The theme of my book, The Left, the Right, and the State, is that both sides of the political aisle represent a grave threat to liberty — though each of a different sort.  It is like two people tugging at a turkey’s wishbone: the turkey is liberty, and you are the bone.

We’ve lived through eight years of the threat from the Right. It was all about nationalism, militarism, war, torture, state secrets, attacks on privacy, the use of tax funds to subsidize “conservative values,” the outsourcing of government in a fascistic business-government partnership, the banning of products and services that government doesn’t like, the regimentation of educational life, government impositions in the name of security, and so on.

With the end of the Bush years, many of these threats have receded, if only slightly. Consider the problem of nationalism, for example. The neoconservatives who ran the country during the last two Bush terms exploited this dangerous impulse for all it was worth.

If you were not for their wars, you were against America, and hence deserving of jail without trial. The whole ideological apparatus of the Bush years was profoundly anti-intellectual, and while the neocons shouted down anyone who compared their administration to the Third Reich or Mussolini, the ideological comparison was actually quite apt: right-wing government control stems from the same motives of exalting security, discipline, and chauvinism above liberty.

In two short months, however, that ethos has subsided, and it has been replaced by a threat from the Left. It is tragic that Obama should be president at all. If we had a position called “national well-wisher,” “national greeter,” or “national symbol of accomplishment,” he would be perfect for the job. He is elegant, graceful, and articulate, and he inspires people in an unusual way. As chief policymaker, however, he has revealed himself as nothing more than a two-bit socialist.

After all the ghastly statism of the Bush years, you might think that the Left would back off from using power to achieve its aims. Instead, they have learned nothing. The Left has been lying in wait for its chance. As the Obama people entered the White House, it was as if they found a closet labeled “failed ideas of the past.” They opened it and the contents spilled everywhere. They started grabbing things and putting them in the regulatory books and in legislation.

What an amazing pile of junky, worn-out, bogus policy ideas! Equal pay for equal work. Infrastructure spending. More money to the public schools. Socialized medicine. Rock-bottom interest rates. Welfare! Every wish granted by government. Down with business. Down with business failures. Curbs on fat-cat pay. Down with Wall Street. Turn on the money spigots. Expropriate the expropriators. Subsidies for every lifestyle that flies in the face of bourgeois prejudice.

Thus are we again reminded of what a profound threat the Left represents to liberty. It’s been more than a decade now since we’ve seen this at work, and probably longer really. Clinton was a pain, but he was smart enough not to take his reigning ideological framework too seriously. He actually showed some deference to reality from time to time.

The Obamaites are different. They are woefully ignorant of economics. They seem to actually believe all that socialist claptrap that has provided an excuse for innumerable foreign dictators: the idea that government is the source of wealth and can make anything happen with the push of a button.

They see no limits to the possibility that government can make society perfect, righting every perceived social injustice, and bringing prosperity to all via stealing from the haves and giving it to the have-nots. Is there inequality? Mandate equality. Is there deprivation? Provide! Recession? Spend hundreds of billions!

What we have here is not just a profound love of the state; it is a profound confidence in the capacity of the unlimited state to create heaven on earth. How does this square with the idea of human liberty, of social cooperation, and of the rights of all? Herein lies the great mystery of leftism. The Left seems oblivious to the relationship between their chosen means and their ends. It’s not that they hate liberty as such; it is that they believe that it must always take a backseat to other social priorities, like equality. In the end, they have a tendency to build the total state and find themselves taken aback when the whole of society ends up in a cage.

Those Obamaites! So compassionate, loving, universally minded, progressive — except that their ideological cousins managed to starve and destroy whole civilizations. Loyalty to their creed means death, because their ideology is the pathway to the gulag — and for one simple reason: their preferred means of social change is the state. The state is always and everywhere a threat to liberty, and liberty is the basic building block of prosperity and civilization.

Despite the slogans about progress, the upshot of the Obama administration is as deeply reactionary as anything that Bush conjured up. Despite all the hype and hope, what Obama offers is nothing new. It amounts to the robber state and the regimentation of society, a plan that will kill off prosperity and the conditions that allow for it.

The Republicans are right to fight this tendency at every turn, for it represents a radical attack on all things truly American. Worse still, by playing with the printing presses, the policy tendency here is also deeply dangerous. It could destroy the dollar internationally and domestically, igniting a hyperinflation that no one will be able to control once it gets going. One only wishes that the Republicans had been so principled when their president was in charge!

The Obama administration says that we have to give the stimulus time to work. No need. The stimulus will not work. If we manage to pull ourselves out of this slump, it will be despite and not because of this stimulus package.

When putting together my book, I wondered which threat was actually more dangerous for us, the Right or the Left. I’m still not sure, for national socialism and international socialism are in close competition.  I ended up focusing on both.

Source: The Left in Power

Obama as Prime Mover will have to turn the chaos in America’s housing and mortgage market into harmonious order. Then He has to single-handedly leap a tall legacy of toxic assets in a single bound, freeing up banks to lend by buying all of their dodgy assets.

It’s a big ask. But if anyone can do it, He can. Especially when He’s got America’s credit rating to abuse!

Reordering the financial universe is not cheap. It takes a lot of energy and a lot of matter in the form of new U.S. dollars. Reuters reports that, “Goldman Sachs estimated that it would take on the order of $4 trillion to buy troubled mortgage and consumer debt. That number could shrink if the program were limited to only certain loans or banks, but it could also grow if other asset classes such as commercial real estate loans were included.”

How much is $4 trillion? “At $4 trillion, that would be the equivalent of nearly 1/3 of U.S. gross domestic product. If the government had to fund that amount by issuing additional debt, it would intensify investor concerns about massive supply scaring off demand.”

Yes. You can imagine the world’s main owners of dollar-denominated reserve assets (China, Japan, the Petro states) would be intensely concerned about a $4 trillion increase in dollar denominated debt. But wait a tick…

It’s one thing to say you might need to float as much as $4 trillion in debt to fund your bad bank. It’s another thing to sell that debt? Who will buy it? Even these days, $4 trillion is a lot of capital to loan. Maybe that number has been floated to make a smaller number, say $2 trillion, look small by comparison.

Good news everyone! The Bad Bank is going to cost us half as much as we thought!

If the ‘big bang’ goes off this week, what will it mean for Planet U.S. Dollar? Or Planet Gold? Well, as our friend Steve Belmont in Chicago reported on Friday, gold is moving toward a day of reckoning after trading in a range for the last ten months. It will either break out much higher, Steve says, or buckle. We’ll be watching.

Did you notice the obnoxious change in political rhetoric this weekend? You knew Barrack Obama was going to give it to Wall Street, calling executives “shameful” for getting bonuses while their firms received TARP money. Remember, by the way, the TARP money was forced on some firms in an effort to boost confidence in the overall plan.

We normally try to keep a reserved, ironic, and sceptical air when reading the statements of politicians. Most of them are not worth taking seriously. But every once in a while, you get the scent of something so noxious and dangerous that you have to put aside humour and call it what is. Today is one of those days.

Now, the populist shame game is to be expected. That’s not a big deal. What’s more alarming is the bilge and claptrap spilling from Kevin Rudd’s gob and what it may mean for your ability to preserve and create wealth in the coming years.

In The Monthly, Rudd plants a Neo-Marxist flag in the ground of the current debate with the kind of jargon-laden elitist preening that makes academic critics of the free market (who’ve never spent a day in the business world creating value) so nauseating.

Specifically, Rudd writes that, “The time has come, off the back of the current crisis, to proclaim that the great neo-liberal experiment of the past 30 years has failed, that the emperor has no clothes. Neo-liberalism, and the free-market fundamentalism it has produced, has been revealed as little more than personal greed dressed up as an economic philosophy.”

Why not proclaim, since he is apparently in the position to make such proclamations, that the experiment in paper money and the deliberate policy of inflation it implies is theft? It is bureaucratic lust for power and authority disguised as monetary policy? It’s also, at its heart, the belief that one or a few people in government know better than you how you should lead your life.

Leave it to Rudd and the resurgent global Left to use the present crisis as an occasion to expand their political ideology of government power and wealth confiscation. Despite the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, Marxism never really went away. It ensconced itself in Western universities and colleges, and in the careerism of the political class, which believes it is entitled to govern by virtue of its intellectual superiority and the moral justness of its anti-market position.

Their strategy, as always, is to control the rhetorical high ground by framing the discussion in populist terms and making an enemy of “greedy capitalists.” Don’t get us wrong. There are plenty of greedy capitalists to go around, or to go to jail. In fact, many more of them would be going out of business if the government would quit propping them up with taxpayer money. This generation of corporate executives shares plenty of blame for playing fast and loose with the corporations they were supposed to be stewards of. They over-levered, over-speculated, and over-paid themselves.

But Rudd is an ignoramus of the lowest order to say that current events somehow negate the last thirty years of globalisation, or three hundred years of economic growth and the division of labour. Tens of millions have been lifted out of poverty. Hundreds of millions have more economic and political freedom than ever before.

These results can only be the product of a system in which risk taking entrepreneurs have access to capital and savings, allocated through competitive markets where firms that deliver real value to consumers thrive and those that don’t fail. That system has worked for 300 years of Western history to create wealth, choice, and opportunity.

Shame on Kevin Rudd for calling that “market fundamentalism”, as if belief in the institutions that create wealth and liberty is akin to the same kind of religious fundamentalism that permits suicide bombing. If there is a more offensive use of rhetoric to equate two vastly different things, we haven’t seen it.

But the Neo-Marxists are back on the march. And they are probably coming for your wages and pension sometime soon. Make no mistake about it. 2009 is the year the Neo-Marxists have been waiting for.

It is their chance to undo all the perceived evils of Thatcher and Reagan. There would be plenty of those to undo, of course, not least the idea that deficit spending is morally permissible. But the real push by the Neo-Marxists is to use the present occasion to expand the scope and reach of government power into your private life, so they can tell you what to do, what to watch, what to eat, what car to drive, and ultimately, what to think or say.

This will be disguised as better more “parental” regulation to achieve more equality and social justice. But behind the false populist outrage and the elevated language of idealism, it’s just another push for government elites to expand their ability to compel you to live the life they think you should lead.

The simple regulatory response to all this is to reduce the amount of leverage available to financial players. Reduce margin lending in shares. Let bankers get back to making prudent loans in the housing market based on what a buyer can actually repay, rather than letting the government subsidise subprime lending because it’s politically desirable.

There are other sensible regulatory responses to the mess. But they will be discarded in favour of grandiose and over-reaching plans to redesign the entire world in some utopian image. A “big bang”? Really. Does that mean they’re going to blow things up and call it a “fix?”

What we’re getting at is that it’s going to be a tremendous challenge to withstand this push in the next few years, mostly because it will have so much popular support from people with no brains who believe in fine sounding speeches and appreciate getting tax rebates/credits/handouts from the government. The first battle in the war on wealth creation is wealth redistribution, whether you like it or not.

It would be more honest if the Left just came out and said something like, “The last ten years have been a huge wealth transfer from the middle class to Wall Street and from the developing world to the developed world. We’re going to try and reverse all that now because we know it’s our best shot in the last thirty years to get some back. So here we come! Open your wallet and shut your mouth!”

Neo-liberalism isn’t the culprit in all this. What does that word even mean? Isn’t Rudd using it because it sounds like Neo-Conservatism? And everyone knows that Neo-conservatism is evil, therefore Neo-Liberalism must be evil too!

The real evil of the last thirty years is the vast expansion of credit in the world that changed personal and corporate incentives. The plunge in the cost of capital-encouraged by governments and Central Banks-set of an orgy of bad risk taking, quietly condoned by regulators and politicians who all benefitted in some way from housing/commodity/trade booms.

But now the credit cycle has turned. The Credit Depression is upon us. And Comrades Rudd and Obama will try and use it for the next great push in the Neo-Marxist dream, one world government with one world currency. More on that tomorrow!

Source: Marxism Marches On

This from Today’s Financial News:

We’ve already taken double-digit gains on Aastrom Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:ASTM),  Cerus Corporation (NASDAQ:CERS), and Geron Corporation (NASDAQ:GERN).

But these stocks are by no means done with their upward momentum.

Biotech companies continue to be a great investment – and these three are some of the best out there.

As the market takes another hit and these stocks artificially deflate, I recommend that TFN investors should again pick up shares.

And I’ve found another company that I believe is on the verge of a breakout.

But first, what’s so great about the three companies I selected in November? Let’s review…
Aastrom Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:ASTM) develops products for the repair or regeneration of human tissue. It’s proprietary Tissue Repair Cell (TRC) technology involves autologous, mixed-cell products containing stem and early progenitor cells to treat cardiac and vascular tissue regeneration.

The company launched Phase II IMPACT-DCM clinical trials for the evaluation its Cardiac Repair Cells (CRCs) in the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or congestive heart failure. DCM is a contributing factor in at least 250,000 deaths each year.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration gave Aastrom’s CRCs the Orphan Drug Designation. That means expedited FDA review, a reduction of filing fees, possible tax credits, and the right to seven years of marketing exclusivity once the product receives FDA approval.

I recommend you buy shares of Aastrom Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:ASTM) under $0.85.

Cerus Corporation (NASDAQ:CERS) has developed an INTERCEPT Blood System to find and inactivate blood-borne pathogens in donated blood components to be used in transfusions.

The INTERCEPT red blood cell system uses the small molecule S-303 to bond with the nucleic acids of pathogens and prevent their replication. A pH change is required to allow the bonding and thereby blocking the DNA and RNA to prevent replication.

This would destroy transfusion-transmitted infections from viruses, bacteria, and parasites.

For platelets and plasma, the same result is achieved by using the molecule amotosalen HCI and ultraviolet A light instead of a pH change to block the replication of pathogens.

This technology could truly revolutionize blood component donation.

The system is currently being used on both platelets and plasma collected in Europe and the Middle East.

The company is preparing for European Phase III clinical trials and will be working with the German Red Cross to commercialize their INTERCEPT system for red blood cells. And it’s initiated Phase I clinical trials for the same system in the U.S.

I recommend you buy shares of Cerus Corporation (NASDAQ:CERS) at or under $2.

Geron Corporation (NASDAQ:GERN) has seen a nice jump in stock price of late and it’s no wonder.

DNA at the end of chromosomes is called the telomere. It has been suggested that the manipulation of the telomere could do everything from stopping the aging process in cells to treating and containing cancer.

It’s telomerase activity that stabilizes cancer cells and allows them replicate indefinitely.

The researchers at Geron believe they can instruct a patient’s immune system via autologous dendritic cells how to identify and attack cancer cells while sparing other, non-threatening cells. (Dendritic cells are the antigen-presenting leukocytes that initiate the primary immune response.)

They achieve this by introducing telomerase characteristics specific to cancer cells. An immune response then occurs when cells are found with those telomerase characteristics.

Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) entered an agreement with Geron for the exclusive research, development and commercialization of the company’s vaccines targeting telomerase. In December of 2007, Merck initiated a clinical trial of the Geron-created vaccine GRNVAC1.

And that’s not all this company has up its sleeve…

Geron is collaborating with the University of Oxford on a variation to GRNVAC1 called (unoriginally) GRNVAC2.

Here, instead of isolating dendritic cells in each patient, the researchers are attempting to produce them from human embryonic stem cells.

This could act to prevent an immune response against an antigen by instructing the immune system to tolerate it.

On the therapy side of things, Geron’s drug GRN13L seeks to inhibit telomerase activity, thereby destabilizing and causing the death of the cancer cells.

In early December, an interim analysis of GRN163L Phase I clinical trials for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma showed promising results.

This malignancy of plasma cells typically arises in the bone marrow and goes on to impact tissues and organs.

For two patients in the study, the bulk tumor fraction of bone marrow decreased by 78% and 48% respectively.

In addition, activity from the telomerase in the myeloma stem cell-containing fraction of the patients’ bone marrow dropped by 33% and 63%, respectively.

Geron is also working on treatments for heart disease, spinal cord injury, osteoarthristis and more. Check out their website for more details.

I recommend you buy shares of Geron Corporation (NASDAQ:GERN) at or under $6.

But there is another biotech stock I believe to have big potential…

Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CYTX) develops, makes and markets regenerative therapy from adipose tissue (fat tissue).

Adipose tissue has been found an extremely good source for adult stem and regenerative cells.

Cytori is working on using this technology in the treatment of conditions such as cardiovascular disease and gastrointestinal disorders, and in reconstructive surgery and radiation-induced tissue injuries.

Its Celution 800 System product for reconstructive surgery has hit record sales in Europe.

The Celution 900 System cryopreserves a patient’s own stem and regenerative cells is being marketed worldwide.

These systems process the patient’s cells at their bedside, as they are needed.

The company’s StemSource cell banking is very popular in Japan. And interest is picking up everywhere.

Banking one’s cells for future needs could soon become common practice.

To read a more thorough breakdown of what the company has in the works, go to its website.

I recommend you buy shares of Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CYTX) at or under $5.

Source: Four biotechs set to soar