And with good reason. The United States has a bigger and more-troubled financial sector than most countries. It also has a bigger overhang from the housing bubble, has a bigger balance-of-payments deficit and has a budget deficit that’s fat enough to stall the recovery.

It would be nice to have an economic recovery to invest in that didn’t have all of these problems.

Truth be told, such an investment play does exist. What’s more, the market I have in mind is advanced enough for us to invest in it without having to go through all the rigmarole of American Depository Receipt (ADR) investing. Nor will you have to make a potentially risky foray out onto some foreign stock exchange to buy the shares, because they are almost all listed here.

The country I’m talking about is Canada. Think of it as being like home – but without the problems that our home market (the United States) currently suffers from.

Our Healthy Neighbor to the North

When the recession struck, Canada was hit by it quite badly, but for different reasons from its southern neighbor. The Canadian housing market was nowhere near as overheated as its U.S. counterpart. So Canada’s housing downturn wasn’t as deep.

And what about the banking systems? To be sure, Canadian banks received a bailout, but it was less than $20 billion in total. Compare that to the veritable alphabet soup of U.S. bailout programs ranging from “TARP” and “TALF” that have injected more than $2 trillion into the U.S. financial system.

On the other hand, natural resources prices crashed last autumn, which had a major effect on Canada’s resource-based economy. A number of large projects in the Athabasca Tar Sands region were cancelled, for example – since this region has oil reserves around the size of the entire Middle East, its development is crucial to Canada’s future.

The “loonie,” Canada’s currency, declined from around “parity” to the U.S. dollar to an exchange ratio of C$1.30=$1 U.S. In effect, this was a “flight to safety” into the dollar and U.S. Treasuries. And it affected Canada as it did other countries.

In 2009, however, Canada and the United States have traveled down totally different paths. Canada did very little “stimulus,” so its state budget is in much better shape. The deficit for the 2009-2010 fiscal year $53 billion (C$56 billion) is only about 4% of gross domestic product (GDP). For the 2010-2011 fiscal year, the deficit is expected to be about $42 billion (C$45 billion), or 3.2% of GDP.

Energy Powers the Rally

The bounce in natural resources prices has really helped power up the rebound of Canada’s market.

Investment in the tar-sands region has picked up again, with a big merger between the two largest tar-sands-extraction companies: Suncor Energy Inc. (NYSE: SU) and Petro-Canada. The rising gold price hasn’t hurt either – mines are appearing all over the place! All this new activity has made the loonie bounce, so it’s back to about C$1.07=$1. While interest rates are as low as the United States, the Bank of Canada hasn’t done much “quantitative easing,” meaning that inflation isn’t too much of a worry.

The strong loonie helps here, too.

Canada seems to be recovering nicely. Its index of leading indicators jumped 1.1% in August, while manufacturing sales grew 5.5% in July. The country presently runs a modest current account deficit, but it’s only 2% of GDP. That’s much lower than even the current U.S. deficit, let alone that of 2007. It had a little more public debt than the United States in 2008, but given current U.S. deficits, those two lines almost certainly have crossed by now.

There are two caveats. The first is an obvious one: If commodity prices crash to earth, Canada will have some difficulty because commodities are a large part of its economy. Personally, I don’t see that happening. It’s notable that PetroChina Co. Ltd. (NYSE ADR: PTR) has just invested $1.7 billion in a Canadian tar sands project, so China must not think so, either.

The other risk is political. The current minority Conservative government of Stephen Harper has done a good job, but the opposition Liberals have withdrawn their parliamentary support. That means there may be an election this autumn. A Liberal majority government would be no disaster. They might be a bit sticky about oil-drilling permits, but would not otherwise rock the boat.

However, a Liberal coalition with the leftist New Democrats could push public spending and the deficit up, and there’s no guarantee against that. (One of the problems with multi-party systems like Canada’s is there is an almost infinite variety of possible governments after each election, some of which can be fairly alarming from a business perspective.)

However, Canadian elections are a much smaller risk than you get in most countries, and the commodity/oil price crash, if it happened, would help the U.S. economy and, presumably, your U.S. portfolio. So it’s worth having some Canadian exposure, perhaps with the Canadian market exchange traded fund (ETF) iShare MSCI Canada Index (NYSE: EWC).

For years it was almost fashionable to dismiss Canada from an economic standpoint. Now, however, that may well be where the smart money would like to go. As an economy, Canada is competent and stable.

It’s the kind of country that looks to be a good place for some of our money.

• Reliable sources of energy.
• A modern, efficient infrastructure, consisting of a good road and rail system, reliable power grids and high-speed digital communications networks.

And if a country wants to be considered a “global economic powerhouse,” it’s nearly impossible for it to do so without these critical building blocks.

So it’s not too surprising that China is spending unprecedented amounts of money to beef up its infrastructure.

It’s also spending huge amounts of money on long-term oil and gas contracts. And with nearly $2 trillion on hand, it’s the perfect time for China to go on an energy acquisition spree.

Right now, it’s spending like a thirsty sailor on shore leave…

You see, despite the recent pullback in the Chinese stock market, the country is still on an economic roll that will continue for the next 50 years. According to The Economist, China’s capital spending is a whopping 44% of its GDP, and in raw dollars could exceed that of the United States for the first time this year.

And you can bet that its increase in energy use will track right along with its growth.

But China’s energy problems are similar to those of the United States: It doesn’t have enough of its own sources of fossil fuel to meet its needs.

So what is China doing to combat this? And is there a way to tap into this in terms of investing? Answers below…

China’s Energy Asset Acquisition Spree

At the moment, China is importing coal, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and crude oil. And to guarantee that those supplies are uninterrupted, it’s buying some major deposits of oil and gas, along with the refineries to process it.

We’re not just talking small potatoes, either. Since Christmas, China has been on an overseas energy asset acquisition spree. The country has spent a total of $17 billion, easily topping the $13.1 billion it spent in all of 2008. What’s more, the pace of acquisitions doesn’t appear to be slowing – and could even ramp up into 2010.

Many companies are teaming up, putting together joint deals that insure even the largest purchases have funding behind them. And some are very, very big. For example…

• In April, PetroChina (NYSE: PTR) partnered with KazMunaiGaz and plunked down a cool $5 billion to purchase JSC MangistauMunaiGas from Central Asia Petroleum. This was one of the first instances of Chinese firms partnering together to purchase a foreign oil company.
• June saw a highly publicized $20 billion deal, in which China National Petroleum Corporation joined forces with BP (NYSE: BP) to buy a 75% stake in the Rumaila oil field in southern Iraq. The consortium’s bid topped that of the Exxon/Mobil (NYSE: XOM)/Shell (NYSE: RDS) partnership.
• Just one month later, the China National Offshore Oil Company (NYSE: CEO) – often referred to as CNOOC – hooked up with Sinopec. The two of them coughed up $1.3 billion to acquire a 20% stake in a deepwater block off Angola from Marathon Oil.

China’s Knee-Deep In Canadian Oil Sands

Now, the Chinese have landed in Canada. And it’s not because they like hockey. They’ve quietly bought up several parts of different oil sands operations.

Just a few days ago, PetroChina announced a $1.7 billion deal, in which it will acquire a 60% stake in Athabasca Oil Sands Corp’s MacKay River and Dover oil sands fields.

This isn’t the first time that China has invested in Canadian oil sands. Back in 2005, CNOOC purchased a 16.7% stake in MEG Energy Corporation, while China Petrochemical Corporation plunked down $83 million for a stake in Syneco Energy, Inc.

So why is China interested in something like oil sands – oil that is very difficult and expensive to bring to fruition? Simple. All the easy, lucrative projects have already gone. It’s a disturbing indication of China’s quiet determination to increase its oil and gas reserves… at any price.

So what’s next?

How To Invest In China’s Energy Acquisition Express

As evidenced by the variety of different operations that China has acquired recently, the country is taking a shotgun approach to energy.

And while it’s not easy to see what it’s focused on next, the best way to play this trend is by owning shares of the buyer. This includes big Chinese oil companies like…

• PetroChina
• Sinopec (NYSE:SHI)
• CNOOC

All these firms have American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), which means you can trade them on the U.S. exchanges.

One note of caution before you do, however: If you read my colleague Louis Basenese’s piece on the China sell off earlier this week, he highlighted 10 reasons why the Chinese market is set to fall from here.

I agree with Lou – and I believe waiting until we see evidence that the Chinese markets have bottomed will represent an excellent time to take a position in some of these companies.

Good investing,

David Fessler

Source: China’s Energy Acquisition: Three Ways to Invest in China

Investment News Briefs Tuesday, September 1, 2009

The first was an unprecedented $41 billion liquefied natural gas (LNG) deal with Australia, which was announced last week. The deal calls for PetroChina Co. Ltd. (NYSE: PTR) – Asia’s largest oil and gas company – to buy 2.25 million tons per year of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the Gorgon field in Western Australia over a period of 20 years.

It is the largest deal ever brokered between the two nations.

The Gorgon field has yet to be developed but is considered to be a key global resource and an economic boon for Australia.

“The Gorgon Project is globally and nationally significant with a resource base of more than 40 trillion cubic feet of gas and an estimated economic life of at least 40 years from the time of start-up,” said Chevron Australia Managing Director, Roy Krzywosinski.

“Furthermore, the Gorgon Project is Australia’s largest single resource project and is set to deliver significant economic benefits and create around 10,000 indirect and direct jobs during peak construction.”

Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) owns and operates 50% of the field.

Yet this is just one of the mega-deals signed between China and Australia. China was Australia’s second largest merchandise trade partner in 2008 with two-way trade of $56.3 billion (A$67.74 billion). Australian exports to China grew 37% in 2008 from the previous year to $27 billion (A$32.48 billion) and comprised chiefly of raw and lightly processed farm, mineral and energy products.

“China needs us, we need China,” said Australian Trade Minister Simon Crean.

Of course, China’s demand for natural gas and other resources is growing so fast that it needs more than Australia.  That’s why the Red Dragon recently signed a $5.6 billion deal with a consortium of energy companies operating off the coast of Myanmar.

The consortium, led by South Korea’s Daewoo International Corp., will supply China National United Oil Corp. (CNUOC) with 500 million cubic feet of natural gas a year from 2013 to 2043. The supply, which will come from Myanmar’s A-1 and A-3 offshore blocks, amounts to about 7% of China’s current gas consumption, Reuters reported.

The consortium – which also includes India’s Oil and Natural Gas Corp., Myanmar Oil & Gas Enterprise, India’s GAIL Ltd., and Korea Gas Corp. – will invest a total of $5.6 billion in the project and be responsible for production and offshore pipeline transportation.

Land transportation will be jointly managed with CNUOC. The two parties also plan to build oil and gas pipelines through Myanmar and into China’s southwestern Yunnan province, Reuters reported.

Few Western countries, or Western companies do business with Myanmar, which has been heavily criticized for its human rights violations. The military junta that controls the country is considered one of the most repressive and brutal regimes in the world today. Forced labor, child labor, human trafficking, and instances of sexual abuse are widespread.

However, China, which has itself been a target among human rights watchdogs, chooses to overlook these discretions, preferring instead to focus on Myanmar’s resources. And in its defense, China is rightly concerned about securing enough raw materials to support its booming economy and a population of about 1.3 billion people.

Natural gas, for instance, accounts for just 3% of China’s total energy needs, but its use is expected to grow rapidly as energy demand increases. China currently consumes about 7.3 billion cubic feet per day, but that is expected to grow at a 10% compound annual rate to 18 billion cubic feet per day by 2020, according to Bernstein Research.

And China is doing the right thing by securing long-term supplies of natural gas now, while prices are low and supplies are high. It’s taken similar action with other commodities over the past year, stocking up on large amounts oil, copper, and iron ore as prices swooned.

China Gases Up While Prices Are Low

Natural gas prices yesterday (Thursday) fell to levels not seen since 2002 after the U.S. Energy Department said the amount of gas in storage hit a record high for this time of year.

Natural gas stockpiles rose by 52 billion cubic feet to about 3.2 trillion cubic feet in the week ended Aug. 21 –21% above year ago levels. Levels are now so high that some experts believe the United States will run out of storage capacity before winter begins.

“We have never been here before in terms of what to expect when storage gets this high,” Aubrey K. McClendon, Chief Executive Officer of Chesapeake Energy Corp. (NYSE: CHK), told the New York Times. “It’s like a balloon; there comes a point where you can’t blow any more air into it.”

Natural gas prices tumbled more than 6% to $2.725 per 1,000 cubic feet of gas on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), a price not seen since Aug. 7 2002, The Associated Press reported.

However, now that gas prices have tumbled roughly 80% from last year’s high above $13, some investors believe the market is bottoming out – or at the very least, significantly below its fair value.

Chesapeake Energy stock has risen nearly 8% in the past month, despite plunging prices and mounting inventories. Devon Energy Corp. (NYSE: DVN) is up about a 5.5%.

“The perception is that gas has finally gotten to its lowest point, so people are buying exploration and production stocks,” Marshall Adkins, energy analyst at Raymond James Financial Inc. (NYSE: RJF), told Reuters.

However, Adkins does not expect a rebound to come any time soon. His firm expects natural gas prices to fall below $2.50 per thousand cubic feet in the months ahead as an inventory overhang overshadows gas’ attractive price.

Still, there’s good reason to believe gas prices will have a strong rally in early 2010. To begin with, gas companies are slashing production exploration in dramatic fashion.

Newfield Exploration Company, for instance, has announced the plans to voluntarily curtail about 2.5 billion of cubic feet equivalent of gas of its third quarter of 2009 production in response to the recent lull in prices.

U.S. producers have cut the number of rigs drilling for new gas by more than half since Sept. 2008. Oil-services company Baker Hughes Inc. (NYSE: BHI) recently reported that 688 gas rigs were active in the United States, down about 56% from one year ago.

“We think the decline curve for production will be fairly steep because of the big drop in drilling,” Rich Howard, manager of the Prospector Capital Appreciation fund, told CNNMoney.

Source: China Landing Natural Gas Deals as Prices Plummet

Crude was up for a sixth straight session, and now sits at its highest level in seven months. Yesterday’s rally came on top of a 30% rise during May, the biggest monthly gain in a decade, as the weaker U.S. dollar and hopes for an economic recovery have bred a gang of optimists.

Many analysts, however, have become increasingly concerned that oil’s recent upswing is overdone.

“What all these surging markets have in common is that their advances are occurring in spite of uninspiring fundamentals,” wrote Edward Meir, of MF Global.

“It seems that for the moment participants are not interested in the bearish dynamics of the market, and instead are pushing values higher on solid technicals and bullish exogenous variables, such as the weaker dollar, firmer equity markets, and improving macro data,” Meir added.

And a PetroChina (NYSE:PTR) official said gasoline and diesel prices in that country are going up by the equivalent of 19 cents a gallon, effective yesterday. The move represents increases of about 6% to 7% over current average gasoline and diesel retail-ceiling benchmarks.

Source: Crude Pushes Higher

MidAmerican is 87.4% owned by Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.A, BRK.B), which just last week paid $5 billion for a stake in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS). Buffett’s vote of confidence for Goldman was enough to lure skeptical investors back into the treacherous financial services sector and boosted Goldman Sachs’ shares by nearly 10% over the two days following the announcement.

Similarly, shares of BYD (Build Your Dreams) shot up 42% in Hong Kong Monday following MidAmerican’s decision. BYD’s stock had tumbled 56% since hitting its 52-week high last October.

The purchase also marks Buffett’s first large investment in China following the sale of Berkshire’s stake in PetroChina Co. Ltd. (ADR: PTR) last year. After cautioning investors against the Chinese stock market at a time when it was just beginning to peak, Berkshire sold 28 million shares of PetroChina, netting a profit of about $3.5 billion from what had been a $500 million investment in 2003. PetroChina has lost roughly half its market value since Buffet divested Berkshire’s stake.

Buffett now appears ready to test the fast-growing Chinese market again, and a stake in BYD opens up brand new opportunities for MidAmerican, a diversified energy-products company, and for BYD, a builder of electric cars that has some ambitious objectives.

The global auto industry is just one worldwide business sector pushing to capitalize on China’s tremendous long-term promise. China’s auto market is expected to advance at an 18% clip this year. The U.S. auto market is in the midst of an 11-month slump, its longest since a 14-month slump that took place in 1991. New car sales are expected to fall 17% this year, Bloomberg News reported.

The Shenzhen-based BYD is actually a battery manufacturer that plans to advance its business by selling plug-in electric cars in China by the end of this year. It intends to import those cars into the U.S. market by 2010.

BYD’s lithium-iron phosphate batteries give the company’s F6DM, or Dual Mode, mid-sized sedan the ability to travel 62 miles in all-electric mode before traveling an additional 205 miles on gas power. BYD’s F3DM, a smaller and less expensive model, reportedly has a 100-mile range in electric-only mode. By comparison, the recently unveiled General Motors Corp. (GM) Chevrolet Volt can go only about 40 miles before it needs the gasoline engine.

MidAmerican Chairman David Sokol told The New York Times that his company was impressed by BYD’s ability to produce electric cars that have a range of almost 190 miles on a single charge, and can be 80% recharged in just 15 minutes.

Sokol also pointed out that plug-in electric cars may be more adaptable to the United States market than cars that run on hydrogen or ethanol because there is already existing infrastructure to supply electricity for recharging almost anywhere, whereas hydrogen or ethanol stations and supply routes would have to be established across the country.

“We can drop these charging stations anywhere,” Sokol told BusinessWeek. “If you want a rapid charging one in your garage it will cost between $2,500 and $3,000 to install.”

The annual energy cost to run a BYD-made electric car, based on 12,000 miles of driving per year, would be about $400, Sokol said. That compares to $2,400 for a traditional gas-powered car with fuel priced at $4 per gallon. Also, the energy consumed by an electric car in the U.S., assuming the national average of 51% of power supplied by coal, would produce half as much carbon dioxide as a gas-powered automobile.

BYD sold 85,104 cars in the first eight months of the year, a 35% increase from 2007. The company, which is widely known as a leading producer of cell-phone batteries, estimates that auto sales will make up 30% of its 2008 revenue, up slightly from 25% in 2007. And with Buffett’s help, BYD may see even faster growth, as the Berkshire name brings newfound credibility to a relatively unknown carmaker.

“Warren Buffett is very well respected globally as well as in China, so as an investor he will help us build our brand,” BYD Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Wang Chuanfu told BusinessWeek.

Wang also said that Buffett’s involvement could accelerate the BYD’s transition to the U.S. market, and noted that MidAmerican Energy could be a big part of his company’s future plans.

“Developing our electric vehicles requires a lot of energy, which MidAmerican Energy can supply us in the future,” Wang said.

Michael Dunne, managing director of J.D. Power China, recently called the tie-up the “most exciting news in China’s auto history.”

Berkshire is a “formidable investor, which brings confidence to the picture,” Dunne said. “BYD can say ‘Yeah we can do this.’”

Source: Berkshire Stake Brings Confidence and Credibility to Top China Electric Carmaker BYD

• In yet another indication of the weak economy, U.S. bankruptcy filings spiked in the second quarter, up 29% for the 12-month period ended June 30. Business filings ratcheted up more than 41% to 33,822 from 23,889 the year before. Non-business filings totaled 934,009, up 28% from the same period in the prior year, CNNMoney.com reported.

• Tokyo-based real estate developer Sohken Homes Co. Ltd. filed for bankruptcy, sparking concern over a weakening Japanese economy. “If consumers were confident their salaries would remain secure, they’d buy condos and homes even with 30-year loans,” Yoshihiro Ito, senior strategist at Okasan Asset Management Co. in Tokyo, told Bloomberg News. “With rising prices and stagnant income growth, that isn’t the case now.”

• Aerospace firm The Boeing Co. (BA) withdrew plans to begin phasing out its traditional employer-sponsored pension plan after threats of a strike from the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. Boeing had hoped to replace the costly plan with a 401(k)-type plan that was more dependent on employee contributions, MarketWatch reported.

• Shares of sports apparel maker Quicksilver Inc. (ZQK) jumped over 15% yesterday (Wednesday) after a $147.7 million (100 million euro) bid for its winter sports apparel and equipment unit from Chartreuse & Mont Blanc, which is majority owned by Australia’s Macquarie Group Ltd. The California-based retailer put the unit up for sale after a lackluster ski season and weak domestic economy dragged on sales, Reuters reported. The sale will allow Quicksilver to refocus on its marquee brand product lines.

• Light, sweet crude for October delivery rose $1.88 to settle at $118.15 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange yesterday (Wednesday), after earlier spiking as high as $119.63. Crude has jumped more than $3 this week as Hurricane Gustav continues to slowly spiral towards the Gulf Coast.

• TiVo Inc. (TIVO) posted a quarterly profit for only the third time in its 11-year history yesterday (Wednesday), reporting $2.9 million in net income, or 3 cents per share, compared with a loss of $17.7 million, or 18 cents a share, over the same period last year. The company said it expects TiVo also said it expects a net loss in the range of $7 million to $9 million for the current quarter, MarketWatch reported.

• PetroChina Co. Ltd. (ADR: PTR) posted a 38% drop in quarterly earnings after refining losses and windfall taxes dissolved gains from soaring crude prices. The company will likely continue to find itself encumbered by state-capped fuel prices, even after Beijing raised gasoline and diesel prices by 18% in June, Reuters reported.

• BP PLC (BP) is conducting secret, high-level negotiations with the billionaires who co-own its troubled Russian venture TNK-BP and an outline deal to settle their dispute may come in weeks, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters. Lamar McKay, a top BP official brought in to end the saga at TNK-BP, held a five-hour meeting in London the week before last with Mikhail Fridman – the billionaire oligarch who calls the shots on the Russian side of the company, Reuters reported.

Source: Global Investing Roundups Thursday, August 28th, 2008

• The World Trade Organization (WTO) has published a new draft of plans for a global trade deal that will be discussed the next time world trade ministers meet, BBC News reported. Although the plan doesn’t change existing tariff or subsidy cuts, it does offer some compromises and clarifies some key “sticking points.” Negotiators hope to have a deal closed by the end of the year.

• Battered by increasing steel costs and dampened consumer demand due to high gas prices, Ford Motor Co. (F) announced yesterday (Thursday) that it would not be able to meet Chief Executive Officer Alan Mulally’s goal of returning to profitability by 2009, Bloomberg News reported. North American vehicle production will be cut throughout the rest of this year due to “the rapidly changing business environment in the [United States],” a company statement read.

• First-time jobless claims fell 9,000 to 365,000, from a revised 374,000 the previous week, the Labor Department announced yesterday (Thursday), Bloomberg News reported. The decline was unexpected and indicates that companies are responding to the current U.S. economic slowdown by curtailing hiring, while trying to maintain current employees.

• Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index hit a one-month closing low yesterday (Thursday) in reaction to the declines in the U.S. markets. Oil firms Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co. (ADR: SHI) and PetroChina Co. Ltd. (ADR: PTR) also weighed on the index. “Weak U.S. stocks and Beijing’s denial on an imminent deregulation of oil product prices hurt market sentiment,” Kenny Tang, associate director at Tung Tai Securities, told Reuters.

• Bookseller Barnes & Noble Inc. (BKS) yesterday (Thursday) reported a loss of $2.2 million, or 4 cents per share, for its fiscal first quarter ended May 3, compared with a loss of $1.67 million, or 3 cents per share, for the same period in the prior year, Reuters reported. Barnes & Noble reduced its full-year outlook based on the difficult economic environment and announced it would consider “the feasibility of a transaction” with rival Borders Group Inc. (BGP).

• The American Petroleum Institute, the trade group for major oil and natural gas companies, spent nearly $1.3 million in the first quarter to lobby on fuel economy standards, appropriations bills, and other issues, the Associated Pressreported. The API also lobbied on various pieces of legislation dealing with oil taxes and fees, renewable fuel standards, climate change, offshore drilling and more, according to the form posted online April 21 by the House clerk’s office.

• Bill Miller, portfolio manager at Legg Mason Capital Management, has not signed on to the Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO) investor coup being led by Carl Icahn. However, in an interview at a New York conference Wednesday, Miller, whose fund controls a 5.4% stake in Yahoo, said he wants Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) to reopen talks to buy Yahoo outright and not simply forge a joint venture. “It is a strategic imperative for Microsoft to change its position,” Miller told Reuters after speaking at the hedge fund conference.

• The International Energy Agency announced yesterday (Thursday) that it is studying depletion rates at about 400 oil fields in its first-ever study of world oil supply. The Paris-based group said the study, to be released in November, was prompted by concern about the volatility of world oil markets and uncertainty about supply levels.

• The spinal-products unit of medical-device maker Medtronic Inc. (MDT) will pay $75 million to settle accusations that it defrauded Medicare by telling doctors to bill in-hospital stay – even when a cheaper outpatient visit would have done the job, The New York Times and The Associated Press both reported. Originally, the accusations had been leveled against Kyphon Inc., which Medtronic spent $4.2 billion to buy in November.

Source: Global Investing Roundups: Friday, May 23rd, 2008

The case for the target-price increase of 20% was very clear.

“The math is really simple here,” Fitz-Gerald said in an e-mail interview from China, where he was heading an investment-research tour. “We are burning through supplies at a rate that’s four times to five times faster than we’re discovering new reserves. Throw in a few [surprises] … perhaps a terrorist event …and add in the accelerating use of oil and gasoline in Third World countries, and we have the recipe for far higher prices. That’s already in the oven.”

Crude-oil futures jumped up over the $123 a barrel level yesterday (Wednesday) – closing at an all time record – as worries about worldwide oil supplies continued to sweep away any good news in the energy sector. In fact, prices have soared more than $11 a barrel – or 9.8 % – over the past four days alone, reaching back to last Thursday, MarketWatch.com reported.

But it wasn’t the price increases that prompted Fitz-Gerald to boost his oil-price target. In fact, he did that last week. In addition to the proprietary strategy he uses to project market prices, Fitz-Gerald said he relied on some of the observations he’s been making as part of the investor trip he’s leading through China.

In that country, all it takes is a stroll down the street to see that the demand for oil and gasoline is going to increase far faster than most analysts would ever believe.

“Nowhere is that more evident than China where I’m traveling now,” Fitz-Gerald said last week in an e-mail from Mainland China’s capital. “Beijing alone is adding 14,000 cars a day. Across China, the number is obviously higher. [The] same [is true] in India, but I don’t have the figures at my fingertips. Then there’s the other side … evidence suggests that OPEC reserve figures may be artificially high. Imagine what’s going to happen when people figure out that there really isn’t as much oil as everybody thinks. $225.21 is not out of the question … after we get to $187.”

Alternative energy is the only answer, Fitz-Gerald says. But some of that is years from being commercially viable – cheap and reliable enough to be affordable to, and used by, mainstream consumers.

“Barring the introduction of a truly [alternative] and inexpensive technology, this is going to get ugly … and very pricy before it gets better,” Fitz-Gerald wrote. Investors need to be “long energy, long commodities” for right now, and for the foreseeable future.

China is doing all it can to overcome the massive energy deficits that it faces. One such project is the massive Three Gorges Dam, which Fitz-Gerald had visited the day of his interview with Money Morning.

“It’s surreal how big this project really is,” he noted.

Fitz-Gerald sees oil-and-gasoline prices going higher – much higher. And four factors will be the key catalysts. They are:

• Obfuscation by OPEC: Members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries have been misrepresenting their reserve capabilities for years. The key players have reported no new discoveries for decades.

• Terrorism Threats: The odds that a terrorist act will interrupt oil supplies – in the near term or the long term – are higher than most security experts would ever publicly confirm, Fitz-Gerald says. And this is especially problematic because of the double-whammy effect: Damage to a major pipeline or a strategic refinery could crimp supplies just as demand is continuing to escalate.

• The Dollar Doldrums: Oil is priced in dollars. And the dollar is in the dumper. Indeed, rising inflation and falling interest rates have put the greenback into a steep downward spiral. And if prices keep rising, and if Federal Reserve policymakers keep cutting short-term interest rates, the dollar will continue to lose altitude against other key global currencies. OPEC members will counter the greenback decline by marking up the price of crude, causing prices to increase still more in dollar-denominated terms.

• Cruising Goes Global: As an increasing number of households in China, India and other advancing overseas economies join the world’s middle class, they’ll start making such basic purchases as electronic goods, houses – and automobiles. The fact that China’s oil imports jumped 18% in one month is evidence enough that this is happening. And the fact that leading India automaker Tata Motors Ltd. (TTM) has unveiled a $2,500 car, the Nano, underscores that international carmakers are looking to recruit a whole new group of motorists. The fallout: For U.S. refiners, oil will first get lots more expensive, and then supplies will start to dry up as countries opt to halt exports and keep the precious black gold for themselves.

Oil Becomes a Strategic Asset

Oil prices have made a major move in the past five years – just as the emergence of China, Russia and several other key economies transformed crude-oil pricing into much more of a global game. High prices have sent cash pouring into the coffers of oil-producers in Asia and the Middle East. Many countries have used that capital to finance global investment initiatives, creating government-controlled “sovereign wealth funds” to do their bidding.

Little wonder crude oil has become a strategic asset – as well as an energy source.

“As oil and other fuels become a more and more precious resource, OPEC countries, China, Russia and others will begin holding back oil, instead of putting it into the market,” Fitz-Gerald says. “That’s going to be devastating in the short-run.”

Some big oil consumers such as the United States have lobbied OPEC to boost production in order to bring market prices down. But it’s done no good: Members of OPEC have said over and over that market supplies are adequate and that the surging prices are not something that they can control.

China – a growing consumer of oil – has embraced a different strategy: To create captive supplies of crude, China has demonstrated that it’s more than willing to endure controversy and cut deals with countries U.S. refiners either can’t or won’t deal with. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. (SNP), and PetroChina Company Ltd. (PTR) – two of China’s biggest oil companies – have invested in such political hot spots as Africa and Iran.

The Chinese government, desperate to lock down supplies of such crucial natural resources as metal ores and crude oil, has sealed deals with Sudan, Chad and the Congo. African Business reports that trade between Africa and China has advanced at a rate of 40% a year since 2001. In 2006, bilateral trade between the two was $50 billion.

Already, 14% of China’s oil imports come from Angola. About 60% of Sudan’s oil goes to China.

To understand why you should heed Fitz-Gerald’s observations, it’s important to understand just how far ahead of the pack he’s been – and how far ahead he remains – when it comes to predicting long-term energy trends and investment opportunities.

“This place is one big construction site,” Fitz-Gerald said. “You cannot turn around without finding scaffolding, piles of materials, construction equipment and the like [no matter where you look] here.”

With the U.S. economy suffering its worst downturn in years, and China’s stocks down more than 40% in the past six months, the bustle of construction-related activity in this Asian giant seems incongruous – if not downright contradictory.

Surprisingly, it’s neither. This divergence between China’s ailing stock market and its still-spunky economy is an early manifestation of “economic decoupling” – an emerging trend being fueled by the globalization of worldwide markets.

In fact, China’s ability to maintain its frenetic growth rate of nearly 11% per annum while the U.S. market could well be mired in a recession is yet another example of economic decoupling, says Fitz-Gerald, the investment director for Money Morning who is currently leading a group of investors on a tour of Mainland China.

“Economic decoupling will continue and is accelerating with each passing day,” Fitz-Gerald said in an e-mail interview from China.

But the main point to remember is that economic strength is a function of consumer power – which China has plenty of, with more still to come – whereas stock markets are a function of expectations.

And the amount of new investors in and outside of China blew expectations too high for companies to deliver, especially in the face of a U.S. slowdown.

“Economic strength and stock markets do not have to move simultaneously. In fact, history suggests they don’t. Cycles nearly always reflect underlying economic movement prior to financial markets separating,” Fitz-Gerald said.

A Tough Deal

Not everyone agrees with Fitz-Gerald’s assessment. The broadest of the three key U.S. stock indices – the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index – is down 8.38% in the past six months, although it was down nearly double that before a recent rebound. And the U.S. economy is near – if not actually in – a recession.

Until recently, the U.S. economy was such a key element of the global market that a downturn here made it a near-virtual-certainty that overseas economies would sour and spiral downward – hence the Wall Street adage: “When the U.S. economy sneezes, the rest of the world catches a cold.”

Perhaps no longer. Rich in both commodities and cash, China’s economy continues to advance. But here’s the part that makes decoupling tough to understand: Although the Chinese economy is still growing at a double-digit rate, its benchmark Shanghai Composite Index is down a painful 40.3% in the past six months.

And some of the country’s all-star companies have really taken it on the chin. The past six months, for instance:

• Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. (ACH) is down 40.65%.
• iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index ETF (FXI) is down 22.34%.
• PetroChina Co. Ltd. (PTR) is down 40.44%.
• And China Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (LFC) is down 33.75%.

Skeptics of decoupling will argue that China’s index is tanking in lockstep with the U.S. economy. However, Fitz-Gerald, who lives in and around Asia, sees a different story both in the numbers and on the ground.

So what gives?

“Most of [the critics of decoupling] are Anglos sitting in the heart of New York City, never having visited and seen this first hand,” Fitz-Gerald said. “Economic progress here is unstoppable and market slide is temporary.” 

The real answer is that different forces are influencing Chinese stocks and the Chinese economy, meaning the two aren’t always as interlocked as people would like to think.

For a long time, most China stocks were off-limits to foreigners, and even domestic investors faced restrictions on where they could put their cash. As an increasing number of China-based companies went public and made their shares available to both domestic and foreign investors, cash poured into those firms, running their shares up much higher than the company’s underlying value really warranted.

“There is so much capital chasing them that it’s natural they’re going to move,” Fitz-Gerald said.

Granted, some investors who knew when to cash in and pull out made quick fortunes.

But many first-time investors (or first-time China investors) bought Chinese stocks blindly, lost a ton of money, and are now scratching their heads wondering why investment analysts keep talking about China’s vast investment potential.

The major culprits that dragged down China’s indices are stock market linkages between the United States and foreign markets – meaning that currency devaluations and slowing foreign economies (such as China’s major trading partner, the United States) pinched the profits of some Chinese companies – but nowhere near enough to cause a downturn there.

Plus, unlike past emerging-market downturns, there hasn’t been massive “capital flight,” with foreigners taking their money and heading for the safety of their banks at home. China has too much long-term profit potential for foreign investors to give up now.

Besides, even if they did, China has record foreign reserves of $1.68 trillion – more than enough to weather a rainy day in the economy there.

On top of sightseeing, shopping, food, and hospitality well beyond the standard tourist fare, Fitz-Gerald is leading a tour of one or more of China’s stock exchanges. [Fitz-Gerald is also the editor of the New China Trader, an investment newsletter dedicated solely to finding value and profits in China’s red-hot economy].

And although it’s difficult for investors to navigate through the volatile markets, the long-term payoff is worth the pain.

The bottom line is that China is on track for 10% to 12% growth this year – and that’s after China’s government has taken steps to slow the country’s economy down.

“Investors who abandon China now will live to regret their decision,” he said. “Even if the U.S. economy skids into a recession, China will continue to grow for decades to come. And that’s after nearly 30 years of double-digit growth that country has already logged into the history books.