<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; Oil Profits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/oil-profits/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bernanke’s Forecast, Buffett’s Green Shoots, Can’t Miss Data, Taking Oil Profits and More!</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/bernanke%e2%80%99s-forecast-buffett%e2%80%99s-green-shoots-can%e2%80%99t-miss-data-taking-oil-profits-and-more/18407</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/bernanke%e2%80%99s-forecast-buffett%e2%80%99s-green-shoots-can%e2%80%99t-miss-data-taking-oil-profits-and-more/18407#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Cadden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Addison Wiggin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durable Goods Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Existing Home Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fomc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green shoots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Mathias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobless Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Fed sees the bright side… Bernanke says worst it over, inflation not a worry&#8230; Warren Buffett can’t see any green shoots… even after eye surgery&#8230; Alan Knuckman on how to survive a sideways stock market&#8230; Byron King says now’s a good time to book profits on this sector&#8230; Housing still out of whack… one chart foreshadows the market’s next move&#8230;</p>
<p> <strong>Take two days off and look what happens… the recession has bottomed.</strong></p>
<p>At least that’s what “they” would have you believe. While we locked ourselves in our bimonthly editorial meeting the last two days, we missed some new “the worst is over” calls. Here’s the rundown:<br />
 <strong> “The pace of economic contraction is slowing,” </strong>declared the Federal Open Market Committee yesterday after emerging from a two-day meeting of&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fed sees the bright side… Bernanke says worst it over, inflation not a worry&#8230; Warren Buffett can’t see any green shoots… even after eye surgery&#8230; Alan Knuckman on how to survive a sideways stock market&#8230; Byron King says now’s a good time to book profits on this sector&#8230; Housing still out of whack… one chart foreshadows the market’s next move&#8230;<span id="more-18407"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z00_00.gif" alt="" /> <strong>Take two days off and look what happens… the recession has bottomed.</strong></p>
<p>At least that’s what “they” would have you believe. While we locked ourselves in our bimonthly editorial meeting the last two days, we missed some new “the worst is over” calls. Here’s the rundown:<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z00_11.gif" alt="" /> <strong> “The pace of economic contraction is slowing,” </strong>declared the Federal Open Market Committee yesterday after emerging from a two-day meeting of their own. Even though Mr. Bernanke and his brood say, “economic activity is likely to remain weak for a time,” the vibe from the FOMC statement was decidedly rosy.</p>
<p>Of course, inflation “will remained subdued for some time” and the group will leave rates near zero “for an extended period.” Same old story at the Federal Reserve. The rest of the Fed announcements were nonevents… new age lending programs and quantitative easing will neither increase nor decrease before their next meeting in August.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z00_31.gif" alt="" /> Despite all the data out this week &#8212; new and existing home sales, GDP, jobless claims &#8212; only one has given the Street a jolt: durable goods.</p>
<p><strong>Orders for items meant to last a few years increased 1.8% from April to May, </strong>smashing Wall Street’s expected 0.4% growth. Never mind that orders in the first five months of 2009 are down 27% compared to 2008… May’s number is another green shoot! Hooray!</p>
<p><img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/AGreenShoot.gif" alt="" width="470" height="358" /></p>
<p>“I get figures on 70-odd businesses, a lot of them daily,” said Warren Buffett yesterday. “Everything that I see about the economy is that we&#8217;ve had no bounce. The financial system was really where the crisis was last September and October, and that&#8217;s been surmounted and that&#8217;s enormously important. But in terms of the economy coming back, it takes awhile. There were a lot of excesses to be wrung out and that process is still under way and it looks to me like it will be under way for quite a while. In the [Berkshire Hathaway] annual report, I said the economy would be in a shambles this year and probably well beyond. I&#8217;m afraid that&#8217;s true…</p>
<p>“I had a cataract operation on my left eye about a month ago and I thought maybe now I&#8217;ll be able to see green shoots. We&#8217;re not seeing them. Whether it&#8217;s retailing, manufacturing, wherever. We have a big utility operation. Industrial demand is down like we&#8217;ve never seen it for a simple thing like electricity. So it hasn&#8217;t happened yet. It will happen. I want to emphasize that. But it hasn&#8217;t happened yet.”<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z01_06.gif" alt="" /> <strong>Speaking of Buffett, his annual charity lunch auction is proving to be an annual sign of the times. </strong>Last year, the oversized $2.1 million winning bid for a lunch with Buffett came from a Chinese fund manager &#8212; three times the previous year’s winning bid. This year, with only one day remaining, bids for the eBay auction are up to “just” $350,000.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z01_13.gif" alt="" /> <strong>The U.S. economy didn’t contract quite as much as reported in the first quarter,</strong> the Commerce Department announced today, adding to the optimistic mood. The government arm finalized first-quarter GDP numbers today. Their initial report detected a 6.1% contraction. The first revision was a 5.7% fall, and now Commerce claims the economy shrank just 5.5% in the first quarter of the year.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z01_25.gif" alt="" /> <strong>The OECD has drastically revised its growth expectations for the U.S.</strong></p>
<p>“Signs have multiplied that U.S. activity could bottom out in the course of the second half of this year,” said Jorgen Elmeskov, the OECD’s acting chief economist. The group now forecasts a 2.8% U.S. economic contraction in 2009 and 0.9% growth in 2010 &#8212; a huge revision from their most recent call of a 4% decline this year and zero growth in 2010.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z01_35.gif" alt="" /> <strong>As far as the stock market goes, we timed our two-day break well… </strong>since Monday’s swift sell-off, major indexes have gone nowhere. Despite all the data and the latest FOMC meeting, the Dow sank 0.2% Tuesday and 0.3% yesterday… yawn… stretch.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z01_42.gif" alt="" /> “This sideways trade for the last few weeks is typical of summer markets,” writes our commodities trader Alan Knuckman, “even in an anything but a typical year for investors. Everyone is so conditioned for strong moves in either direction it has left many unable to handle an undefined trend.</p>
<p>“The stall has disappointed many market watchers &#8212; with some calling for a new downturn. Over my years I have found it better to follow the trend without trying to catch the turn. Don’t be too proud to miss some of it. Most of the money is made in the middle of a trend, and that’s where we’ll stay here at Resource Trader Alert.</p>
<p>“Volume seems light and something is needed to spark movement after the large bull run. The S&amp;P 500 channel &#8212; with lows last week at the 899 level (as a support level) and highs at 925-plus &#8212; is an area to watch closely for future clues. At the same time, Treasury bond futures weekly highs at 117 and lows at 114 have held traders in check. The breakout for either asset class will light the way down the future path for the markets.</p>
<p>“For now, let’s wait and see what trend develops. Have some wine, and let the market sort things out.”</p>
<p>When the next trend emerges, will you know what to do? Have Alan be your guide, here… at <a href="https://www.web-purchases.com/RTAMillion1Y/ERTAK104/landing.html">Resource Trader Alert</a>.</p>
<p>(For a closer look into the psyche of our resource trader, be sure to check out today’s P.S.)<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z02_28.gif" alt="" /> <strong>Commodities have succumbed to selling pressure.</strong> Since peaking at $987 in late May, gold has been in a state of steady decline. It found a temporary bottom early this week at $919 an ounce and has since inched back up to $935.</p>
<p>Oil fell from a recent high of $72 a barrel to as low as $66 this week. While the front-month contract has recovered to about $68 this morning, we detect a dark cloud forming over the sector.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z02_40.gif" alt="" /> <strong>“Oil had a strong climb,” </strong>reports Byron King, “and pushed up over $70 per barrel just a few weeks ago. Then oil met with market resistance. So the price of oil retreated into the current $60 range. Could oil go lower? Yes, at least in the short term. Oil could drop back into the $50s, despite its traditional strength during the summer driving season. You might see gasoline prices pull back 10-20 cents per gallon, which will make that trip to the gas station a buck or two cheaper.</p>
<p>“A pullback like that in oil prices will take the steam out of recent stock market gains for oil producers and oil services. So if you want to take any oil profits, now is probably a good time.</p>
<p>“No, this is not a sell recommendation for the oil sector, or any company in the energy side of the Outstanding Investments portfolio. What I’m saying is that we might have a pullback in an otherwise long-term, generally rising trend for energy. Thus, if you are of a trading mind, then take your recent energy gains now. Book some profit, and hold onto the cash for later buying opportunities. Otherwise, don’t be shocked if the energy stocks take a summer swoon.</p>
<p>“Longer term? Oil is headed upward in price. That’s just plain baked into the cake. Half of the world’s daily oil use is now going to developing countries. And by definition, developing countries are… developing. They are using more and more oil, or how else do you think they are developing? So even if oil use in the developed world just stays flat, that oil will still find a market.”</p>
<p>Outstanding Investments remains one of the greatest values of our industry. If you’re not a subscriber, get with the program,<a href="https://www.web-purchases.com/OST_Oil_War/EOSTK631/landing.html">here.</a><br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z03_22.gif" alt="" /> <strong>The U.S. housing market is back to underperforming expectations.</strong> We saw the latest existing home sales and new home sales numbers this week &#8212; both failed to meet the Street’s forecast.</p>
<p>The National Association of Realtors reported 2.4% growth in existing home sales Tuesday, to an annual rate of 4.7 million. The stock market &#8212; no longer satisfied with meager housing growth &#8212; wanted a rate of 4.9 million and suffered a small sell-off.</p>
<p>Even though sales managed to increase in back-to-back months for the first time since 2005, existing home prices are still plummeting, distressed sales are still booming and the market is still saturated with a 9.6-month supply of homes… a positive sign that the free market still works, but hardly reason to call a bottom.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z03_45.gif" alt="" /> <strong> And new home sales are still slipping into the abyss.</strong>Sales of new houses fell another 0.6%, to a 342,000 annual rate, the Commerce Department said yesterday. That’s down 32.8% from last year &#8212; we hasten to add, a time when the housing market was already in the dumps. Making matters worse, Wall Street analysts were calling for a 2% rise in new home sales. And like existing home sales, the price of new homes is still falling (down another 3%, to $221,600), and inventory is still at a lofty 10-month supply.</p>
<p>Check out this chart of new versus existing home sales. Both have historically moved in near lock step, with the exception of last two years. If this trend is destined for a “regression to the mean,” we wouldn’t be surprised to see new home sales level out and existing sales take a turn for the worse.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/OutofSync.gif" alt="" width="470" height="399" /><br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z04_20.gif" alt="" /> <strong> The dollar’s still stuck in a range.</strong> The dollar index took a quick trip below the infamous 80 score yesterday after the FOMC’s announcement, but has since climbed back up to 80.6… not far from where it’s been for the last two weeks.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z04_33.jpg" alt="" /><strong>Today’s “take it for what it’s worth” dollar quote,</strong> from IMF chief economist Olivier Blanchard:</p>
<p>“For the U.S., it is absolutely no question that a sustained recovery has to come from a large increase in exports, that may not be very easy to do. This may require fairly substantial adjustments in the dollar.” Hmm…<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z04_43.jpg" alt="" /> <strong>“I’m a raving fan of The 5, but come on,” </strong>writes a reader, referring to <a href="http://www.agorafinancial.com/5min/coming-states-crisis-a-mega-trend-the-financial-free-market-insiders-are-selling-and-more/">Monday’s issue</a>, “couldn&#8217;t you muster a better defense of capitalism to the latest apologist?</p>
<p>“It is not capitalism that allowed derivatives and excessive debt levels. It is the distortion of a fractional reserve fiat currency system that is a statist addition to it that did. In a free market with a gold standard, every security bought must be funded with actual value, rather than leverage levels being allowed to explode. It is the printing press, credit creation and the statist monetary system, and not capitalism, that is the source of this crisis.”</p>
<p><strong>The 5:</strong> Heh, well, there you have it.</p>
<p><strong>P.S. We feel obligated to share this photo with you, if only to legitimize Addison’s recent iPhone purchase. </strong>During our marathon editorial meeting yesterday at <a href="http://www.agora-inc.com/14-west-mount-vernon-place">14 West</a>, the fire alarm sounded. The whole building cleared out to a nearby park. Most were content with a break… we’d been vetting our ideas nonstop for the last few hours, and the alarm was a welcome excuse to relax, grab some coffee, have a smoke, etc.</p>
<p>Not for Alan Knuckman, editor of Resource Trader Alert. We didn’t ask how many trades he managed to fire off during the 10-minute alarm, but it was quite clear that he was in the zone. You can take the man out of Chicago… but don’t expect him to stop trading:</p>
<table border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/alanknuckman.JPG" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="center"><em>Curbside commodity options, fueled by Big Gulp</em></p>
<p><strong>P.P.S. Did you learn from 2008?</strong> If so, you’re actively seeking ways to hedge your portfolio from another market fall. We’ve gathered our favorite strategies for playing the next bear market here, in <a href="https://www.web-purchases.com/StrategicShortReportFearFactor/ESSRK616/landing.html">our latest special report.</a></p>
<p>Source: <strong><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.agorafinancial.com/5min/bernankes-forecast-buffetts-green-shoots-cant-miss-data-taking-oil-profits-and-more/">Bernanke’s Forecast, Buffett’s Green Shoots, Can’t Miss Data, Taking Oil Profits and More!</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/bernanke%e2%80%99s-forecast-buffett%e2%80%99s-green-shoots-can%e2%80%99t-miss-data-taking-oil-profits-and-more/18407/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kiss Your Gas Goodbye</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/kiss-your-gas-goodbye/3032</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/kiss-your-gas-goodbye/3032#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Carpenter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brokerages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gop Senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margin Accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Company Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Futures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiretaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/kiss-your-gas-goodbye/3032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A week that saw the war on taxpayers expand onto to several new fronts also saw US Senate Republicans win a pitched procedural battle to keep gas at the pump grossly inflated.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The US’s minority party routed American taxpayers Tuesday when it mopped the floor with citizen-related issues by blocking a vote that would have:</font></p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Killed corporate oil’s $17 billion tax break.</font></li>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Taxed excessive corporate oil profits, unless big oil poured the excess into exploring alternative energies.</font></li>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Forced oil futures speculators from big investment banks, hedge funds and brokerages to have a lot more than 5% cash in the margin accounts they use to bet on oil. Such a move would have dramatically cooled speculation, which even oil company executives admit makes a barrel&#8230;</font></li></ul></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A week that saw the war on taxpayers expand onto to several new fronts also saw US Senate Republicans win a pitched procedural battle to keep gas at the pump grossly inflated.</font><span id="more-3032"></span></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The US’s minority party routed American taxpayers Tuesday when it mopped the floor with citizen-related issues by blocking a vote that would have:</font></p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Killed corporate oil’s $17 billion tax break.</font></li>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Taxed excessive corporate oil profits, unless big oil poured the excess into exploring alternative energies.</font></li>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Forced oil futures speculators from big investment banks, hedge funds and brokerages to have a lot more than 5% cash in the margin accounts they use to bet on oil. Such a move would have dramatically cooled speculation, which even oil company executives admit makes a barrel of oil (today) $70 to $80 too much. </font></li>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Made it a federal crime to price gouge oil and gas.</font></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">On the first two issues, Republicans ignored the minimum $17 billion in taxes that would once again flow to US coffers. Instead, they accused Democrats of merely wanting to punish oil companies as a way of expressing the seething anger most American taxpayers feel over gas prices that have skyrocketed for no apparent reason.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Democrats said, “Yup, making oil companies pay their fair share and punishing them for excessive profits while Americans suffer is exactly what we wanted to do.”</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">“Why that’s un-American,” screamed GOP senators. All while they rushed to call John McCain in order to congratulate him for admitting that, if elected president, he’d continue a program that secretly wiretaps domestic phone calls made by American citizens.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">GOP senators made no comment on the bill’s increased margin account provision. What could they say? Big investment banks, hedge funds and brokerages won. Taxpayers lost a huge one. Best to pretend it never happened.  </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">But, Senator I.M. Forsale did applaud the effort. He said the move is part of an effort to make gas so expensive that “poor people won’t have the gas to drive to the bank to cash welfare checks… perverted homosexxxxxuaaaallls can’t afford to drive to city hall to get married and godless whore women are economically prevented from driving to Planned Parenthood clinics.”</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">He added, “$5 and $6 gas is finally going to shake the  losers, the sinners and the old out of the American family tree.”</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky acknowledged that Americans are hurting from the high-energy costs. But, he strongly opposed the Democrats&#8217; response and ridiculed those who “think we can tax our way out of this problem.”</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">&#8220;Republicans by and large believe that the solution to this problem, in part, is to increase domestic production,&#8221; McConnell said.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A GOP energy plan, rejected by the Senate last month, calls for opening a coastal strip of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Drilling in the ANWR would net the US about 454 days of oil, at its current 22-million-a-day burn rate.  And, it would take eight to ten years bring the first of this oil to market.</font></p>
<hr align="center" width="100%" />
<p align="center"><font color="#ff0000" size="2"><strong><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">INTERNAL   ENDORSEMENT</font></strong></font></p>
<p><font color="#ff0000" size="2"><strong></strong></font></p>
<p align="center"><font color="#ff0000" size="2"><strong></strong></font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong><font size="2">Just this   Once</font><br />
BELIEVE THE   HYPE!</strong></font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong> </strong>It was the email that <em>shocked</em> the investment world. </font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">One noted investment authority   told his readers to take <u>seven</u> huge stock market gains <u>on one day</u>… <strong>SEVEN HUGE WINNERS on one day that ranged   from 526% to 102%&#8230; seven, and on stocks…</strong> not   options.</font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">But that was just the beginning!   It now looks to be setting up to happen again this year,   too.</font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong><u><a href="http://www1.youreletters.com/t/1500744/35011814/1583090/0/" target="_blank">That’s   why you must check out the whole story right   here.</a></u></strong></font></p>
<hr align="center" width="100%" /><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Look, I have always leaned toward drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. But, only as long as ExxonMobil was not allowed to participate. XOM has done its bad deed for the last millennium up there.</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And, I never bought into the fact that 2,000 acres was the maximum land that would be disturbed. It will be more like 1.5 million acres, less than 10% of ANWR, which is something close to 2,300 square miles. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">I actually believe that oil field technology is advanced  enough that it would be fairly safe to drill there.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Of course, there’s the human element to consider… as in shortcuts and corrupt contractors.  And, with so much at stake, some people might try to cover up mistakes.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Then, I did some research and discovered just how little oil is in ANWR… modest predictions are 5.5 trillion barrels… best-case predictions suggest 10 trillion barrels.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And, that is quite literally – even at the 10-trillion level  – a drop in the bucket. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">You see, the US Energy Information Agency reported that if Congress gave the go-ahead to pump oil from ANWR, the crude could begin flowing by 2017. It would reach a peak of 876,000 barrels a day by 2029.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">But even at peak production, the EIA analysis said, the United States would still have to import more than two-thirds of its oil.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">That’s 21 years until peak. And, that peak would be less than one million barrels a day. That’s less than 1/20th of our daily burn.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And, this is a front-burner issue. For whom?</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Now, I rarely share with you the thoughts I send in private  to my <em>Asia Business &amp; Investing</em> subscribers… but a bit of what I wrote to them on Wednesday is an extension of  my thoughts here.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">This is what I wrote</font></p>
<blockquote><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>Here in the United States… apparently no one in charge is to blame for the state of the economy… fuel and food prices… except, of course, consumers who pay the prices.</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>Ron Reagan was known as the Teflon President because trouble didn’t stick to him. Today, US leaders in Washington eschew the Teflon, because no one is throwing anything at the White House or Congress.</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>It’s  you and I that need the Teflon.</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>After  all, it was greedy homeowners who created the credit crisis… not nominally  regulated banks and lenders.</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>It is SUV drivers and soccer moms in mini vans who have run up the price of oil – not totally unregulated oil futures speculators (Google “Enron Loophole” for the whole story) or the threatened veto of a farm bill that included a provision to close the seven-year old crooked loophole, which is well known among Washington highest echelons at both ends of Pennsylvania Ave.</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>…if you’re like me, when you look around don’t you occasionally wonder who led us to the state we are in today… and why everyone in Washington has escaped blame… or worse, won’t accept responsibility?</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>Instead, what we get is the Mitch McConnells of the world saying “we know Americans are hurting but there’s not a thing Congress can do about it – except to open up oil drilling in the Alaskan Nation Wildlife Refuge…”</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>See, there it is again… Washington is not to blame… it’s those pesky, do-gooder, unpatriotic, environmentalists who are pissing in the soup</em>.</font></p></blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">So, how about this for an idea?</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">If this oil is so freekin’ critical to the US’s way of life, then we open up the ANWR for oil exploration, but with two huge restrictions.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">They would be that ExxonMobil is not allowed to participate  in the ANWR.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And, oil company profits would be capped at 6%.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">You see, the US Geological Survey estimates that at $30 a barrel, oil company profits would be about 12% on ANWR oil&#8230; but, the Department of Energy, on Thursday, said that oil prices will be $129 a barrel in 2009. It should be $86 in 2010. And it should be back over a c-note at $107 in 2015.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">So, who knows how high profits would fly on ANWR oil by 2017  when its initial oil came to market.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">But, under my restrictions, every penny beyond a 6% profit would evenly flow directly to the Social Security Trust Fund and Medicare.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And, I am certain that as patriotic Americans with the ability to help sustain the American way of life, US oil companies would rush to accept that deal.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Have a great weekend.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Andy</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">P.S.  To let me know what you thought of today&#8217;s article, send an e-mail to: <a href="mailto:feedback@investorsdailyedge.com" target="_blank"><font color="#0066cc"><u>feedback@investorsdailyedge.com</u></font></a>.</font></p>
<p><a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com/newsletter-archive.aspx">Source: Kiss Your Gas Goodbye</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/kiss-your-gas-goodbye/3032/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the Party, Pal</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/welcome-to-the-party-pal/2415</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/welcome-to-the-party-pal/2415#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justice Litle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bull market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Slowdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation Pressures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stagflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/welcome-to-the-party-pal/2415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You’ve likely heard of being “bushwhacked.” Well, yesterday the  market got Fed-whacked. Notes from the Federal Reserve’s April 29-30 meeting were  released and, boy, did they make for some unpleasant reading.</p>
<p>The major indexes  took their hardest hit in months as Wall Street digested the news.</p>
<p>As it turns out, the shiny happy Fed wasn’t nearly as shiny  and happy behind closed doors as investors might have hoped. Instead, there was  a palpable sense of gloom.</p>
<p>The battle with economic slowdown will be a long, tough  slog, the notes implied… as will be the battle against inflation. The Fed went  so far as to admit conditions could <em>still</em> be bad in 2010.</p>
<p>It’s a bit hard to swallow for those of us who’ve been  paying&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’ve likely heard of being “bushwhacked.” Well, yesterday the  market got Fed-whacked. Notes from the Federal Reserve’s April 29-30 meeting were  released and, boy, did they make for some unpleasant reading.<span id="more-2415"></span></p>
<p>The major indexes  took their hardest hit in months as Wall Street digested the news.</p>
<p>As it turns out, the shiny happy Fed wasn’t nearly as shiny  and happy behind closed doors as investors might have hoped. Instead, there was  a palpable sense of gloom.</p>
<p>The battle with economic slowdown will be a long, tough  slog, the notes implied… as will be the battle against inflation. The Fed went  so far as to admit conditions could <em>still</em> be bad in 2010.</p>
<p>It’s a bit hard to swallow for those of us who’ve been  paying attention but, believe it or not, slowdown worries and inflation woes  are <em>still</em> big news to some folks out  there.</p>
<p>There is a hefty cross-section of investors (and Wall Street  pros, too, for that matter) who are just “waking up” to the reality that we at  <a href="http://www.taipanpublishing.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title="Taipan Publishing"  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Taipan</a> have been shouting about from the rooftops for so long.</p>
<p><em>What? You mean the Fed  is fretting over a toxic cocktail of slowing growth <u>and</u> rising inflation  pressures? Ye gads, why does that sound so familiar? Could it be… could it  possibly be… what was that “S” word again that those doom and gloomers like to  yap about? “Stagflation” or something like that? Stop the presses!</em></p>
<table style="font-size: 90%; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" align="center" border="1" bordercolor="#debe7c" cellpadding="4" width="590">
<tr>
<td>
<table align="center" border="1" bordercolor="#debe7c" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="4" width="590">
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#f2ead7" height="148" width="574"><strong>Do You Qualify for “Free Money” Payouts?</strong>Starting  tomorrow at 9:30 a.m., you can use a government-issued <strong>“Authorization Code”</strong> to add $4,570 per month to your bank account.Read on to find out how to <a href="http://www.isecureonline.com/reports/DEN/WDENJ508/" target="_blank">put your name on the  “free money” payout roster…</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong>A Word From John  McClane</strong></p>
<p>The out-of-the-blue shock on the heels of the Fed minutes  reminds me of a scene from <em>Die Hard</em>,  one of my favorite old-school action movies.</p>
<p>Bruce Willis (in the role of detective John McClane) is trapped  in a skyscraper with a bunch of ruthless German terrorists, and he is desperate  to bring in outside help. He frantically gets hold of 911 on the roof, but the  skeptical operator thinks it’s a prank call. Witticisms are exchanged; hilarity  ensues. Finally the annoyed operator gives in and says she’ll “see if a black  and white can do a drive-by,” just to get Willis out of her hair.</p>
<p>A cop cruiser later rolls up to Nakitomi Plaza, circles the  pavilion aimlessly, and gets ready to leave with a “nothing to report.” But  Willis is having none of that. He responds by heaving a defunct terrorist through  a skyscraper window, right down onto the cruiser… and then fills the car’s hood  with machine-gun fire from 20 stories up.</p>
<p>After seeing his windshield smashed and his car riddled with  bullets, the half-asleep cop behind the wheel goes from bored day-dreaming to  burning rubber in reverse gear, yelling at the top of his lungs for backup.  Willis cackles at his success in getting someone’s attention. <em>“Welcome to the party, pal!”</em></p>
<p>So here’s a shout-out to those who thought the U.S. could  just tip-toe past the consequences of its actions… who assumed that consumers  would soon be right as rain again with no worries over all that debt piling up…  who shrugged off inflation as a “minor problem” and assumed the broken banks could  just be patched up like bike tires… to you we say, “Welcome to the party, pal!”</p>
<p><strong>40 Acres and a Mule</strong></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.isecureonline.com/reports/DEN/WDENJ508/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com/img/assets/3712/20080522_td_chart1.gif" alt="S&amp;P 500 Index" border="0" height="339" width="408" /></a></p>
<p>The party is revving up again now &#8212; for the bears. It  wasn’t just that the market saw its biggest downward jolt in months yesterday. The  S&amp;P 500 also managed to fail right at its 200-day moving average (light  green line)… a slightly ominous sign (and a plenty loud new shorting signal).</p>
<p>Oh, and by the way &#8212; financial stocks, those toxic  turnaround candidates we love to hate, are again leading the market downward.  On May 9, <em>Taipan Daily</em> said of XLF  and the financials in general: “This is a nice short setup. There will be some  bearish trigger-pulling here soon.”</p>
<p>Those shorts are nicely profitable now, and set to get more  so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/welcome-to-the-party-pal/2415/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oil Company Profits: Mere Supply and Demand?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/oil-company-profits-mere-supply-and-demand/2380</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/oil-company-profits-mere-supply-and-demand/2380#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nopec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Company Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peak oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shell Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/oil-company-profits-mere-supply-and-demand/2380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/22/business/22oil.html?_r=1&#38;hp&#38;oref=slogin" title="Open a new broswer window to learn more." target="_blank">Oil company profits</a> came under the spotlight yesterday as Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee strove to &#8216;take on&#8217; the record profits of oil companies. This from <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/22/business/22oil.html?_r=1&#38;hp&#38;oref=slogin" title="Open a new broswer window to learn more." target="_blank">The New York Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Such showdowns between lawmakers and oil titans have become a familiar routine on Capitol Hill. But with gas prices nearing $4 a gallon, and lawmakers headed home for a weeklong Memorial Day recess where they expect to get an earful from angry constituents, there is added urgency for Congress to appear active.</p>
<p>But while momentum is building for several measures, including a bill that would allow the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries to be sued in American courts under antitrust laws, there is little sign that any of the proposals would&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/22/business/22oil.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin" title="Open a new broswer window to learn more." target="_blank">Oil company profits</a> came under the spotlight yesterday as Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee strove to &#8216;take on&#8217; the record profits of oil companies. This from <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/22/business/22oil.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin" title="Open a new broswer window to learn more." target="_blank">The New York Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Such showdowns between lawmakers and oil titans have become a familiar routine on Capitol Hill. But with gas prices nearing $4 a gallon, and lawmakers headed home for a weeklong Memorial Day recess where they expect to get an earful from angry constituents, there is added urgency for Congress to appear active.<span id="more-2380"></span></p>
<p>But while momentum is building for several measures, including a bill that would allow the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries to be sued in American courts under antitrust laws, there is little sign that any of the proposals would do much, if anything, to lower prices quickly.</p></blockquote>
<p>The hearing on oil profits came as Capitol Hill struggled to be seen to be &#8216;doing something&#8217; about the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/22/news/economy/gas_prices/?postversion=2008052206" title="Open a new broswer window to learn more." target="_blank">15-day run of record gas prices</a>.</p>
<p>This week, the House voted in the so-called &#8220;Nopec bill&#8221;, which targets the OPEC oil cartel as a monopoly in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Senate Democrats are also targeting windfall profits by oil companies and speculators in the oil futures market that they blame for high oil prices.</p>
<p>The oil company execs hit back at yesterday, however, pointing out that the fundamental laws of economics &#8212; such as supply and demand &#8212; was responsible for high oil profits.</p>
<p>“As repetitive and uninteresting as it may sound, the fundamental laws of supply and demand are at work,” said John Hofmeister, the president of Shell Oil. “Oil exporting nations, as has been said, are managing their natural resource development and production to supply their local and global markets in their own self-interest.”</p>
<p>Commodities investing expert <a href="http://www.caseyresearch.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Doug Casey</a> at <a href="http://www.caseyreasearch.com" title="Open a new broswer window to learn more." target="_blank">CaseyResearch.com</a> points out that in its weekly inventory report, &#8220;the Energy Information Administration said  that <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/where-will-crude%e2%80%99s-run-end/2377" title="Read more.">crude stocks were down 5.4 million barrels</a> for the week ended May 16.  Analysts had been expecting a rise of about 900,000 barrels.&#8221;</p>
<p>Keith Fitz-Gerald of <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a> says the US can&#8217;t refine or drill its way out of the oil crisis, either.</p>
<p>&#8220;For one thing, refiners are the ultimate middlemen and they’re pinched at  these prices. They simply can’t make money as they try to refine an increasingly  expensive product and sell it to users who are chaffing at $4 a gallon. That’s  why stocks like Western Refining Inc. (WNR), Tesoro Corp. (TSO), and Valero  Energy Corp. (VLO), for  example, have fallen by nearly 30-40% in recent months. Their margins get worse  with each up-tick in oil prices from here on out now that we’ve reached a point  where high prices are beginning to dampen demand.&#8221;For another, drilling and refining our way out of this assumes we have oil to  begin with… we don’t. And even if we turn the Alaskan Tundra into Swiss cheese,  the demand reduction we’re seeing here in the United States is being  dramatically offset by developing countries that are guzzling gasoline at  unprecedented rates.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-admin/Nor%20can%20we%20drill%20or%20refine%20our%20way%20out%20of%20this%20mess,%20as%20President%20George%20Bush%20seems%20to%20favor.%20In%20a%20recent%20interview%20with%20Yahoo%21%20News,%20the%20president%20suggested%20both%20as%20alternatives%20when%20in%20reality%20we%20can%20do%20neither.%20%20For%20one%20thing,%20refiners%20are%20the%20ultimate%20middlemen%20and%20they%E2%80%99re%20pinched%20at%20these%20prices.%20They%20simply%20can%E2%80%99t%20make%20money%20as%20they%20try%20to%20refine%20an%20increasingly%20expensive%20product%20and%20sell%20it%20to%20users%20who%20are%20chaffing%20at%20$4%20a%20gallon.%20That%E2%80%99s%20why%20stocks%20like%20Western%20Refining%20Inc.%20%28WNR%29,%20Tesoro%20Corp.%20%28TSO%29,%20and%20Valero%20Energy%20Corp.%20%28VLO%29,%20for%20example,%20have%20fallen%20by%20nearly%2030-40%%20in%20recent%20months.%20Their%20margins%20get%20worse%20with%20each%20up-tick%20in%20oil%20prices%20from%20here%20on%20out%20now%20that%20we%E2%80%99ve%20reached%20a%20point%20where%20high%20prices%20are%20beginning%20to%20dampen%20demand.%20%20For%20another,%20drilling%20and%20refining%20our%20way%20out%20of%20this%20assumes%20we%20have%20oil%20to%20begin%20with%E2%80%A6%20we%20don%E2%80%99t.%20And%20even%20if%20we%20turn%20the%20Alaskan%20Tundra%20into%20Swiss%20cheese,%20the%20demand%20reduction%20we%E2%80%99re%20seeing%20here%20in%20the%20United%20States%20is%20being%20dramatically%20offset%20by%20developing%20countries%20that%20are%20guzzling%20gasoline%20at%20unprecedented%20rates.%20%20In%20fact,%20those%20are%20precisely%20the%20reasons%20that%20I%E2%80%99ve%20been%20predicting%20for%20years%20that%20oil%20prices%20were%20headed" title="Read more.">Read on here</a> to find out why Keith says oil prices will reach $225 a barrel and how a simple three-step plan can bring down oil prices, without the kind of political showboating seen Washington yesterday.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/oilcompro.jpg" title="oilcompro.jpg"><br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/oil-company-profits-mere-supply-and-demand/2380/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anger over Oil Companies&#8217; Record Profits as Gas Prices Surge</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/anger-over-oil-companies-record-profits-as-gas-prices-surge/1647</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/anger-over-oil-companies-record-profits-as-gas-prices-surge/1647#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Mobil Proftis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Pump Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Companies Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Companies Record Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shell Profits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/anger-over-oil-companies-record-profits-as-gas-prices-surge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=4746112&#38;page=1" title="Open a new browser window to learn more." target="_blank">gas prices</a> near $4 a gallon across America, oil companies have announced record profits.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/27/AR2006042700534.html" title="Read the full article." target="_blank">The Washington Post</a>: &#8220;US oil major Exxon Mobil reported $8.4 billion in first-quarter profit yesterday, as members of Congress outraged over high gasoline prices hastened to propose measures that would boost taxes on oil firms, open new areas to drilling and provide rebates to taxpayers but would not necessarily alter prices at the pumps.&#8221;</p>
<p>This puts Exxon Mobil on track to break the whopping $36 billion record profit it made last year.</p>
<p>Oil companies&#8217; profits outside the US are also surging, with Shell and BP postiong <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7372509.stm" title="Open a new browser window to learn more." target="_blank">combined quarterly profits of $14.3 billion</a>.</p>
<p>The record profits come as US crude futures rose to a record $119.93 yesterday.</p>
<p>&#8220;Forget the bleating&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=4746112&amp;page=1" title="Open a new browser window to learn more." target="_blank">gas prices</a> near $4 a gallon across America, oil companies have announced record profits.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/27/AR2006042700534.html" title="Read the full article." target="_blank">The Washington Post</a>: &#8220;US oil major Exxon Mobil reported $8.4 billion in first-quarter profit yesterday, as members of Congress outraged over high gasoline prices hastened to propose measures that would boost taxes on oil firms, open new areas to drilling and provide rebates to taxpayers but would not necessarily alter prices at the pumps.&#8221;<span id="more-1647"></span></p>
<p>This puts Exxon Mobil on track to break the whopping $36 billion record profit it made last year.</p>
<p>Oil companies&#8217; profits outside the US are also surging, with Shell and BP postiong <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7372509.stm" title="Open a new browser window to learn more." target="_blank">combined quarterly profits of $14.3 billion</a>.</p>
<p>The record profits come as US crude futures rose to a record $119.93 yesterday.</p>
<p>&#8220;Forget the bleating about <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/oil-at-a-record-high-of-120-is-great-news-for-our-investments/" title="Read the full article." target="_blank">pain at the pump</a>,&#8221; says Manraaj Singh in London, &#8220;the rising price of black gold should be a shot in the arm.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Here is what is happening,&#8221; says Peak Oil expert Byron King. &#8220;The <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/oil-going-up-where-will-this-elevator-stop/" title="Read the full article.">world oil supply has become very tight.</a> Demand is rising. The price for oil would ordinarily be going up to clear the market. But with all the “extra” money creation coming out of the U.S. Fed, oil prices are going up even faster (this is what the chart above shows). And I should add that just the expectation of loose money is also inflating the price of oil. There is probably $15-20 worth of “speculation premium” built into every barrel.&#8221;</p>
<p>Byron has unearthed a very interesting chart that shows the correlation between the increase in M3 money supply and rising <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/oil-going-up-where-will-this-elevator-stop/" title="Read the full article.">oil prices</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/anger-over-oil-companies-record-profits-as-gas-prices-surge/1647/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.303 seconds -->

