It’s the same way for politicians. Give them some cash and they’ll have it spent in no time flat, even if they can’t find anything worth buying.

Take, for example, the infamous Troubled Asset Relief Program, TARP in informal nomenclature. Passing the $700 billion program was a matter of financial and economic life and death according to Washington.

They gave us the same panicky “must-have” arguments as a six-year-old in the toy aisle.

But once they got what they wanted, their “toy” sits unused in the corner. As I write, TARP has over $140 billion in uncommitted funds and $300 billion that has yet to be spent.

Yep, they really need that money, didn’t they?

But the story gets even better. Fully expecting a miraculous recovery by the end of this year, our policymakers set TARP to expire on the final day of the 2009. They figured Obama would certainly prop all 300 million of us on his shoulders and carry us to safety by year’s end.

Now that the economic situation is not nearly as rosy as Obama promised a year ago, Washington is crying once again how badly it needs the money. It’s just how little Johnnie cries and moans when little Janie plays with the toy truck he hasn’t touched in months.

Geithner and his team have hundreds of billions of borrowed money up their sleeves with few viable ways of spending it. But now that we are asking for the money back, they say they need it… at least through next October (definitely not through November elections).

Do we ever grow up? It’s like a bunch of kids playing with very expensive toys in Washington.

*** Have you noticed a lot of Washington’s “economic recovery” programs are up for renewal these days?

TARP, the housing stimulus and all sorts of unemployment benefits have been or will be extended. I’m surprised we haven’t seen the resurgence in Cash for Clunkers.

There’s even a bill that would tax Wall Street to the tune of $150 billion annually to help create new jobs. It’s called, get this, “Let Wall Street Pay for the Restoration of Main Street Act of 2009.”

All these extensions and new programs are a surefire signal that all is not grand in the economic world and Washington had absolutely no idea what it was getting itself into as it spent nearly three trillion dollars to supposedly prop up the nation’s economy.

With Congress continuing its reach into the chest of the domestic economy, its no wonder gold prices are hitting new records day after day. By the time Washington is done, nothing “American” will have any intrinsic value left.

But just as I said yesterday about investing in the dollar’s downturn, be cautious of jumping on the golden bandwagon. It could be trouble.

So far this year, gold’s Street value has increased by 32%. It’s a strong gain when compared to historic moves, and it beat’s the S&P 500’s year-to-date climb of 22%, but how far will the bulls take it before they say enough is enough and the bottom falls out once again.

After all, gold really isn’t worth a lick.

You can’t eat it. It won’t fuel your truck. It won’t give you shelter and it won’t protect your house (unless you’ve got a good arm). When the dung really hits the fan, gold’s only strongpoint is it’s more valuable than a fancy certificate that says you own 1,000 shares of XYZ.

But even then, it’s only valuable because we say it is.

Let’s be flat-out honest with each other here. What are the chances of full-on economic calamity? I mean the kind of situation where you will dig your gold out from beneath the old oak tree and take it to the grocery store to buy a slab of bacon.

In other words, what are the chances you will actually use gold for its “emergency” purpose?

Slim to none, and I’m more pessimistic about this economy than any Roubini-following perma-bear.

Gold’s a trap, especially for the folks buying at today’s prices and actually paying to store the rare metal in some vault.

If you absolutely have to own gold, keep your ownership to a minimum, a few grand worth of coins or so. Nothing more.

Better yet, take advantage of the gold rush of ’09 and invest in the world’s gold miners. They are the ones fleecing the bandwagon riders and creating the ultimate market-beating profit potential.

In this market it is more important than ever to not be a clueless sheep merely following the herd.

Be the shepherd and lead the lambs to slaughter.

*** As options investors we love to lead the pack. That’s why over at TFN Strategic Trader, we are all smiles today. After locking in gains of 400% last week, we sold another set of call options for quick-and-easy gains of 60%.

On Friday I sent out a buy alert. This morning I said sell. Traders that followed my advice locked in three-day gains of 60%. Way better than gold.

Baltimore – (TFN): All eyes and ears are on the Fed this week. With Bernanke in New York discussing potential new bubbles and the New York Fed getting heat for overpaying AIG’s many creditors, investors are having a tough time knowing exactly who to follow.

For those of you who hold up the “Fire the Fed” signs, move over. I am thinking about joining your camp.

First, the real bad stuff. According to Neil Barofsky, TARP’s special inspector general, New York’s Fed (under the leadership of Tim Geithner) failed to use its leverage as the top-banking regulator to tell AIG’s lenders to take less than they were owed.

Instead of taking an across-the-board “haircut” as Obama and Pelosi told us we all should, finance giants like Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and Societe Generale said they want 100% of what they were owed.

The only holdout, UBS, said it would be willing to take 98%. But after tough looks from the guys from across the table, that offer was quickly rescinded.

According to Barofsky, the move cost the country billions of dollars and much, much more in confidence for the nation’s banking cops.

Thanks, Tim!

With that bit of news in today’s headlines, it is tough to find the confidence in some of the Fed’s latest plans to help pull the country from financial failure.

As the nation slowly recovers from last fall’s economic collapse, Bernanke and his troops at the Fed are now facing the difficult task of unwinding massive expansionary policies.

One trick discussed today is shortening the length of emergency loans from 90 days to just 24 days starting in January. It’s a pretty mundane move that will have little tangible effect on the markets.

But what could have a much larger impact, with much less transparency, is Bernanke’s recent discussion of paying interest on the reserves banks place with the Fed.

A popular move with many overseas central banks, the interest rates paid on reserves helps to establish a rate floor that regulators can gradually increase without raising overall interest rates.

Essentially, the move is a way of mopping up excessive liquidity without draining or lowering the water in a much larger pool of lending capital.

Like many things, the idea sounds great on paper, but so did letting the Fed negotiate with AIG’s trading partners and we now know how much that cost us.

Let’s face it. The markets like transparency and predictability. Anything less gives us what Friedrich Hayek called “malinvestment.”

As the Fed gets more and more creative in its efforts to boost the economy without creating deadly bubbles, transparency will go out the window.

Toss in growing political pressure from the folks from Washington and one thing is certain.

Anything the Fed does will cost you and I more money.

Good day… And a Terrific Tuesday to you! A Tuesday morning that is seeing a HUGE currency rally VS the dollar on the news that the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) opted to go ahead and hike rates now, and not wait for November’s meeting, as I had thought they would do! WOW!

The first hike… It has opened Pandora’s Box of interest rate hikes around the world… For, if the RBA went this soon, then we can expect Norway’s Norges Bank to push their rate hike earlier on the calendar, maybe even later this month! And they won’t be the only ones! Look for New Zealand to hike rates this year, and who knows what other country (Brazil?) will follow after that… But I see them coming, and they’re marching the death march of the dollar!

OK, that was a little dramatic, while I don’t believe, although I have more doubts every day, that the dollar would collapse to nothing, I do believe it has a long way to go when it comes to weakening. How else will the U.S. pay pack their debts in the future? It sure won’t be because of a cut in Gov’t Spending! That is… Unless all this deficit spending can be reversed and Gov’t is cut (in size) to resemble something from 50 years ago! But, that’s like asking for the moon and sky, eh?

Let’s get back to the Aussie rate hike, that’s more exciting and upbeat than talking about what’s going to be needed in the future here in the U.S! The statement that followed the RBA rate hike, was very upbeat… So… I totally expect another rate hike next month from the RBA!

OK… The dollar’s weakness this morning isn’t all due to the Aussie rate hike, and prospects for other rate hikes around the world… In 2001 I wrote a white paper called, “The Demise of the Dollar”… This was the thesis for all the things I talk about almost daily regarding the reasons the dollar would got into a secular bear market… And this was one year, let me repeat that, one year, BEFORE the dollar entered into a weak dollar trend in Feb of 2002!

The reason I bring this up here in 2009, is that there is an article in the U.K. Independent that’s making the rounds, that’s called… “The Demise of the dollar”! This report though is about secret meetings with the Gulf Arabs along with China, Russia, Japan and France, and they are planning to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.

Secret meetings have already been held by finance ministers and central bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the scheme, which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars.

Uh-Oh… That’s serious stuff folks… And that death march I talked about above? Well, if this story is true, that death march just became much louder!

Right now, however, the markets are not taking the story hook, line and sinker, just yet… Yes, the dollar has been sold, but not like you would think, if traders had taken the story to heart… I think some digestion time needs to be had first… I mean the currency traders had the first rate hike and then this story on their plates all at one meal… That’s a lot to digest! And Besides.. The Saudi Bank Gov. is denying that any of these meetings took place… Of course to conspiracy buffs like me, that’s akin to saying, “These meetings DID take place, and we’re just covering up the evidence” HA!

Now… Some might be cursing these countries right now, for dealing this rumored blow to the dollar… But, it’s not like the dollar didn’t have it coming! The Deficit Spending… For instance, is one thing that people that “know better” realize that the U.S. will not be able to climb out from under the deficit rock… And those knuckleheads who said “Deficits don’t matter”? Well… I’ve said this many times before, but I can’t talk about the Deficits don’t matter crowd without talking about how these people remind me of a guy… He’s standing on top of the Empire State Building, and decides to jump off… As he passes the 56th floor, he says… “So far… So good!”

Well, unfortunately for our “Deficits don’t matter” guy falling to the ground, the sidewalk is coming at him very quickly now…

And here’s another thing that should just tick you off to no end, but you have to think that the people that have loaned us money, are wondering if they’ll ever get paid back… What I’m talking about here is the story from yesterday, regarding the TARP funds… You might want to sit down for this one folks…

Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), says that despite multiple statements on Oct. 14 of last year that these nine banks were healthy and only receiving government funds for the good of the country’s economy, federal officials knew otherwise. He went on to say that “the Treasury Dept. and the Federal Reserve lied to the American public last fall when they said the first nine banks to receive government bailout funds were healthy.”

That’s right… They LIED TO US! Now, doesn’t that just tick you off? It sure ticks me off!

So… You can see some of the reasons the countries mentioned above might be thinking about removing the dollar as the pricing mechanism when it comes to oil…

OK… We started up beat, then got brought down, let’s get back to upbeat! Hey! How about Gold? When I turned on the screen this morning, Gold was $1,020! You would think that even if the U.K. Independent story is just a rumor, that Gold would gain on the rumors…

I read a story last night, while waiting for the so-called “Epic Battle” between the Vikings and Packers on Monday Night Football, that one analyst was of the belief that Gold was about to return to its link to the price of Oil… Hmmm… Well, I personally hope that’s not the case, as I certainly don’t want to see the price of Oil rise to the levels I think Gold is going to rise to!

Yesterday, I did a presentation on the DTI network… (I had given you all the link to it last week) My power point presentation didn’t work, so I had to just “wing it” (yeah, like talking for 30 minutes on how we got here, what’s going on, and why one needs the power of portfolio diversification was difficult for me! HA!) I think they want me to come back next week… DTI educates investors / traders/ and people that just want to know how the markets work, so it’s all for a good cause, because… An educated investor, is a good investor!

OK… Let’s see… OH! I wanted to talk about this yesterday and totally forgot, but it’s not too late today to talk about it…

One thing that we’ll begin to see this month is the earnings season…
You might recall that in previous quarter ends I thought that stocks would get taken to the woodshed, because of lousy earnings, only to be surprised at the earnings that were posted… But trying not to be the boy who cried wolf, I’ll once again say that I just don’t see the earnings to support stock prices. This time I think we’ll see that the method used in previous quarters by Corporations to produce the earnings was cost cutting… One would have to think that the Corporations have cut to the bone… And now, we’ll get to the cheese that binds for earnings… A lack of revenue…

I really liked the reaction of the non-dollar currencies, led by the Aussie dollar, after the RBA rate hike… It was like “old days”… Uh-Oh, I have a song in my head… “Old days Good times I remember, Fun days, Filled with simple pleasures, Drive-in movies, Comic books and blue jeans, Howdy doody, Baseball cards and birthdays, Take me back, To a world gone away,
Memories, Seem like yesterday….

Yes, the “old days”… Well, in this case I was talking about currencies trading on “Fundamentals” not stupid trading themes, not flights to safety, not deleveraging, but plain and simple fundamentals, things that ordinary people, like me, can understand, and place a value on a currency based on the fundamentals!

But… We’ve not really seen a fundamental trend since July of 2008… However, if we begin to see the rate hikes that I think we’ll begin to see, it could be the harbinger of a return to fundamentals… And that, my friends, and dear readers would be like manna from heaven for your Pfennig writer!

Well… Since I came in this morning, Gold has gained $5 more, to $1,025! Looks like the all-time high of $1,033.90 that came in March of 2008, could be in jeopardy… My love’s in jeopardy, baby… Oooh, ooh, ooh, ooh…

Maybe Gold moving higher can get Silver going too! My friend, the Mogambo Guru, reported yesterday that silver analyst, Ted Butler, reports that in the last 10 months, “some 150 million ounces of silver can easily be documented to have been bought by investors.
Undocumented purchases would add tens of millions more ounces.”

In fact, when you add it all up, “Investment demand for silver this year is running at a full 25% of world mine production and over 20% of total production (including recycling). This is a remarkable historical turnabout.”

Chuck here… Back from a trip to the Mogambo’s letter… I just love the way the Mogambo ends his letter each week… He talks about how people should be buying Gold, Silver, and Oil, and then says… “Hey! This investing stuff is easy! Whee!”

OK… To recap… The RBA did raise rates 25 BPS last night, and sounded quite upbeat in their after rate hike statement. Look for other countries to follow now that Pandora’s Box of rate hikes has been opened. There’s a story going around about countries banding together to remove the dollar as the pricing mechanism for Oil trades… It’s being denied, but there’s smoke… And you know what I say when there’s smoke… And Gold is pushing the envelope on its all-time high of $1,033.90…

Currencies today 10/6/09: A$ .8875, kiwi .7355, C$ .9395, euro 1.4730, sterling 1.59, Swiss .9745, rand 7.4230, krone 5.6920, SEK 6.97, forint 181.15, zloty 2.8370, koruna 17.3360, RUB 29.81, yen 89, sing 1.4025, HKD 7.75, INR 46.99, China 6.8263, pesos 13.56, BRL 1.7593, dollar index 76.35, Oil $71.13, 10-year 3.22%, Silver $16.99, and Gold… $1,025.45

That’s it for today… Hope your Tuesday is Terrific!

Chuck Butler

Source: RBA Raises Rates!

So with some historic irony, one year and two weeks after Lehman Bros. bit the dust, another debt-burdened, credit-reliant, potentially “too big to fail” institution is looking to either stick its bondholders with a raw deal or enter sudden bankruptcy. We won’t pretend to know exactly how this one will end, but the market has certainly voiced its opinion:

Heh, and of course, Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) has a horse in this race. They stand to make about a billion bucks if CIT goes into bankruptcy — the fruits of a smartly designed loan agreement. Hank Paulson, despite his GS pedigree, didn’t make such a deal when he put $2.3 billion in TARP funds on the line… a CIT bankruptcy would mean a near-total loss of taxpayer bailout loans.

CIT is one of the biggest lending sources for small- and medium-size business in America… what happens to this recovery when this well runs dry?

With or without CIT, “The real job creators in the U.S. economy, small businesses, will not expand hiring as expected,” forecasts Dan Amoss. “There are many reasons for subdued hiring plans; an emerging reason to avoid expansion and hiring will be heightened expectations that tax rates will soar in the future to pay for out-of-control government spending.

“So I expect over the next several months, mainstream pundits and forecasters will start worrying about tepid hiring, even as the pace of job losses slows. As we ‘lap’ the 2009 corporate cost cutting by early 2010, and top lines fail to rebound, earnings estimates will have to come back down. I’m amazed at how many sell-side analysts are modeling V-shaped recoveries in 2010 earnings. Most stock prices are disconnected from reality…

“The labor market is dealing with a structural imbalance fueled by government-sponsored housing and credit bubbles. Many will call for the government to ‘solve’ this labor market problem, which will cause a new type of market dislocation. By early 2010, some will push for the federal government to start hiring the chronically unemployed in ‘New Deal’ types of programs.”

Source: The Lehman of 2009

On one hand, the $130 billion he spent on acquisitions – FleetBoston Financial Corp., MBNA Corp., LaSalle Bank Corp., Countrywide Financial Corp., Charles Schwab Corp.’s (Nasdaq: SCHW) U.S. Trust private banking unit and Merrill Lynch – that more than tripled the size of Bank of America, making it the largest U.S. lender both by assets and deposits.

On the other, his open-wallet policy and the example it set forth almost perfectly encapsulates the boom, bust and nascent rebound of the U.S. housing and banking crisis – which later became the financial plague that devastated markets all over the world.

In the second half of 2007, the extent of the U.S. housing crisis began to crystallize when Countrywide’s freewheeling subprime-lending policy irreversibly sank the nation’s largest home lender. Lewis moved in and acquired the troubled lender for $4 billion the following January, and in doing so, he put Bank of America on the hook for Countrywide $1.5 trillion loan portfolio.

In the second half of 2008, the extent of the how much havoc the destruction of investment banks and brokerage firms would wreak upon the world became clear. The vortex of it was Sept. 15, the day the Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (OTC: LEHMQ) declared bankruptcy and Bank of America agreed to pay $29 billion for world’s largest brokerage firm, Merrill Lynch, which probably would have failed had it not found a partner.

Lewis’ spending got Bank of America into this mess. The question now is whether continued  spending – using the $45 billion bailout courtesy of the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) – will get BofA out of it.

And Lewis seems to acknowledge both in the news release announcing his voluntary departure.

“Bank of America is well positioned to meet the continuing challenges of the economy and markets,” Lewis said. “We are in position to begin to repay the federal government’s TARP investments. For these reasons, I decided now is the time to begin to transition to the next generation of leadership at Bank of America.”

Lewis naturally defends his actions just as much as critics chide him for them.

“Their loan portfolio is horrible looking and it’s not going to be easy for them,” Mike Williams, research director at Gradient Analytics in Scottsdale, Arizona, said in a Bloomberg News interview before Lewis announced his departure. “They would have been better off without the Merrill and Countrywide acquisitions over the next few years.”

Money Morning Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson, a leading banking expert, says that Bank of America has a very difficult journey ahead of it.

“Lewis followed [predecessor CEO Hugh] McColl’s strategy of expanding BofA by acquisition,” he said. “The trouble is that his last 2 deals were both lousy. Countrywide was at the epicenter of all that was bad about housing finance, and that was obvious in January 2008, when he bought it. Just a terrible deal.”

In fact, Hutchinson believes there’s only one viable option for Bank of America.

“BofA will have to be broken up, but may need to be sorted out by a liquidator/ the government,” he said.

Spinning Merrill

The Merrill merger was perhaps the defining moment in Lewis’ tenure, and he Lewis has played the victim and hero of the saga.

Lewis testified that U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and former U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry M. “Hank” Paulson Jr. pressured him not only to move ahead with a merger with Merrill Lynch despite reservations, but also to stay quiet about the mounting losses at the crumbling investment bank.

And in a note to employees announcing his departure, he took credit for the fact that Merrill has contributed 24% to the Bank of America’s first-half profit, boosted trading and investment-banking revenue, Bloomberg reported.

“I am gratified that even some of the critics of our acquisition of Merrill Lynch have come to acknowledge how well the deal is working out for our clients,” Lewis wrote. “This journey has been a rocky one and not for the faint of heart, but perseverance is paying off.”

But to the rest of the world, Lewis was most often seen sitting under the hot light of probes by Congress, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and New York’s attorney general all trying to determine if Lewis misled investors about Merrill’s losses and bonuses.

And even if shareholders agreed with Lewis’ decisions, they didn’t prefer him to be the company’s face. In April, shareholders voted 50.34% in favor of stripping Lewis of his chairman title.

Changing of the Guard

When Lewis steps down from his post Dec. 31, he joins the ranks of fellow financial firm executives – James Cayne of The Bear Stearns Cos., Charles Prince of Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), Stanley O’Neal of Merrill, Kennedy Thompson of Wachovia and Richard Fuld of Lehman Brothers, John Thain of  Merrill Lynch – that resigned, many in disgrace, either during or in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.

Among the survivors, Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS), and Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM).

Bank of America said it will find a replacement by Lewis’ last day, and media outlets have already began making lists of possible successors.

Among the names frequently mentioned:

• Brian Moynihan, head of Bank of America’s consumer and small business banking unit.
• Sallie Krawcheck, former Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) CFO and president of Bank of America’s global wealth and investment management unit.
• Tom Montag, former Merrill executive and head of Bank of America’s corporate and investment banking unit.

An outsider might well be the best choice, says Money Morning’s Hutchinson.

Lewis is “leaving a company that no human being could manage, with vast problems, and far too broad a franchise,” Hutchinson said. “North Carolina retail bankers haven’t a clue how to run a top international investment bank like Merrill and vice versa. There’s nobody available to succeed him that can do the job.”

Source: Boom, Bust and Rebuild: Bank of America and the Kenneth Lewis Legacy

And with good reason. The United States has a bigger and more-troubled financial sector than most countries. It also has a bigger overhang from the housing bubble, has a bigger balance-of-payments deficit and has a budget deficit that’s fat enough to stall the recovery.

It would be nice to have an economic recovery to invest in that didn’t have all of these problems.

Truth be told, such an investment play does exist. What’s more, the market I have in mind is advanced enough for us to invest in it without having to go through all the rigmarole of American Depository Receipt (ADR) investing. Nor will you have to make a potentially risky foray out onto some foreign stock exchange to buy the shares, because they are almost all listed here.

The country I’m talking about is Canada. Think of it as being like home – but without the problems that our home market (the United States) currently suffers from.

Our Healthy Neighbor to the North

When the recession struck, Canada was hit by it quite badly, but for different reasons from its southern neighbor. The Canadian housing market was nowhere near as overheated as its U.S. counterpart. So Canada’s housing downturn wasn’t as deep.

And what about the banking systems? To be sure, Canadian banks received a bailout, but it was less than $20 billion in total. Compare that to the veritable alphabet soup of U.S. bailout programs ranging from “TARP” and “TALF” that have injected more than $2 trillion into the U.S. financial system.

On the other hand, natural resources prices crashed last autumn, which had a major effect on Canada’s resource-based economy. A number of large projects in the Athabasca Tar Sands region were cancelled, for example – since this region has oil reserves around the size of the entire Middle East, its development is crucial to Canada’s future.

The “loonie,” Canada’s currency, declined from around “parity” to the U.S. dollar to an exchange ratio of C$1.30=$1 U.S. In effect, this was a “flight to safety” into the dollar and U.S. Treasuries. And it affected Canada as it did other countries.

In 2009, however, Canada and the United States have traveled down totally different paths. Canada did very little “stimulus,” so its state budget is in much better shape. The deficit for the 2009-2010 fiscal year $53 billion (C$56 billion) is only about 4% of gross domestic product (GDP). For the 2010-2011 fiscal year, the deficit is expected to be about $42 billion (C$45 billion), or 3.2% of GDP.

Energy Powers the Rally

The bounce in natural resources prices has really helped power up the rebound of Canada’s market.

Investment in the tar-sands region has picked up again, with a big merger between the two largest tar-sands-extraction companies: Suncor Energy Inc. (NYSE: SU) and Petro-Canada. The rising gold price hasn’t hurt either – mines are appearing all over the place! All this new activity has made the loonie bounce, so it’s back to about C$1.07=$1. While interest rates are as low as the United States, the Bank of Canada hasn’t done much “quantitative easing,” meaning that inflation isn’t too much of a worry.

The strong loonie helps here, too.

Canada seems to be recovering nicely. Its index of leading indicators jumped 1.1% in August, while manufacturing sales grew 5.5% in July. The country presently runs a modest current account deficit, but it’s only 2% of GDP. That’s much lower than even the current U.S. deficit, let alone that of 2007. It had a little more public debt than the United States in 2008, but given current U.S. deficits, those two lines almost certainly have crossed by now.

There are two caveats. The first is an obvious one: If commodity prices crash to earth, Canada will have some difficulty because commodities are a large part of its economy. Personally, I don’t see that happening. It’s notable that PetroChina Co. Ltd. (NYSE ADR: PTR) has just invested $1.7 billion in a Canadian tar sands project, so China must not think so, either.

The other risk is political. The current minority Conservative government of Stephen Harper has done a good job, but the opposition Liberals have withdrawn their parliamentary support. That means there may be an election this autumn. A Liberal majority government would be no disaster. They might be a bit sticky about oil-drilling permits, but would not otherwise rock the boat.

However, a Liberal coalition with the leftist New Democrats could push public spending and the deficit up, and there’s no guarantee against that. (One of the problems with multi-party systems like Canada’s is there is an almost infinite variety of possible governments after each election, some of which can be fairly alarming from a business perspective.)

However, Canadian elections are a much smaller risk than you get in most countries, and the commodity/oil price crash, if it happened, would help the U.S. economy and, presumably, your U.S. portfolio. So it’s worth having some Canadian exposure, perhaps with the Canadian market exchange traded fund (ETF) iShare MSCI Canada Index (NYSE: EWC).

For years it was almost fashionable to dismiss Canada from an economic standpoint. Now, however, that may well be where the smart money would like to go. As an economy, Canada is competent and stable.

It’s the kind of country that looks to be a good place for some of our money.

Commercial property values in the U.S. have plummeted 36% since peaking in 2007, and the commercial real estate market is unlikely to recover before 2012, according to the quarterly PricewaterhouseCoopers Korpacz Real Estate Investor Survey, released yesterday (Tuesday).

Office rents in New York and San Francisco may drop 20% through next year, the survey found.

“The biggest problem is that commercial real estate lags what happens in the economy,” Susan Smith, who is the director of PricewaterhouseCoopers’ real estate advisory practice and editor-in-chief of the survey, told Bloomberg News. “Companies are looking for ways to cut costs, many are continuing to reduce workers and are continuing to reduce their space needs.”

That means many of the banks that made commercial real estate have only realized a fraction of their losses. And as those losses continue to mount, we’re likely to see more and more bank failures.

Roughly $530 billion in mortgage-backed securities are due for refinancing between now and 2011, according to property researcher Foresight Analytics LLC. Foresight estimates that the U.S. banking sector could incur as much as $250 billion in commercial real estate losses, enough to cause a as many as 700 banks to fail, in that time.

The FDIC’s “problem list,” or banks that run a higher risk of failure, grew to 416 in the second quarter, up from 305 in the first quarter. That’s the highest number since the second quarter of 1994, when there were 434 banks on the list.

San Francisco-based Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC) has the largest share of the $3.1 trillion commercial debt market with 16.5% of its $821 billion loan portfolio invested. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) is a distant second with 5.4% of its portfolio invested in commercial loans, followed by Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) with 3.4%.

However, smaller banks – 92 of which have already folded this year compared to 25 last year – are even more at risk because they will likely have a harder time accessing the crucial capital to offset rising defaults, according to the TARP-inspired Congressional Oversight Panel’s August Oversight Report.

“Unlike large banks that can sustain a certain number of defaults, even of large commercial loans, smaller banks may have far more difficulty in absorbing more than a few large loan losses,” the panel said. “The FDIC’s statement that ‘banks have been able to raise capital without having to sell bad assets through the LLP’ may not reflect the reality for these banks.”

Indeed, the number of smaller banks expected to seized by the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) is forecast to accelerate by economists. More than 150 publicly traded U.S. banks have nonperforming loans that account for 5% of their assets, according to the report.

The panel said rising commercial real estate loan defaults may prompt the need for $12 billion to $14 billion more in TARP funds as well as well as stress tests for smaller banks.

The early 1990s saw a devastating crash of the real estate market, but this coming time around the result could be far worse. The $3.1 trillion that makes up the commercial real estate debt market is three times the size it was during the early 1990s – meaning the potential for losses is steeper than ever before.

In 1993, less than 2% of U.S. banks and thrifts had an exposure to commercial real estate that was more than five times their Tier I capital. By the end of last year, that ratio had spiked to 12%, involving about 800 banks and thrifts.

And this time around – compared to the early 1990s – banks left themselves no margin of safety in the form of “Tier I Capital” – a measure of how well a lender can navigate serious levels of losses. The higher the ratio, the less likely a lender will be able to work its way through a stretch when loans start going bad.

Source: Bank Failures Could Surge as Commercial Real Estate Losses Continue to Mount

The 64-year-old Mack will remain as Morgan’s Chairman when Gorman, 51, takes over the CEO post on January 1, the company said.

Mack came under criticism as he scaled back Morgan’s risk profile even as rivals like Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) regained momentum as the worst economic downturn since World War II began to wane, according to the Associated Press.

“Gorman has really earned his stripes,” Anton Schutz, president of Mendon Capital Advisors Corp., which owns Morgan Stanley shares, told Reuters. “He did a great job at Merrill, he’s doing a good job at Morgan Stanley, and the timing for a change seems to be good, because we’ve made it through the worst of the crisis.”

Before joining Morgan in 2006, Gorman had held a series of positions at Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., including leading its global private client business from 2001 to 2005.

Morgan received $25 billion in federal funds under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) last year, and has since repaid the entire amount to the U.S. government.

Source: Morgan Stanley CEO Steps Down, Will Remain as Chairman

However, the two largest recipients of TARP money – Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) and Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) – have yet to pay back their loans and the government is still exposed to possible losses from those two heavyweights, as well as from smaller U.S. banks.

The government netted roughly $4 billion – the equivalent of a 15% annual return – from  eight of the biggest banks that have fully repaid their obligations to the government, according to calculations by The New York Times.

Those financial institutions consist of:

• Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) – $1.4 billion in profit.
• Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) – $1.3 billion in profit.
• American Express Co. (NYSE: AXP) – $414 million in profit.
• Northern Trust Corp. (NYSE: NTRS), The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (NYSE: BK),    State Street Corp. (NYSE: STT), U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: USB) and BB&T Corp. (NYSE: BBT) – $100 million to $334 million in profit.
• Fourteen smaller banks that have repaid their debt – $35 million in profit.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) and Capital One Financial Corp. (NYSE: COF) could yield an additional profit of more than $3.1 billion in the coming month, but the final number is dependent on how much they will pay to buy back their warrants, The Times said.

Additionally, the U.S. Federal Reserve earned $16.4 billion through the first six months of the year, thanks to a range of rescue programs – including loans to investment banks and purchases of mortgage-backed securities – while the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) saw a profit of more than $7 billion on the fees it charged through a program that guaranteed debt issued by banks. Still, the FDIC has agreed to assume most of the risk on $80 billion in loans and other assets, and expects to eventually have to cover $14 billion in future losses on deals cut so far, according to The Wall Street Journal.

“Taxpayers should heave a sigh of relief that the investment in banks protected them from even more catastrophic losses from more bank failures,” said Aswath Damodaran, a finance professor at the New York University’s Stern School of Business.

The government said last year that its decision to purchase preferred shares from hundreds of banks ravaged by mortgage defaults would yield a positive return, including a 5% quarterly dividend and warrants to buy stock in the banks at a set price over 10 years.

As many banks stanched their losses and began to turn a profit, the government authorized them to buy back the preferred stock, make the dividend payments for each quarter since October. Banks also were permitted to buy back the warrants, which had a low fixed price – and which provided therefore provided a windfall for the government as the markets rallied.

The U.S. should consider imposing an automatic ban on dividend payments by lenders when “the bank stock price plummets and the banks aren’t doing well,” New York Federal Reserve Chairman William Dudley told CNBC, expressing concern over how the payouts could end up dissipating the banks’ capital.

Should a bank lose capital because of a falling stock price, it could raise more capital by issuing debt that is convertible, Dudley said.

Had private investors taken matching stakes in the banks in October, they would have tripled their investment to roughly $12 billion, or 44% on an annual basis, according to University of Louisiana at Lafayette finance professor Linus Wilson, who analyzed the data for The Times. But there’s a good reason for that. Under this hypothetical scenario, the private investors would have demanded a higher rate of return, bought in at a lower price, or both – because of the high risk that they would have been incurring.

But the government wasn’t in this to make a profit – it was working to stabilize a financial system that was quickly losing the public’s confidence, experts note.

“Had these banks tried to raise money any other way, they probably would have had to pay quite a bit more than the government received,” Espen Robak, head of Pluris Valuation Advisors, which analyzes the value of large financial institutions, told The Times.

Threat Posed by Loss-Shares

Despite the encouraging news that taxpayers are getting strong returns on their reluctant investments, the loan guarantees invested in the two largest TARP recipients – Citigroup and Bank of America – have not yet been repaid. Citi received $50 billion in TARP funds, while BofA got $45 billion.

In the last month, Citigroup has seen its stock surge roughly 58%, along with a 19% return in the shares of BofA, which leaves the U.S. government sitting on a combined $18 billion of profits from the warrants it purchased last year.

Those banks also hold troubled mortgages and other loans that no one can put a value on – which is why these so-called “toxic assets” have yet to attract buyers.

“No one has a good handle how much is out there,” Elizabeth Warren, the chairman of the Congressional Oversight Panel who acts as the so-called “TARP watchdog,” told Reuters Television in an interview last month. “Here we are 10 months into this crisis…and we can’t tell you what the dollar value is.”

More than 50 deals brokered by the FDIC to absorb losses at small banks affected by the financial crisis still remain in place. These agreements to assume the risk of loans and other assets from the consolidation of failed banks are known as “loss-shares,” and are an important inducement for healthy banks to take over busted institutions.

The FDIC brokered the sale of Alabama’s Colonial BancGroup Inc.’s (OTC: CBCGQ) deposits to BB&T after Colonial failed. It also agreed to help BB&T buy Colonial’s $15 billion portfolio of loans and other assets and absorb over 80% of any future losses. Under the deal, BB&T’s losses are capped at $500 million and – in the unlikely event the entire portfolio becomes worthless – the FDIC is on the hook to cover the rest.

The FDIC sees these deals as a way to keep loans and other assets in the private sector, as well as mitigate the cost of cleaning up the industry.

It would cost the FDIC considerably more to simply liquidate the assets of failed banks, especially with more than 400 banks on its “problem list.” Loss-share deals will cost $11 billion less than if the agency seized assets and sold them, The Journal said, citing the FDIC.

So far this year, 109 banks have failed – quadruple the amount of failures in 2008. The FDIC’s recouping any lost money from the loss-share deals, many of which are in place for up to 10 years, is dependent on the recovery of the economy

Some worry that bankers may tire of the partnerships with the FDIC and not work toward fixing bad loans because the bulk of the losses will fall to the government. But agency officials maintain that because banks still have a “material” exposure, they will be reluctant to do this.

“There is certainly an incentive for the banks to play fair and do right, but there is never a limit on the ability of the private sector to shift cost to the government,” former FDIC general counsel John Douglas told The Journal.

A typical deal has the FDIC agreeing to cover 80% of future losses on a big portion of the assets, and 95% on the rest. However, the FDIC does not expect to see the 95% scenario play out on any of the deals it has made so far.

Source: U.S. Turning Profit on TARP, but Big Loans Remain in Banks’ Hands

Good day… And a Terrific Tuesday to you! First day back yesterday was a killer for yours truly… Went home, and went to sleep… But, I’m back today, and feeling good. I did something to my left knee on vacation that left me hobbling, and leaning on my cane more than I usually do. But today, it seems a bit better, so I’ve got that going for me!

Yesterday, I left you with the euro popping back and forth over the 1.43 level… But in a wink of an eye, the 1.43 level was gone, and the euro was trading with a 1.44 level, and remained there the rest of the day, reaching 1.4420 for the high… As I turn on the screens this morning, I see that the single unit has gone to popping back and forth over the 1.44 level… You don’t think it will get another sling-shot higher today do you?

I don’t… I was actually shocked to see that move yesterday… But then, I did say that the bias to sell dollars had really picked up steam lately. The piece of data that really pushed the dollar lower yesterday, was actually a “good piece of data” for the U.S. economy… The ISM Index (manufacturing) came in higher than expected and has reached a pre-Lehman Bros collapse level of 48.9… This was a BIG move from the previous month’s 44.8… It’s still below the “line in the sand figure” of 50, which is the indicator of contraction or expansion… I would say given the move from 44.8 to near 49, that expansion is already happening…

And why would that be given the rot on the U.S. economy’s vine? Ahhh grasshopper… Here’s a key ingredient, that I’ve pointed out to you for years now… The dollar… The dollar, measured by the dollar index has lost 13.4%… The dollar index, in case your new to class or have forgotten a previous lesson, is a basket of U.S. trading partner’s currencies. It is heavily weighted toward euros though… And therefore you have one of the reasons I always talk about the euro being the Big Dog… That, and the fact that the euro is the second most liquid trading currency in the world, and… It’s the offset currency to the dollar!

And… So… Here’s a note to the dollar bulls… Mess with this, and you’ll see manufacturing go right back into the dumpster!

But, what about this ISM Index? Pretty strong, I would say, given all that’s going on in not only the U.S. but the world. Going back to yesterday’s discussion about the recession coming to an end. This is one of the key pieces of data that will indicate to me that we have hit bottom and the bounce is on… I know that I have been pretty cynical of the forecasters that were calling for the bounce 6 months ago and so on, but if we get more of this type of data in the coming weeks, I’ll have to put a different cap on…

OK… The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) met last night, and as expected they left their internal interest rates unchanged. The RBA did move their bias for interest rates from easing to neutral, which is a natural progression to the next step of beginning a rate hike cycle. The RBA wasn’t in the mood to go “all in” on the move to neutral though… They hedged their move by saying that, “the present accommodative setting of monetary policy is appropriate given the economy’s circumstances.” That’s Central Bank parlance for “we’re doing this now, but we’re prepared to go back to easing should the economy’s rebound falter”…

So, the A$ was not able to push higher, as would normally be expected if the Central Bank would have gone “all in” on the move higher in bias… The A$ is hovering around 84-cents these days, which isn’t shabby considering that on March 1st of this year it was trading with a 63-cent handle! Still not the “go-go” days of summer 2008, when the A$ was knocking at the door of parity to the green/peachback.

The A$’s rise from the ashes of Feb 2008 is dragging kiwi along. The New Zealand dollar / kiwi saw the same kind of bloodletting the A$ did last fall, so any dragging higher is a welcome sight to kiwi holders. I’m still not sold on kiwi’s ability to maintain the levels it reached last year, given their deficit position… For those of you new to class, the kiwi was able to rise in the fact of a HUGE deficit, because of their interest rate differential to the rest of the world. New Zealand had the highest interest rates in the industrialized world, and those interest rates kept the blinders on their deficit… But, I kept warning folks that once the rates began to drop the Deficit would be as obvious as a man with a hatchet in his forehead!

So… The any dragging is good news to the kiwi holders…

OK… Back in the U.S., the Treasury announced that they would need to borrow less than originally forecast in the 3rd QTR by $109 Billion… They’ll still need to borrow over $400 Billion, and will keep the pace of the total borrowings through the end of the fiscal year (September) at $1.39 Trillion…

The Treasury is borrowing less, because a handful of Big Banks are repaying their TARP loans… That’s a good thing, I guess… But I just can’t get a warm and fuzzy about the stories I keep reading regarding this whole deal of loaning money and buying back their bad assets so they can repay the loans to the Treasury… It’s all mish-mashed folks… But! I’m not going there! I’m keeping my nose to the task at hand, and not veering off course…

The thing to take from this is that the Treasury will still need to borrow $1.39 Trillion in the past year, with the borrowings gaining momentum in the past 6 months… And this total amount of borrowings is what’s weighing on the appetite for Treasuries by foreigners…

Did you see where Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) just issued $1 Billion in bonds but denominated them in yen? Is there a message there? I believe there is a message there, folks… Now, if we begin to see more Corporations doing this, then the message will be loud and clear. These Corporations don’t believe they can sell their debt denominated in dollars, as the world is choking on dollars right now… When and if other Corporations begin to do this, we’ll see the dollar get sold like ponchos on a rainy day at Disney World!

OK… Let’s not go down that road of gloom and doom… Instead let’s talk about a currency that’s moved higher while remaining in stealth mode… The Canadian dollar / loonie… Ever since the Bank of Canada’s Gov. said earlier this month that he was going to do whatever he needed to do to keep the loonie weak… The loonie has taken off on a moons hot! In fact, the loonie just hit a 10-month high VS the green/peachback!

And, not meaning to place the Chuck’s kiss of death on these currencies, but this scene has played out in other places too… In Canada, Switzerland, and Brazil, each respective country’s Central Bank Gov. issued warnings about keeping their currency weak… In all three, the exact opposite has happened. And I have to smile about that, because… You may recall me calling out today’s currency traders as not having the cojones to take on Central Banks, as opposed to the currency traders of yesteryear who would take it as a personal challenge to defeat a Central Banker that put down a line in the sand on a currency’s level…

So… It may all be a coinquidink, that these three currencies are rallying after their Central Bank Governors said they would keep their respective currencies weak… But I doubt it!

I see that Gold and Silver are back on the rally tracks again… Gold is trading over $950 again… And the price of Oil has jumped too ($70.67)… Commodities are all on the rise, once again as risk appetite really begins to grow. The Chinese have ignited the fire on Commodities with their economic growth and demand for the raw materials, and with that thought, commodity traders are jumping on the bandwagon…

I suspect we’ll see some profit taking today in the currencies and commodities though… But that’s OK! Bring them back a bit, give everyone that was sitting on the sidelines waiting for an opportunity to buy, a chance to do so, and then move on to higher ground! That sounds like a plan! And you know what I like to say… I love it when a plan comes together!

Currencies today 8/4/09: A$ .8395, kiwi .6665, C$ .9365, euro 1.4390, sterling 1.6935, Swiss .9410, rand 7.8325, krone 6.0475, SEK 7.1625, forint 185.70, zloty 2.86, koruna 17.95, yen 94.60, sing 1.4330, HKD 7.75, INR 47.71, China 6.8296, pesos 13.13, BRL 1.8250, dollar index 77.66, Oil $70.67, 10-year 3.62%, Silver $14.12, and Gold… $953.50

That’s it for today… I hope you have a Terrific Tuesday!

Chuck Butler

Source: U.S. Manufacturing Is Recovering…