The Dow rose 155 points on Friday. And today, stocks are rising in Asia. Oil is over $74. Gold rose $13 on Friday… to close at $954. And the dollar is killing us softly… sinking to $1.43 per euro on Friday.

Stocks and oil are at their highest levels so far this year. With such profits at hand people figure they don’t need the dollar. Investors run to the safety of the greenback when financial storms approach. But now… they think it will be clear sailing.

“Worlds bankers suggest rebound may be under way,” says a headline at the New York Times.

Is the world economy really recovering? Should you buy stocks now to take advantage of this new bull market?

You already know the answer, don’t you, dear reader.

After a fall comes a bounce. And along with the bounce come a lot of silly ideas. You see how it works? “Markets make opinions,” say the old timers on Wall Street. When stocks are going up investors find reasons why they are going up. Pretty soon, they’ve convinced themselves that they’ll go up forever.

But bounces do not last forever. They aren’t giant turtles… they’re moths. After a few months of flitting around bright lights, they dry up. When exactly this summer of winged love will end, we don’t know. September or October is our guess. But we have little doubt it will come to an end soon.

Ultimately, stock prices depend on earnings. People compare the rate of return they can get from stocks to what they can get from other investments. Rising earnings signal higher rates of return, so investors pay more.

During the great credit expansion of 1945-2007, businesses could anticipate, generally, rising earnings. People were buying more and more things on credit. In a national economy, businesses pay wages and then the employees use the wages to buy products. The wages are a ‘cost’ to the business… but they are also the source of business revenue. When sales come from credit, on the other hand, businesses have the revenue but no wage cost. Profits go up.

Now, the cycle has turned. Businesses still have the wage cost. But instead of using the money to buy things, the employee uses it to repay loans for purchases made last year or the year before. Now the business has the cost but not the revenue.

As they say in the economic textbooks: bummer.

The process of de-leveraging will be slow. Maybe 5 years. Maybe 15. Maybe 25. It will up and down… with high unemployment (businesses will cut their wage costs as sales fail to recover)… low prices (at least in real terms)… low profits… and slow growth, or none at all.

Is that bad? No, not at all. It’s good. Economies need to adjust to the new realities of the post-credit bubble world. It will take time. And with the world’s financial authorities fighting it every step of the way… it could take a LONG time. As we’ve explained in these Daily Reckonings, government is a profoundly conservative, parasite-protecting enterprise. It cannot draw forth the future – it has no idea what the future will be. Instead, all it can do is to try to recover the past. That’s the idea of the ‘recovery’… to try to coddle, protect and pay-off yesterday’s success stories. From Wall Street to welfare… governments attempt to prevent correction.

And more thoughts:

*** The Obama administration announced that it expects $9 trillion in deficits over the next 10 years. One of the great mysteries of our time is: where will the money come from? As we pointed out last week, even if every dollar of US savings is applied to the task, the feds will still be short. And if they make up the difference with funny money – from their quantitative easing scam – the Chinese vigilantes are likely to get cheesed off and dump their US Treasury bonds.

The evidence shows that the Chinese…and other Asians…are already trying to lighten up on their US debt holdings. This from the New York Times:

“Figures released by the Treasury Department this week indicated that China reduced its holdings of Treasury securities by $25 billion in June, the most China had ever sold in a month.

Monthly figures can be volatile, and can be revised, so it is risky to draw conclusions from one month’s data. In May, China increased its holdings by $38 billion, according to the Treasury figures.

“Nonetheless, the decline highlighted a fact… Asia’s appetite for Treasury securities is not growing as fast as it once did. That means the United States will have to turn to other buyers, including American citizens, who are now saving as they did not do during the boom years, to finance the deficits… In the first half of 2009, China and Hong Kong acquired only 9 percent of the more than $800 billion worth of Treasuries that were sold.

“ Japan, which was replaced by China as the largest foreign holder of Treasuries last year, has been a larger buyer this year, taking up 11 percent of the new supply of Treasuries.

“Ownership of US Treasuries by China, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand — since 1994 — rose to 25 percent, from less than 8 percent. Since then, as budget deficits in the United States grew, the share has fluctuated within a narrow range. In June, it was 24.7 percent.”

If Asians don’t finance US debts, who will? We don’t know… But the fewer bonds Asians buy… the more they are bought with funny money by the Fed. And the more the Fed buys with funny money the fewer Asians want to buy with real money.

How will this end? Badly…we keep saying. There is no way out. Either the feds cease spending more than they can raise honestly, by taxation and reasonable borrowing. Or, the system runs into chronic, mega deficits…like the chronic deficits in the private sector during the bubble years. Then, it blows up.

That is why we caution readers against the dollar and against Treasuries. Most likely, they will both go up this autumn…as investors flee to safety from the next market downturn. But the chances of them blowing up completely are too great. That’s why we stick with gold – even though we would not at all be surprised by a period of weakness in the gold market.

*** On Friday night, we went to a ‘dinner in white’ at a nearby chateau. It was a jolly affair, at an ancient chateau entirely surrounded by a moat.

We set up our table, alongside the others. We gathered for drinks. We saw old friends. And then we prepared for dinner.

Why “white?” The dinner marks the occasion of the Assumption of the Virgin. It’s held each year in this rural area of France. Everyone brings a full dinner service – table, chairs, candles, etc. etc. Then, after setting up outside, under the stars… there’s a twist. Couples switch around so that your editor ends up having dinner with a woman to whom he is not married.

Having dinner with someone else’s wife can be a delight. At least, you have nothing to argue about. But how much of a delight it is depends entirely – or perhaps mostly – on chance.

In our case, we were trebly lucky. In front of us was a charming woman who turned out to be a relative of many people we already knew. So we kept up a lively conversation about cousins, uncles, aunts… family tragedies… and upcoming marriages. On our right, was a cute woman with a bright smile and a friendly manner. On our left, was another charming woman with a shrewd, fast wit.

Time passed quickly. We crossed swords with the woman on our left – over education policies. We chatted with the woman in front of us – about family, the weather, local trends, food and whatever. We flirted with the woman on our right:

“Do you come to these dinners often,” we asked.

“About as often as you do,” came the reply, “once a year.”

“Well, the dinners suit you. You look very nice in white.”

“Thanks… but I really don’t have any choice. It’s a ‘dinner in white,’ after all. If I had a choice, I’d wear black.”

“Why… because you have a black, cruel heart? Or is it because you are in a sad mood? I hope not. And if so, perhaps I can cheer you up by telling you joke. How many Belgians does it take to change a lightbulb?”

“I’ve heard that one.”

“Then why does the guy from Belgium go to sleep with one full glass of water next to his bed and one empty glass?”

“I don’t know… why?”

“Because he never knows if he’ll be thirsty or not when he wakes up in the night.”

“Oh…”

Source: The Future Will Come

“No rally can be sustained with yields and P/Es so poorly valued,” says underground investor Chris Weber, writing for DailyWealth. Chris is a very special kind of investor. When he was 16 years old, he turned just $650 (saved from his paper route) into $1.8 million through a series of remarkably insightful investments. So naturally we’re all ears when Chris gives his opinion on the direction of the market.

Chris is bearish on US stocks. (He’s mainly in cash and precious metals.) Why? Because there’s no value in the US stock market.

As of the end of July, the dividend yield on the S&P 500 has fallen to only 2.13%. When the rally began in March, the yield was over 3.5%. That is a huge fall in a short time.

Then, as stock prices have soared, earnings of companies have just not kept pace. In many cases, they are down sharply. This imbalance in price to earnings is shown in the weird spike in the P/E ratio on the S&P 500. It is now up to 127 times annual earnings, up from less than 20 times earnings at the rally’s start in March.

In other words, the dividend yield and the P/Es were not what you see at real bottoms. In really low markets, investors are shaken so much that years are required for them to regain bullishness.

Instead, I think what we’ve been seeing are the types of violent rallies within bear markets we saw throughout both the 1930s and the 60s-early 70s.

So once again, I’m just watching the stock markets. My position is that if the Dow Industrials and Transports can both better their previous record highs that they reached back in the second half of 2007, then I’ll be interested and ready to say that we are really off to the races again.

What I think is more likely is a repeat of the period of 1966 to 1975, where we’ll see a series of rallies within a bear market. In other words, this will be an easy time to lose money, and a hard time to make it.

Porter Stansberry has another take on stocks. He reckons we’re in the early stages of a “massive inflation.” Porter’s argument is simple. As long as the government keeps printing up trillions of dollars a year and holding short-term rates at nearly 0%, financial stocks are going to rise… And as long as financial stocks rise, the rest of market will follow.

Financial stocks are on a roll, as you can plainly see from the nearby chart of the financial sector ETF (XLF). Now, ask yourself a very simple question: Are investors buying financials because of their strong balance sheets and smart management or are they buying because they know that the government intends to keep pumping money into these boated behemoths?

Say what you like, US stocks are rising. All we know is we don’t like it one little bit. And we wouldn’t touch stocks knowing what we do about the market. As Chris Weber says, “This will be an easy time to lose money, and a hard time to make it.” Amen to that.

So today we turn away from the markets and focus on something more important: basic investment principles. As Alexander Green, investment director of The Oxford Club, puts it over at InvestmentU.com, “It’s not uncommon to run into investors who are knee deep in option trading, currencies, short selling, or sophisticated arbitrage strategies without mastering – or even understanding – basic investment principles.”

Here’s what Alex believes are the six factors that determine the value of your portfolio’s. Only one of these six factors is beyond your control: your assets’ annual compounded return. That means it only makes sense to focus on the other five.

1. The amount of money you save. To put it bluntly you have to start by maximizing your income, minimizing your outgoing and paying yourself first. Why? Because expenses always rise to meet the income available. As soon as you get a raise or a higher paying job, you’ll find that you need a new car, a bigger house, better furniture and a new set of Callaway irons. But you have to draw the line somewhere. You can’t save a pittance and expect your portfolio to perform miracles each year.

2. The length of time your money compounds. The sooner you start investing the better. And the longer you leave it alone the better. If you start too late – or raid your portfolio to redo the kitchen or take the kids to Disney – you’re going to have a lot of catching up to do down the road. The old chestnut is true: Don’t touch your capital. It’s like eating your seed corn.

3. Your asset allocation. Studies consistently show that how you divide your portfolio among non-correlated assets – stocks, bonds, real estate investment trusts, precious metals, etc. – determines 90% of your portfolio’s long-term return. (The rest is due to security selection.) If you’re too conservative – or too aggressive to stick with your program – you simply won’t meet your goals.

4. Your assets’ annual return. This, of course, is the great unknown. Not even Warren Buffett or Ben Bernanke can say what their portfolio will return each year. But the better your security selection and asset allocation decisions, the higher your annual compounded returns.

5. What you pay in expenses. Don’t be oblivious to what all those financial intermediaries are charging you. You can sacrifice far too much in commissions, bid/ask spreads, wrap fees, management expenses and other costs. All things being equal, the lower your expenses the higher your net returns.

6. How much you pay in taxes. Too many investors are oblivious to the tax ramifications of their investment moves. When possible, put your high-yielding investments in your tax-deferred accounts and your tax-efficient funds and individual stocks in your non-retirement accounts. (I call this your asset location strategy.) Hold positions 12 months or more to qualify for the lower long-term capital gains tax rate. Offset your capital gains with capital losses if possible.

You see what most investors don’t understand (and probably never will) is that market timing and stock picking make up only a small part of serious wealth building. It’s a secret the “ultra wealthy” have known for a long time. And they spend a lot of time and money making sure these six factors are right (and others, too, that would be too complicated to explain here). It’s how they hold onto their wealth for generations.

It’s actually what we’ve been working on while here in France. Along with my dad and your Notes co-editor, Chris Hunter, we’ve been researching these wealth preservation secrets. And we’ve discovered that wealthy families nearly always have something called a “family office.”

Most of these require massive amounts of cash to join. (One group in London my dad went to talk to was looking for a $200 million minimum!) So that’s why we decided to set up Bonner & Partners Family Office. It puts all of the money management secrets of the ultra wealthy to work… without the massive price tag.

Partners will enjoy the following benefits:

Access to what my family is doing with its money. Over the years we’ve spent literally hundreds of thousands of dollars on high-level wealth management advice. It’s been distilled into our family portfolio, which partners will have full access to.

Twice-daily market advice from full-time money manager Simon Mellon. The family has spent a lot of money, and considerable time, finding the right investment director for the family office. Simon has a resume as long as your arm. And his insight into the market is the kind that comes only with years in the trenches in New York and London.

Full-time tax planning advice from Raife Nueman. Raife went to university with your editor at St John’s College. And he’s one of the brightest attorneys we ever come across. (He has been elbow deep in the US tax code over the past two months, and he’s identified a way to drastically reduce your tax spend – to as much as 0% in some cases.)

Access to all of Agora trading advice and investment research. Family office partners will have full access to the entire daily output of Agora, the family publishing company. This amounts to 34 trading and investment research services. (A total of over $97,000 worth of subscription services a year.)

We will be sending out an invitation to join us as a family office partner this week. As a Notes reader, you can join the invitation list early by sending an email to info@contrarianprofits.com. Just make sure to put “Family Office” in the subject line so our staff will be able to quickly add you to the list before the invitation goes out…