<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; SPSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/spss/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why the Obama Stimulus Has Us on a Collision Course with Inflation</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-the-obama-stimulus-has-us-on-a-collision-course-with-inflation/19621</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-the-obama-stimulus-has-us-on-a-collision-course-with-inflation/19621#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobless Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YHOO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Has the massive Obama stimulus plan put us on a collision course with virulent inflation? It sure looks that way. Let me explain …</p>
<p>When the U.S. Commerce Department on Friday said the U.S. economy contracted at a 1% annual pace in the second quarter, the report was actually seen as good news: It was a slower decline than in each of the two prior quarters, and economists had expected a contraction of 1.5%.</p>
<p>“This is good news,” Nariman Behravesh, an economist with <strong>IHS Global Insight Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AIHS" target="_blank">IHS</a>), told <em>The San Francisco Chronicle</em>.</strong></p>
<p>But here’s the wild card: Although government spending did increase during the April-to-June quarter, only about 7.7% – $60.4 billion – of U.S. President <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/president_obama/" target="_blank">Barack Obama</a>’s stimulus package had actually made its way into the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has the massive Obama stimulus plan put us on a collision course with virulent inflation? It sure looks that way. Let me explain …<span id="more-19621"></span></p>
<p>When the U.S. Commerce Department on Friday said the U.S. economy contracted at a 1% annual pace in the second quarter, the report was actually seen as good news: It was a slower decline than in each of the two prior quarters, and economists had expected a contraction of 1.5%.</p>
<p>“This is good news,” Nariman Behravesh, an economist with <strong>IHS Global Insight Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AIHS" target="_blank">IHS</a>), told <em>The San Francisco Chronicle</em>.</strong></p>
<p>But here’s the wild card: Although government spending did increase during the April-to-June quarter, only about 7.7% – $60.4 billion – of U.S. President <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/president_obama/" target="_blank">Barack Obama</a>’s stimulus package had actually made its way into the U.S. economy by June 30, the quarter’s official conclusion. Of that total, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/31/news/economy/stimulus_GDP/?postversion=2009073115" target="_blank">the largest component went to U.S. states</a> to help defray the jump in Medicaid costs, <strong><em>CNNMoney.com </em></strong>reported.</p>
<p>Much of the $43 billion in stimulus tax relief – including the “<a href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204447,00.html" target="_blank">Making Work Pay</a>” tax credit for individual workers – also took effect during the second quarter, <strong><em>CNNMoney </em></strong>said.<strong></strong></p>
<p>At this point, it’s really difficult to “see how the effect of stimulus has been very large,” Edward Lazear, an economics professor at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business – who served as an advisor to former U.S. President <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/georgewbush/" target="_blank">George W. Bush</a> – told <strong><em>CNN</em></strong>. “Very little has gone out.”<br />
And that’s the problem.</p>
<p>In short, it looks like we’re already experiencing an economic rebound – without the Obama stimulus having really even kicked in … yet. In fact, the impatience over the continued U.S. malaise, the slowness of the economic turnaround and the fact that when growth does return we’re almost assured of a “<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/jobless-recovery/" target="_blank">jobless recovery</a>” actually has some Washington legislators already pushing for a <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/07/second-stimulus/" target="_blank">second stimulus</a>.</p>
<p>That means the economy will be in rebound mode when nearly three-quarters of a trillion dollars in stimulus money starts to flow in. Dumping all that money into an already-growing economy won’t just serve as a simple tailwind that gives the economy a gentle push; it will be more like the head-snapping start followed by the thunderous charge down the quarter mile that we see from one of the supercharged Top Fuel Funny Cars driven by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hot_Rod_Association" target="_blank">National Hot Rod Association</a> (NHRA) star <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Force" target="_blank">John Force</a>. (From a standing start, Top Fuel Funny Cars cover a quarter mile in less than five seconds at speeds well in excess of 325 miles per hour).</p>
<p>And there’s only one outcome from that scenario – rampant inflation. In fact, U.S. consumers are probably headed for <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/31/obama-stimulus-trap/" target="_blank">the worst bout of inflation</a>since the 1980s. And that makes the so-called “<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/24/bernankes-exit-strategy/" target="_blank">exit strategy</a>” of U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke all the more important.<br />
To be sure, the Obama stimulus has given the economy a bit of a boost. So far:</p>
<ul>
<li>The states have deployed what stimulus money they have received, which helped fuel the biggest surge in state and local spending since 2007.</li>
<li>Some early pieces of the stimulus – such as the $25 increase in unemployment benefits – have allowed consumers to spend more.</li>
<li>And one economist – Economic Policy Institute’s Josh Bivens – said Obama stimulus money may have boosted growth by as much as three percentage points during the second quarter.</li>
</ul>
<p>But other economists say that – given the environment – the second-quarter GDP numbers were much too strong. After all, business spending dropped 8.9% and hours worked fell 7%. Somehow that doesn’t translate into a mere 1% drop in GDP. That latter figure will most certainly be revised downward in the future.</p>
<p>Unless or until that happens, look for the third quarter GDP statistics to give us a better picture of the U.S. economy’s health. Complaints that the promised stimulus money isn’t getting where it needs to be have Obama’s economic team working overtime to iron out the problems that keep cropping up.</p>
<p>Mark Thoma, an economics professor at the University of Oregon, told<strong><em>CNNMoney</em></strong> that “the third quarter will be a critical time period for assessing the stimulus package.”</p>
<p>And for assessing the inflation threat – which <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a></em></strong> has repeatedly warned is a very real threat. Gold, commodities, and other hard assets will be key holdings. The same is true for dividend-paying stocks. And make sure to go global – the best growth prospects will continue to be overseas.</p>
<h4>Market Matters</h4>
<p>A report by the New York Attorney General’s Office claims the initial nine institutions that received Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) money paid out $33 billion in bonuses in 2008.  Of particular note, <strong>Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=c" target="_blank">C</a>)</strong> and <strong>Bank of America (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong> rewarded a combined 900 employees (combined) with bonuses of at least $1 million, despite having received $45 billion each in government aid (and that doesn’t count the $3.6 billion <strong>Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. Inc.</strong> employees received).  Imagine how much they would have made if the companies were actually doing well?</p>
<p>While President Obama continued his road trip across America to promote health care reform, a group of conservative Democrats (Blue Dogs) came up with their version of a bill, but offered no timetable for completion.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, regulators pushed forward with proposed rules aimed at reducing speculation in the marketplace and focused on so-called “naked” short selling and on lpacing strict limits on commodities contracts.</p>
<p>In corporate news, deals were the theme of the week.  <strong>Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=msft" target="_blank">MSFT</a>)</strong> made amends with <strong>Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=YHOO" target="_blank">YHOO</a>)</strong> and forged a 10-year partnership to cut into <strong>Google Inc.’s (Nasdaq:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=goog" target="_blank">GOOG</a>)</strong> share of the Internet search business. And <strong>International Business Machines Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ibm" target="_blank">IBM</a>)</strong> is expanding its software empire with the purchase of <strong>SPSS Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=spss" target="_blank">SPSS</a>)</strong> for $1.2 billion.</p>
<p>On the earnings front, energy companies highlighted the week’s reports and the results were not pretty (though were expected).  On a positive note, <strong>Motorola Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=mot" target="_blank">MOT</a>)</strong> surprised analysts by reporting an unexpected profit, while offering a promising outlook, and <strong>Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=db" target="_blank">DB</a>)</strong> continued the favorable trend among (previously depressed) financials by posting strong earnings on solid investment banking operations.</p>
<p>Investors digested the mixed earnings news and chose to focus more on the positives.  Despite a temporary setback in China (5% index decline before encouraging comments by its central bank), the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> moved higher late in the week after <strong>General Electric Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ge" target="_blank">GE</a>)</strong> was upgraded to a “Buy” by a major analyst, a sign of an improving climate.  The <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq Composite Index</a></strong> even flirted with 2,000 for the first time since October 2008, and the<strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500 Index</a></strong> edged closer to 1,000, a level not seen since last November.</p>
<p>The Dow ended July with its best monthly performance since October 2002.  Japanese stocks moved to their highest levels in about 10 months and European equities soared to nine-month highs.  Bond investors breathed sighs of relief as a record $115 billion Treasury auctions came to a close and foreign bankers emerged as buyers on the final day.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="432" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Market/ Index</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Year Close (2008)</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Qtr Close (06/30/09)</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Previous Week<br />
(07/24/09)</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Current Week<br />
(07/31/09)</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">YTD Change</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">8,776.39</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">8,447.00</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">9,093.24</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">9,171.61</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+4.50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,577.03</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,835.04</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,965.96</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,978.50</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+25.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">903.25</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">919.32</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">979.26</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">987.48</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+9.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">499.45</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">508.28</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">548.46</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">556.71</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+11.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1526.21</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,629.31</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,747.64</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,773.69</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+16.22%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">0.25%</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">0.25%</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">0.25%</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">0.25%</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">0 bps</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">2.24%</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">3.52%</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">3.67%</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">3.50%</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+126 bps</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>Economically Speaking</h4>
<p>Has Fed Chairman Bernanke suddenly become Mr. Optimist these days? Early in the week, he proclaimed that the financial debacle ultimately would produce favorable results as “<em>not only will we will be back on track, but the economy will be stronger than it had been before this started</em>.”  He also urged Congress to move forward with a regulatory reform package to ensure that such dire times will not be repeated.</p>
<p>The Fed’s Beige Book showed that the economy remained weak, though signs of stabilization and improvements in manufacturing, housing, and even labor are occurring across several regions of the country.  Some districts reported enhanced corporate hiring, particularly within the healthcare and technology sectors.</p>
<p>The afore-mentioned second-quarter GDP report was better than expected, giving yet another indication that the recession is drawing closer to an end.</p>
<p>Still, it’s a much deeper recession than most realized: For the first time since records have been kept (1947), economic activity has declined for four consecutive quarters.  New homes sales skyrocketed in June by 11%, the fourth increase in the last six months, and home prices even climbed on a month-over-month basis for the first time since July 2006 according to the S&amp;P Case-Shiller index.</p>
<p>Durable good orders fell in June, though once the volatile transportation category was removed from the statistic, orders actually increased.  Consumer confidence fell in June, as ongoing pressures on the labor markets brought continued concerns and many Americans are refraining from major purchases (now and for the foreseeable future).</p>
<p>On the other hand, jobless claims rose in the most recent week, though analysts pointed to discrepancies from the auto industry.   Looking at the four-week moving average as a better gauge, claims for unemployment benefits actually fell to the lowest level since January and continuous claims unexpectedly declined, as well.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong><strong></strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="350" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Date</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Release</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Comments</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 27</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">New Home Sales (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Highest level of sales since November 2008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 28</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Confidence (07/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">2nd consecutive monthly decline</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 29</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Durable Goods Orders (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Decline due to cutbacks in volatile aircraft orders</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed’s Beige Book</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Weak economy, though signs of stabilization</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 30</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (07/25)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">4 week average, best since January</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 31</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">GDP (2nd Qtr)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Contracted, but at a slower than expected pace</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">The Week Ahead</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 3</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Construction Spending (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM – Manu (07/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 4</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Personal Income/Spending (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 5</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Factory Orders (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM – Services (07/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 6</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (08/01)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 7</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Unemployment Rate (07/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Non-farm Payroll (07/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Credit (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/03/obama-stimulus-inflation/">Why the Obama Stimulus Has Us on a Collision Course with Inflation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-the-obama-stimulus-has-us-on-a-collision-course-with-inflation/19621/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment News Briefs Wednesday, July 29, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-wednesday-july-29-2009/19518</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-wednesday-july-29-2009/19518#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Money Morning Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subprime Mortgage Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Goldman Goes to Defends Energy Trading; Consumer Confidence Falls on Job Worries; Home Price Erosion Continues to Slow; Congress Works to Ban Incentive Pay, Give Shareholders a Voice on Bonuses; IBM Expands Its Data-Crunching Business;</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGS" target="_blank">GS</a>) representatives are yesterday (Tuesday) defended their commodities trading business on Capitol Hill, where regulators may set limits on speculators in the sector. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said that the energy trading community may have played a major role in the volatility of energy prices over the last few years, and may need to expand its oversight of the practice. “<a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/28/energy-trading-in-focus-on-capitol-hill/" target="_blank">The American people are tired of excessive speculation and bubble economies caused by Wall Street greed</a>,&#8221; Senator Bernard Sanders, an&#8230;</li></ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goldman Goes to Defends Energy Trading; Consumer Confidence Falls on Job Worries; Home Price Erosion Continues to Slow; Congress Works to Ban Incentive Pay, Give Shareholders a Voice on Bonuses; IBM Expands Its Data-Crunching Business;<span id="more-19518"></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGS" target="_blank">GS</a>) representatives are yesterday (Tuesday) defended their commodities trading business on Capitol Hill, where regulators may set limits on speculators in the sector. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said that the energy trading community may have played a major role in the volatility of energy prices over the last few years, and may need to expand its oversight of the practice. “<a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/28/energy-trading-in-focus-on-capitol-hill/" target="_blank">The American people are tired of excessive speculation and bubble economies caused by Wall Street greed</a>,&#8221; Senator Bernard Sanders, an independent from Vermont, said at the hearing, according to <strong><em>The New York Times</em></strong>. “They are tired of hedge fund managers and firms like Goldman Sachs making a fortune betting that the subprime mortgage market will continue to get worse or that more companies will go bankrupt.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Consumer confidence in the United States continues to wane: The Conference Board’s confidence index fell to 46.6 this month following a 49.3 reading in June. The key factor affecting confidence is unemployment. “Folks are still concerned about their jobs,&#8221; Mark Vitner, a senior economist at <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=14742678" target="_blank">Wells Fargo Securities LLC</a> told <strong><em>Bloomberg News</em></strong>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Month-to-month U.S. home prices in May grew 0.5% in May, the first increase in nearly three years according to the <strong>Standard &amp; Poor’s/Case-Shiller </strong><a href="http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/CSHomePrice_Release_072820.pdf" target="_blank">Home Price Indicies.</a> Year-on-year prices continue to decline on the 20-city index, falling 17.1%. “<a href="http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/CSHomePrice_Release_072820.pdf" target="_blank">The pace of descent in home price values appears to be slowing,</a>&#8221; said David M. Blitzer, chairman of the Index Committee at S&amp;P in a prepared statement. “While many indicators are showing signs of life in the U.S. housing market, we should remember that on a year-over-year basis home prices are still down about 17% on average across all metro areas, so we likely do have a way to go before we see sustained home price appreciation.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>In a move that should appease public outrage over Wall Street pay, the U.S. House Financial Services Committee approved legislation that would enable regulators to ban incentive pay at banks and give shareholders a vote on bonuses, <strong><em>Bloomberg News </em></strong>reported. The bill, adopted 40-28 yesterday (Tuesday),<a href="http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aYhdmIaV0uQo" target="_blank">would allow agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to prohibit compensation that encourages financial companies to take “inappropriate risks.&#8221;</a> The House of Representatives and Senate must pass the bill before U.S. President Barack Obama signs it into law. The House could vote as soon as Friday.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>International Business Machines Corp. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AIBM" target="_blank">IBM</a>) <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/27936.wss" target="_blank">acquired Chicago-based predictive analytics firm <strong>SPSS Inc.</strong></a><strong> </strong>(Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ASPSS" target="_blank">SPSS</a>) for $1.2 billion in cash, or $50 per share. The deal was valued at 40% above SPSS’ closing price of $35.09 on Monday. SPSS’ shares soared on the news yesterday (Tuesday), closing at $49.45, up 40.92% or $14.36. The worldwide market for business analytics software will swell to $25 billion this year, growing 4% over 2008, IBM said, citing <strong>Interactive Data Corp. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AIDC" target="_blank">IDC</a>) information.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Viacom Inc. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AVIA" target="_blank">VIA</a>) suffered a 32% drop in its second quarter bottom line, <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9MTEyNDJ8Q2hpbGRJRD0tMXxUeXBlPTM=&amp;t=1" target="_blank">citing a challenging global economy</a>. The media giant’s profit fell to $277 million, or 46 cents a share on revenue of $3.29 million for the quarter ended June 30. That compares to a net income of $406 million, or 64 cents a share on revenue of $3.85 billion in the same period last year. The company was encouraged that its premium movie channel, Epix, coming this fall, will appear in the lineup for subscribers of <strong>Verizon Communications Inc.’s </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AVZ" target="_blank">VZ</a>) FiOS television service. &#8220;<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE56R1WH20090728?sp=true" target="_blank">While we view this as an encouraging sign</a>, we note that Verizon FiOS has a very limited base of TV subscribers,&#8221; Spencer Wang said in a <strong><em>Reuters</em></strong> report. &#8220;We continue to believe securing distribution from larger operators [such as major cable companies] will be challenging.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/29/investment-news-briefs-51/">Investment News Briefs Wednesday, July 29, 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-wednesday-july-29-2009/19518/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.245 seconds -->

