago, E*Trade’s largest shareholder, Citadel Investment Group, scrapped plans to start unwinding its position. The move suggests a deal is in the works. Why else would the firm have such a sudden change of heart?

The rumor mill continues to heat up about the possibility of deal. And a strong uptick in call options trading adds credibility to the rumors. In fact, a Yale University study confirms that heavy spikes in options trading precede takeover announcements.

Most compelling of all, TD Ameritrade CEO, Fredric J. Tomczyk, said on Monday that he expects more consolidation to come in the industry.

Since his company is one of the most obvious buyers, he could be foreshadowing a deal. And at such an attractive price, E*Trade represents a risk worth taking for him… and us.

Bottom line: With the real estate risks subsiding, a takeover offer could come any day now for E*Trade. And if you don’t buy shares today, you might not get another chance.

Good investing,

Louis Basenese

Source: E*Trade (Nasdaq: ETFC): Why You Should Buy This Stock Before It’s Too Late

Always buy undervalued stocks and sell them when they’re overvalued. Or more commonly: “Buy low, sell high.” Of course, if you’ve invested for more than a week, you know this is easier said than done.

Undervalued (cheap) and overvalued (expensive) are such subjective measures when it comes to investing. Most times we end up guessing and most times we end up overpaying.

But today, let me show you one amazingly simple way to always buy stocks that are truly cheap…

Why America’s Most Successful Investors Buy “Low-Density” Stocks

All you have to do in order to invest like Warren Buffett, or any of America’s most successful investors – and rack up easy double-digit gains – is to buy what I call “low-density” stocks.

I define density like this: The value the market assigns to the cash that a company has in the bank.

• A high-density ratio: Means the market overvalues the cash.
• A low-density ratio: Means the market undervalues the cash.

The reason I focus on cash is straightforward: It’s the most tangible, liquid asset – and the easiest to value. After all, $1 is worth $1, so it’s easy to tell when you’re overpaying or getting a discount.

Let me use an example to make this concept crystal clear…

• Company XYZ trades for $1 per share and has $1 per share in cash (total cash divided by shares outstanding).
• To calculate the density ratio, we simply divide the price per share by the cash per share. In this case, the result is 1.

Here’s the thing, though: A one-to-one ratio is uncommon.

Most of the time, you’ll have to pay a premium for a company’s cash. Right now, for example, the density ratios for more than 480 companies in the S&P 500 are higher than 1, meaning you’ll pay more for these shares than they’re worth in cash.

But it’s even rarer to find a stock trading at a density ratio below 1.

Density Ratio Below 1 = Cheap Stock & Massive Gains

A density ratio below 1 means a stock could be worth $10 in cash, yet it trades for $7.50. Or it’s worth $1 and trades for 75 cents, etc.

And rest assured, whenever America’s best investors can buy $1 for 75 cents or less, they do. And you should, too. That’s because these discounts, understandably, don’t last for long.

Just take a look at Cynosure, Inc. (Nasdaq: CYNO). It traded at a density of roughly 0.70 for about a month this year. Once investors woke up to the bargain on offer, shares surged 138% higher.

There’s another low-density stock up for grabs at the moment, too…

Buy This “Low-Density” Stock Today

If you want to put my low-density strategy to work today, consider Trident Microsystems, Inc. (Nasdaq: TRID), which makes specialized semiconductors used in flat panel televisions.

• With zero debt, $2.87 per share in cash, and a market price of $1.90, it trades at a density ratio of 0.66.
• In other words, when you buy Trident, you’re buying $1 for 66 cents.

Incidentally, such a steep discount also makes Trident a prime takeover target. And with $2.21 billion in cash, Broadcom Corp. (Nasdaq: BRCM) could easily afford the $125 million market cap Trident.

But, even if Broadcom doesn’t pounce on the opportunity, history dictates that other investors will.

Based on its low-density ratio, Trident needs to rebound 51% to return to a density ratio of 1.

I recommend you capitalize on this truly cheap stock before it’s too late.

Good investing,

Louis Basenese

Source: How to Take the Guesswork Out of Valuing Stocks

In the last two years, I’ve:

• Gone long the dollar when it was in the tank…
• Shorted oil near its peak…
• Shorted the big move to Treasuries on the heels of the credit crisis…
• And, most recently, shorted gold at $918 an ounce.

At the time of recommendation, each trade was extraordinarily unpopular, prompting some folks to flat out question my sanity. And yet, taking the dissenting opinion made money each time (the jury’s still out on the shorting gold trade.)

How’d I find the wherewithal – and nerve – to do it?

David Dreman – The Father of Contrarian Investing

I’ve been under the tutelage of David Dreman, known as “The Father of Contrarian Investing,” for many years.

Dreman literally wrote the book on contrarian investing. (If you don’t own a copy of his latest work – “Contrarian Investment Strategies: The Next Generation” – get one!)

In the book, he lays out his straightforward, time-tested investment philosophy to consistently outperform the markets: choose cheap investments that other investors hate.

Sounds too simple to be true, I know. But like any trading genius, Dreman’s track record underpins his investment philosophy…

• Since inception in 1988, his flagship large-cap value fund’s average annual return of 9.2% beats both the S&P 500 and Russell 1000 Value index by a full percentage point. His small-cap value fund has performed even better.
• Since inception in 2003, it has trounced the Russell 2000 Index (the benchmark for small-cap investments) and the S&P 500 index by more than seven percentage points.

Investing in Small Caps Predictions Ring True…

Recall, in January I predicted small cap investing would shine this year because they always do coming out of recessions. And this time has been no exception.

• From the March 9 bottom, small-cap stocks are up 50%, compared to 40% for large-caps stocks.
• And using history as our guide, we can expect more of the same ahead – small caps to trump the gains of their larger-cap peers for at least three more years.
• Thus, not capitalizing on this disparity would be foolish.
• Furthermore, the recent rally has increased stock valuations virtually across the board, so finding winning stocks will require increasingly more investment skill.

And that’s where Dreman comes in… No one on earth is better at unearthing small-cap value investments than he has been.

So how does he do it?

• First, he exploits the fact that the U.S. stocks with the lowest 20% of price-to-earnings ratios returned 16.8% per year from 1920 to 2004 – four percentage points better than the market as a whole. He buys nothing but such undervalued stocks.
• That said, he doesn’t just focus on the “cheapness” of a stock to determine its worthiness. “We don’t like dogs,” says Dreman, adding that, “All our stocks are financially strong, have high yields and earnings growth faster than the market.”
• He pays great attention to the stock filtering process, as well. Specifically, Dreman looks for companies with market caps between $300 million and $2.5 billion. Those are then screened based on their respective P/Es.
• Stocks with P/E ratios greater than the market get discarded, immediately (Dreman is innately opposed to paying a premium for growth). And the remaining companies (those with P/E ratios below the industry median) must possess an above average dividend yield, low leverage, low price-to-book and price-to-cash flow ratios, strong management teams and a catalyst that could spur future growth.

The result is typically three to four stocks in each industry group, with only one or two making the final cut.

Collectively, Dreman uses this investment process to construct a portfolio of 95 to 100 stocks from 50 different industry groups, with a 1% weighting to each. Such a small position size means that a single security can’t sour the overall portfolio performance. Which adds another layer of downside protection. (Deep-value stocks are inherently less risky than high-flying, high P/E growth stocks, anyway).

So clearly, Dreman does much more than simply buy small cap companies that investors have discarded, or ones in the midst of tough times. As he puts it, “We look for reasonably strong companies on the whole.”

But to really put his words into perspective, let’s consider a recent purchase…

Dreman Invests In Small-Caps With Aaron’s Inc.

Last year, Dreman added Aaron’s Inc. (NYSE: AAN) – a small-cap company that allows consumers to rent-to-own plasma TVs, household and office furniture and computers, without any credit checks.

Most investors looked at that business model, cringed and sold the company’s stock, causing it to lose 33% in 2007. After all, could you get any riskier than catering to consumers with poor or no credit during a credit crunch?

Dreman, of course, is too smart to fall for that. This guy can sniff out his prey from a mile away. He knew the current credit freeze was about to push previously credit-worthy buyers away from Best Buy and right through Aaron’s front doors. And with the stock trading at a historically low valuation below 11 times earnings, it was a no-brainer.

Sure enough, with an uptick in demand, Aaron’s earnings jumped a solid 19% last year alone.

And the stock defied the market, rallying 39% in 2008 while everything else took a bath. This year, it’s tacked on another 25%, thanks to a 55% jump in earnings in the first quarter.

Bottom line, small cap stocks can be some of the most profitable investments in any market. Should this market pull-back continue, consider this another great opportunity to pick up some attractive small caps.

But like Dreman, I recommend you stay away from dogs at any price.

Source: Investing in Small Caps: Why it Pays to be Contrarian

But now the stock market’s on the mend. In my book, a 49% rally off the bottom for the S&P 500 qualifies as healing.

The economy’s showing signs of improvement. First-time jobless claims have dropped more than 15% since peaking in April.

As for the M&A market, well, it’s still suffering…

Through the second quarter, volume dropped 40.2% worldwide. Deals involving U.S. companies fared worse, dropping 57.5%, according to Thomson Reuters. And July marked the first month in over a decade when not a single deal worth $5 billion or more was announced.

But if you’re serious about investing, you need to know when the M&A market is on the upswing and should be tracking it religiously.

Why?

Because nothing causes stock prices to rise faster and further than an unsolicited takeover offer.

In fact, if we invest in a company before a deal is announced, we stand to pocket an average gain of 43.5% to 53.7%, according to the numbers crunchers at FactSet (NYSE:FDS) MergerStat. In a single day! No other investment strategy can boast the same lightning fast rewards.

Tracking M&A Market Activity With High Credit Spreads

If you’re looking for one number to predict a full-blown rebound in M&A market activity – and signal the best time to invest in takeover targets – try high-yield credit spreads. The spread is simply the difference in interest rates between junk bonds (the typical vehicle used to finance M&A) and comparable U.S. Treasuries.

• When the spread is high – above the historical average of 590 basis points – it means banks consider the risk of lending to suitors to be above average. In turn, they compensate for the higher risk by charging higher interest rates, thereby choking off M&A market activity by making financing too expensive.
• On other hand, when the spread is below the historical average, it means banks consider the risk of lending to be low. In turn, they charge lower interest rates, which encourages M&A activity as companies capitalize on the cheap financing to go on buying sprees.

Right now the spread stands at 857 basis points. At first blush that seems terrible, until you look at this chart.

http://www.investmentu.com/images/iu081209chart.gif

Following the collapse of Lehman Brothers, spreads hit a high of 2,180 basis points! So we’re actually down 61% from that level, with momentum squarely on our side.

As this trend continues, financing will become more affordable. In turn, I expect M&A market activity to come roaring back.

The markets remained littered with historic values. More importantly, there’s a mountain of cash waiting to be leveraged and put to work.

Private equity funds alone are sitting on $1.02 trillion in dry powder, according to London-based research house Preqin. Almost half of that – $472 billion – resides in buyout funds. If they don’t find it a home (i.e. – start buying companies), they’ll be forced to return it to investors.

How to Play The Imminent M&A Market Rebound

In previous columns on the takeover boom, I explained my strategy for uncovering the market’s most promising takeover targets and highlighted sectors and companies ripe for the picking.

However, if you’re looking for a more conservative way to play the imminent M&A market rebound, and the acquisitive nature of private equity funds, consider The Blackstone Group (NYSE: BX).

Here’s why…

• Private equity firms typically enjoy the best returns from investments made in a down market. And Blackstone’s sitting on a $26 billion cash pile to take advantage of all the bargains and practice its expertise in distressed investing, deal making and restructuring.
• Sure, other options exist to get exposure to the private equity space and the M&A market, namely Fortress Investment Group, LLC (NYSE: FIG) and Och-Ziff Capital Management Group (NYSE: OZM). But neither stack up to Blackstone in terms of experience, expertise or financial resources.
• Plus, by investing in Blackstone you get a portfolio of companies that are much healthier than the market. Roughly two-thirds of the companies will report positive or flat earnings, compared to just 35% for the S&P 500. And almost no debt is coming due until 2013, eliminating the refinancing risk plaguing countless other businesses.

Tack on an annual stock dividend of $1.20 (equivalent to an 8.4% yield) and this is a no brainer. You’ll get paid to wait for the M&A activity to rebound and the Buyout King to get back to buying.

Good investing,

Louis Basenese

Source: The M&A Market: When This Number Falls, Expect the Takeovers to Heat Up

Here are three reasons why…

• Growth Doesn’t Pay

The justification for investing in emerging market stocks has always been the same – growth in emerging markets will far outstrip growth in the developed world and therefore, the profits will be greater.

After all, doesn’t it make sense that a company doing business in a country with GDP expanding at a 7% annual clip will earn way more than a company doing business in a country with GDP contracting?

Seems logical and if that’s the case, emerging markets are definitely the place to be right now. Barclays estimates developing Asian economies will grow by 5.2% this year, compared to a 2.3% contraction for the United States.

Here’s the rub: the classic justification is flawed. High economic growth does lead to higher profits for individual companies. But it doesn’t translate into higher stock returns for investors.

Based on decades of data from 53 countries, London Business School professor Elroy Dimson recently proved countries with the highest growth produce the lowest returns (6% per year), while countries with slowest growth produced the highest returns (12% per year).

How can this be? It’s simple, really. Attracted to higher growth, investors end up paying higher prices for emerging markets stocks, which cuts into returns.

Emerging Market Investors Violating Primary Rule of Investing

In other words, when it comes to emerging markets, investors lose their senses and consistently violate the primary rule of investing to buy low and sell high. And that’s certainly happening now…

• Valuations Hardly in Bargain Territory

If success in emerging markets boils down to buying in at the right price, now is not the right time.

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index trades at 17.8 times earnings, the highest level since the index peaked in late 2007. In comparison, the S&P 500 trades at 17.2 times earnings.

Moreover, the historical average for the MSCI index is roughly 14 times earnings, making current prices seem a bit stretched.

• No Safe Haven… Nasty Corrections Are the Norm

While emerging markets stocks can make you a fortune in a hurry, they can just as easily ruin you. Just consider:

• In the six weeks following Lehman’s collapse, emerging markets shed 47%, slightly more than the S&P 500 index, proving higher economic growth provides absolutely no buffer.

• After advancing more than 20% for five straight years through 2007, emerging markets cratered 53.3% in 2008. Remember, the S&P 500 “only” dropped 37.6% last year.

• In 2000, when the U.S. market slid 9.1%, emerging markets tanked 30.8%.

Emerging Markets Headed For Short-Term Profit Correction

Bottom line, I’m convinced emerging markets are headed for a short-term profit taking correction.

• Historical data proves these markets are susceptible to such sell offs.
• Valuations are getting stretched.
• And investors have never been more enamored with such stocks.
• Even the financial press can’t resist the euphoria. Yesterday, Bloomberg ran a feature entitled, “Emerging-Market Stocks to Gain Further After 52% Rally This Year.”

But make no mistake. This is a classic case of investors chasing performance. Such a strategy always fails. Or as Humphrey Neill put it in The Art of Contrary Thinking, “When everyone thinks alike, everyone is likely to be wrong.”

Don’t be everyone.

Instead, consider selling short the MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund (NSYE: EEM).

Or at the very least, check your asset allocation.

If you’ve got more than 20% of your portfolio in emerging markets, you could be in store for a nasty setback. To avoid it, I recommend you take some profits off the table while you still can.

Good investing,

Lou Basenese

Source: Emerging Markets: A Contrarian Take

The mainstream press would have us to believe a real estate market rebound is imminent. They keep glomming onto any data that shows the slightest sign of stability.

• For instance, Bloomberg jumped all over the July 1 report from the National Association of Realtors that showed pending sales for previously owned homes rose for the fourth consecutive month.
• Other outlets had a field day with the news out of the Mortgage Bankers Association that refinancings hit a three-month high in early July.
• And ditto for the news that foreclosures dropped 11% in the second quarter.

But these “signs of stabilization” are bogus. Or to beg, borrow and steal from value-investing legend, Whitney Tilson, they are the “mother of all head fakes.”

Fact is, these short-term improvements were fabricated. They materialized because of temporary factors like the $8,000 first time homebuyer tax credit (set to expire November 30), artificially low interest rates (remember the Fed’s been buying Treasuries, en masse, since March to suppress rates) and government and bank moratoriums on foreclosures.

In the end, all this massive intervention is doing is propping up short-term results and prolonging the inevitable. Furthermore, to turn a blind eye to all this government meddling and pretend it’s not artificially influencing demand and prolonging foreclosures, would be irresponsible.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m happy to see an improvement in the market from bad to less bad. But overall, the numbers are still crap.

Three Obstacles to a Housing Market Rebound

Over half of the homeowners who took advantage of loan modification programs, are delinquent again. They weren’t paying before they got interest rate and/or principal reductions. And go figure? They’re not paying now. Great idea Washington!

On top of that, housing prices are still too high to attract buyers yet too low for sellers who are underwater on their mortgages. Such out-of-whack supply/demand dynamics will only foster more uncertainty.

In my opinion, before any meaningful recovery in real estate prices can take root, we need to overcome three major obstacles…

• Rebound Obstacle #1: Inventory Glut. Nearly 10% of all homes built this decade are sitting vacant, compared to a historical average of 2.2%. In total, we’re sitting on almost 10 months worth of inventory versus a historical average of four months. If we factor in the “shadow inventory” – the roughly 600,000 homes that banks are withholding from the market – the problem worsens. Excess supply always erodes prices.
• Rebound Obstacle #2: Loan Resets. Forget subprime. We’ve already worked through 80% of those resets and written down $1.47 trillion in the process. Now we’re facing a $2.5 trillion mountain of Alt-A loan resets. The first big wave hits mid-2011, with the peak expected to come in early 2013. So we’ve still got time, but the early stats hardly instill confidence.More than 20% of Alt-A loans are already 60-plus days late, up from an average of about 3% for the last decade. If interest rates creep up even modestly in the next two years – a near cinch given the likelihood of inflation – payments will increase notably. In turn, so too will default rates.Bottom line, another wave of massive writedowns looms on the horizon.
• Rebound Obstacle #3: Foreclosures. One in four homeowners are now underwater. If we break it out by loan type the picture gets worse – 25% of prime loans, 45% of Alt-A loans, 50% of subprime loans are severely underwater. Add in the 6.5 million Americans out of work since the recession began and it doesn’t take an Einstein to predict where foreclosures are heading. Credit Suisse estimates that we’re in store for a total of 6.5 million by 2012.Even the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) concedes the obvious in its first quarter update, saying, “Looking forward, it does not appear the level of mortgage defaults will begin to fall until after the employment situation begins to improve.” Since the rosiest prediction doesn’t expect unemployment to peak until early 2010, as the MBA acknowledges, “…It is unlikely we will see much of an improvement [in foreclosure rates] until after that.”The fact that the social stigma attached with “walking away” has been severely (and sadly) diminished over the past decade only adds to the foreclosure heap. And more foreclosures will inevitably push prices lower.

The Housing Market’s Reality Bites… But We Can Still Profit

As I’ve said, a simple supply and demand equation underpins the housing market. Right now, there’s way too much supply. Thus, prices can only go lower. And in my opinion, they’ll go significantly lower.

Since the peak, home prices have dropped 34%, based on the Case Shiller Index. However, prices still rest roughly 10% above the long-term trend line.

But given the supply imbalance is so dramatic, and the fact that markets consistently overshoot resistance and support levels, I’m convinced that prices will crash right through the trend line, falling another 20% to 30% before we see a legitimate turnaround in 2011.

I’m not alone, either. Mortgage insurer PMI Group estimates that a 75% chance exists that the majority of our metropolitan areas will experience price declines through the first quarter of 2011. And if we experience a double-dip recession, all bets are off on how low prices will go.

The brave at heart can look to profit from the decline by shorting any of the major homebuilders like:

• Pulte Homes (NYSE: PHM)
• KB Home (NYSE: KBH)
• DR Horton (NYSE: DHI)
• Toll Brothers (NYSE: TOL)
• Or Lennar (NYSE: LEN)

Be warned, though. The ride will be volatile.

Otherwise, the newly launched MacroShares Major Metro Down ETF (NYSE: DMM) is an option. The exchange traded fund is benchmarked to the S&P/Case-Shiller Composite-10 Home Price Index and features three times (300%) leverage. For every 1% decline in the index (i.e. real estate prices), the ETF should increase in value by 3%.

For the truly conservative investor, I recommend the “nothing ventured, nothing lost” approach. In other words, wait to go long when buying real estate because we’re nowhere close to a bottom. At the very least, wait for the prevailing shrink-wrap frenzy to end.

Good investing,

Louis Basenese

Source: Three (More) Reasons Real Estate Isn’t Rebounding

Year-to-date, General Electric is the worst-performing stock in the Dow, down 22.3%. Meanwhile, TEPPCO is up 69%, including dividends.

(If any of you took me up on my income investment recommendation, e-mail us and let us know how you did at comments@investmentu.com.)

Of course, part of the move higher for TEPPCO can be attributed to news that Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) is buying the company, as I predicted.

For those of you that purchased the stock, I recommend you take profits now. And whatever you do, don’t reinvest them in GE.

GE: Reasons Why It’s Not a Safe Income Investment

My reasons for disliking GE as a safe income investment remain the same.

The company defies the golden rule of income investing – go with simple businesses, because simple businesses make money and can pay dividends, consistently.

Remember, GE’s business is all over the place with sales in water, security, railroads, oil and gas, media and entertainment, lighting, health care, consumer lending, commercial lending, energy, electrical distribution, consumer electronics, aviation and finally (drum roll) appliances.

And it’s only getting more complicated. This week, the company announced it’s getting involved with embryonic stem cell research.

Another problem? GE will always be fighting the law of large numbers. At a market cap of $125 billion, it takes an awful lot of growth to move the earnings needle and in turn, share prices.

Right now, that’s not happening.

Income Investing: The Smart Way to Pick Dividend Stocks

Again, it’s not fair of me to bash GE without offering up an alternative. So here it is: Windstream Corp. (NYSE: WIN).

The company is the country’s largest rural wireline telecommunications company. It was formed in mid-2006 through the combination of ALLTEL’s wireline business with VALOR Communications Group.

It operates in 16 states… in the sticks! Off-the-beaten-path markets, where big carriers like AT&T and Verizon don’t focus because the upfront costs are too high. Just to give you an idea, in most suburban and urban markets the number of access lines per square mile are over 110. In most of Windstream’s markets it’s below 20.

Obviously, this lack of competition confers notable advantages on Windstream. Namely, high and steady profit margins. Even in this declining market, Windstream’s been able to maintain its operating margin of 35%.

Even better, at current prices, the stock yields 12%. (In comparison, GE currently yields 3.4%).

Here are the four main reasons I believe this dividend is safe:

• Wide Economic Moat. Many carriers are losing traditional phone customers to cable phone services. However, Windstream is partially insulated from this trend. About 30% of its customers don’t even have the option to get cable modem services. The cable companies just don’t serve those markets. At the same time, the severities of this recession are forcing many larger carriers to cutback or suspend expansion efforts into Windstream’s territories. The delay only allows the company to solidify its competitive position and minimize the impact of new entrants over the long term.

• It’s Growing for Free. The big old honking stimulus bill included $7.2 billion in funds for Internet expansion. Windstream qualifies for the grants and can use the “free” money to expand its footprint in rural markets.

• Solid Cash Flow. In the last year, cash flow improved 14% to $763 million thanks to lower capital expenditures and cost cutting efforts. In 2009 we can expect the same, as management doesn’t anticipate the need to increase capital expenditures.

• Credit is No Concern. Windstream’s got a sizable $5.4 billion debt balance, but it’s reasonable relative to cash flows (interest expense should consume less than 28% of cash flow), lower than the industry average leverage and there’s no immediate need for refinancing. The earliest debt maturity is in 2011 for $457 million. If necessary, the company could pay off the balance from current cash flows and the money in the bank. After that, the next significant debt maturity doesn’t come until 2013.

Like TEPPCO, Windstream comes with a kicker – it’s also a takeover target.

In the last five years we’ve seen larger carriers, eager to juice growth, acquire rural carriers with high margins for a hefty premium. Windstream possesses the same qualities of past takeover targets, so a deal is certainly possible in the next six to nine months. A cheap valuation, at just 9.5 times forward earnings, increases the odds.

Bottom line, Windstream provides reliable income and the potential for significant capital appreciation like we witnessed with TEPPCO. Sadly, we can’t say the same about GE. So dump it if you own it! And Buy Windstream instead.

Good investing,

Lou Basenese

Source: Need an Income Investment? Keep Dumping GE and Buy this Stock Instead