That’s why, in my investment letter, Outstanding Investments, I’ve constructed a kind of end-to-end offshore energy mutual fund – from prospect to pipeline. Each company has a broad skill set. None is just a one-trick pony. Some of the companies overlap in skill sets, and even compete with each other.

A few of my favorite names include Norway’s offshore powerhouse StatoilHydro (STO: NYSE), as well as subsea equipment provider FMC Technologies (FTI: NYSE). Then there’s platform and pipeline builder McDermott Intl. (MDR: NYSE), as well as offshore services provider Superior Energy Services (SPN: NYSE).

Going forward, I’m be looking to recommend other deepwater plays…at the right price, of course. I’m looking for companies that can grab hold of key parts of the growing offshore business, and produce great profits in the coming years. I think you’re going to be astonished at what unfolds.

I recently attended the annual convention of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG). (Some guys go to classic car shows; I go to geologist conventions). I’ve been a member of AAPG for 30 years, and it’s always fascinating to spend some time there. The meeting rooms and poster sessions feature reports from the front lines of the search for petroleum, natural gas and other energy resources.

One theme emerged loud and clear from this year’s conference: Deepwater. Most of the major oil discoveries that remain to be found in the world will be offshore, in deep water.

The always-ebullient Brazilian geochemist, Marcio Mello — CEO of Brazil’s HRT Petroleum Co. — wowed the crowd with a discussion of the oil potential of the South Atlantic. “Six of the last ten giant oil discoveries in the world were offshore Brazil,” he pointed out. And then Marcio moved the discussion to the other side of the South Atlantic and gave an eye-popping description of the oil potential of the offshore regions of Namibia.

“The Namibian offshore is analogous to that of Brazil,” Marcio stated, with slides and hard data to back it up. Then he showed his proprietary research into natural offshore oil seeps off Namibia, and the geochemistry that demonstrates immense hydrocarbon potential. “But Namibia,” said Marcio, “is way underexplored. So you can put down a little money for the concessions and get very rich.”

The point for investors is how much of future world energy development will involve subsea systems.

For additional perspective, let’s examine the current structure of the American energy supply. Right now, most of the U.S. energy mix comes from burning coal, natural gas and oil. In fact, according to the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. gets 87% of its total energy mix from burning fossil fuels. Another 7% of U.S. energy supply comes from nuclear power. The total is 94%.

That leaves about 6% of the U.S. energy mix to come from so-called “renewable” and alternative sources. And 3% of that 6% is renewable hydropower from unique sources like the Hoover, Grand Coulee and other dams. And we’re not building any more big dams.

Thus, only about 3% of U.S. total energy comes from things that grow, blow or shine. Of that 3%, about half (1.5%) is from “biofuels,” and that’s if you count a company like Weyerhaeuser (WY: NYSE) burning sawdust to run the sawmills.

Finally, there’s a very minor part of the total U.S. energy mix — about 1.5% — that comes from windmills, solar and geothermal. For as much visibility as these things get in the media and pop culture, their energy output is tiny — slightly above statistical noise in the overall national mix.

So just follow the numbers. The “alternative” energy sources are a miniscule component of the current energy mix. That’s after a few good years of significant investment, with lots of political support and plenty of tax breaks.

It will take many years (many decades!) for these energy sources to expand and meet the energy needs of the U.S. And that’s despite whatever the politicians and policymakers wish for in their dreams.

That’s why the U.S. must continue exploring for oil and gas. I cringe when I look at the falling rig counts in the U.S. and around the world. Every well that’s NOT drilled is one less source of hydrocarbon in the years to come, as depletion causes output from current wells to decline…which brings us back to the South Atlantic, one of the world’s greatest petroleum provinces.

Some experts think that the hydrocarbon resources in the pre-salt formations off the Brazilian coast may rival those of Saudi Arabia in magnitude. We’ll see about that. But it’s beyond dispute that Brazil and its energy resources are a complete game-changer for that nation, and the rest of the energy-consuming world. It goes back to basic geology and the history of plate tectonics.

When South America started to pull away from Africa about 140 million years ago, an isolated seaway formed — a proto-Atlantic Ocean — that filled again and again with sequences of limestone, thin shales and, finally, massive salt beds. The processes of petroleum geology worked as advertised in the region. And these processes left utterly eye-popping volumes of petroleum locked in high-quality reservoirs covering vast areas.

The big downside (and it’s big and down, to be sure!) is that all that oil is under a mile or two of South Atlantic seawater, covered by three or four miles of rock and salt beds — it depends where you’re located on the continental shelf and slope.

But that’s why it takes companies with phenomenal technical and managerial skills, plus deep pockets, to play in this great game. The bottom line is that with the right companies working at it, there’s enough oil down there to produce a very big payday, not just for Brazil, but for many of the companies that contribute to the effort.

I’ll discuss at length the new developments offshore Brazil during my talk in Vancouver at the upcoming Investor Symposium, July 21-24. The title of my talk will be Is God Brazilian? So that ought to give you a clue about what I think lies under all that water column and rock down there.

Source: Deep, Wet and Brazilian

And that suggests higher oil and gasoline prices in coming months – perhaps as much as 50% – 70% higher, or more – particularly if a U.S. economic recovery is truly in the offing.

To really see what I’m talking about, let’s start with a close look at consumption. I’m asked about this frequently in my global wanderings, most recently at the Las Vegas Money Show last week.

For months we’ve been hearing about a drop in global demand. It’s a popular story and one that sounds credible: After all, it seems logical to assume that during economic chaos, consumers and businesses alike will rethink their budgets and ratchet back their spending.

For consumers, the continued economic malaise will mean fewer trips to the store, less-ambitious vacations, and car-pooling to school or work . For businesses, the cutbacks by consumers will clearly translate into canceling trips where conference calls will suffice and using lower-cost shipping alternatives for the decreased sales volumes most U.S. companies will experience.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, oil consumption fell by nearly 50,000 barrels a day throughout 2008. According to the latest figures, the EIA suggests that global oil demand may slump to 83.4 million barrels a day in 2009 – nearly 2.4 million barrels below 2008 consumption levels. On a percentage basis, that’s almost a 3% drop. I have my doubts that we’ll actually see a decline of this magnitude, but if it does occur, it will be the first time ever that consumption has declined for two straight years. That alone is pretty noteworthy in this era of cohesive and powerful global growth.

The reason I have my doubts about such a steep decline in demand is this: While overall consumption is dropping in such developed economies as the United States, Europe and Australia, it’s being at least partially offset by continued growth in China, the Middle East and Latin America. Because the data produced there is less than transparent, I can’t help but think that analysts are underestimating the growth we’ll be seeing in those markets, where consumption is accelerating strongly. And it’s entirely possible that growth in those markets will outstrip any fall here in the developed world.

Even if the growth in the emerging markets doesn’t quite offset the decline in their developed brethren, analysts seem to be forgetting that oil prices are a function of two variables – consumption and production. And it’s the change in production that’s going to catch a lot of people by surprise.

After a run of record high oil prices punctuated by frantic resources development, we’re now seeing the opposite scenario. The long period of lower than anticipated oil prices following oil’s meteoric rise last year means that the entire industry is no longer making the investments needed to sustain production capacity or actual production.

And not many folks recognize this fact.

For instance, direct project investment in drilling may be down as much as 20%, while the number of drill rigs in operation in America alone has dropped by more than 40%. Various estimates from the EIA and private sources suggest that actual U.S. production may fall by as much as 320,000 barrels a day. While the amount is a matter of debate, the fact that production is declining is not.

More than 20% of total U.S. oil production comes from tiny wells located in remote areas that were marginally profitable producers when crude oil was trading at $100 a barrel. With oil currently at about $61 a barrel, those producers are practically worthless now.  So the “mom-and-pop” shops that own them are actually abandoning entire fields and equipment without a moment’s thought.

To be fair, at least part of the drop in demand can be attributed to increased reliance on methanol, ethanol and other types of biofuel, but that’s hard to quantify at the moment because the long period of low oil prices has eroded the economic viability of alternative fuels – at least for now.

The story is much the same with new exploration projects being cancelled left, right and center. The trend is particularly apparent in the Canadian oil sands that were everybody’s fancy only 24 months ago. Now we’re seeing Royal Dutch Shell PLC (NYSE ADR: RDS.A, RDS.B), StatoilHydro ASA (NYSE ADR: STO) and Petro-Canada USA (NYSE: PCZ) each backing away from multi-million dollar investments that were to bring online an estimated 500,000 barrels a day.

Russian, Saudi and Mexican producers are reporting the biggest production drops seen in 50 years. Even Venezuelan leader President Hugo Chavez – the perennial motor mouth and longtime U.S. critic – is eating crow. He’s begrudgingly invited (read that to mean “is begging”) the oil companies whose assets he nationalized only a year ago to “come back” into the market.

He has no choice. Venezuela’s oil production is already below its 1997 levels, and many analysts say that output could fall even more since Chavez has done such a thorough job of alienating the big foreign oil companies that actually possess the technology needed to extract crude oil from that country’s hard-to-reach reserves.

Chavez’s Chavez’s government seized the assets of 60 foreign and domestic oil service companies after conflict erupted over nearly $14 billion in debt owed by the country’s state-owned energy company, Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA). PDVSA accumulated the debt as oil prices took a dramatic slide from over $147 a barrel last July to less than $35 a barrel in February.

Then there’s simple shrinkage. This is an oil industry term for declining output. The EIA recently released data suggesting that production at more than 800 oil fields around the world is going to decline by about 9.1%. It doesn’t matter whether the decline is prompted by depletion, war, or simple neglect. The fact is that this shrinkage will take an estimated 7.6 million barrels per day out of the system.

I could go on but I think you get the picture.

Now imagine what could happen to oil-and-gasoline prices when normalized demand resumes. Not only will there be less oil in storage, but virtually the entire industry – exploration, production, refining and sales – is going to be caught sitting on its heels when the world needs it to be zooming along in high gear. And that means the companies that make up this industry will have to ramp up again to meet the newly increased consumption demands.

This whole process could take two years – or even longer – to play out.

As for prices, history is replete with examples of what happens when there are major shortages of key commodities.

In the Energy Crisis of 1973-74, for example, I can still remember the numbingly long gas lines and waiting in the car for hours to get a fill-up. My father and grandfather vividly remember that prices quadrupled in a matter of months. I’m sure you do, too.

Only a few years later, in 1979, we got another oil shock when prices quadrupled again. Because it was coupled with stagnant economic growth and virulent inflation (stagflation), this period was an economic disaster for the United States.

For those who had learned from the earlier crisis, however, it was a mondo- profit opportunity.

The same can be said for 2007-2008, when the huge spike in oil prices that I predicted contributed to the bear market in stocks, tight credit and recessionary conditions that led to the current malaise that continues to grip the U.S. economy. As much as anything else, high oil prices contributed to the carnage we’ve seen in the auto-making and airline industries, and to the financial crisis that started here before spanning the globe.

Which brings us full circle.

Many investors will refuse to believe we’ve arrived at this new energy nexus, especially given all the hype we’ve seen surrounding alternative fuels, hybrid vehicles and the new “green” mentality that’s taken hold here in this country. If you listen to some of the real believers, they’ll tell you that we could be living in a petroleum-free Nirvana – as early as tomorrow.

While I personally would like that, too, it’s a misleading argument if for no other reason than there are millions of consumer items we use – from plastic bags to makeup – still created using petroleum. And there are still more than 60,000 manufacturing processes that depend on petroleum, and even the most aggressive estimates suggest that it will take the world decades to shift away from them.

We’re in much the same situation when it comes to hybrid vehicles. There isn’t a mass-produced electric vehicle available today that could offset the coming rise in recovery-driven demand for oil and gasoline. There’s a strong effort underway, but I’m not aware of a single company ready to field the solution in cost-affordable quantities by 2010 – which is when most analysts say a recovering economy will stoke demand for oil.

Of course, U.S. President Barack Obama’s much-lauded efficiency and greenhouse-gas-standards mandate will help significantly, but that’s like bolting the barn door after the horses have run for the fields. The irony of watching auto executives “applaud” his press conference was almost too much to watch with a straight face. But that’s a story for another time.

The bottom line is this: Our society will be highly dependent on oil for many years to come and investors should plan accordingly.

If governments around the world really want to get serious, they could collectively work to eliminate the fuel subsidies that are part of the price paid for gasoline in Asia or sugarcane ethanol in Brazil. We could also stop our own energy pork barreling. But given the complete lack of transparency that surrounds this issue – not to mention the influence wielded by vested industry interests, and the scores of well-paid lobbyists that patrol the halls of power in our nation’s capital – I don’t think we’ll see any big changes anytime soon.

So I’m left with one inescapable conclusion, at least in the intermediate term. Every investor needs to have at least some sort of energy strategy – preferably one that includes a range of drillers, producers and suppliers to cover the spectrum from wellhead to consumer.

That way, we can profit from an increase in energy prices that we can only hope rise fast enough to jump-start the oil industry’s production arm but not so fast that it snuffs out the badly needed economic recovery.

Editor’s Note: Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald is the editor of the new Geiger Index trading service. As the whipsaw trading patterns investors have endured this year have shown, the ongoing global financial crisis has changed the investment game forever. Uncertainty is now the norm and that new reality alone has created a whole set of new rules that will help determine who profits and who loses. Investors who ignore this “New Reality”will struggle, and will find their financial forays to be frustrating and unrewarding. But investors who embrace this change will not only survive – they will thrive. With the Geiger Index, Fitz-Gerald has already isolated these new rules and has unlocked the key to what he refers to as “Golden Age of Wealth Creation” The Geiger Index system allows Fitz-Gerald to predict the price movements of broad indexes, or of individual stocks, with a high degree of certainty. And it’s particularly well suited to the kind of market we’re all facing right now. Check out our latest report on these new rules, and on this new market environment.

Source: With Oil Prices Poised to Jump as Much as 70%, Every Investor Needs an Energy Strategy

This from The Rude Awakening:

During times like these, it’s all too easy to become caught up in the moment. Fear is a powerful emotion. As the markets continue to crumble, many investors lose sight of their goals. They sell positions indiscriminately; they become irrational.

The sell-off we’re experiencing right now is global. And no stock or commodity has escaped the devastation. That’s why we’re looking at a scarce and valuable resource for steady long-term gains: oil.

One energy guru recently made a big bet on oil. He repurchased shares of Exxon (NYSE:XOM), ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP), Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE:PXD), BP (NYSE:BP) and Statoil (NYSE:STO) — all at rock-bottom prices. We say he RE-purchased these shares because, in a prescient move, this sage sold off every oil stock he owned in May…back when oil was sitting atop $129 per barrel.

Richard Rainwater knew he would be leaving the party a bit early to the party — and probably miss the top — when he sold his oil investments back in spring. But he also knew that the gains from his $300 million invested in oil stocks and futures were in jeopardy.

“I just felt that America was not ready for $4 gas and we would see a pause here,” he told Time magazine in June.

Rainwater cashed in his profits just before oil’s peak in July. Now, he’s ready to do it all over again, spreading his millions across Exxon, ConocoPhillips and other big-name petroleum pushers.

Rainwater’s outlook is simple: Increased worldwide demand will continue to push the oil price up in the long term. Rainwater’s not alone, either. Analysts and industry experts — like oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens and OPEC President Chakib Khelil — have been making it perfectly clear…oil won’t be down too long.
On July 11, 2008, oil made a record ascent to $147.27 — a 123% jump in only 12 months. Since that momentous event, however, it has been all downhill for the energy sector. As the nearby chart illustrates, oil stocks (yellow line) have been closely tracking the downward trajectory of crude oil (blue line).

With oil sitting below $60 right now, oil aficionados like Pickens are bracing for the run-up to come. “The Saudis claim they have more oil; they don’t. The president wasted his time to go to Saudi Arabia, to say, ‘Give us more oil.’ They can’t give any more oil…they’re stacking up the money as fast as they can stack it up,” warned Pickens in an interview with CNBC.

The allure of oil is hard to refute. With finite supplies and unquenchable demand, it’s clear why many investment houses put oil above $200 in the near future. According to Pickens, it’s just a case of an oil-hungry economy overwhelming producers: “Eighty-five million barrels of oil a day is all the world can produce, and the demand is 87 million. It’s just that simple. It doesn’t have anything to do with the value of the dollar.”

Now is the time to buy oil. The second quarter of 2008 saw the largest drop in oil prices in 17 years. Now with OPEC slashing its production outlook for the rest of 2008 and 2009, it’s unclear just how long prices will be able to stay under $100…much less under $57.

Source: Surviving the Selloff

• Reeling from the housing and credit crisis, luxury-home builder Toll Brothers Inc. (TOL), reported a 41% dive in its fiscal fourth-quarter revenue, Bloomberg reported. “Unfortunately, the preliminary signs of stability we had discussed in early September were upended by the past month’s financial crisis,” Chief Executive Officer Robert Toll said in a statement.

• Despite first-half profit falling 35% and a reduced sales forecast, Vodaphone Group Plc (VOD) investors cheered the company’s plan to focus on cash generation and tightened capital, MarketWatch reported. The world’s largest mobile phone provider also raised its interim dividend by 3.2%.

• Tyco International Ltd. (TYC) more than doubled net income in its fiscal fourth quarter, The Wall Street Journal reported. But the electronics and security system provider projected that fiscal 2009 results would fall below analysts’ estimates.

• Cash-flush StatoilHydro ASA (STO) said it will buy an inital 32.5% stake in the Chesapeake Energy Corp.’s (CHK) 1.8 million-acre Marcellus shale gas reserve. StatoilHydro doled out nearly $3.4 billion for the unconventional energy source, filling a huge hole at Chesapeake, which has a heavy debt burden, Reuters reported.

• The price of oil hit a 20-month low yesterday falling $3.08 to settle at $59.33 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange – the lowest closing price since March 2007.

• Sirius XM Radio Inc. (SIRI) said yesterday (Tuesday) that its third-quarter losses totaled $4.88 billion, or $1.93 a share. Revenue more than doubled to $488.4 million, from $241.8 million, however. On an adjusted basis, revenue soared 16% from $529.2 million last year, to $612.8 million.

Source:Global Investing Roundups Wednesday, November 12th, 2008

Greg Guenthner isn’t sweating it.

Oil prices have been caught up in widespread panic selling of recent months. It remains a scarce and essential commodity. This means it is only heading in one direction over the long term.

Greg recommends following oil guru Richard Rainwater’s cue and buying into oil stocks with both hands.

This from Penny Sleuth:

When the markets go to hell, it’s all too easy to become caught up in the moment. Fear is a powerful emotion. We all witnessed this firsthand as the market’s decline accelerated. As the markets continue to crumble, many investors lose sight of their goals. They sell positions indiscriminately; they become irrational.

The sell-off we’re experiencing right now is global. And aside from some safe-haven gold buying, no stock or commodity has avoided the bears. That’s why we’re looking at a scarce and valuable resource for steady long-term gains: oil.

One energy guru has recently made a big bet on oil.

He bought back shares of Exxon (NYSE:XOM), ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP), Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE:PXD), BP (NYSE:BP) and Statoil (NYSE:STO) — all at rock-bottom prices. We say he bought these shares back because, in a prescient move, this sage sold off every oil stock he owned in May…back when oil was sitting atop $129 per barrel.

A Fresh Oil Investment

Richard Rainwater knew he would be a bit early to the party — and probably miss the top — when he sold his oil investments back in spring. But with a stellar track record including massive gains betting on everything from hospitals to cell phones, he knew gains from his $300 million invested in oil stocks and futures were in jeopardy.

“I just felt that America was not ready for $4 gas and we would see a pause here,” he told Time magazine in June.

Rainwater pulled his billions in profits just before oil’s peak in July. Now, he’s ready to do it all over again, spreading his millions across Exxon, ConocoPhillips and other big-name petroleum pushers.

***********************************

Oil at $150 per barrel and gasoline at $8 a gallon or more…

The oil is running out. It’s as simple as that.

But that’s not what you hear from so-called experts. If you ask government officials, our intelligence agencies and even powerful Wall Street financiers, they tell you the opposite.

They say the Saudis could quickly double their oil production from the current level if they wanted to. And given a few years, they think the Saudis could produce four times as much oil as they do now.

They are dead wrong. Check it out here…

***********************************

Overwhelming Demand Will Prop Oil Prices

Rainwater’s outlook is simple: Increased worldwide demand will continue to push the oil price up in the long term. Rainwater’s not alone, either. Analysts and industry experts — like oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens and OPEC President Chakib Khelil — have been making it perfectly clear…oil’s on the rise again.

On July 11, 2008, oil made a record ascent to $147.27 — a 123% jump in only 12 months.  With oil sitting around $80 right now, oil aficionados like Pickens are bracing for the run-up to come. “The Saudis claim they have more oil; they don’t. The president wasted his time to go to Saudi Arabia, to say, ‘Give us more oil.’ They can’t give any more oil…they’re stacking up the money as fast as they can stack it up,” warned Pickens in an interview with CNBC.

The allure of oil is hard to refute.

With finite supplies and unquenchable demand, it’s clear why many investment houses put oil above $200 in the near future.

According to Pickens, it’s just a case of an oil-hungry economy overwhelming producers: “Eighty-five million barrels of oil a day is all the world can produce, and the demand is 87 million. It’s just that simple. It doesn’t have anything to do with the value of the dollar.”

Now is the time to buy oil. The third quarter of 2008 saw the largest drop in oil prices in 17 years.

Now with OPEC slashing its production outlook for the rest of 2008 and 2009, it’s unclear just how long prices will be able to stay under $100.

Source: Prevailing in the Midst of Paranoia

Don Miller says industry insiders are now betting on triple-digit crude oil prices for the next decade. And long-term oil futures show demand will continue to outstrip supply, as Asia industrializes and proven reserves diminish.

Don says Transocean Inc. (NYSE:RIG), StatoilHydro ASA (NYSE:STO), and Petrobras (NYSE:PZE) are likely to benefit from new drilling projects. And the company that supplies equipment lines for 90% of oilrigs, National Oilwell Varco (NYSE:NOV), is also well placed for profits.

Want to know what the price of a barrel of oil will be in eight years? Exactly $119.50 a barrel.

There’s no shortage of pundits predicting where oil prices are heading. And every day seems to bring new reasons to change the forecast – a resurgent dollar, Americans curtailing their driving habits, oil supply reports… The list goes on.

But the guys who really know the future of oil prices are those sitting right in the driver’s seat – oil producers.

Every day, they make bets about the direction of petro prices on the futures market. And right now, they’re telling you – in no uncertain terms – oil’s got a floor price of $100 a barrel for years to come.

“Oil-flation” is here to stay, but this free report reveals four ways you can beat it starting now…

The Future Price of Oil – And Why You don’t Need a Crystal Ball

Crude oil is the world’s most actively traded commodity. Every day, oil producers trade futures contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) to hedge against price swings.

At the end of the day, they – along with speculators who bring liquidity to the market – determine the price of oil, which is simply a reflection of the market’s attempt to balance supply and demand.

So, that prediction of $119.50 a barrel? That’s a recent closing price on NYMEX for the December 2016 contract.

Fact is, NYMEX has over 1,000,000 active futures contracts or “open interest” on crude oil for the next eight years and not one trades below $112 a barrel.

That means the guys in the business – the ones who make their living producing and selling oil – are predicting oil will be priced over $112 a barrel for most of the next decade.

Why are they predicting the continuation of triple digit oil prices?

Plain and simple, the markets are telling us future demand for oil will outstrip supplies.

Demand for Oil Keeps Growing

Although demand is highest in the developed world, exploding economies like China and India are quickly becoming large oil consumers.

The United States is still the world’s largest consumer of petroleum and our thirst for oil is growing rapidly. Between 1995 and 2005, U.S. consumption grew from 17.7 million barrels per day (bpd) to 20.7 million bpd – a 17% increase.

In the same time frame, China’s consumption vaulted from 3.4 million bpd to 7 million bpd – a 106% increase. And that number’s rising, as China surpassed 8 million bpd for the first time in June.

Meanwhile, India’s oil imports are expected to more than triple from 2005 levels by 2020, rising to 5 million bpd.

All totaled, Asia accounts for 60% of the world’s new oil demand.

Putting a worldwide number on it, the International Energy Association recently increased its 2009 oil demand forecast to 87.8 million barrels a day.

On top of that, The U.S. Energy Information Administration projects world consumption of oil to increase to 98.3 million bpd in 2015 and 118 million bpd in 2030. That’s a 35% increase by 2030.

Oil Production Dropping?

By now, you’ve probably heard of the Peak Oil theory – that worldwide oil production has peaked and is now dropping. Consider:

• The U.S. Energy Information Administration Energy contends that world production leveled out in 2004, and reached a peak in the third quarter of 2006.
• Oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens recently told Congress, “I believe you have peaked out at 85 million bpd globally.”
• And at a recent industry conference, the chief executive officer of Total SA (ADR: TOT), the French oil major, said the industry would be lucky to produce 95 million bpd by 2020.

But whether you believe Peak Oil is true or not, at least nine of the largest 21 oil fields on the planet are in decline.

In 2006, a Saudi Aramco spokesman admitted that its mature fields are declining 8% per year. It’s now clear that Ghawar, the largest oil field in the world, has peaked.

The second largest, the Burgan field in Kuwait, started down in 2005. And Mexico announced that its giant Cantarell Field entered depletion in 2006.

Reserves Don’t Equal Production

Then there’s the matter of oil reserves, a moving target if there ever was one.

You see, oil reserves are classified three ways: proven, probable and possible. Proven reserves have at least 90% to 95% certainty of entering production. Probable reserves have 50% probability. And possible reserves have a 5% to 10% chance.

A 2007 report by the Energy Watch Group pegged total world proven plus probable reserves at between 850 and 1,250 billion barrels. That’s 30 to 40 years of supply if demand holds steady – which it won’t.

But as Sadad I. Al Husseini, a former VP of Aramco, said in October 2007, “Reserves are confused and inflated. Many of the so-called reserves are in fact speculative. They’re not delineated, they’re not accessible, they’re not available for production.”

By Al-Husseini’s estimate, 300 billion of the world’s proven reserves should be re-categorized as speculative.

On top of that, about 70 oil-producing nations don’t reduce their reserves to account for yearly production. As noted investor Jim Rogers says, “Despite consistently pumping 8 million bpd for over two decades, Saudi Arabia has repeatedly stated their reserves are at 267 billion barrels.”

Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) member nations even have economic incentives to exaggerate their reserves, as the OPEC quota system allows greater output for countries with bigger reserves.

The reality is this: it’s highly likely we have a lot less than 1,200 billion barrels to burn in the next 30 to 40 years.

And increasing demand could have us running on fumes in an even shorter span.

New Production — a Pipe Dream?

Even though we continue to hear about new oil discoveries, new oil reserves will be harder to find and extract.

Take Kazakhstan, for instance. Its oil fields are slated to be the third largest in the world. The heralded Kashagan field should produce 1.5 million bpd at its peak. But technical problems continue to plague the project.

In 2005, production was scheduled to start in 2009. A year ago that was moved to 2011 and now it’s been pushed back to 2013. And the projected cost has risen to a whopping $50 billion.

Canada’s oil sands are another example. Production could reach 5 million bpd by 2030 in a “crash program,” but the oil contains contaminants such as sulfur and carbon that are difficult to extract and leave highly toxic tailings.

Frankly, the most easy-to-extract oil has been found. Price increases have led to exploration where high technology is required and where it is much more expensive to extract the oil.

We are replacing OPEC oil that costs $3 per barrel to produce with deep-water and other nonconventional sources at $60 per barrel and up.

And that’s why the markets are predicting triple digit oil prices are here to stay.

Four Ways to Play “Oil-Flation”

Here’s a four-prong strategy to help you ride the oil bull market into the future and get your share of the profits.

Lehman Brothers predicts that oil producers will spend a record $369 billion on energy projects this year. With oil prices still in record territory, oil companies are drilling wells in waters previously considered cost-prohibitive. And with President Bush calling for the reopening of offshore drilling, look for the trend to accelerate.

Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald recommends StatoilHydro ASA, an integrated oil company headquartered in Norway. The company is now the world’s largest energy operator in waters more than 100 meters deep and produces, on average, 1.7 million barrels of oil equivalent per day.

It has proven reserves of more than 6 billion barrels of oil, has operations in 34 countries, and is expanding aggressively to diversify internationally.

You might also look at Transocean Inc., the world’s largest provider of offshore drilling services for oil and gas wells. Its fleet includes ultra-deepwater and harsh environment semisubmersibles, and drill ships.

In November, Transocean merged with GlobalSantaFe, combining the world’s No. 1 and No. 2 offshore drilling companies. The company now owns 138 offshore rigs, twice the number of its nearest competitor.

It also just signed a $1.69 billion agreement with Petrobras, Brazil’s government-sponsored oil company to provide rigs for its newly discovered Tupi field. With over 40 billion barrels in reserves – three times the size of Alaska’s Prudoe Bay field – Tupi could be a bonanza for both companies.

Another way to capitalize is buying companies that outfit drilling rigs with pipe, fittings, and provide oil-exploration and field-management services. National Oilwell Varco is the “picks and shovels” play in the oil services industry, with the lion’s share – over 60% – of the market for rig gear.

The company’s huge product line is found on about 90% of all drilling rigs. It’s been growing revenues at almost 40% for the past three years while increasing earnings per share by a whopping 68%.

And don’t ignore the burgeoning alternative energy field. Both Sens. Obama and McCain are pledging over $150 billion in renewable and alternative energy initiatives during the next decade.

As Fitz-Gerald likes to say, “alternative energy is an alternative no longer.” Vestas Wind Systems (PINK: VWDRY) is the world leader with over 35,000 wind turbines installed in 63 countries. It is the industry leader in wind technology with 23% of the market worldwide, and a full 85% share of the market for turbines with a capacity of 2 megawatts and higher.

Be cautious with this one as its stock is up over 300% in the last 18 months. But with a surging government investment climate in alternative energy in the U.S., the company should continue to benefit.

Source: Four Ways to Fight the “Oil-Flation Epidemic”

Not just coal though…coal seam gas. Black rock is the new black. Rock on.

We emailed our full wrap-up of the sector to our beloved Diggers and Drillers fraternity a couple of days ago. But the big-wig of the sector is Santos (ASX:STO).

Santos, after wooing several potential partners, has found a mate to invest in its LNG export terminal at Gladstone. Petronas, Malaysia’s state oil and gas investment vehicle, grabbed 40% of the project for AU$2.6 billion. Santos must have laid the woo on pretty thick.

But woo is an infectious disease in the hard asset sector these days. You have to wade through a viscous slurry of woo to get anywhere. Romance is blossoming…covetous, greedy-eyed romance. Everyone wants someone else’s stuff.

How else could Australia’s largest sugar producer make 38% of its revenues from building products…35% from aluminium…and just 19% from sugar? It’s been doing some whacky diversifying.

Whacky or not, Gabriel has caught the sweet scent of gains in CSR’s (ASX:CSR) chart. As usual, you’ll find him toiling away down at the bottom of the e-letter.

This new Santos story opens up another door for coal-seam gas producers. BG’s bid at the start of this month was like connecting a jumper lead for stocks with coal-gas. Petronas’ foray will shift share prices up a gear again. Two of the world’s largest LNG producers have thrown their back into Australia’s top-notch coal-seam gas reserves. If they play this right, the stuff should be whizzing out of port and up to China within a few years.

How good is that demand source though?

Huge Growth in LNG Demand

Well, latch your peepers onto this offering from ABARE. It shows you what LNG demand is capable of doing in the next few years. LNG is as good as any fossil fuel, but it’s one of the cleaner ones. So it’s getting top billing these days.

Growth just keeps popping up in the energy sector. A thought hit us late yesterday on the topic. We think the oil price is too hot to touch right at this instant. Further down the track, it’ll be a little cheaper.

But when it comes back a little, that doesn’t mean things go back to normal.

The current spike in oil prices tells you something. No-one has full control over the oil price. The purpose of OPEC in the first place was to keep oil between US$22 and US$28. Obviously it didn’t keep it there.

Curious. How could that be?

It’s an interesting story. Glad you asked.

Saudi Arabia runs its oil operations like a family Italian restaurant. In theory, everyone owns a bit of the business. There aren’t private interests like Santos (ASX:STO) or Woodside (ASX:WPL). Aramco is Arabia’s oil producer. The profits from oil then go to the government.

Of course the last link in the chain, where the government transfers money to its people, is usually missing.

But Saudi Arabia is a lot richer than it used to be. As we said in a previous Money Morning, at US$130 it pulls in revenues of well over a billion dollars a day. And that means it has spare liquidity to pour into investments. Those investments will, of course, be the source of its income when oil eventually runs out.

One of them is Australian. Bemax Resources (ASX:BMX) recently received a takeover offer from Arabian National Titanium Dioxide Company. Bemax burrows around in Australia’s vast mineral sand resource. Among other things, it produces minerals containing titanium and zircon.

As Dan Denning notes in a recent Australian Small-Cap Investigator, these metals are getting a lot of demand from ceramics industries. He’s put a magnifying glass to the whole sector. It doesn’t seem like anyone else has heard of the potential here. We’d thought you’d be interested. Foresight here could be very profitable indeed.

So Arabian National Titanium put up a AU$300 million takeover offer. Bemax is already up 35% this week. It’s one way Saudi Arabia is expanding and diversifying its economy to prepare for post oil-boom times.

Sinosteel Regroups for Another Billion-Dollar Iron Bid

It’s often how a person acts, not what they say, that shapes your opinion of them.

The politician who promises to lower taxes? He’s too busy splurging on an electoral campaign. The fellow in the pub who tells you he’s “sober as a judge”? A judicial authority is rarely found sprawled upside-down under a bar stool, attempting to woo a disgusted member of the opposite sex.

Actions talk. Talking doesn’t always mean action.

As you saw yesterday, Murchison and Midwest look set to wed in corporate matrimony. But let’s consider the actions involved. How did China’s Sinosteel respond?

It went straight to the Foreign Investment Review Board.

Why?

To argue that it wouldn’t have to re-apply for approval, now that its target will probably become a new entity. There’s only one reason it would keep that option open. It plans to make another bid.

This time, the stakes have risen. Murchison just announced five-fold growth in its iron mineral resource. Add in Midwest’s resource. The company now controls over 600 million tonnes of iron, in various forms. It’s all quite close to important shipping ports.

To China, this means more iron under one roof. So it has popped down to the realty to see if this new house is for sale.

We’re surprised it found the time. Sinosteel has been very busy working on a stake in Fortescue (ASX:FMG) lately. The iron-hungry steel maker has been soliciting Harbinger Capital for its 8% stake in FMG. Fortescue leapt 7% yesterday. It’s now a AU$27 billion company.

We don’t need to spell this out. Sinosteel wants to own an Australian iron exporter, one way or another. We have a feeling it’ll get its way.

ABB Grain Adds 80% to Profits

ABB Grain (ASX:ABB) just unleashed some déjà vu upon us. A week ago AWB (ASX:AWB) announced a 90% boom in profit growth. Yesterday ABB did a good impersonation, revealing an 80% boom in earnings. The company’s share price added 8%.

Wasn’t the market expecting something along these lines? Grain prices soared earlier in the year. It’s been a good growing season. Maybe people are only just starting to wake up to the agricultural boom.

If that’s the case, you might be interested to know that Graincorp (ASX:GNC) is yet to announce any new profit guidance for this year. Maybe it’s next in line. The company expanded its grain marketing operations in 2006-07. And as you can see below, its share price hasn’t curved up in the recent past.

That’s probably because the stock is bidding for Ridley Corporation (ASX:RIC). The market may have overlooked this one.

If you’re not exposed to rising agricultural earnings yet, it might be time. And if none of the companies above suit you, we have two even better suggestions.

We know you might prefer to sample something before committing to it. Fair enough; we’re the same way. So we’ve twisted our boss’s arm a little. Diggers and Drillers is now offering a 3-month trial subscription. Take a look at the link for our top two picks in the Ag sector, plus all our currents “buys” in metals, coal, iron, oil and gas. If you don’t like what you see, no problems. It’s only a trial. The next issue comes out later today.

We’ll be looking at others soon. Until then…

Al Robinson
The Daily Reckoning Australia

P.S. to get The Daily Reckoning direct to your inbox sign up to our free e-mail newsletter or if you prefer to use RSS, subscribe to the Daily Reckoning RSS feed.

Source: Saudi Arabia Pours Oil Investment into Australia

Yesterday (Thursday) futures prices for that benchmark grade of crude oil hit the latest in a succession of record highs, punching through the $135-a-barrel mark on the New York Mercantile Exchange, before sliding back.

In other words, in only a single year, crude-oil prices have more than doubled, soaring 115% – and setting 27 separate new records along the way. And while a short-term correction may be in the offing – especially with fears of a U.S. recession ebbing – the reality is that oil prices are nowhere near the end of their run, meaning the United States is really an economic system that’s at the crossroads.

“The market is less worried about the economy and subprime problems,” Tim Speiss, head of the wealth-management arm of Eisner LLP, told MarketWatch.com. “But that’s near-sighted. If oil stays above $130 a barrel, that’s a very significant event and a lot of the sectors of the economy would have to be re-engineered.”

Commodities of all types are at or near all-time record highs. And the impact – on a global basis – has been as starting as it is far-reaching, affecting consumers at all income levels and in every market across the world.

Even so, here in the U.S. market, it’s the price of oil – and of gasoline – that continues to dominate the headlines. Like a junk-food junkie who’s constantly searching for a sugar fix, the U.S. economy is addicted to foreign oil. And because it’s not a habit we’re going to kick anytime soon, U.S. consumers will be forced to live with the heinous consequences.

Given that harsh reality, shrewd investors will look for ways to offset that largely unavoidable pain with some well-placed profit plays. Before we can do that, however, a look at the basics is necessary.

Oil Prices 101

Since 2005, global oil production has remained stagnant, but demand has increased exponentially. Even if American consumers are unwilling to pay $4 a gallon for gasoline, and U.S. demand plummets, global demand will continue to rise.

Eduardo Lopez, an analyst with the International Energy Agency, told The Independent that America’s role as the global oil-price arbiter – the United States consumes one out of every four barrels of oil used worldwide – is dwindling.

“Demand is coming from emerging markets. As long as the [United States] doesn’t collapse, it doesn’t really matter if the mature economies are slowing,” Lopez said.

While the IEA expects demand in industrialized countries to decline by 0.7% (about 300,000 barrels of oil per day) this year, the Paris-based group says oil consumption in the rest of the world will grow by 3.7% (1.4 million barrels a day).

The net increase is due chiefly to the rapid growth in China and India.

Fueling the Fast-Growing Economies of China and India

According to the China Petroleum and Chemical Industry Association (CPCIA), China’s apparent consumption of petroleum byproducts such as gasoline, diesel and kerosene rose 16.5% year-over-year in the first-quarter. Crude oil consumption jumped 8%.

China’s net imports totaled 44.95 million metric tons in the first quarter, up 15%, and net imports of oil products rose by 32% from a year ago, according to the Asian nation’s General Administration of Customs.

And now that the most powerful earthquake in 58 years has ravaged the country’s infrastructure – smashing roads, leveling refineries, and shutting down hydroelectric plants – China has been forced to supercharge its imports of diesel and jet fuel just to supply power generators and airports to help it accelerate the desperate rebuilding process.

Ultimately, the IEA sees China’s oil demand more than doubling to 16.5 million barrels a day by 2030.

But that’s nothing compared to other emerging hot spots, where demand is expected to rocket sevenfold during that same stretch.

Just look at India, another big country with a pedal-to-the-metal growth rate. That country is expected to overtake the United States, Japan, and China as the world’s leading net importer of oil by 2025.

In 1970-71, India was importing 11.66 metric tons of crude oil. By 2005-06, however, the imports had increased to 99.40 metric tons, the Economic Times reported. Since 1997-98, alone, petroleum imports have almost tripled. Nearly 76% of India’s domestic oil needs are met via imports.

And it’s really no wonder: India’s demand for oil is expected to grow by 8%-10% this year alone.

Together, China and India will account for 45% of the increase in global primary energy demand through 2030. The two countries’ net oil imports are expected to jump from 5.4 million barrels in 2006 to 20 million barrels a day in 2030, which could create a “supply crunch” as early as 2015 according to the IEA.

The Pending ‘Supply Crunch’

There’s no avoiding the fact that the world will one day run out of oil. In fact, the biggest field in the world, Saudi Arabia’s Ghawar field, is only a shadow of its former self. It was originally discovered in 1948. And since the 1970s, the oil field has required large-scale injections of seawater – a technique used to artificially pressurize an oil reserve that’s on the decline.

Ghawar isn’t the only spot where this seawater saga is playing out. As the biggest, most-accessible, and most-cost-efficient wells on the planet dry up, oil producers are struggling to replace them.

To do so, they’ve been forced to experiment with challenging and costly deep-sea drilling expeditions. Such heavy-hitters as Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM), BP PLC (BP), Total SA (TOT), Chevron Corp. (CVX), ConocoPhilips (COP), and Royal Dutch Shell PLC (RDS.A, RDS.B), will spend a record $98.7 billion this year on exploration and production, according to Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc. (LEH).

Exploration costs have more than quadrupled since 2000, as oil producers have been forced to take on more complex projects and the costs of both labor and materials have skyrocketed. In just the past eight years alone, the cost of finding and developing a barrel of crude oil soared from $4 to $18, Andrew Latham, vice president of exploration services at consulting firm Wood Mackenzie Ltd., told Bloomberg News.