<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; Michael Gross</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/michael-gross/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Base Metals React Little to the Rate Cut</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/base-metals-react-little-to-the-rate-cut/1713</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/base-metals-react-little-to-the-rate-cut/1713#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Casey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gold Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Base Metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Codelco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Commodity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grupo Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrial Metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metals Copper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wachovia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zinc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/base-metals-react-little-to-the-rate-cut/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="maintextDRP">The base metals were mixed on Wednesday. Copper bottomed in the pre-dawn hours, then was up through most of the day, finishing at $3.9472/lb., up almost 2¼ cents. </p>
<p class="maintextDRP">Nickel blasted back over $13.10 in the late morning, but then fell sharply to close at $12.8374/lb., down almost 5 cents. Zinc was up and down with little change, ending at $1.0024/lb., down less than a quarter of a cent. Aluminum sagged to $1.307/lb., down 1 2/3 cents, while lead was marginally higher at $1.2228/lb., up two-tenths of a cent.</p>
<p>The Fed’s action had little effect on the industrial metals, with copper rising slightly on what analysts tabbed as primarily short covering.</p>
<p>Volume was light, as most of the trading came before the Fed weighed&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="maintextDRP">The base metals were mixed on Wednesday. Copper bottomed in the pre-dawn hours, then was up through most of the day, finishing at $3.9472/lb., up almost 2¼ cents.<span id="more-1713"></span> </p>
<p class="maintextDRP">Nickel blasted back over $13.10 in the late morning, but then fell sharply to close at $12.8374/lb., down almost 5 cents. Zinc was up and down with little change, ending at $1.0024/lb., down less than a quarter of a cent. Aluminum sagged to $1.307/lb., down 1 2/3 cents, while lead was marginally higher at $1.2228/lb., up two-tenths of a cent.</p>
<p>The Fed’s action had little effect on the industrial metals, with copper rising slightly on what analysts tabbed as primarily short covering.</p>
<p>Volume was light, as most of the trading came before the Fed weighed in.</p>
<p>Also factoring in was the slight rise in GDP, as expected, with speculators hoping that that signals a rise in future demand.</p>
<p>The strike against state-owned Codelco in Chile continued, but even down there, “All eyes are on the Fed,” said Bart Melek, global commodity strategist with BMO Capital Markets.</p>
<p>Melek went on to say that strike participants were mostly “keeping their powder dry” ahead of the interest rate announcement.</p>
<p>Supply data came in slightly bearish yesterday. Inventories monitored by the LME rose 875 metric tons, to 110,525 tons.</p>
<p>Had the Fed’s rhetoric indicated a more hawkish stance on inflation is coming down the road, “we wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see a bit of a correction here in copper,” said Michael Gross, of <em>OptionSellers.com</em>. Gross added that over the next month the metal could pull back to the $3 to $3.25 range.</p>
<p>But with no clear signal given, prices are likely to “continue to move sideways” within a $3.85 to just over $4 range, said Eric Wittenauer, analyst with Wachovia Securities.</p>
<p>In company news, Grupo Mexico said on Monday that its plans to ramp up output at its giant Cananea copper pit have been delayed indefinitely after a labor board declared a 9-month-long strike there legal.</p>
<p>Grupo Mexico hoped to have significant production by May but plans were stifled by new worker blockades this month. “At this point, we are unable to provide a revised copper production guidance for the remainder of the year and the date at which we will resume operations is not currently foreseeable,” said CFO Daniel Muniz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/base-metals-react-little-to-the-rate-cut/1713/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.168 seconds -->

