Porter Stansberry explains the forces behind the current rally The Daily Crux

America is running out of rope The Market Ticker

The world financial system’s Achilles’ heel The Daily Reckoning

Roubini on a U shaped recovery Naked Capitalism

Larry Flynt calls for a national strike The Huffington Post

Look for an X shaped recovery Real Clear Markets

The risk of double dip recession rising Financial Times

What the stress tests didn’t predict NYT

This champagne-cork-popping performance obscures a few trends that should be worrisome to the celebrants. First, the S&P 500 has gained no ground whatsoever since May 8, the first trading day after the Federal Reserve triumphantly announced the results of its banking sector “stress tests.” Second, the BKX Index of financial stocks has DROPPED more than 16% since May 8. (As we have noted in prior editions of the Rude Awakening, the finance sector has been leading the overall stock market – both to the upside and downside – for the better part of four years. So the sluggish recent performance of the BKX Index is probably not a “nothing.”) Lastly, most gauges of investor sentiment – like the VIX Index of option volatilities – are flashing readings of extreme investor optimism. Typically, as contrary indicators, such readings presage a market selloff.

But even if we were oblivious to all of these “inside baseball” stock market indicators, we would find plenty of reasons to worry about the near-term prospects of the US stock market.

Yesterday’s headlines, alone, offered ample evidence that something is rotten in the state of the U.S. economy:

For starters, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency announced a troubling jump in “prime mortgage” delinquencies during the first quarter. Secondly, the S&P/Case-Shiller Index of home prices continued to slide, both year-over-year and month-over-month. (But the rate of decline is slowing which, we are told, means that the housing market is “bottoming.” Maybe yes, maybe no. We been hearing these pronouncements almost every month since the housing market peaked in 2006). Lastly, the Conference Board disclosed that consumer’s are feeling blue once again. Consumer sentiment dropped sharply from the prior month.

It’s true that much of the economic data flying across the newswires are less bad than before. But they are not good in any absolute sense of the word. Economic distress is still ascendant from coast to coast, with very few exceptions. The only other ascendant trend is self-delusion.

In yesterday’s edition of the Rude Awakening, we examined the adulation and success the “big men” in America are currently enjoying…and we postulated that the very existence of this adulation indicates that the crisis is far from over. But maybe this analysis of ours is too wacky and unscientific for most Rude readers. So let’s take a hard look at the hard lives America’s little men (and women) are enduring.

A “little man,” loosely defined, is any worker in the United States who does not appear among the “Friends” on former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson’s Facebook page. A secondary definition of “little man” would be any individual without Ben Bernanke’s cell phone number in his “Fave 5,” and/or any individual without a direct line of credit from the Federal Reserve.

“Everywhere one looks these days,” we observed in yesterday’s Rude Awakening, “the big men are looking pretty darn smart. Meanwhile, the little men are suffering like never before.”

In what Sarah Baxter of “The Sunday Times” of London calls a “Mancession,” American males are suffering a disproportionate share of financial distress. “The economic crisis is sweeping away men’s jobs at a faster rate than those of women in America,” Baxter relates, “heralding the onset of a so-called ‘mancession.’” The Wall Street Journal’s, Mark Penn, dubs the growing ranks of unemployed males, “GLBs” (Guys Left Behind), and suggests their sufferings bode ill for the future of the American economy.

Picking up on the observations of Baxter and Penn, the Financial Times remarks:

“Men have lost almost 80% of the 5.1 million jobs that have disappeared in the US since the recession started. This is a dramatic reversal of the trend over the past few years, when the rates of male and female unemployment barely differed.”

This curious statistic may contain valuable a macroeconomic insight. Specifically, men are losing jobs because America’s metal-bending industries are atrophying.

“Men have been disproportionately hurt,” the Financial Times explains, “because they dominate those industries that have been crushed: nine in every 10 construction workers are male, as are seven in every 10 manufacturing workers. These two sectors alone have lost almost 2.5 million jobs. Women, in contrast, tend to hold more cyclically stable jobs and make up 75% of the most insulated sectors of all: education and health care.”

“The widening gap between male and female joblessness means many US families are solely reliant on the income the woman brings in,” the Financial Times concludes. This widening gap also means that America’s economy is becoming dangerously reliant on service and finance industries, rather than manufacturing industries.

To be sure, a paycheck is a paycheck, no matter whether a “Ms.” or a “Mr.” is cashing it…and a pink slip is a pink slip, no matter which gender is receiving it. But that’s not the whole picture. If the service-sector “Ms.” is cashing her paycheck, while the manufacturing-sector “Mr.” is receiving his pink slip, trouble is not far behind.

This is not a male-female thing; it is a national prosperity thing. Large economies cannot live on service industries alone. And large economies do not “recover” while their manufacturing industries are contracting. So, no, the U.S. economy is NOT recovering, no matter how many folks wish it were so.

Even if we look at the recent economic data through gender-neutral spectacles, we see a picture of national distress, not national recovery. We see soaring long-term unemployment, coupled with a subsistence-level consumer spending.

America’s “headline” unemployment rate is 9.4%, which is pretty darn bad. But America’s actual unemployment rate is more like 16%, which is a horrific. The chart below tracks the combined percentages of American workers who are: 1) unemployed; 2) partially employed, but seeking full-time employment or; 3) so discouraged that they have stopped looking for work, even though they are unemployed.

The chart speaks for itself…If this is a “green shoot,” it must be a weed.

Source: Stocks Deliver Their Best Quarter in Over a Decade: So What Now?

JPMorgan Chase & Co. and American Express Co. were told they need to boost common equity, less than four weeks after being informed they had enough to withstand a deeper economic slump. Morgan Stanley was directed to raise more funds after already selling stock to cover its stress-test shortfall. One firm was told June 1, people with direct knowledge said.

This means two things. 1) That the government’s stress tests were indeed a sham designed to coax investors back into bank stocks. 2) That the government expects more pain for the banking sector and isn’t prepared to have banks get out from under the TARP only to come back begging for federal aid at a later date.

As former New York Fed executive vice president pointed out recently, if banks repay TARP funds next week, “politically, the administration can claim a victory. They can claim TARP is working, we’re getting our money back and making a profit. But there are more shoes to drop in commercial and industrial loans, leveraged loans, and real estate.”

As we have attempted to make clear all along in Notes , this crisis boils down to a battle between hope versus facts. You know which side Team Obama and the mainstream press is on. And you know which side we’re on.

After combing through the past 25 editions of the “Monthly Treasury Statement of Receipts and Outlays of the United States Government,” which is compiled and published by the Treasury Department’s Financial Management Service, we created the following chart.

Here’s what’s going on:

Tellingly, for the first time since 1983, the U.S. government posted a deficit in April. That’s a big swing in the wrong direction, as the bump in personal tax collections in April historically results in a big surplus — on average about $68 billion.

What are the implications of this tanking tax revenue?

For starters, it means the federal government deficit is going be as bad or worse than the $2.5 trillion Bud Conrad, chief economist of Casey Research, projected it to be last year.

If the shortfall in individual and corporate tax revenue persists — and we expect it will — then the deep hole the government is already digging for itself will be that much deeper.

Using the government’s own expense projections, the revenue shortfall, even if it doesn’t worsen further, would push the fiscal 2009 budget deficit up to about $1.958 trillion. For reasons we’ve discussed at some length in The Casey Report, those expense projections are likely to be significantly understated.

Case in point, in January the government projected a $1.2 trillion deficit for fiscal year 2009… in March, just three months later, they upped the projection to $1.8 trillion. That $600 billion “adjustment” alone totaled more than any full-year budget deficit in the nation’s history.

Yet, the real fly in the ointment is that the actual borrowing by the Treasury is likely to be at least half a trillion dollars more than the deficit.

That’s because the Treasury is buying toxic paper (mortgage, credit card loans, etc.) and putting them on the books with a higher value than the market is willing to assign. While that makes the budget deficit appear smaller, it doesn’t negate the fact that the government still must borrow the money needed to buy the toxic paper in the first place. The additional revenue shortfall means they have to raise that much more money. Based on the struggle they had pushing the $14 billion in long-term notes at the latest auction, it becomes increasingly apparent that when push comes to shove, the only way the government is going to come up with the money needed to meet its aggressive spending is to print it up.

In other words, events are rolling out almost exactly as we have been anticipating. Below, for example, are some useful excerpts from an April 3 article titled “Widening Deficits” by Casey Research CEO Olivier Garret. To quote…

In the midst of the Great Depression, the 1931 federal tax revenues had fallen by 52% from their 1929 highs. While we do not expect anything that dramatic in 2009, it would not be unrealistic to see a 20% to 25% reduction in cash flow from tax collections this tax season. Such a drop would pose significant challenges given that spending commitments are off the charts and climbing.

Later in that same article, Olivier continued,

In the absence of sizeable increases in tax revenues, it is quite clear that the lion’s share of the planned sales of Treasuries in 2009 cannot be met by demand from the market. Either the Treasury will have to raise interest rates significantly, or the Fed will need to step in very aggressively to support the planned auctions. Our expectation is that both will happen. Auctions will fail and the Fed will step in. The market will react to more printing by anticipating inflation and demanding higher interest rates. Once the cycle starts, it will be very hard to pull interest rates back.

We continue to stand by our December forecast that the 2009 budget deficit is more likely to widen to levels between $2.5 and $3 trillion rather than the CBO’s $1.8 trillion forecast. We also believe that inflation could start setting in as early as Q3 of 2009 and will accelerate sharply by 2010. Treasury Rates will start climbing and the era of cheap money will end, making it harder for overleveraged consumers, businesses, and governments to service their debt.

Olivier’s forecast of failed auctions and rising interest rates on Treasuries proved more prophetic as a May 7th story from Bloomberg reported:

Treasury 30-year bonds fell the most in four months as investors demanded higher-than-forecasted yields at today’s auction of $14 billion of the securities with the U.S. slated to sell a record amount of debt this year.

“This is a problem,” said Chris Ahrens, head interest-rate strategist at UBS AG in Stamford, Connecticut, one of 16 primary dealers required to bid in Treasury auctions. “The market required a fairly significant discount to buy the bonds.”

Thirty-year bonds have lost investors 20.9 percent this year, Merrill Lynch & Co. indexes show, as the Treasury increases securities sales to help fund a swelling budget deficit. Yields climbed to a six-month high today as the auction drew a yield of 4.288 percent, higher than the 4.192 percent average forecast in a Bloomberg News survey of seven primary dealers. Demand was below average, judging by total bids.

The benchmark 30-year bond yield climbed 23 basis points, or 0.23 percentage points, the most since Jan. 5, to 4.316 percent, at 5:25 p.m. in New York, according to BGCantor Market data. It was the highest yield since Nov. 14. The 3.5 percent security due in February 2039 dropped 3 15/32, or $34.69 per $1,000 face amount, to 86 3/8.

The 10-year note yield increased 16 basis points to 3.345 percent, the highest since Nov. 24.

Two-year notes yielded 1 percent for the first time since March 18, while the rate on the three-month Treasury bill was 0.18 percent.

So, what does all this mean?

As per above, the rock-and-the-hard-place scenario we have been predicting is unfolding before our eyes. At this point, other than sharply changing course and letting the free market cope with the crisis through a brutal “survival of the fittest” scenario, the government is left with no other option than to accelerate its buying up of its own debt.

Which is to say, it must push even harder on the levers of its printing presses, further setting the stage for the massive period of inflation we continue to see as inevitable… and for the stunning rise in interest rates we are now positioning ourselves for in The Casey Report (and, you can too… learn more).

Source:  Tax Revenues Tanking

• General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) Chief Executive Fritz Henderson yesterday (Thursday) told Bloomberg News that bankruptcy is “probable.” The top U.S. automaker has until June 1 to cut costs and debt or face a government-imposed bankruptcy and asset sale.

• Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) posted a flat quarterly profit – a result of shoppers taking advantage of low prices while the store took hits from a strengthened U.S. dollar, Reuters reported. The retail giant earned 77 cents a share in the first quarter ended April 30, compared to 76 cents a share, the year prior.

• The United Kingdom’s largest phone company, BT Group PLC (NYSE: BT), announced plans to cut 15,000 more jobs and lowered its dividend 58.9% to 6.5 pence a share. The company made those announces as it posted a fourth-quarter loss of 977 million pounds ($1.48 billion) on costs to overhaul its global services division, Bloomberg reported.

• Pittsburgh-based PNC Financial Services Group Inc. (NYSE: PNC) said it plans to sell as much as 15 million shares to raise up to $653 million in capital, Reuters reported. After last week’s bank stress tests, regulators told PNC it needed to raise $600 million to stay afloat should the global economy deteriorate further.

• Chrysler LLC and General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) will tell up to 3,000 U.S. dealerships this week they are closing, which could result in another 150,000 job losses, according to the National Automobile Dealers Association. The losses would come on top of the 50,000 people already out of work because of the dealer shutdowns that have taken place so far this year. Chrysler, according to a bankruptcy filing, is exercising its right to reject contracts at 789 dealers — about a quarter of its U.S. retail network. The targeted dealers represent only 14% of Chrysler’s total sales volume, MarketWatch reported.

• Irving Picard, the trustee liquidating Bernard L. Madoff’s investment company, said he expects to approve at least $100 million of investor claims by May 25 and achieve “significant” clawback-suit settlements in the next few weeks, Bloomberg reported. Picard said he has recovered as much as $1 billion of Madoff- related assets and that he has filed lawsuits to recover another $10.1 billion.  Bernard Madoff on March 12 pleaded guilty to running the biggest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history and faces as much as 150 years in prison when he is sentenced June 29 in Manhattan federal court.

• The Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA) now predicts global oil consumption will fall this year at the fastest rate since 1981. The adviser to 28 industrialized nations on energy policy, said the rise in oil prices to a six-month high above $60 this week was due to sentiment rather than supply and demand fundamentals, with consumption set to fall by 2.56 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2009.

Source: Investment News Briefs Friday, May 15, 2009

At least seven of the 10 banks considered by the government to be inadequately capitalized, as well as two others that were found to have sufficient capital cushioning, announced fund raising plans following the release of the stress test results.

PNC Financial Services Group Inc. (NYSE: PNC), U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: USB), KeyCorp (NYSE: KEY), Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC), and Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) all announced stock offerings or asset sales in the past week.

BB&T Corp. (NYSE: BBT) and Capital One Financial Corp. (NYSE: COF), which were deemed by the government to be sufficiently capitalized, have also announced stock offerings.

Still, S&P says the banks, which have will continue to struggle without a bigger capital cushion than regulators require.

“There’s nothing to say that this banking crisis can’t go on for another three or four years,” S&P Managing Director Tanya Azarchs said.

S&P on May 4 said it might lower its ratings for 23 U.S. banks and thrifts, including 10 that underwent stress tests, citing concern about the industry’s capitalization, Reuters reported. It said the 23 companies had at least a 50% chance of being downgraded within 90 days.

Source: Standard & Poor’s Says Banking Crisis Has Entered New Phase

U.S. banks – under government order to raise capital as a result of the recently completed bank stress tests, and desperate to shed the onerous shackles of the U.S. Treasury Department’s Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) – have been announcing billions in secondary stock offerings in recent days, and experts say many more such deals can be expected.

Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (NYSE: APC), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) and Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) yesterday (Tuesday) became the latest U.S. companies to pursue new sources of capital, announcing deals that involved offerings of stock or debt, or outright asset sales.

Those announcements came just one day after four of the largest U.S. banks – BB&T Corp. (NYSE: BBT), Capital One Financial Corp. (NYSE: COF), U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: USB) and KeyCorp (NYSE: KEY) – announced plans to raise a combined $6.5 billion through stock offerings. At least some of the money raised will be used to repay the TARP money the federal government injected into troubled U.S. banks.

“All the deal activity sends a clear signal – investors are willing to take more risk,” says Louis Basenese, a longtime expert on the IPO market and editor of The Takeover Trader and White Cap Report newsletters. “And it’s already trickling down into the IPO space. In the next two weeks, four deals are slated, doubling the total volume for 2009.”

When asked if all these deals could end up soaking up all the capital that’s still sitting on the sidelines – blunting, as a result, the rally that’s had stocks surging over the past two months – Basenese said there’s no reason for that to be a concern.

“With $8 trillion-plus on the sidelines, we’ve still got a ways to go before the capital is gone,” Basenese said.
In fact, we may well be just getting started, he says.

“During slowdowns, the IPO space is as lonely as a geek on prom night. But right now, our geek might be getting lucky. Along with the market rally and strong appetite for secondary offerings, we’re seeing IPOs hit the market again,” Basenese said. “This week we get Digital Globe. Next week, OpenTable and SolarWinds are slated to debut. And there are over 100 more in the pipeline to fuel a sustained recovery.”

The Latest Deals

Yesterday’s announcements involved a carmaker, an energy company and a top U.S. bank.

Anadarko, an independent oil-and-gas exploration and production company based in Woodlands, Tex., said yesterday that it priced a public offering of 30 million shares at $45.50 each. Underwriters have an option to buy up to 4.5 million additional shares of the company’s common stock through the offering, which is expected to close Friday.

The company’s shares were down about 6% and listed at $45.70 in pre-market trading yesterday morning, FoxBusiness.com reported.

Bank of America, ordered to find $33.9 billion in new capital as a result of the recent bank stress tests, has finally sold about $7.3 billion worth of its shares in China Construction Bank Corp., Reuters and Bloomberg News both reported.

BofA sold 13.5 billion shares, or 6% of CCB, to investors including Hopu Investment Management Co. and Singapore sovereign wealth fund Temasek Holdings Pte. The sale cuts Bank of America’s stake in CCB to 10.6%.

Hopu Investment was founded in 2007 by Fang Fenglei, Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s (NYSE: GS) China partner. Hopu and Temasek have collaborated before; in late April, the two announced plans to invest $300 million in a Mongolian iron-ore mine. It was Hopu’s first deal since being launched as a private equity firm, Bloomberg News reported.

Bank of America’s sale of part of its CCB stake wasn’t news to Money Morning readers. In a story published in mid-January – “The Global Financial Crisis Will Cost Western Banks a Share of Future China Profits” – Money Morning reported that BofA was going to have to sell some of its stake in that key China bank. Indeed, the report detailed how banks in the United States and Europe would have to divest their interests in China’s promising banking market in order to close capital deficits created by the global financial crisis. The story was part of Money Morning’s ongoing investigation of the U.S. banking bailouts.

On Friday, BofA filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to sell as much as 1.25 billion shares of common stock, a move that would raise as much as $11 billion (given a proposed maximum offering price of $8.79 per share).

BofA said it will use the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes. Bank of America Securities LLC and Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: SQD) were listed as the underwriters for the stock offering.

Bank of America is also looking at still more asset sales to raise the rest of the required capital. Last Thursday the bank said it’s looking to end a loss-sharing agreement with the federal government on $118 billion of troubled assets, calling the agreement unnecessary – and too expensive.

Ford announced plans to sell 300 million common shares, and said it would use the proceeds from the offering for “general corporate purposes,” and to make a contribution to a fund that pays for healthcare for its retirees.

Total shares outstanding will increase to 3.102 billion – or to 3.148 billion if underwriter’s option for an additional 45 million shares is exercised.

Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) are acting as joint managers for the stock offering.

Ford’s shares closed yesterday at $5.01, down $1.07, or 17.6%, from Monday.

According to an SEC filing, a settlement with various unions calls for the initial three payments to be made on Dec. 31, 2009, June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2011. At each date, as much as $610 million of the amounts payable could be satisfied by the delivery of Ford common stock, valued at fixed prices of $2.00, $2.10 and $2.20 per share, respectively, the filing stated.

Ford intends to use a portion of the proceeds of this offering to fund all or a portion of the payments to the settlement fund – in lieu of delivering shares on those payment dates, according to a media report by 123Jump.com.

Ford Chief Executive Alan R. Mulally took advantage of the stock-offering announcement to say that Ford’s management and employees are making “strong progress on our transformation plan – gaining retail market share with great new products, improving quality, reducing costs and positioning Ford for a return to profitability.”

Ford also said that it’s unlikely the company will pay any dividend in the foreseeable future. Ford last paid dividends in the third quarter of 2006.

As Ford Sells Shares, So Do GM’s Top Execs

Interestingly, Ford is trying to sell shares to investors just as a group of top General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) executives – including GM Vice Chairman Robert A. “Bob” Lutz – have sold what was left of their personal stakes, according to several SEC filings on Monday. The stock sales by GM executives were reported by MarketWatch.com.

“Our shareholders are obviously facing some pretty severe dilution if the bond exchange goes through or we end up in bankruptcy,” GM spokesperson Julie Gibson told MarketWatch. “Either way, no matter the outcome, we’ll essentially be issuing new stock.”

She acknowledged to MarketWatch that the executives took advantage of a trading window to sell their shares while there’s still some value “like most reasonable people would do.”

GM’s executives sold their shares just as the company is trying to rid itself of $27 billion in debt by persuading thousands of creditors to exchange their bonds for 10% in GM stock.

According to the MarketWatch report, the SEC filings say that Lutz was joined by fellow Vice Chairman Thomas G. Stephens, Ralph J. Szygenda, Troy A. Clarke, Gary L. Cowger and Carl-Peter Forster. All together, the six sold nearly 205,000 shares between Friday and Monday, fetching between $1.45 and $1.61 a share.

GM’s shares closed yesterday at $1.15 each, or 20.14%.

It is worth noting that Money Morning Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson wrote this week that there’s a chasm of difference between the prospects of GM and Chrysler LLC – the two foundering members of Detroit’s “Big Three” – and Ford, which Hutchinson says may actually be worth investing in.

If the market shakes out as Hutchinson expects, Ford could emerge as only real winner among the U.S. automakers.

Under such a scenario, “Ford will pick up market share from GM and Chrysler, even if domestic brands overall continue to see their market share ebb,” Hutchinson wrote. “That will reduce Ford’s losses, and when the automobile market does rebound, the company that created the original automobile assembly line will move to a position of substantial profitability. For the first time since Henry Ford kept the Model T in production too long in the 1920s, Ford may become the dominant U.S.-controlled automobile manufacturer.”

As the secondary-offering market heats up, and the recession, Basenese, the stock-offering expert, says investors need to focus on these investment opportunities – and especially on those that emanate from the expected escalation in IPOs.

“History suggests IPOs are the place to invest coming out of a slump,” he said. “For proof, all we need to do is go back to the last ’severe’ recession on record, from 1973 to 1975. As we exited, IPOs turned in impressive numbers, with first day gains jumping to 40% and three-year returns climbing to more than 150%, easily outpacing the Standard & Poor’s 500.”

Source: Big Surge in Secondary Stock Offerings Will Lead to a Major Uptick in IPO Profit Plays

• U.S. home prices posted their biggest drop on record during the first quarter, with the median price falling 14% to $169,000 from a year earlier, the National Association of Realtors said. Prices fell in 134 of 152 metropolitan areas, with values plunging the most in Florida and California.

• The U.S. trade deficit grew 5.5% to a smaller-than- forecast $27.6 billion, dropping for the first time in eight months.  The gap widened as exports slumped to a two-year low, overwhelming shrinking imports, reflecting reduced American demand for goods made abroad. The report buoyed hopes that a record contraction in global trade flows may be easing. “It’s one more indicator that things are getting worse at a lot slower pace than before,” said John Ryding, chief economist at RDQ Economics LLC in New York, Bloomberg reported.

• The Social Security trust fund will run out of assets in 2037, four years sooner than previously thought, a report by the fund’s trustees said yesterday (Tuesday).  The same report said spending on Medicare, the health insurance plan for the elderly, will reach a legal limit by 2014.  Payroll tax contributions to Social Security and Medicare, the two main safety nets for American retirees and the elderly, are declining due to the recession just as the baby-boom generation begins to retire, Bloomberg reported.

• Citigroup Inc (NYSE: C) is using almost all of the $45 billion in U.S. taxpayers’ money it received from the TARP program to make new loans.  A committee at the bank, appointed to oversee the use of the money it received from TARP, approved $44.75 billion in lending initiatives as of March 31, according to an AP story, which appeared on the New York Times website.

• A.P. Moller-Maersk, the owner of the world’s biggest container shipping business, swung to a bigger net loss than expected in the first quarter and warned that the full year might end up that way too.  The company posted a net loss of $390 million for the first three months, as the dive in global trade and freight rates hit shipping and low oil prices hit its oil business even harder than expected, Reuters reported.

• Bank regulators in all 27 countries of the European Union will conduct confidential stress tests by September, stepping up scrutiny of risks after lenders absorbed more than $1 trillion of losses and writedowns in the global financial crisis, Bloomberg reported.  Finance ministers and the EU’s executive agency will get private reports and industry data from regulators.  Results for individual banks such as Spain’s Banco de Santander S.A. (ADR NYSE: STD) or Barclays Plc (ADR NYSE: BCS) won’t be released.

Source: Investment News Briefs Wednesday, May 13, 2009

And even with the ugliness caused by the release of the banking stress tests last week, it doesn’t look like we’ll be seeing values plunge. There’s simply too much money sitting on the sidelines, and it’s slowly creeping back in.

Since 1987 the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) has conducted a monthly survey on how we allocate our money between stocks, bonds and cash. And per the most recent survey, the percent of direct investments in individual stocks is at an all-time low of 17%, nearly half the historical average of 31%.

Thus, a mountain of cash remains on the sideline. If even a quarter of that cash returns to the market – and I suspect more than that will – we could feasibly march another 15% to 20% higher from here.

Investors who have been waiting for the perfect entry point could be quite disappointed to learn that we’re not going to get it. We may not see a second bottom or this “perfect entry point” everyone expects.

Even if there is a slight pullback, we may not see these price levels from March 6 again – realistically, in our lifetimes.

So what is a careful investor to do? Easy. Follow the time-tested steps we use to pick out undervalued companies in any market – including insider buying…

Insider Buying – The Best Buy Signal Investors Can Get

Quite simply, the single best buy signal that investors can get is strong insider buying. Heavy insider trading is the surest way you can tell if the management believes their company is undervalued.

• Insiders are the officers who run a company, the directors who oversee the officers, and 10% beneficial owners of the stock who are presumed to be more than ordinarily well apprised of the company’s business and future prospects.
• Insiders know virtually everything that can be known about the company they run. They know the pace of sales day to day. They know of new products in development. They know whether the company is a takeover candidate or is already getting unsolicited offers.
• They know everything that reasonably can be known about their company’s business prospects, employees, customers, suppliers and competitors…

In short, insiders have an unfair advantage when they go into the market to trade their own company’s stock shares. After all, they know not only all the public information about their company but a great deal of non-public information as well.

For this reason, the U.S. government requires all insiders to report their transactions to the SEC by the tenth day of the month following the month in which they buy or sell their company stock shares.

It’s how “Uncle Sam” helps level the playing field for smaller investors. It opens a window on what the insiders are doing with their money. It also gives us an insider advantage when deciding whether a value play truly is undervalued.

Why It’s Risky To Base Your Investment Decisions on Insider Buying

It’s important to be careful when basing your decisions on the movements of insider buying. They can easily give you mixed signals. And while insider buying is the clearest signal you can get, insider selling is about the cloudiest.

Take a look at most publicly listed stocks and you might be surprised at how many sales are being recorded. Every day executives and officers are selling their company stock. But unlike purchases, there are a number of reasons why.

It could be that these officers have a large amount of their salary given to them as stock. Many executives receive salaries of $1 and the rest of their multi-million-dollar compensation packages are paid in stock. The only way they get that money is through regular stock sales.

It could be that these individuals are going through a nasty divorce, putting kids through college, building a new house, supporting a family member, or even has a gambling addiction.

Either way, the point is clear: Insider stock sales are not a clear signal to sell.

Bill Gates has been a regular seller of Microsoft (NYSE: MSFT) for decades. So has Larry Ellison at Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL). Yet if you’d held these stocks for the past 20 years, you would have done okay. In fact, you would have earned many, many times your original investment.

Even in the case of Enron where company executives were dumping billions of shares en-masse’, we cannot guarantee that there were no other motivations outside of the companies performance.

On the other hand, there is only one reason an insider purchases a stock: They believe it’s undervalued. That’s why insider buying is the best buy signal that you can get when trying to find undervalued companies.

Three Insider Buying Triggers To Watch For

Here are three “insider buying triggers” you should look out for:

• Purchases around price points. Keep an eye out for upper management, executives and directors consistently buying large amounts of stock around a specific price point. You’ll start to notice that they stick below a certain price level.
• Insider purchases relative to their current holdings. A director who owns a million shares, and who buys 10,000 more isn’t as interesting as one who’s buying two million more shares. Are they buying larger amounts than their current holdings?
• Salary levels of insiders. A director making $40 million who risks $30,000 isn’t as interesting as a middle manager that risks a majority of his annual salary on the same $30,000 purchase. The size of their purchases relative to their salaries lets you know how sure they are of their investment.

These are some of the biggest tips that the insiders give us that the markets are undervaluing a particular stock. By taking these simple cues, we can turn their insider knowledge to our advantage.

Insider Buying: The Best Buy Signal You Can Get

]]> http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/insider-buying-the-best-buy-signal-you-can-get/16490/feed 0