Their erudition and their education, would, it was felt, help them steer a coalition Government hobbled by Left parties with antediluvian ideas of economic growth, on a sensible path. For four years, it seemed things were going well, with the Indian economy growing at 8% and pouring enormous amounts of tax revenues to the Government. The triumvirate, alas, forgot what they had learnt in economics classes and succumbed to the politics of survival. We will now pay the price of neglect to plan for the future.

Poor governance matters. Look at Vietnam, till now one of the tiger economies, whose fast economic growth attracted a lot of foreign capital and created a stockmarket boom. The growth was not managed. The stockmarket has fallen 70% from its peak and every single day in April was a downtick! Look at Zimbabwe, where Robert Mugabe’s neglect has turned a country once the rice bowl of Africa, feeding other nations, into one that has to beg for food as it is bankrupt. Look at North Korea where upward of 1 m. people will die of famine as the great leader chases his nuclear nightmare.

Luckily India has democracy, and democratic institutions. But economic realities must be faced, such as rising crude oil prices unable to sustain untargeted subsidies, without fully prostrating to political compulsions. The triumverate ought to have been protected from political interference, much as Narasimha Rao did when Manmohan was the Prime Minister!

GDP growth is expected to slow down this year, though we should still be over 8%. If services, which account for 55% of the economy, continue growing at above 10%, that provides 5.5% GDP growth; industry, which accounts for 28%, growing at 7% (as in April), would provide another 2% and agriculture, accounting for 18% would, with a 3% growth, chip in with 0.5%, adding up to 8%. Or more, with higher growth in any sector.

The irony is that the resources generated during the past four years in terms of tax revenues, have not been spent in ensuring the future. Most of it has been wasted in political gestures, such as the subsidy on petroleum products. Only a small fraction, perhaps not even a tenth, goes to the truly deserving, who would need subsidised kerosene and LPG as fuel for cooking.

This population could provided the subsidy in a more effective way, using technology, without needing a blanket low price for all. The kerosene mafia, which adulterates diesel with subsidised kerosene, is a beneficiary of this largesse, as are car owners who are not discouraged from buying fuel guzzling cars. (Belatedly, the Government has woken up to its responsibility and levied a special excise of upto Rs 20,000 on fuel guzzlers; too little, too late). Contrast this with Indonesia, where the Government had the cajones to hike petrol prices by 30% last year. Demand for oil has fallen 10% since.

The BJP Government had, when in power, hiked petrol and diesel prices by an equal amount, even though the underlying crude oil price growth was much less. However, it did it in 34 small increases, without attracting public fury, instead of one large one, leading to protests. (Ironically the protestors were the very people who prevented the small hikes). So even when politics comes into economics, management of it becomes important.

Kerosene coupons, much like food coupons in America, would be one way of better targeting subsidies to reach only the intended beneficiaries. Modern day technologies like smart cards embedded with chips to distribute products can also be used. The Government could, and should, have used buoyant tax revenues to develop resources using floating turbines to generate wind power and wave power technology to generate power from waves is now advanced enough to make it equivalent to nuclear power, which would give the Government an alternative. India, with its huge coastline, would be able to develop this, had the priorities of nation building been determine by strategic thinking and economics instead of populism and accommodative politics!

Because prices of petrol and diesel have been subsidised, there is no price effect on its consumption, resulting in a ballooning import bill for crude oil. This leads to a current account deficit, taken care of by capital inflows. To attract which, and to control inflation (which in the last week of May touched a 7 year high of 8.75%), interest rates would need to be raised. RBI did just that, raising the repo rate (the one at which it lends to banks) by a quarter percentage, to 8%. The interest rate cycle is turning up, globally, which would negatively affect equity markets.

With all these untargeted, hence largely wasteful, subsidies on oil, on fertilizers, with the increase in salary after the pay commission hike and with the farm loan waiver, the Government’s fiscal position is atrocious, which is why foreign investors have been selling in spades. Which is also why the Government approved a procurement price of Rs 850/quintal for wheat, lower than the Rs 1000 recommended by CAC.

There was a lot of interesting corporate news. The promoters of Ranbaxy, India’s largest pharma company, agreed to sell their 34% stake to Japanese Dai Ichi Sankyo at a price significantly higher than market price, which consequently shot up. Dai Ichi will make an open offer for 20% at the same price, of Rs 737 per share.

Reliance Communication, which is planning a merger with MTN of South Africa which would be the largest deal from India, will have to face another complication. (The cap on foreign investment in telecom is a major complication which calls for a convoluted route to takeover). Reliance Industries has claimed that it has the right of first refusal if R Com is sold.

Idea Cellular is taking over Spice, in which Telekom Malaysia has a 39.5% stake. Post merger and preferential allotment, it would end up with 20%.

The India story is still good, largely due to the demographic dividend, with a young, well educated population who are free to pursue dreams. At a recent analyst meet of NIIT it was pointed out that India will have an addition of some 47 m. educated people in the 19-25 age group. The rest of the world (including China) will have a reduction of some 53 m. in this age group. Given proper governance, and a polity that cares for the future of the country more than for its longevity, there is no reason why the boom should not continue for years. Given good governance!

Last week the sensex fell sharply by 506 points on opening day (high oil prices, weak Dow), rallied thereafter, then fell again, to close down 382 points at 15181. The Nifty fell 110 points to end at 4517.

It is possible that the sensex can rally to over 16,000 level. One could exit if it does, for thereafter, at some point, early elections may be called. Oil prices are likely to fall, which would help control inflation. The inflationary environment would probably be most benign in Nov and Dec. An election then may probably be seen to be in the best interest of the ruling Government.

Source: Investing in India – What They Didn’t Teach Them at Harvard!

Yet India remains one of the world’s great growth opportunities and investors at this level may well be getting in on the ground floor of a very major long-term profit play.

Let me explain …

India’s economy expanded at a breezy 9% clip last year. The rate of growth is expected to throttle back to about 8% this year, but that’s still excellent, justifying fairly lofty price-earnings ratios in the local stock market. Even so, market valuations there do not now appear excessive; the overall market is trading at about 18 times earnings, which is not particularly high given the economy’s growth potential.

As with China, if India can get its house in order – both politically and economically – we’re looking at the very real prospect of very rapid growth before that country’s standard of living starts to approach that of the West, causing India’s rate of growth to slow dramatically.

The bottom line: With 1.1 billion potential Indian consumers, we’re looking at a huge potential purchasing power for all kinds of consumer products.
Now, there are some potential pitfalls to be concerned about in the near term.

For instance, the current Indian government, in office since 2004, is a coalition between the Congress Party, which had ruled India for most of the period since independence, though without any great success, and the Communists (who are a pretty mild lot, but are nevertheless pro-government and fairly anti-market).

Although India Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is a moderate, the government as a whole has seen India’s economic emergence as an opportunity to fund favorite projects and social programs. For instance, this year’s budget proposes an 18% increase in public spending for the 12 months that end next March, over and above the 24% increase in public spending for the year-to-March 2008. Even after several years of rapid growth, the state budget deficit (the federal shortfall plus the local deficit) is around 7% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). With any kind of downturn at all, that 7% could quickly swell to 10% – a point at which deficits become difficult to finance.

Now there is some hope on the horizon – an election is due in May 2009, at the latest, and the center-right opposition is currently leading in opinion polls. Even so, shrewd investing veterans know better than to rely on that alone for their investment profits.

The other current problem is inflation, right now running at 8% per annum, which means that it’s higher than the level of short-term domestic interest rates. Higher commodity and energy prices have affected India as they have other countries: India’s position is made more difficult by the poverty that afflicts much of the population. The Indian government, like the good socialists that they are, has seen fit to restrict exports of rice and to subsidize other foods and gasoline (the latter makes no sense socially, since automobiles are largely owned by the middle classes, not the poor). Needless to say, these subsidies and restrictions make the budget deficit worse; and they will pose an additional problem in the future, when they are lifted and consumer prices soar in response.

Having described some of the challenges that India faces, let’s be clear on a very key point: No market is perfect. Ironically, if it were, it would be a much less alluring investment opportunity. I mean, let’s face it: If India didn’t face the problems that we’ve detailed here, the market would be trading at a hefty 40 times earnings, well above its current multiple of 18.

The underlying truth remains that economic growth has achieved real momentum in India, that any government we can picture will do no more than slow the country’s economy incrementally, and that the economics of providing manufacturing and services from a base in India – especially in the era of the Internet – is so compelling from a cost and logistical standpoint that it must inevitably continue to produce huge profits for long-term investors for decades to come.

When it comes to India, it’s almost as if the central question no longer is “how much should I invest in India?” but rather “how can I afford not to invest in India?”

Let’s take a look at how best to invest in this fast-growing economy.

India Profit Plays

The simplest way to invest in India is via an Exchange Traded Note (ETN), in this case the Barclays IPath India Index ETN (INP), whose returns are linked to the Morgan Stanley Capital International India Index (unlike a conventional ETF, an ETN is technically a 30-year note, so it distributes assets to holders at the end of 30 years). In January, INP was trading at about a 15% premium to its net asset value (NAV). But now it’s trading very close to its NAV, having slipped backward.

As an alternative you might consider the Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) or the India Fund (IFN), both actively managed funds investing in India, which currently trade at discounts to NAV of 2.0% and 0.3% respectively.

Individual shares to look at would include Infosys Technologies Ltd., (INFY) the India-based software giant, which following the fall in the Indian market has declined to a fairly reasonable 19 times earnings, or 16 times next year’s earnings.

Another possibility is the pharmaceutical company, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. (RDY), which, as a major generic drugs manufacturer, can expect to benefit from the expiration of many U.S. pharmaceutical patents in the next five years, and right now carries a P/E ratio of only 15.

Finally, you might consider an India-based automaker that’s been in the news a lot recently: Tata Motors Ltd. (TTM), which is trading at only 11 times earnings, reflecting the risk involved in a medium-sized company taking on the world automotive industry. In the luxury end of the market, Tata recently bought Jaguar and Land Rover from Ford Motor Co. (F), for $2.3 billion. At the economy end of the market, Tata has announced the Nano, a car for the Indian market that will sell for $2,500 – 40% cheaper than any other car on the world market. And that’s after Tata had a smash hit with a light truck designed for the India market, as well.

As I’ve previously articulated in several Money Morning articles, it is highly likely that – years from now – the worldwide center of auto-making will migrate from Detroit to someplace in either China or India, or both, thanks to the combined allure of low costs and potentially huge consumer markets. That means that Tata, as India’s largest manufacturer, is likely to be a key player in the global auto market of the future.

So if you know what the ultimate outcome of that global game is going to be, why not deal yourself a winning hand right now, and then sit back and wait for this scenario (and your profits) to play out?