This time around, silver has failed to match the gains that gold posted in recent months, spawning a widespread believe that silver is poised for a bull run. Such factors as a decline in supply and a weakening U.S. dollar have buttressed that bullish belief. And so has the fact that China’s government is strongly encouraging that country’s residents to buy the white metal.

With Beijing’s plan to inject $587 billion (4 trillion yuan) into China’s economy, and a growing desire to diversify away from the U.S. dollar as its key reserve currency, the Asian giant could increase its reliance on such precious metals as gold and silver – especially if global inflation takes hold.

China’s central bank “could use gold, silver or even a basket of commodities” to diversify away from the dollar, said Money Morning Contributing Editor Peter Krauth, a recognized expert in metals, mining and energy stocks. “It’s impossible to know how they’d go about it.”

This wouldn’t be the first time that silver played an important economic and transactional role in Mainland China. Nearly 2,500 years ago, the Red Dragon was the first to use silver as money. While China invented paper money in the ninth century, silver made its way back several dynasties later as legal tender until the government again prohibited its ownership in 1935.

Now, 75 years later – in the wake of the worst economic downturn since World War II – China has reversed its stance on silver.

In July, state-run China Central Television (CCTV) began a campaign that pushes the purchase of silver bullion as investment opportunity. Analysts say silver has been undervalued in the last few years, and is a good investment for individual investors, according to CCTV.

“The investment threshold [for silver] is not high, and is more suitable for the general public,” said Want Chunli, GM of Beijing’s Caibai Shopping Mall, the first to offer silver as an investment opportunity. “Silver is much cheaper than gold.”

Silver’s investment potential is best measured by the silver-gold ratio, or the price of gold divided by the price of silver. Over the past five years, the ratio has held fairly steady, requiring 55 ounces of silver to buy an ounce of gold. Earlier this year, as gold increased at a faster rate than sliver, the ratio skyrocketed to 70 to 1. It has since corrected to around 60.

Money Morning’s Krauth says that when this relative price ratio does correct, it tends to overshoot.

“I see it going to 50 at least,” Krauth said. “With gold at $1,000, that means silver could trade to $20 or even higher, which is another 20% from [the current price].”

Silver closed Friday at $16.06, while gold closed at $991.10 – implying a silver-to-gold ratio of 61.71.

Krauth sees China returning to an asset-backed currency and says ownership of silver could help the average citizen, even if its central bank is unable to diversify out of the U.S. dollar fast enough.

The more Chinese citizens who own silver, “the stronger the country will be in the eventuality that the world establishes a new world reserve currency backed by (most likely) precious metal(s).”

China’s middle class is estimated at 300 million – roughly equal to the entire U.S. population. And that consumer group in China is growing. As those incomes continue to rise, so, too, will the demand for silver.

China’s use for silver goes beyond jewelry or as a safeguard against inflation. Thanks to the antibacterial properties of silver ions, the white metal is used for everything from socks to wash machines, to name a few.

Silver Supply is Falling

The world once had 2.2 billion ounces of silver above ground, but that figure has plummeted 86% to the current 300 million ounces, according to Addison Wiggin, a best-selling author and an executive publisher at Agora Financial LLC, which, like Money Morning, is part of the Agora Inc. group of companies.

However, above-ground silver accounts for only 25% of the silver produced today, says Money Morning’s Krauth. The other three-quarters is actually a byproduct of such mined base metals as iron, nickel or lead.

When the financial markets nearly collapsed last fall, base-metals producers weren’t spared. As demand forecasts were cut, they quickly throttled back on production, expansion and exploration.

“More has to come from mine production, which can only grow so fast,” Krauth said. “The fact that base-metals producers have cut back a lot hurts silver production because it’s a byproduct of base-metal mining.”

Once the recovery begins – and it’s already under way in China – supplies will be hard to come by as demand for base metals returns, resulting in higher prices for silver.

Gold’s “Lap Dog”

The price of gold doesn’t necessarily affect the price of silver, but when other economic factors such as the U.S. dollar falter, prices traditionally rise at the same pace. But when the global financial crisis took hold last year, the silver-to-gold ratio shot up to 84.

Much like a “nervous little lapdog,” the price of silver follows gold closely, Krauth says.

Since its mid-July low of $12.46 an ounce, silver has rebounded roughly 30% to current levels. But if gold supplies run short, silver may have even more room to run.

When gold hit its all-time high of $1,033.90 per ounce in March 2008, silver prices soared as high as $20.92. But when gold hit its 18-month high earlier this month, silver stayed in check.

“Silver has lagged the rise in gold prices since 2000,” said Money Morning Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson, a former investment banker with more than 25 years’ experience in the global financial markets. “If gold really takes off and the big money finds there isn’t enough of it, there should be spillover into silver.”

Famed commodities investor Jim Rogers also noted the lag in silver and gold’s prices.

“I’m looking at all commodities, but some commodity prices are very depressed,” Rogers told China International Business. “Silver is 70% or so below its historical highs, coffee is 70% or so, as is sugar, while gold is only 10% off its all time high.”

Making the Investment

While buying physical silver is an option for investors, the simplest way to get in, Krauth says, is via the iShares Silver Trust (NYSE: SLV) exchange-traded fund (ETF). In the three years since its inception, SLV has accumulated $3.91 billion in assets, and the share price – which is the equivalent to one ounce of silver – is up more than 50% this year.

During last fall’s market crash, SLV’s holdings remained nearly flat, around 220 million silver ounces. Since then, it has grown a further 22% to about 280 million ounces.

“That’s a testament to investor commitment,” Krauth said.

Hutchinson calls SLV “quite a good vehicle” over the big silver miners – such as Coeur d’Alene Mines Corp. (NYSE: CDE).

Coeur d’Alene has a large silver deposit in Bolivia. But Hutchinson characterizes Bolivia as a country that he “wouldn’t touch,” thanks chiefly to the Venezuela-like nationalization of the country’s other commodities, including oil and natural gas.

Source: The No. 1 Way to Profit When Silver Upstages Gold

It’s a world shrouded in deep myths and folklore that include stories of people losing their homes, or having 5,000 bushels of soybeans dumped on their front lawn.

I’m talking about the commodities world, of course.

But despite these tall tales, commodities aren’t necessarily dangerous investments. Not if you know what you’re doing and take adequate precautions. Rather, the “secret society” stuff comes from the belief that the sector is a murky one that many investors simply don’t understand. Just the mere sound of “commodity futures and futures options contracts” was enough to send people running for cover…

However, nothing could be further from the truth when dealing with commodities. And over the past few years, we’ve seen great changes in the financial world that have opened the doors to this “secret society.”

Step Out of Your Comfort Zone… Don’t Be Afraid of Futures & Futures Options

I’ll tell you what I’ve told my friends and acquaintances over the years: Don’t be scared of commodity futures and futures options, they’re essentially little different than stock and stock options. If you know how to trade stocks and stock options, then there’s no difference from futures and futures options.

For example, if you can buy and sell IBM (NYSE: IBM) shares and IBM options, then why can’t you buy and sell sugar futures and sugar options? There is no difference. As long as you have an idea of where an investment (be it IBM or sugar) might move to and its underlying fundamentals, then what is there to be scared about?

Here’s the problem as I see it (based on my 18 years of experience in the commodities sector): Most people just don’t know enough about the underlying fundamentals of commodities – how/why soybeans, cocoa, cotton, or live cattle trade in a certain way. The majority of people know stocks and that’s that. They don’t like change and are fearful to step out of their comfort zone.

But all commodities that are available to trade on various U.S. exchanges are highly regulated. They have strict rules, which are efficient and assure the integrity and safety of your capital.

So if you’re looking to add some great potential gains to your portfolio, then consider what commodities can do for you…

Four Commodities… Four Explosive Moves

Want some examples of how explosive the world of commodities can be? Just look at these moves for oil, natural gas, gold and silver over the past year…

How would you have liked to hop aboard some of those moves?

Oil: When it started rising in 2007 and topped in 2008, it encompassed a staggering $90,000 move if you’d held just one contract. And the freefall that ended last March brought in an unheard of $110,000 for anyone being bearish.

If you’d held 10 contracts during those moves, you could have seen gains of over $1 million! And that’s just one direction. Double it if you went both ways.

Natural Gas: The move up in the summer of 2007 to the top in 2008 encompassed an $85,000 move, while the drop back down to the lows hit just two weeks ago and saw an even larger haul of $110,000. And this was for holding just one measly little contract. Imagine if you had 100 contracts.

Gold: From the gold chart below, you can see the trend higher from 2002. But even if you got onboard as late as 2006, the move could still have netted you $45,000.

Silver: A bullish position taken in 2006 would have scored $60,000 on just one contract. And if you’d hopped on the bear train near the highs in the spring of 2008, you could have pocketed another $65,000 just six months later.

This is some serious money folks.

And the great thing about commodities is that it’s normal for them to cycle from highs to lows and then back again. This gives you opportunities to profit on the way up and the way down. Moreover, it’s in contrast to the stock market, where most moves are biased to the upside.

Now, if you want to profit today…

Three Reasons Why You Should Trade These Four ETFs

Due to the changes that have taken place in the commodities world, regular investors have a chance to take part in the sector without leaving the comfort of a stockbroker.

We’re talking about commodity-related exchange-traded-funds (ETFs), which mimic the moves of the underlying asset. So you can use them to play some of the most popular and active commodity markets.

For example, if you’d like to go for oil, natural gas, gold, and silver, consider these ETFs:

• Oil: United States Oil Fund (NYSE: USO)
• Natural Gas: United States Natural Gas Fund (NYSE: UNG)
• Gold: SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE: GLD)
• Silver: iShares Silver Trust (NYSE: SLV)

If you want to gain exposure to the often lucrative commodities world, here’s why you should trade these ETFs…

1. Simple: ETFs trade like stocks, so you can buy and sell them as you would with shares of any other company from a regular stock brokerage account. So you don’t even need to get involved with commodity brokers, futures, or futures options contracts.
2. Options: The ETFs also have options available, which offers you more leverage and can reduce your risk.
3. Liquidity: Because all four of these ETFs are the largest ones available for their respective commodities, there is enough volume to be able to get in and out quickly and safely.

Next time, I’ll show you one of my favorite ways to use an options strategy to execute a bullish commodity trade. But in the meantime, check out those ETFs above.

Good trading,

Lee Lowell

Source: Four Easy Ways to Trade the World’s Top Commodities

There is a buzz in the commodities markets this week. Just about anything that can be pulled from the ground is surging in value. Everything, that is, but natural gas.

Most notably, gold is just about ready to reach over the critical $1,000 level, proving that investors are looking for safety. Even without a hint of inflation, the precious metal has surged by over 5% so far this week.

The quick run means the world’s gold miners are surging in value. The more leverage packed into their balance sheets, the higher their prices are going to go.

So far, Yumana Gold (NYSE:AUY) is up by nearly 20% this week, while AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) is up by over 15%.

It is a similar situation for the silver industry. As investors search for tangible value, the silver industry is taking its investors on a wild ride.

One of the more popular ways of playing the trend, the iShares Silver Trust ETF (NYSE:SLV) was up by as much as 5%, taking the week’s gains into double-digit territory.

TFN Strategic Trader subscribers love the action. Our call options are worth 66% more this afternoon than they were this morning.

The juicy story

Now, I realize you come to TFN sight looking for more than the usual take on the day’s news. Fortunately, our friends over in Russia are creating more than enough action to feed our appetite for story material.

As if the government-centric action unfolding around the Chinese commodity market was not enough to prove my prediction and profit potential of the “Commodities Carry Trade,” the Russian government is stepping into the ring to create some action on its own.

Unable to secure a firm economic future through normal economic means, Putin is “calling” for the country’s banks to start buying Mechel’s (NYSE:MTL) debt. There are also rumors of strong tax breaks heading towards the large Russian miner.

Not only is this yet another wrinkle in my Commodity Carry Trade theory, it helps prove that the effort truly is becoming a global phenomenon.

With their economies weak and the world’s banking industry even weaker, governments are quickly turning to the commodities market for their financial security.

Why invest in paper backed by a desperate government when you can invest in a commodity the world will need no matter what happens in the coming years?

No questioning the profit potential

While there are lots of facets affecting this trade, one thing that is certain is it will be extremely bullish for the commodities market.

We are seeing a mere glimpse of things to come.

Once demand surpassed production… stand back. Prices will soar.

I have a fantastic way to take advantage of this situation, but I absolutely cannot give it away to a wide audience.

Its value was up by nearly 50% today with a trading volume of just 287 trades. Imagine what would happen if thousands of eager investors suddenly jumped in.

If you want me to email you with the trade to make, just click here.

Finally, just to prove there is an exception to every rule, natural gas prices are hitting yet another new low today, dropping the to a paltry $2.50 per million BTUs.

Could it be that foreign investors want nothing to do with an American-based economy? Or is the bearish action a result of the growing inventory glut across the globe?

Now that some of the world’s most powerful governments are getting in on the action, the commodity trade is not going anywhere anytime soon.

This is exciting stuff that is going to drastically change the commodities industry. The situation has profit opportunity written all over it.

I say we take advantage of it.

Source: Russia’s Maneuvering Boosts the Commodities Market

The positive link between gold and equities market has been on the rise, as the metal is used as a hedge against inflation and erosion of portfolio values.

“The markets today are focusing on China and the sharp break of the Shanghai equities index,” said Bill O’Neill, managing partner of New Jersey-based LOGIC Advisors.

“In recent weeks, we noted the weakness in the equities, of course, has had a positive relationship with commodities, and that continued to be a factor,” he said.

Global stocks fell on Monday, dragged by a six percent tumble in China, which sent nervous investors into the yen for safe haven. Wall Street was off about 1 percent in afternoon trade.

U.S. December gold futures settled down $5.30 at $953.50 an ounce on the COMEX division of the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Spot gold was at $951.70 an ounce at 2:03 p.m. EDT (1803 GMT), against $954.45 an ounce late in New York on Friday.

Weakness in oil prices, which fell over $3 to under $70 per barrel, and a sharp rise of the yen against the dollar amid risk aversion, are both weighing on gold.

Afshin Nabavi, head of trading at MKS Finance, said price volatility had also been exacerbated by holiday-thinned trade, with the London market closed for the bank holiday.

Gold typically trades in a close negative relationship with the dollar, as it is often bought as an alternative investment. Like all dollar-priced assets, it also becomes cheaper for holders of other currencies as the U.S. unit softens.

Meanwhile, a report that Chinese state-owned companies will be allowed to walk away from loss-making commodity derivative trades also struck a nerve among metals traders.

James Steel, chief commodities analyst at HSBC in New York, said that the news “played an element” in weighing down on gold.

JEWELRY DEMAND IN FOCUS

The precious metal is taking little direction from underlying demand or supply issues over the seasonally quiet summer period, analysts said.

Frank Holmes, chief executive of U.S. Global Investors, said that while gold has historically risen in the month of September on the back of strong global jewelry demand, it could be challenging this year due to the economic slowdown and the high price of bullion.

Texas-based U.S. Global manages over $2 billion in fund assets.

Silver, meanwhile, turned higher due to strong demand from Asia, analysts said. Silver, which is a largely industrial metal, has recently outperformed gold on the back of better economic sentiment.

Holdings of the world’s largest silver-backed ETF, the iShares Silver Trust , also fell almost 82.6 tonnes, or 1 percent, last week. Spot silver was at $14.87 an ounce against $14.74.

Platinum prices were a touch softer, pressured by a decline in prices of industrial commodities such as oil. Platinum was at $1,236 an ounce against $1,244, while palladium was at $289 against its previous finish of $287.

Close Change Pct 2008 YTD

Chg Close Pct Chg US gold 953.50 -5.30 -0.6 884.30 7.8 US silver 14.923 0.108 0.7 11.295 32.1 US platinum1244.00 -1.90 -0.2 941.50 32.1 US palladium 293.50 1.15 0.4 188.70 55.5 Prices at 2:01 p.m. EDT (1801 GMT) Gold 951.30 -3.15 -0.3 878.200 8.3 Silver 14.88 0.14 0.9 11.30 31.7 Platinum 1235.50 -8.50 -0.7 924.50 33.6 Palladium 290.00 3.00 1.0 184.50 57.2

Aug 31 (Reuters)

Oil prices continue to hover around $70 a barrel, and gold is in the mid-$900 range. Meanwhile the CRB Continuous Commodity Price Index has surged to a level 30% above its March low.

Finally, copper, supposedly a barometer of the global economy, went above $6,000 per metric ton – up more than 96% this year.

And while prices for most commodities are still well below last year’s peaks, the price spike is more dangerous than it looks.

Normally, commodities prices zoom at the top of a global inflationary boom, as in 1973, 1980, or last summer. This time, the surge is happening at the bottom of a recession. If it continues, the commodities price resurgence could cut off global recovery before it really gets going.

Commodities prices usually take off at the top of a normal business cycle, as inflation is accelerating. The price rise then causes commodity consumers to feel poorer. This reduces demand and brings on a recession. Then, new production capacity comes on stream after demand has fallen back, causing prices to remain depressed for several years.

That’s what happened in 1973, with the first Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) oil price rise, and again in 1980, with the second. After 1980, we didn’t see a real commodities price surge until the middle 2000s. That’s because the tech revolution caused consumer demand to move to things like computer chips that used fewer raw materials than traditional products.

Last summer, we had a similar price peak. Given the depth of the current recession, you’d expect commodities prices to stay low for several years, as new production capacity comes on stream. But that hasn’t happened. Instead, prices have rebounded sharply.

There are three possible reasons for this year’s surge.

First, it could be the result of very low interest rates and loose monetary policy. In that case, it will soon lead to a rise in general inflation.

It could also be due to the worldwide fiscal stimulus – in the United States, China, the United Kingdom, India and most other economies. Much of the stimulus - particularly in China – consists of infrastructure spending. Infrastructure development requires lots of steel, copper, cement and other commodities. If that’s the case, the resulting budget deficits are likely to cause bond market problems. That would restrict the supply of funding for capital investment and other private sector needs.

Finally, the surge in commodities prices could be due to continued rapid growth in India and China. The 2.4 billion citizens of those countries, as they get richer, are demanding more goods that require a lot of commodities to produce, like automobiles.

Thus, when India and China grow faster than the rich West, we can expect commodities demand to surge more than global gross domestic product (GDP). If this is the cause, rapid commodities demand will lead to a rise in general inflation and spot commodities prices that will accompany shortages and price spikes. That would have a deflationary effect on output.

We saw this effect in 2008’s third quarter, when real U.S. GDP dropped 2.7%. That drop must have been the effect of $147 oil in July, since the financial crisis did not hit home until the very end of that quarter.

It’s impossible to tell which of these three is really causing the current commodities price surge. We can, however, be sure that it will choke off global recovery if it carries on much longer.

That’s a miserable possibility, especially if it means we also get inflation and higher interest rates. However, as investors we can make some money from the commodities surge.

Here are some ideas:

Powershares DB Base Metals Fund (NYSE: DBB): This exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracks the Deutsche Bank AG (DB) base metals index, allowing you to invest directly in the price movements of non-precious metals. With a market capitalization of $308 million, it is reasonably liquid. Plus, a lot of money has been flowing into it recently.

Vale S.A. (NYSE ADR:VALE): Vale is the world’s largest iron ore producer and a key supplier to China’s exuberant infrastructure growth. Historical P/E of less than 10; will benefit hugely from price run-ups in steel.

iShares Silver Trust (NYSE: SLV): This ETF Invests directly in silver bullion, which has been left behind somewhat in its relationship to gold’s price rise and can be expected to move up as gold does, possibly by a much greater percentage.

Market vectors Gold Miners (NYSE: GDX): Gold miners benefit disproportionately from a rise in the gold price because their production costs are fixed. They are thus a more leveraged way to play it than the metal itself, particularly as surging speculative demand can increase mining companies’ price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios.

Four Ways to Profit From Resurgent Commodities Prices

In fact, when you peruse the news it’s difficult to come to any other conclusion. For instance:

• A number of key earnings reports have been much better than expected, and company executives buttressed those profit figures with positive comments about the next 18 months.
• The trading operations of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE:GS) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) both just reported record profits.
• U.S. housing prices rose in May for the first time in three years. Initial jobless claims have plunged 15% since their April peak. The Conference Board’s Index of Leading Economic Indicators rose 0.7% in June, its third successive positive reading.
• And just yesterday (Thursday), the Dow Jones Industrial Average topped the 9,200 mark for the first time since November – a potentially highly bullish development for the economy, since stock prices are forward-looking.

But while many experts will look at these developments as an excuse to celebrate the looming rebound to come, I actually see them as a real cause for concern. The reality is that these reports, when viewed in concert with other data, are actually a sign of a re-inflating financial bubble.

This is actually an “Economic Recovery Trap” that – when sprung – will inflict a lot of pain on overly optimistic investors. Now that we’re sufficiently forewarned, we should re-orient our money accordingly.

Doomed by Deficits

It’s not surprising that the U.S. economy has shown signs of strength in recent weeks; it has had huge amounts of money thrown at it.

On the fiscal side, the Obama administration’s May budget plan suggested deficit for the 2009 fiscal year (which ends in September) would reach $1.83 trillion – about 13% of gross domestic product (GDP).

However, subsequently released unemployment figures have shown that the U.S. jobless level reached 9.5% in June, far above the 8.3% rate assumed in the budget. And unemployment is expected to spike further in the second half of the year.

This worsening unemployment situation strongly suggests that the true budget-deficit figures will be even worse than those already announced, a supposition strengthened by the postponement – from mid-July to mid-August – of the normal mid-term budget review. Since U.S. President Barack Obama is currently attempting to steer two difficult and expensive pieces of legislation – the cap-and-trade energy bill and the healthcare-reform bill – through Congress, he does not want unfavorable budget numbers appearing that might be used to persuade wavering legislators to oppose them.

Even at 13% of GDP in fiscal 2009 and 10% of GDP in fiscal 2010, the U.S. federal deficit is far above any previous level reached in peacetime, so it’s likely that if the economy begins to recover these deficits will prove difficult to finance, meaning the budgetary shortfalls will push up long-term interest rates.

That escalation in long-term rates, in turn, could choke off the economic recovery, which to be healthy requires a rebuilding of inventories, extensions of credit to new domestic-and-foreign customers, and a revival of enthusiasm for such large-ticket items as housing and automobiles.

With the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries already up from a low of 2.07% in December to a recent level of 3.60%, the dampening effect of rising interest rates may already be becoming apparent. In any case, the deficit is a dark cloud that threatens to obscure the economic outlook.

And that dark deficit cloud will be very difficult to remove.

Know Your (Real) Enemy

The other main problem with today’s economy is the likely resurgence of inflation. Even the U.S. Federal Reserve – which under central bank Chairman Ben S. Bernanke for a long time apparently maintained a fear of deflation above all else – admitted in its last meeting that the likelihood of deflation had receded.

That’s not surprising: In the last six months, core consumer price inflation (excluding food and energy) was a reported 2.4% annually. Although the “headline figure” has been low because of the sharp drop in energy prices the United States economy has experienced since last year, that effect is about to disappear, as energy prices peaked in early July 2008 and fell sharply throughout the fall. Thus, even reported consumer price inflation – on a year-over-year basis – is likely to surge in the months after this one (July).

Moreover, the reported inflation figure may be low. Each month, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics “seasonally adjusts” consumer price statistics to remove normal seasonal patterns from the data. That seasonal adjustment process is thoroughly opaque, and is subject to manipulation. In the early months of 2008, for example, when reported inflation was high, the downward seasonal adjustments were consistently much larger than the average of the decade 1998-2007. The process was then reversed late in the year, when reported inflation was negative, but the upward seasonal adjustments made it less negative. For the year as a whole, “seasonally adjusted” inflation was 0.5% below unadjusted inflation, which shouldn’t happen, except by bizarre rounding effects.

In the first six months of 2009, the negative seasonal adjustments have re-appeared, to the extent that total seasonal adjustments for the six months were minus 1.2%, compared with a 1998-2007 average of minus 0.61%. If the seasonal adjustments are indeed wrong, and should have been at only the average level, then “core” price inflation in the six months to June would have been 3.6% annually.

Not only is that not deflation; it suggests accelerating inflation.

Money Supply Moves

Another reason I wouldn’t be surprised by a reappearance of rapid inflation is the big increases in the money supply we’ve seen over the last year.

According to St. Louis Fed data, the M2 money supply has increased by 8.8% in the last year. The St. Louis Fed’s own Money of Zero Maturity (MZM) – the best measure of the broad U.S. money supply available since the central bank ceased reporting M3 in 2006 – jumped 10.2%. And the overall monetary base zoomed an astounding 92.8%.

In addition, the Federal Reserve has bought $300 billion of government bonds, always an inflationary warning signal since it monetizes the deficit. Furthermore, the Fed and the government together have engaged in rescue, stimulus and guarantee programs totaling an astounding $23.7 trillion, according to Neil Barofsky, inspector general for the government’s Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP). A “gross” number if ever there was one, that figure is nearly twice overall U.S. GDP.

Let’s face reality: We’re going to be paying this bill for decades to come – almost certainly largely through resurgent inflation. In those circumstances, the recovery in the stock market is based not on reality, but simply on a bubble – an assertion that’s already been vindicated by the extraordinary afore-mentioned profitability of the Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase trading operations, which typically benefit enormously when bubbles are inflating and there is too much money sloshing about.

The near-bankruptcy of CIT Group Inc. (NYSE: CIT), and the losses recorded by the commercial banking sides of Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) and Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC), demonstrate that even in a period when short-term rates are exceptionally low, conventional commercial banking is not currently a moneymaker.

Other then Goldman Sachs shares (whose prosperity is likely to be short-lived), it is clear that our investment dollars should be concentrated in two areas:

• Conservatively run overseas economies.
• And inflationary hedges such as gold and silver.

Let’s look at some investment opportunities in each category.

First, we should buy moderately priced shares in countries where “stimulus” has been limited and in which monetary and fiscal policies are close to balance. The two largest such countries are Germany and Brazil, so you should look at the Germany ETF iShares MSCI Germany Index (NYSE: EWG) and the Brazilian iShares MSCI Brazil Index (NYSE: EWZ).

Second, you should make sure that a substantial portion of your assets are in inflation hedges such as gold and silver, either in the metals directly through SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE: GLD) and iShares Silver Trust (NYSE: SLV) or through gold mining shares, the exchange-traded fund (ETF) for which is the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSE: GDX).

Source: Beware of the Obama Stimulus Trap

Speaking of open interest numbers, gold o.i. on Thursday fell 3,216 contracts to 391,144…on absolutely monstrous volume of 174,662 contracts. Silver’s decline was much more modest…only 93 contracts to 96,309…on total volume of 18,664 contracts.

The Commitment of Traders report issued yesterday, was as expected. In silver, the bullion banks decreased their net short position by 1,522 contracts. This doesn’t seem like a very big number, but it’s impressive because o.i. fell in the face of a silver price that rose quite a bit during the reporting week. The full color COT report is linked here.

Gold o.i. was exactly as expected…with the bullion banks going short against every long…effectively stopping the gold rally in its tracks. The bullion banks increased their net short position by a staggering [but not surprising] 21,939 contracts. The bullion banks are now net short 204,226 contracts…20.4 million ounces. The full-color COT graph for gold is linked here.

We are now sitting with a COT structure that is bullish to very bullish for silver…and very bearish for gold. This situation has only existed a few times during the last ten years. Ted suggested [and not for the first time] that maybe ‘da boyz’ are trying to permanently separate silver and gold prices so that silver will rise independently of gold. That’s possible…but we’ll have to wait and see if it pans out that way.

The Comex Delivery Report for Friday showed that only 55 gold contracts were delivered…and nothing at all in silver. There were no changes in the alleged holdings of either GLD or SLV. The U.S. Mint has updated their production numbers in silver eagles again. This time they showed that another 275,000 silver eagles were minted…bringing the monthly total up to 2,300,000. Nothing was added for gold eagles. And the Comex-approved warehouses reported that 320,392 ounces of silver were withdrawn from their collective inventories.

The usual N.Y. gold commentator mentioned that The Gartman Letter’s buy stop at $955 was not triggered yesterday because gold did not, in fact, trade long enough above that price to trigger its buy. He also had this…”There is a good deal of commotion today regarding forecasts that China will pass India in gold consumption in some five years. It is odd that so many observers extrapolate about the intensely volatile Indian gold market based on a few months recent history. At the time of the enormous imports last summer, the talk might well have been of India monopolizing the world gold stock! In any case, China’s gold production, bolstered by subsidized fuel and the hugely undervalued Yuan apparently supplies almost all local demand (India mines almost no gold). How seriously can one take the Shanghai Gold Exchange, which today reports that the gold contract is backed by only 156 kilos of metal? The Bloomberg story is headlined “China May Overtake India in Gold Demand, Council Says”..and the link is here.”

The other day, several companies [i.e. Ford (NYSE:F), eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) and AT&T (NYSE:T)] reported better than expected earnings and as a result, the stock market rallied on the news. While some companies have reported better than expected earnings for Q2/2009, others have struggled. Today’s chart provides some perspective on the current earnings environment by focusing on 12-month, as reported, S&P 500 earnings. You can see how earnings are expected [38% of S&P 500 companies have reported for Q2/2009] to have declined over 98% since peaking in Q3/2007, making this by far the largest decline on record…and the data goes back to 1936. I thank P.S. for providing this data…which is all [including the chart] courtesy of www.chartoftheday.com …the link to the website is here.

Besides the Bloomberg story embedded in the usual N.Y. gold commentator’s paragraph above, I have three other stories for your reading pleasure this weekend. The first is from yesterday’s edition of The Economist out of London. It bears the headline “Here today, gone by 2010: Russia reserve fund is emptying fast.” The story is certainly worth the read…and I thank P.S. for sending it along. The link is here.

The next story is from the hallowed halls of the The New York Times. It’s a story about high-frequency trading—which has become one of the most talked-about and mysterious forces in the markets. Casey Research’s own Bud Conrad was circulating this story around the company yesterday…and I thought it worthy of your time. It’s entitled “Stock Traders Find Speed Pays, in Milliseconds”…and the link is here.

The last story today is from commodityonline.com…and filed from Johannesburg. The title pretty much says it all…”New law boosts gold bar sale in South Africa.” Until I read this story, I wasn’t aware that South Africans were not allowed to own gold in bar form. You learn something new every day. The link is here.

Throughout all my years of investing, I’ve found that the big money was never made in the buying or the selling…the big money was made in the waiting. – Jesse Livermore

Today’s ‘blast from the past’ goes back to 1972. I believe that this was their biggest, if not their only, hit. But what a hit it was. Turn up your speakers and then click here.

Something appears to be up in the gold and silver market…which the latest COT confirms. Further rallies in gold never amount to much when the bullion banks are short this amount of gold. Sure, I’ve seen their short position as high as 26 million ounces…which is 55,000 contracts higher than we are today…so I guess we can go higher, but the odds are not in our favor. How high we go from here [if we do go higher] depends entirely on whether the bullion banks are prepared to take on an even larger short position. But once that high [whatever, and whenever it is] is in, there is only one direction gold can go…down. Will silver go with it? Don’t know, but Ted Butler says that they would have to get the price below its latest low, which is around $12.40…about $1.50 below where it closed yesterday…before there would be any more significant long liquidation by the tech funds and the small traders. The 200-day moving average is at $12.29. Ted doesn’t think they can do it. We’ll see.

I note in closing that this is the last edition of Casey’s Daily Resource Plus. I hope that you have found it to be both educational and entertaining. Many parts of it will be shuffled off into other reports…and as most of you already know, I’ve been fortunate enough to be given my own daily stand-alone column. That honor is entirely because of you, dear reader…and for that, I’m grateful, appreciative…and thankful.

Enjoy the rest of your weekend and I’ll see you next week with a brand new look…which I look forward to seeing for the first time myself…as I haven’t seen it yet either.

Source: And Then There’s This…Monday, July 27, 2009

Wednesday’s open interest in gold showed an increase of 3,421 contracts to 394,360…on big volume of 120,609 contracts. Silver o.i went the other way…down 1,867 contracts to 96,402…on decent volume of 22,687. Ted said that most of the decline in silver came from far-dated spreads being lifted. I was surprised that silver o.i. fell at all, considering the fact that silver rallied 30 cents in New York trading…at the same time that gold rose nine dollars…as did its open interest. Another unsolved mystery in the dichotomy that exists in the o.i. between these two metals. Since this occurred on Wednesday, one day after the Commitment of Traders cut-off, we won’t see the actual results of this until the COT on July 31st.

Speaking about the COT…the latest one comes out at 3:30 Eastern time this afternoon. Ted and I figure that the net short position in gold has deteriorated at least 20,000 contracts since the last report…and that the bullion banks are now short over 20 million ounces…again. And don’t forget that of that 20 million ounces, pretty close to 14 million ounces of that short position is held by ‘3 or less’ U.S. bullion banks.

The Comex Delivery Report showed that 66 gold and 38 silver contracts were delivered yesterday. There were no changes in the alleged gold holdings of either GLD or SLV either. There were no changes in production over at the U.S. Mint…and the Comex-approved warehouses showed a small decline in silver inventories of 117,180 ounces troy.

Before continuing further, I’d like to explain what I mean by “alleged” when I refer to the gold holdings of either the GLD or SLV. I know I’ve explained it before, but an e-mail that I received yesterday via Ted Butler suggests that I should do it again. Yes, I’m confident that there is gold and silver in these ETFs…but not all that they say they have. The individual prospectus on each of these ETFs is so full of holes, you could drive a Mack truck through most of them. There are no public audits, so there is no way of knowing whether all the metal they say they have, is actually there. The custodians for each do not lend confidence either. The two U.S. bullion banks with the biggest derivatives positions in the precious metals market…JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM) and HSBC USA (NYSE:HBC)…are the custodians of the silver and gold ETFs respectively. Both Ted Butler and I agree that JPMorgan is by far the biggest silver short…if not the only silver short…amongst all the U.S. bullion banks. You’ll excuse me [and the rest of the GATA crowd] if we think something stinks here.

This is one of the few areas that Ted and I totally disagree on. Our conversations turn ugly whenever this subject comes up…and he calls me a lot of terrible names at times. He thinks that it would be pure fraud if the ETFs did not have all precious metals they said they did. True…but how is one to find out? And I trust these two bullion banks just about as far as I can throw them. How about you?

The ETFs are fine for speculating on the price…but to say you own gold when you own one of these [or other] ETFs is pure fiction. The ETFs short their own shares whenever they don’t have the metal to back up demand. Ted and I agree that JPMorgan will rig a sell-off just so that it can buy back the shares they shorted and not have to physically deliver the metal to the SLV.

If you really want to make sure that whatever investment vehicle you buy in the precious metals arena has the physical to back it up, you have several choices…and here are a few of them…the first of which is Central Fund of Canada, James Turk’s GoldMoney, Bullion Management Group, Central Gold Trust (AMEX:GTU)…and soon CEF will have their Silver Trust up and running. I’d bet my life savings on the fact that these firms have the metal to back up their funds that they say they do. All you have to do is phone their auditors and ask. And I’m also fortunate enough to know the principals of all these firms…most of them personally.

But before you invest a dime in any of them, just make sure that your own personal stockpile of gold and silver [in your physical possession] is big enough, before you buy any fund…even GLD and SLV if you must. I don’t…and won’t…own either.

The usual N.Y. gold commentator also had this to say as well…”Amongst today’s buyers was apparently The Gartman Letter which cut its buy stop to $955/1 hour this morning. This will distress many of gold’s friends. [Yes, it does...but as I said earlier this week, I'm praying fervently that he is correct this time. - Ed] While TGL’s initial entry points for gold have a reasonable record, the history of its attempt to double up on breakouts is alarming. Perhaps TGL gets into the wrong hands! With the physical market faltering and Comex open interest and volume getting to levels seen at the late May/early June peak, this move has entered a risky phase.” [It has indeed!!! - Ed]

One of things that has gold where it is…and the bullion banks pulling out all the stops to prevent its rise…is the sheer amount of paper that the U.S. Treasury has monetized…or is about to sell. It is money printing on a scale not seen since Weimar Germany after WWI.

I note in Gregory T. Weldon’s latest edition of Weldon’s Money Monitor that he had this to say…”The most recent data reveals a HUGE single-week [sixth largest EVER] of debt monetization by the Fed, to the tune of $36.9 billion or, at an annualized pace, that would see the Fed monetize TWO Trillion Dollars worth of debt in a 12-month period.”

“Moreover, purchases were broad-based, providing the market with a GRAND-SLAM, covering all ‘four bases’ … with monetization of Treasury debt ($8.67 billion), Mortgage-Backed debt ($26.6 billion), Agency debt ($1.7 billion) and Term-Asset-Backed debt ($1.4 billion).”

And I see that Karl Denninger has gone apoplectic on this issue. Starting today, and ending next Thursday, there are $235 billion dollars in U.S. Treasuries being auctioned…almost a quarter of a Trillion dollars!!! Yep, you read that right! The article, courtesy of Craig McCarty, is entitled “Holy !@#!! Treasury Auction Schedule” and the link is here. There was a story about this in Bloomberg yesterday as well.

There should be a great smoking hole where the U.S. dollar used to be…along with a big four-digit gold price and three-digit silver price on such news…but we all know why there isn’t.

Besides the Denniger piece above, I have two other today. The first I found while I was reading Bill Murphy’s MIDAS commentary over at lemetropolecafe.com. It’s posted at the Ottawa Citizen…and is a reprint from The Financial Post. The story is headlined “On the road to higher gold prices: ‘Barometer of investor anxiety’”…and the link is here.

And lastly is this article in the Financial Times of London…written by Eckart Woertz, who is the Program Manager in Economics at the Gulf Research Centre in Dubai. Amongst other things, he recommends that…”they should engage in cautious currency diversification with gold being the ultimate dollar hedge.” The link is here.

The stock market is no longer the sum product of informed, or Captains of Industry, action. It is a rigged casino and asset bubble that is used to paper over declining US living standards. – Bill King, the King Report…23 July 2009

I’m still on the fence…but every reason why the price of gold and silver should explode…or why the price should be crushed…is on display in this commentary. Rampant money printing…and a large [and growing] gold short position that is well into the danger zone. But can they…or will they? The third possibility is that the bullion banks could get totally over run. I’m not optimistic about this scenario…but like I said before, if it does happen, the party’s at Ted Butler’s place!

All of us at Casey’s Daily Resource Plus hope you have a great weekend and I’ll see you on Saturday morning.

Source: And Then There’s This…Friday, July 24th, 2009

For the first time in quite a while, there were no deliveries in either gold or silver on the Comex Delivery Report. There were no changes [as usual] in the alleged holdings of the SLV ETF…but GLD showed a drop of 186,507 ounces yesterday. The U.S. Mint has another update for us…they increased their gold eagles by another 4,000 and their silver eagles by 150,000…bringing their monthly totals so far to 60,000 and 2,025,000 respectively. And lastly, there were no material changes in silver inventories over at the Comex-approved warehouses.

The only gold story of interest that I could find was over at mineweb.com where the headline read “Saudi retail gold sales plunge: Higher prices and fewer visitors force sales down 30%”…and the link is here. On top of that, the usual New York gold commentator mentioned in his commentary that neither India or Vietnam were importing gold yesterday.

In other news, I note in a Bloomberg story headlined “Credit Card Charge-offs rise again in June”. As a matter of fact, they rose to a record high. The Moody’s credit card charge-off index — which measures credit card loans that banks do not expect to be repaid — rose to 10.76% in June from 10.62% in May. Moody’s also mentioned that charge-offs should peak at 12-13% in mid-2010.” [I wouldn't bet any money on that. It sounds like another case of whistling past the graveyard to me. - Ed]

Not a lot of interesting stories…as it was a ho-hum kind of day everywhere yesterday. The first one is an item that I lifted from Bill Murphy’s MIDAS commentary over at lemetropolecafe.com. It’s a story from the BBC in London. The headline reads “U.K. Debt Hits a Record of £799 billion” One wonders how much hacking, slashing and outright cooking of the financial books it took to get that number below £800 billion? The link is here.

The next story is from Bloomberg. The opening paragraph reads…”The Federal Reserve is “embroiled” in politics and has “stretched beyond reason” its authority to make loans, said William Poole, who served as president of the St. Louis Fed from 1998 to 2008.” The ‘long knives’ are out for the Fed…even from their own people. The short article is well worth the read…and the link is here.

Normally, press releases from the CFTC would not show up in my column, but this one is different. The headline reads…”CFTC to Hold Three Open Hearings to Discuss Energy Position Limits and Hedge Exemptions: First Hearing Scheduled for July 28, 2009″. Ted Butler sent it to me early yesterday morning. He pointed out the fact that one paragraph was all in bold type. Now why on earth would a government press release do that? It stands out like the proverbial sore thumb. Maybe its because the boys over at JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) [and the other silver shorts] can only read large print. But it sure looks like a warning to me. Ted went on to say that the 8-point list below that describes to a ‘T’ what has to be done in the silver market to bring it back into line with every other traded commodity on the planet. Or, it could mean nothing. You be the judge…and the link is here.

While the crash only took place six months ago, I am convinced we have now passed through the worst — and with continued unity of effort, we shall rapidly recover. There has been no significant bank or industrial failure. That danger, too, is safely behind us. – Herbert Hoover, President of the United States…May 1, 1930

To make up for the lack of anything of much interest yesterday…here’s a video I ran at least 18 months ago. I’ve picked up a lot of new readers since then, so I thought I’d run it up the flagpole one more time. It’s not a music video, but turn up your speakers anyway, and then click here. Enjoy!

I’m still sitting on the precious metals fence…waiting to see which way the gold [and silver] price is going to go…but ready to jump into either the bull or bear camp, depending on the outcome. And as I’ve mentioned several times over the last week or so…I’ve got the perfect explanation as to why the price is going up or down…and by now, dear reader, you should have figured that out too.

Enjoy the rest of your day, and I’ll see you here on Friday.

Source: And Then There’s This…Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

This phenomenon will push price inflation much higher, giving you an opportunity to profit on the “reflation trade” that will play out over the next decade.