<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; Puru Saxena</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/puru-saxena/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Debt &#8211; the fall of the U.S. economic empire</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/debt-the-fall-of-the-u-s-economic-empire/21074</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/debt-the-fall-of-the-u-s-economic-empire/21074#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Puru Saxena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compelling Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Reckoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[day of reckoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puru Saxena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectacular Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terminal Decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trillion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=21074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 19th century belonged to Britain, the 20th century belonged to America and in the 21st century, China will rule the business world. Whether you like it or not, this transition is already underway and it will intensify over the coming decades.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links">Daily Reckoning</a>&#8217;s Puru Saxena examines the ends of U.S. debt and the shifting economic balance of world power to China.</strong><br />
Puru Saxena <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com">The Daily Reckoning</a></p>
<p>The 19th century belonged to Britain, the 20th century belonged to America and in the 21st century, China will rule the business world. Whether you like it or not, this transition is already underway and it will intensify over the coming decades.</p>
<p>Throughout history, no empire has managed to rule forever. Instead, empires rise to power, they prosper and spread their influence. Thereafter, they over-extend themselves and then break down in some fashion. In fact, all the glorious empires of history had one thing in common – a spectacular collapse.</p>
<p>Now, there can be no doubt that America ruled the economic world for the better part of the previous century. However, this powerful nation has now entered a terminal decline. The recent credit crisis and the failure of some of the largest American financial corporations is compelling evidence that the world’s largest economy is well past its prime.</p>
<p>Today, America finds itself heavily in debt and to make matters worse, its demographics are also worsening. Unfortunately, the American leaders are attempting to postpone the day of reckoning by taking on even more debt! It is noteworthy that over the past year alone, America’s federal debt increased by approximately US$2.1 trillion and its projected budget deficit over the next decade is now slated to be almost US$9 trillion! If this does not shock you, then consider the chart below which shows the total obligations of the US government.</p>
<p>Click <a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/debts-they-grow-up-so-fast">here</a> to read the rest of Puru Saxena&#8217;s article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/debt-the-fall-of-the-u-s-economic-empire/21074/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inflation is Our Future</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/inflation-is-our-future/20803</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/inflation-is-our-future/20803#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Puru Saxena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gold Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bull market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invest in gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puru Saxena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US dollar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On one hand, the deflationists are claiming that given the extremely high debt levels in the West, further inflation is impossible. On the other side of the argument, many proponents of inflation are calling for Zimbabwe style hyperinflation. In this business, everyone is entitled to their opinion; however it is my contention that we will get neither deflation nor hyperinflation. <strong>If my assessment is correct, once business activity picks up, our world will have to deal with high inflation.</strong></p>
<p>Although I have great sympathy for the deflation crowd, given the reckless attitude of the central bankers and their ability to create debt-based money, I do not believe deflation (contraction in the supply of money and total debt) is very likely.</p>
<p>For sure,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On one hand, the deflationists are claiming that given the extremely high debt levels in the West, further inflation is impossible. On the other side of the argument, many proponents of inflation are calling for Zimbabwe style hyperinflation. In this business, everyone is entitled to their opinion; however it is my contention that we will get neither deflation nor hyperinflation. <strong>If my assessment is correct, once business activity picks up, our world will have to deal with high inflation.</strong></p>
<p>Although I have great sympathy for the deflation crowd, given the reckless attitude of the central bankers and their ability to create debt-based money, I do not believe deflation (contraction in the supply of money and total debt) is very likely.</p>
<p>For sure, in this post-bubble environment, <strong>American consumer debt continues to contract, but this is being more than offset by the expansion in federal debt.</strong> Over the past year alone, federal debt in America has surged from US$9.645 trillion to US$11.813 trillion. In other words, during the past twelve months, American federal debt has risen by a shocking 24.47% and it now stands at 83.52% of GDP! Now, given the ability of the American establishment to essentially create dollars out of thin air, I have no doubt in my mind that it be able to inflate the economy. However, this will come at a huge cost and the victim will be the American currency.</p>
<p>In fact, the recent weakness in the US dollar is a sign that central-bank sponsored inflation has started to dominate the private-sector debt contraction in the West. Furthermore, over the past few weeks, various governments have issued US dollar-denominated debt and this suggests that the carry-trade is back in vogue. In a startling move, Germany recently announced that it plans to borrow money in US dollars!</p>
<p>Now, given the ongoing federal debt inflation, debasement of paper currencies, sky-high budget deficits and competitive currency devaluations, the macro-economic environment has never been better for precious metals. <strong>Yet, both gold and silver continue to frustrate the bulls by staying below the record-highs recorded in spring 2008.</strong></p>
<p>So, what is going on here? Have we already seen the end of the precious metals bull-market or are we about to witness an explosive rally? Before I attempt to answer this question, I want to make it clear that even though gold failed to better its all-time high during last autumn’s panic, it was the only asset, (apart from US Treasuries) which stayed relatively firm. And looking at the various markets today, gold is the only asset that is flirting with its all-time high. So, whether you like it or not, gold deserves some credit for fulfilling its role as a safe haven.</p>
<p>Now, unlike some of the die-hard gold bugs, I don’t believe that gold is the ultimate asset to own at all times. Without a doubt, there have been times in history when gold has proven to be a lousy investment. For instance, between 1980 and 2001, the nominal price of the yellow metal fell by an astonishing 70%. This horrible price action spawned an entire generation who grew up hating gold and up until a few years ago, the vast majority considered gold a barbaric relic.</p>
<p>However, during other periods in history, when macro-economic uncertainty was high and inflationary expectations were running out of control, <strong>gold turned out to be a fantastic asset to own.</strong></p>
<p>If my take on the macro-economic situation is valid, then we are in such a period now and gold must form a part of every investment portfolio.</p>
<p>You may remember that over the past year, central banks have injected trillions of dollars into the banking system and it is only a matter of time before inflationary expectations start spiraling out of control. Up until now, this ‘stimulus’ money hasn’t permeated through the economy in the West but once money velocity picks up, prices will start rising and the investment community will become very concerned about inflation. <strong>When the deflation scare abates and people start protecting the purchasing power of their savings, capital will start to flow towards precious metals.</strong></p>
<p>Long-term clients and subscribers will recall that about two years ago, I highlighted gold’s tendency to rocket higher every other year. Figure 1 captures this trend perfectly and you can see that since the outset, gold’s bull-market has been punctuated by lengthy consolidations and the yellow metal has surged to a new high every alternate year.</p>
<p><strong>Figure 1: Is gold about to shine?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img title="Gold Price" src="http://dailyreckoning.com/files/2009/09/DRUS09-29-09-3.JPG" alt="Gold Price" width="433" height="196" /></p>
<p><strong>So, if gold remains in a bull-market and its trend consistency is intact, its price should surge over the following months.</strong> Conversely, if the price of gold fails to climb above its all-time high before year-end, it should start to ring alarm bells as this would open up the possibility that the bull-market may be over. Remember, certainty does not exist in the investment world and savvy investors should remain open to all outcomes.</p>
<p>Now, given the uncertainty in the world today and the ticking inflationary time-bomb, my view is that gold will soon embark on its north-bound journey. So, I suggest that investors hold on to gold and the related mining companies which will probably continue to perform well until next spring.</p>
<p><strong>As far as silver is concerned, it has always been a high-beta play on the direction of gold.</strong> If the next up leg in gold’s bull-market materialises, the price of silver will also head towards the heavens. Accordingly, investors may also want to allocate a portion of their investment portfolio to silver bullion and silver producing companies.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Puru Saxena</p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/inflation-is-our-future/">Source:Inflation is Our Future</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/inflation-is-our-future/20803/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peak Oil: Supply Data Doesn’t Lie</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/peak-oil-supply-data-doesn%e2%80%99t-lie/20167</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/peak-oil-supply-data-doesn%e2%80%99t-lie/20167#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Puru Saxena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oil Investment & Alternative Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peak oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puru Saxena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite the ‘demand destruction’ hype, it is interesting to note that during this severe global recession, worldwide oil usage has dropped by a minuscule 2.7%. So, what will happen when the world comes out of this recession? Who will rise up to the challenge and meet our insatiable thirst for energy? These are critical questions not many are willing to ask.</p>
<p>According to the US Department of Energy, liquid fuel demand in the developed nations peaked in August 2005 at 41.89 million barrels per day. Since then, it has plunged by 3.6 million barrels per day to 38.27 million barrels per day. However, you may want to note that despite these tough economic conditions, consumption has been extremely resilient in the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the ‘demand destruction’ hype, it is interesting to note that during this severe global recession, worldwide oil usage has dropped by a minuscule 2.7%. So, what will happen when the world comes out of this recession? Who will rise up to the challenge and meet our insatiable thirst for energy? These are critical questions not many are willing to ask.</p>
<p>According to the US Department of Energy, liquid fuel demand in the developed nations peaked in August 2005 at 41.89 million barrels per day. Since then, it has plunged by 3.6 million barrels per day to 38.27 million barrels per day. However, you may want to note that despite these tough economic conditions, consumption has been extremely resilient in the emerging world. For instance, demand in the developing countries peaked in October 2008 at 46.33 million barrels per day and it is down by only 0.36 million barrels per day! <strong>I am amazed that the worst global recession in decades has barely managed to shrink energy demand in the developing world.</strong> Whilst this is wonderful news for the energy investor, it is a terrible sign for society.</p>
<p>At present, our world is using up roughly 84 million barrels of liquid fuels per day and for the moment at least, there is sufficient supply to meet demand (Figure 1). However, when economic activity picks up, it won’t take much for demand to zip right past supply. Remember, it is much easier to increase usage, but it takes a long time to ramp up production. So, unless this is a permanent global recession (which I doubt), it is inevitable that the price of oil will go up significantly over the medium to long-term.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Figure 1: Supply and demand – balanced for now</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img title="Crude Oil Demand and Supply" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2569/3859068875_88c895eec5.jpg" alt="Crude Oil Demand and Supply" width="432" height="281" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Source: www.yardeni.com</p>
<p>On the supply side of the equation, let me be clear. If I was asked to pick the biggest threat to a sustainable economic recovery, Peak Oil would top that list. Remember, Peak Oil doesn’t mean that we are running out of oil reserves, crude will be around for decades. However, ‘Peak Oil’ does imply that we are dangerously close to peak global oil production. ‘Peak Oil’ also means that rather than experiencing a burst in oil supplies as many expect, from here onwards, we will witness sharp declines in global flow rates. <strong>In a nutshell, the era of cheap energy is over and the price of crude oil will rocket higher over the coming decade.</strong></p>
<p>Now, many skeptics will argue that if Peak Oil was real, the price of oil wouldn’t have dropped to roughly US$30 per barrel in last autumn’s stunning crash. Valid point; but let us not forget that the spectacular plunge occurred at a time when global economic activity virtually came to a standstill. Let us also keep in mind that last autumn’s crash in asset prices was caused by a total freeze in credit and the associated asset liquidation. Whilst I agree that the final action in crude oil’s parabolic blow-off last July smacked of speculation, I can assure you that speculation alone couldn’t have created a multi-year boom whereby the price of crude oil went up by almost 1500%! As you can see from Figure 1 above, supply clearly fell short of demand between 2005 and 2008, and this is why we had a magnificent bull-market in crude oil.</p>
<p>Make no mistake, global demand for liquid fuels will rise again – and if my homework is correct, <strong>supply won’t be able to keep up.</strong> If you ignore the noise and review hard data, you will observe that the vast majority of the world’s most prolific oil provinces are now past peak production and in a state of permanent depletion. According to the BP Statistical Review of World Energy, out of the 54 oil producing nations and regions in the world, only 14 are still increasing production. Alarmingly, 30 oil producing nations and regions are definitely past their peak output and the remaining 10 appear to have modestly declining production rates. Put another way, when weighted by production, Peak Oil is already a grim reality in 61% of the oil producing world!</p>
<p>Still not convinced about Peak Oil? Then review Figure 2, which charts the expected combined flow rates for crude oil, lease condensates and Canadian Oil Sands. As you can see from the grey shaded area, production is about to decline by roughly 5 million barrels per day by 2012.</p>
<p><strong>Figure 2: Has crude oil production peaked?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img title="Peak Crude Oil Production" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3486/3859074551_fba0f597ab.jpg" alt="Peak Crude Oil Production" width="433" height="271" /></p>
<p>Source: The Oil Drum</p>
<p>Ironically, Figure 2 also plots the optimistic (almost laughable) forecast made by the International Energy Agency (IEA) in its “World Energy Outlook 2008”. Interestingly, in last year’s “World Energy Outlook”, the IEA stated that in order to fulfill its optimistic projections, the world had to install 64 million barrels per day of new supply by 2030 or the equivalent of six times the Saudi Arabian output! Furthermore, the IEA declared that the energy industry had to invest hundreds of billions of dollars every year to achieve this favorable outcome.</p>
<p>Now, I can understand that the IEA is a government-funded agency so it has to paint a rosy picture, but <strong>it is ominous that the energy watchdog failed to mention where this surplus oil would come from!</strong></p>
<p>Well, I guess you get the idea. Global crude oil production has probably peaked, new discoveries have dried up and there is a shortage of capital for investment purposes. Apart from these factors, if you believe the energy optimists, all is well in the energy industry and the price of oil is about to drop to zero!</p>
<p>After years of extensive research, I have no doubt in my mind that unless global demand stays weak forever, <strong>we will see supply shortages in the not too distant future.</strong> And before that occurs, the price of crude oil will stage an explosive rally. Accordingly, I suggest that all my readers allocate a large proportion of their investment portfolio to upstream energy companies and to businesses in the energy services sector.</p>
<p>Finally, in the energy complex, the price of natural gas is still scraping along its recent crash low and this is a fantastic long-term investment opportunity. As we approach winter in the Northern Hemisphere and heating demand picks up, we are likely to see a big rally in the price of natural gas. So, investors may want to allocate capital to this unbelievably inexpensive commodity.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Puru Saxena</p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/peak-oil-supply-data-doesnt-lie/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/peak-oil-supply-data-doesnt-lie/">Source: Peak Oil: Supply Data Doesn’t Lie</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/peak-oil-supply-data-doesn%e2%80%99t-lie/20167/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canary in a Gold Mine</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/canary-in-a-gold-mine/19859</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/canary-in-a-gold-mine/19859#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Daughty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gold Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing in gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puru Saxena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Daughty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was dismayed to see <em>The Financial Times</em> article about the new Central Bank Gold Agreement, where central banks agreed to limit their sales of sovereign gold to 400 tonnes a year. The European central banks, which includes the European Central Bank itself and the 16 banks of the Eurozone, plus Sweden’s Riksbank and Swiss National Bank, have all signed on with the new plan.</p>
<p>An interesting new wrinkle in the new agreement that it will “allow the International Monetary Fund to join as a signatory if it wishes”, which it already desperately wishes so that the IMF can aggrandize more power by being a “player” with all the fiat currencies it will collect and then be able to wield like a&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was dismayed to see <em>The Financial Times</em> article about the new Central Bank Gold Agreement, where central banks agreed to limit their sales of sovereign gold to 400 tonnes a year. The European central banks, which includes the European Central Bank itself and the 16 banks of the Eurozone, plus Sweden’s Riksbank and Swiss National Bank, have all signed on with the new plan.</p>
<p>An interesting new wrinkle in the new agreement that it will “allow the International Monetary Fund to join as a signatory if it wishes”, which it already desperately wishes so that the IMF can aggrandize more power by being a “player” with all the fiat currencies it will collect and then be able to wield like a bludgeon.</p>
<p>And this 400 tons of gold per year certainly sounds like a lot, but in reality, how much gold is there?</p>
<p>Well, the article notes that the “gold holdings of the 10 largest signatories total more than 11,000 tons, valued at $350 billion”, and I remember writing down somewhere that the US has about 8,000 tons of gold and the IMF has 3,217 tonnes.</p>
<p>In case you were wondering, I casually mix up “ton” and “tonne” all the time, probably because they are almost the same, so I never bother to try to keep them straight because I am lazy and I don’t care anymore.</p>
<p>For the record, though, one metric tonne contains 32,150.72 Troy ounces, so 11,000 tonnes is 353.661 million ounces of central bank signatory holdings which, at almost $1,000 per ounce, is where I assume they get the valuation of $350 billion.</p>
<p>This, in case you were wondering why I said the words “Central Bank Gold Agreement” with such a sneering tone of scorn and loathing disrespect, is because this is another slimy, five-year, corrupt deal whereby the gold that governments accumulated over the centuries, by committing a continuous series of outrageous, murderous atrocities to acquire, are now selling the gold to get a little “spending money”, to save a little money by not having to pay the expenses of storing the gold, and to happily drive down the market price of gold.</p>
<p>I know what you are thinking! You are thinking to yourself, “Why in the world would the central banks be selling their gold, which drives down the price of gold, which plays right into the hands of The Mogambo, who is happy to buy gold at these bargain prices because he knows that the price of gold will rise meteorically as inflation in the prices of consumer goods rise meteorically in response to the money supply rising meteorically thanks to the Federal Reserve creating it and the federal government borrowing it and then immediately spending it in meteorically-rising amounts for years and years and years, which makes buying gold such a no-brainer that he is known to squeal with girlish delight, ‘Whee! This investing stuff is easy!’”</p>
<p>Well, obviously, since I know that governments send their secret agents to spy on me all the time and sabotage my life, we can be sure that they are not keeping the price of gold down for my benefit! Hahahaha!</p>
<p>No, what they want to do is drive the price of gold down so that the price of gold does not rise against their currencies, which is what you would normally expect from the inflation in prices that would result from these selfsame repellent, dishonorable, corrupt, thieving governments creating additional excessive amounts of paper, fiat money to try to buy their way out of the national inflationary bankruptcy they caused with their prior years of creating and spending excessive amounts of paper, fiat money! Hahaha!</p>
<p>Puru Saxena of Saxena Wealth Management notes, “It is interesting to note that only 160,000 tons of gold has ever been mined from the face of this planet and at US$950 per ounce, it is worth US$4.9 trillion. Now, consider that the total amount of paper money in circulation (currencies, savings, deposits, money-markets and CDs) is worth US$60 trillion, or approximately twelve times the value of the gold in existence.” Wow! Twelve times!</p>
<p>The way I am screaming hysterically that everyone should buy gold reminds me that gold rises in price because its value remains relatively constant, because of all of its valuable inherent properties, while the purchasing power of the paper money used to bid for gold goes down and down, each unit of money buying less and less gold and each unit of gold buying more and more money, which tips everyone off that “That Screaming Mogambo Weirdo (SMW) was right! We’re freaking doomed by inflation! We gotta buy gold, silver and oil right away!” which, naturally, makes their prices rise even further! Whee!</p>
<p>But by flooding the market with government gold, this short-circuits this “canary in a coal mine” (or more properly “Mogambo in a raging snit”) inflation alarm so that us proletariat chumps don’t panic at the horror of huge inflations in prices that are usually reflected in the price of gold which, unfortunately, always follow a huge inflation in the money supply.</p>
<p>This time, because it involves a commodity, I figure that it has the added benefit that slimy insiders/bullion banks can now do all kinds of slimy arbitrage tricks by buying government gold at a (theoretically) falling market price as 400 tons a year come barreling into the market to swamp demand with a deluge of supply, as well as leasing government gold at almost zero percent rates, maybe somehow running it through some Exchange Traded Funds that are shorted for some reason that I don’t understand, maybe hedging risk in the futures and options markets, perhaps bundling together a few derivatives to “lay off risk”, and making money, money, money with which to pay taxes, taxes, taxes, which I figure is the whole point, from the government’s perspective.</p>
<p>It’s like a license to print money while driving down the market price of gold to help disguise the inflationary horrors of, for example, a federal government deficit of 13% of GDP!</p>
<p>The federal budget deficit is almost 1 out of every 8 dollars of national economic activity, and the total amount of government spending will sure be, when including the inevitable future Supplemental Appropriations, over $5 trillion this year, which means that federal government spending – by itself! – is 35.7% of America’s $14 trillion GDP!</p>
<p>Now if you can get me to shut up my screaming, screaming, screaming in horror at such fiscal insanity for one lousy minute, I will add in another $1.5 trillion for the spending by the states and another half trillion by local governments and school boards, and suddenly we are looking at (ignoring double counting the federal aid to the states which is included in the state’s budgets) a potential of $7 trillion in total governmental spending, which is HALF OF GDP!!</p>
<p>I am sure that you noticed the two exclamation points, the way my voice is now screeching at full volume and revolting specks of spittle are flying through the air as I stomp around the room, cursing loudly and incoherently, that I am upset that governments now spend half of the entire economic output of the Entire Freaking Country (EFC)!</p>
<p>If you are a true Junior Mogambo Ranger (JMR), your blood suddenly turned cold and a sense of doom fell upon you.</p>
<p>Now, imagine the horror of those who are NOT, alas, Junior Mogambo Rangers (JMRs), and thus who probably do not buy gold, silver and oil because they do not know that they should be doing that when their government is acting fiscally and monetarily insane!</p>
<p>When you do know, however, investing is easy! Whee!</p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/canary-in-a-gold-mine/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/canary-in-a-gold-mine/">Source: Canary in a Gold Mine</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/canary-in-a-gold-mine/19859/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monetary Inflation Is Our Future</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/monetary-inflation-is-our-future/15304</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/monetary-inflation-is-our-future/15304#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Puru Saxena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[US Dollar & Forex Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monetary Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puru Saxena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US dollar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, Mr. Bernanke announced that the Federal Reserve would buy $300 billion worth of U.S. Treasuries and another $700 billion worth of government-agency mortgage debt. In order to finance these purchases, the Federal Reserve would simply create this money out of thin air.</p>
<p>It is worth noting, that the Federal Reserve has already dropped the Fed funds rate to a historically low range of 0-0.25% and now it is desperately trying to use other unconventional methods (quantitative easing) to stimulate the economy. In my view, this latest development of the Federal Reserve monetizing debt is inflationary and confirmation that the Federal Reserve wants to debase the U.S. dollar. It is worth noting that the total debt in the United States&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, Mr. Bernanke announced that the Federal Reserve would buy $300 billion worth of U.S. Treasuries and another $700 billion worth of government-agency mortgage debt. In order to finance these purchases, the Federal Reserve would simply create this money out of thin air.</p>
<p>It is worth noting, that the Federal Reserve has already dropped the Fed funds rate to a historically low range of 0-0.25% and now it is desperately trying to use other unconventional methods (quantitative easing) to stimulate the economy. In my view, this latest development of the Federal Reserve monetizing debt is inflationary and confirmation that the Federal Reserve wants to debase the U.S. dollar. It is worth noting that the total debt in the United States now exceeds $60 trillion, and its economy is around $14 trillion. So, the United States is already bankrupt, and the only way it can ever hope to repay this gigantic sum is through monetary inflation and debasement.</p>
<p>Allow me to explain:</p>
<p>Suppose your grandparents borrowed $100,000 from their friends roughly 50 years ago. Back then, $100,000 was a lot of money, and the chances of your grandparents ever repaying this loan were slim at best. However, thanks to monetary inflation and the debasement of the U.S. dollar, today, $100,000 isn’t a very large sum of money. Therefore, your grandparents would find it much easier to repay their debt.</p>
<p>Turning to the present situation, the United States owes its creditors a gigantic amount of money and a debt so large that it can never hope of repaying it in today’s dollars. So, the United States has two options:</p>
<p>a. Default or bankruptcy<br />
b. Monetary inflation</p>
<p>Given the fact that the United States is still the world’s largest economy, owns the world’s reserve currency and has a democratically elected government, I think we can pretty much rule out the possibility of sovereign default. Therefore, you can bet your bottom dollar that the United States will try its best to inflate its way out of trouble. Remember, politicians borrow money when it buys them a loaf of bread and they repay it when the same money is worth only a slice of bread!</p>
<p>It is my firm belief that over the years ahead, the United States, and all other debt-laden nations in the West, will engage in massive money-creation in order to debase their currencies and dilute the purchasing power of paper money. Remember, monetary inflation is a debtor’s best friend, as it makes the debt easier to service and repay.</p>
<p>On the other hand, monetary inflation goes against the interests of savers and creditors. Given the fact that most of the ‘developed’ nations are up to their eyeballs in debt, you don’t have to be a genius to figure out that monetary inflation is our future. At present, the global economy is dealing with deflationary forces due to credit contraction in the private-sector. However, even now, total credit in the United States is expanding due to rampant borrowing by the U.S. government. So, I don’t expect deflation to take hold; rather, I anticipate accelerating inflation, which has always led to rising asset and consumer prices.</p>
<p>It is worth noting that apart from the Federal Reserve, other nations have also started monetizing their debt. Recently, the Bank of England announced that it plans to buy GBP150 billion worth of its government debt by creating money out of thin air. Needless to say, such a move is inflationary and terrible for the health of the British currency.</p>
<p>Now that we have established that monetary inflation is our future, let us examine which currencies and assets will maintain their purchasing power. If history is any guide, nations that engage in monetary inflation always diminish the purchasing power of their currency. So, in the years ahead, we can expect currencies in the West to depreciate in terms of purchasing power, but the trouble is that none of the fundamentally sound nations want a strong currency either! As the world engages in competitive currency devaluations, I expect all the currencies in the world to lose significant purchasing power against hard assets. Therefore, in the years ahead, precious metals and other commodities with intrinsic value should appreciate considerably. Even the values of fundamentally sound businesses with clean balance sheets should skyrocket as a result of inflation.</p>
<p>Last week, in the aftermath of the latest announcement by the Federal Reserve, we have seen significant strength in precious metals, crude oil and grains. Conversely, we have seen a huge decline in the U.S. dollar. If the Federal Reserve continues on this inflationary path, we can expect a resumption of the commodities bull-market and renewed weakness in the U.S. dollar.</p>
<p>Contrary to popular opinion, I am of the view that most commodities and stock markets have seen the lows for the entire bear market and we may be in the early stages of a new cyclical bull market that could last for a few years. Now, I am aware that my bullish stance may lead to ridicule from some of my readers, but I would like to point out that new bull markets are always born during abject pessimism and skepticism. Even if some asset prices break to fresh lows in the near-term, I suspect such a move will prove to be a ‘head fake’ and prices will soon rebound. So if you have a 4-5 year investment horizon, now may be a good time to convert some of your temporarily powerful cash into hard assets (precious metals, energy and industrial metals), related producing-companies and sound businesses in the fast-growing Asian economies.</p>
<p>At the current levels, the energy complex looks extremely attractive and should prove to be a fantastic long-term investment. After years of extensive research, I am convinced that the world’s oil production is peaking and we are likely to see much higher energy prices in the future. So, investors may want to add to their positions in upstream oil/gas companies and the energy service stocks. Finally, it looks as though the precious metals complex is becoming over-heated and long-term investors may want to wait for the usual summer correction before adding to their positions in physical gold and silver.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Puru Saxena</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/monetary-inflation-is-our-future/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/monetary-inflation-is-our-future/">Source: Monetary Inflation Is Our Future</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/monetary-inflation-is-our-future/15304/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sowing the Seeds</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/sowing-the-seeds/12149</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/sowing-the-seeds/12149#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Puru Saxena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Economic Slowdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing in silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platinum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puru Saxena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us treasury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=12149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The current economic conditions certainly do not provide any comfort for investors. So, if the economic news remains poor for the foreseeable future, should investors rule out the potential for a significant recovery in asset prices?</p>
<p>The bearish camp is pointing towards Japan and claiming that asset prices will not rebound for many years. According to these folks, corporate earnings will continue to decline and unemployment will rise to much higher levels. So, the bears have concluded that global financial markets will stay depressed for the foreseeable future. It is my observation however that in post-war history (with the exception of the previous recession when stocks were grossly overvalued) stock markets have always commenced a new bull-market prior to the end&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current economic conditions certainly do not provide any comfort for investors. So, if the economic news remains poor for the foreseeable future, should investors rule out the potential for a significant recovery in asset prices?</p>
<p>The bearish camp is pointing towards Japan and claiming that asset prices will not rebound for many years. According to these folks, corporate earnings will continue to decline and unemployment will rise to much higher levels. So, the bears have concluded that global financial markets will stay depressed for the foreseeable future. It is my observation however that in post-war history (with the exception of the previous recession when stocks were grossly overvalued) stock markets have always commenced a new bull-market prior to the end of each recession.</p>
<p>The current U.S. recession commenced late last year, so it has already lasted for more than a year. The average post-war US recession lasted 10 months making this downturn more severe. With the exception of the Great Depression, the worst post-war recessions occurred in 1974 and 1982. Both of these lasted for 16 months, making them the worst recessions since World War II. Now, if we were to assume that the current recession continues well into 2009, this would imply that stock markets will probably bottom out over the coming months.</p>
<p>We must remember that the financial markets are a discounting mechanism and with prices down significantly from their highs, most of the negative news seems to be already factored in today&#8217;s prices. In the past few months, some nations have been brought to their knees, the entire investment banking industry has been decimated, homebuilders have taken huge losses and now auto-makers are facing bankruptcy! For sure, such circumstances are not signs of a major top; rather they are usually associated with the bottom of the business cycle. So, liquidating positions and taking losses during such a pessimistic environment would be a big mistake. On the contrary, the ongoing liquidation of all assets is providing long-term investors with a fantastic buying opportunity. Accordingly, over the past couple of months, I have deployed all of my personal surplus cash reserves into the markets. Now, I concede that it is possible that prices may continue to drift lower in the short-term, but the recent market action suggests that we may have reached an important low. Unfortunately, I cannot state with certainty as to whether or not last quarter&#8217;s low will turn out to be the ultimate low for this bear-market. However, I do know that investors who deploy capital in commodity stocks and bullion today, will probably be sitting on huge profits in 5 years from now.</p>
<p>At present, the markets are extremely oversold relative to their moving averages and investor sentiment is awful. In this environment, I anticipate a multi-month rally in commodities, related stocks and precious metals. Conversely, at the same time, I expect a decline in the U.S. dollar, Japanese yen and U.S. Treasuries. All of these assets appreciated considerably during the liquidation phase and they will come under pressure when the tide changes.</p>
<p>The main reason why I do not foresee deflation (decrease in the supply of money) is due to the fact that the contraction in credit arising from deleveraging is being more than compensated by the money-pumping actions of the various governments. In the past year alone, the Federal Reserve has expanded its balance-sheet by a whopping US$1.2 trillion! Moreover, thanks to Mr. Bernanke&#8217;s cash injections (quantitative easing), reserve balances have sky-rocketed from roughly US$5 billion to almost US$600 billion in roughly 3 months (Figure 1)!</p>
<p><strong>Figure: Lift off in bank reserves &#8211; helicopters being primed?</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/Images/Saxena012109-1.PNG" border="0" alt="" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="547" height="329" /><br />
<strong><em>Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</em></strong></p>
<p>Furthermore, it is interesting to note that the Federal Reserve (money-printer extraordinaire) has now started to inflate the supply of money. Over the past few weeks, the Federal Reserve has injected roughly US$300 billion into the banking system without a proportionate increase in its non-banking liabilities via deposits by the US Treasury. In simple terms, what this means is that the Federal Reserve is now increasing bank reserves without the US Treasury removing an equivalent amount of money from the system. Usually, when the Federal Reserves provides surplus reserves to its member banks, the US Treasury borrows this money from the market by issuing bonds; thereby offsetting the inflationary impact of the Federal Reserve&#8217;s monetary injections. However, this is not what is happening now and this has inflationary implications. Essentially, the Federal Reserve is now creating money &#8216;out of thin air&#8217;, debasing its currency and sowing the seeds for sky-high inflation.</p>
<p>At present, commercial banks are hoarding this cash, but I expect this newly created money to seep through the economy over the following months. When that occurs and credit starts flowing again, business activity will pick up and prices will start appreciating.</p>
<p>In the past few weeks, we have received numerous queries from anxious investors who want to know if we are heading into deflation. Obviously, we don&#8217;t know what will happen in the future, but for now, data shows that all the deflation hype is absurd. If you have any doubt whatsoever as to whether we are facing inflation (expansion in the supply of money) or deflation (contraction in the supply of money), you need to look no further than Figure 2 which highlights the rate at which various nations are inflating the money supply. There is no doubt in this writer&#8217;s mind that deflation is out of the question when the money supply is expanding at such a frantic pace. For the sake of clarification, I must state that what we have witnessed over the past year is not deflation but a contraction in asset prices due to forced liquidation (non-availability of credit).</p>
<p><strong>Figure 2: Inflation is the problem</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/Images/Saxena012109-2.PNG" alt="" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="243" height="204" /><br />
<strong><em>Source: The Economist</em></strong></p>
<p>Now, you may be wondering why there is so much talk about deflation these days when inflation (expansion in the money-supply) is the real issue at hand. There are two reasons for this:</p>
<p>First and foremost, you must remember that banks are in the business of lending and the central banks&#8217; prime objective is to manage inflationary expectations. So, Mr. Bernanke and his comrades are paid to keep a lid on the public&#8217;s inflationary fears. Accordingly, a &#8216;deflation scare&#8217; is engineered ever so often, so that they can continue with their long-term stealth inflation agenda without raising too many eyebrows. Secondly, the establishment needs to advertise a &#8216;deflation scare&#8217; so that the central banks can slash interest rates. If inflation rather than deflation was perceived as the legitimate threat, then the Federal Reserve would not get away with near zero interest-rates.</p>
<p>In summary, I am of the view that the set-backs in our preferred areas (energy, miners, agriculture and bullion) will prove to be temporary and these assets should outperform the broad market once the recovery commences. Finally, it is worth noting that silver and platinum are now unbelievably oversold and they should rally hard and outperform gold over the following months. Accordingly, I would recommend buying some silver and platinum bullion at these levels.<a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/Issues/2009/DR012109.html#essay"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/Issues/2009/DR012109.html#essay">Source: Sowing the Seeds</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/sowing-the-seeds/12149/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Financial &#8216;Armageddon&#8217; Creates Historic Opportunity For Profits</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/financial-armageddon-creates-historic-opportunity-for-profits/9906</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/financial-armageddon-creates-historic-opportunity-for-profits/9906#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Puru Saxena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Rate Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiat Currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing in commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precious metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puru Saxena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=9906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> <strong>Puru Saxena</strong> sees a historical opportunity for long-term gains amid the current financial meltdown.  There is currently around $3.5 trillion sitting on the sidelines, waiting to be invested in strong sectors. Puru says natural resources and industrials still have strong fundamentals, meaning they may never again be as cheap as they are today.</p>
<p>This from The <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links">Daily Reckoning</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Global financial markets are acting as though the world is about to implode. Over the past four months, the investment community has dumped all assets; regardless of their underlying economic fundamentals. We have seen unbelievable wealth destruction on a global scale and trillions of dollars have evaporated and returned to monetary heaven.</p>
<p>The rate of decline has been astonishing and in the past twelve months, the&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <strong>Puru Saxena</strong> sees a historical opportunity for long-term gains amid the current financial meltdown.  There is currently around $3.5 trillion sitting on the sidelines, waiting to be invested in strong sectors. Puru says natural resources and industrials still have strong fundamentals, meaning they may never again be as cheap as they are today.</p>
<p>This from The <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links">Daily Reckoning</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Global financial markets are acting as though the world is about to implode. Over the past four months, the investment community has dumped all assets; regardless of their underlying economic fundamentals. We have seen unbelievable wealth destruction on a global scale and trillions of dollars have evaporated and returned to monetary heaven.</p>
<p>The rate of decline has been astonishing and in the past twelve months, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (Dow) has seen its worst one-year performance &#8211; ever! It is interesting to observe that the Dow&#8217;s recent plunge has been even worse than the 1929 decline which preceded the Great Depression of the 1930&#8217;s (Figure 1). So, are we really witnessing the end of the world as we know it?</p>
<p><img src="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/Images/Saxena120908.PNG" border="0" alt="" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="443" height="325" /><br />
Regardless of the Armageddon fears prevalent today, I would argue that this slump may turn out to be a fantastic buying opportunity for the patient, long-term investor.</p>
<p>Now, the mainstream media seems to be convinced that our planet is headed into a permanent global depression and investor-sentiment certainly reflects this thought process. The same cheerleaders who, only a few months ago, were gleefully shouting about the emergence of a new global economy are now forecasting eternal disaster. Furthermore, investors are liquidating all assets as images of their children living in shanty towns fill their fearful minds. &#8216;Demand destruction&#8217; and &#8216;de-leveraging&#8217; have replaced &#8216;liquidity&#8217; and &#8216;global growth&#8217; as the new buzz-words. Stocks are down significantly from the highs, corporate bonds have taken a beating and even commodities (including precious metals) have joined the bear parade. And those who naively bought structured products from private banks have seen total losses. So, where do we go from here?</p>
<p>The best way to begin is by reiterating that global markets are now extremely oversold and undervalued, hence attractive. This may sound counter-intuitive but it is vital to understand that a decline of 40% in US stocks (and even more in some countries) has set the stage for fantastic long-term gains. If my assessment proves to be correct, investors who buy the unimpaired sectors today should make a fortune over the coming decade.</p>
<p>Remember, the best time to buy is when everyone is despondently selling. As John Templeton (founder of Templeton Funds) often said, &#8220;bull-markets are born on pessimism, grow on scepticism, mature on optimism and due on euphoria&#8221;. And you can be sure that the investment community is feeling extremely pessimistic and fearful today.</p>
<p>At present, a lot of &#8216;gloom and doom&#8217; and &#8216;deflation&#8217; chatter is doing the rounds in the mainstream media. The recent selling panic is frequently being described at the worst crisis since the Great Depression. However, this hype does not imply that the economic outlook is similar to the 1930&#8217;s. One of the biggest reasons why the Great Depression occurred was due to the failure or inability of the money-supply to expand in line with the need for this money. </p>
<p>Furthermore, the failure of roughly 5,000 banks did not help the situation either as millions of Americans lost their savings! In the current situation, however, various central banks and governments are throwing trillions of dollars into the monetary system and all bank deposits have been guaranteed. And if need be, the authorities will print money until the world runs out of trees. So, in my view, a prolonged deflationary phase or a global depression is not likely to happen.</p>
<p>The recent sharp declines in the markets can be attributed to the fact that two separate negative events caught the public&#8217;s attention at roughly the same time &#8211; depth of the financial crisis and fears of a US recession. Now, as far as the first issue is concerned, it is my belief that the worst is behind us. For sure, we may hear of sporadic bank busts in the months ahead, but the recent government guarantees prevented a total collapse of the banking system. For the record, I do not agree with the recent bail-outs because they are immoral and are going to cause huge inflation in the future. However, we all have to deal with reality and for now, it seems that the credit markets are starting to function again.</p>
<p>Our research reveals that currently US$3.5 trillion is sitting on the sidelines, waiting to be invested. And when investors deploy this cash into the markets, it will flow towards sectors which have been unharmed in this financial crisis. Now, I do not know about you, but apart from natural resources (where supply and demand imbalances persist) and industrials (which may benefit from massive government-sponsored infrastructure projects), I cannot find any other sector which has strong fundamentals. Housing faces severe over-supply, autos are struggling, banks will suffer due to over-regulation and consumer discretionary stocks will also fare poorly as the over-stretched public in the West tightens its belts.</p>
<p>The one sector of the economy which remains in excellent condition is commodities. Demand is holding firm, supplies of key resources are still tight and the ongoing credit crisis will only delay many projects which were previously meant to come online. This will create additional supply shortages in the future, thereby leading to much higher prices.</p>
<p>As far as precious metals are concerned, it is worth remembering that our world&#8217;s financial system has been hijacked by money-printers. Whether it is the Federal Reserve, Bank of England or the European Central Bank &#8211; they are all creating money &#8216;out of thin air&#8217; and inflating the supply of paper currencies.</p>
<p>As this rampant inflation continues, what is astonishing though is that so many investors are being hoodwinked into believing that our world faces a genuine deflationary bust. These days, opinion is divided as to whether we will witness continuing inflation or gut-wrenching deflation. In my view, this discussion is absurd and deflation (or a contraction in the supply of money) is out of the question.</p>
<p>Banks are in the business of lending money and debt creation is essential for their very survival and prosperity. So, you can be sure that the modern-day money lenders will find a new way to further expand the supply of money and debt.</p>
<p>Whilst paper currencies (cash) regained some purchasing power in the past few months due to forced liquidation in the asset markets, there is no chance that they will maintain their value over the medium to long-term. History is littered with numerous paper currencies which became totally worthless and I suspect many of the current ones will also disappear. In fact, a remarkable study confirms that only 23% of paper currencies ever issued have survived the test of time! The vast majority were destroyed due to hyperinflation and are no longer in circulation.</p>
<p>Accordingly, I would urge investors to sit tight with their positions in hard assets (precious metals, energy and agriculture) and add more capital at such depressed levels. Under the best-case scenario, global markets bottomed out over the past two months and even if they did not, at the very least, we should get a multi-month rally in commodities and related stocks.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/DR_07/Archives/DRArchives2008-2.html">Source: The End of the World…Or the Right Time to Buy?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/financial-armageddon-creates-historic-opportunity-for-profits/9906/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bailouts Will Bring Short-Term Relief, Long-Term Catastrophe</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/bailouts-bring-short-term-relief-long-term-catastrophe/8024</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/bailouts-bring-short-term-relief-long-term-catastrophe/8024#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Puru Saxena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyperinflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puru Saxena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All of the nations that have resorted to money-printing in the past, ultimately saw a total economic collapse,&#8221; says <strong>Puru Saxena</strong>. The government bailouts and stimulus packages may provide some short-term relief, but the long-term hyperinflation and damage to the dollar will be much, much worse.<br />
</p>
<p>This from The <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links">Daily Reckoning</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Let there be no mistake; the U.S. has now transformed itself into a great socialist society by using taxpayers&#8217; money to buy-out private companies. In my view, this ridiculous measure is a slap in the face of capitalism and will further promote reckless and dubious practices. Essentially, by bailing out the behemoths (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and <strong>AIG</strong> [NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=AIG">AIG</a>]) and allowing the smaller fish (Lehman Brothers) to fail, the U.S. establishment is&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All of the nations that have resorted to money-printing in the past, ultimately saw a total economic collapse,&#8221; says <strong>Puru Saxena</strong>. The government bailouts and stimulus packages may provide some short-term relief, but the long-term hyperinflation and damage to the dollar will be much, much worse.<br />
</p>
<p>This from The <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links">Daily Reckoning</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Let there be no mistake; the U.S. has now transformed itself into a great socialist society by using taxpayers&#8217; money to buy-out private companies. In my view, this ridiculous measure is a slap in the face of capitalism and will further promote reckless and dubious practices. Essentially, by bailing out the behemoths (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and <strong>AIG</strong> [NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=AIG">AIG</a>]) and allowing the smaller fish (Lehman Brothers) to fail, the U.S. establishment is sending out the following message:</p>
<p>&#8220;If you want government protection, please become too big to fail. If your demise threatens our entire financial system, we will help you. Otherwise, we will let you fail.&#8221;</p>
<p>There can be no doubt that this policy of &#8217;selective socialism&#8217; is totally insane for several reasons. First and foremost, who has given these officials the power to decide which company is worth saving and which one is insignificant enough to fail? Next, what kind of message are they giving to the remaining banks &#8211; please merge quickly and grow in size or else you will be allowed to fail? Furthermore, America already has a horrendous debt problem (debt to GDP ratio in excess of 400%) so who has given the U.S. Treasury the authority to take on more debt? Finally, who is going to pay for these trillions of dollars of bailouts?</p>
<p>Although these bailouts may offer short-term respite, I am of the opinion that the recent antics of the U.S. establishment will make matters much worse over the mid- to long-term. History has shown time and time again that no nation has ever printed its way to prosperity. In fact, all the of the nations that have resorted to money-printing in the past, ultimately saw a total economic collapse. </p>
<p>Furthermore, the middle-class and the impoverished people in those countries got totally wiped out due to runaway inflation. And apart from a handful of rich people who were able to ride the inflationary wave, everyone else suffered a great deal. I wish I could come up with more cheerful news, but I am afraid the same economic outcome is likely in the United States. If the clowns in Washington continue with their senseless inflation agenda by adding more monetary fuel to an already raging fire, I suspect we will see a massive deterioration in the American way of life.</p>
<p>Now, I am aware that the majority of commentators and pundits are applauding the recent bailouts. According to these folks, the bailouts were necessary to prevent an outright collapse of the financial system and the government intervention also helped to restore calm in the financial markets.</p>
<p>For sure, the recent nationalization of assets may have helped the markets in the near-term, however I fail to see how it can be good for the global economy over the long-term. Remember, it was the same reckless money-printing in the aftermath of the NASDAQ bust which caused this massive financial crisis, and now the U.S. establishment is throwing more money into the system! In the short-term, this injection of liquidity may act like a shot of heroin for the desperate drug addict, but in the longer-term, this dosage of monetary poison will end up killing this terminally-ill patient. After all, how can these bailouts be good when they will further destroy the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar? How can these measures be hailed by the investment community when they will cause food and energy prices to skyrocket in the years ahead? How can more monetary inflation be good if it punishes savers at the expense of debtors?</p>
<p>Make no mistake, this reckless monetary inflation will eventually cause the U.S. dollar to become worthless and America may have no option but to issue a new dollar bill (Figure 1). And if other nations also embark on this inflationary road to nowhere, we will see a terrible hyper-inflationary depression with currencies plummeting against tangible assets.</p>
<p><strong>Figure 1: US Treasury&#8217;s new dollar bill?</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/Images/Saxena110608.PNG" alt="" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="484" height="213" /><br />
<strong>Courtesy: Hank &amp; Ben&#8217;s Money Printing Corporation</strong></p>
<p>Despite the horrendous economic environment we find ourselves in, it is fascinating to observe the sheer denial amongst the investment community. Most fund managers, economists and analysts still want the public to believe that the United States is not in a recession and that its housing situation is about to improve! Nothing could be further from the truth. How can the United States not be in a recession when entire industries have been wiped out? </p>
<p>Next time, when somebody tells you that the U.S. economy is stronger than you might think, please ask them which industry or group of industries are growing? As far as I am aware, investment banks, automobiles, homebuilders, consumer discretionary and mortgage related businesses are all facing a severe slump. Yet, Mr. Bush and his comrades have no problem in citing the strength of the American economy.</p>
<p>In summary, I maintain my view that the current crisis is far from over and I suggest that you stay well clear of the financial sector. Although, the financial companies may seem cheap due to the recent declines, I can assure you that they could get a whole lot cheaper. The truth is that nobody knows what is on and off the balance sheets of these institutions and at the very best, we may see a lengthy period of consolidation before we get a sustainable recovery in financial stocks.</p>
<p>As far as the broad market is concerned, I suspect the stock market is extremely oversold at the current levels and we may get a technical rally over the coming weeks. Unfortunately, our fundamentally superior resources stocks got sold off in the recent stock-market rout and this may be the best opportunity you will ever get to buy solid, viable companies at such fire-sale prices. So, if you have not done so already, I suggest that you invest your capital in energy, food and metals as these assets are likely to move higher when the newly created &#8216;money&#8217; seeps through the system.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/Issues/2008/DR110608.html#essay">Source: Selective Socialism</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/bailouts-bring-short-term-relief-long-term-catastrophe/8024/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of an Era?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/end-of-an-era/4510</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/end-of-an-era/4510#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Puru Saxena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puru Saxena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/end-of-an-era/4510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Lets face it, the era of easy money and cheap oil has come to an end.</p>
<p>There is no doubt in my mind that since the early 1970&#8217;s the global economic boom has been largely financed by an ever-expanding quantity of money and credit. Once gold was removed from the monetary system in 1971, central banks were free to create as much paper currencies as they wanted. This reckless monetary inflation and credit growth has caused the value of &#8220;money&#8221; to diminish significantly over the past three decades and created a gigantic boom in global asset prices. Each time an asset &#8220;bubble&#8221; has burst in the past 35 years, central banks have responded by reducing interest-rates, thereby encouraging even more credit&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets face it, the era of easy money and cheap oil has come to an end.</p>
<p>There is no doubt in my mind that since the early 1970&#8217;s the global economic boom has been largely financed by an ever-expanding quantity of money and credit. Once gold was removed from the monetary system in 1971, central banks were free to create as much paper currencies as they wanted. This reckless monetary inflation and credit growth has caused the value of &#8220;money&#8221; to diminish significantly over the past three decades and created a gigantic boom in global asset prices. Each time an asset &#8220;bubble&#8221; has burst in the past 35 years, central banks have responded by reducing interest-rates, thereby encouraging even more credit growth, which has spawned further speculative manias down the road. This time around, in the aftermath of the Anglo-Saxon housing bust, Mr. Bernanke and his comrades are desperately trying to do the same and the trillion dollar question is whether they will succeed.</p>
<p>In the current circumstances, I suspect it will be extremely difficult for the central banks to further expand credit growth, thereby inflating their way out of trouble. Below I present the reasons why I am doubtful about the continuation of the credit bubble:</p>
<p>First and foremost, in the current credit crisis, the entire banking system is being brought to its knees. This is very different to the previous crises when perhaps a handful of financial institutions or hedge funds got into trouble. Unfortunately, the financial alchemy (creation of structured products, over the counter derivatives, collateralized debt obligations, credit default swaps etc.) over the past few years has been so severe that the entire banking system is now on the verge of a total collapse. So, even if the central banks tried to further inflate the credit bubble by keeping interest-rates low for an extended period of time, I doubt if the commercial banks are in any position to expand their balance sheets. With billions of dollars of write-downs in the past year and humungous &#8220;Level 3&#8243; liabilities still undisclosed, the commercial banks have no other option but to try and repair the damage to their balance sheets by tightening credit standards. So, I doubt very much if they (for the foreseeable future) will participate in the central banks&#8217; sponsored credit and inflation agenda.</p>
<p>Secondly, I also happen to think that as a result of so many ridiculous tax-payer sponsored bail-outs of Wall Street banks, the U.S. government and regulators will tighten their grip over the ministry of inflation (the banking industry). Therefore, tighter regulation in the months ahead will also prevent the commercial banks from inflating the credit bubble further.</p>
<p>Another reason why I believe we have reached the inflection point in this credit cycle is the state of the U.S. dollar. With the U.S. dollar trading at record-lows against major world currencies and soaring energy and food costs, I doubt very much if the Federal Reserve is in a position to lower interest-rates further. In fact, I would argue that the situation is totally out of the Federal Reserve&#8217;s control and the entire global economy now depends on the mercy of the owners of U.S. Treasuries. I have to admit that so far, given the amount of bail-outs and the state of the U.S. dollar, holders of U.S. government bonds have been rather well behaved. However, it may only be a matter of time before foreign holders of U.S. Treasuries start liquidating their holdings. When that occurs, long-term interest-rates in the United States would rise rapidly and the Federal Reserve would have no other option but to raise its Fed Funds rate.</p>
<p>Finally, given the level of indebtedness of the U.S. consumer and falling asset prices, I wonder how the average American household would be able to take on even more debt. Once the technology bubble burst at the turn of the millennium and the Federal Reserve lowered interest-rates, Americans were quick to borrow and speculate in real-estate. However, this time around in the aftermath of the housing bust, even though the cost of borrowing has been reduced, Americans are not going deeper into debt. U.S. bank credit peaked earlier this year and is now in a decline. So, if American households are really tightening their belts and repaying their outstanding debt, there is no way the credit bubble would continue to inflate.</p>
<p>It is my observation that we have now entered a new era of credit contraction and deleveraging. The abrupt bursting of the credit bubble is likely to have a profound impact on asset prices in the West. If my view is correct, we are likely to see a period of poor economic growth and deflating asset prices in the developed world. The U.S. economy is clearly struggling, Europe faces its own problems and Japan cannot seem to turn things around. So, I would not advise you to invest your capital in stock markets or real-estate in the industrialized nations.</p>
<p>There can be no disputing the fact that U.S. financial assets have provided disappointing returns since the beginning of this decade. It is worth noting that even though the Dow Jones index is flat in nominal terms since 2000, it has lost more than half of its value against gold over the same period. At the turn of the millennium, the level of the Dow Jones could buy over 40 ounces of gold. Eight years later, the level of the Dow Jones can only buy roughly 12 ounces of gold! Clearly, gold has been a much better investment than U.S. stocks over the past eight years. In the years ahead, I expect to see further underperformance of financial assets and maintain my position that hard, tangible assets will continue to provide superior returns.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Puru Saxena<br />
for <em>The <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links">Daily Reckoning</a></em></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com/Issues/2008/DR081208.html#essay">End of an Era?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/end-of-an-era/4510/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is a Good Investment During Stagflation?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/what-is-a-good-investment-during-stagflation/2850</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/what-is-a-good-investment-during-stagflation/2850#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Traynor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities Boom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puru Saxena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stagflation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/what-is-a-good-investment-during-stagflation/2850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite Ben Bernanke&#8217;s assertion yesterday at Harvard University that the US economy is not returning to the <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/06/05/bernanke_fed_is_intent_on_preventing_stagflation/" title="Open a new browser window to learn more." target="_blank">stagflation of the 1970s</a>, slower growth and rising inflation have many wondering what is a good investment during stagflation should the Fed chief&#8217;s bravado prove to be wrong.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/bill-bonner/"  class="alinks_links">Bill Bonner</a> says it took Paul Volcker&#8217;s leadership, along with a crippling recession, to <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/what-came-first-inflation-or-the-egg/2785" title="Open a new browser window to learn more.">end stagflation</a> in the 1970s:</p>
<blockquote><p>Well, we repeat ourselves, what ultimately turned the situation around at the end of the ’70s was a change in regime at the Fed…the worst recession since the ’30s…and a whipsaw on Wall Street that whacked both the bond market and then the stock market, wiping out more than half the value of each of them.</p>
<p>At the end of the&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite Ben Bernanke&#8217;s assertion yesterday at Harvard University that the US economy is not returning to the <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/06/05/bernanke_fed_is_intent_on_preventing_stagflation/" title="Open a new browser window to learn more." target="_blank">stagflation of the 1970s</a>, slower growth and rising inflation have many wondering what is a good investment during stagflation should the Fed chief&#8217;s bravado prove to be wrong.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/bill-bonner/"  class="alinks_links">Bill Bonner</a> says it took Paul Volcker&#8217;s leadership, along with a crippling recession, to <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/what-came-first-inflation-or-the-egg/2785" title="Open a new browser window to learn more.">end stagflation</a> in the 1970s:</p>
<blockquote><p>Well, we repeat ourselves, what ultimately turned the situation around at the end of the ’70s was a change in regime at the Fed…the worst recession since the ’30s…and a whipsaw on Wall Street that whacked both the bond market and then the stock market, wiping out more than half the value of each of them.</p>
<p>At the end of the ’70s, the jig was up. When everyone had come to expect more inflation from the Fed, the central bank no longer saw any benefit in it. Its new money and credit was being anticipated and absorbed – in wage and price increases – even faster than they made it available. Inflation no longer worked, in other words. It no longer deceived businessmen into thinking they should expand production. It no longer deceived investors into believing their assets were going up in value. And even the lumpen householders had caught onto the game; as soon as they got a wage increase, they spent it quickly…and then demanded another one.</p>
<p>The feds didn’t have much choice. They could either inflate much more heavily than expected and wait for the disaster to catch up to them…or they could admit that the flimflam no longer worked, raise rates, and squeeze the “inflationary expectations” out of the system. Paul Volcker took the latter course. That, combined with the natural feedback look of the oil cycle – in which higher prices drew forth new supplies, as they always do – sent the price of oil back down. In today’s dollars, a gallon of gasoline sold for about $1.50 from 1986 until 2003.</p>
<p>Volcker’s anti-inflation Fed also knocked the price of gold down from over $800 in 1980 to around $275 in 1998.</p>
<p>Of course, many people expect a repeat of the story. They see inflation rising…oil over $125…and gold over $900 (it closed yesterday at $897)…and it makes them feel 30 years younger; they think they see “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman” on TV again and Jimmy Carter in the White House. Soon, they believe, the Fed will begin raising rates; oil will fall back to $70; gold will crash back below $500; and inflation will go back to sleep.</p>
<p>And maybe it will happen. But we’re a long way from it, in our opinion. We haven’t really had the run up in consumer price inflation yet. Forget the eggs, say the feds. According to their numbers, the CPI is only increasing at 4% per year. Not too bad. Nothing to get excited about. And certainly no reason to renegotiate a union contract.</p>
<p>Nor has there been a big sell-off in the bond market. Only very recently have yields on the 10 year note crept up over 4%. And yesterday, they sank back under the 4% mark. Wait until they’re over 8% &#8212; then, we’ll talk!</p>
<p>And as for the stock market &#8212; what’s the problem? Stocks got killed in the ’70s…they were down 75% to 90% in inflation-adjusted terms. But what has happened in the stock market recently? The Dow is still within 10% of its all time high. And over the last 10 years, in nominal terms, it is up 2.5%.</p>
<p>No, dear reader, we have a long way to go before we can have a genuine recovery. First, we need something to recover from.</p></blockquote>
<p>Puru Saxena in The <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links">Daily Reckoning</a> says that since the Fed started slashing rates last year <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/growth-inflation-debate/2316" title="Read more.">commodities have skyrocketed</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>As an investment-manager, it is not my role to pass a moral judgment on the actions of central banks and governments.</p>
<p>To be fair, given the level of debt imbedded in the West, central banks have no other option but to inflate. The problem though for the U.S. economy stems from the fact that this newly created money seems to be finding a home in commodities rather than financial assets.</p>
<p>It is interesting to note that since the Federal Reserve started slashing interest-rates in August last year, energy, metals and food prices have gone to the moon, whereas the U.S. dollar and American stocks have plummeted.</p>
<p>Unfortunately for the U.S. establishment, the &#8216;cure&#8217; of monetary inflation seems to be going horribly wrong as it is translating into even higher consumer and producer prices. I have long maintained that this decade would belong to commodities and the markets are proving me correct.</p>
<p>Over the past few months, the prices of commodities have gone through the roof due to supply and demand imbalances and massive monetary inflation. However, given the turmoil in the markets and loss of confidence, resource stocks have been punished by investors.</p>
<p>This development is strange to say the least, and it has paved the way for a massive buying opportunity in the most coveted sector of the future. I find it absurd that the investment-community is dumping quality resource stocks at a time when the underlying commodity prices are super strong.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, businesses are valued based on their corporate earnings, and with sky-high commodity prices, I can assure you that elite resource-producing companies are going to announce fantastic results in the months ahead.</p>
<p>Today, top-quality diversified mining companies are selling at 12-13 times earnings (bear-market valuations) and I can only guess this is due to the fact that most people expect commodity-prices to crash in the months ahead.</p>
<p>However, if my homework is correct and commodity prices continue to soar in the future, we will see a major re-rating in the valuations of resource-producing stocks. Some of you may remember that during the technology mania at the turn of the millennium, technology companies (even dodgy ones) sold for ridiculously high valuations.</p>
<p>Well, we can expect to see the same type of madness in relation to commodity stocks in the future.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/what-is-a-good-investment-during-stagflation/2850/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.275 seconds -->
