I call them the “zombies,” the institutions being propped up by government bailouts. Companies like Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC), General Motors Corp., Chrysler LLC, etc. On an operating level, these walking dead are sucking the life out of the recovery.

Unlike in previous downturns, huge resources have been devoted to propping up entities that should have been taken out of the picture.

Of course, it’s easy to avoid zombies directly. No one is going to force you to take a position in GM. But if you really want to know where to look for the bargains – for companies that have the greatest potential for serious growth in real numbers and real markets – you need to look for what I call “zombie-free zones.”

Unfortunately, the United States and the United Kingdom are not “zombie-free” zones – and thus offer the worst hunting ground available right now.

If you’re looking for something solid, there are only three places to aim your portfolio. In fact, my top three picks are…

Germany, Korea, and Canada.  All have an abundance of companies you can invest in with at least a good chance of not being forced to compete with the undead.

The Problem with Zombies

You see, the problem with zombie banks and companies is that they soak up resources that should be devoted to living banks and companies, while providing unfair competition that makes their competitors unsound.

It’s difficult to see this effect at the moment, because the U.S. Federal Reserve is propping up the banking sector. It’s much clearer in the automobile sector, where the zombies GM and Chrysler make it more difficult for Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) to compete. There’s no question that the continued existence of Chrysler after its first non-bankruptcy in 1979 drastically weakened Ford in the 1980s and 1990s.

There’s the effect on wages too. The United Auto Workers (UAW) union is a huge supporter of the GM and Chrysler rescues, partly because they keep UAW members employed at above-market wage rates. One certainly can sympathize with the great many American autoworkers that have lost their jobs, but by keeping the sector over-employed, the government is driving up wages and hurting businesses – particularly Ford, the only member of Detroit’s “Big Three” to not ask for a bailout.

The same effect can be seen in the banking sector. The bonus pool at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) is partly inflated by the continued employment of all the Citibankers who should have lost their jobs. Since banking pay scales got over-inflated during the bubble, it is reasonable now for them to come back down to earth, but that’s not going to happen while banks are in their current undead state.

Turning to the international market, it is immediately clear that Britain has the same problem as the United States, only on a larger scale. Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC (NYSE ADR: RBS) and Lloyds Banking Group PLC (NYSE: LYG), two of Britain’s largest banks have been kept open by the government. (Though, to be fair, Lloyds only got in trouble because the government made it acquire another failing bank, HBOS.)

Financial services is a huge part of Britain’s economy, which needs to diversify, but it won’t be able to diversify if so much of its talent is locked up in banking, and its best graduates are sucked into the high-paying dealing rooms of the City of London.

Japan has the same problem. Here the zombies are really ancient, cobwebbed skeletons left over from the 1990 collapse of Japan’s bubble. Some of them were put out of their misery by Junichiro Koizumi, the reformist prime minister, in 2003. Yet just this week we learned that many Japanese retailers face losses because of competition from The Daiei Inc. and Ito-Yokado Co. Ltd., gigantic retailing companies that were effectively bankrupt in 1993 but have been propped up by Japan’s banks. If you’re afraid of zombies, Japan is really creepy!

Historically, Europe is the continent where investors have suffered most from zombies propped up by governments. Certainly some countries, notably Italy, are attractive only for investment necrophiliacs.

Where to Find “Zombie-Free Zones”

There are some exceptions. Germany has only a few relatively small zombies. Both Sachsen LB and IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, the banks that got in trouble buying U.S. subprime mortgage-backed bonds, have been sold to other buyers – Sachsen to a larger Landesbank and IKB to the private equity group Lone Star Funds. Whatever their subsequent fate, those banks are currently being managed on a profit-maximizing basis.

There is a large older zombie, Hypo Real Estate Holding AG, the former Bayerische Hypothekenbank, which got in trouble in the late 1990s lending to real estate in the former East Germany, but that appears an isolated example. Industrially, Germany has been admirably rigorous in cleaning up its dead companies, and with its new pro-market government looks attractive for zombie-fearing money.

In Asia, South Korea is probably your best bet. The country had a big zombie problem ten years ago, but that problem has been cleared up with the bankruptcy and reorganization of several conglomerates and much of the banking system. This time around, there have been few major casualties and so the economy looks relatively zombie-free.

Finally, there is our northern neighbor, Canada. Canadian housing never became as over-extended as U.S. housing, and the Canadian bank bailout was correspondingly smaller, with none of the banks facing bankruptcy. Canada had a bad zombie problem fifteen years ago from decaying heavy industry, but today those zombies are long gone and the Canadian economy is resilient. The most recent bankruptcy, Nortel Networks Corp. (OTC: NRTLQ) in Jan. 2009, is being handled in a thoroughly market-oriented fashion, with its assets being sold off piecemeal. So your money is safe in Canada – lots of snow, but no zombies!

Source: Why You Need to Look at these Three ‘Zombie-Free Zones’

Plains Exploration & Production Company (PXP) is an independent oil and gas company primarily engaged in the activities of acquiring, developing, exploring and producing oil and gas properties primarily in the United States. The Company owns oil and gas properties with principal operations in Onshore California; Offshore California; the Gulf of Mexico; the Gulf Coast Region; the Mid-Continent Region, and the Rocky Mountains. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had estimated proved reserves of 292.1 million barrels of oil equivalent, of which 61% was comprised of oil and 72% was proved developed.

According to a recent 13G filed with the SEC, Soros Fund Management has a 5.38% ownership stake in PXP as of April 21 2009. Soros’s company now owns 6,467,400 shares.

Soros is global macro investor with a stellar track record, both during the time he partnered with Jimmy Rogers in the Quantum Fund and one his own through Soros Fund Management. Soros Fund Management finished up 8% last year – one of the worst years on record for fund performances.

“Without giving specific names, most of the significant American banks, the larger banks, are bankrupt, totally bankrupt,” Rogers said in a recent teleconference at the Reuters Investment Outlook 2009 Summit. “What is outrageous economically and is outrageous morally is that normally in times like this, people who are competent and who saw it coming and who kept their powder dry go and take over the assets from the incompetent. What’s happening this time is that the government is taking the assets from the competent people and giving them to the incompetent people and saying, now you can compete with the competent people. It is horrible economics.”

A long-time China bull, Rogers first made a name for himself with The Quantum Fund, a hedge fund that’s often described as the first real global investment fund, which he and partner George Soros founded in 1970. Over the next decade, Quantum gained 4,200%, while the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index climbed about 50%.

It was after Rogers “retired” in 1980 that the investing masses first really got to see him in action. Rogers traveled the world (several times), and penned such bestsellers as “Investment Biker” and the recently released “A Bull in China.” He also made some historic market calls: Rogers predicted China’s meteoric growth a good decade before it became apparent to everyone else, and he subsequently foretold of the powerful updraft in global commodities prices that’s fueled a year-long bull market in the agriculture, energy and mining sectors.

Rogers’ candor has made him a popular figure with individual investors, meaning his pronouncements are always closely watched. Twice last year Rogers granted exclusive interviews to Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald. In one of the interviews – carried each time as two-part series in Money Morning – Rogers correctly predicted that the U.S. financial crisis was destined to get much worse before any improvement was visible.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) analysts last week estimated that banks worldwide have incurred $850 billion of credit-related losses and write-downs since the global credit crisis began last year.

But Rogers said sound U.S. lenders remain. He said these could include banks that don’t make or hold subprime mortgages, or which have high ratios of deposits to equity – “all the classic old ratios that most banks in America forgot or started ignoring because they were too old-fashioned.”

Many analysts have cited the Sept. 15 bankruptcy filing by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (OTC: LEHMQ) as a trigger for the soon-to-follow cratering of the U.S. stock market and accompanying worsening of the U.S. economy.

But Rogers called that idea “laughable,” noting that banks have been failing for hundreds of years. And yet, he said policymakers aren’t doing enough to prevent another Lehman.

“Governments are making mistakes,” he said. “They’re saying to all the banks, you don’t have to tell us your situation. You can continue to use your balance sheet that is phony ” All these guys are bankrupt, they’re still worrying about their bonuses, they’re still trying to pay their dividends, and the whole system is weakened.”

Jim Rogers: $700 Billion Banking Bailout is ‘Horrible Economics’

This secret is important… It is the only way I know for you to really make ridiculous gains from investing without taking on crazy risks. The man I first heard the idea from actually did make ridiculous gains following it…

Jim Rogers made more than 4,000% in his Quantum Fund in the 1970s, when the overall stock market only rose 47%. (Then he retired in 1980, at age 37.)

Jim’s track record when he ran the Quantum Fund may be the best of anyone, ever. He was interviewed after he retired for a book called Market Wizards (which first came out in the late 1980s). In that book, he said something that has stuck with me since:

Markets often rise higher than you think is possible,
and fall lower than you can possibly imagine.

This was a revolutionary idea for me, at the time – a true “secret” to ridiculous gains.

Using his own secret, Jim Rogers could have bought oil at $13 a barrel a few years ago, and he could still be holding it at $130 a barrel today. Your typical investor would have sold somewhere along the way. But not Jim.

———- Advertisement ———-
Two Simple Words that Could Make You Rich

There’s a simple 2-word secret to generating bigger, faster gains on every trade you make.

In fact, most of the world’s richest traders use it to grow and protect their wealth…

… Like the legendary David Ryan – who used this secret to win the prestigious U.S. Investing Championship 3 times with a remarkable 3-year return of 1,379%.

Click here to learn how you can use it.
————————————-

(If anyone actually did buy at $13 and hold to $130, it was probably Jim. He started his Rogers Commodity Index Fund back in 1998, when oil bottomed, and he’s still a commodities bull today.)

In the mid-1990s, Jim and I sat next to each other at a black-tie dinner. We talked for hours. He struck me as one of the most original thinkers I’d met. After that dinner, I went back and re-read his chapter in Market Wizards.

I realized his quote, “Markets often rise higher than you think is possible, and fall lower than you can possibly imagine” was incredibly powerful. Once I adopted it, it allowed my readers to make huge fortunes…

The most recent huge winner is Seabridge Gold. I recommended shares of Seabridge at $2.64 to my subscribers a few years ago. Today it’s up to $23. We knew the markets could go higher than we imagined, so we didn’t get out too early. I might not have had the conviction to hold it that long without help from Jim Rogers.

Jim Rogers’ quote has made me – and my subscribers – large amounts of money. But this year, my biggest mistake was forgetting the other half of the quote: Markets can fall lower than you can possibly imagine.

Banks and homebuilders – two things I believe are cheap and hated – have fallen lower than I could have possibly imagined. I bought in too early. I thought I saw a glimmer of an uptrend. So far I’ve been wrong. Jim’s rule was right, as always. So right now, I’m watching my trailing stops closely on these.

If you want to make a whole lot of money investing, you have to stick to your rules. Jim Rogers’ rule is one of the most difficult to stick with… but it is one of the most profitable.

Oil moving up 900% is a great example of the market rising higher than you think possible. And financial stocks and housing, unfortunately, are a good example on the downside.

“Markets often rise higher than you think is possible, and fall lower than you can possibly imagine.”

This rule will make you a lot of money. And both halves of the rule are equally important.

Good investing,

Steve

Source: Fixing My Big Investment Mistake This Year

Drug companies large and small have renewed their interest in one specific health care sector. It’s a true form of preventative medicine — a rapidly growing field that’s already decimated countless dangerous and deadly diseases.

Now biotechs and Big Pharma are in a race against time. Their mission is clear: Rid the world of the onslaught of superbugs and diseases that could cause the next great epidemic. And they’ll use second-generation technology to create some of the world’s most powerful drug saviors.

There’s money to be made in this field — and it hasn’t gone unnoticed by some of the planet’s top investors…

**********Only 10 Hours Remain **********

Respond Today and Get 50% Off the Millionaire’s Market

You’ve seen it before, so I won’t waste your time… If you act before tonight at midnight, I’m willing to do something very special for you.

I’ll give you a full 50% off the normal one-year price of Resource Trader Alert.

But space is extremely limited. And when the clock strikes midnight tonight, I’ll be forced to close this offer… So, read this before it’s too late…

**************************************

George Soros’ resume is nothing short of impressive. His legendary Quantum Fund returned investors an average 42.5% per year for 10 years — a total of 3,365% gains. In 2007, he raked in a staggering $2.9 billion, making him the Street’s No.1 earner for the year…

And then there’s Warren Buffett — an investor who needs no introduction. An initial $10,000 investment in Buffett’s famous holding company Berkshire Hathaway would have been worth more than $1.2 million at the end of last year…

Sure, they’ve made their money by occasionally taking different routes. However, Soros and Buffett are “sharing” some intriguing ideas these days, according to James Altucher, managing director of Formula Capital and author of Trade Like Warren Buffett. The two moguls are putting up big bucks for health care, he says, with a concentration on vaccines…

This bit of info may go against perceptions of Buffett as the ultimate value investor. Altucher claims this is a common misconception. Rather, Buffett is what he calls a “long-term demographic investor.”

That’s why Buffett and Soros are investing in health care and biotech stocks like GlaxoSmithKlein, Johnson & Johnson and Sanofi Aventis. These companies have a lot in common — most importantly, they are the world’s most prolific developers of vaccine treatments.

We’ve found an opportunity Warren Buffett can’t get his hands on — an opportunity to get in on not one, but two emerging biotechs in a race to create the ultimate cancer vaccine. More on them in just a minute…

**************************************

Superleverage: The Secret to Getting Rich in the Market

Back in 2003, you could have bought AngloCold stock for $32 and done very well when it climbed to $41 three weeks later. That’s a nice gain of 28%…

But if you had used my Superleverage technique, you would’ve turned that 28% gain into 528% in no time flat, with limited risk. See how it works here…

**************************************

The New Way to Fight Disease

For years, the vaccine landscape was ruled by the basics — measles, mumps and rubella. And, of course, annual flu shots for the elderly and those affected with immune disorders. The market for vaccines was relatively stagnant. In 2005, vaccines accounted for less than 3% of the global pharmaceutical industry, according to the Wharton School of business.

It just wasn’t very profitable to make cheap flu shots. And the antiquated process of incubating the inactive viruses to go into the shots is time-consuming, and the shots are easily contaminated.

Now we’re looking at a transition to a different kind of vaccine. In fact, we saw the wave of next-generation vaccines hit the development pipeline as early as three years ago. Professors at Wharton saw the transition coming:

“In the past, a lot of attention was paid to the childhood vaccines, but more and more research and development is focusing on vaccines for adolescents and young adults, or even on adult vaccines for diseases such as cancer,” Wharton health care systems professor Patricia Danzon commented more than two years ago. “The health system approach to vaccines really has to adapt to accommodate these new products.”

This quote appears very prophetic today. Just look at Merck’s recent success…

Merck’s most recent quarter, reported in May 2008, saw revenue rising to $5.8 billion, with much of its sales growth attributed to Gardasil, the company’s blockbuster cervical cancer vaccine.

Merck, along with many of the other major drug companies, is in the process of developing numerous vaccine treatments for a variety of diseases — some common, some deadly.

We’ll keep our eyes open. Until next time…

Best,
Greg Guenthner

With an economy that’s advancing at an average annual clip of better than 11%, $1.7 trillion in currency reserves, and an emerging middle class that will soon be the world’s largest, China represents the future to globally focused investors and businesses alike. But there’s always been a concern about just how resilient China’s economy actually would prove to be.

Rogers urged investors to dump such concerns.

In fact, according to Rogers, when it comes to the Red Dragon, only one thing could cause this powerful expansion to wash out: A major water crisis.

“China has a huge water problem,” he said. “In Northern China, they’re running out of water. They know this and they’re working on it, big time. But if they don’t solve it, or if they don’t solve it in time, then China – as you put it – has failed.”

Rogers first made a name for himself with The Quantum Fund, a hedge fund that’s often described as the first truly global investment vehicle, which he and partner George Soros founded in 1970. Over the next decade, Quantum gained 4,200%, while the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index climbed about 50%.

It was after Rogers “retired” in 1980 that the public first really got to see him in action. After traveling the world on a motorcycle, Rogers penned the best seller “Investment Biker” – and gained the moniker: “Adventure Capitalist.” And he’s used the “on-the-ground” insights he gained on that trip and others that followed to make some truly historic market calls: Rogers predicted China’s meteoric growth a good decade before it became apparent to other investing “experts,” and he subsequently foretold of the powerful updraft in global commodities prices that is continuing to fuel a year-long bull market in the agriculture, energy and mining sectors.

In his newest best seller, “A Bull in China,” Rogers writes about China and the commodities boom, and details dozens of ways investors can profit from these trends.

Given Rogers’ prescience – not to mention all the uncertainty that right now surrounds the U.S. economy – we thought it was well worth a sit-down with the noted guru, even if it meant traveling all the way to Singapore, where he now lives with his family, to do so.

During that hour-long interview at his home in Singapore’s exclusive Orchard Park district – with the two of us talking as he pedaled his exercise bike furiously, despite the morning heat – Rogers also said that:

• Oil prices are only going to go higher.
• That Russia will continue to “strip itself” of assets, meaning it will never emerge as an economic force.
• And that the U.S. dollar’s woes will continue.

Let’s take a look at some of the highlights of the Money Morning interview with investor and author Jim Rogers.
Keith Fitz-Gerald (Q): Can you see an instance where China fails?

Jim Rogers: Of course. Anybody – and everything – can fail. But [let’s consider] the main problem first.

I don’t worry about war or epidemics or depression or even political upheaval. Everybody has had that. America had horrible problems. We had a terrible Civil War. We had political leaders regularly assassinated 125 years ago. We had massacres in the streets. We had no human rights. We had no rule of law. You could buy and sell congressmen. You can still buy and sell congressmen in America, but they were much cheaper in those days.

America had many disasters, and yet it became the great success story of the 20th Century. As recently as 1907, the entire system went bankrupt in America: The government, Wall Street, everything. And yet, America came out of that and went on to big things.

All of those things can happen in China and would be temporary setbacks. I don’t consider any of them being the end of the China story.

The only thing that worries me permanently about the China story is water.

I’ve been around the world twice. I’ve seen many cities, societies, [and] nations that disappeared because the water disappeared. China has a huge water problem. In Northern China, they’re running out of water. They know this and they’re working on it, big time. But if they don’t solve it, or if they don’t solve it in time, then China – as you put it – has failed.

By the way, Northern India has the same problem, only worse. Many places have it now. Water is becoming a huge problem worldwide. The same is true in the Southwestern United States. You know, you may have Arizona going to war with California. Some sections of Nevada, Colorado …they’re desperate there.

So it’s not just China – but water’s the main thing that worries me about China.

As I say [that] civil war would be a terrible thing in China, but it’d be a temporary setback, as would epidemics, as would economic setbacks, [and as would a] depression. But China will come out of all that and keep going forward. Now, I don’t anticipate war in China – even civil war – but I’m suggesting that if it happened, I don’t see it as the end of the story any more than it was the end of the story in the United States.

Q: There’s a confluence of money flowing into and around China. Do you believe that the United States, with all its current problems, will get left out of this powerful and important trend?

Rogers: Absolutely.

The U.S. dollar is a terribly flawed currency. I’m trying to get all of my money out of U.S. dollars. I don’t know why anybody would put money into the U.S. dollar, and by extension into the U.S., as we stand here today. The U.S. is probably the largest debtor nation the world has ever seen!

The United States’ foreign debts are increasing at the rate of $1 trillion U.S. dollars every 15 months. U.S. foreign debt is over $13 trillion, and rising rapidly. It’s the official policy of the central bank to debase the currency. They’re trying to drive down the value of the dollar.

Q: Is the Chinese Renminbi the next great “liquidity haven” if the U.S. dollar fails? Or do you see the Euro rising to the occasion?

Now, at the age of 77 Soros is making the rounds to promote his new book, “The New Paradigm for Financial Markets,” which goes on sale next month. And while he travels the media circuit he’s taking the opportunity to speak his mind on the country’s current financial crisis, which Soros considers the “biggest financial crisis” of his lifetime. Last week, he echoed the International Monetary Fund’s estimate of more than $1 trillion in losses linked to the collapse of mortgage-backed securities. However, Soros pointed out that losses so far disclosed by financial institutions are related only to the decline in value of those financial instruments.

“I think it’s a pretty accurate estimate of the loan losses,” Soros said during a conference call with reporters. “But we have not yet seen the full effect of possible recession. It only relates to the decline in the value of the various financial instruments which are held by the banks and other institutions.”

They don’t “in any way reflect possible decline in the quality of loans that they hold. These are the eventual losses yet to be seen,” he added.

Almost 50 of the world’s biggest banks have recorded a combined $232 billion in asset write-downs and credit losses since the beginning of 2007, according to Bloomberg data.

Soros described the $45 trillion market in credit swaps – which gives investors the opportunity to place bets on the likelihood that companies will default on bond payments – as the “Sword of Damocles.”

“This $45 trillion market is unregulated,” he said. “That’s more than five times the entire government bond market of the United States. It’s almost equal to the entire household wealth of the United States.”

As far as accountability is concerned, Soros blames regulators and the current U.S. administration, which he says “failed to perform their job.”

“This is a man-made crisis and it’s made by this false belief that markets correct their own excesses,” he said. “It will take much longer for the full effect of the decline in the housing market to be felt.”

He continued: “I think the situation is more serious than the authorities admit or recognize. They claim that there will be a pickup in the second half of the year. I cannot believe that.”