The trip was sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute (API), which paid for the airfare and accommodations. Managers at both Syncrude and ConocoPhillips granted me access to any parts of their operations I wanted to see (within allowances for safety). And everyone answered any and all questions I asked.

Post-trip, I have complete editorial freedom to write about what I saw and learned. And I learned a lot. So this is Part I of a two-part series. Watch for Part II.

The Past and Future of Oil and Oil Sands

The first thing that struck me about visiting the oil sands of Alberta was how much geological and social similarity there is to the oil patch of Pennsylvania.

Geologic similarity? Yes, because the reason that the hydrocarbons are so near the surface in both areas — Pennsylvania and Alberta — is that the Pleistocene glaciers scraped off much of the overlying rock. When the glaciers retreated about 10,000 years ago, they left hydrocarbon-bearing rock formations exposed near the surface, or buried not too deep. This led to oil seeps, which led to people being curious about the black, gooey stuff.

To be sure, the hydrocarbon resource is quite different between the two places. That is, in Pennsylvania, you have light, sweet crude oil that flows easily and is soft and smooth to the touch. Indeed, Pennsylvania crude feels like hand lotion. (It’s the origin of Vaseline, for example. And some people use it as the basis for a shampoo.)

While in Alberta, the “bitumen” from the oil sands is as thick as cold molasses, and very sticky. It’s got some sulfur in it as well.

On a warm day in August, oil sands have the consistency of really stiff, dry oatmeal. Bitumen is a far cry from hand lotion.

And as for social similarities? Well, the Indians of old used to skim the oil from streams near Titusville, Pa. So did people of the “First Nations” of Alberta, who used to recover the tarry bitumen from the rocks along the Athabaska River of northern Alberta. Thus both oil and oil sands have been around for a long, long time.

Early white explorers in both Pennsylvania and Alberta noted the oil seeps. They wrote in journals and logs that eventually somebody could do something with the substance.

Eventually, both Pennsylvania and Alberta had their oil booms. In fact, we’re soon coming up on the 150th anniversary of Col. Drake’s oil discovery at Titusville, Pa, on Aug. 27, 1859. Pennsylvania’s oil boom is colorful history at this point (although Marcellus Shale development will soon change that).

Whereas Alberta is still in the midst of its oil sands boom. It’s a boom that’s going to last for quite some time, I believe.

“Easy” Oil Versus Heavy Oil and Bitumen

There’s a reason Col. Drake started an oil boom in Pennsylvania more than a century before Alberta enjoyed the same thing. Col. Drake found some of that so-called “easy” oil. No, it’s not easy to find. It’s that Col. Drake’s oil flows easily from a well.

That is, for all the oil that mankind has pumped out of the ground in the past 15 decades, almost all of it has been the light, sweet stuff that flows easily. Generally, when people looked for oil they bypassed the heavy oil and bitumen. Until lately, of course.

When we think about the concept of “Peak Oil” today, we need to keep in mind what we’re talking about. The curves show oil output peaking in so many parts of the world. This phenomenon is quite real, as long as you understand that it’s the “old fashioned” kind of oil deposit that Col. Drake was drilling. The light, sweet, easy-flowing oil is getting harder and harder to find, certainly in significant quantity.

But there are a lot of other hydrocarbon molecules out there. Most of those molecules are not light, sweet crude oil. Indeed, most of the hydrocarbon molecules that the world will use in the future will be “heavy,” with lots of carbon atoms and not so many hydrogen atoms.

Here’s a graph from oil services giant Schlumberger that estimates the world’s heavy oil and bitumen resources. Canada’s 400 billion cubic meters of bitumen translates into something like 1.4 trillion barrels of oil equivalent. How much is that? Well, it’s about SEVEN times the total oil reserves of Saudi Arabia.

It just so happens that most of that Canadian bitumen is located in Alberta (with some is in Saskatchewan). And Fort McMurray, about 250 miles north of Edmonton, is the heart of the development process.

Oil Sands — Surface Mining

Large-scale oil sands development began in the 1970s. It took gigantic levels of capital investment, like tens of billions of dollars. That’s not pocket change. So a group of lease-owners got together and pooled their capital to form privately held Syncrude Canada, a joint venture. First mining started in 1978.

The way Syncrude operates, it’s not really “mining.” It’s landscape architecture. Under Alberta law, Syncrude could not turn over its first shovel of rock without a master plan for remediation and restoration at the end of the cycle. It’s quite a farsighted model for long-range resource development.

Thus for much of the 1970s, Syncrude performed baseline environmental studies and data gathering. It started digging in 1978. At first, the pit looked like a moonscape of open-pit mining. See the photo below. It looks like a mess, right? Well, there’s more to the story.

The mining process is fairly straightforward. Big shovels (really big) scoop large volumes (really large) of oil-laden sand (API number 8, the “bitumen”) into gigantic loaders (and I mean gigantic.

The loaders haul the rock to a crusher. The crushed rock goes to a washing bin, kind of like your washing machine at home except it’s the size of a high-rise office building. The Syncrude operation washes the bitumen off the sand using naphtha. Then it separates the bitumen, recovers the naphtha for reuse and takes the clean sand (and it’s clean) and replaces it in a previously mined pit.

The process uses a lot of water, but not as much as the horror stories you might hear about “draining the rivers” of northern Canada. Each barrel of water is recycled about 18 times.

The process uses a large amount of natural gas, but not as much as you may have heard (like “all the natural gas of northern Canada”). Pretty much everything about the operation is built with cogeneration in mind, so the company continuously recovers the heat at each stage. That natural gas goes a long way, from what I saw.

If it takes, say, five years to dig a pit, and then it may take five or more years to fill it back up with sand during the restoration process. Syncrude’s goal is to handle the rock as little as possible.

Eventually, Syncrude returns the land to original grade, although the company has some artistic license with the contours. It covers the land with the original topsoil, which has been in cold storage (northern Alberta… it’s cold up here for 10 months of the year). Then it replants trees, and that’s saying something, because the growing season is under two months. It takes 80 years for your basic spruce tree to reach maturity.

There’s even a new water table, despite the disturbance of the land.

Where Things Now Stand

So at this stage, after 30 years or so of mining (with about 80 years to go, at current rates of extraction), Syncrude has come to a point of delivering 350,000 barrels of synthetic crude oil per day. It takes the 8-API bitumen and upgrades it to oil that’s competitive with West Texas Light. Then it delivers it to the JV members, for whatever use the owners want to make of it.

Along the way, the Syncrude process removes the sulfur, so it’s sulfur free (refiners like that). In fact, there’s a mass of sulfur up at Syncrude that’s about the size of the step pyramid at Saqqara, Egypt. And along the way, Syncrude sells the sulfur to the chemical industry.

The former Syncrude mine that I visited is about 3.5 miles square, and formerly about 200 feet deep. Now it’s restored to grade, with trees growing and a herd of 300 wood bison grazing.

For the cynics out there, I’d say that it’s not some environmental Potemkin village, because you can’t fake a replanted forest of 25-year-old trees. You can’t fake a 300-bison herd. Not on a former mine site 3.5 miles square.

Sure, there are still issues about land disturbance, settling ponds, water usage, gas usage and myriad of other things that come up when you’re spending billions of dollars on a major mining effort. But Syncrude has built its business model around dealing with the “other” issues, and not just moving oil sands and recovering oil products. Don’t underestimate the ability of the Alberta government to regulate its energy producers. This is a long way from Appalachia.

Meanwhile, we’re talking about literally billions of barrels of bitumen (or oil equivalent) that the process makes available to the North American marketplace. And if the U.S. wants to get onto its environmental high horse about the source of the hydrocarbons from the oil sands — and tax or ban their importation — there are other buyers in the world. Like the Chinese, who have racked up many frequent flyer miles on their treks to Fort McMurray.

That’s all for now. In Part II, I’ll discuss the in situ process that I saw at the ConocoPhillips Surmont site.

Until we meet again,
Byron King

Source: Update on Canada Oil Sands, Part I

So states a recent article in the Hundustan Times, another “go to” source for news about what is REALLY happening in the energy industry.

The Kremlin has invested heavily in Russia’s image as an energy superpower. During the recent Russian Victory Day celebrations on May 9, many commentators referred to Russia’s energy sector as one of the key elements of Russian power. Energy took a top billing, right along with Russia’s traditional military might and still-potent nuclear capabilities.

Russian leaders have pledged to continue increasing the country’s output to meet rising demand, especially in Asia. The first foreign trip by incoming Russian president Dimitri Medvedev was to China, where he made numerous announcements about energy cooperation between Russia and the Middle Kingdom.

But many experts have long pointed out that Russia’s petroleum industry is working under serious constraints:

Most Russian oil fields were discovered in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. During those energy-rich times, the then-Soviet developers skipped over all but the largest deposits. Later on, the smaller fields were developed, but these fields cannot make up for the fading giants of the past. New discoveries of any size are quite rare, even in the vastness of Russia.

Much of the equipment and technology in the Russian oil patch is outdated. In recent years, Russia has imported large amounts of Western equipment. Russia has also brought in Western personnel to help maintain oil output. Western oil service firms like Schlumberger and Baker Hughes have a large presence in Russia.

The private parties who acquired many energy Russian assets after the collapse of the Soviet Union made little in the way of long term investment. All along, there was serious doubt about the sanctity or security of the property rights these tycoons acquired in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet state. Hence there was a “boom” mentality that led to rapid exploitation of the easiest resources, with little thought for the long term.

The Russian government imposes confiscatory levels of taxation on the oil industry, with some marginal rates approaching 90%. Thus the high world prices for oil benefit the Russian treasury, but leave little in the hands of oil developers for new investment.

Despite all of this, Russian oil output has been growing at impressive rates for the past ten years or so — in the nature of 5% to 10% per year in some years. But in 2008 that growth has stopped abruptly. Output figures have actually reversed. In absolute erms, Russian oil output is down in the first four months of 2008. Russia may have reached its own “Peak Oil” point, much as the US did in 1970. This has grave implications for the growth of the Russian energy sector, and the larger Russian economy.

If Russian oil output has peaked, we can expect new kinds of both rhetoric and behavior from Russia in its domestic policies, as well as in its dealings with other nations. In all cases, you can expect to see Russia pursue its own security and national interests with a strong hand, if not with a vengeance.

Until we meet again,

Byron King

Note: Byron King is a frequent contributor to the free e-letter Whiskey & Gunpowder. To receive daily insights into energy, oil, commodities and other natural resources sign up here!

Source: Russian Oil, Under Serious Constraints

I’ve been covering the Pilbara and its huge iron ore deposits since moving to Australia three years ago. I consider the place ground zero in the resource bull market. Like most bull markets today, the Pilbara’s boom is related to Australia’s neighbor to the north, China. China is consuming iron ore, coal, natural gas, copper, zinc, and crude oil at a pace we’ve never seen before in human history.

Most of us know China’s boom is a huge driver in the bull market in infrastructure, energy, metals, and minerals. But there’s another developing region you’ve probably never considered… one that could make you a rich investor over the coming years: the Middle East.

The Economist reports the six nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Omar, Qatar, and the UAE) earned $381 billion from oil exports in 2007. The cumulative earnings will reach into the trillions if oil remains over $100 for several years. The region literally has more money than it knows what to do with. A lot of that money is flowing into infrastructure.

———- Advertisement ———-
Your 50% Discount Expires in 4 Days

Until Tuesday, June 10, we’re offering 50% off the price of the best-performing research advisory we publish.

Click here for more information.
————————————

From Dubai to Kuwait, there’s an estimated $2.4 trillion in construction projects either underway or in development in the world’s biggest oil patch.

Surprisingly, $1.4 trillion of that total is for projects in civil construction. This means spending on residential and commercial construction projects in the Middle East outweighs construction on oil, gas, power, petrochemical, industrial, and water projects combined.

The three largest civilian projects are:

1. King Abdullah Economic City, Saudi Arabia: $120 billion. The leading firm is Dubai-based developer Emaar.

2. Silk City Project, Kuwait: $86 billion. The leading firm is Tamdeen Real Estate.

3. Dubailand, UAE: $60 billion. The leading firm is Tatweer.

The Saudi Arabian government wants to diversify the Saudi economy from its current “Three Pillars” strategy of oil, petrochemicals, and industrials. This building strategy is just one of the forces driving up steel prices, which are now over $1,000 a ton.

The Saudis know their 262 billion barrels of oil reserves won’t last forever. They are attempting to plant the seeds for self-sufficient regional growth that’s not related directly to the oil economy. This means building six brand new cities as centers of commerce and enterprise.

That’s right… They’re building giant new cities out of nothing. Four have already been launched. They are:

1. King Abdullah Economic City
2. Jizan Economic City
3. Knowledge Economic City
4. Prince AbdulAziz Bin Mousaed Economic City

Whether the Saudis can build economic prosperity from nothing is an open question. They certainly have the capital to try. High oil prices have guaranteed that.

From an investment perspective, the long-term success of the Saudi’s grand economic strategy doesn’t matter. The money is going to be spent. Any sensible investor, seeing such gaudy capital expenditure figures, would do the only sensible thing: follow the money.

It is not just Saudi money either. And it is not just residential and commercial growth. A lot of it is industrial, petrochemical, and power related.

For example, in the United Arab Emirates, Dubai recently announced plans to build the world’s largest aluminum smelter ever. It’s a $5 billion project with the aim of producing a smelter that can generate 700,000 tons per year. Saudi Arabia has plans for its own $3.8 billion aluminum smelter. Oman has plans for a $2.2 billion smelter.

That’s $11 billion for just three projects.

How can you profit from all this? As I’ve written in my previous columns, the global building boom is going to require awesome amounts of iron ore and base metals… so producers of this “stuff” still have years of gains ahead of them.

You can also buy engineering and construction firms. Someone has to receive the contracts to build all of this stuff. Go through the holdings of the PowerShares Building & Construction ETF for some ideas.

Whichever investments you choose… realize the infrastructure boom isn’t just focused on China. The U.S. is spending to upgrade its “F” infrastructure rating. Russia is spending. Latin America is spending. And now, the Middle East is spending its oil money. It all points to big returns in infrastructure stocks.

Good investing,

Dan Denning

Source: How Arabs Will Drive the Next Great Infrastructure Boom

Why has the price of oil risen so much in the past few months? Is it a supply and demand issue as some believe; or is it because of an out-of-control futures market driven by the proliferation of commodity index funds and rampant speculation, as everyone tries to get in on the rise in commodity prices? This is a very complex issue, with a lot of emotion attached to it.

This week I try to give you an understanding of why oil prices have risen and whether they are likely to stay at such lofty heights or maybe even fall! And we look at a very odd statistic: where are all the tankers? There are some very unusual things happening in the oil patch. If you are currently exposed to the energy or commodity markets, or are thinking about it, I believe you will find this letter of interest. At the end of the letter, I also tell you how you can personally see that help gets to the victims of Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar. It is a desperately needy situation. There is a lot to cover, so we will get to the essay right after this quick note.

I have talked for the past few months about why I feel we may be in for a tough investment environment and a Muddle Through Economy. I think in this type of market cycle it is important to increase your portfolio allocation weighting to noncorrelating investment strategies. I work with Steve Blumenthal and his team at CMG to help investors find managers who can take smaller minimums and who have such alternative strategies. We are creating a platform of managers that you can access for your personal portfolio. I recently completed a special write-up on Eric Leake of Anchor Capital, an investment advisor I am particularly impressed with. For the last 12-1/2 months, he is up 16.77%, in comparison to the S&P 500 index that is down -2.08% (net of fees from April 30, 2007 through May 15, 2008). Equally impressive is that he has generated this return while being uncorrelated to the S&P, and with lower volatility than the market.

You can get this report and others I have written by going to https://cmgfunds.net/public/mauldin_questionnaire.asp and filling out the form. If you are a manager and would like to be considered for the platform, drop a note to PJ Grzywacz at pjg@cmgfunds.net. And if you are an investment advisor and would like to see the managers that are on our platform and determine whether they might fit into your client portfolios, we do have a program to work directly with you.

And as always, if you have a net worth of over $2 million, I strongly suggest you go to www.accreditedinvestor.ws and register there. My partners in the US (Altegris Investments), London (Absolute Return Partners) and South Africa (Plexus) are experts in alternative investment strategies, including hedge funds and commodity funds. We have a very strong selection of funds in a wide variety of styles to help you diversify your portfolio. (In this regard, I am president and a registered representative of Millennium Wave Securities, LLC, member FINRA.) And now, let’s jump into the oil patch.

Those Nasty Index Speculators

Are institutional investors in the form of large commodity index funds the reason behind the current rise not just in oil prices but in the prices of seemingly all commodities? Michael Masters, a long-short hedge fund manager, in testimony before the Congressional Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, said:

“You have asked the question ‘Are Institutional Investors contributing to food and energy price inflation?’ And my unequivocal answer is ‘YES.’ In this testimony I will explain that Institutional Investors are one of, if not the primary, factors affecting commodities prices today. Clearly, there are many factors that contribute to price determination in the commodities markets; I am here to expose a fast-growing yet virtually unnoticed factor, and one that presents a problem that can be expediently corrected through legislative policy action.”

You can read the entire testimony at http://www.mcadforums.com/forums/files/michael_masters_written_testimony.pdf, but let’s hear the basics of his argument:

“What we are experiencing is a demand shock coming from a new category of participant in the commodities futures markets: Institutional Investors. Specifically, these are Corporate and Government Pension Funds, Sovereign Wealth Funds, University Endowments and other Institutional Investors. Collectively, these investors now account on average for a larger share of outstanding commodities futures contracts than any other market participant.

“These parties, who I call Index Speculators, allocate a portion of their portfolios to “investments” in the commodities futures market, and behave very differently from the traditional speculators that have always existed in this marketplace. I refer to them as “Index” Speculators because of their investing strategy: they distribute their allocation of dollars across the 25 key commodities futures according to the popular indices – the Standard & Poors – Goldman Sachs Commodity Index and the Dow Jones – AIG Commodity Index.”

These index funds are composed of a number of commodities. While oil is the biggest component of the various funds, they also have exposure to grains, base metals, precious metals, and livestock. When you buy one of these funds you are buying a basket of commodities.

Why would an investor want exposure to a long-only index of commodities? Perhaps for portfolio diversification, as commodities are uncorrelated with the rest of the portfolio, or as a way to play the growing demand for commodities of all sorts from emerging markets, as a hedge against inflation, and so on. Mainline investment consultants began to suggest a few years ago to their clients that they get into the commodity market on a buy and hold basis, just like they do with stocks and bonds.

And they have done so in a very large way. As the chart below shows, at the end of 2003 there was $13 billion in commodity index funds. By March of this year, that amount had grown 20 times, to $260 billion. Masters also shows that this corresponds with the stratospheric rise in commodity prices. In many commodity futures markets, index speculators are now the single largest participant.

But if you must know, global demand is outpacing supply – though not by much. Only a couple of million barrels a day prevents supply from keeping up with demand, but that’s enough to push the price of crude to record prices.

Ah, life must be good in the oil patch. Companies are making record or near-record profits. Don’t look now but the good times may be coming to an end for the miners of black gold.

We’ve already addressed in an earlier article the number one problem of oil companies: raising production. It’s a losing battle. The best fields are past their prime. Once they’re gone, they’re replaced with smaller fields with harder-to-get oil.

It’s like the Boomer generation looking for the fountain of youth. Boomers can slow down the decline here and there. But the fall from grace is inevitable. Oil producers face the same predicament. They can only see maximum rates of oil production in the rear view mirror.

So, what does the other side of oil production look like? It could be worse. So far, falling production plus soaring prices have brought oil companies huge profits.

The oil companies know they’re thriving on borrowed time. And they’re trying to do something about it. Ideally, they’d like to raise production. But at the very least they’d like to find a way to slow the fall of crude output.

To do so, they’re going after oil that a decade ago was beyond their reach. It lies thousands of feet underneath the oceans of the world.

This is new territory for the oil companies. It’s much too early for the oil companies to have a firm idea of what their costs will be. And while they’re pretty sure they have the technology to get to this oil, they’re still not sure how these technologies will work together.

Here’s a snippet of an earnings call by an offshore drilling contractor I caught last week on this very subject.

Analyst
“… the issue associated with the debate out there of drill ships versus semis, is the 8500 series equipment capable of something like offshore Brazil, would there be modifications required? Is there deck load issues? Just expand on the pros and cons and how much more opportunity when people debate this drill ship versus semi?”

Jeff Saile - SVP Operations
“Why don’t you ask a hard question, Pierre. Certainly we can work offshore Brazil. I don’t know if — I think there’s, a lot of that’s to be understood in the future. I certainly think the 8500 can get in there and compete. I don’t think it’s going to compete with a drill ship. It’s going to come in behind these ships when they do some of this. Some of these ships are going to do advanced exploration … the 8500 is certainly equipped to drill. It can drill in 10,000 feet of water. We’re going to have to do minor modifications to it. We’re reviewing that now. It can certainly drill in deeper water. And we can get out there with the equipment on them and drill these ultra deep wells, as well.”

The semi’s they refer to are semisubmersible rigs. They’re floating offshore drilling units with pontoons and columns. They can be anchored to the sea bottom with mooring chains or dynamically positioned by computer-controlled propellers or “thrusters.”

It’s not just the desperate oil majors who are willing to wade into these tricky deep waters. State-controlled oil companies see these basins as their next big money maker.

Deep-sea drilling is the next frontier. And these semis will help make it happen.

They have plenty of drilling to do … in the 30 billion barrel (from early estimates) Tupi basin off of Brazil … to Chevron’s estimated 15 billion barrel discovery in the Gulf of Mexico … to China’s recently discovered offshore field containing perhaps 2.2 billion barrels .. plus others.

These are major reservoirs. If the preliminarily estimated numbers hold up, Brazil’s Tupi would be the third largest underwater oil find ever.

But there’s a fly in the ointment in all of this … costs.

As I said, it’s too early to get a firm handle on costs. But I’ll tell you this much right now. It won’t be cheap.

And it’s getting more expensive all the time.

Petrobras (from Brazil) is hogging the word’s deepwater rigs and singlehandedly causing a shortage of these sought-after rigs. There are only 21 of them in the world. Petrobras is negotiating to lease 17 on top of what it already has to help explore its Tupi basin and nearby fields.

As a result, these rigs are going way up in price. BP leased one for $480,000 per day at the beginning of the year. Now, they’re going for as much as $600,000.

Shallow offshore drilling is also becoming much more expensive. For example, the company in the excerpt above said its jackup rates (jackup rigs operate in waters of 400 feet or less) in Asia went up 5 percent in the first quarter this year (compared to the fourth quarter of 2007).