Gold broke through the psychologically important $1,000-an-ounce level for the first time in 18 months yesterday (Tuesday) as the U.S. dollar slumped against key foreign currencies, exacerbating investor fears that loose fiscal and monetary policies will spur inflation as the U.S. economy recovers.

The thinly traded September futures contract for gold traded as $1,006.90 an ounce on the COMEX division of the New York Mercantile Exchange, or NYMEX (Nasdaq: CME), the highest level for a short-term futures contract since March 18, 2008, MarketWatch.com reported. The contract closed the day yesterday at $997.90, up $3, or 0.3% for the trading session.

The London gold fixing – a global benchmark – traded as high as $1,000.75 an ounce yesterday. Its previous high was also on March 18, 2008.

Now that gold has pierced that technical barrier, some analysts are looking for the yellow metal to return to its all-time-record high of $1,033.90 an ounce – a record set last March.

“The higher the price, the higher the volatility, but this market is so concerned with inflation possibilities and dollar weakness that momentum is bringing more investors to the ‘Buy’ side,” George Gero, a precious-metals trader for RBC Capital Markets (NYSE: RY), told MarketWatch.com.

Gold struggled to breach the $1,000 price level last week. Yesterday’s surge corresponded with a drop in the value of the U.S. dollar, which fell to its lowest point versus the euro this year.

“We had a good technical break higher last week and now the weaker dollar is helping gold progress higher,” Saxo Bank senior manager Ole Hansen told Reuters. “We are finally taking out some levels we haven’t seen for a while, especially in the currencies. On that basis, I would assume we will go up to test the highs from last year.”

The dollar fell as low as $1.45 per euro in morning trading yesterday, its weakest level since Dec 18, 2008, according to Bloomberg News. The euro has risen by about 15% against the dollar in the past six months.

Analysts have warned for months that the combination of a soaring budget deficit and expansive monetary policy could weaken the dollar and spur inflation.

The federal budget deficit for 2009 will reach a record $1.6 trillion, more than three times 2008’s record deficit of $455 billion, the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said last month.

From 2010 to 2019, the deficit will balloon to $7.14 trillion, the CBO says, while the White House paints an even uglier, $9 trillion picture for the same period.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Federal Reserve has injected more than $2 trillion into the U.S. financial system and its benchmark lending rate remains at a record low range of 0.00%- 0.25%.

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke has provided few clues about exactly what his so-called “exit strategy” will involve, or when it will be implemented. However, the Fed chairman has said that the Federal Funds rate will remain “exceptionally low” for “an extended period” of time, as the U.S. economy trudges toward recovery.

Few analysts believe Bernanke will even start to rein in the Fed’s fiscal stimulus before he’s absolutely certain an economic recovery is underway. Now, with the belief that inflation is hiding around the corner, investors are piling back into gold to hedge against the dollar’s decline.

“In the last year alone, the U.S. Federal Reserve has actually doubled the U.S. monetary base,” said Peter Krauth, a Money Morning contributing editor who is also the editor of the Global Resource Alert trading service. “That can only lead to serious inflation, perhaps even hyperinflation.  This will cause the value of the U.S. dollar – which has been eroding since 2001 – to decline at an even-more-frenetic pace.”

Krauth expects that gold prices will shoot even higher in the months and years to come, not just because of the dollar’s devaluation, but because demand is on the rise and global mining output is in decline. Global mine output has decreased at an annual compound rate of 0.8% from 1999 through 2008, according to GFMS Ltd.

In the meantime, demand for the yellow metal has skyrocketed. During the fourth quarter of 2008, for instance, North American and European purchases of gold coins and gold bars rose 811% over the same period the year before. And while demand for jewelry has flattened, new investment vehicles have made purchasing gold much easier for the average investor.

“Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have been a tremendous catalyst for swelling gold demand,” said Krauth, noting that the SPDR Gold Trust (NYSE: GLD) – the largest physically backed ETF on the planet – is now the sixth-biggest holder of gold bullion in the world.

The SPDR Gold Trust fund held 1,077.63 metric tons of gold totaling more than $34 billion in value as of yesterday, according to its Web site.

“Indeed, the fund’s influence on the market is such that it actually seems as if every year or so it moves up past year another nation in the global rankings of gold-bullion holders,” said Krauth.

Buying the SPDR Gold Shares is one way to get in on the gold rush. The fund’s price fluctuates in concert with the price of gold and it’s more convenient than buying gold bars directly.

For investors who are looking to hedge against the enormous inflationary pressures that are believed to be filtering through the U.S. economy, buying stakes in gold miners is another potential strategy to follow.

In this case, the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSE: GDX) – composed chiefly of major gold miners – offers both company and geographic diversification, while including substantial leverage to the price of gold.  Market Vectors is based on the AMEX Gold BUGS Index (HUI), which represents a portfolio of 15 major gold mining companies that do not hedge their gold production beyond a year and a half.

Source: Gold Aims to Retest Record Highs After Breaking Through the $1,000 Mark

• A day after posting better-than-expected quarterly earnings, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) sold $5 billion in stock to repay federal bailout money. All totaled, Goldman sold 40.65 million in shares at $123 a piece, 5.5% below Monday’s closing price, Reuters reported. Goldman received a total of $10 billion from the Troubled Asset Relief Program.
• Amsterdam-based Royal Phillips Electronics NV (PHG) said its cost-reduction program will save the company more than 500 million euros ($664 million) this year, Bloomberg reported. The announcement came with its quarterly earnings report, in which Europe’s largest consumer-electronics maker reported its second-consecutive loss.

• First quarter earnings for pharmaceutical and health care retail giant Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) fell, but beat estimates by cutting costs, Reuters reported. The company $3.51 billion, or $1.26 a share, in the first quarter compared with $3.6 billion, or $1.26 a share, in the first quarter last year. Johnson & Johnson reaffirmed its 2009 profit forecast of $4.45 to $4.55 a share.

• Singapore’s economy may shrink 6% to 9% this year, the government said in its third reduced forecast this year. To counter contraction, the government will adjust the trading range of the Singapore dollar. “The situation is really dire and the central bank’s policy will improve sentiment and help the economy,” Vishnu Varathan, an economist at Forecast Singapore Pte., told Bloomberg.

• Discover Financial Services (DFS), will cut 500 jobs in May, or 4% of its workforce, Reuters reported, citing company sources. Discover, the fourth-largest U.S. credit card network, last month posted a deeper-than-expected quarterly operating loss, cut its dividend and set aside more money to cover bad loans as defaults increase.

• In a sign bankers are gaining confidence that the worst of the financial crisis is over, the London inter-bank offered rate (LIBOR) for three-month dollar loans is dropping at the fastest pace since January, Bloomberg reported. Debt strategists at Credit Suisse Group AG (ADR: CS) Societe Generale SA (ADR: SCGLY) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY), three of the 16 banks that provide the data that sets Libor each day, say the declines will continue.

• Weak demand and a supply glut could cloud the coal industry’s prospects for the rest of the year, even as U.S. coal miners are likely to show strong quarterly profits this month, Reuters reported. But big U.S. coal producers should weather the economic downturn because they sold much of this year’s production at higher prices negotiated before the recession hit last September. Coal prices are expected to stay low throughout 2009 until production cuts by major miners begin to restrict the coal supply.

• Madoff Securities International Ltd., filed for bankruptcy protection in Florida under Chapter 15 of the federal bankruptcy code. The code is designed to block U.S. lawsuits against foreign companies reorganizing overseas that have U.S. operations, Bloomberg reported. Bernard Madoff pleaded guilty last month to 11 counts including fraud and money laundering for directing the largest Ponzi scheme ever.

Source: Global Investment News Briefs Wednesday April 15, 2009

Here are four tightly regulated stocks Mark recommends that are selling at “incredible bargains. ”

The U.S. financial system is a mess – according to the World Economic Forum, the United States ranks 40th among banking systems around the world. Without federal bailouts, the two largest banks in the country, Citibank (NYSE: C) and Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), would be in bankruptcy, and the good ol’ USA would be headed for the Greater Depression, as my friend Doug Casey likes to call it.

But you’ll never guess where the world’s No. 1 banking system is. No, it’s not fabled Switzerland nor booming Hong Kong.

While the central banks around the world are desperately trying to stem the flow of red ink, this country’s red is emblazoned on its iconic mounted police force.

It’s right next door: Canada. The land of hockey and moose has the world’s soundest banking system. While European and Asian banks are collapsing, Canada stands out as an oasis of financial calm.

Canadian Banks Receive Highest Rankings

According to the Global Competitiveness Report, Canadian banks received the highest ranking, 6.8, out of a possible 7.0 (healthy, with sound balance sheets). The lowest ranking of 1 means insolvent and possible government bailout.

Canada’s stock has been rising quietly – the Canadians are known for their modesty and self-restraint – as American financiers and media are astonished to find that their northern neighbors have somehow avoided the subprime lending scandal and the housing market mess.

What’s Canada’s secret? With the exception of oil-rich Alberta, Canada did not have a strong construction surge as the United States did during the boom years. And mortgage interest is not tax deductible in Canada.

Canadian banks are national in scope; the top five banks have branches in all 10 Canadian provinces, making them less susceptible to downturns. They have large numbers of loyal depositors and a more solid base of capital. They are more tightly regulated than their U.S. counterparts, more liquid and less leveraged.

Canadian Banks – 4 of The Top 10 Largest North American Banks

Among the top 10 largest banks in North America, 4 are Canadian banks:

• Royal Bank of Canada (NYSE: RY),
• Bank of Nova Scotia (NYSE: BNS),
• Bank of Montreal (NYSE: BMO),
• and Toronto Dominion (NYSE: TD), which bought Commerce Bank last year.

Canadian bank executives don’t have to be excoriated by Parliament before taking a pay cut. The CEOs of Canada’s three-largest banks have all voluntarily cut their own pay in response to the global economic crisis.

Canada has its share of problems – being linked to commodity prices – but financially it’s done a better job than its southern neighbor. While the Bush administration ran up massive deficits year after year, Canadian officials finally pushed through a stimulus package that resulted in the government’s first deficit in a decade!

Right now, the Canadian banks are selling at incredible bargains. With operating margins exceeding 30%, and dividend yields between 6% and 8%, Canadian banks are selling at only around eight times earnings. Bank of Montreal is my favorite – it’s selling for only six times this year’s expected earnings and is yielding 10%.

During a crisis, the good investments get hit like the bad ones. But when the markets recover, the good bank stocks will skyrocket, especially those across the border.

Source: Canadian Banks: An Oasis of Financial Calm

“The misguided macroeconomic and monetary policies, especially the confiscatory tax policy and huge government spending – much of it inefficient – was doomed to catch up with the country someday,” says Horacio Marquez, a Wall Street veteran, emerging markets specialist and editor of two trading services affiliated with Money Morning: The Money Moves Alert and the Shadow Stock Trader services.

Argentina’s act of not-so-petty larceny was launched late last month when the government, in a surprise move, ordered Argentine pension funds to liquidate their foreign holdings, the first step in a plan to transfer that money into the state pension system. Argentine President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner said she abolished the 14-year-old private pension system to protect pension money at a time of global turmoil and denied the government had grabbed the cash to service its crushing debt, which officials told The Financial Times is now about $21 billion.

The reality is, however, that surpluses from the state system – known as “Anses” – already have been a key source of government funding, especially in the past year, after a surge in the number of workers returning to the state plan caused its holdings to surge substantially. Expect the use of those surpluses to continue.

Indeed, the government is clearly hoping that the addition of the assets from the private pension system will create an even-bigger surplus that it can use to service its debt. Otherwise, the government might have to cut back significantly on the spending programs that benefit Argentine citizens. And since 2009 is an election year, such cutbacks aren’t an option.

But the strategy is fraught with peril. First, the decision “effectively killed the primary institutional investor in its emerging capital market,” the World Bank said. “Confidence in this market has predictably suffered from this measure, the latest in a series of government meddlings.”

The move calls to question what the government will do about the $10 billion in private investments, including the shares of both foreign and domestic firms.

That makes Anses the country’s biggest investor in its capital markets, whose liquidity and depth will become greatly reduced, The FT said. And the disappearance of the private pension funds will raise a lot of concerns over how the government will be able to keep a steady supply of credit available to consumers, whose spending drives the economic growth in that country, as it does here in the United States.

The lack of available credit major combined with a downturn in confidence in the Argentine financial system might well be the double-whammy that pushes Argentina into a major downturn, which could easily translate into another debt default.

Haunted by Past Problems

To really understand what happened, we need to turn back the clock to 2001, when Argentina – Latin America’s second-largest economy – found itself on the brink of financial collapse. A loss of confidence in the country and its policies induced a surge in capital flight and a major run on the nation’s banks, as investors and Argentine citizens alike exchanged pesos for U.S. dollars, which they then sent abroad.

Argentina was forced to default on the lion’s share of its public debt, estimated at $93 billion. Even today, however, an estimated 30% of Argentina’s bondholders still refuse to accept the 70% discount the government offered to settle the default.

Even in a world not currently gripped by a global credit crisis, Argentina would likely have found it impossible to obtain the finding needed to finance its government operations. But the financial crisis is a stark reality, meaning that the few sources of funding that remain available in the world markets are not open to Argentina.

And with Argentina’s agriculture-heavy domestic economy slumping badly – and now certain to feel the sting of the plunge in food-and-commodity prices – the central government is left with a possible debt-payment shortfall of as much as $10 billion for next year.

“With the abrupt drop in commodity prices, it left Argentina’s ‘cleptocratic’ government little room other than to confiscate private savings in order to reduce its chances of defaulting again in 2009,” says Marquez.

Default Déjà Vu?

There are some disturbing similarities between Argentina’s current economic crisis and the economic malfeasance that led the country to default on its debt in 2001.

Then, as now, the government faced accusations of corruption and mismanagement of debts. Argentina’s current president, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, succeeded her husband, former President Néstor Kirchner, in December 2007. Like her husband, President Kirchner has been accused of employing dubious accounting tactics.

It is widely believed that the current president Kirchner has underreported Argentina’s inflation situation by replacing members of the state statistical office with handpicked analysts “friendlier” to the administration’s view.

During Kirchner’s husband’s administration, which ran from 2003-2007, several industries were nationalized. Despite having campaigned on a socialist platform of “returning to a republic of equals,” he nevertheless oversaw the state takeover of the postal system, water works and railways.

The pattern of the Argentine government’s failure to acknowledge economic reality continues.

The legislature recently passed the budget for 2009, that bases its financial assumptions on 4.0% economic growth (as measured by gross domestic product growth), 8.0% inflation, and a currency valued at 3.19 pesos for each U.S. dollar (despite the fact that it currently takes 3.33 pesos to buy one U.S. dollar), MercoPress reported.

Many economists feel Argentina’s economic growth is likely to be much lower. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) predicts just 1.0% GDP growth for 2009. And some economists have predicted inflation as high as 20%.

Current President Kirchner has chosen to blame the global financial crisis for the government’s need to grab of private sector assets – without acknowledging the role that her administration, and the domestic economy, have played in the current economic crisis.

“There was a [private] system that spectacularly collapsed. This was a policy of looting,” Kirchner said in an attempt to justify the nationalization, the AFP reported.

“It is evident that when nobody regulates the market, nobody controls it and it is allowed to do what it wants, we wind up with a financial disaster like the one the global economy faces,” she added.

But it’s widely acknowledged that without the projected $4.5 billion to $5.0 billion in worker inflows to the private pension system next year, coupled with the current $24 billion in deposits, the Argentine government would find itself dangerously close to another default.

Despite all of the similarities between Argentina’s past and current economic troubles, there’s one important difference for global investors.

During Argentina’s prior collapse, Mexico and Brazil – large Latin American economies and important Argentine trading partners – were faced with their own economic crises. It cast a pall over Latin American investing for emerging markets and international investors. But that’s not the case this time around.

“Argentina, unlike Mexico, China and Brazil, is a fairly closed economy,” says Shadow Stock Trader editor Marquez. “Therefore, the impact to other economies from the Argentine pension nationalization is almost negligible.”

Argentina’s Economic Isolation

Even with its strong average economic growth of 9% for the past several years, Argentina hasn’t been a smart place to park investments since the 2001 crisis.

During the prior economic collapse, large numbers of business owners and foreign investors alike yanked all of their cash out of the Argentine economy and sent it to safer havens aboard. Needless to say, this caused a capital squeeze, and many businesses of all sizes failed, causing unemployment to soar, and government receipts to plummet. With no sources of income, many struck out on their own, without the presence of the owners and their capital, as self-managed “cooperatives.” This helped create some economic and job growth where there was none, and eventually the economy started to rebound.

Although GDP has grown consistently and quickly since 2003, it was only in late 2004 that it reached the levels of 1998 – the last year of growth prior to the recession. Other macroeconomic indicators have have shown a similar rebound pattern.

Strong commodity prices fueled an economy that counts soy as its biggest export, but government mismanagement and questionable economic policies continue to make Argentina a poor investment.

Standard & Poor’s Inc. recently downgraded the country’s credit rating to B-, well below investment grade.

“It’s a textbook definition of an economic disaster,” Nick Chamie, head of emerging-market research at RBC Capital Markets Corp. (RY) in Toronto, told Bloomberg News. The S&P ratings reduction “confirms what the rest of the market knows – that Argentina is close to default and that risk is very high.”

But the good news for global investors is that Argentina’s problems are unlikely to spill over into the economies of its healthier Latin American neighbors.

Even Brazil, Argentina’s largest trading partner, is likely to be unaffected by its Latin American neighbor’s current economic trouble. Argentina accounts for only 9% of Brazil’s exports. And the planned liquidation of foreign assets in Argentina’s pension funds will amount to just $540 million worth of in Brazilian equities – too little to have much of an impact on the Brazilian market.

“Argentina’s government does not pass the first ‘C’ of credit analysis: character,” says Money Morning’s Marquez. “It is not only the ability to pay [its debt-service payments], but the willingness to do it and the track record in doing this that matters.”

Compared to the fiscal responsibility of neighbors Brazil and Chile, Argentina’s history of borrowing and default make it a bad bet.

Latin America still hosts several choice investment opportunities, but you won’t find them in Argentina.

“The nationalization of pensions in Argentina shows the escalation of confiscatory government policies,” says Marquez. “In this environment, where flagrant violations of property rights are escalating, Argentina is no place to invest.”

Source: With its Pension Fund Grab, is it ‘Déjà Vu All Over Again’ For Argentina?

The rally was sparked by commitments from the major financial nations to cooperate in getting the credit markets functioning again, and by news that U.S. officials were putting the finishing touches on Washington’s version of a rescue plan under which the U.S. Treasury Department will invest an estimated $125 billion in nine major U.S. banks, and another $125 billion in smaller financial institutions, Bloomberg News reported early this morning (Tuesday).

The White House announced that U.S. President George W. Bush would meet at 7:30 a.m. EDT today with members of his financial markets working group. He’ll make a statement about the plan at 8:05 a.m. U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry M. “Hank” Paulson Jr., U.S. Federal Reserve Chief Ben S. Bernanke and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chair Sheila C. Bair will discuss the plan during an 8:30 a.m. news conference, MarketWatch.com and Bloomberg both reported.

“These are tough times for our economies, yet we can be confident that we can work our way through these challenges and America will continue to work closely with the other nations to coordinate our response to this global financial crisis,” President Bush told reporters yesterday following a meeting with Italy Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi at the White House.

After an eight-day losing streak – the worst for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index since 1996 – those dramatic worldwide developments were enough to spawn a rally of historic proportions in U.S. shares. The S&P 500 rebounded from its worst week in 75 years with an 11.6% advance, jumping 104.13 points to close at 1,003.35. The Dow zoomed 936.42 points, or 11%, to close at 9,387.61 – eviscerating the previous record of 499 points, set in March 2000, and posting its best percentage gain since 1933.

The Nasdaq Composite Index climbed 194.74, or 12%, to 1,844.25. Sixteen stocks gained for each that fell on the New York Stock Exchange.

Last week’s 18% declines pushed both the S&P 500 and Dow down more than 40% from their peaks last October.

The S&P 500 ended the trading day Friday at 17 times reported earnings of its companies, the cheapest valuation in more than a year. Yesterday’s really boosted the Price/Earnings ratio to 19.2. The S&P 500 is still down 32% this year, positioning it for its worst yearly loss since 1937.

“The worst of the immediate danger is past,” Bruce McCain, chief investment strategist at Key Private Bank (KEY) in Cleveland, which manages $30 billion, told Bloomberg, the well-known financial news service.“It’s always easier when you’ve got markets going up and you’re not having to talk clients back in off the ledge.”

Kevin Divney, chief investment officer at Putnam Investments in Boston, told Bloomberg Television that “the real catalyst is the levels of valuation.”

But not everyone was quite so sanguine. Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald cautioned that one strong day in the markets – even a record one – doesn’t necessarily mean there’s a full-fledged rebound in store.

“The real economic growth rates in the financial sector are unclear,” Fitz-Gerald said in an interview. “To say that it’s an accounting nightmare is an insult to the Hollywood honchos who actually make their living transforming nightmares into movies. Fiction writers could not concocted a better horror story than the one that’s rocked world financial markets since last November. Despite all the mergers and acquisitions, and the emergency bailouts, that we’ve seen to date, Wall Street hasn’t even begun to address the underlying business prospects – on anything more than a superficial level – of the lion’s share of the companies that are being bailed out.” [For Fitz-Gerald’s full take on yesterday’s market action – including some insights on how he believes investors should navigate the uncertainty – check out his special market commentary that appears elsewhere in today’s issue.]

All 10 industries in the S&P 500 added more than 7%. Monday’s worldwide rally – which ranged from Tokyo to New York – sent the MSCI World Index up 9.5 %, the biggest gain since the gauge was created in 1970, MarketWatch reported.

The bond market was closed for the Columbus Day holiday. The dollar fell the most in three weeks against the euro.

Details of a Bailout/“Rescue” Plan

On Sunday, the major European Union nations committed more than $2.3 trillion to safeguard their banks and financial system, according to The Associated Press.  Global efforts to rescue the international banking system gathered force yesterday, with Europe leading the way to provide money to shore up its financial sector and calm traders, and the U.S. hinting it’s on board with its own rescue plan, MarketWatch reported. [For details of the sweeping European rescue plan, check out this related report elsewhere in today’s issue of Money Morning.]

U.S. bankers were summoned to the Treasury Department yesterday, as the U.S. government prepared additional measures to stabilize markets, reported the U.S. shortwave broadcasting service, The Voice of America.

Over the weekend, Treasury Secretary Paulson had called the heads of the five biggest U.S. banks to come to Washington for face-to-face talks about the rescue plan, according to people briefed on the matter. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) Chief Executive Officer Lloyd C. Blankfein, Morgan Stanley (MS) CEO John J. Mack, Citigroup Inc. (C) CEO Vikram Pandit, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon and Bank of America Corp. (BAC) CEO Kenneth D. Lewis were all asked to attend, according to The AP.

The CEOs had been in Washington this past weekend to meet with international finance officials at the annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank. This group of U.S. banking sector leaders met with Paulson and Fed Chairman Bernanke for about three hours yesterday, several news sources have said.

When asked for precise details about the plan that’s to be unveiled early today, U.S. Treasury officials remained mum. Indeed, sources would only say that it would include a “series of comprehensive actions to strengthen public confidence in our financial institutions and restore functioning of our credit markets.”

However, after the CEO meetings, some details began to leak out. Industry insiders speculated late yesterday that the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department had outlined a plan to inject as much as $250 billion of the $700 billion rescue plan into top U.S. banks.

In addition, to jumpstart “Interbank” lending, the FDIC would actually insure new senior preferred debt for three years.

The Treasury Department would take the equity stakes in banks using authority it was granted under the $700 billion bank rescue plan enacted two weeks ago.

“We’re talking about making investments in these banks in a way that doesn’t necessarily punish existing shareholders,” Charles Bobrinskoy, vice chairman of Ariel Investments LLC, which manages $13 billion, said on Bloomberg TV. “Most of the bank actions to date in the U.S. have been good for bondholders but terrible for common stockholders.”

Government actions this year to prevent bankruptcies at investment bank Bear Stearns Cos., mortgage lenders Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) and insurer American International Group Inc. (AIG) resulted in near-total losses for the firms’ shareholders.

The collapse of New York-based Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEHMQ) on Sept. 15 precipitated the latest chapter of the 14-month-old credit crisis, causing banks to stop lending to each other out of concern they may not get their money back.

Direct investments of this magnitude represent a new approach for Treasury Secretary Paulson, who initially advocated a bailout targeted at illiquid mortgage-related assets. When the markets didn’t respond positively to earlier plans, the Treasury Department shifted gears – in a big way.

“They’ve decided they need to do something drastic and this is drastic,” Gerard S. Cassidy, a bank analyst at RBC Capital Markets (RY) in Portland, Maine, told Bloomberg.

The proposed cash injections in exchange for preferred shares are said to be destined for Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC), JP Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. (MER), Morgan Stanley, State Street Corp. (STT), and Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (BK).

“The government has gone to ‘Plan B’ and it packs a big wallop,” Frederic Dickson who helps oversee $25 billion as chief market strategist at D.A. Davidson & Co. in Lake Oswego, Oregon, told the financial news service.

The Treasury plans to spend $25 billion each for stakes in Citigroup and JPMorgan, people said. Another $25 billion will be divided between Bank of America and Merrill, which agreed last month to be acquired by Bank of America. Wells Fargo is to get at least $20 billion, Goldman and Morgan Stanley will each get $10 billion, and State Street and Bank of New York will get about $3 billion each, people said.

The government will obtain its stakes with a type of security designed not to dilute the value of common shares.

None of the nine banks getting government money was given a choice about it, said people familiar with the plans. All of the banks involved will have to submit to compensation restrictions as mandated by Congress, people said.

The remaining $125 billion will be used to recapitalize other financial institutions around the country, the people said. Neel Kashkari, the U.S. Treasury official overseeing the rescue of the financial system, yesterday said the equity purchases would be aimed at “healthy” firms.

Source: Dow Zooms to Record Gain Yesterday on Reports The Government Will Reveal Banking Bailout Plan Details Early Today

In fact, every one of the 101 economists surveyed by Bloomberg said that they thought the Fed would leave rates unchanged.

Money Morning’s Jennifer Yousfi examines why the likelihood of further rate cuts has fallen in recent days…

The U.S. Federal Reserve faces a tough challenge as it kicks off a two-day policymaking meeting tomorrow (Tuesday): It probably needs to start raising interest rates to prop up the U.S. dollar and offset a major escalation in inflationary pressures; but the economy needs low interest rates if it’s to maintain its anemic growth rate. After one of the Fed’s most aggressive rate-cutting campaigns ever slashed short-term interest rates from 5.25% in mid-September to 2.0% now, experts now expect the central bank to reverse course. And this week’s two-day meeting of the policymaking Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) represents the first chance for the central bank to boost its benchmark Federal Funds rate.

Recent hawkish comments by central bank Chairman Ben S. Bernanke had led some analysts to expect a 25-basis point rate increase at this meeting, but front page stories in both The Wall Street Journal and The Financial Times are detailing softened expectations.

The odds of an increase have fallen: Fed Funds futures traded on the Chicago Board of Trade are pricing in a 10% chance of an increase in this overnight lending rate. Any announcement will likely be made at the conclusion of the FOMC meeting on Wednesday. Prior to the recent news stories, the odds were about 22%. Odds of a rate increase at the FOMC’s August meeting also fell.

Investors also will be interested in the accompanying FOMC statement that will be released around 2:15 p.m. EDT on Wednesday.

The statement after the last FOMC meeting acknowledged inflation concerns, but maintained that economic growth was still the top priority. A more-balanced statement is expected this time around as commodity prices continue to soar and oil recently flirted with a new high of $140 per barrel.

Many analysts have called for interest rate increases to stem inflation and prop up a weak greenback, which only serves to fuel the increases in dollar-denominated commodities such as oil. The dollar dropped last week against all major currencies, according to Bloomberg data, falling to $1.562 against the euro on Friday.

“The re-emergence of financial concern places a question mark on the Fed’s ability to raise interest rates,” Matthew Strauss, a senior currency strategist in Toronto at RBC Capital Markets Inc., a unit of Canada’s biggest bank Royal Bank of Canada (RY), told Bloomberg News.

Referring to the April 22 high of  $1.6019, Strauss said that “the possibility of a revisit to $1.60 is still in the cards.”

Even if the volatile costs of food and fuel are excluded, the current consumer price index (CPI) is at 2.3%, above the Fed’s 2.0% inflation target.

Recovery Far from Certain

Inflation has grabbed most of the recent headlines, but the weak economy continues to be a concern.

The U.S. economy continues to sputter along without a true contraction, but gross domestic product (GDP) growth has been far from robust at just 0.9% for the first quarter. The subprime mortgage crisis that first began around this time last year with the implosion of two Bear Stearns Cos. Inc. (BSC) hedge funds (whose managers were recently indicted), continues to take a toll on both the financial and housing industries.

Separate government reports recently showed that housing starts hit a 17-year low while the producer price index (PPI) jumped 1.4% in May.

“We will not likely see the next action, rate hikes, until late in this year at the earliest,” Joel Naroff, president and chief economist at Naroff Economic Advisors, wrote in a note to clients. “The housing and industrial production data released [last week] do not tell us the economy has stabilized to the point where the Fed would have any cover to raise rates.”

And if a recent report from analysts at the Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC (ADR: RBS) is correct, an economic recovery remains in the distant future.

RBS analysts have warned clients to brace for a full-blown crash in the global stock-and-bond markets in the next three months, as the conflicting realities of slowing growth and rising inflation paralyze the world’s major central banks – causing “all the chickens [to] come home to roost,” Great Britain’s Daily Telegraph newspaper reported.

The predicted swoon would cause the U.S. Standard & Poor’s 500 Index – already down 16% from its trading high of 1,576.09 reached Oct. 11 – to nosedive all the way down to 1,050 by September. For the closely watched, broad-based U.S. stock index, that would represent an additional decline of 20% from Friday’s close of 1,317.93- and a total decline of 33% from its Oct. 11 apex.

At the same time, lending standards remain tight and many sectors of the credit market are nearly frozen, despite the aggressive rate-cutting campaign by the Fed that has brought the key interest rate down to 2.00% from its high of 5.25% last September.

The spread between the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) and the Fed Funds rate remains wide, as the three-month LIBOR was at 2.80% on Friday, according to MarketWatch data. Banks are still gun shy about lending, as major houses continue to take multi-billion dollar write-downs on mortgage-backed securities and other high-risk assets.

As long as the LIBOR rate is so much above Fed Funds, the U.S. central bank will unlikely tighten, William O’Donnell, U.S. government bond strategist at UBS Securities (UBS), told MarketWatch.

“There are still credit issues out there and LIBOR is an unsecured rate,” O’Donnell said. “Banks don’t want to lend to each other when it’s unsecured. Risks to growth are very high. Very clearly, the Fed is trapped in a vise.”

Source:  Fed Policymakers Look to Juggle Inflation, Stagnation

So it follows that as worldwide demand for electricity skyrockets – as it will – the shares of companies that provide these two key fuels also will take flight.

And they make for almost-perfect partners.

That’s because coal represents the world’s short-term solution to the problem of a rapidly climbing global demand for power. It’s plentiful, it’s cheaper than other available alternatives, and a big percentage of the world’s power plants are set up to burn this fossil fuel.

Uranium, on the other hand, represents the long-term solution to potential fuel shortages – and it offers a solution to global warming, to boot. Uranium-powered commercial nuclear plants are cheap to operate, can run a long time, and when operated correctly cause little pollution.

The New ‘Black Gold’

India, a growing economic and industrial power, relies on coal for nearly 70% of its total energy supply. And the World Coal Institute expects India’s energy consumption to rise by as much as 8% to 10% annually through 2020.

Coal also is used to satisfy the Red Dragon’s energy appetite, providing 78% of China’s total power needs. Coal demand in China jumped nearly 9% last year – meaning the Eastern power now accounts for a full quarter of the world’s annual coal consumption, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Five years ago, China exported 83 million metric tons more coal than it imported. But last year, the nation’s surplus dropped to a meager 2 million metric tons. That means more than 80 million metric tons of coal (about 12% of the internationally traded market) has been taken out of global circulation.

Vic Svec, a senior executive at Peabody Energy Corp. (BTU), the world’s largest private-sector coal producer, referred to China’s ability to influence the price of commodities as a “butterfly effect.” In other words, Svec told The Journal, “demand from Beijing can ripple back to Queensland, Australia, or Gillette, Wyoming.”

Svec’s right. China’s recent development is part of the reason the highly desirable low-sulfur coal from the coal-laden Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Montana has climbed from less than $10 a ton last year, to nearly $15 a ton – a price gain of 50%.

Central Appalachian coal, the benchmark grade widely used by power plants, jumped from $40 a ton in early 2007, to nearly $90 a ton now, according to a recent report by the Associated Press. That’s price increase of 125% in just a single year.

Meanwhile, the weekly index for power station coal prices at Australia’s Newcastle port, a benchmark for the Asian market, averaged $126.45 per metric ton in the month of April, up nearly 40% from January. The port’s weekly price index rose to $133.63 per metric ton for the week ended May 9 – an 11-week high according to the globalCOAL NEWC Index. The index is up approximately 49% this year.

According to the Energy Information Administration, world coal consumption could expand by 74% from 2004 to 2030. And that will only drive prices higher.

While demand for coal is at an all-time high, the same can’t be said for coal supplies. Harsh weather conditions and infrastructure constraints in coal-producing regions have severely crimped supplies.

In South Africa, power shortages and flooding have closed down several key mines. With such setbacks, the price of coal coming out of South Africa’s Richards Bay Coal Terminal, the world’s largest, jumped nearly 90% last year.

Xstrata PLC, the world’s biggest exporter of power-station coal, said that first-quarter coal output fell 3.6% after floods and rain delays diminished supplies from Australian mines. Monsoon rains throughout the region also impacted archrivals Rio Tinto PLC (RTP), and BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP).

Meanwhile, China, a leading producer and consumer, was devastated just a few months ago by the worst blizzard of the past half-century. Three weeks of snowfall killed at least 60 people and cost the country approximately $7.5 billion.

China had already closed a multitude of coalmines in 2007, after they were deemed unsafe. The subsequent weather problems only exacerbated that situation, forcing the closure of a great many more mines and prompting China to restrict exports. Major roads and railways also were shut down, creating traffic congestion during the thickly traveled Chinese New Year – and making deliveries highly problematic for drivers.

As the cold of winter gave way to the higher temperatures of spring and summer, yet another weather-related challenge emerged. This time around, the double-whammy of higher-than-expected temperatures coupled with sparse rainfall are straining thermal power plants: The warm weather is boosting the use of energy-intensive air conditioning even as those same higher temperatures have dropped the water level of the rivers that spin the huge power-producing turbines at hydroelectric dams.

If you’re looking to play surging coal prices, Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald suggests taking a look at Yanzhou Coal Mining Co. (YZC). The China-based Yanzhou is nicely diversified in several ways:

• First, it not only operates underground coalmines, Yanzhou also operates a railway transportation network for shipping coal.
• Second, Yanzhou’s focus on low-sulfur coal products means it finds demand from large-scale power plants and from metal-producing companies all around the world. The reason: Low-sulfur coal can be combined with coking coal in a metal-production process known as “pulverized coal injection,” or PCI. That combination gives Yanzhou a nice extra bit of industrial diversification.
• Third, investors can add geographic diversification to the profit mix as they analyze sector plays.

Provided with these positives, it should be no surprise to investors that Yanzhou’s first-quarter profit more than doubled, climbing more than 112% on surging demand for the fuel and on the higher trading prices seen in the markets around the world.