It’s worth noting that Monday’s auction for 3-year debt was met with ravenous, near-record demand and that Tuesday’s 10-year sale met a bid-to-cover ratio of 2.8… historically high for the 10-year, but not even close to the 3.3 ratio for the shorter dated bonds the day before.

“The market is sending many errant signals right now,” notes Dan Amoss. “U.S. policymakers are trying to reinflate stocks, houses and wages, while also recapitalizing an undercapitalized banking system with overt and covert subsidies. All of these actions are extraordinarily costly — so costly that creditors are getting nervous.

For the rest of the article, read Ian Mathias at The Daily Reckoning.

…how does it all work?

We’re doing some serious thinking this week. What is it that actually causes a depression? A stock market collapse? Or too much debt? How come government can appear to cure the problem sometimes – 2001-2007 – but not other times? How come the Japanese were not able to increase consumer prices? Even now… Japan’s inflation rate is negative. And how come, despite the most massive effort at monetary inflation ever undertaken, the US bond market still forecasts an inflation rate of less than 2%?

An interview with Richard Koo, author of ‘The Balance Sheet Recession,’ and a new book by Ken Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart are helping us understand what it going on. More to come…

In the meantime, the Dow went down 42 points on Friday. Gold dropped $7. Still no sign of the Chinese coming to the rescue in the gold market.

“Global rally shows signs of running out of steam,” says the Financial Times.

Reuters says the job data will “test the rally.” The New York Times says the ratio between job seekers and jobs available has never been worse.

The Wall Street Journal, on the other hand, tells us that greater than expected profits will support the rally. So far, the increase in stock prices has not come from increased earnings. It’s come from increased P/Es… based on the hope of higher earnings. In terms of forecast earnings, the Dow is selling at a P/E ratio of 27. But in terms of actual, reported earnings… the ratio is 180.

A friend made the mistake of asking us what to expect from the economy. We said it would go do down.

“You mean, you expect a W-shaped recovery,” he said… “a double-dip recession?”

“No… we expect no recovery at all. It’s a W without the last stroke… ”

Of course, we were exaggerating. But not much. We do not think that the economy of the Bubble Era can ever be revived. It will never recover; because it is dead.

But that doesn’t mean we will march backward forever. The economy may lose 10% of GDP… maybe 20%. But we do not expect to be slithering in the mud of the Middle Ages, with each man planting his own wheat and brewing his own beer. No, not at all. It only means that the depression must continue until it comes to an end.

“But when will it come to an end?” you ask.

“When it is over.”

A depression ends when it has done its work. It must correct mistakes. It must punish errors. It must destroy the bubble economy… and the mindset of the Bubble Era. Only then can new real, sustainable growth begin again.

So far, in 2009, 95 banks have gone broke. How many more need to go broke before the depression is over? We don’t know. This is where is gets complicated. Because the feds are determined to keep us from finding out!

Here’s how it works. The Fed lends the bankers money. Then, the bankers turn around and lend it back to the feds. The banks are happy; they’re making money on a risk-free trade. The regulators are happy; what could be safer in a bank’s vault than US Treasury bonds? Investors are happy; it looks like the financial sector is making money again. And the feds are happy; they’re able to finance their deficits.

Who’s not happy? So far, so good. But hold on…

“This is not a sustainable recovery,” says fund manager Crispin Odey in the Financial Times.

What a spoilsport! You mean, you can’t build a lasting recovery on debt and shell-game finance?

Nope. Apparently not. Just look at what has happened to the auto industry. The feds borrowed money to help Americans pimp up their rides. And this Thursday, when September sales figures come out, we find out how sustainable that boost was. Many Americans got new wheels. But now they don’t need new wheels. And now the feds are out of the auto-incentive business. So now we get to see what happens next.

“Oh Daddy, I felt so sorry for Annabel… ”

Maria was on the phone. She was telling about one of her friends… and money worries…

“She was sitting on the couch. And all of a sudden she burst into tears. She was crying because she is out of money…

“Her car broke down and she doesn’t have the money to get it fixed. And she had to go and have some medical work done. She just doesn’t have any money left…

“And she’s already working all she possibly can. She works with me at the studio. And she picks up bartending jobs on the side. She works all day… and then works at night too. But I think it is getting to her. She just can’t go on…

“I asked her if her folks could help her out. But she said that her father lost his job in the recession… and they don’t have any money to lend her.

“Honestly, I felt so lucky to have you behind me. I don’t know what I would do if I didn’t have the family supporting me. I guess I just wouldn’t be able to keep going either. I’d have to give up the idea of being an actress because it’s almost impossible to support yourself and still go to all the castings and try-outs.”

Elizabeth added a comment:

“I was talking to [a French friend]. He thinks it is typically American to expect each generation to make it on its own. Americans think they should put aside enough money to pay their retirements, and that’s all. They don’t worry about their children. They think the children should take care of themselves. Anyway, that’s what he thinks Americans think… and he’s probably mostly right about it.

“The French attitude is much different. They keep the children closer… and help them more. He’s got five children and he wants to be able to leave them something. He’s just begun a new business venture, because he says he wasn’t able to earn enough in his job.

“He makes a good point: when you have to start from nothing, you just won’t get as far. You know, it’s a bit like what Newton said. He was able to make spectacular progress because, as he put it, he could ‘stand on the shoulders of giants.’ But that’s true for everything. One generation stands on the work of the one that came before it. And if there is nothing to stand on… they have to start from scratch. They are able to do more… if they have a firm foundation to stand on. And there are somethings they couldn’t do at all without it. Maria, for example, would be forced to get a more serious job, if we weren’t helping her with her bills while she’s getting established. And Jules, too. He wants a career in music. But if he couldn’t count on us to help him, he’d probably have to do something that pays better now.

“There’s a lot to be said for the American can-do emphasis on self-reliance. But there’s something to be said for the French attitude too. The ideal is to give your children the spirit of self-reliance and the confidence that comes from making it on their own… but also to give them something to work with… so they don’t have to start at the very bottom.”

Until tomorrow,

Bill Bonner

Source: Correcting Mistakes and Punishing Errors

The first time around, the three-headed federal serpent – the Bush administration, the Treasury Department and the U.S. Federal Reserve – used Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) to “legitimize” trillions of dollars worth of toxic financial waste known as subprime mortgages.

The result was the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression – a mess that was global in nature.

And we’re now headed for a repeat performance.

Some of the players may have changed since the first subprime-mortgage crisis, but the game apparently remains the same. With banks currently unwilling to lend, the new federal triumvirate of the Obama administration, the Treasury and the Fed are trying to inflate the moribund U.S. housing market. This time around, however, the FHA is the weapon of choice.

Obama & Co. are making an all-or-nothing bet that the U.S. economy will recover and bail out the housing market before the final bill for this ill-advised gambit comes due.

When this bubble bursts – and it will – U.S. taxpayers will be on the hook for more than $1 trillion in government-guaranteed debt.

Ginnie Mae: Fannie and Freddie’s Once-Quiet Cousin

As a direct result of the real-estate meltdown, U.S. banks have become reluctant lenders. And they’ve raised their loan standards considerably. Federal officials knew they had to keep the mortgage spigot open, especially to suspect borrowers, so they turned to their new “secret weapon” – the FHA.

The FHA has been cranking out new government-insured subprime loans, which it packages into government guaranteed securities for sale to banks. This frightening reflation of the subprime bubble is being engineered for two key reasons:

• To put a floor under falling house prices.
• And to let banks swap toxic Fannie and Freddie securities for new toxic debt that is 100% guaranteed by U.S. taxpayers.

The almost inevitable insolvency of the FHA could rapidly undermine the fragile recovery of the U.S. economy. And it could plunge stock prices and bank viability to new lows.

Why the FHA?

That’s simple. In an era of increasingly stringent lending standards, the FHA’s standards are laughably lax.

Created by the National Housing Act of 1934, the FHA insures private mortgage lenders against borrower default on residential real estate loans. But its current allure is that it opens the door to prospective homebuyers who almost certainly wouldn’t qualify for a conventional home mortgage. These are buyers with no credit history, a history of credit problems, or not enough cash to cover the down payment and closing costs.

The FHA has quadrupled its insurance guarantees on mortgages in just the last three years, with the bulk of that growth coming in the past two years. Currently, the FHA insures $560 billion of mortgages.

Loans that are FHA-insured are pooled and packaged into mortgage-backed securities (MBS) by the Government National Mortgage Association, more commonly known as Ginnie Mae. Ginnie Mae insures the actual MBS pools composed of FHA loans. Ginnie Mae securities are the only mortgage-backed securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

Two weeks ago, Ginnie Mae proudly announced that it had issued a monthly record $43 billion in FHA mortgage-backed securities, and through the end of July held guaranteed securities with a value of $680 billion. It is on track to exceed $1 trillion worth of guaranteed securities by the end of calendar year 2010.

Ginnie Mae is a cousin of its better-known siblings Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Those two mortgage giants are technically insolvent, and were forced into government conservatorship at the height of the financial crisis – ostensibly due to concerns that foreign central banks in China, Japan, Europe, the Middle East and Russia might stop buying our bonds. As “government-sponsored enterprises,” or GSEs, Fannie and Freddie were only supposed to have the “implicit” backing of the U.S. government. But recent events have shown these to be fully backed by taxpayers.

The implosion of Fannie and Freddie severely threatened the mortgage market. It essentially shut down the two giant repositories that bought the loans banks and mortgage originators didn’t want to hold as assets on their own balance sheets.

The FHA and its mortgage-backed securities “factory” – Ginnie Mae – have taken up where Fannie and Freddie left off, and are now the dumping ground for toxic mortgages. Using the FHA is the core strategy in the administration’s misguided effort to prop up mortgage origination and modifications, real estate prices and insolvent banks.

Warning Signals?

Administration officials might want to take heed of some eerie parallels between the current situation and the one involving Fannie and Freddie. They could serve as an early warning system.

First and foremost, the FHA has already started to acknowledge systemic fraud in its business. In the earlier subprime crisis, similar circumstances led to the revelation of massive fraud in the issuance, packaging, ratings and sale of subprime toxic mortgage-backed securities.

On Aug. 4, the FHA suspended Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp., one of its largest approved independent mortgage originators, from making anymore FHA-backed loans. The suspension came one day after federal investigators raided Taylor Bean’s Ocala, Fla., headquarters.

Since 2007, the value of FHA-backed loan originations underwritten by Taylor, Bean had soared 117%. By contrast, the origination of conventional loans by the firm dropped 34% over the same period. Taylor, Bean subsequently filed for bankruptcy.

Earlier this summer, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which oversees the FHA, raised concerns about FHA practices. On June 18, HUD released an internal inspector general’s report that revealed that the FHA’s default rate exceeded 7% and that more than 13% of its insured loans were delinquent by more than 30 days.

In a “Review and Outlook” piece, The Wall Street Journal reported that the FHA’s reserve fund dropped from 6.4% in 2007 to about 3% today, putting it dangerously close to its mandated 2% minimum. That translates to a “33-to-one leverage ratio, which is into Bear Stearns territory,” the newspaper report stated, referring to the now-failed investment bank that had been a central player in the original subprime mortgage crisis.

Bear Stearns is now owned by JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM).

The HUD inspector general’s report stated that the agency’s growth makes it “vulnerable to exploitation by fraud schemes” and that it may need “Congressional appropriation intervention.”

In a recent article – “FHA Disputes Whispers of Capital Reserve Problems” – on the Mortgage News Daily Web site, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan said in June that “there’s a better than even chance that we will stay above the two percent reserve threshold. That suggests, not just for the 2010 business, but overall for the portfolio, that we’ll more than likely to stay out of a broader need for any taxpayer funding.”

It may be more than a little disheartening to know that in a very uncertain economic environment, precisely due to fraud in mortgage lending and increasing borrower defaults, that our government is stretching a 50/50 wager on the backs of taxpayers.

That’s only part I of the FHA dilemma story.

Part II is even more frightening.

A Look Ahead

Banks are dumping Fannie and Freddie-backed securities onto the Fed’s balance sheet and replacing them on their own balance sheets with FHA-insured loans packaged into government-insured securities issued by Ginnie Mae. Banks aren’t reducing their net assets, they are aggressively swapping acknowledged toxic securities that no-one wants for a new variety that no one will want in the future. Why?

It’s not just that Ginnie Maes are fully backed by the U.S. taxpayers and Fannie and Freddie’s securities are only implicitly backed. All of them will be covered by taxpayers.

The devil is in the details.

Because Fannie and Freddie securities are only implicitly guaranteed, banks that hold these securities as assets on their balance sheets must “haircut,” or set aside reserves, based on a 20% risk-weighting assigned to the value of those holdings.

Because Ginnie Maes are explicitly 100% guaranteed, they are considered “risk free,” and on par with U.S. Treasury bonds, notes and bills. There is no reserve requirement, or haircut, on Ginnie Mae securities.

By replacing their asset mix and holding Ginnie Maes, banks don’t have to set aside reserves. They can use the money they otherwise would have to set aside to actually leverage-up their balance sheets. And guess what they’re buying?

More Ginnie Maes, naturally.

The effect of the asset swap – basically one toxic pool for a replacement that’s not much better – creates the illusion that banks have healthier balance sheets and that they are meeting their reserve requirements. It’s such a good deal for the banks and actively promoted by the Fed and Treasury, that banks are using Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) money to buy Ginnie Maes.

But it’s all a façade.

Capital ratios are being manipulated and insolvent banks are being propped up.

The danger of relying on the FHA to prop up the shaky housing market by facilitating mortgage origination, modifications and refinancing to less-than-stellar borrowers will only result in more subprime loans being stockpiled on the Federal Reserve balance sheet.

Eventually, defaults will overwhelm the FHA. And the hoped-for floor in residential real estate pricing will be pulled out from under us all. The next down-round in real-estate values will expose bank balance sheets for what they really are: Over-leveraged and over-stuffed with junk. Already on the ropes, banks will lose capital and will have to tighten the credit screws on consumer borrowers even more.

We may be headed for another bruising round of real-estate and MBS-related depreciation. Even a mild financial-markets setback could put the economy and the stock market onto the canvas for a 10-count. Further pummelling of shaky consumer confidence accompanied by a couple of major bank failures could easily send the U.S. market down for the financial-system equivalent of a TKO.

Taxpayers, always the lowly cornermen holding the spit buckets, are already in place with the safety nets. We will catch the FHA loans because we insure private lenders against subprime borrowers with no skin in the game. We then will have to catch the buyers of Ginnie Maes, because we guarantee those MBS securities. And we will be forced to catch the falling banks, because we already insure depositors through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC).

Perhaps our ultimate fate is that of the permanently punchdrunk veteran boxer, who rues his decision to stay in the game, realizing that he fought “one bout too many.” If that’s the case, that “one bout too many” could be Subprime Crisis II, arranged by the very market referees whose job it was to protect us from such beatings.

Source: How the Government is Setting Us Up for a Second Subprime Crisis

Fortunately for us, we foresaw this scenario a while ago. On April 20, I recommended that investors diversify their portfolios by adding the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSE: GLD).  The fund is up about 14% since that recommendation, but it’s not yet time to sell, as there are still a number of factors working in gold’s favor.

For starters, there is more and more talk of the U.S. dollar losing some of its luster as a reserve currency.  But this debate is moot for the moment.  The reality is that it will take a long time to reduce the preeminent role of the dollar as the store of value of choice for central banks around the world.

Earlier in March and later in June, Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of the People’s Bank of China made a pitch for the creation of an international global currency delinked from sovereign currencies.  This increased speculation about the probability of China deemphasizing the dollar within their extraordinary high foreign reserves of almost $2 trillion.

Some 64% of global reserves are in U.S. dollars, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). So if China and other holders of U.S. debt were to reduce their holdings, it would have a substantial impact on the greenback’s value, as well as on U.S. interest rates, given that those countries would be selling U.S. Treasuries.

Zhou suggested the use of the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) as an alternative. The SDR is a currency linked to a basket of four major international currencies in the following approximate weightings: U.S. dollar (44%), euro (34%), Japanese yen (11%) and British pound (11%).

But the reality is that this would be highly impractical. To begin with, there are almost no instruments denominated in SDRs that China and other countries could invest their reserves.  And if the IMF issues the instruments, then it would be taking the other side of the trade, which means it would have to start lending in SDRs, too.  This is very unlikely.

Furthermore, no other currency on the planet is large enough to serve as the world’s main reserve currency.  The sole exception, in terms of having a comparable size of the economy, is the euro.  The euro serves 16 members countries of the European Union (EU) and a few others peg their currency to it.  But the problem with the euro is that even though the entire EU is comparable in size to the United States, it is comprised of many countries with very different fundamental strengths and weaknesses.

Therefore, each of these countries issues bonds and each of these, by themselves, are too small and offer too little liquidity for central banks to accumulate as reserves.

But right now – given the large size of the current and projected U.S. deficits and the easy monetary policy – the incentives for holding dollars have diminished.  The risk that inflationary pressures will build up next year, and in turn lead to higher interest rates, are not negligible, even though the U.S. Federal Reserve keeps assuring the markets that it will stifle these pressures before they materialize.

Last Friday, John Taylor, a renowned economist and an expert in monetary policy, opined that the Fed would need to start raising interest rates in early 2010 in order to stem price pressures.

In the meantime, emerging markets such as China and Russia complain about the vulnerabilities of the U.S. dollar.  But these visible complaints have to be construed merely as verbal intervention.  These countries are acting in their own self-interest, because they have very large holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds.  They are trying to “encourage” both the Fed and the U.S. government to act very prudently and conservatively with monetary and fiscal policy.

The United States has offered plenty of assurances to China that it will remain vigilant about inflation. But the trick is being able to identify these inflationary pressures and to take action way before the actual inflationary pressures become entrenched in the economy.  And the Fed will need to rely on its projections to do that.

In this uncertain environment, making economic projections is much easier said than done.  And one would rather err on the side of being a bit late in raising interest rates and reducing quantitative easing. If the Fed is slower than needed, and some inflationary pressures build, it they can resort to raising rates a bit faster and resolve the problem. But if the central bank raises rates – and reduces the quantitative easing policy too soon – it could send the economy into another recession.

This could be problematic since it would increase the risk of the U.S. economy falling into a deflationary spiral and put additional pressure on the U.S. financial system.  Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume that the Fed has greater incentive to err on the lenient side than on the hawkish side.

Remember that we are not out of the woods by any means.  Unemployment, which is a lagging indicator, is still increasing and there are many other large problems to resolve in the economy. Without even considering the impact that healthcare reform will have on the U.S. budget deficit, we see the following important headwinds:

• Consumers are very weak.  It’s not just the jobless that have been affected.  The uncertainty about continued employment for those who still have jobs led to an increase savings rates as would be consumers postpone spending.
• The huge drop in home prices has put about one in four homes in an “upside down” mortgage situation. That means consumers cannot sell their houses without taking a loss, and cannot borrow against their homes to make other expenditures.
• The drop in home values has had another effect:  It has increased the need for consumers to save.  This need has been reinforced by the large hit to 401(k) savings and other retirement plans.  As a result, savings rates have zoomed to 7% of personal income. The savings rate could even hit 10% as consumers strive to rebuild their nest eggs.  Additionally, the “Baby Boom” generation has saved too little and retirement is just around the corner.  Consumers make some two thirds of the U.S. economy, so this new predisposition to saving will be a drag on consumption for a long time.
• Capacity utilization is still low, which greatly reduces producer pricing power.  This, along with very high unemployment, gives the Fed time for now.  Low capacity utilization also keeps investments in factory expansion low.
• Recent banking data revealed that many smaller U.S. banks will be closing their doors, taxing the already overstretched resources of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), which will have to be recapitalized, adding to the U.S. fiscal deficit.
• We have not yet seen the fallout from the commercial real estate drop, which Money Morning has warned will be severe.  Since the U.S. consumer is not buying as much, many properties will not be able to keep up with their payments and will default on their loans.  Commercial real estate generally follows the trends in residential real estate with one or two years of lag.
• Last, but not least, we are going to see an economic acceleration in the United States in the third quarter, but that acceleration might be driven to a large extent by inventory rebuilding.  The U.S. economy will probably surprise to the upside in the third quarter with growth.  Among other things, the government’s Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS), popularly known as “Cash for Clunkers,” should show up positively in the numbers.  But once the levels of inventories are brought up to their necessary levels, that extra growth will not be present in the following quarter.  And the demand from Cash for Clunkers will cease to be a factor.

All of these reasons warrant caution for the Fed.  Some economists, including Nobel Prize winner and former World Bank Chief Economist Joseph Stiglitz, have highlighted the risk of a “W-shaped” recession/recovery scenario, and have even suggested the need for another stimulus package.  While that might do more harm than good, this position highlights the dovish bias that the Fed is likely to maintain.

What About the Rest of the World?

China enjoys many degrees of freedom to move its economy forward and has had resounding success in doing so.  It has no debt and more than $2 trillion in foreign currency reserves.  Its banking system is small in relation to the size of its economy, which gives the country a lot of room to expand credit, and the savings rate of its consumers is sky-high.  This leaves China with the capital resources to deploy growth strategies.  Since the largest companies are all government-owned, when the government decides to deploy capital, it gets done swiftly and powerfully throughout the economy, with great effect on growth.

As a result, China’s economy grew at the breakneck annualized pace of 14% in the second quarter.

Other emerging markets, like Brazil and India, are in similar, though not as potent, positions to move their economies forward. And they are doing so aggressively. India is expected to post on average 7% plus of annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth.

Emerging economies – those that did not splurge the bonanza of the prior five years of strong growth in commodity prices and other exports — are now in the position of stimulating their economies with easy monetary and fiscal policies.

Massive stimulus packages, the scorching demand growth from capital investments, and reborn consumers in emerging Asia, have combined to rekindle global growth.

Resurgent Growth in Europe

Both Europe and Japan are emerging from their recessions – even though Japan may post a negative growth number in the fourth quarter – and Britain and Italy are lagging behind in the recovery.  But the most important European economies, led by Germany and France, are pulling ahead.

It is understandable that European Central Bank (ECB) President Jean Claude Trichet, recently mentioned that the recovery was uneven in Europe.  Most market pundits took this as a sign that Europe would not be raising rates as fast as previously anticipated.

However, keeping interest rates low is much harder to do than it is to say.  Unlike the Fed, which has symmetric objectives – promoting economic growth and controlling inflation – the ECB’s only mandate is to control inflation.  The reason for this notable difference in objectives is that the European economy is much less flexible than the American economy, mainly due to its very rigid labor laws and other regulations.

Thus, the Europeans start running into inflationary problems when their economy grows above 2.5%.

The ECB just raised its own growth forecasts.  Similarly, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which comprises the 30 most influential free-market representative democracies, indicated that the global recession is coming to an end much faster then they previously thought, but said that the recovery will rely on massive spending and low interest rates for some time.  The OECD cited the strong rebound in Asian economies as having jumpstarted this global reacceleration.

Because the Federal Reserve will have to err on the cautious side, and because of the institutions’ differing mandates, the ECB will probably tighten monetary policy before the U.S. central bank does. That means the euro and emerging market currencies will keep appreciating against the U.S. dollar and the price of gold will soar.

The protests that will come from time to time from Chin and Russia will be just that: verbal intervention.  They will not resort to sudden changes in the composition of their foreign reserves, at the risk of doing further damage to the dollar.

In fact, China and other countries generate some 90% of their large current account surpluses in U.S. dollars.  But their holdings of dollar-denominated assets are only about 64% of their total reserves.  That means they already consistently sell the difference, and this selling so far has not decimated the dollar.

So do not expect a sudden devaluation of the greenback, nor fear China currency reallocations.

But we can and do expect a gradual weakening of the U.S. dollar to occur next year.

And as much as we all hate it, we will be able to take comfort in the fact that we avoided a much worse evil: Deflation.

So we are going to remain playing it with gold.  Also, this “currency” play gives us added diversification to the portfolio.

Source: Buy, Sell or Hold: The SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSE: GLD) Continues to Offer Investors a Hedge Against Inflation

Good day… And a Wonderful Wednesday to you! When I signed off yesterday morning, I told you that I was watching a mini-rally in the currencies. Well, that mini-rally turned into a real rally as the morning went along. Especially, after the risk assets got a boost from the Consumer Confidence revival. Yes, Brother Love’s traveling salvation show revival, a.k.a. Consumer Confidence was much stronger than forecast, and the risk assets took off!

By mid-afternoon, the euro was pushing 1.4350, and all the “little dogs” were following along with their own version of a rally VS the dollar. But a funny thing happened on the way to the forum, and profit taking set in… Oh brother! Can’t these guys wait until there is really a BIG move before they take profits? Oh well, I know, you’re saying, “But Chuck, don’t you always say that it’s not a profit until you take it?” Yes, that’s correct… But the rest of us just want to have a diversifying asset in our investment portfolio, and are not interested in 1/2 euro moves to take a “profit”!

This morning, German Business Confidence, as measured by the think tank, IFO, printed an increase in the index number for the 5th consecutive month! The index number rose from 87.4 in July to 90.5 this month. I would say that it was quite the move, eh? Given the exports data I gave you yesterday, you can see why German Business Confidence is strong… And I’ll tell you something… Perception or Sentiment toward an economy, is half the battle folks…

Now, I had a few emails from readers yesterday responding to the note I made about Germany’s economy rebounding, and putting the recession in the rear view mirror… The readers all said that the economy is not as strong as it appears, and that after the upcoming elections, things will be different. Hmmm… Well, I guess you can decide for yourself, which camp you want to be in… Me? I’m going to remain in the “recession is over for Germany camp”…

I know, I know, the recovery is nascent at best, but come on! It’s better than a sharp stick in the eye! OUCH! BTW… I noticed that Chris used one of my fave words, “nascent”, last week… He’s probably read the word in the Pfennig so many times over the years, that it is burned into his brain!

OK… Back to currencies… There was a radio interview on Bloomberg yesterday with a panel of investment strategists, and some were of the opinion that, and tell me if this at all sounds familiar, the dollar will continue to weaken this year as the global economy recovers from recession and investors seek currencies linked to growth…

The idea was simply that too many investors had cash tied up in T-Bills, and T-Notes, and that as the global economies recover ahead of the U.S. there will be higher yields to be gotten in those global economies. So, when the investors sell their T-Bill and T-Notes to buy overseas, the dollar will get sold, and thus lead it to weaken more and more…

OK… So… How many times have you heard that from me in the past year? Geez Louise, but these strategists will all claim that they came up with this idea first! FAT CHANCE!

Speaking of Treasuries… I sent along a note to Chris the other day, but I think he ran out of room, and then I completely forgot about it yesterday… But once again the U.S. Treasury is going to the well… And they will auction $197 Billion in new Treasuries this week… Is it just me, or does any one else wonder just how much more debt foreigners can choke down? I guess the thing to do this week and next is to check the cartel’s, I mean the Fed Reserve’s balance sheet to see if they take back any of these auctioned Treasuries like they did last month with the 7-year T-Note auction. Monetizing the debt, printing more paper dollars like it’s Monopoly money…

And in a follow up from yesterday’s report on the Budget Deficit being forecast for the next 10 years… The total of the deficit for those 10 years is now forecast to be $9 Trillion dollars… And in a follow up from yesterday’s rant about forecasts… The $9 Trillion is more than $2 Trillion more than was forecast just 6 months ago! Hmmm… Another $9 Trillion!
Hey! A month ago, when I prepared for the Agora Financial Reserve Wealth Symposium in Vancouver, the National Debt stood at a level that put each citizen’s piece of the debt at $37,000… Today, just one month after I pulled that data, each citizen’s piece of the debt now stands at $38,191! That’s absolutely shameful, folks…

In a seldom talked about country, Sweden… They too saw a bump in their Consumer Confidence report for this month. Like their neighbor, Norway, Sweden is beginning to see some real traction in their economy. And it shows when Consumer Confidence bumps higher, when it was forecast to be negative! Sweden’s Riksbank, meets next Thursday, and while I don’t expect any move, I would look for the Riksbank to confirm a positive outlook for the economy…

In Japan… their exports fell for a tenth straight month in July as demand from all of the nation’s major markets deteriorated. Shipments tumbled 36.5 percent from a year earlier, thus once again making my point for me… This is no “safe haven”!

Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) member, Roger Corbett, gave a speech last night, and for my money sounded quite upbeat about the economy! He hedged his upbeat tone a bit by saying that “how consumer demand holds up in light of no consumer stimulus will be one of the determining factors in how quickly our economy in Australia recovers.”

Hmmm… That sounds reasonable to me… In fact it sounds quite OBVIOUS! So… Today, we have a new “Mr. Obvious”… HA!

A research center in China, the Development Research Center, issued a report saying that Chinese economic growth may exceed 10% in the first quarter of next year… The research center believes that China has already passed its worst period for the economy, and will meet the center’s goal of 8% growth this year!

OK… I know there are a lot of skeptics out there regarding the data that China prints… But, it’s what we have to work with! And… I also recall many times over the years, the so-called Chinese experts, would say that that growth was going to stall, only to see stronger growth print… So, for now, I’ll stick with what I see reported, until I see other wise!

Chinese growth is good for commodities… And what’s good for commodities is good for Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Canada, Norway, and South Africa… There’s your lineup for the “resource countries” and what a lineup it is! Wink, wink…

And on that note… I’ll head to the Big Finish!

Currencies today 8/26/09: A$ .8335, kiwi .6840, C$ .9155, euro 1.43, sterling 1.6280, Swiss .9420, rand 7.8340, krone 6.0340, SEK 7.0890, forint 187.25, zloty 2.8675, koruna 17.80, yen 94, sing 1.4425, HKD 7.7505, INR 48.89, China 6.8310, pesos 13.02, BRL 1.8615, dollar index 78.38, Oil $72.20, 10-year 3.62%, Silver $14.35, and Gold… $949.60

That’s it for today… I hope you make your Wednesday, Wonderful!

Chuck Butler

Source: German Business Confidence Continues to Surprise!

This afternoon, we have been invited for a private tour of a grotto not far away. According to our information, the grotto was sealed off by falling rock hundreds of years ago. Thus it was protected and preserved remains of human habitation from 30,000 years ago.

“Yes, there is a span of about 10,000 years in which there is little evidence of human habitation in Europe,” said the owner. “Maybe humans almost died out during that period; we don’t know what happened. But when this cave was opened, we found some remains that were dated from that era. It’s a remarkable find. A group of 20 scientists has been working there all summer. They told me they found 1,000 artifacts a day. Of course, we’re not talking about statues and battle axes. Most of these discoveries are bone fragments… maybe even grains of cereal…”

We’ll find out more this afternoon…

Meanwhile, we turn our attention to the world of money. And we begin by asking:

Just what are we trying to figure out?

Well, we want to understand what is going on… don’t we?

And we want to try to guess about what is likely to happen next, don’t we?

We’d like to know, for example, whether stocks were going up or down… and whether this is a good time to buy property… or gold… or Treasury bonds. We’d like to know, wouldn’t we?

Of course we would. Unfortunately, ‘it is not given to man to know his fate,’ as the ancients put it. All we know is what happened in the past… and the fate of men who came before us… Even that we know only in a wispy, uncertain kind of way. All we have are stories…

For 40,000 years – maybe longer – our ancestors have walked the very earth where your editor puts his feet. They lived. They died. What did they know? Scientists say they were as smart as we are. What did they talk about? What did they think about?

“Every time something is given, something is taken away,” we suggested over dinner last night.

“No, that’s not right. You’re saying that life is a zero-sum game… that it can never get better… that it can never really improve… that there can be no real progress…” Elizabeth replied.

“Well, not exactly… I’m saying that there are no free lunches in nature. That if a man is smarter, he is not likely to be faster too. But I’m not saying anything particular… or scientific… I’m just announcing a general principle… more like a vague intuition about the way things work. According to one theory, for example, mankind migrated from Africa to Europe. In Europe, during the Ice Age, he encountered a great challenge: cold weather. Most humans and pre-humans probably couldn’t survive it. But some did. And they did by evolving into maybe smarter… maybe slower… people with bigger heads. According to the latest thinking on the subject, the bigger brains were a disadvantage in warmer climates… because they got too hot. I guess they took up too much energy too. But they were an evolutionary necessity in colder climates… where the cold weather not only made possible a hotter head, but also made it a necessity. People needed bigger brains to anticipate the change of seasons and save for winter, for example. They had to see what was coming. They had to look at what was coming… and prepare for it. They had to work together too… to hunt large game… and to fight off competitors. Those who couldn’t do so died out. Well… that’s the theory…”

Every day, here at the Daily Reckoning, we give you information on the latest trends and events in financial markets. But everybody has access to the same information. And what is information, anyway? What is it worth? What does it mean?

For thousands of years, people exchanged information. Then, it must have been a different kind of information… things we can barely imagine… about where animals were getting their water… about where to find seeds and how to avoid sickness… how to prepare for winter… and how to fend off wild animals. Then, the dominion of the human species was not so sure. There were saber-toothed tigers, lions, wolves, even mastodons… giant sloths… Early man was probably as often prey as hunter. He had to be on his toes to survive.

Information was one thing. But there was more. He needed wisdom… and technology… as well as facts. He had to learn to store food for winter as well as beat back attacks by wild beasts. He had to know how to make cloaks out of animal skins… and how to stock firewood for a rainy, snowy winter… and how to find shelter.

We imagine tribes sat around the campfire and told stories. The stories reported victories and defeats… disasters and triumphs… heroes and enemies. But the stories were more than just information: they carried lessons… moral lessons… about what to do and what not to do.

That is the tradition to which we are heirs here at the Daily Reckoning. We pass along information: but without a story, the information is just noise.

Our story is the story of the seasons. It’s the story of heroes and villains… of fatal flaws and inevitable disasters.

The common flaw is an old one. The Greeks couldn’t seem to tell a story without mentioning it. ‘Hubris’… the kind of pride that goeth before a fall… the arrogance that leads people to think they can get away with something… that they not only can know their fates… but that they can control them.

Today, Ben Bernanke is our tragic hero. His flaw is as obvious as his challenge. He thinks he can stop the world from turning… stop the seasons… avoid the hard, correcting winter by tempting the sun with bailouts, stimulus and cheap credit. His arrogance is an affront to the gods.

The old tales tell us what will happen. He will fail. But when… how? That is a different story. It is the story future generations must tell. We must live it.

Source: Don’t Count on China

Good day… We had more rain here last night, but the storms have cooled things off and it is starting to feel a bit like fall around here. Chuck flies off to San Francisco today to speak at the Money Show, so I will be bringing you the Pfennig for the next few days. The dollar has rallied just a bit overnight, clawing back some of the losses which occurred mid morning yesterday.

And what, you might asked, caused the dollar to rally yesterday? You can re-read a bit of yesterday’s Pfennig for the answer: “The data cupboard has been emptied out and is looking to get restocked today… So the only thing besides sentiment moving the markets today will be the direction of stocks…” Yes, Chuck was right on in predicting what would drive the currency markets yesterday, as the dollar got sold off as stocks moved higher.

Without any data to push the markets one way or another, investors began moving back into riskier assets, selling their ’safe haven’ US treasury holdings. The currency markets have been trading on the risk theme lately, and don’t seem ready to break this pattern anytime soon. Risk appetite is the main driver of the currency markets, with the dollar gaining with investor worries, and falling back down as investors feel more confident.

I spoke at an investment conference last week in Chicago, and listened to several good presentations on the current state of the economy. While every speaker had differing opinions on how to invest during the next few months, they all seemed to agree on one thing; the recent rally and ‘recovery’ would reverse, and the US will likely head back into another downturn. The timing of this next downturn is hard to pin down, but most believe we will see the US economy falter again toward the first quarter of 2010. If and when this occurs, the dollar could see a temporary rally as investors flee back into US treasuries. But longer term, everyone at the conference was in agreement with what Warren Buffet said in his op-ed piece yesterday: the US$ will ultimately lose value.

Speaking of Buffet, I re-read his op-ed last night during dinner, and had to laugh a bit as much of what he wrote could have been taken directly from the presentation I gave last week. The following lines were especially poignant, so I decided to include them in the Pfennig:

“An increase in federal debt can be financed in three ways: borrowing from foreigners, borrowing from our own citizens or, through a roundabout process, printing money. Let’s look at the prospects for each individually — and in combination.

The current account deficit — dollars that we force-feed to the rest of the world and that must then be invested — will be $400 billion or so this year. Assume, in a relatively benign scenario, that all of this is directed by the recipients — China leads the list — to purchases of United States debt. Never mind that this all-Treasuries allocation is no sure thing: some countries may decide that purchasing American stocks, real estate or entire companies makes more sense than soaking up dollar-denominated bonds. Rumblings to that effect have recently increased.

Then take the second element of the scenario — borrowing from our own citizens. Assume that Americans save $500 billion, far above what they’ve saved recently but perhaps consistent with the changing national mood. Finally, assume that these citizens opt to put all their savings into United States Treasuries (partly through intermediaries like banks).

Even with these heroic assumptions, the Treasury will be obliged to find another $900 billion to finance the remainder of the $1.8 trillion of debt it is issuing. Washington’s printing presses will need to work overtime.

Slowing them down will require extraordinary political will. With government expenditures now running 185 percent of receipts, truly major changes in both taxes and outlays will be required. A revived economy can’t come close to bridging that sort of gap.”

This is what we have been preaching over the past several years, that the deficits, if unchecked, will ultimately lead the government to put the printing presses in overdrive, and we will attempt to inflate our way out of debt. This will cause the value of the US$ to drop. Buffet ended his piece with the following line: “Unchecked carbon emissions will likely cause icebergs to melt. Unchecked greenback emissions will certainly cause the purchasing power of currency to melt. The dollar’s destiny lies with Congress.”

Sorry to spend so much time on Warren Buffet, I know he isn’t the most popular guy with many Pfennig readers. But you can’t deny that he has been an extremely successful investor, and the piece he wrote for the NY Times was just right on in my opinion.

Lets get back to the currency markets. Good news helped propel the Norwegian krone higher overnight. Norway’s economy grew last quarter, pushing the worlds fifth largest oil exporter out of recession. Norway’s mainland economy (ex oil and gas) was able to grow .3% during the second quarter. Economists had predicted Norway’s economy would contract by the same margin. The overall economy still contracted, as oil revenues declined, but the recent move higher in crude should help keep Norway on the growth path in the second half of 2009. Petroleum exports make up a quarter of Norway’s output, so a global recovery is definitely good news for Norway. This currency, which was called the safest in the world by the NY Times, should be part of every investors portfolio.

The UK economy is doing quite as well as Norway’s, as Britain reported a record $13.2 billion budget deficit in July. This is the largest deficit reported for July since records began. Quarterly tax payments usually boost the revenues in July, but the recession has taken its toll on tax revenue, and unemployment benefits are pushing outlays higher. The UK is predicted to have the biggest deficit in the G20 next year according to the IMF. The pound sterling was the largest loser vs. the US$ on the back of this reported deficit.

Minutes of the BOE’s August 6 meeting were released yesterday, and it showed BOE Governor Mervyn King pushed for an even looser monetary policy. King pushed to expand the ‘quantitative easing’ which the BOE began in March. The pound lost more ground after the release of the report, as investors lost faith in King as an inflation fighter.

Chuck sent me this note last night and wanted me to include it in today’s Pfennig:

“I forgot all about the fact that this is that time of year again when Central bankers and economists from around the world have a boondoggle at Jackson Hole Wyoming… You might recall that last year they all hunkered down and tried to think of ways to keep the financial mess forum worsening, only to have Lehman Brothers collapse a few weeks later!

Well… I’m sure we’re going to hear a lot of rhetoric about the “recession coming to an end”… but they have it all wrong! this isn’t a recession it’s a depression…

With pockets of risk remaining, such as the collapsing U.S. commercial real estate market, and the double digit unemployment rate… I would think that these guys who missed seeing the subprime meltdown coming and then when it was presented to them, told us it wouldn’t filter out into the economy… should just keep their opinions to themselves and read newsletters like The Pfennig and The Currency Capitalist, and the Daily Reckoning, and the 5-minute Forecast… OK I’ve had my say, thank you for letting me vent! Have a nice day!”

Yes, the ‘top’ economic minds (minus Chuck) will be meeting in Jackson Hole and Ben Bernanke will undoubtedly trumpet the fact that data shows the US economy is starting to pull out of its recession. This morning we will get the index of US leading economic indicators which is projected to show a move up in July; the fourth consecutive positive monthly move. The weekly jobless claims are also expected to be a bit positive, with a fall to 550k from last weeks 558k. But the jobless rate is still projected to reach double digits (the real number has been in double digits for a while!) and housing will continue to be a drag on the economy.

The administration will also announce the US deficit for 2009 will be slightly less than what was forecast in May. Yes, our government’s deficit will total just $1.58 trillion, about $262 billion less than the previous estimate. But the change isn’t due to increased revenues, it is mainly due to the administration’s scrapping of a $250 billion contingency plan to aid the financial industry. With the recent signs that the economy is starting to pull out of recession, the Obama administration decided it no longer needed to hold the quarter trillion dollars in reserve to meet predicted bank failures. But I would still be a bit worried if I were the administration, as there will likely be a few more ‘big’ bank failures down the road. Personal bankruptcies continue to climb, and as Chuck pointed out above, the commercial real estate market still has a few ’surprises’ in store for the economy.

Even after this adjustment, the deficit figure would amount to 11.2% of the GDP, the largest share since 1945 when we were paying for WWII. And unfortunately, with growing outlays for Social Security, and interest on the debt eating up a larger overall percentage, the deficits won’t be shrinking in the near future.

A jump in oil prices and a reversal of risk aversion caused the South African rand, Mexican peso, and Australian dollar to rally. South Africa led all currencies vs. the US$ overnight, with a .54% appreciation. Mexico’s peso rose for a second day as oil moved back above $72 per barrel. Oil revenue funded 38 percent of the Mexican government’s budget last year, so the peso is somewhat linked to the price of crude. The jump in oil also helped the Canadian dollar reverse earlier losses.

The Australian dollar rallied as risk investors moved back into higher yielding currencies, and good news in the Asian stock markets continued the rally. The Aussie dollar also benefitted from the rally in oil, Australia’s fourth most valuable raw material export. The Aussie dollar is one of the best performers over the past 3 months, with only the New Zealand dollar and Brazilian real out performing it vs. the US$.

Currencies today 8/20/09: A$ .8289, kiwi .6731, C$ .9105, euro 1.4219, sterling 1.6461, Swiss .9376, rand 7.9792, krone 6.055, SEK 7.1810, forint 191.02, zloty 2.9211, koruna 18.009, yen 94.15, sing 1.4477, HKD 7.7508, INR 48.695, China 6.8318, pesos 12.8717, BRL 1.8415, dollar index 78.62, Oil $71.92, 10-year 3.47%, Silver $14.01, and Gold… $943.27

That’s it for today…Hope everyone has a Tub Thumpin Thursday!!

Chris Gaffney

Source: Stocks Push the Currencies Higher…

Here is Warren Buffett’s view:

“Last fall, our financial system stood on the brink of a collapse that threatened a depression. The crisis required our government to display wisdom, courage and decisiveness. Fortunately, the Federal Reserve and key economic officials in both the Bush and Obama administrations responded more than ably to the need.

“They made mistakes, of course. How could it have been otherwise when supposedly indestructible pillars of our economic structure were tumbling all around them? A meltdown, though, was avoided, with a gusher of federal money playing an essential role in the rescue.

“The United States economy is now out of the emergency room and appears to be on a slow path to recovery.”

This is probably the view shared by most economists and most investors. It is not our view. From where we sit there is no recovery underway…and there never will be one. You can recover from a hangover. You can recover from a nasty divorce. You can even recover from an earthquake. But once a depression begins, you can only endure it. Get on with it. Get it over. And then, you can begin rebuilding again. You will never recover the economy you had before the crisis. You must find a new economic model.

A headline from yesterday: “Reluctant shoppers hold back recovery.”

That’s one way to put it. Shoppers don’t have any money. They need to cut back. Most likely, they will cut back until their savings rates reach 10% of disposable income. That will take $1 trillion out of consumer spending. The economy cannot possibly recover under those conditions; it can’t return to its same old, consumer-led, credit-fuelled self. Instead, it must go through a period of transition – in which output is depressed – until it finds a new personality, better suited to the new economic circumstances.

But Buffett is not worried about the depression. He’s worried about how the recovery is financed:

“.. enormous dosages of monetary medicine continue to be administered and, before long, we will need to deal with their side effects. For now, most of those effects are invisible and could indeed remain latent for a long time. Still, their threat may be as ominous as that posed by the financial crisis itself.”

Buffett does the maths. This year, the US deficit will total $1.8 trillion. Since 1920, the largest peacetime deficit was 6% of GDP. This is 13% of GDP. The magnitude of it alone should be cause for alarm. But there’s more. Where does this money come from? Even if you could direct 100% of the net US trade deficit (about $400 billion, the money that ends up in foreigners’ hands as a result of American spending) and 100% of American’s savings (estimated to be about $500 billion), you’d still be $900 billion short.

Desperate borrowers should expect to pay high rates of interest. A borrower who doesn’t need the money can shop for the best rates and hold out for a good deal. But when a person needs to borrow, he takes what the market gives him.

Yet, one of the most curious things about the financial world circa 2009 is the yield on the 10-year Treasury note. It has fallen to under 3.5%. Despite record borrowing by the feds, lenders content themselves with the lowest yields in nearly half a century. Go figure.

The market seems to be anticipating a depression. Why else would bond yields be so low? If the economy sours…and the stock market sinks…the safe yields on Treasury bonds will seem like a good alternative. But Buffett believes the Treasury yields are not as safe as they appear. That other $900 billion has to come from somewhere. And the feds can’t allow interest rates to rise significantly; that would undermine all their stimulus efforts. High real interest rates depress economic activity. So, what can the feds do?

“ Washington’s printing presses will need to work overtime,” says Buffett prophetically.

Of the two ways of financing the deficit, one is a flimflam; the other is robbery. In the great credit expansion consumers borrowed so they could buy things such as automobiles. Now, the feds borrow and bribe the voters with money to buy automobiles. No matter who does it, borrowing for consumption is merely taking from the future. Then, when the future comes…the account has to be settled. Result: no net gain. What was consumed in one year is not consumed in the next.

Of course, the feds don’t spend money the same way consumers did. Consumers wasted their money on frou-frou and watchamacallits of their own choosing. The government wastes money on different things – like turtle crossings and billion-dollar bailouts.

Not that we’re complaining about government spending. We’re just pointing out that it’s not the same as private spending. What makes goods good is that people choose them and buy them with their own money. They get what they’ve got coming. But the feds are spending other peoples’ money. If they get any goods at all it is practically an accident.

But what we’re talking about this morning is the dollar. According to Buffett, the dollar is in danger. He’s worried about the larceny, not the flim-flam. Printing up additional dollars robs savers. Each new dollar created to buy US debt makes each one already in existence – say, in a vault in the Bank of China – worth less than it was before. If that isn’t true, the whole body of economic thinking from Adam Smith to Irving Fisher is nothing but a fantasy. And the only way to protect the value of the dollars held by savers, theoretically, is to withdraw the stimulus money before inflation sends prices soaring.

Buffett is an optimistic fellow. He believes that responsible authorities will turn off their dollar-printing machines in order to protect the greenback. Here at the Daily Reckoning, we’re not so sure.

First, the depression is likely to be worse than people think. This will mask the effects of dollar printing. Plus, it will make the need for more dollars – more federal spending, more US debt – seem more urgent than ever. Instead of pulling the plug, they’ll turn up the speed.

Second, the feds are not really interested in the health of the real economy anyway. This is an insight which is obvious, but one that only came to us recently. When the feds put in place absurd policies to delay and restrain the inevitable correction, they are making things worse, generally, for everyone. But the politicians are responding to their constituents’ demands. One campaign donor wants to keep his business alive. Another wants to keep his job. Still another promises the feds high paying jobs on Wall Street, after their term in Washington is over. Millions of others — more than enough to turn an election – want free pills and mortgage subsidies and so forth. When the feds try to bailout the economy, they are only doing their jobs! They’re not going to stop doing their jobs – especially in a depression – just to protect foreign dollar-holders.

Source: Flim-Flam, Robbery and the Economics of Depression

Today’s “legacy assets” are toxic derivatives; a decade ago it was gold reserves. Both are proving hard to shrug off, but for very different reasons. Both legacies also come thanks to previous central-bank history; the fossils remain only too livid today.

And 10 years from now, if not sooner, just how welcome will the current central bank must-have become – freshly printed government debt, bought with money that doesn’t exist until the central bank wills it?

Seeking first to defend against inflation and war, the West’s central banks built up huge reserves of the ultimate hard money –gold bullion– during the early-to-mid 20th century. Long before the turn of the millennium, however, these hoards grew to look quaint and expensive. Unyielding and relatively useless to industry, gold simply sat there, down in the vaults, costing money to store but returning no interest.

Who needed crisis-proof gold when Western Europe (if not the Balkans or Mid-East) was enjoying its first generation of peace-time in history? And who needed fine gold when the Nasdaq index of tech stocks was priced for 20% annual earnings growth over the next decade and more?

In short, who needed gold when we’d got Alan Greenspan, as the New York Times asked in May 1999. “The argument against retaining gold is that its day is past,” wrote Floyd Norris with uncanny timing, just two days before Gordon Brown’s Treasury announced its ham-fisted sale of half the UK’s gold bullion hoard.

“Once it was useful as a hedge against inflation that would hold its value when paper currencies did not. Now financial markets have their own sophisticated ways, using exotic derivative securities, to hedge against inflation.”

You could butter your toast with the irony. But it wouldn’t taste sweet or provide much nutrition. Whereas a further glance back at history might.

“With huge gold stocks available for sale, [governments] may discourage excessive price increases but naturally do nothing to prevent sharp decreases,” reported an investment piece for Medical Economics published in October 1977. (Our thanks to the author for finding and faxing it to BullionVault this week.)

“The government specter [over the gold market] can’t be expected to disappear quickly,” F.D.Williams continued, some 32 years ago. “Gold will continue to be part of many national reserves for a long time. The stocks are so large, they can’t all be dumped at once.”

Compare and contrast with today’s unwanted bequest – those toxic derivatives the US Treasury chooses to call “legacy assets” as if it played no role at all in producing them. Unlike state-hoarded gold, it only encouraged their creation; it didn’t want to look after the damn things. And quite unlike the market for state-hoarded gold, a ready stock of willing mortgage-bond buyers also looks unlikely to gather.

“The PPIP, which was beset by multiple delays as regulators tried to figure out the best means of removing many of the troubled assets from banks’ books,” as CNN reports, “is still not up and fully running yet.” It’s not been for lack of incentives. The $2 trillion Public-Private Investment Partnership, announced to much fanfare in March, offers huge leverage – entirely at tax-payer expense – plus some or other hold-to-maturity value to risk-cushioned investors, albeit as yet unknown. Private investment groups can use up to $1 of non-recourse loans, plus another dollar of Treasury finance, for every $1 they spend on taking toxic housing derivatives off the banks’ busted balance-sheets. Yet as a report published this week by the Congressional Oversight Panel put it:

“Whether the PPIP will jump start the market for troubled securities remains to be seen. It is also unclear whether the change in accounting rules that permit banks to carry assets at higher valuations will inhibit banks’ willingness to sell. Similarly, it is unclear whether wariness of political risks will inhibit the willingness of potential buyers to purchase these assets.”

Funnily enough, as the US authorities struggle to sell toxic debt, Western Europe’s Central Bank Gold Agreement has also stalled in 2009. This comes, however, despite prices and private-investor demand both holding near record levels. First signed ten years ago this September, back when no one at the New York Times, Economist, Financial Times or big central banks could see a use for the metal (simply owning this secure, liquid store of value is use enough, by the way), the CBGA capped annual gold sales and made them plain in advance for the coming five years. It aimed to avoid a repeat of May 1999, when the UK Treasury’s announcement drove prices down to what then proved their floor. In contrast to Washington’s PPIP, however, central-bank gold sales weren’t arranged in the hope of achieving maximum price, but merely curbing a rush for the exits instead. And as it is, they needn’t have bothered.

Gold prices have since risen three-fold and more against all major currencies, even while the 16 signatories to date sold almost one-fifth of their hoard in aggregate. Thus gold’s weighting in their reserves portfolio has doubled regardless, rising as gold outperformed all other assets from the start of this decade.

Hence the dramatic slowdown in central bank gold sales since the financial crisis began in August ‘07. Because it’s tough selling gold when its use becomes so clear, so present. Here in the fifth and last year of 2004’s renewed CBGA, “Net central banks sales likely to be in the order of 140 tonnes this year, down from 246 tonnes in 2008,” reckons London market-maker Scotia Mocatta. Yet the annual ceiling for CBGA sales currently stands at 500 tonnes!

The new agreement – just signed and due to commence on Sept. 27th – tips its hat to the facts, reducing that limit by one fifth. But who’s left to sell any way? Just as in the gold mining sector worldwide, the “easy metal” has already gone from West Europe’s vaults, pretty much emptying Spain, the UK and those excess Swiss holdings which maintained the Franc’s 100% gold-backing until the turn of this century. The two largest holders, Germany and Italy, continue to face down political calls for “mobilization”, refusing to yield one ounce so far despite signing all three agreements. France, the third largest owner, has pretty much sold the 600 tonnes from its hoard announced when it joined the central-bankers’ Cash4Gold party in 2005. That leaves only the International Monetary Fund’s 400-tonne sale, hardly enough by itself to meet the next half-decade’s 2,000-tonne limit.

Back at the Federal Reserve, meantime, tomorrow’s central-bank legacy – of freshly printed Treasury bonds bought with magic money from nowhere – continues to swell. Yes, the Fed’s stockpile of T-bonds may be smaller today than it was back in August ‘07 before the Great Inevitable broke, thanks to record Wall Street demand for the safety of Washington’s debt. And yes, the Fed isn’t quite collecting new bonds from the Treasury door directly, waiting instead a few days or so before picking them up (as Brian Benton, Chris Martenson and others have found) from those primary dealers who do bid at auction, rather than out-and-out monetizing the debt for all to see with its newly created cash.

And sure, private-sector demand for Treasuries continues to look so strong right now – what with overnight rates at 0%, plus the ongoing collapse of house prices, world trade and jobs creation – that the Fed says it will stop financing Uncle Sam’s spending in, umm, October rather than in September as previously stated.

But hoarding gold looked rather more sensible amidst the violence and misery of the mid-20th century, and no one at the Fed or Treasury guessed two years ago that they’d be offering leverage incentives to try and revive the market in mortgage-backed derivatives. When the global economy gets off the floor…or risk assets become more attractive to private investment…or China and Japan find they really don’t have any space left for US debt in their central-bank vaults, the market into which the Fed will want to sell its Treasury hoard will look very different to the market from which it’s currently buying.

Whether a decade from now, in 2010, or perhaps this fall – when the $300 billion of quantitative easing ear-marked for Treasuries is spent – trying to quit the Fed’s newest “legacy asset” could prove tougher even than finding ready buyers for today’s toxic junk. And given the soaring interest rates and potential US bankruptcy that in turn might trigger, spurred by whatever’s added to the Treasury’s $11.7 trillion of debt between now and then, perhaps buying gold will look a smart move to the Western world’s central bankers once more.

Regards,
Adrian Ash

Source: Gold Will No Longer Be a Toxic Derivative to Central Banks

That will all change beginning today with the Nonfarm Productivity report for the 2nd QTR… Long time readers know my dislike for this data, as I believe it simply shows that one person works longer hours! The Fed Heads used to be all over this data like a cheap suit, and probably still trip over themselves to see the data when it prints… But to me, it’s not what Big Al Greenspan made it out to be…

Tomorrow is the big data day this week with both the Trade & Monthly Budget Balances printing for July… The Trade Deficit should tick up some, as Oil prices have gained in recent weeks, and the Monthly Budget Deficit? Oh my! It is forecast to be $180 Billion in the red! Which annualized would be more than $2.1 Trillion! But don’t worry about it folks, no biggie according to the folks in Washington D.C. The Treasury will just issue more bonds, and the Fed will buy up any that don’t get bought, and pay for them with money they printed up fresh that day!

You know that I’m be facetious with the “don’t worry” talk… I’ve been talking about this deficit spending for quite a few years now… I like the fact that others have joined in now that the numbers have gotten so large they are as obvious as a man with a hatchet in his forehead, but at least they’ve joined the “stop the deficit spending movement”…

Speaking of The Treasury issuing Bonds… This week alone the Treasury will auction $37 Billion of 3-year Notes, $23 Billion of 10-year notes, and $15 Billion of 30-year bonds… Even using “new math” that brings this week’s issuance to $75 Billion! That sound? That sound you hear is foreigners choking on all this issuance! Does anyone know how to apply the Heimlich maneuver?

The “got yield” scenario I talked about yesterday, didn’t play out yesterday, as stocks came back… The A$ saw some selling along with kiwi, reals, and any other “high yielder”… The selling wasn’t bad, so we can probably put it down to profit taking.

I’m doing some research on the years around the depression, looking at market movements, and confidence levels… It’s amazing the things that were being said right up and to the stock market crash about how everything was fine… Then skip ahead to the 80’s and you had the same things going on with lofty praises for the S&L industry, especially one by Big Al Greenspan, and then the S&L industry circled the bowl… Makes you wonder, and I’m not talking about wondering who wrote the book of love… No, I’m talking about how this should make you wonder, or question, what’s being said about how great stocks are right now… When the President makes comments about “a good time to buy stocks”, you’ve got to stop and think folks… Just stop!

OK… I wanted to give everyone an update on the popularity of the BRIC MarketSafe CD we introduced last month… With over a week to go until we reach the funding deadline, this CD has received a ton of newsletter writer coverage, and interest… The funding has gone quite well, and we expect to open this CD with a very large amount of cash… That’s exciting for me, as I saw this as an opportunity to deal in “speculative” investments, without market risk, and jumped on getting this available to our customers…

I also wanted to follow up on the Jobs Jamboree data we talked about yesterday morning… I had a very nice reader tell me that I “hadn’t fallen off turnip truck” as the participation rate fell! That’s right! As she said to me… “So, all those poor men and women that were hit at the beginning of the recession have the great pleasure of no longer being counted as either employed or unemployed.”

I also wanted to follow up on last week’s talk on the Weekly Initial Jobless Claims that fell for the previous week… I had a reader who recently became unemployed in California tell me the problems with trying to file as unemployed! Let’s listen in to him explain his attempt to file as unemployed…

“Filled out the unemployment application on-line the day I was laid off.
About four days latter they send you another form to fill out and return. If not returned immediately, you lose your benefits.

Received a letter indicating they would call me 7 weeks after applying, to determine eligibility. It is scheduled for September 27th at 1 PM to
3 PM.

About two weeks afterwards, found there is no way to reach a human. The only way to reach them is EMAIL, which takes a couple of days to respond. EMAIL has a canned response, we will contact you on Sept 27th.”

OK… Enough of that! China came out with some data today… While exports continue to suffer the stimulus that the Gov’t put into the economy, which made sense due to the fact that the Gov’t had a war chest of cash to put into the economy, which is the exact opposite of the situation in most countries including the U.S. Chinese Industrial Production growth was strong, marking three consecutive months of improvement in Industrial Production. The ongoing recovery of domestic demand is good, while consumer demand keeps holding up well with July retail sales growth up 15.2% year-on-year…

Now, I fully understand how there can be questions about the validity of Chinese data… But come on! We don’t live there, we have no idea! And they don’t have a John Williams (Shadow Stats) to show everyone that the Gov’t’s official data prints are misleading and most times inaccurate!

I saw this report on the Bloomie this morning from Zillow… “Almost one-quarter of U.S. mortgage holders owed more than their homes were worth in the second quarter and that figure may rise to as much as 30 percent by mid-2010 as job losses and foreclosures climb.”

That’s depressing stuff… Very depressing… So! Before I go to the Big Finish, I’ve got to find a “feel good” story… Of course if I were the Gov’t I would have a pocket full of those, to pull out whenever the consumers needed one! HA! But, I’m not the Gov’t! thank goodness! Whenever I think of the Gov’t, I think of those words that Ronald Reagan spoke regarding the scariest words a person can hear… “I’m from the Gov’t and I’m here to help”

OK… The euro looks to be catching some wind in its sails this morning, as it has gained 1/4 euro since I came in… I know that’s chicken feed, but Hey! You’ve got to start somewhere, and after Friday’s bloodletting, the tourniquet was applied on Monday, and today maybe we’ll see it gain back lost ground… For… It is “Turn-around Tuesday!” (well hopefully it will be!)

And if the risk assets (like stocks) are rebounding, Gold and Silver should be on the docket to rally too… And a quick look at the Bloomie tells me they are indeed, rebounding… So, now, let’s go to the Big Finish!

Currencies today 8/11/09: A$ .8365, kiwi .6715, C$ .9125, euro 1.4170, sterling 1.6475, Swiss .9250, rand 8.13, krone 6.2125, SEK 7.28, forint 191.80, zloty 2.9370, koruna 18.19, yen 96.50, sing 1.4460, HKD 7.7505, INR 48.02, China 6.8350, pesos 12.96, BRL 1.84, dollar index 79.12, Oil $70.73, 10-yr 3.78%, Silver $14.43, and Gold… $947.60

That’s it for today… I barely mentioned it yesterday, and have been remiss in not mentioning it before, but next week I head to San Francisco Money Show. San Francisco has always been one of my fave cities to visit, and last year I had a blast there, except for that red-eye I had to take home so I could be on the desk Monday morning! I played in San Francisco when I was a young man playing my guitar… Right there in the Cannery… Last year, we went across the peninsula to an awesome restaurant named the Cliff House… I hope to make it back there this year! But, the real reason I go there is to talk to audiences about diversifying, and what I see going on, and or happening in the future… It’s just my thoughts, but I seem to fill the rooms, so that’s a good thing! Nice win by my beloved Cardinals last night. I was in bed by the 6th inning when they scored all their runs! UGH! Time to go… Try to make your Tuesday Terrific!

Source: $75 Billion in New Treasuries this Week