Major U.S. stock indexes <.DJI> <.SPX> <.IXIC> were down nearly 2 percent in afternoon U.S. trading as investors fretted that chatter from hedge funds on a bank failure could prove accurate.

The decline came despite upbeat economic news from the United States and euro zone as well as a stabilization in Chinese shares after a rout on Monday.

The hedge fund talk “is a huge driver” of currency markets, said Dan Cook, senior market analyst at IG Markets Inc in Chicago. “When you have data like we had but the Dow drops, people are running for that safe haven.”

In midafternoon trading in New York the dollar index <.DXY>, which tracks a basket of six major currencies, was up 0.8 percent at 78.786, rebounding from a session low of 77.944, according to Reuters data.

The dollar was little changed against the yen at 93.01 yen, slightly above Monday’s seven-week low of 92.53, according to Reuters data.

But the yen was up 0.9 percent against the Canadian dollar , 0.7 percent against the Swiss franc , 0.8 percent against the euro and 0.8 percent against the pound .

The euro was down 0.9 percent against the dollar at $1.4205 , well below a session high of $1.4377 .

WHAT RECESSION?

The U.S. manufacturing sector expanded in August for the first time in more than a year and a half. The Institute for Supply Management’s index of national factory activity rose to 52.9 from 48.9 in July. For more see

Separate data showed pending sales of previously owned U.S. homes raced to a two-year high in July, further evidence the housing market was on a steady recovery path.

“Clearly, the U.S. data is surprising to the upside,” said Jack Iles, senior portfolio manager who helps manage $2.5 billion assets at MFC Global Investment Management in Boston.

But despite a batch of upbeat U.S. economic numbers, major currencies remained in ranges as investors continued to debate about the outlook for the global economy, analysts said.

“At the end of the day, the market is still in wait-and-see mode,” said Firas Askari, head of currency trading at BMO Capital Markets in Toronto. “We’re getting jostled around by every piece of data that comes out and I don’t think there’s a consensus that this economy has legs.”

Data released earlier also showed euro zone purchasing managers’ index (PMI) rose to 48.2 in August against forecasts for a 47.9 reading while German unemployment unexpectedly fell in August.

The data comes before a European Central Bank policy meeting on Thursday widely expected to keep benchmark rates steady at a historic low of 1 percent, with the focus on policymakers’ outlook on the economy.

Sterling erased early gains against the dollar and the euro after an unexpected dip in UK manufacturing in August, stoking concerns about the pace of recovery in the British economy.

Sterling was down 0.9 percent at $1.6135 , after touching a six-week low, and was little changed against the euro at 88.02 pence .

In other trading, the Australian dollar fell 2.1 percent to US$0.8265. The Reserve Bank of Australia, holding its cash rate at 3.0 percent as expected, said the current low level of rates was appropriate, countering speculation it would adopt an explicit tightening bias.

Sept 1 (Reuters)

Our forecast today: The government and mainstream media will soon be calling the end of the recession. Leading this feeble cause is the latest ISM manufacturing index, probably the most powerful argument for recovery we’ve seen yet:

This morning, the ISM said its gauge of manufacturing activity had risen to 52.9 in August – out of contraction for the first time since the recession began and the highest score since June 2007. Of course, things are a bit different now, but over the last 60 years, when the manufacturing sector returns to growth, the recession has already ended. That prospect is enhanced by the capacity utilization data we mentioned earlier this month — another recession-ending indicator now glowing green.
What’s more, pending home sales rose 3.2% in July, the National Association of Realtors also reported. With an index score of 97.6, that’s a 12% rise from this time last year, the highest level in two years and the sixth straight month of improving pending sales conditions.
Factor all that in with rising consumer sentiment, home price and stock indexes and we suspect now is around the time when the government will eventually declare the recession ended… which will make way for all kinds of shelved legislation and the political agendas that popularized the current administration in the first place. Then there’s that whole “double dip” dilemma… but we’ll save that for another five minutes.
Yesterday’s gloom from China helped push U.S. stocks down. The S&P 500 fell 0.8%. Today looks like it’ll be even worse. The market got a little bump from the manufacturing and housing data this morning, but as we write, traders are “selling the news” – big time. The S&P had fallen 2% by lunchtime.
“Cyclical equities, commodities and commodity currencies have already moved,” notes our macro adviser Rob Parenteau, “first to reflect the end of the Armageddon bet back in March, and then to reflect the end of the recession bet in July. We suspect investors will seize on the mounting evidence of an economic recovery to redouble their efforts to increase their positions in these asset classes.

“We will be surprised if 10-year Treasury yields do not break 4% by mid-October as this recognition spreads, and we suspect Chairman Bernanke, with the president’s nod for another term at the Fed, will be forced to start talking about normalizing the fed funds rate in Q4 (before actually doing something about it in Q1 2010) if he wishes to keep Treasury bond investors from heading for the hills. A Fed promising a near-zero fed funds rate from here to eternity will surely look far from appetizing to Treasury bond investors if a 4% real GDP growth environment unfolds.”

Wait, 4% GDP growth?

“If we were to naively use the experience of all the recessions of the post-World War II period as a guide, the nearly 4% peak-to-trough decline in real GDP to date in this recession would be the prelude to a first-year recovery growth rate close to 8.5%. This, of course, is unthinkable given the current mess. But if we got only half of that historically normal bounce — which we believe is the correct handicap, given the private sector deleveraging under way — the resulting 4%-plus real GDP growth over the next year would prove nearly twice the current 2-2.25% consensus expectation. Chairman Ben might just want to stick around for that.”

A better life through proven economic thought – that’s the Richebacher Society credo, which Rob has done a fine job carrying on. Find out how you can join their exclusive ranks here.
It’s worth noting, despite yesterday’s sell-off, the S&P ended the month up 3.4%. That spells a 51% shot since March, the best six-month run since 1938. Of course, the last thing you’d want to do now is take some profits… after the most notable winning streak in our lifetimes, the S&P will likely rise another 50%. It’ll probably go up forever.
China is celebrating a stronger manufacturing sector today, too. Its purchasing managers index (like our ISM) rose from 53.3 to 54 in August, signaling its sixth straight month of expansion and the best score in over a year. But is the China boom just a product of too much easy money? It’s starting to seem so… we’ll keep an eye on it.
Here’s another story fanning the economic recovery’s flames:The much-delayed Boeing 787 Dreamliner might finally take flight this year. Late last week, Boeing said that its long saga of delays and frustrations with the much-hyped jet are coming to an end. The first Dreamliner is now on track to leave terra firma by the end of the year, and the jet will actually be delivered to various international airways by the end of 2010.

Just how late is the Dreamliner? Japanese airliner All Nippon will get the first in 2010… since they were originally promised delivery by the start of the Beijing Olympics.

“My next buy recommendation is based on some of the historic changes happening in air transportation,” notes Chris Mayer, who chronicled the Dreamliner saga in the latest Capital & Crisis alert. “One of the key drivers of this change is what I call the Silk Roads of the sky. The aerospace industry has a $6 trillion backlog for new aircraft — which will double the global fleet over the next 20 years.

“In large measure, new and booming trade routes will link all kinds of cities and markets flung all over God’s green footstool. There are hundreds of new airports planned and thousands of new planes that will connect China to Africa to the Middle East and more.

“The thing about the new aircraft is that they are titanium intensive. Titanium is a silvery, lustrous metal that is corrosion resistant and has the highest strength-to-weight ratio of any metal. Aircraft manufacturers love titanium, especially now that the market has crushed the price of titanium, along with everything else.

“That creates some space for us to buy a quality operator now. Titanium prices are way down. Sentiment is terrible, with most analysts only lukewarm to the idea. Most of the near-term news is bad. That gives us a great price to get in on a promising long-term story. Of course, this is already in the process of changing, thanks to the Dreamliner announcement.”

So what’s the best play on this trend? Check out your latest Capital & Crisis alert.
The Canadian economy contracted more than anticipated in the second quarter, the Canadian government admitted today. GDP contracted 3.4% in the period, compared to the 3% Canadian traders anticipated. The first-quarter GDP decline was also revised downward to 6.1% — the worst annualized drop on records dating back to 1961.
“I told you so!” Byron King exclaimed to us in a one-line e-mail sent very early this morning. He’s really not the shouting/gloating type, so we quickly clicked the link he sent along and saw this, the headline of today’s New York Times business section:

“China Tightens Grip on Rare Minerals”

The Old Gray Lady is “breaking news” today on China’s rapidly increasing dominance of rare earth metals… those bottom of the periodic table elements crucial to producing just about every high-tech gadget. The NYT noted that the Chinese government is just shy of cornering the market of rare earths, and that its export quotas have been shrinking every year, with this year on track to be the smallest yet.

Readers of The 5 or Byron’s Energy & Scarcity Investor will likely yawn and turn the page… they have been reading about this since March 2008.

“There are more than a few stock pushers out there,” notes Byron, “explaining to people how to ‘profit from the squeeze in rare earths.’ But there’s really only ONE decent publicly traded company that will give you a long-term return in rare earths.”

That company is in the Energy & Scarcity Investor portfolio. Learn about it here.
Speaking of rare metals, gold’s been keeping an awfully low profile lately. Over the past 30 days, the spot price has kept to a $35 range, bouncing mostly between $940-955. The spot price is in the higher end of that paradigm today, at $952 an ounce.
The positive manufacturing numbers stopped the oil sell-off today. After a nearly $3 fall yesterday, light, sweet crude arrested its fall at $69 a barrel.
The dollar is just a bit higher. Up a few tenths of a point, to 78.2, the dollar index is still less than a point above its 2009 low.
“Inflation or deflation?” a reader asks, referring to Bill Bonner’s forecast that betting on inflation feels too easy. “I can tell you this…

“I live on a very strict budget, and I am not stretching on this statement. In the last 18-24 months, my bills have gone up considerably. I will give you some examples. Thirty-nine ounces of Maxwell House Coffee was about $5.50 a year ago, and today it comes in a smaller (34.5 oz.) package for about $8.00. WOW! A 5 lb. bag of sugar was around $1.99. Now it is $2.29. Dry cereal used to come in a larger package also, and went from $2.00 a box to a whopping $2.39. Soft drinks: A six-pack of 24 oz. bottles was $3.00 and NOW it is an unbelievable $4.29! Dog food from $8.99 to $10.99.

“My cable bill has gone up two or three times in the last two years (includes Internet and TV). My electric bill has gone up just a little.

“What went down? My homeowners insurance and natural gas bills

“The problem here is that the difference between what has increased in price and what has decreased still leaves me in the hole. In other words, after all the bills are paid, I am paying MORE this year!”

Uncle Sam responds: That’s simply not possible, madam. Consumer price inflation is down 2.1% over the last year, the largest decline since 1950. If people like you were right, it would undermine our whole methodology. There must be something wrong with your budget.
“Given the data from the Rasmussen poll you mentioned,” a reader writes of Rasmussen’s great “throw the bums out” poll, “I guess if there were an all-or-nothing choice when people voted we might finally make some progress in fixing Congress. I think the data are misleading, though, since polls have shown these types of numbers in the past, but of course, when it gets right down to it, people re-elect their local pork provider (over 90% of incumbents win in Congress).

“One poll I saw probably 10 years ago asked if Congress was corrupt, and 90% replied yes, but when asked about their own local rep, people said he was one of the few good politicians. This is the problem: All these guys are just horse-traders for their local projects, many of which we don’t need, especially with trillion-dollar deficits staring us in the face for the foreseeable future. Who knows, as the fallout from the never ending bailout programs recedes, perhaps people will start voting some of these idiots out of office — Rep. Rangel, with his forgotten income and taxes, might not be the best guy to run the Ways and Means Committee for starters. Keep up the great work.”

The 5: Thanks, it’s our pleasure.

Sourc: Manufacturing Rebound, A Contrarian Play, Rare Earths and More!

Why $21.22 Is Your Inflation Protection Level

Question is… has the bear market rally over the past two weeks been solid enough to generate new buy signals? Well, yes and no…

History Repeating?

While some indexes did establish buy signals, a number of them weren’t able to reach their optimum downside targets. While this is can sometimes create false signals, the bigger picture indicates that the signals are probably valid.

What is much more certain, however, is that the indexes are tracing out a larger consolidation pattern. That movement could mean that the Nasdaq indexes will test their January (and possibly even November) highs before any serious selling resumes.

Long-term consolidation patterns are nothing new for stock indexes. In fact, the current pattern on the S&P bears some striking similarities to the larger one that ended in 2002 – as you can see on the monthly chart below…

The main two similarities that jump out between these two bear market consolidation patterns is that…

• The selloffs began from almost the same levels
• Until March, the number of points lost was practically identical

The key difference between the two time periods, though, is that the 2000-2002 bear market lasted over 2½ years, while the current bear market is only in its 18^th month.

This means that even amid a strong rally at the moment, investors should be very wary about calling this the bottom and jumping back in with a vengeance. Bear market rallies often lure investors back to the party with quick, sharp upward moves… only to run out of steam and head back down.

Practice Patience During March Madness

So don’t expect a new bull market to start here. Before the five-year bull market that followed the last bear market, the indexes went through an eight-month consolidation pattern. And even if we use the November low as the start of the consolidation pattern, this one has only lasted four months.

In addition, when we see steep declines – as we have done recently – it usually requires a longer consolidation period while time plays catch up with price.

In 2003, we didn’t know that the market’s consolidation pattern was complete until weekly buy signals were triggered. And right now, it’s just too early to even consider calculating where the S&P 500 would trigger a weekly buy signal.

What we can say, though, is that since the Nasdaq 100 didn’t violate its November low, it would have to get up to at least 1,387 points just to set up a weekly buy signal.

Fortunately, we can be more definitive with this week’s sector…

Your Inflation Buzz-Phrase: “Trillion-Dollar Bailout”

Last week, the Federal Reserve announced that will buy $1.2 trillion worth of government bonds, which will then be pumped into the U.S. economy,

It wasn’t just stocks that loved the news. Commodities did, too. A lot! For example, gold prices shot $70 higher from Wednesday’s low. And most other dollar-denominated commodities were higher by the end of the week, alongside foreign currencies.

Hot on the heels of that strategy, the government revealed its own trillion-dollar move today. The “Public-Private Investment Program” will buy $1 trillion worth of so-called “toxic assets” in order to shore up U.S. banks’ sagging balance sheets.

Stocks may love all this trillion-dollar bailout news – in the short-term. But over the longer-term, most analysts agree that we’ll see something else rise soon: Inflation. Hardly surprising, with the U.S. mint continuing to run the presses at a rapid clip.

If we do indeed see that result, it means one thing: The value of the U.S. dollar has nowhere to go but down. And that will consequently force commodity prices higher.

Take a look at the daily chart of the PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (NYSE: DBC)…

As you can see, DBC closed above its 50-day moving average (marked in red) – the day before the Fed’s $1.2 trillion announcement. It then closed higher for the rest of last week.

The important number is $21.22 – the level it needs to close above in order to trigger a daily buy signal. If it can do that, it’s a very good area from which investors can buy into the broad commodities sector on pullbacks – something that would provide a good hedge against inflation, as well as price appreciation.

I suggest using a couple of closes below the trendline (blue) as a stop loss.

Source: How to Protect Your Portfolio from Inflation

He goes on to say, “But this talk will shift soon to the ‘now what’ questions of what to buy when we do reach that magical point.” Here Scott discusses the Mutual Fund’s cousin, the ETF, and how to take advantage of investing in one.

Many will shun individual stocks for the safety of mutual funds. And with the explosion of index funds, we’ve never had a larger variety of options to help us diversify. These index funds are designed to yield a return equal to that of a particular index. They allow you to purchase a variety of assets as a low-cost, passive-investment strategy. And there are a number of indexes that specify sectors, stock indexes and international markets.

It’s a powerful strategy that allows you to slice and dice the global economy in a risk-managed approach. But we don’t like to stop simply at reducing risk and diversification.

There’s another cousin to the mutual fund and index fund families that many investors have heard of but haven’t taken advantage of. If you own mutual funds, indexed or otherwise, you need to know if using exchange-traded funds (ETFs) makes more sense for you. Here’s what you need to know about ETFs, the close relative to your mutual funds…

Exchange-Traded Funds – Index Mutual Funds on Steroids

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) were first introduced in 1993, and are based on index mutual funds. They use similar principles, but have fewer management and transaction costs associated with them.

Unlike mutual funds, which can be bought or sold only at the end of the day when NAV is calculated, you can trade ETFs throughout the day, just like a share of stock.

• Exchange-Traded Funds are a portfolio of shares that can be bought of sold as a single unit.
• You own a proportionate amount of the shares held, with some ETFs even allowing transfers-in-kind.
• They can range from portfolios that track broad global market indexes all the way down to very narrow industry indexes.
• Exchange-Traded Funds are becoming a preferred way for investors to get all of a mutual fund’s benefits, with none of the downsides.

Think of ETFs as mutual funds on steroids.

Exchange-Traded Funds Becoming More Popular

While exchange-traded funds are becoming more popular by the day, they weren’t always so highly regarded. In fact, the creator of The Vanguard 500 Index Fund was against them and vigorously attacked the possibility of their success. In the end, John Bogle ended up adding a whole series of ETFs to the Vanguard family.

ETF investments quickly competed against indexed mutual funds. By early 2007, over $400 billion was invested in over 300 ETFs in three general classes:

• Broad U.S. market indexes,
• Narrow industry or “sector” portfolios,
• And international indexes.

The first ETF, like the first indexed mutual fund, matched the S&P 500 index and was given the symbol SPDR for Standard and Poor’s Depository Receipt. Many know it by its nickname, the “spider.”

Spiders spawned many new exchange-traded fund products like “Diamonds” that are based on the Dow Jones Industrial Index DJIA, Qubes based on the Nasdaq 100 index, and WEBS based on the World Equity Benchmark Shares of a portfolio of foreign stock market indexes.

The Advantages of Exchange-Traded Funds Over Indexed Funds

A big advantage of an exchange-traded funds over a conventional index fund is that they trade continuously throughout the day. You can buy and sell ETF shares just like a share of stock, while with an indexed mutual fund – where the net asset value is quoted – you have to place an order to buy or sell but that doesn’t transact until after the market.

This can be frustrating if your technical analysis indicates a buy or sell trigger at some point during a trading session but the market moves too far for you to take advantage of it by the end of the trading day.

And unlike mutual funds, exchange traded funds can be sold short of purchased on margin like a share of stock.

When you analyze these factors in light of the fact that options also trade on exchange-traded funds you can place positions in the general market, global market, or industry sectors, where you can:

• Employ protective hedges with puts or calls on your long or short ETF portfolio.
• Use combined buy-write options strategies where you collect premium from the short sell of an option to compensate for the cost the long options – bull and bear spreads, calendar spreads, diagonal spreads, butterflies, iron condors and so on, are all available to you trading ETFs but NOT with indexed mutual funds.

Exchange-traded funds also have tax advantages over mutual funds:

• When large numbers of mutual fund investors redeeming their shares – but you don’t – the fund has to sell securities to meet the redemptions. This creates a capital gains tax that is passed on to the remaining shareholders.
• Which means you end up paying the other guy’s tax obligation!
• In an exchange-traded fund, when somebody else sells, they have to pay the tax, not you.
• And when very large trades redeem their positions in the ETF, the transactions is settled with shares of stock in the underlying portfolio – not triggering a stock sale by the fund sponsor and no bogus tax bill to you.

Using Exchange-Traded Funds: How to Put Your Index Mutual Fund on Steroids

The losses among banks, insurers and money managers may spark the next round of writedowns on CDOs after $660 billion in subprime-related losses. They may force lenders to post more reserves against losses after governments worldwide announced $3 trillion in financial-industry rescue packages since last month, according to Barclays Capital.

– Meanwhile, Reuters reports that U.S. banks will need more $700 billion in government cash injections to stay afloat because “banks cannot predict how many of their loans will sour because they do not know how much the economy will shrink, and forecasts of their future losses would only spook investors.”

– The numbers are certainly worrying:

By the numbers, the outlook for banks is troubling. U.S. commercial banks had about $1 trillion of capital as of the end of the second quarter.

That may sound like a lot, but Alpert estimates that banks globally could have a total of $1.25 trillion to $1.5 trillion of writedowns and losses from mortgages, of which perhaps $600 billion have already been recorded.

– Earnings season is upon us. Investors are reacting to the prospect of corporate losses. This from MarketWatch:

U.S. stock futures pointed to a second straight drop on Wednesday on concerns for earnings in a rocky economy, though Apple looked set to buck the trend after the consumer electronics giant was able to sell far more iPhones than expected.

S&P 500 futures fell 20.1 points to 939.20 and Dow industrial futures tumbled 166 points. Futures on the tech-concentrated Nasdaq 100 fell a more modest 15.5 points to 1,277.00.

– Global stock indexes also fell. This from Bloomberg:

The MSCI World Index lost 2.9 percent to 944.07 at 12:02 p.m. in London. The index has lost 40 percent this year and oil has tumbled more than 50 percent from its peak in July as concern deepened government bailouts to save the global banking system won’t avert a recession.

– In the currency markets, the British pound hit a five-year low against the dollar. The euro plumbed a 20-month low against the buck.

– Crude oil prices fell below $70 a barrel on growing fears of a global economic slowdown. OPEC’s scheduled meeting on Friday to discuss output cuts has so far failed to stem oil’s slide.

– A lot of investors are calling a bottom — at least a tentative bottom — in stocks.

– Addison Wiggan and Ian Mathias in The 5 Min. Forecast note that Jeremy Grantham, self-proclaimed “perma-bear” is turning bullish.

Grantham says the time has come for “hesitant and careful buying” of equities. Grantham, who also correctly called a global bubble among all asset classes last year, told his $120 billion worth of clients that this is the quarter to start buying.

“On Oct. 10, we can say that, with the S&P at 900, stocks are cheap in the U.S. and cheaper still overseas. We will, therefore, be steady buyers at these prices. Not necessarily rapid buyers — in fact, probably not — but steady buyers…

“History warns, though, that new lows are more likely than not.

“Fixed income has wide areas of very attractive, aberrant pricing. The dollar and the yen look OK for now, but the pound does not. Don’t worry at all about inflation. We can all save up our worries there for a couple of years from now and then really worry!

“Commodities may have big rallies, but the fundamentals of the next 18 months should wear them down to new two-year lows. As for us in asset allocation, we have made our choice: hesitant and careful buying at these prices and lower.”