<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; TXT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/txt/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Long-Term Stock-Market Uptrend to Continue</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/long-term-stock-market-uptrend-to-continue/20750</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/long-term-stock-market-uptrend-to-continue/20750#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Blandeburgo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[index etf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon D. Markman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TXT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XLI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XLV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Stocks moved lower for the third consecutive day on Friday, something that hasn’t happened in more than three weeks, as the bulls just couldn’t capitalize on a short-term overbought condition. Measures of selling pressure eased as the bears rested their knuckles after a two-day pummeling.</p>
<p>Investors are worried. The big question – as always – is whether the primary uptrend remains intact.</p>
<p>And the answer is yes.</p>
<p>To understand just what that target should be, let’s take a look at where we are right now.</p>
<p>Just before Wednesday’s sell-off, measures of the supply of stocks moved to new lows, while demand moved to new highs. This means bull-market-trading rules remain in effect. But as the cyclical bull market matures a little, we need to&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stocks moved lower for the third consecutive day on Friday, something that hasn’t happened in more than three weeks, as the bulls just couldn’t capitalize on a short-term overbought condition. Measures of selling pressure eased as the bears rested their knuckles after a two-day pummeling.<span id="more-20750"></span></p>
<p>Investors are worried. The big question – as always – is whether the primary uptrend remains intact.</p>
<p>And the answer is yes.</p>
<p>To understand just what that target should be, let’s take a look at where we are right now.</p>
<p>Just before Wednesday’s sell-off, measures of the supply of stocks moved to new lows, while demand moved to new highs. This means bull-market-trading rules remain in effect. But as the cyclical bull market matures a little, we need to change the target of our buying efforts.</p>
<p>Although it looked like losses would be cut in the early afternoon, a lack of demand resulted in the major U.S. indices settling gently at support near the high end of the August trading range. The <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> lost 0.4%, the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500 Index</a> </strong>lost 0.6%, the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq Composite Index</a> </strong>lost 0.8%, and the <strong>Russell 2000</strong> lost 0.5%.</p>
<p>All the major sector groups save healthcare finished in the red. The declines were the most severe among industrial conglomerates. The <strong>Industrials Select SPDR </strong>(<strong>NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=xli" target="_blank">XLI</a>) </strong>lost 1.4% thanks to a 2.5% fall in <strong>Textron Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=txt" target="_blank">TXT</a>).</strong> Bank stocks were also weak as <strong>Bank of America</strong> <strong>Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=BAC" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong> dropped 2.2%. Defensive healthcare and utilities stocks were relatively buoyant with a gain of 0.1% for the <strong>Healthcare SPDR</strong> <strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=XLV" target="_blank">XLV</a>)</strong> and just a 0.3% loss for the <strong>Utilities SPDR (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=XLU" target="_blank">XLU</a>)</strong>.</p>
<p>Homebuilders were under some heavy selling pressure over the past week, likely the consequence of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s decision to slow its purchases of mortgages. By spending $1.45 trillion, the Fed kept the difference between mortgage rates and the yield on U.S. Treasury debt very low.</p>
<p>Now, as these purchases taper off, mortgage rates will creep higher and erode some of the awesome affordability levels that are driving buyers to take advantage of the government’s first-time homebuyer tax credit and stabilize the housing market. As a result, the <strong>iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF</strong> <strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=itb" target="_blank">ITB</a>) </strong>lost 2.7% on Friday and dropped 8.3% last week.</p>
<p>The declines of the past week have been in alignment with our expectation of a short-term correction before equities push on to what should be a more meaningful top near the 1,200 level on the S&amp;P 500. A number of technical indicators, including the percentage of stocks over their 10-day moving average as well as breadth and volume measures, had begun to deteriorate after having moved well into overbought territory the prior two weeks.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/indu26.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
We aim to run our portfolios for long-term holds during bull markets, so although we warned of weakness ahead we did not expect it to be serious enough to merit exiting positions. Still don’t.</p>
<p>The big question – always – is whether the primary uptrend remains intact. And the answer is yes. Just before Wednesday’s sell-off, measures of the supply of stocks moved to new lows, while demand moved to new highs. This means bull-market-trading rules remain in effect. But as the cyclical bull market matures a little, we need to change the target of our buying efforts.</p>
<p>However dramatic the action of the past few days has been, it is a sign that some normalcy is returning to the equity markets. Moving forward, it is unlikely we will see long strings of uninterrupted up days, super-strong performance in the lowest quality stocks, and high correlations between stocks. In the final push to the stimulus- and recovery-Fed reaction high that we will likely see over the next three months or so, the emphasis may shift to fundamental analysis and quality.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<strong><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/corr26.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="520" height="287" /></strong><br />
As you can see in the chart above, stock-performance correlations tend to spike during times of economic stress. When investors enter panic mode and analyst estimates become much less accurate, the focus shifts from individual assets to asset classes and broad sectors of the economy. In other words, when all hell breaks loose investors don’t differentiate between great companies and good companies – they throw them all out.</p>
<p>Once this unease subsides and economic volatility wanes, fundamental analysis once again becomes the most important driver of investment performance.  And that’s okay, because there will be plenty of opportunities as investors shift their focus from stocks that were priced for Armageddon to stocks that are poised to benefit from renewed economic expansion.</p>
<p>The foundations for the transition are already being laid: <strong>UBS AG (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ubs" target="_blank">UBS</a>)</strong> analyst Jeffrey Palma notes that after nearly a year of downward revisions to earnings, analysts are starting to upgrade their forecasts for 2010. Estimate rebounds are largest in the cyclical materials and retail sectors. Breaking it down by region, the most promising opportunities are in commodity-related stocks in the United States, consumer stocks in Europe, and British banks.</p>
<p>We have recommended <strong>SPDR</strong> <strong>Metals &amp; Mining (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=XME" target="_blank">XME</a>)</strong> in our <strong><em>Strategic Advantage</em></strong> service as a great vehicle to play this trend, even though it stumbled last week. Another good one is <strong>iShares Australia</strong> <strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=EWA" target="_blank">EWA</a>)</strong>. Check out our newsletter for a much-expanded list of recommendations.</p>
<h3>The Week in Review</h3>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Monday</span></strong><strong>: </strong>The index of leading indicators jumped 0.6% in August after a 0.9% jump in July and a 0.8% jump in June. The indicators’ August performance represented the fifth consecutive monthly increase. Moreover, the 4.7% increase during these five months was the strongest showing since early 1983, which marked the beginning of one of history’s greatest bull markets.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Tuesday</span></strong><strong>:</strong> Home prices backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac jumped 0.3% in July. There were also indications that retail sales plummeted in the week following the Labor Day Back-to-School blitz.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Wednesday</span></strong><strong>:</strong> The <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/09/23/fed-economy/" target="_blank">Federal Reserve announced it would leave interest rates unchanged</a>. Stocks initially bounded higher before abruptly shifting direction and screaming lower. The bulls gunned the Dow Industrial Average close to the 10,000 level before things fell apart. At issue wasn’t the Fed’s target policy rate, which affects short-term interest rates. Instead, traders were apparently concerned that Fed chairman Ben Bernanke and his cohorts failed to expand its direct purchases of mortgages and government debt. This will likely result in higher long-term rates.</p>
<p>Credit markets, though, didn’t care, and carried on with their bull market run. Crude oil fell 4.8% to $68.33, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/09/22/oil-prices-11/" target="_blank">its largest percentage loss since July on a surprise increase in inventories</a>.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Thursday</span></strong><strong>: </strong>Some momentum was lost in the housing market after weak existing homes sales numbers put an end for four straight months of gains. Sales last month came in at a million seasonality adjusted annual rate of 5.1 million — a 2.7% drop from July. We continue to see an emphasis on foreclosures with distressed sales making up 31% of total sales. The highlight: Supply of homes fell to just 8.5 months of sales, a level that is believed to reflect a balanced market. There are, however, the issues surrounding a &#8220;shadow&#8221; inventory of homes waiting for foreclosure proceedings to complete or the slightest whiff of a recovery before being listed.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Friday</span></strong><strong>: </strong>The G20 wrapped up its meeting in Pittsburgh with a commitment to tighter regulation of the financial system and system to subject each country’s economic policy to a type of peer review to try to avoid the types of global imbalances — China’s export obsession and America’s credit binge — don’t happen in the future. While the latter can only be enforced by a public shaming by other countries and the International Monetary Fund, it lacks an actual penalty. But it’s a good first step.</p>
<p>Consumer sentiment, as measured by the University of Michigan, improved to its highest level since early 2008 after rising by nearly one-third since late last year. According to Haver Analytics, over the last 10 years there has been a 69% correlation between sentiment and growth in consumer spending.<br />
Unfortunately, the good news didn’t extend to durable goods orders in August: There was an unexpected decline that reversed half of July’s 4.8% gain. A drop in orders for transportation equipment was fingered as the main culprit. However, this metric is quite volatility and the overall trend still points towards a rebound in the manufacturing sector. <strong></strong></p>
<h3>The Week Ahead</h3>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Monday</span></strong><strong>:</strong> A quiet calendar with no economic releases.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Tuesday</span></strong><strong>: </strong>The latest on nationwide home prices courtesy of the excellent Case-Shiller Home Price Index. Also, we get another update on consumer confidence.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Wednesday</span></strong><strong>: </strong>The government makes its final revisions to second-quarter GDP. The last revision made no change to the initial estimate of a 1% decline. In the first quarter, GDP plummeted 6.4%. Traders will be looking for indications that inventories have dropped and demand is increasing ahead of a projected inventory rebuild in the months ahead. We will also get an update on the health of the manufacturing base in the latest ISM – Chicago Business Barometer.</p>
<p>Wednesday will also mark the end of the third quarter.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Thursday</span></strong><strong>: </strong>A busy day with an update on auto sales, personal income and spending, the latest ISM Manufacturing Index, and construction spending.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Friday</span></strong><strong>: </strong>The September jobs report is expected to show a loss of 170,000 jobs compared to the 216,000 that were lost in August and a 463,000 decline in June. The unemployment rate, currently at 9.7%, will move closer to 10%. Also, we get an update on factory orders.<br />
In summary, the start of the fourth quarter is on the horizon. We expect it to be a plus for investors, though not without growth and geopolitical scares that create S-turns and potholes. Stay positive amid the turbulence as long as corporate credit markets remain strong and the primary trend is up.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/09/28/long-term-stock-market-uptrend/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/09/28/long-term-stock-market-uptrend/">Source: Long-Term Stock-Market Uptrend to Continue</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/long-term-stock-market-uptrend-to-continue/20750/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Empty Houses in America</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/more-empty-houses-in-america/19662</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/more-empty-houses-in-america/19662#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TXT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US housing crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US jobless crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIA.B]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it time to buy a house? Depends&#8230; </p>
<p>If you need a place to live and want to own a house, why not? Prices in some areas are fairly reasonable. But if you’re speculating, our guess is that you’ll get a better deal if you wait.</p>
<p>Why? For the many reasons we have given you in these Daily Reckonings. House prices may be firming in some areas – that’s what the Case-Shiller numbers seem to show. But nationwide, they are probably headed down for quite a while longer.</p>
<p>Herewith, four reasons why:</p>
<p>First, as you know, this is a depression. It will probably be long. And deep. You wouldn’t know it from looking at the stock market or reading the news. The Dow&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it time to buy a house? Depends&#8230; <span id="more-19662"></span></p>
<p>If you need a place to live and want to own a house, why not? Prices in some areas are fairly reasonable. But if you’re speculating, our guess is that you’ll get a better deal if you wait.</p>
<p>Why? For the many reasons we have given you in these Daily Reckonings. House prices may be firming in some areas – that’s what the Case-Shiller numbers seem to show. But nationwide, they are probably headed down for quite a while longer.</p>
<p>Herewith, four reasons why:</p>
<p>First, as you know, this is a depression. It will probably be long. And deep. You wouldn’t know it from looking at the stock market or reading the news. The Dow went up another 114 points yesterday. Oil rose to $71. And the dollar – anticipating inflation – fell to $1.44 per euro.</p>
<p>But that’s what bounces are supposed to look like. They look good enough so that people mistake them for the real thing&#8230; and get suckered into more losses.</p>
<p>Depressions drag down asset prices. Typically, prices become much more reasonable. And then they reach UNREASONABLE levels. House prices have become reasonable. Now they will become unreasonably cheap&#8230;</p>
<p>Second, waves of resets and foreclosures are still washing over the housing market. As Barry Ritholz told us in Vancouver, we’re only half way through the foreclosure process. There are more than 18 million empty houses in America. A news report yesterday told of a 32-storey apartment building in Florida with only one lonely tenant.</p>
<p>And still coming up are more refinancings&#8230; more drowning homeowners &#8230; and more people giving up on homeownership altogether. The bubble era created new households at the rate of 1.2 million per year. Practically every one of them wanted to get in on the housing boom. Now, there are only 500,000 new households per year. And few of them still believe that housing is the route to wealth. At the current rate, it will take many years to fill up all America’s empty houses.</p>
<p>Third, incomes are falling. Property crashed because people with average incomes could no longer afford to buy the average house. Now, they can afford even less. Ken Rogoff estimates that the consumer needs 6-8 years to pay his debts down to a more reasonable level. Part of that deleveraging process will mean getting rid of heavy mortgage debt – one way or another.</p>
<p>Fourth, there are too many houses that are too big&#8230; and in the wrong places.. Big houses were a status symbol in the bubble years. Now they’re a symbol of extravagance and error. Plus, they’re expensive to own. People will want to dump them – even if they can afford them. There was far too much building in the outlying suburbs of the sand states too – Arizona, Nevada, California and Florida. Those houses may have to be abandoned as people are forced to move closer to where the work is.</p>
<p>There are also a couple of more technical reasons why the Case-Shiller numbers may be erring on the bright side: seasonal adjustments and a changing mix of houses sold. But our guess is that real house prices – adjusted for inflation – will continue going down for many more years.</p>
<p>You want to see deflation? Go to Tokyo City in London. The restaurant chain says it is going to give its food away for free. Customers will pay for drinks plus 2 pounds 50 pence for service.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, in Tokyo itself prices are falling – again. The Japanese have had on-again, off-again deflation for the last 20 years&#8230; ever since their stock market crashed in 1989.</p>
<p>Hey, what’s the matter with those Japanese? Don’t they know about stimulus?</p>
<p>Hold on there, pilgrim. What the Japanese don’t know about stimulus ain’t worth knowing. They’ve stimulated their economy so much that their government debt now measures 200% of GDP. And what did they get for all that stimulus? Did it get their economy moving?</p>
<p>Are you kidding? Now, the latest news tells us that they also have the highest jobless rate in 6 years. And the latest figures show the inflation rate NEGATIVE. In fact, never has the inflation rate been lower.</p>
<p>*** Nissan announced an electric car. Shares soared.</p>
<p>*** Jobless benefits are running out for 1.5 million unemployed Americans, says a New York Times report.</p>
<p>*** And here a commentary by David Pauly on what Wall Street is doing about low earnings – lying!</p>
<p>“Stock analysts continue to promote corporate earnings lies, insisting that net income isn’t really what investors need to know&#8230; .</p>
<p>“In analyst speak, <a style="font-weight: bold; color: #006b99;" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=INTC%3AUS">Intel</a> Corp. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Intel+Corp">INTC</a>) wasn’t hit with a $1.45 billion fine from the European Union in the second quarter for anticompetitive practices.</p>
<p>“After setting aside funds to cover the fine, which Intel is appealing, the semiconductor-maker had a quarterly loss of $398 million, or 7 cents a share. Disregarding the fine altogether, <a style="font-weight: bold; color: #006b99;" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=INTC%3AUS">analysts</a> maintain the company earned 18 cents a share, beating their average estimate of 8 cents.</p>
<p>“As Wall Street tells it, the employee stock options Google Inc. granted in the second quarter didn’t cost its shareholders $293 million.<br />
“<a style="font-weight: bold; color: #006b99;" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=GOOG%3AUS">Google</a><span style="font-weight: bold; color: #006b99;"> </span>(NASDAQ:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=GOOG">GOOG</a>), according to generally accepted accounting principles, earned $1.48 billion, or $4.66 a share, in the period. Not enough for Wall Street, which prefers to say the company earned $5.36 a share, leaving out the cost of stock options.</p>
<p>“<a style="font-weight: bold; color: #006b99;" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=VIA%2FB%3AUS">Viacom</a> Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Viacom+Inc.">VIA.B</a>), an entertainment company, this week reported second-quarter net income of $277 million, or 46 cents a share. Analysts had estimated profit as if money Viacom paid out in severance in the period wasn’t the real thing. On that basis, Viacom earned 49 cents a share, beating the average estimate by 1 cent.</p>
<p>“<a style="font-weight: bold; color: #006b99;" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=TWX%3AUS">Time Warner</a> Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:TWX">TWX</a>), a rival of Viacom for entertainment dollars, said it earned $519 million, or 43 cents a share, in the quarter. Analysts insist Time Warner earned 45 cents, excluding, according to Bloomberg data, costs related to litigation and asset sales. Lawyers must work for nothing.</p>
<p>“By similar Wall Street reckoning, the expense of cutting jobs and selling an asset that reduced <a style="font-weight: bold; color: #006b99;" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=MHP%3AUS">McGraw-Hill Cos</a>. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=McGraw-Hill+Cos.">MHP</a>) second quarter earnings per share by 10 percent was immaterial.</p>
<p>“Analysts also say investors should ignore $129 million that <a style="font-weight: bold; color: #006b99;" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=TXT%3AUS">Textron</a> Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Textron+Inc.">TXT</a>), maker of small airplanes, helicopters and golf carts, charged against net income in the latest quarter. Included was the cost of shutting a plant for an eight-seat jet Textron decided not to build.</p>
<p>“<a style="font-weight: bold; color: #006b99;" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=GE%3AUS">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=GE">GE</a>), which makes jet engines and electric power equipment and has a financial services arm, had a second- quarter profit of 24 cents a share. GE and the analysts emphasized earnings from continuing operations, which at 26 cents a share, exceeded their estimate by 2 cents. A $194 million loss from discarded businesses was discarded.”</p>
<p>And so on&#8230; and so on&#8230;</p>
<p>*** “As You Like It” was as we liked it – lively, bawdy, and raucous. It is not Shakespeare’s finest play – or so the critics say. But it has some marvelous dialogue. “All the world is a stage&#8230; ” is the most memorable.</p>
<p>Our hostess had set up a stage on the lawn and put out a hundred or so chairs for guests. But by the time we sat down it had begun to rain. The chairs were wet. A Frenchman gallantly wiped off Elizabeth’s chair. Your editor sat down in a puddle&#8230; and the play began&#8230;</p>
<p>The rain continued throughout the performance. Some spectators – perhaps those who listened to the weather forecast – came equipped with parkas and anoraks. We had an umbrella, which we held over our heads throughout the performance.</p>
<p>Despite the drippy conditions in the bleachers, a good time was had by all. The English actors who performed the play were real pros. They enlivened the set with music and acrobatics, moving the story forward 4 centuries to the days of Peace &amp; Love and strawberry fields forever. We never quite got the connection&#8230; but it seemed to work, somehow.</p>
<p>After the play was over, we retired to a stone barn for soup and dessert. There, we met neighbors whom we only see once a year – in August. Among them was a dear <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Daily Reckoning</a> reader.</p>
<p>“I’m glad I bought gold when I did,” he said. “It was $600 or so at the time. So I made a gain on the gold. But the important thing was that I wasn’t caught in that sell-off in stocks last year.</p>
<p>“What do you think gold is going to do now?”</p>
<p>“Probably, it will go down,” we replied.</p>
<p>“So, you’re selling your gold?”</p>
<p>“No&#8230; we’re holding on&#8230; It’s too risky to sell it.”</p>
<p>*** “Of course, that’s the big question,” Elizabeth began on the drive home.</p>
<p>“What’s the big question?”</p>
<p>“About whether the world is just a stage. It’s really a question of free will. About whether we do things because we think them through ourselves, or whether we just play our roles.</p>
<p>“I suppose it’s related to the ‘Great Man’ theory of history&#8230; the idea that people actually determine history, rather than play their parts in it&#8230; ”</p>
<p>“It’s probably like all the great questions&#8230; that is, both true and untrue at the same time. I mean, Louis 14th couldn’t have been Louis 14th if there hadn’t been a Louis 13th&#8230; and if France hadn’t been the leading country of Europe&#8230; and if it hadn’t been the peak of the monarchic age.</p>
<p>“And Rommel couldn’t have led a Blitzkrieg in WWII if the tank hadn’t been invented in WWI&#8230; .</p>
<p>“In both cases, it appears that Shakespeare was right&#8230; that the roles were already there, just waiting for someone to play them&#8230; ”</p>
<p>“Yes, but I wonder if that is true&#8230; or as completely true as it looks. The fellow who took over from Lenin didn’t have to be a monster, did he?”</p>
<p>“I don’t know. If he hadn’t been so ruthless some other guy probably would have purged him out&#8230; sent him to the gulag. Once a revolution gets started, the most violent and ruthless groups seem to take over. So, I guess you could say that even there&#8230; the role must be played&#8230; ”</p>
<p>“Does that apply to our personal lives, too? Are we just playing roles? You are pretending to be my husband. I am pretending to be your wife. We are pretending to love each other. Is that all there is to it?”</p>
<p>“No&#8230; no&#8230; that’s very different&#8230; ”</p>
<p>“How so?”</p>
<p>“I don’t know&#8230; but when I say I love you, it comes out of my soul like smoke from a sacred volcano&#8230; ”</p>
<p>“What does that mean?”</p>
<p>“I don’t know&#8230; I just like the sound of it&#8230; ”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fleetstreetinvest.co.uk/daily-reckoning/bill-bonner-essays/us-house-prices-54571.html"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fleetstreetinvest.co.uk/daily-reckoning/bill-bonner-essays/us-house-prices-54571.html">Source: More Empty Houses in America </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/more-empty-houses-in-america/19662/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street’s New Bull Market: 7 Signs the Bear is Dead…</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-street%e2%80%99s-new-bull-market-7-signs-the-bear-is-dead%e2%80%a6/15468</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-street%e2%80%99s-new-bull-market-7-signs-the-bear-is-dead%e2%80%a6/15468#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Louis Basenese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ILMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Basenese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TXT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Housing Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, but based on the classic Wall Street definitions, we’re in a new bull market. As of last Friday, all three major market indices recovered more than 20% from their March 9 lows.</p>
<p>Of course, we’ve been here before. Or as Yogi Berra liked to say, “It’s like déjà vu all over again.”</p>
<p>Recall, back in November of 2008 the markets began an impressive run-up, hitting the 20% milestone, too. Then all hell broke loose.</p>
<p>As a result, not every market observer, myself included, is completely convinced by the recent move. But I will say this &#8211; seven notable differences exist between then and now, leading me to believe this very well could be the start of a new bull&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, but based on the classic Wall Street definitions, we’re in a new bull market. As of last Friday, all three major market indices recovered more than 20% from their March 9 lows.<span id="more-15468"></span></p>
<p>Of course, we’ve been here before. Or as Yogi Berra liked to say, “It’s like déjà vu all over again.”</p>
<p>Recall, back in November of 2008 the markets began an impressive run-up, hitting the 20% milestone, too. Then all hell broke loose.</p>
<p>As a result, not every market observer, myself included, is completely convinced by the recent move. But I will say this &#8211; seven notable differences exist between then and now, leading me to believe this very well could be the start of a new bull market.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>There’s hope for housing.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>On Tuesday <em>CNBC</em> did a feature story on home sales in foreclosure central &#8211; California. In one suburb outside Stockton, where one out of every 67 homeowners received a foreclosure notice last month, new home inventories miraculously plummeted from 130 to just 17. One builder went from four sales in five months to nine sales in one month. Tax incentives definitely played a rule. Nevertheless, the trend jives with the latest overall market data.</p>
<p>Recall, new homes sales jumped an unexpected 4.7% in February. It also lends credence to newsletter guru Dennis Gartman’s latest <a href="http://moneynews.newsmax.com/streettalk/gartman_housing_shortage/2009/04/06/200293.html?utm_medium=RSS" target="_blank">prognostication</a> that “we’re going to have a shortage of housing in the not too distant future.”</p>
<p>Another positive &#8211; lumber prices, a leading indicator for the housing market, rebounded roughly 30% in the last three weeks. (The housing market accounts for two thirds of lumber consumption.) Add it all up, and this data is hardly overwhelming. But it’s certainly less bad (see # 3 below to understand why).</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Takeover rumors are moving stocks again. </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>In a clear sign of optimism and normalcy, <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/research/index/profit-from-takeover-targets.html" target="_blank">takeover rumors</a> are once again returning to the market. And, more importantly, they’re moving stocks and spurning heavy call options buying. For proof, look at the recent moves in <strong>Black &amp; Decker</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=BDK" target="_blank">BDK</a>), <strong>Textron</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATXT" target="_blank">TXT</a>), <strong>Allergan</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=AGN" target="_blank">AGN</a>) and <strong>Illumina</strong> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ILMN" target="_blank">ILMN</a>), to name a few.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>From bad to less bad.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Home sales. Durable goods orders. The ISM Manufacturing Index. These are just a handful of the economic data points that have gone from bad to less bad in recent weeks. At the same time, financial companies are beginning to wean themselves off of their government handout dependency.</p>
<p>Five banks announced they returned money given to them under the TARP program. And the TED Spread &#8211; a key indicator of perceived credit risk in the economy &#8211; is back below 100 basis points (bps) after peaking last October at 464 bps. (Keep in mind, the historical average TED spread is 30 basis points, so there’s still a ways to go.)</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>No halitosis. </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>The November rally that faltered was led by defensive stocks and lacked breadth. In other words, a large portion of the market did not come along for the ride. However, this go-round we’re witnessing widespread strength, particularly in financials, commodity related companies and semiconductors, suggesting the move is sustainable.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Volatility is dropping.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Right about the time we accepted one-hour 400 point swings as normal, their prevalence dropped off considerably. Look no further than the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX). After peaking at 89.53 last October, it’s back down to more reasonable level around 40. More simply put, the expected market vulatility has been cut in half.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The market’s always out front. </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Countless studies prove <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/January/stock-market-buy-signal.html" target="_blank">the market is the best leading indicator</a>, rallying three to seven months before the economy bottoms. That doesn’t mean we’re immune to head fakes. The classic example comes from the last “severe” recession from 1973 to 1975, when stocks rallied in early 1974, only to stumble again.</p>
<p>But talk about history repeating itself. We experienced the same false rally late last year.</p>
<p>Just like in 1975, when the Dow rallied 36.2% in the three months before the recession finally ended, the recent market move could be the real deal, too.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Bears out proselytizing bullishness.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>In a clear sign of a market bottom, the most bearish investors in recent times found, well, bullishness. This includes <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aqR2H8gIZ0.M" target="_blank">Jeremy Grantham</a>, who hated stocks for the past decade; Bill Fleckenstein, who shut down his 13-year-uld bearish fund to go long stocks; Steve Leuthuld, whose Grizzly Short Fund rose 74% in 2008; and Whitney Tilson, another one of the most bearish fund managers in recent years.</p>
<p>Don’t be quick to discard their change of heart and bullish comments as mere bloviations. These guys are the real deal, having predicted the downturn well in advance… and profited from it handsomely.</p>
<p>If this bull market is legit, I’ve already tuld you which small cap companies will perform best <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/January/small-cap-investing.html" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/February/small-cap-gains.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Turns out they’re already leading the charge, outpacing large caps by a full six percentage points since the March 9 lows, based on the Russell indices.</p>
<p>If you haven’t positioned your portfulio accordingly, take heed. This could be your last chance.</p>
<p>Source: <a class="post_title" href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/April/wall-streets-new-bull-market.html">Wall Street’s New Bull Market: 7 Signs the Bear is Dead…</a></p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--></input>
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-street%e2%80%99s-new-bull-market-7-signs-the-bear-is-dead%e2%80%a6/15468/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.267 seconds -->

