<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; Low Interest Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/low-interest-rates/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:01:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The best way to get through a debt crisis?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-best-way-to-get-through-a-debt-crisis/20947</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-best-way-to-get-through-a-debt-crisis/20947#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Field Hands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geniuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligentsia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Many Blessings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchasing Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rigging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What’s the best way to get through a debt crisis? Straight through was our advice last week. For at least a thousand years, the business cycle went round and round without help from central bankers or economists. It is only since these geniuses have been on the case that really serious problems have arisen. The Panic of 1920 – in which the US government did nothing but cut taxes and spending – was quickly forgotten. The Panic of 1929, on the other hand, was followed by massive rigging and jiving by the authorities. It took 20 years and a world war to overcome; today it is still remembered today as the Great Depression.</p>
<p>Martin Wolf, speaking, gravely, for the world’s intelligentsia&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s the best way to get through a debt crisis? Straight through was our advice last week. For at least a thousand years, the business cycle went round and round without help from central bankers or economists. It is only since these geniuses have been on the case that really serious problems have arisen. The Panic of 1920 – in which the US government did nothing but cut taxes and spending – was quickly forgotten. The Panic of 1929, on the other hand, was followed by massive rigging and jiving by the authorities. It took 20 years and a world war to overcome; today it is still remembered today as the Great Depression.</p>
<p>Martin Wolf, speaking, gravely, for the world’s intelligentsia in <em>The Financial Times</em> last week, proclaimed that: “the only thing worse than rescuing the system would have been not rescuing it.” But he is wrong; of all the many blessings economists may bestow upon a grateful people, improving the economy is not one of them. An economy is a natural thing. It can be improved by the striving of entrepreneurs, the prudence of bankers, and the sweating of field hands. But when it comes to the macro-economic policy, forbearance is the quality that pays. Any initiative on the feds’ part inevitably makes things worse.</p>
<p>The Bubble Era, like the Great Depression, was largely –but not completely – the result of government initiative. Artificially low interest rates – intended to counter the modest downturn of 2001 – sent the wrong message. Consumers – notably those in Britain and America – bought things they couldn’t afford. Producers – notably those in Asia – made things for which there was no real market. Debt piled up. Mountains of it.</p>
<p>As consumers bought more and producers made more the economy grew. But much of the economic “growth” of the 2001-2007 period was fraudulent. It was based on debt spending, not on genuine increases in purchasing power. Debt pretends to be real money. It looks like the real thing, but it is not. It stimulates the economy like counterfeit money. It causes production and consumption, but of the wrong sort. Former Reagan era Office of Management and Budget director David Stockman estimates the level of “counterfeit GDP” at $4 trillion in the US alone.</p>
<p>The fraud was discovered, though misunderstood, when sub-prime debt began to implode.</p>
<p>Finish reading the complete article at <a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/kiss-of-debt/"><em>The <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links">Daily Reckoning</a></em></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-best-way-to-get-through-a-debt-crisis/20947/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OECD Boosts Outlook but Urges Developed Countries to Keep Lending Costs Low</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/oecd-boosts-outlook-but-urges-developed-countries-to-keep-lending-costs-low/18340</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/oecd-boosts-outlook-but-urges-developed-countries-to-keep-lending-costs-low/18340#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Simpkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrialized Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Simpkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oecd Countries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) raised its growth outlook for industrialized countries for the first time in two years and said the United States would experience a quicker recovery than Europe. However, the group also said that central banks around the world should maintain exceptionally low interest rates with little regard for inflation over the next two years.</p>
<p>After predicting a 0.1% economic contraction for its 30 member nations in March, the OECD said growth would reach 0.7% in 2010. The OECD also said this year’s economic contraction would be 4.1% compared to its earlier forecast of a 4.3% decline.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/48/0,3343,en_2649_34109_43149424_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_blank">The good news is that economic activity in OECD countries is reaching bottom</a>, following the deepest decline since the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) raised its growth outlook for industrialized countries for the first time in two years and said the United States would experience a quicker recovery than Europe. However, the group also said that central banks around the world should maintain exceptionally low interest rates with little regard for inflation over the next two years.</p>
<p>After predicting a 0.1% economic contraction for its 30 member nations in March, the OECD said growth would reach 0.7% in 2010. The OECD also said this year’s economic contraction would be 4.1% compared to its earlier forecast of a 4.3% decline.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/48/0,3343,en_2649_34109_43149424_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_blank">The good news is that economic activity in OECD countries is reaching bottom</a>, following the deepest decline since the Second World War. In fact, this is the first Economic Outlook in two years to revise up previous projections for OECD economic growth compared with the previous Outlook.” said OECD Secretary General Angel Gurria. “But we should not get carried away. The upward revision is fairly modest and we foresee a recovery that will be rather slow and fragile for some time.”</p>
<p>The recovery in the United States is expected to outpace that of both Europe and Japan, according to OECD estimates. Gross domestic product (GDP) in the United States will contract 2.8% this year before rebounding to 0.9% growth in 2010. In March, the OECD predicted the U.S. economy would contract by 4% this year and stagnate in 2010.</p>
<p>Euro area GDP is expected to contract 4.8% this year and to be flat in 2010, the OECD said. That’s actually worse than the organization predicted in March when it said the euro area economy would decline 4.1% this year and increase 0.3% in 2010.</p>
<p>“Signs of impending recovery in the euro area are not yet as clearly visible, reflecting country-specific combinations of bursting housing bubbles, export set-backs and damage to financial sectors,” the OECD said. “The eventual recovery may also be slow in this region, including because rising unemployment makes consumers more reluctant to spend.”</p>
<p>Analysts have said that the European Central Bank (ECB) erred by not cutting its lending rates as quickly and dramatically as the U.S. Federal Reserve, which could explain the difference between the rates of recovery for each region.</p>
<p>Other central banks “<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/15/european-central-bank-2/" target="_blank">have their own responsibility and decisions and I have already said that as far as we are concerned</a>, we would be very, very keen to avoid to be put in a situation which for us would not be appropriate, namely a liquidity trap,” ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet said following the Fed’s decision to cut its benchmark rate to a range of 0%-0.25%.</p>
<p>But it is precisely the aggressive monetary actions taken by the Fed and other central banks that the OECD credits with stifling the global recession.</p>
<p>“Signs have multiplied that U.S. activity could bottom out in the course of the second half of this year,” said the OECD. “Such a recovery would reflect tremendous policy effort.”</p>
<p>However, the group also warned that as fiscal stimulus fades and the need for balance-sheet repairs escalates, any U.S. recovery could be “<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/10/jobless-recovery/" target="_blank">uncharacteristically weak and insufficient to bear down on unemployment at around 10% of the labor force.</a>“</p>
<p>For that reason, the OECD recommends the U.S. Federal Reserve not raise rates until 2011. With regard as to whether or not keeping rates so low for such a long period of time will lead to inflation, the OECD doesn’t see that as being the case.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE55N1L920090624?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0&amp;sp=true" target="_blank">The projection that we have is one where the U.S. is emerging from the recession a little earlier than the euro area</a>, which does not really support that argument,” OECD chief economiest Jorgen Elmeskov told<strong><em>Reuters</em></strong>.</p>
<p>As far as Europe is concerned, the ECB &#8211; which has cut its benchmark rate to 1% –should exhaust “the remaining scope for cutting the rate on the main refinancing operations sooner rather than later.”</p>
<p>“The bleak growth outlook argues for using additional room, where it still exists, for interest rates cuts and warrants keeping exceptionally low policy rates for a substantial period of time,” the group said.</p>
<p>While policymakers at the ECB have recently expressed a willingness to push the key rate down below the 1% floor, there is still a measure of hesitancy on the continent.</p>
<p>The ECB yesterday (Tuesday) pumped a record 442.2 billion euros into the Eurozone banking system in its first-ever offer of unlimited one-year funds. The demand for the funds highlighted expectations in Europe that liquidity will not be available again on such favorable terms.</p>
<p>The ECB itself reserved the right in future one-year operations to charge an interest rate above its main policy rate.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2d9300c0-60a2-11de-aa12-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">Let’s wait and see how the latest measures work</a>,” Jose Manuel Gonzalez-Paramo, an ECB executive board member told the <strong><em>Financial Times</em></strong>. “We did not decide that 1% was the lowest level imaginable in any scenario, but we do think that it is the appropriate level given the information that we have currently available.”</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.markiteconomics.com/" target="_blank">preliminary Markit purchasing managers index (PMI)</a>, a closely watched survey released Tuesday, showed that Eurozone output fell for the thirteenth consecutive month in June.</p>
<p>The PMI rose to 44.4 in June, up from 44.0 in May. A reading of less than 50 indicates a contraction in activity, while a figure of more than 50 signals expansion. <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/euro-zone-june-pmi-rises-less-than-expected" target="_blank">Economists had forecast a rise to 45.5</a>, according to <em><strong>MarketWatch.com</strong></em>.</p>
<p>Dominic Bryant at BNP Paribas told <em><strong>The FT</strong></em> that Europe’s economy won’t be gaining traction “<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c1e03e28-5f4e-11de-93d1-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">anytime soon</a>,” and he expects the economy to be “more or less flat for the next four quarters.”</p>
<p>Europe’s underperformance when compared with the United States and United Kingdom will reflect “the less aggressive action of policy makers in the Eurozone in the areas of monetary policy, fiscal policy and banking sector support,” Bryant said.</p>
<p><a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/24/oecd-outlook/">OECD Boosts Outlook but Urges Developed Countries to Keep Lending Costs Low</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/oecd-boosts-outlook-but-urges-developed-countries-to-keep-lending-costs-low/18340/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Four Key Reasons the U.S. Economy is Facing a ‘Jobless Recovery’</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-four-key-reasons-the-us-economy-is-facing-a-%e2%80%98jobless-recovery%e2%80%99/18126</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-four-key-reasons-the-us-economy-is-facing-a-%e2%80%98jobless-recovery%e2%80%99/18126#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hutchinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMGMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobless Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Hutchinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When the Labor Department recently reported that U.S. payrolls fell by 345,000 jobs in May &#8211; the lowest total in eight months &#8211; commentators were suddenly spotting “green shoots” of economic recovery virtually everywhere they looked.</p>
<p>Given that more than $800 billion of federal money has been earmarked for U.S. “stimulus” projects, one would actually expect that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#38;sid=aWbpOrWSssE8">the frightening job losses of the past six months</a> would quickly reverse, and that the U.S. economy would soon start creating the 3 million jobs that U.S. President Barack Obama <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/03/09/president-barack-obama/">has promised</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, that has not been the case.</p>
<p>That’s not to say that the outlook is for a Great Depression, an economic reversal in which a country’s output plummets by 25% or more from its peak level. While&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Labor Department recently reported that U.S. payrolls fell by 345,000 jobs in May &#8211; the lowest total in eight months &#8211; commentators were suddenly spotting “green shoots” of economic recovery virtually everywhere they looked.</p>
<p>Given that more than $800 billion of federal money has been earmarked for U.S. “stimulus” projects, one would actually expect that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aWbpOrWSssE8">the frightening job losses of the past six months</a> would quickly reverse, and that the U.S. economy would soon start creating the 3 million jobs that U.S. President Barack Obama <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/03/09/president-barack-obama/">has promised</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, that has not been the case.</p>
<p>That’s not to say that the outlook is for a Great Depression, an economic reversal in which a country’s output plummets by 25% or more from its peak level. While the current U.S. recession may well be the “worst since the Great Depression,” it’s becoming clear that the peak-to-trough output decline will be something like 5% &#8211; worse than the recessions of 1973-75 and 1980-82, both of which saw output declines of about 3.5%, but not all that much worse.</p>
<p>After all, the money supply has not been allowed to collapse as it did during the 1930s and there has been no repetition of the infamous Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, though the “Buy America” provisions in the original stimulus outline and the <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/17/buy-china/">corresponding “Buy China” provisions in</a>China’s corresponding package indicate that “Smoot-Hawleyism” still lurks just beneath the surface.</p>
<p>However, the following four factors make it almost certain that the U.S. economy will be slow:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Record-low interest rates make it impossible for the U.S. central bank to use rate cuts to jump-start growth.</li>
<li>The huge U.S. budget deficit will force the federal government to continue its heavy borrowing &#8211; potentially “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowding_out_(economics)">crowding out</a>” private-sector players seeking loans to finance their own growth.</li>
<li>The growing size and influence of the U.S. public sector.</li>
<li>And an over-growth of government regulation.</li>
</ul>
<p>Let’s consider each one.</p>
<p>First and foremost, the U.S. Federal Reserve has loosened money supply inordinately over the last year, with short-term interest rates at 0.00% and money supply growth at 15% per annum. Thus, there is no Fed loosening available to spur employment.</p>
<p>Interest-rate-sensitive sectors &#8211; especially housing and construction &#8211; are likely to remain depressed for years. These sectors are major employers of low-skilled and semi-skilled labor, which will not be picking up their normal slack.</p>
<p>A second adverse factor is the exceptionally large federal budget deficit - <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ahrOZ.gd85yc">expected to reach $1.85 trillion, or 13% of the U.S. economy, in this year alone</a>, according to the nonpartisan <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/">Congressional Budget Office</a>(CBO). That deficit will stretch several years into the future, thanks to the stimulus package and various bailouts initiatives.</p>
<p>In the short term, these rescue-oriented provisions have helped U.S. employment, not the least by allowing federal and state governments to do some hiring. But in the longer term, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowding_out_(economics)">the federal borrowing they have caused will restrict the private sector’s access to the capital markets</a>. That will hinder small businesses in particular. Indeed, the private sector will find it difficult to fund capital expansion, and again the result is likely to be a dearth of hiring.</p>
<p>A third adverse factor is the expansion of the public sector itself. To some extent, it does not matter how budget deficits are financed; the important consideration is the transfer of resources from the private sector &#8211; allocated by the automatic optimization of the so-called “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_mechanism">price mechanism</a>” &#8211; into the public sector, where no such considerations apply.</p>
<p>It’s not just a question of government itself; it’s now clear, for example, that <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=chrysler+LLC">Chrysler LLC</a> and General Motors Corp. (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AGMGMQ">GMGMQ</a>) are to be controlled by the government &#8211; with subsidies &#8211; at our expense.</p>
<p>When General Motors announces, as the company did Wednesday, that it will build automobiles on the basis of an assumed oil price of $100-$120 per barrel, one sees at once a politically motivated strategy; GM will cease making the large cars that in the past have been its principal source of profit. If oil prices average $50 or less, as is perfectly possible in a long period of sluggish global growth, General Motors will be a mess &#8211; and will need to be bailed out by us again.</p>
<p>The late <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Buckley,_Jr.">William F. Buckley Jr</a>. once claimed that 500 names chosen at random from the Boston telephone book could do a better job of running the country than Congress; I wouldn’t mind betting that such a random selection would also make a better job of running General Motors than the government.</p>
<p>Related to the growth in government is the growth in regulation. For example, President Obama’s “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cap-and-trade">cap-and-trade</a>” <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/06/outlook-2009/">plan to address global warming</a> will impose a new <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/04/081304.asp">tranche</a> of costs on the U.S. economy, without any great offsetting spurs to employment. In areas such as energy production and heavy industry, employment will be depressed by the additional cost burdens those areas bring, as well as by the simple difficulty of complying with the new regulations.</p>
<p>To see where a larger state sector and more regulation can lead, one need only look at the European Union (EU). Whereas U.S. unemployment was below 5% for much of the last decade, the lowest rate reached since 2000 was 8.8% in the EU. <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/15/european-job-losses/">What’s more is that certain areas of the EU have much worse records than this</a>.</p>
<p>In Spain, for example, unemployment was close to 20% for much of the 1980s and 1990s, and has now soared once again to no less than 18.2%.  The EU is not ensconced in a Great Depression and Spain remains a relatively wealthy country; nevertheless, the rigidities in the European system are such that unemployment remains persistently high, with adverse social effect, such as the rioting in the Paris <a href="http://en.wordpress.com/tag/banlieus/">banlieus</a>.</p>
<p>The European Commission (EC) recognized this problem as early as the 1980s, and has been gradually pushing Europe towards the more open U.S. labor market, with only moderate success.</p>
<p>Because of over-loose money, excessive budget deficits, growing government and impending regulation, it is thus unlikely that the U.S. economy and its job market will bounce back as quickly as it has in the past.</p>
<p>The investment “takeaway” from this is obvious, I fear: A substantial part of one’s money should be invested in <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/18/germany-emerging-market/">the free-market economies of East Asia</a>, where regulation and taxation are lower, so even though a recession has also hit, recovery is likely to be much more robust.</p>
<p>Source:  <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/19/us-jobless-recovery/">The Four Key Reasons the U.S. Economy is Facing a ‘Jobless Recovery’</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-four-key-reasons-the-us-economy-is-facing-a-%e2%80%98jobless-recovery%e2%80%99/18126/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A National “Stress Test”</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-national-%e2%80%9cstress-test%e2%80%9d/17040</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-national-%e2%80%9cstress-test%e2%80%9d/17040#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell McDougal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stress Test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By now, you have surely heard that our elitist banks passed their recent government sponsored “stress test”? Forget about it! Relying on this incestuous bunch to grade themselves is like putting Madonna in charge of screening convent applicants. Take no comfort in shams of this nature.</p>
<p>There are bigger fish being fried. The entire American nation is in the crosshairs and will be severely tested like never before.</p>
<p>Very few people comprehend the scope of the problems that continue to unfold. The Dow is up a couple of thousand points so everything must be normalizing, no?</p>
<p>No! Look deeper.</p>
<p><strong>The US Hits the Treadmill</strong></p>
<p>The core of our problems lies  deep in the roots of the overall system.</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The US economic model has been extremely flawed&#8230;</li></ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now, you have surely heard that our elitist banks passed their recent government sponsored “stress test”? Forget about it! Relying on this incestuous bunch to grade themselves is like putting Madonna in charge of screening convent applicants. Take no comfort in shams of this nature.</p>
<p>There are bigger fish being fried. The entire American nation is in the crosshairs and will be severely tested like never before.</p>
<p>Very few people comprehend the scope of the problems that continue to unfold. The Dow is up a couple of thousand points so everything must be normalizing, no?</p>
<p>No! Look deeper.</p>
<p><strong>The US Hits the Treadmill</strong></p>
<p>The core of our problems lies  deep in the roots of the overall system.</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The US economic model has been extremely flawed for more than an entire generation. Our “money” holds no intrinsic value. We follow the <em>consumption </em>mantra       instead of the <em>production </em>model. The good times come only when credit expands in bubblical proportions (don’t look that one up in Webster’s). Credit contractions, like the historical one we’re now in, threaten to implode the entire edifice. The Fed is the master of the boom and bust cycle and they have really overdone it this time.</li>
<li>Low interest rates are damaging to the key       individuals that can rescue us … <em>savers. </em>Save the savers!</li>
<li>There are consequences to failed economics. Our central planners are a scant few decades following in the footsteps of the Ruskies. It is definitely <em>not </em>free       market <a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com/HasCapitalismFailed.html" target="_blank">capitalism that is crumbling</a>.       Ignorance, greed and fraud are simply meeting their inevitable demise.</li>
</ul>
<p>Results- The patient literally fell off the  treadmill.</p>
<p><strong>The Telling Electrocardiogram (ECG)</strong></p>
<p>There are some really  weird heart rhythms on this now intensive care patient.</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>This decade has been one of <em>depression </em>only disguised by official       lies and distortions (altered statistics). A <em>sustained recession </em>is, in fact, a depression. The sustained recession started in 2001, with a brief interlude in 2004 and I’m sticking with that opinion regardless of how few see it. Check out the GDP chart at <a href="http://www.shadowstats.com/" target="_blank">www.shadowstats.com</a> for       yourself. Any analysis is only as good as the documentation used.</li>
<li>The collateral foundation is crumbling out       from under <em>all </em>American banks. Real estate continues to deflate and this directly impacts the viability of banks. Their ability to lend disappears with foreclosed homes and non-performing shopping centers. Home prices were down 14% during the first quarter of this year compared to the first quarter of 2008. At least 30% of US households owe more on their homes than they’re worth. Real estate has <em>not </em>bottomed.</li>
<li>Joblessness goes hand in hand with real estate failures. The Labor Department just fessed up to a 9% unemployment rate. The rule of thumb is to roughly double the propaganda figures that come out of DC/NY. We’re heading next for 20% unemployment and all but the most gullible know it. More reliable reporting, again, comes out of the Shadow Stats website.</li>
<li>American debts are way, way past the point of ever       being repaid. They will be <em><a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com/the-final-d-word.html" target="_blank">defaulted</a> </em> on. I won’t bore you with excessive numbers here because eyes tend to glaze over. Our economic leaders are throwing down multiple trillions of dollars in between shots of tequila. Practically none of this funding is aimed at Main Street. Recent “stimulus” spending and desperate promises come to $29 trillion per Bill Buckler of the esteemed Privateer.</li>
<li>Tax receipts for fiscal 2008-2009 are down 31%       for individuals and 58% for corporations. Meanwhile, government is <em>vastly </em>expanding its spending and a       collision is inevitable.</li>
<li>Foreigners are balking at purchasing more American debt and the Fed, in an end game strategy, has stepped into the gap. <a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com/the-fed%E2%80%99s-march-to-madness.html" target="_blank">Don’t try this at home</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Results-  There is a dangerous cardiac arrest in progress. One more test to go.</p>
<p><strong>The Dreaded Proctologist</strong></p>
<p>This test is the most revealing one of all. You will need more than a Valium just to review these results. The creatures that have brought us to this fateful moment show no signs of seeing daylight anytime soon.</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Failed entities should be purged from the system. Fraud requires punishment. Instead, incestuous entities like Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, AIG, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and others were and are deemed <em>too well connected to       fail. </em>A financial coup d’etat has transpired as Goldman Sachs refugees       have <em>overtly </em>grabbed the ring of       power. The banking elite continue to clutch their <a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com/whoelectedtheseguys.html" target="_blank">power</a>.</li>
<li>The shadow banking system that directly caused       this American catastrophe continues to bring forth more and more <em>derivatives. </em>The BIS, the bankers’ bank in Switzerland, reports $684 trillion in these hidden, unregulated and dangerous instruments. Other sources report them as high as one <em>quadrillion</em> dollars. There’s a Zimbabwean number if there ever was one. There can be little doubt derivatives are continuing to <em>fail </em>behind       the scenes, further compounding all these issues<em>.</em></li>
<li>The printing press is also found with this scoping exam and it’s obviously turned to malignant mode. How do you cure a problem caused by extreme amounts of credit and debt with unfathomable amounts of the same?</li>
<li>No observed green objects resembled “shoots”.</li>
</ul>
<p>Results- A <em>massive</em> surgical resection is mandated.  Today.</p>
<p><strong>Test Results and Prognosis</strong></p>
<p>Grievously, this patient has abused its heart and lost its soul. It is unrecognizable from its original Constitutional form and very unlikely to revert back to it. It exhibits no free markets, no honest money and few brave and rational leaders. Short of a miracle, you’re looking at a terminal case.</p>
<p>The banks passed their stress test but you dare not rest easy. Al Capone would have given himself a glowing report card if given the opportunity. The times remain extremely precarious. Protect yourself by staying away from the Kool-Aid and heading for the precious metals.</p>
<p>Source: <a title="Permanent Link to A National “Stress Test”" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com/a-national-stress-test.html">A National “Stress Test”</a></p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<p><!--Session data--><br />
<input id="jsProxy">
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" /><!--Session data--><br />
<input id="jsProxy">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-national-%e2%80%9cstress-test%e2%80%9d/17040/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fed’s March (to) Madness</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-fed%e2%80%99s-march-to-madness/15382</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-fed%e2%80%99s-march-to-madness/15382#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell McDougal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasuries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Fed pulled out its “nuclear” option last week when it announced coming purchases of $300 billion in long term Treasuries (and other similar extravaganzas). This is an act of total desperation. </p>
<div>It will also serve as a key historic moment in US and global monetary economics. Let’s look closely at what it will mean to you.Why exactly did the Fed resort to such a stunt? The stated reason is to bring down long- term interest rates in typical central planning fashion. A re-inflation of another credit bubble is also in their pipe dreams. We all like low interest rates when we borrow,but our capacity to borrow is long gone<em>. </em>Unfortunately, low interest rates punish savers who should be the&#8230;</div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fed pulled out its “nuclear” option last week when it announced coming purchases of $300 billion in long term Treasuries (and other similar extravaganzas). This is an act of total desperation. </p>
<div>It will also serve as a key historic moment in US and global monetary economics. Let’s look closely at what it will mean to you.Why exactly did the Fed resort to such a stunt? The stated reason is to bring down long- term interest rates in typical central planning fashion. A re-inflation of another credit bubble is also in their pipe dreams. We all like low interest rates when we borrow,but our capacity to borrow is long gone<em>. </em>Unfortunately, low interest rates punish savers who should be the backbone of a healthy economy.</div>
<div>
<p>The real reason for the Treasury support is that <em>no one else will make these purchases. </em>Foreign nations are balking, and in fact, don’t have enough money to satisfy US demands for endless and drastic amounts of borrowing. Only China has the capability with their massive US dollar reserves to step into this gap on a short-term basis. They could only do so, should they chose to, only for a year or so. The Chinese communists will extract a heavy price for further participation. Where’s Senator Joe McCarthy when you need him? Why are we stuck with a bunch of Charleys?</p>
<p>US citizens and corporations have next to zero capability of buying the necessary funding of an out of control government. We are tapped out and the previous credit bubble is still in contraction mode. This balloon won’t take a patch.</p>
<p>The Fed and the US government are throwing trillions of dollars around like Spring Break youths throw down shots of tequila in Cancun or Cabo. The comparisons don’t stop there. Don’t look to New York or DC for mature or sober actions. Present budgetary “needs” are $3.1 trillion and counting just for 2009. The ‘09 budget deficitis now projected at $1.8 trillion! You likely need no reminder that government tax receipts are plummeting. The Fed is now stepping into the gap to print the difference.</p>
<p>Yes, the US is now running on fumes and digital computer entries. Neither the Fed nor the Treasury has a balance sheet’s worth of Bernie Madoff standards. They are now printing and swapping astronomical amounts of I.O.U.s. as they destroy the paper mache castle. You and your kids pick up the tab as well as the interest. Or you can defaulton it.</p>
<p>Get used to the default word.</p>
<p>Last week’s article hit hard on the shadowbanking system or parallel <a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com/Article.aspx?Id=2008" target="_blank">world of finance</a>.</p>
<p>This is where you need to look to see what is really transpiring. The markets are forcing</p>
<p>Long-term interest rates higher in order to compensate suckers who for some reason want to hold the cascading debts of a crumbling empire. Oops, I forgot, we don’t have free markets. We have central planning.</p>
<p>Higher interest rates stand to further implode the mountain of hidden and unregulated interest rate related derivatives!</p>
<p>The Fed cannot allow this, as they will do absolutely anything to maintain control of their 96-year con. The money power has long been known to create disasters in order to expand their chokehold on their serfs. Yep, the crooks love a <a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com/article.aspx?id=1110" target="_blank">crisis</a>.</p>
<p>Will the Fed’s ploy to buy long-term Treasuries and other toxic paper products work?</p>
<p>Nope, it will not. It is sheer folly in the long run. This act of total desperation sends a global message that will destroy the dollar and end its status as the world’s sole reserve currency. The dollar reacted immediately to the news as it sold off dramatically. The Fed is sacrificing the dollar. Maybe they can purchase dollars with presto chango “money” next. One of these goofy ideas needs to work … at least for a while. Truth be told, our economic wizards perform these deeds and multiple others with regularity. They thrive on circular reasoning, at best.</p>
<p>The US isn’t the only country printing money to buy its own bonds. England made a similar announcement a couple weeks ago and you can expect manycountries to follow suit. Inflation is best known as a <em>monetary event. </em>Printing unimaginable amounts of money out of thin air makes every existing dollar diminish in value. Sooner or later, prices rise accordingly.</p>
<p>I’ve said previously that high inflation (double digits) is the best-case scenario for the US. Things could get much worse than that but that argument is for another day. One way or another, the country is set to be unrecognizable in the next three to five years. We are at a historic crossroad and very few people comprehend what has been brought down upon their heads. Team Obama is the same as Team Bush, Team Clinton, Team Bush, etc.</p>
<p>Needless to say, gold, silver, and other tangible assets in general will absolutely soar in a hyperinflationary environment. You can look at the 1970s as a prime example; even though today’s current mess is an order of magnitude worse than the 70s. Gold went from $35 to $195 in 1974. It reached $850 by early 1980. Junior gold stocks jumped 10X, 20X and more back then.</p>
<p>The Fed is on a much more dangerous path right now. Do the math for a new gold high. The Fed isn’t accountable to Congress. They certainly aren’t accountable to you. My buddy from GATA, Chris Powell, proclaimed the following recently, <em>“any government that can disburse $2 trillion secretly, without any accountability, is not a democratic government. It is government of, by, and, for the bankers.”</em></p>
<p>Chris has been on this trail long enough to understand clearly what is going on. He is a real patriot as is the entire GATA cast.</p>
<p>You’ll have to protect yourself by being truthfully informed and properly positioned.</p>
<p>We have a broad spectrum of resource stock plays in my <em>Resource Windfall Speculator. </em>A whiff of hyperinflation will send these stocks on a rocket ride. Small gold and silver stocks haven’t kept pace with the rises in physical gold or silver over the last couple of years. They <em>will </em>catch up in a hurry when these monetary abuse-sniffing metalsescape their shackles. You should also make sure you own precious metals and store them in your own possession while you still can.</p>
<p>It’s March and <em>madness</em> abounds, but it’s not just a tournament for the Fed. It’s a way of life. This is a creature that should not live to 100.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com/Article.aspx?Id=2026">Source: The Fed’s March (to) Madness </a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-fed%e2%80%99s-march-to-madness/15382/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Novel Approach to Debt Management</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-novel-approach-to-debt-management/10528</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-novel-approach-to-debt-management/10528#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Daughty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Daughty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=10528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I thought I was dreaming when I read on Bloomberg.com that short-term Treasuries rose in market value as buyers rushed to buy them, thus &#8220;pushing rates on the three-month bill negative for the first time, as investors gravitate toward the safety of U.S. government debt amid the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.&#8221;</p>
<p>More specifically, &#8220;The Treasury sold $27 billion of three-month bills yesterday at a discount rate of 0.005 percent, the lowest since it starting auctioning the securities in 1929. The U.S. also sold $30 billion of four-week bills today at zero percent for the first time since it began selling the debt in 2001.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since I was dreaming, I figured that I would somehow involve some of the cuter&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I was dreaming when I read on Bloomberg.com that short-term Treasuries rose in market value as buyers rushed to buy them, thus &#8220;pushing rates on the three-month bill negative for the first time, as investors gravitate toward the safety of U.S. government debt amid the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.&#8221;</p>
<p>More specifically, &#8220;The Treasury sold $27 billion of three-month bills yesterday at a discount rate of 0.005 percent, the lowest since it starting auctioning the securities in 1929. The U.S. also sold $30 billion of four-week bills today at zero percent for the first time since it began selling the debt in 2001.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since I was dreaming, I figured that I would somehow involve some of the cuter employees in some erotic fantasies, which I quickly discovered did not turn out as I had planned and made me question the whole &#8220;I must be dreaming&#8221; thing, even though according to Stephen Meyerhardt, &#8220;a spokesman for the Bureau of Public Debt in Washington&#8221;, he &#8220;wasn&#8217;t aware of the three-month bill ever trading at a negative rate before&#8221;, indicating that this MUST be a dream!</p>
<p>In fact, I thought those bad old days were all gone, all the demons exorcized, and that I had come to grips with insanely low interest rates and scumbag Wall Street and governmental sharpies, when suddenly I am again waking up in the middle of the night, bathed in sweat and screaming my guts out in fear, and again instinctively grabbing for some kind of weapon to unleash a maelstrom of hot, flying lead against unseen attackers and miscellaneous bric-a-brac.</p>
<p>Imagine my further disorientation when I suddenly find out that I cannot move, and am restrained to the bed by a profusion of straps and belts, and all I can do is struggle heroically against my shackles while I listen to my wife laughing and saying, &#8220;Try to get out of THAT, you Homicidal Mogambo Moron (HMM)!&#8221;</p>
<p>The reason for my relapse in symptoms is that Bloomberg.com reported that Treasury Assistant Secretary Karthik Ramanathan, &#8220;the department&#8217;s chief debt manager,&#8221; said that the United States faces &#8220;as much as $2 trillion in borrowing needs this year,&#8221; and warns us that they &#8220;may introduce new financing methods to sell a record amount of government debt&#8221;, requiring them to use &#8220;novel approaches to debt management.&#8221; Yikes!</p>
<p>I remember when I tried this &#8220;novel approach to debt management&#8221; scam one time early in my career when my natural incompetence and general lack of interest in a career started to manifest themselves, which predictably ended badly, although it looked so good on paper.</p>
<p>My &#8220;novel approach to debt management&#8221; was to loan the employee pension fund to me as my &#8220;seed money&#8221; for a big run at the Vegas casinos using some stupid new gambling &#8220;system&#8221; I developed back when I believed in the bell curve over the long-term, and which has, thanks to the phenomenon of catastrophic Black Swan events, now been shown to be a Big, Big Mistake (BBM), as if my subsequent experience in Vegas was not enough proof! Hahaha!</p>
<p>But apparently nobody wants to hear about how I lost so much of the employee&#8217;s money, or how a &#8220;novel approach to debt management&#8221; did not work out, or how I was personally embarrassed to have lost all their money while risking none of my own.</p>
<p>But perhaps people will be interested to know that the federal government is going to make sure that we are all losers, as inflation in consumer prices destroys us, which I cleverly deduce when Bloomberg said, &#8220;Ramanathan cited private analysts&#8217; estimates of borrowing needs that may reach $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion in the financial year that ends in September 2009.&#8221;</p>
<p>What? A $2 trillion federal budget deficit? In a $13 trillion national economy? Gaaahhhh! When the trade deficit is running at almost $900 billion a year? Double gaaahhhhh!</p>
<p>If you disregard my loud, terrified screaming as just a pathetic &#8220;cry for help&#8221;, you will realize that my underlying message is sound, and that it&#8217;s too, too weird, it&#8217;s too, too unprecedented, it&#8217;s too, too everything-bad-from-an-economic-perspective, and it is so all-around terrifying that even holding gold in one hand, and laying down some suppressive fire with a 0.45 caliber semiautomatic in the other to send a little &#8220;message&#8221; to the neighbors, provides but little solace.</p>
<p>A hell of a lot of noise, yes, but little solace! Hahaha! On the other hand, without the safety of gold, absolutely none of the latter!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/Writers/Mogambo/DREssays/MG122208.html">Source: A Novel Approach to Debt Management</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-novel-approach-to-debt-management/10528/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed May Cut Rates Again as Policymakers Meet</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-may-cut-rates-again-as-policymakers-meet/10066</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-may-cut-rates-again-as-policymakers-meet/10066#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOWM SNE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Funds Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loan Guarantees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Supplies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=10066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After U.S. Federal Reserve policymakers meet today (Monday) and tomorrow (Tuesday), most experts expect a half a percentage point cut in the benchmark Federal Funds Rate – which is already 1.0%.</p>
<p>That  doesn’t leave members of the central bank’s policymaking Federal Open Market  Committee (FOMC) <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/fed-rate-cut-2/" target="_blank">much room to  maneuver</a>. Still, the policymakers may have more ammunition in their arsenal and the statement that accompanies the rate decision at the end of the two-day session could shed some insight on the “creative” actions the Fed could consider in addition to rate cuts (For instance, the central bank could extend the new investment firm discount window, offer additional loan guarantees, or utilize any number of other tools).</p>
<p>And  the Fed may well have to&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After U.S. Federal Reserve policymakers meet today (Monday) and tomorrow (Tuesday), most experts expect a half a percentage point cut in the benchmark Federal Funds Rate – which is already 1.0%.</p>
<p>That  doesn’t leave members of the central bank’s policymaking Federal Open Market  Committee (FOMC) <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/fed-rate-cut-2/" target="_blank">much room to  maneuver</a>. Still, the policymakers may have more ammunition in their arsenal and the statement that accompanies the rate decision at the end of the two-day session could shed some insight on the “creative” actions the Fed could consider in addition to rate cuts (For instance, the central bank could extend the new investment firm discount window, offer additional loan guarantees, or utilize any number of other tools).</p>
<p>And  the Fed may well have to use those other tools. As Japan’s “<a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm" target="_blank">Lost  Decade</a>” demonstrated, “zero” interest rates won’t necessarily jump-start an economy – especially when interest rates weren’t really the problem. And as several <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a></em></strong> investigative pieces have demonstrated, the low  interest rates aren’t necessarily inducing banks to lend. Indeed, many <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/05/banking-buyouts/" target="_blank">banks are using  the federal bailout money to finance buyout deals</a>.</p>
<p>The ministers  of the <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/12/14/opecs_khelil_a_pragmatic_leader_in_testing_times/" target="_blank">Organization  of the Petroleum Exporting Countries</a> (OPEC) will meet in Algeria on Wednesday  and President <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/12/14/opecs_khelil_a_pragmatic_leader_in_testing_times/" target="_blank">Chakib  Khelil</a> implied that a surprisingly sizable production cut is in the cards.  While OPEC controls about 40% of the world’s oil supplies, energy analysts hold more stock in actions rather than words. Said one of those analysts: “You can announce all the cuts you want. Compliance is the key.&#8221;</p>
<h3><strong>Market  Matters </strong></h3>
<p>In a major story last week, <strong>Bank of America</strong> Corp. (BAC) may be  eliminating 35,000 jobs as it adds <strong>Merrill  Lynch</strong> <strong>&amp; Co. Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer" target="_blank">MER</a>) to its ever-growing list  of subsidiary companies.</p>
<p>But in an even bigger story, Wall Street powerbroker, Bernard Madoff stole the headlines (and about $50 billion from investors in the process).  This former chairman of the Nasdaq Stock Market Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ndaq" target="_blank">NDAQ</a>) ASDAQ was arrested  for committing perhaps the largest investor fraud in history (<strong>Enron</strong> may be off the hook) as <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=2320522" target="_blank">Bernard L Madoff  Investment Securities LLC</a><strong> </strong>appears to have been “basically a giant <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme" target="_blank">Ponzi</a> scheme” (his own words).  Though the client list seemed relatively small, at first, the implications will be quite widespread, as some of the largest hedge funds of funds participated in Madoff’s investments; their clients include some of the world’s (formerly) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/sports/baseball/14wilpon.html?em" target="_blank">wealthiest  folks</a>.  Additionally, regulators will have quite a few questions to answer as lax oversight failed to uncover this massive fraud that may have been perpetrated for years.  Stay tuned – this one isn’t going away any time soon.</p>
<p>In “lighter” news, the U.S. House of Representative passed a “preliminary” auto bailout package that would provide $14 billion to the Big Three – <strong>Ford Motor  Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=f" target="_blank">F</a>) </strong>may not need  any for now – and create a new <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/big-three-bailout-2/" target="_blank">car czar</a> to oversee an industry restructuring.  While Wall Street initially hailed the move as a positive step to a necessary overhaul, the Senate demanded greater concessions from auto unions and the bill became basically “dead on arrival.”  Since the U.S. Treasury Department appears to be growing more comfortable with the bailout concept with each passing day, Bush administration officials implied that aid via the $700 billion <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Emergency_Economic_Stabilization_fund" target="_blank">Troubled Assets Relief Program</a> (TARP) would be forthcoming even without Senate approval. By the way, an oversight committee gave the financial bailout a rather poor initial report card, claiming a lack of transparency in terms of how dollars are being spent and whether recipients are complying with government intentions (no wonder the automakers want to participate as well).</p>
<p>Elsewhere, Merrill’s <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=MER.N&amp;officerId=1072250" target="_blank">John  A. Thain</a> reversed an earlier position by “choosing” to forgo his 2008 bonus  and <strong>Morgan Stanley’s (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=MS" target="_blank">MS</a>)</strong> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=MS.N&amp;officerId=21139" target="_blank">John  J. Mack</a> quickly followed suit.  The <strong>Dow Chemical Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ADOW" target="_blank">DOW</a>)</strong>, <strong>Sony Corp. (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASNE" target="_blank">SNE</a>),</strong> and <strong>3M Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mmm" target="_blank">MMM</a>) </strong>joined BofA and  others in announcing sizable job cuts.  <strong>FedEx Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=FDX" target="_blank">FDX</a>) </strong>and The <strong>Procter &amp; Gamble</strong> <strong>Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=PG" target="_blank">PG</a>)</strong> reduced prior  outlooks and sales projections.</p>
<p>Oil prices fluctuated greatly as  traders weighed contrasting supply/demand reports:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The Energy Information Administration expects weak demand to result in declining consumption through 2009 even as significant production cuts could be announced at the upcoming OPEC meeting.</li>
<li>With oil trading below $47 a barrel, <strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=GS" target="_blank">GS</a>) </strong>(of “we’re going to $200/barrel fame”) contradicted past forecasts by claiming prices could fall to $30 (and lost some credibility in the process).</li>
</ul>
<p>Stocks reacted favorably to rumors of President-elect Barack Obama’s $500+ billion stimulus package (see below) and the apparent progress with automaker negotiations.  As the week moved on, reports of new job losses and more financial woes halted the brief optimism and the Senate’s inability to pass an auto bill brought more excessive volatility.  A “flight-to-quality” sentiment contributed to yields on 3-month T-bills dipping to 0.0% (that’s ZERO percent … talk about risk averse).</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="455" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2007)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (09/30/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(12/05/08)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(12/12/08)</strong></td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">13,264.82</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">10,850.66</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,635.42</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>8,629.68</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-34.94%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,652.28</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,091.88</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,509.31</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>1,540.72</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-41.91%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,468.36</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,164.74</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">876.07</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>879.73</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-40.09%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">766.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">679.58</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">461.09</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>468.43</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-38.85%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">4.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.00%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1.00%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>1.00%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-325 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">4.04%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.83%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.66%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>2.59%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-145 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Economically Speaking</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;I am absolutely confident that if we take the right steps over the coming months, that not only can we get the economy back on track, but we can emerge leaner, meaner and ultimately more competitive and more prosperous.&#8221;</p>
<p>Somehow an economic stimulus plan which directs $500+ billion into new FDR-like public works programs to increase employment does not necessarily imply “leaner and meaner.”  Still, many analysts believe the <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/08/obama-stimulus/" target="_blank">Obama plan</a> (still in its infancy) may be just the tonic needed to jumpstart the  economy.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the European Union announced its own $200 billion package as the 27 member countries struggle with global recession.  Not to be outdone, Japan revealed some sizable stimulus measures of its own late in the week.  With the recession already pushing a year in duration, Duke University released results of its Global Business Outlook Survey which showed that 60% of domestic CFOs believe the downturn will last until the 4th quarter of next year – and perhaps longer. Similarly, a<br />
Wall Street Journal forecasting survey predicted four straight quarters of negative growth as measured by gross domestic product, or GDP, the longest period of economic contraction since the Great Depression.</p>
<p>A light week on the economic calendar ended with a couple of major reports that gave the Fed a bit more anecdotal material to (over-)analyze prior to the FOMC meeting today and tomorrow. With claims for unemployment benefits soaring to their highest level since November 1982, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and friends must make job creation among their top priorities.  November retail sales fell by 1.8% as automakers reported their worst level of monthly activity in 26 years.</p>
<p>Still, the decline was less than Wall Street expected, leading Morgan Stanley’s analysts to speculate about future downward revisions.  Wholesale inflation (as measured by the producer price index, or PPI) declined by 2.2% as gasoline prices plummeted by 25% in November.  Normally, consumers would welcome such news and gladly spend those savings from the pumps at the malls during the holidays.  Instead economists continue to spread more “gloom and doom” by suggesting consumers may hoard their savings and resist spending amid these uncertain times.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic  Calendar </strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="476" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="149" valign="top"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="252" valign="top"><strong>Comments </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 11</td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Initial Jobless Claims (12/06)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top">Highest level    of claims in 26 years</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Balance of Trade (10/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top">Surprising increase on surge in    oil imports</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 12</td>
<td width="149" valign="top">PPI (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top">25+% drop in gas prices led to    2.2% overall decline</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Retail Sales (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top">A record 5th    consecutive monthly decline</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="149" valign="top"><strong></strong></td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 15</td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Industrial Production (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 16</td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Housing Starts (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="149" valign="top">CPI (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Fed Policy Meeting Statement</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 18</td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Initial Jobless Claims (12/13)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="149" valign="top">Leading Eco Indicators (11/08)</td>
<td width="252" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/15/fed-interest-rate/">Fed May Cut  Rates Again as Policymakers Meet</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-may-cut-rates-again-as-policymakers-meet/10066/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swiss National Bank Cut Rates 100 BPS!</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/swiss-national-bank-cut-rates-100-bps/8838</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/swiss-national-bank-cut-rates-100-bps/8838#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Butler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Dollar & Forex Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Currencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing starts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rate Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese Yen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss National Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US automakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Jobless Rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Trading Theme returns&#8230;  Automakers&#8217; bailout vote today&#8230;  Not using all your arrows&#8230;  Housing Starts go back to 1959! And Now&#8230; Today&#8217;s Pfennig!</p>
<p>OK&#8230; Whew! What an awful day yesterday for the currencies&#8230; In the morning, they ere in rally mode with the euro gaining ground to well within the 1.27 handle. But then the Trading Theme set in, and those gains were wiped out. The Trading Theme was set off by the awful Housing data, which reminded everyone of the deep, dark , dangerous days ahead&#8230; I bought some euros, and watched them rise, and went off to do something else&#8230; When I returned, they had fallen&#8230; UGH! The Japanese yen, however, rallied, as is the case with the Trading Theme&#8230;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trading Theme returns&#8230;  Automakers&#8217; bailout vote today&#8230;  Not using all your arrows&#8230;  Housing Starts go back to 1959! And Now&#8230; Today&#8217;s Pfennig!</p>
<p>OK&#8230; Whew! What an awful day yesterday for the currencies&#8230; In the morning, they ere in rally mode with the euro gaining ground to well within the 1.27 handle. But then the Trading Theme set in, and those gains were wiped out. The Trading Theme was set off by the awful Housing data, which reminded everyone of the deep, dark , dangerous days ahead&#8230; I bought some euros, and watched them rise, and went off to do something else&#8230; When I returned, they had fallen&#8230; UGH! The Japanese yen, however, rallied, as is the case with the Trading Theme&#8230; Risk trades get unwound, which benefits dollars, and yen. I&#8217;ve explained all this before, so I won&#8217;t get into it again, but there&#8217;s someone that has gone into the problems (credit markets and the Fed and Treasury&#8217;s response to the crisis), and does a great job of telling it like it is&#8230; So, instead of hearing from me, ranting and cursing the &#8220;leaders&#8221; I&#8217;ll let someone else explain it to you&#8230; This is a fellow named Ted Cook, that Ty Keough sent my way&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;One hardly knows where to begin. America has currently embraced the monetary policies of a banana republic. The Argentine and Zimbabwe models cannot be far behind. For years (35 to be exact) we have warned about the consequences of unbridled credit expansion. We argued that artificially low interest rates would lead to catastrophe. Now the first installment of this crisis has been visited upon us. Our policymakers have greeted this dilemma with even more ruinous money and credit policies that compound the problem. We’ve had the earthquake. The Tsunami is yet to come.</p>
<p>The monetary authorities in Washington, who are supposedly the brightest among us, have adopted a short-term strategy resplendent with economic error. As usual, the politicians are clueless. Somehow the idea has gained ground that recklessly expanding money and credit (inflating) will cure our economic ills without repercussions. Nothing could be further from the truth. This is currency debasement on a grand scale.&#8221;</p>
<p>OK&#8230; Back to me&#8230; I see where Iceland is getting $2.1 Billion from the IMF, and $2.5 Billion from the Nordic Countries of Finland, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark to help resurrect the Icelandic economy. Seems like it&#8217;s a case of too little too late to me, but maybe this can unlock the markets there a bit. For those of you keeping score at home, we received a price of 182.10 on our Icelandic currency this week. Now&#8230; I know there are people out there that don&#8217;t believe that we receive a price like this when the Central Bank posts a daily figure of around 139&#8230;</p>
<p>But let me tell you how this all works&#8230; I think the easiest way to explain this is to look at the Wall Street Journal, or most newspapers&#8217; business section, and you&#8217;ll see the Fed Reserve rates for currencies that day. Since currencies only really trade at the level that&#8217;s posted in the paper for a mili-second, it&#8217;s merely used as a reference. It&#8217;s not an indication where trades are being bought and sold.</p>
<p>Then there was the Housing data yesterday&#8230; October Housing Starts fell 4.5%, and Building Permits fell 12%! OUCH! That&#8217;s just awful data! The Housing Starts fell to an annual rate of 791,000, which is the lowest since records began in 1959! That&#8217;s 1959 folks! I hadn&#8217;t even started kindergarten yet! We hadn&#8217;t even launched Alan Shepard into space yet! Oh, the Soviets were way ahead of us at that time, only to be caught and passed later&#8230; But I digress, with this space exploration talk!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to try to get everyone&#8217;s attention away from the awful Housing data, like the media would do&#8230; I think of the cable news people doing this story, something like this: &#8220;Today, we saw the October Housing Starts fall 4.5%, and how about Paris Hilton breaking up with her boyfriend yesterday?&#8221;</p>
<p>OK, I&#8217;m back now, the research team over at JP Morgan sent out a note to clients yesterday, telling them that they believe the Fed will cut interest rates to zero by the next two meetings, Dec. 16, and Jan 28, and leave them there for the rest of 2009. Recall, that I wrote about how I believed the Fed was going to cut rates to zero about a month ago? I said then that the Fed is thinking that they can be &#8220;Saved by Zero&#8221;&#8230; Well&#8230; It&#8217;s nice to see the BIG research teams jump on my bandwagon!</p>
<p>I guess, the Nestea Plunge in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) yesterday convinced them to make that call&#8230; October CPI took the biggest Plunge in 61 years by falling 1% in the month!</p>
<p>Falling asset prices&#8230; Falling inflation (so they say)&#8230; Falling Home prices&#8230; And Falling Job Creation&#8230; This is getting pretty ugly folks&#8230; And here&#8217;s Jimmy Buffett (a reader reminded me of this!) I don&#8217;t know &#8212;- I don&#8217;t know &#8212; I don&#8217;t know where I&#8217;m gonna go when the volcano blows. Mr. Utley! (you can hear those steel drums playing in your head now can&#8217;t you?)</p>
<p>I ran some numbers last week for our monthly newsletter to clients, called the Review &amp; Focus, (shameless plug) because I wanted to see if our age-old portfolio theory thought about how diversifying your investment portfolio reduces the overall risk of your portfolio, was holding true, given the currency sell of since July&#8230; Lo and Behold, it&#8217;s tru, it&#8217;s tru, I did see a putty tat! Yes, with the S&amp;P 500 off more than 39% in the past year, a $100,000 investment in the S&amp;P would not have done you very good&#8230; But by allocated 20% to Gold, and 20% to 3 currencies, euros, Swiss, and yen, and you can even substitute Aussie to prove the point even more&#8230; You are left with far more money in your portfolio, than if you did not diversify.</p>
<p>So&#8230; Yes, the currencies have fallen on difficult times since July, but they are still doing their work as a risk reducing machine for investment portfolios&#8230; Interesting&#8230; Those are the facts, Jack!</p>
<p>Today&#8230; The Data Cupboard will yield, the Weekly Initial Jobless Claims, which last week jumped above 500K&#8230; I would look for this to remain above 500K&#8230; And that my friends, is not a good thing. We&#8217;ll also see the Philly Fed Index (manufacturing), and one of my fave data pieces, Leading Indicators&#8230; If everyone would have paid attention to the Leading Indicators in the last year, they were telling us that something was wrong&#8230; And I believe they&#8217;ll still indicate something still is going wrong, as they are forecast to post a negative -.6% print for October&#8230;</p>
<p>The Data Cupboard will be emptied after today, with nothing to report tomorrow.</p>
<p>In the Eurozone&#8230; ECB member Nowotny made a clever comment that has helped the euro a bit this morning&#8230; Nowotny was talking about interest rates cuts and said, &#8220;it makes perfect sense not to use all your firepower at once.&#8221; Like I always say about not using all the arrows in your quiver! Yes, this is what I was referring to yesterday when I was talking to a long time customer&#8230; I said that the ECB would be more pragmatic when it came to their rate cuts&#8230; Yes, they participated in the coordinated round of rate cuts, and they cut rates 50 BPS at the last meeting&#8230; But&#8230; I believe they will pause for the cause, and take a look at what their two previous rate cuts did to the economic landscape before going off and cutting rates like there&#8217;s no tomorrow.</p>
<p>Speaking of rate cuts&#8230; The Swiss National Bank (SNB) decided to take the plunge this morning and take out their yield that&#8217;s offered&#8230; The SNB cut rates 100 BPS! That&#8217;s crazy man! Crazy!</p>
<p>Speaking of crazy&#8230; The automakers were on Capitol Hill yesterday pleading for some bailout money&#8230; I understand that the proceedings were a bit heated at times, as well they should be! I think there will be a vote today on whether the Big 3 get some additional bailout money&#8230; You might recall that they already received $25 Billion to put toward alternative fuel vehicles&#8230; Yeah, I bet it went there, right? Oh, that&#8217;s right, I see a whole line of alternative fuel cars rolling off the lines right now! NOT! If I were in charge of the purse strings here, I don&#8217;t think I would give them a dime, until they demonstrated that they will change&#8230;</p>
<p>And&#8230; Finally, before I head to the Big Finish&#8230; Did you happen to see or hear or read any of the conversation between Sen. Ron Paul, and Big Ben Bernanke? Oh, this is classic stuff! <a href="http://news.goldseek.com/RonPaul/1227028538.php">Here&#8217;s a link to a site that has the video of the back and forth between these two</a>&#8230; Simply classic!</p>
<p>Currencies today 11/20/08: A$ .6305, kiwi .54, C$ .7955, euro 1.2545, sterling 1.4865, Swiss .8210, ISK 182.10, rand 10.5675, krone 7.0740, SEK 8.15, forint 215.15, zloty 3.0740, koruna 20.43, yen 95.70, baht 35.15, sing 1.5290, HKD 7.75, INR 50.15, China 6.8342, pesos 13.40, BRL 2.3890, dollar index 87.62, Oil $52.15, Silver $9.39, and Gold&#8230; $745.50</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailypfennig.com/currentIssue.aspx?date=11/20/2008">Source: SNB Cut Rates 100 BPS! </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/swiss-national-bank-cut-rates-100-bps/8838/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.387 seconds -->
