Even Alan Greenspan admitted he had “found a flaw” in his own thinking. We will have to imagine the giggles from the back of the room – if anyone had been awake. It was as if Stalin had confessed to being rude to his mother or Bernie Madoff copped a plea for shoplifting. The mea was fine, but the culpa didn’t seem to measure up to the facts. He, more than any living human being, was responsible for the biggest financial debacle in history; you’d hope he’d be a gentleman about it and hang himself.

Meanwhile, the queen of England visited the London School of Economics and had a question: how come economists were not on top of this thing?

Last month, they replied. In a three page letter they avoided the simple truth – that their trade was no more reliable than fortune telling and marriage counseling. The letter claimed that a “psychology of denial” prevented government and financial eyes from seeing the catastrophe in front of them. It was “a failure of the collective imagination of many bright people”, they said.

In fact, it was the exact opposite — imagination run wild. Economists imagined a world without yesterday or tomorrow… a world in which you could run up debts forever and never have to pay them back.

Last week, Timothy Geithner promised the Chinese that the US economy would recover thanks to demand from the private sector. That was his way of reassuring America’s biggest creditor that the public sector wouldn’t continue to run huge deficits – practically an outright lie. But it’s one thing to stiff the Chinese; it’s another to stiff time.

Adjusted for inflation, the US consumer’s earnings barely rose from the ‘70s. By some measures, he had actually less disposable spending power in 2007 than he had in 1973. And now his income is going down. The June number reflected the biggest drop in income in 4 years. Salaries and wages fell 0.4% in June… the 9 th drop in the last 10 months. How is it possible for him to spend more?

We pose the familiar question only to set up an unfamiliar answer. In the past, the consumer reached into the future. In many cases, he reached beyond the future… into never, never land. Consumers spent money they hadn’t earned yet… thus bringing forward purchases that should have been made years later. The accumulated effect of this was to add $35 trillion in extra spending to the world economy – from America alone – over the course of the great credit expansion, 1945-2007. That’s why we have a depression now; because consumers already spent what they would normally be spending now.

Time always gets even. Now, it is the past that is doing the reaching. The automobile bought in 2006… the house bought in 2005… the vacation taken in 1999 – the ghosts of yesteryear spending reach for Americans’ paychecks. Of course, in some cases, consumers spent more than they could reasonably expect to pay back – ever. They reached so far the poor ghosts are disappointed. Lenders realized that they’d never get their money back, which is what led to the credit crunch and the collapse of Wall Street.

Of the big five – Bear, Lehman, Goldman (NYSE:GS), JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM) and Merrill (NYSE:SQD) – only two survived intact. And we know now that Goldman only survived because Henry Paulson, former CEO of Goldman, then Treasury Secretary, arranged a hidden bailout. He had the government step in to save AIG, which owed Goldman $13 billion.

From one scam to another… from bailing out Wall Street to bailing out the entire world economy, the more stimulus programs fail to bring a recovery, the more economists call for more stimulus.

What are they thinking? Since neither the private sector nor the public sector has any savings from the past, additional demand from either sector must be borrowed from the future. (Setting aside ‘quantitative easing’… or Zimbabwe – style stimulus… an even bigger fraud.)

The purest illustration of how this works is in the popular ‘cash for clunkers’ programs. Instead, of letting the consumer buy a new car when he is ready, the feds give them money to buy now. So, he buys in 2009 and not in 2010. What good is accomplished? It is as if they didn’t expect 2010 to ever arrive… as if they thought they could stop the sun and the seasons… and the Chinese… forever. Like moths in amber, their wings will never tatter… nor will their faith flag. The dollar will always be strong. US bonds will always be in demand. And the future will never arrive.

But the more economists try to stitch up the future; the more it gets away from them. After the 2010 sales have been moved forward to 2009, they will have to reach into 2011… and then 2012… all the way to the end of time.

Source: Stitch in Time

U.S. banks – under government order to raise capital as a result of the recently completed bank stress tests, and desperate to shed the onerous shackles of the U.S. Treasury Department’s Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) – have been announcing billions in secondary stock offerings in recent days, and experts say many more such deals can be expected.

Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (NYSE: APC), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) and Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) yesterday (Tuesday) became the latest U.S. companies to pursue new sources of capital, announcing deals that involved offerings of stock or debt, or outright asset sales.

Those announcements came just one day after four of the largest U.S. banks – BB&T Corp. (NYSE: BBT), Capital One Financial Corp. (NYSE: COF), U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: USB) and KeyCorp (NYSE: KEY) – announced plans to raise a combined $6.5 billion through stock offerings. At least some of the money raised will be used to repay the TARP money the federal government injected into troubled U.S. banks.

“All the deal activity sends a clear signal – investors are willing to take more risk,” says Louis Basenese, a longtime expert on the IPO market and editor of The Takeover Trader and White Cap Report newsletters. “And it’s already trickling down into the IPO space. In the next two weeks, four deals are slated, doubling the total volume for 2009.”

When asked if all these deals could end up soaking up all the capital that’s still sitting on the sidelines – blunting, as a result, the rally that’s had stocks surging over the past two months – Basenese said there’s no reason for that to be a concern.

“With $8 trillion-plus on the sidelines, we’ve still got a ways to go before the capital is gone,” Basenese said.
In fact, we may well be just getting started, he says.

“During slowdowns, the IPO space is as lonely as a geek on prom night. But right now, our geek might be getting lucky. Along with the market rally and strong appetite for secondary offerings, we’re seeing IPOs hit the market again,” Basenese said. “This week we get Digital Globe. Next week, OpenTable and SolarWinds are slated to debut. And there are over 100 more in the pipeline to fuel a sustained recovery.”

The Latest Deals

Yesterday’s announcements involved a carmaker, an energy company and a top U.S. bank.

Anadarko, an independent oil-and-gas exploration and production company based in Woodlands, Tex., said yesterday that it priced a public offering of 30 million shares at $45.50 each. Underwriters have an option to buy up to 4.5 million additional shares of the company’s common stock through the offering, which is expected to close Friday.

The company’s shares were down about 6% and listed at $45.70 in pre-market trading yesterday morning, FoxBusiness.com reported.

Bank of America, ordered to find $33.9 billion in new capital as a result of the recent bank stress tests, has finally sold about $7.3 billion worth of its shares in China Construction Bank Corp., Reuters and Bloomberg News both reported.

BofA sold 13.5 billion shares, or 6% of CCB, to investors including Hopu Investment Management Co. and Singapore sovereign wealth fund Temasek Holdings Pte. The sale cuts Bank of America’s stake in CCB to 10.6%.

Hopu Investment was founded in 2007 by Fang Fenglei, Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s (NYSE: GS) China partner. Hopu and Temasek have collaborated before; in late April, the two announced plans to invest $300 million in a Mongolian iron-ore mine. It was Hopu’s first deal since being launched as a private equity firm, Bloomberg News reported.

Bank of America’s sale of part of its CCB stake wasn’t news to Money Morning readers. In a story published in mid-January – “The Global Financial Crisis Will Cost Western Banks a Share of Future China Profits” – Money Morning reported that BofA was going to have to sell some of its stake in that key China bank. Indeed, the report detailed how banks in the United States and Europe would have to divest their interests in China’s promising banking market in order to close capital deficits created by the global financial crisis. The story was part of Money Morning’s ongoing investigation of the U.S. banking bailouts.

On Friday, BofA filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to sell as much as 1.25 billion shares of common stock, a move that would raise as much as $11 billion (given a proposed maximum offering price of $8.79 per share).

BofA said it will use the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes. Bank of America Securities LLC and Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: SQD) were listed as the underwriters for the stock offering.

Bank of America is also looking at still more asset sales to raise the rest of the required capital. Last Thursday the bank said it’s looking to end a loss-sharing agreement with the federal government on $118 billion of troubled assets, calling the agreement unnecessary – and too expensive.

Ford announced plans to sell 300 million common shares, and said it would use the proceeds from the offering for “general corporate purposes,” and to make a contribution to a fund that pays for healthcare for its retirees.

Total shares outstanding will increase to 3.102 billion – or to 3.148 billion if underwriter’s option for an additional 45 million shares is exercised.

Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) are acting as joint managers for the stock offering.

Ford’s shares closed yesterday at $5.01, down $1.07, or 17.6%, from Monday.

According to an SEC filing, a settlement with various unions calls for the initial three payments to be made on Dec. 31, 2009, June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2011. At each date, as much as $610 million of the amounts payable could be satisfied by the delivery of Ford common stock, valued at fixed prices of $2.00, $2.10 and $2.20 per share, respectively, the filing stated.

Ford intends to use a portion of the proceeds of this offering to fund all or a portion of the payments to the settlement fund – in lieu of delivering shares on those payment dates, according to a media report by 123Jump.com.

Ford Chief Executive Alan R. Mulally took advantage of the stock-offering announcement to say that Ford’s management and employees are making “strong progress on our transformation plan – gaining retail market share with great new products, improving quality, reducing costs and positioning Ford for a return to profitability.”

Ford also said that it’s unlikely the company will pay any dividend in the foreseeable future. Ford last paid dividends in the third quarter of 2006.

As Ford Sells Shares, So Do GM’s Top Execs

Interestingly, Ford is trying to sell shares to investors just as a group of top General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) executives – including GM Vice Chairman Robert A. “Bob” Lutz – have sold what was left of their personal stakes, according to several SEC filings on Monday. The stock sales by GM executives were reported by MarketWatch.com.

“Our shareholders are obviously facing some pretty severe dilution if the bond exchange goes through or we end up in bankruptcy,” GM spokesperson Julie Gibson told MarketWatch. “Either way, no matter the outcome, we’ll essentially be issuing new stock.”

She acknowledged to MarketWatch that the executives took advantage of a trading window to sell their shares while there’s still some value “like most reasonable people would do.”

GM’s executives sold their shares just as the company is trying to rid itself of $27 billion in debt by persuading thousands of creditors to exchange their bonds for 10% in GM stock.

According to the MarketWatch report, the SEC filings say that Lutz was joined by fellow Vice Chairman Thomas G. Stephens, Ralph J. Szygenda, Troy A. Clarke, Gary L. Cowger and Carl-Peter Forster. All together, the six sold nearly 205,000 shares between Friday and Monday, fetching between $1.45 and $1.61 a share.

GM’s shares closed yesterday at $1.15 each, or 20.14%.

It is worth noting that Money Morning Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson wrote this week that there’s a chasm of difference between the prospects of GM and Chrysler LLC – the two foundering members of Detroit’s “Big Three” – and Ford, which Hutchinson says may actually be worth investing in.

If the market shakes out as Hutchinson expects, Ford could emerge as only real winner among the U.S. automakers.

Under such a scenario, “Ford will pick up market share from GM and Chrysler, even if domestic brands overall continue to see their market share ebb,” Hutchinson wrote. “That will reduce Ford’s losses, and when the automobile market does rebound, the company that created the original automobile assembly line will move to a position of substantial profitability. For the first time since Henry Ford kept the Model T in production too long in the 1920s, Ford may become the dominant U.S.-controlled automobile manufacturer.”

As the secondary-offering market heats up, and the recession, Basenese, the stock-offering expert, says investors need to focus on these investment opportunities – and especially on those that emanate from the expected escalation in IPOs.

“History suggests IPOs are the place to invest coming out of a slump,” he said. “For proof, all we need to do is go back to the last ’severe’ recession on record, from 1973 to 1975. As we exited, IPOs turned in impressive numbers, with first day gains jumping to 40% and three-year returns climbing to more than 150%, easily outpacing the Standard & Poor’s 500.”

Source: Big Surge in Secondary Stock Offerings Will Lead to a Major Uptick in IPO Profit Plays

The stress-test results are expected to show that the 19 banks may have to raise between $100 billion to $150 billion – or even more – in new capital. Investors will cause the shares of the strong players to zoom northward, and will likely savage the shares of the weakest players.

“I can’t think of a time since I’ve been watching banks when there’s been so much uncertainty about the true value of a key set of assets,” Douglas Elliott, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank, told Reuters.

The U.S. bank stress tests have transfixed the world financial markets for weeks, exacerbating the ongoing financial crisis – worsening the U.S. recession and shaking economies around the world. That’s escalated the burden on the still-new Barack Obama administration and on the U.S. Congress.

The banks being tested include Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC), and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS). All told, the 19 banks hold two-thirds of total U.S. bank assets.

“Most banks will have to raise capital in some form,” Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group Capital Markets Group (NYSE: FBR) managing director Paul Miller told Reuters. “The capital raises will be much bigger than people think.”

Miller said that uncertainty about what the tests might reveal has made banks stocks “uninvestable” in the near term.

The issue for investors is that “you just don’t know how the government is going to view it,” Miller said.

Public release of the stress test results is set for Thursday. The government is scheduled to brief the top officials of the banks themselves tomorrow (Tuesday).

Although all but one of the 19 major U.S. banks the government has stress-tested reportedly passed, many skeptics believe the banks are still using all sorts of accounting dodges to keep from revealing just much they still hold in toxic assets and bad loans, National Public Radio reported.

Why wait for the U.S. Treasury Department’s bank stress test when Money Morning can highlight the four secrets that will let you separate the winners from the losers in the U.S. banking system?
Call it the “Money Morning Bank Stress Test.”

Money Morning Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson last week evaluated the 13 largest U.S. banks and rated them as either “Zombies,” “Walking Wounded,” “Risky But Proud,” and “Hidden Gems,” and concluded that nine of the banks pose some degree of risk. But he also found that four of the financial institutions are “Hidden Gems” that might be worth a look for investors.
On Thursday, we’ll finally see how it all plays out.

Market Matters

Chrysler LLC filed for bankruptcy and then forged a potentially “game saving” partnership with mighty Fiat SpA (OTC ADR: FIATY), Italy’s largest car manufacturer.  General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) will be saying good bye to its Pontiac brand (any interest, Fiat?).  Bank of America’s Ken Lewis was stripped of his board chair, but will continue to put out fires from the chief executive office.   Earnings season moved forward and Exxon-Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) did NOT set a new record for a change.  International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE: IBM) bucked the cost-cutting trend and actually raised its dividend.

With Treasury set to release the stress test results on Thursday, rumors are circulating that Bank of America and Citigroup may be in need of additional capital, though both are pleading their cases.  Meanwhile, Citi began lobbying for permission to pay retention bonuses to key employees [it worked for American International Group Inc. (NYSE: AIG) and Merrill Lynch (NYSE: SQD)], who may seek the greener pastures of other (ailing) financial institutions.

Telecommunications firms were in the spotlight early in the week as chipmaker Qualcomm Inc. (Nasdaq: QCOM) raised its revenue outlook and Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) actually announced increased earnings in the first quarter.  Verizon may be teaming up with Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) to develop its own touch-screen cell phone to cut into Apple Inc.’s (Nasdaq: AAPL) iPhone market share.

Drugmakers Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (NYSE: BMY) posted quarterly results that beat Wall Street expectations, as did The Dow Chemical Co. (NYSE: DOW) and Starbucks Corp. (Nasdaq: SBUX), though the latter’s major restructuring (store closures) prompted a 77% decline in profits.

MasterCard Inc. (NYSE: MA) confirmed that 2009 will be a challenging year, though rival Visa Inc. (NYSE: V) beat earnings estimates, as debit card usage increased, resulting in greater fee income.

The Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE: PG) struggled last quarter, with weaker sales, as shoppers traded down to lower-priced consumer goods.  Exxon-Mobil, Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX), and Royal Dutch Shell PLC (NYSE ADR: RDS.A, RDS.B) were victims of the declining global demand for oil.  Still, Exxon’s long-term outlook remains strong as the company continues pouring money into development projects to be fully prepared once the recession ends.  In fact, management even boosted its stock dividend.

Economically Speaking

While the U.S. Federal Reserve seemed to offer some “cautious optimism” about the overall direction of the economy, the policymakers avoided any sugarcoating and hedged their comments for fear of an unforeseen development (such as the “swine flu,” also known as the A/H1N1 flu).

While the virus quickly expanded across the globe, most of the worst cases have been limited to Mexico, where the already depressed economy will be further impacted from business closures and travel restrictions.

When SARS (Severe acute respiratory syndrome) hit in 2003, China’s gross domesic product (GDP) was estimated to have been hurt by about 1%; According to early projections by Moodys Corp.’s (NYSE: MCO) Economy.com, the Mexican economy will contract by 6.2% in 2009 (revised from the -4.5% estimate to account for the flu).

The Fed plans to leave rates at near 0.0% and stands prepared to purchase more Treasury and mortgage-related securities to keep the economy moving in the right direction.

The first quarter’s gross domestic product (GDP) highlighted a relatively hectic week on the economic front.  While the economy contracted from January through March at a worst-than-expected 6.1% clip, analysts found some positives deep within the release, as consumer activity actually picked up during the quarter.

The spending component rose by 2.2%, after falling by 4.3% in the fourth quarter.  Additionally, a decline in inventories hindered the release; however, economists point out that such a reduction indicates that manufacturers have scaled back production and will not be burdened with excessive supplies that may need to be deeply discounted to be sold. As demand slowly returns, they will be able to boost production once again.

Meanwhile, consumer confidence surprisingly soared to levels not seen since November 2008, which is especially good news, since the consumer accounts for about two-thirds to 70% of the activity in the economy.

Weekly Economic Calendar

Source: Market Moves Will Remain on Hold Until Bank Stress Test Results Are Released Thursday

Officials insist that neither Bank of America nor Citigroup should be viewed as insolvent, but people familiar with the situation told The Wall Street Journal that the capital shortfall amounts to billions of dollars at BofA. It is not clear how much of a shortfall Citigroup faces.

Analysts anticipate that some regional banks also will be required to raise more capital.

Banks that need more capital will have six months to accumulate the additional infusions by selling assets, selling more shares, or converting preferred government shares into common stock. If they are unable to build their capital through public and private sectors, the banks may again dip into taxpayer-funded government coffers.

Bank of America and Citigroup have received a combined $95 billion in taxpayer infusions, as well as hundreds of billions of dollars in government guarantees on bad, or “toxic,” assets.

The government may become Citi’s largest shareholder as soon as next month when the bank converts as much as $52 billion in preferred stock into common shares.

If the banks are forced to take on more government funding, top executives at both BofA and Citi could be forced to resign. Citigroup Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit and the bank’s board of directors faced the ire of shareholders at the company’s annual meeting last week. But even as tensions flared, efforts to oust the management fell flat, as 10 incoming members of the company’s board, some of whom have been in place for two decades, were affirmed by shareholder votes.

Top-tier executives at Bank of America may not be so fortunate. BofA shareholders today (Wednesday) will decide the fate of Chairman and CEO Kenneth Lewis. Lewis has come under fire for the company’s acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. (SQD) last year. Merrill Lynch lost $15.84 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008, contributing to a $1.79 billion loss at BofA and forcing the bank to seek out more government assistance.

“The same directors and management that entered the Merrill deal are still there, and we think they destroyed shareholder value on a permanent basis,” Jon Finger, whose Houston-based investment firm is urging votes against Lewis and lead director Temple Sloan, told the Charlotte Observer.

For his part, CEO Lewis testified before New York’s attorney general that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and former Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. pressured him to move ahead with the merger despite his reservations – while also keeping quiet about mounting losses at the crumbling investment bank.

“I can’t recall if he said, ‘We would remove the board and management if you called it [off],’ or if he said, ‘we would do it if you intended to.’ I don’t remember which one it was,” Lewis said, referring to a conversation he had with Paulson. “I said, ‘Hank, let’s de-escalate this for a while. Let me talk to our board.’”
Bank Stress Tests Called Into Question

Both Bank of America and Citigroup objected to the preliminary findings by the government. Citi, in particular, has expressed frustration with the investigation into its finances.

The regulators are asking “a million questions” and it’s “very unclear what they’re aiming at,” a senior executive told The Journal. “We can’t discern a pattern.”

Executives who met with regulators at the New York Federal Reserve headquarters on Friday, when the banks were first made aware that they would probably be asked to raise more capital, say they still don’t understand the government’s methodology.

The Journal cited people familiar with the matter as saying Citi wants to get credit for its recent effort to unload such businesses as Smith Barney and Nikko Cordial Services, the bank’s Japanese brokerage arm. While these businesses have not yet been offloaded, they’re expected to boost Citigroup’s capital levels.

Citi also has concerns about the assumptions used by the Fed in projecting future losses and revenue.

Citigroup executives aren’t the only ones questioning the Fed’s methodology, either.

Elizabeth Warren, who chairs the Congressional Oversight Panel for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), is just as confused as the Citigroup execs.

“I had believed that we would receive a much more detailed description of the stress tests last Friday,” Warren, who is known as the TARP watchdog, said Monday at the Reuters Global Financial Regulation Summit.

Unlike Citigroup, however, Warren said that one of her main concerns is that the stress tests being applied by regulators are not stressful enough.

Calling the adverse scenario used to test the banks’ health “disturbingly close” to current economic conditions, Warren sparked concern that a second round of tests might be needed.

“The stress tests will make a terrific contribution if they are tough and transparent,” she said. “If they are not, they will be useless.”

The fear that the stress tests are causing more harm and doing more to detract from investor confidence than to inspire it has been an underlying theme of the government plan.

Analysts speculate if government officials – under fire for not being more forthcoming about the details of their evaluations – were to release the methodology of the stress tests, analysts would compare that test criteria to public financial data and start to draw their own conclusions about which banks are likely to fail or will require additional infusions of capital.

“They’ve gotten themselves in a pickle on this thing,” Bert Ely, an independent banking analyst told The Los Angeles Times. “It’s clear they didn’t think through how this was going to play out.”

The results of the test were initially scheduled for release on Monday, but the government has since said the results will be released later in the week.

[Editor's Note: Money Morning Contributing Editor Shah Gilani, a retired hedge-fund manager and a recognized expert on the global credit crisis, says the bank stress tests are stressing out investors. To read his analysis, which appears elsewhere in today's issue of Money Morning, please click Bank Stress Test Report. The report is free of charge.]

Lose your pesky mortgage – but KEEP your home. Here’s how…

Americans from California to New York are discovering a new way to legally avoid monthly mortgage payments… while staying in their homes. It’s a simple secret that could allow you to own a home worth up to $500,000 for “free.” You’ll discover exactly how this technique works in a free strategy report from CNBC’s #1 bear-market analyst Peter D. Schiff. For complete details, just CLICK HERE now.

The identity of the bank that is alleged to have failed the bank stress test was not revealed.

The bank-stress-test findings were reported yesterday (Sunday) by CNBC.com, which said it obtained the information from a source that it did not identify. The source did not identify the company, CNBC.com reported.

“At least one firm – under the [bank] stress test assumptions – will require more capital,” the source said.

The bank-stress-test results were contained in a two-dozen-page report that the government released Friday. But the results had already been “conveyed” to the firms, meaning the bank in question is aware of the U.S. central bank’s assessment, according to the published report.

This round of bank stress tests was essentially a two-step process. The first step – outlining how the banks have been analyzed – was taken care of with the report released over the weekend.  The second step – releasing the results to the public – will be taken care of when the actual results are released May 4, which is one week from today (Monday).

Neither the U.S. Federal Reserve nor the U.S. Treasury Department would comment.

The bank stress tests have a very specific purpose. Financial institutions that are found to have inadequate capital will have six months to raise the money via the private sector. If that doesn’t work, the government has said the financial institutions will be eligible for an infusion of capital via the federal government’s so-called “Capital Access Program.”

U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said he would be open to banks repaying their Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) loans, as long as the availability of credit (borrowing) was not adversely affected.  As a Money Morning special report detailed last week, the credit markets don’t seem to be loosening up: Lending dropped by more than 20% from October 2008 to February 2009, despite initiatives to encourage such activity.

According to the conclusion of the report released over the weekend, “most banks currently have capital levels well in excess of the amounts needed to be well capitalized.”

However, as Money Morning has reported, the tests have become a “no-win” situation for the Obama administration.

“There are two things that are terribly wrong,” William M. Isaac, the Secura Group chairman who served as head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) from 1981 to 1985, told CNBC.com. The first problem – and a big one – is the fact that the details were announced at all.

“I can’t imagine what Treasury was thinking when it made that move. It has been causing incredible angst in the markets,” said Isaac. “The second big problem is that the Treasury is directing the stress testing, apparently with direct involvement of the White House at the highest levels. Bank regulation by law is supposed to be carried out by the independent banking agencies without any political interference.”

Market Matters

As Money Morning reported Friday – in a Wall Street version of the old “he said/(s)he said” drama, Bank of America Corp. (BAC) Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Kenneth Lewis claimed that ex-U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry M. “Hank” Paulson Jr. and central bank Chairman Ben S. Bernanke threatened to remove him from office if he backed out of the Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. (SQD) merger or (publicly) discussed the mounting losses.

Paulson had previously testified that Lewis must have misinterpreted their comments, but then seemed to blame Bernanke for the threat (Translation: Paulson tried to throw Bernanke “under the bus.”).

New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo has been investigating the activities surrounding the merger to determine why shareholders were kept in the dark about the financial “challenges.”

Shifting to autos, Italy’s Fiat SpA (OTC ADR FIATY) emerged as a potential major global player as it attempts to forge a partnership with (soon-to-be-bankrupt?) Chrysler LLC, and also has interest in buying General Motors Corp.’s (GM) Opel unit. Meanwhile, GM will be closing 13 production plants over the summer to trim inventory and seems likely to miss a $1 billion debt payment due June 1 as it too moves closer to bankruptcy protection.

How bad is GM’s plight: GM may close its Pontiac division after 82 years of operation, The Wall Street Journal and MarketWatch.com reported over the weekend.

While the earnings news of the week found plenty of winners and losers, ultimately analysts perceived a bit of “cautious optimism.”  Bank of America and Morgan Stanley (MS) failed to live up to the favorable showings by Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) and other financials, though techs like Texas Instruments Inc. (TXN), Apple Inc. (AAPL) and International Business Machines Corp. (IBM), beat Wall Street expectations, and brought new hope that the downturn was nearing an end. (Watch for an updated “Hot Stocks” feature on IBM here in Money Morning later this week).

Unfortunately, Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) posted the first quarterly revenue decline in its 23-year history, though investors still cheered its ability to reduce costs during these challenging times for PC sales. McDonald’s Corp. (MCD), AT&T Inc. (T), and Ford Motor Co. (F) were among the diverse group of companies reporting better-than-expected results, while United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS), Caterpillar Inc. (CAT), and Continental Airlines Inc. (CAL) issued disappointing numbers.

Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), the subject of a recent “Buy, Sell or Hold” feature here in Money Morning, bucked the negative trend facing many retailers and posted higher quarterly earnings and revenue.

Additionally, U.S. retailers J.C. Penney Co. Inc. (JCP) and Coach Inc. (COH) each expressed positive sentiment that sales activity seems to picking up.  Oracle Corp. (ORCL) snapped up Sun Microsystems Inc. (JAVA) for $7.4 billion after IBM chose to pass, and PepsiCo Inc. (PEP) is attempting to purchase two related bottling companies as corporate execs seek favorable deals in this environment.  Such merger-and-acquisition (M&A) transactions often signal boardroom confidence and also indicate that the “worst” part of a downturn may be over.

Oil prices surged above the $51-a-barrel level late in the week as traders overlooked the higher inventory levels and instead focused on some favorable signs that the economy may be closing in on turnaround mode.

With a six-week winning streak on the line, investors offered their best “clutch hitting” late Friday, pushing all major indexes to higher levels. Early in the week, after investors digested negative news from the likes of Bank of America and GM, prognosticators said the weekly stock-market winning streak was all but over. However, some better-than-expected earnings and economic reports brought out the “bulls” for one final run.  The Nasdaq Composite Index ended the week in positive territory, and the other equity indexes were virtually flat from last week’s closing levels (with the Dow Jones Industrial Average suffering a slight decline).

Economically Speaking

According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the global downturn will be far worse than previously expected.  For 2009, the IMF expects the world economy to contract by 1.3%, its first such decline in 60-years, with over 10 million employees losing their jobs.  Unfortunately, its projections for the United States are even more dire (-2.8% for the year), with domestic financial institutions suffering $2.7 trillion in losses, almost twice the IMF’s prior estimates from just six months ago.

While much of the economic data of the week confirmed the IMF’s weak projection, analysts found a few positive signs that the downturn very well may have bottomed out.  While both new home sales and durable goods orders declined in March, the results beat the weaker Street expectations and came in the aftermath of some (relatively) strong February numbers.

In another promising sign of stability within the housing sector, the median price of an existing home sold in March actually rose for the second straight month.  Still, the record unemployment filings last week revealed the ongoing difficulties facing job seekers amid these tight labor conditions.  Likewise, leading economic indicators, a predictive report, dropped for the third consecutive month and many economists expect the recession to last at least until late third quarter.

Weekly Economic Calendar

Source: Controversial Stress Tests Reveal Only One Bank Needs Capital, but Worries Remain