<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; U S Treasury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/u-s-treasury/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:11:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Wall Street Dips as Mixed Data Offsets Strong Earnings</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-street-dips-as-mixed-data-offsets-strong-earnings/19143</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-street-dips-as-mixed-data-offsets-strong-earnings/19143#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bond Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ftse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel Demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Aversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Risk aversion returned to markets on Thursday, supporting the U.S. dollar and government bonds, after mixed economic data, while concern about the possible failure of a small U.S. lender sparked caution following the week&#8217;s robust gains in stocks.</p>
<p>Oil hovered around $61 a barrel as worry about the strength of global fuel demand was offset by news of strong economic growth in China.</p>
<p>The U.S. dollar initially fell to a six-week low against major currencies after JPMorgan&#8217;s reported record investment banking and trading results, providing further evidence of recovery in the financial system, but weak U.S. manufacturing data and concern about the impact of the possible failure of U.S. lender CIT re-introduced a bid for safer-assets.</p>
<p>CIT&#8217;s talks about aid with the U.S. Treasury&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Risk aversion returned to markets on Thursday, supporting the U.S. dollar and government bonds, after mixed economic data, while concern about the possible failure of a small U.S. lender sparked caution following the week&#8217;s robust gains in stocks.</p>
<p>Oil hovered around $61 a barrel as worry about the strength of global fuel demand was offset by news of strong economic growth in China.</p>
<p>The U.S. dollar initially fell to a six-week low against major currencies after JPMorgan&#8217;s reported record investment banking and trading results, providing further evidence of recovery in the financial system, but weak U.S. manufacturing data and concern about the impact of the possible failure of U.S. lender CIT re-introduced a bid for safer-assets.</p>
<p>CIT&#8217;s talks about aid with the U.S. Treasury ended Wednesday night, leaving the lender to its own devices, and endangering the future of some of the one million customers of the lender to small businesses. U.S. Treasury debt prices rallied after three days of falls partly on a resulting flight-to-safety bid</p>
<p>A fall in a reading of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia&#8217;s index of business conditions in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic region to minus 7.5 in July from minus 2.2 the month before also helped push up bond prices.</p>
<p>The benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note was up 20/32 in price to yield 3.53 percent. The 2-year U.S. Treasury note was up 4/32 in price to yield 0.96 percent.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are in a difficult position at the moment because we are caught on the cusp between is this a sense of sustainable recovery or a possibility of a relapse?&#8221; said Richard McGuire, fixed income strategist at RBC Capital Markets in London.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s no real convincing evidence yet on either side,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>European shares hit a one-month closing high on improved sentiment following JPMorgan&#8217;s results and data that showed the number of U.S. workers claiming new jobless benefits fell last week.</p>
<p>But U.S. stocks faltered after a run-up this week that pushed the benchmark Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500 Index up 6.1 percent, the best three-day rally following a surge after U.S. equities hit a decade low in March.</p>
<p>Shortly after 1 p.m. (1700 GMT), the Dow Jones industrial average was up 3.18 points, or 0.04 percent, at 8,619.39. The Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500 Index was down 1.30 points, or 0.14 percent, at 931.38. The Nasdaq Composite Index was up 3.41 points, or 0.18 percent, at 1,866.31.</p>
<p>The FTSEurofirst 300 index of top European shares ended 0.4 percent higher at 866.81 points, fourth straight advancing session.</p>
<p>The number of U.S. workers filing new claims for jobless benefits fell last week to their lowest since January, but the seasonally adjusted government data was again distorted by earlier layoffs in the automotive industry.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a lot of conflicting data here, and I think that the market is reflecting that,&#8221; said Kim Caughey, senior equity research analyst at Fort Pitt Capital Group in Pittsburgh.</p>
<p>Asian shares across the region outside of Japan rose 1.3 percent to their highest since mid-June, while Japan&#8217;s benchmark Nikkei underperformed with a rise of 0.8 percent.</p>
<p>China reported economic growth quickened to 7.9 pct in the second quarter, beating forecasts.</p>
<p>The U.S. dollar was down against a basket of major currencies, with the U.S. Dollar Index off 0.02 percent at 79.299.</p>
<p>The euro was up 0.14 percent at $1.4124, while against the yen, the dollar was down 0.74 percent at 93.56.</p>
<p>Crude oil prices fell as investors tried to decide how high oil prices can rise given a still fragile global economy, said Mike Fitzpatrick, vice president at MF Global in New York.</p>
<p>U.S. light sweet crude oil fell 49 cents to $61.05 a barrel.</p>
<p>&#8220;$60 is the fulcrum balancing the price lever that tips whenever one contention or another is bolstered by news or economic data,&#8221; Fitzpatrick said.</p>
<p>Gold slipped as the dollar pared losses against the euro, with lacklustre demand for physical stocks of the metal also pressuring prices. Spot gold prices fell $1.20 to $937.25 an ounce.</p>
<p>NEW YORK, July 16 (Reuters)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-street-dips-as-mixed-data-offsets-strong-earnings/19143/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GM Bankruptcy Judge Approves Obama Administration’s Exit Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/gm-bankruptcy-judge-approves-obama-administration%e2%80%99s-exit-plan/18801</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/gm-bankruptcy-judge-approves-obama-administration%e2%80%99s-exit-plan/18801#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automobile Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIATY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMGMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US auto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>A federal judge handed the Obama administration an important victory in its push to steer the automobile industry back to health Sunday, approving the sale of General Motors Corp.’s (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#38;source=web&#38;ct=res&#38;cd=1&#38;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:GMGMQ&#38;ei=JzxSSsadFeCntgey7-zFDw&#38;usg=AFQjCNEzeDwoMcIBdbDjmi70-3cFhpci8g&#38;sig2=aZpZKfUhMhEs4922U2pGbg" target="_blank">GMGMQ</a>) most profitable assets to a new government-run company.</p>
<p>The move removes an important barrier to the company’s plan to exit bankruptcy.</p>
<p>Judge Robert E. Gerber of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued a ruling saying the sale was GM’s only option and that it would &#8220;<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5650IW20090706?sp=true" target="_blank">prevent the death of the patient on the operating table</a>,” according to <strong><em>Reuters.</em></strong></p>
<p>The 87-page ruling rejected appeals from a group of bondholders, tort claimants and unions who had objected to the plan.</p>
<p>“As nobody can seriously dispute, the only alternative to an immediate&#8230;</p></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>A federal judge handed the Obama administration an important victory in its push to steer the automobile industry back to health Sunday, approving the sale of General Motors Corp.’s (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:GMGMQ&amp;ei=JzxSSsadFeCntgey7-zFDw&amp;usg=AFQjCNEzeDwoMcIBdbDjmi70-3cFhpci8g&amp;sig2=aZpZKfUhMhEs4922U2pGbg" target="_blank">GMGMQ</a>) most profitable assets to a new government-run company.</p>
<p>The move removes an important barrier to the company’s plan to exit bankruptcy.</p>
<p>Judge Robert E. Gerber of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued a ruling saying the sale was GM’s only option and that it would &#8220;<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5650IW20090706?sp=true" target="_blank">prevent the death of the patient on the operating table</a>,” according to <strong><em>Reuters.</em></strong></p>
<p>The 87-page ruling rejected appeals from a group of bondholders, tort claimants and unions who had objected to the plan.</p>
<p>“As nobody can seriously dispute, the only alternative to an immediate sale is liquidation — a disastrous result for GM’s creditors, its employees, the suppliers who depend on GM for their own existence, and the communities in which GM operates,” Gerber said in the opinion.</p>
<p>When the sale is completed, it would transfer GM’s “good assets” &#8211; including the Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC brands &#8211; to a new company majority-owned by the U.S. Treasury.  It would also pave the way for the new GM to exit bankruptcy in less than two months, one month earlier than the government’s projection.</p>
<p>The plan would allow the company to jettison unwanted property to the old GM, including 16 automotive plants in Delaware, Ohio, New York, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Michigan. The Treasury will also provide the estate with $1.175 billion to unwind the remaining assets, up from original projections of $950 million after creditors complained about possibly getting stuck with liquidation costs.</p>
<p>The U.S. government would own 60% of the new GM in return for $50 billion in loans, the Canadian government would get 11.7% for $9 billion in loans, and workers would receive a 17.5% stake for relinquishing future health-care benefits.</p>
<p>Bondholders would be forced to convert about $27 billion in bonds into about 10% of stock in the new company, plus warrants with a total value of $7.4 billion. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aSuZjrPVjLig" target="_blank">New GM’s total equity is anticipated to be worth more than $38 billion</a>, according to <strong><em>Bloomberg News.</em></strong></p>
<p>During three days of hearings, the workers and bondholders objected to the plan, saying the “new GM” is just “old GM” minus a slew of liabilities. They contend the company would market nothing new, pedaling the same cars and trucks, made by the same workers managed by the same executives.</p>
<p>Gerber dismissed the bondholders’ assertion that GM should restructure under a Chapter 11 reorganization plan, which would let creditors vote on details of the plan, saying the argument was unrealistic.</p>
<p>&#8220;In the event of liquidation, creditors now trying to increase their incremental recoveries would get nothing,&#8221; he ruled.</p>
<p>Gerber’s ruling also torpedoed arguments from dealers whose contracts are being terminated, groups of car-accident victims who said they would now be unable to sue GM for their injuries, and others who claimed that the U.S. government had been overbearing in its negotiations to restructure the automaker.<br />
Gerber issued a typical four-day stay of the order approving the sale, which allows for possible appeals.</p>
<p>Steve Jakubowki, a lawyer for product-liability claimants said he would appeal the ruling even though GM recently revised its bankruptcy plan to take on claims from future car-accident victims.</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124685350559099233.html" target="_blank">This issue is too important, too unsettled and too many people’s lives hang in the balance for me not to pursue this appeal through to the end</a>,&#8221; Jakubowski told <strong><em>The Wall Street Journal.</em></strong></p>
<p>Gerber ruled that the sale could be “free and clear of claims,” because his hands were tied by precedents established in the second judicial circuit during the bankruptcy filed by <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=3&amp;url=http://www.chryslerllc.com/&amp;ei=5j1SStnQEJeJtgey9Z2ACg&amp;usg=AFQjCNGlaw2nwLSPhWjfKzgJBK6dsg-P2g&amp;sig2=deFOcwxpfpCZhYmZDkYBYw" target="_blank">Chrysler LLC</a>.  The second judicial circuit encompasses Gerber’s court.</p>
<p>But in the end, Gerber concluded that the government’s plan was the only one that makes sense.</p>
<p>&#8220;GM cannot survive with its continuing losses … and without the governmental funding that will expire in a matter of days,&#8221; Gerber wrote.</p>
<p>The ruling marks the second big victory for the Obama administration’s auto task force, which will be charged with supervising the liquidation of the remaining assets.  The task force had previously engineered the sale of Chrysler to a consortium headed by Italy’s Fiat S.p.A. (ADR OTC:<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=3&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:FIATY&amp;ei=lD1SSqbdIIqxtweemvCzBA&amp;usg=AFQjCNF8fDYgDuUXMcYWOFszecFIXamXyg&amp;sig2=M8RshneZPzFComDZ6v6ERg" target="_blank">FIATY</a>).</p>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/06/general-motors-bankruptcy-3/">GM Bankruptcy Judge Approves Obama Administration’s Exit Plan </a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/gm-bankruptcy-judge-approves-obama-administration%e2%80%99s-exit-plan/18801/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.S. Treasury Moves The Goal Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-us-treasury-moves-the-goal-posts/18623</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-us-treasury-moves-the-goal-posts/18623#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Butler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Dollar & Forex Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[currencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[currency rally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Price Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiwi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us treasury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A 4-day rally gets stopped at the border&#8230;  Home Prices fall at a -18.12% pace&#8230;  Alice Rivlin gives her 2-cents&#8230;<br />
* Kiwi bond maturities galore next month&#8230; And Now&#8230; Today&#8217;s Pfennig!<br />
Good day&#8230; And a Wonderful Wednesday to you! As tradition with the Pfennig would have it, here&#8217;s my introduction to July&#8230; There I was&#8230; On a July morning&#8230; Looking for love&#8230; With the strength of a new day dawning, and&#8230; The beautiful sun&#8230;</p>
<p>Yes, for those &#8220;old rockers&#8221; from the 70&#8217;s like me&#8230; That&#8217;s Uriah Heep, at their best!</p>
<p>OK&#8230; So, welcome to July! The last day of June was quite the volatile one to say the least! There we were waiting for the S&#38;P/CaseShiller Home Price Index to print, and show that home prices were&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 4-day rally gets stopped at the border&#8230;  Home Prices fall at a -18.12% pace&#8230;  Alice Rivlin gives her 2-cents&#8230;<br />
* Kiwi bond maturities galore next month&#8230; And Now&#8230; Today&#8217;s Pfennig!<br />
Good day&#8230; And a Wonderful Wednesday to you! As tradition with the Pfennig would have it, here&#8217;s my introduction to July&#8230; There I was&#8230; On a July morning&#8230; Looking for love&#8230; With the strength of a new day dawning, and&#8230; The beautiful sun&#8230;</p>
<p>Yes, for those &#8220;old rockers&#8221; from the 70&#8217;s like me&#8230; That&#8217;s Uriah Heep, at their best!</p>
<p>OK&#8230; So, welcome to July! The last day of June was quite the volatile one to say the least! There we were waiting for the S&amp;P/CaseShiller Home Price Index to print, and show that home prices were still down by quite a bit, when it did, it did, it printed at -18.12%&#8230; But! The media was all over that like a cheap suit, clamoring that the spiral down in Home Prices had come to and end! Which, may be true&#8230; But wouldn&#8217;t you want to wait to see if next month&#8217;s report confirms it? And&#8230; By the way&#8230; Since when does -18.12% fall in home prices beckon a rally? Yesterday, would be that answer!</p>
<p>So&#8230; The currency rally that was going on for a 4th day, was quickly wiped out, Ventures style&#8230; What? Don’t know who the Ventures are? Boy, you really missed a lot of great instrumentals! Any way, the euro sunk like the Titanic from a level of 1.4130 to 1.40&#8230; The iceberg that caused this mess was simply the fact that traders, etc. believe the U.S. is on its way out of this mess&#8230; Of course, they must not be Pfennig readers, because&#8230; They would have read yesterday how I detailed the monthly numbers and showed how even with the spiral down in Home Prices ending, it would take until 2011 before the Home Prices got back to zero!</p>
<p>But NOOOOOOO!!!! They couldn&#8217;t read it until late yesterday afternoon, because&#8230; Houston, we had a problem, with the Pfennig&#8217;s delivery yesterday&#8230; See, how I&#8217;ve mellowed? I&#8217;m not even going to rant about this&#8230; Instead, I&#8217;ll just remind everyone that whenever the Pfennig doesn&#8217;t show up in your email box, you can most likely find it to read on the Pfennig&#8217;s website, where you can view that &#8220;glamour shot&#8221; of me, and archives of the Pfennig! You can find it here: www.dailypfennig.com &#8212;- Hope that helps!</p>
<p>OK&#8230; Well&#8230; After the thrill is gone, and the dust settled on all that yesterday, the euro is leading the other currencies higher once again&#8230; Here are a few things that have caused a sell-off of the dollar overnight once again&#8230;</p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;m a fan of his&#8230; In fact, I don&#8217;t really care at all&#8230; But George Soros, normally has some interesting things to say, that end up being bang on&#8230; So here are a few one liners from a speech by George Soros yesterday&#8230; I believe this sounds very much like the things I tell you, have told you, and will continue to tell you&#8230;</p>
<p>SOROS SAYS SEES A &#8220;STOP-GO&#8221; ECONOMY GOING FORWARD<br />
SOROS SAYS SELF-CORRECTING MARKETS IS A MISCONCEPTION<br />
SOROS SAYS INFLATION FEARS WILL DRIVE UP RATES AS MARKETS REVIVE, CHOKING OFF GROWTH<br />
SOROS SAYS CURRENT SUPER BUBBLE MADE POSSIBLE BY PAST INTERVENTION, EFFORT TO RESOLVE PREVIOUS BUBBLES<br />
SOROS SAYS FORMER FED CHAIRMAN GREENSPAN REFUSED TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR STOPPING BUBBLES</p>
<p>And then there was Alice Rivlin, she of former Budget Director, and former Fed Reserve member, fame, had a few things to say to the House Budget Committee&#8230; Good stuff, but you have to wonder if anyone was paying attention! Here&#8217;s Alice!</p>
<p>&#8220;The long term budget outlook: impending<br />
catastrophe&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;No one needs to remind this Committee that the outlook for the federal budget is worrisome indeed, scary. Long before the financial crisis and the current deep recession, this Committee was anxiously pointing out that current federal spending and revenue policies are on a risky, unsustainable course. Promises made under the major entitlement programs (especially Medicare and Medicaid) will increase federal spending rapidly over the next couple of decades, as the population ages and medical spending continues to rise faster than other spending. Federal expenditures are projected to grow substantially faster than revenues, opening widening deficit gaps that cannot not be financed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230; Sounds like me too! Is this &#8220;sound like Chuck day?&#8221; HA!</p>
<p>OK&#8230; Enough of all that, I don&#8217;t want anyone to get hurt, and I should have told everyone to put away the sharp objects before reading!</p>
<p>In other data yesterday, Consumer Confidence took a step backward, and fell in June to 49.3 from May&#8217;s figure of 54.8&#8230; Maybe those that were surveyed has just read Alive Rivlin&#8217;s talk to the House Budget Committee! Seriously though, this was a surprise, given the fat that the DOW gained 838 points in the 2nd QTR! At least, that&#8217;s what the Wall Street Journal said!</p>
<p>Today, we get a truckload of data starting with Challenger Job Cuts, and the ADP Employment Change. Those are followed by the ISM Manufacturing Index, Construction Spending, Pending Home Sales and Vehicle Sales&#8230; Not a lot of &#8220;major&#8221; data prints, but still stuff to check the pulse of the economy.</p>
<p>I was talking to my good friend, and an economics professor at a prestigious University, yesterday, and she mentioned that &#8220;this piece of data is questionable as to the inputs&#8221;&#8230; I said to her&#8230; &#8220;What piece of data isn&#8217;t questionable these days?&#8221;</p>
<p>OK&#8230; The &#8220;demand for high yield&#8221; was put on hold yesterday&#8230; But it will return, or at least I should say I think it will return&#8230; I don&#8217;t know for sure to say &#8220;it will&#8221;, so had better make the legal beagles happy&#8230; That&#8217;s funny! To say that they would be &#8220;happy&#8221; with me&#8230; They cringe, and get very uncomfortable every day when they read the Pfennig! HA!</p>
<p>But you know me&#8230; I&#8217;m just trying to provide Market Commentary, and other things that I think are important, well, important to me that is!</p>
<p>Like&#8230; A long time reader sent me a note yesterday, and said, &#8220;hey Chuck, did you see the story in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) on Foreign Demand for Treasuries?&#8221; Well, I hadn&#8217;t and went immediately to the WSJ, and there it was&#8230; Tucked away in a corner so that no one would see it, if they weren&#8217;t looking for it&#8230; A story, by Min Zeng, titled, &#8220;Is Foreign Demand As Solid As It Looks?</p>
<p>These are the things that really TICK ME OFF folks, so stay with me on this&#8230; Basically, as we all know the U.S. Treasury Auctions have been getting &#8220;covered&#8221; easily recently&#8230; And foreign demand was listed as the reason&#8230; Which would have been the exact opposite of what I was saying about foreigners shying away from Treasuries&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the skinny&#8230; But I&#8217;ll let Min Zeng tell it, since he did the research and brought this to the public, even though it was tucked away so no one would notice!</p>
<p>&#8220;But in a little-noticed switch on June 1, the Treasury changed the way it accounts for indirect bids, putting more buyers under that umbrella and boosting the portion of recent Treasury sales that the market perceived were being bought by foreigners.</p>
<p>The new definitions are deep in the arcane world of Treasury auctions. The change involves buyers who place orders through primary dealers. Those had been counted as direct buyers, but as of June 1 they were classified as indirect buyers, making that group larger than before. Because investors view that group as being dominated by foreign buyers, they assumed foreign demand was higher.&#8221;</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; OK, back to me&#8230; Ahhh, so that&#8217;s what&#8217;s going on&#8230; The Treasury &#8220;moved the goal posts on us&#8221;&#8230; As Sylvester would say&#8230; That&#8217;s despicable! Why isn&#8217;t someone in Washington D.C. shouting from the roof tops about this? Oh, that&#8217;s right, they&#8217;re all in cahoots!</p>
<p>This is HUGE folks&#8230; So&#8230; When the markets were thinking that foreign demand was increasing, it was actually, as I had said, shying away from Treasuries! Which, if the market participants are thinking that as long as foreigners are &#8220;buying into our deficit spending&#8221; then the dollar will be on terra firma, but instead are getting &#8220;duped&#8221; by the U.S. Treasury, you would think that someone would have some xplainin to do&#8230; Right Lucy?</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s another thing that just ticked me off when I read it this morning&#8230; Recall, last week I told you about how someone in China was dissing the talk that China&#8217;s stimulus was working, and that China would not be recovering, which sent the Aussie dollar to the woodshed until this news had passed? Well&#8230; Talk about egg on their face! Here&#8217;s the skinny&#8230;</p>
<p>China’s manufacturing expanded for a fourth month in June&#8230; The official Purchasing Managers’ Index rose to a seasonally adjusted 53.2 in June from 53.1 in May&#8230; And just like here in the U.S. any reading above 50 is thought to show manufacturing is expanding&#8230; The manufacturing index in the U.S. is around 44, so&#8230; We DO have the tale of two economies&#8230;</p>
<p>In one corner, we have the Chinese who have spent about $585 Billion worth of renminbi in stimulus, and are seeing the results&#8230; Whereas in the other corner we have the U.S. who have spent&#8230; More money than you can shake a stick at, and are not seeing green shoots like they &#8220;think they are&#8221;, instead they see dandelions, and weeds!</p>
<p>And the currencies of Australia and New Zealand have responded positively to this news from China&#8230;</p>
<p>And since I&#8217;m talking about China, might as well check on the other members of the BRIC&#8217;s (Brazil, Russia, India and China) Brazil&#8217;s real just posted its best quarterly performance on record, and India was Asia&#8217;s 3rd best performing currency, and if you throw out the two currencies above India that are illiquid, South Korea, and Indonesia, India was the best performing currency in Asia in the second QTR&#8230;</p>
<p>And the people over at the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) believe that the rupee won&#8217;t stop here&#8230; RBS issued a research report calling for a record 11% gain by the rupee in the 3rd QTR&#8230; I bet this news is music to the ears of my colleague on the &#8220;other&#8221; newsletter that I write&#8230; The Currency Capitalist&#8230; (to find out more: https://www.web-purchases.com/CUC/WCUCJ900/landing) My colleague, Ashish Advani, at the <a href="http://www.SovereignSociety.com"  class="alinks_links">Sovereign Society</a>, has been saying the rupee would be a strong performer for months now!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s something you might want to be aware of, regarding the New Zealand dollar / kiwi&#8230; About $4.5 Billion in kiwi Uridashi and euro kiwi bonds denominated in kiwi will expire next month&#8230; I&#8217;m told that this is more than 4 times the size of a usual monthly expiration of bonds. This could very well be the hoola hoop the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) is looking for, given their wish that kiwi would weaken&#8230;</p>
<p>Royal Bank of Canada&#8217;s Currency guru, Sue Trinh, says that kiwi weakness could be beneficial to Aussie dollars, as the Japanese are leaning toward Aussie over kiwi these days&#8230;</p>
<p>Sounds about right to me!</p>
<p>And then there was this&#8230; OK, you all saw that Bernie Madoff was given 150 years in prison&#8230; Did you see that his wife, Ruth, reached an agreement with the authorities to return all of her wealth except $2.5 million that she got to keep? The thing that I still don&#8217;t get is how there aren&#8217;t more people going down with the ship on this one&#8230; I&#8217;ve been in the back office of brokerage firms, ran a margin dept, etc. and know this wasn&#8217;t just Bernie and his accountant&#8230; There was a lot of wool pulled over many eyes&#8230; And this will be the next step in the investigation by the U.S. officials&#8230; To see, who else knew what&#8230; If a whole stable full of people aren&#8217;t found to have known, then I&#8217;ll be surprised&#8230;</p>
<p>Currencies today 7/1/09: A$ .8045, kiwi .6410, C$ .8640, euro 1.4050, sterling 1.6430, Swiss .9220, rand 7.7675, krone 6.39, SEK 7.6337, forint 192.50, zloty 3.1390, koruna 18.3315, yen 96.90, sing 1.4475, HKD 7.75, INR 47.90, China 6.8330, pesos 13.18, BRL 1.9515, dollar index 80.11, Oil $71.27, 10-year 3.54%, Silver $13.67, and Gold&#8230; $931.20</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for today&#8230; So sorry about the tardiness of the Pfennig yesterday, but I can&#8217;t do anything about it when we have technical difficulties&#8230; You know that I get up before the milkman, and the paper man, to get here to write it&#8230; It wasn&#8217;t like I was dilly-dallying around and didn&#8217;t get it done until 5 in the evening! HA! I see that my little buddy, Alex, got a 2nd and 3rd in backstroke and freestyle respectively at his latest swim meet. Really long time readers might recall when Alex&#8217;s older brother, Andrew was a highly decorated swimmer, and I would write about his swimming records&#8230; And their sister Dawn, also was a medal winner as a young girl! So&#8230; It&#8217;s now up to granddaughter, Delaney Grace to carry on the swimming tradition! HA! Cards lose again&#8230; UGH! OK&#8230; Time to try to get this out the door, hopefully it will go without a hitch&#8230; But whether it does or doesn&#8217;t it won&#8217;t stop me from having a Wonderful Wednesday&#8230; How about you?</p>
<p><a href="http://dailypfennig.com/currentIssue.aspx?date=7/1/2009">Source: The U.S. Treasury Moves The Goal Posts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-us-treasury-moves-the-goal-posts/18623/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment News Briefs Thursday June 18, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-thursday-june-18-2009/18070</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-thursday-june-18-2009/18070#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Money Morning Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRK.A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRK.B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBHI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMGMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Cpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation Fears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Consumer Prices Increase Less Than Expected; Ten Banks Repay TARP Debt; Bankrupt Eddie Bauer Attempts Sale; Berkshire Hathaway Options Begin Trading; FedEx Losses Mount; Saab Cuts Debt; Gas Prices Keep Going, Going, Up; Boeing Gets First Air Show Order; China Will Invest Sovereign Wealth in Hedge Funds; Analyst: S&#38;P 500 Will Hit New Highs By 2012; Bond Yields Drop; Mortgage Apps Plunge</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Inflation fears were quelled at least temporarily as U.S. consumer prices were raised only slightly last month, and actually experienced their biggest drop in almost 60 years. Higher gas prices contributed to the 0.1% increase in the Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) versus the April’s CPI, which was flat. Financial markets had expected a 0.3% increase. The CPI&#8230;</li></ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer Prices Increase Less Than Expected; Ten Banks Repay TARP Debt; Bankrupt Eddie Bauer Attempts Sale; Berkshire Hathaway Options Begin Trading; FedEx Losses Mount; Saab Cuts Debt; Gas Prices Keep Going, Going, Up; Boeing Gets First Air Show Order; China Will Invest Sovereign Wealth in Hedge Funds; Analyst: S&amp;P 500 Will Hit New Highs By 2012; Bond Yields Drop; Mortgage Apps Plunge</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Inflation fears were quelled at least temporarily as U.S. consumer prices were raised only slightly last month, and actually experienced their biggest drop in almost 60 years. Higher gas prices contributed to the 0.1% increase in the Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) versus the April’s CPI, which was flat. Financial markets had expected a 0.3% increase. The CPI fell 1.3% versus the same period last year, the largest drop since April 1950. &#8220;There is no sign that there has been widespread inflation because of the Fed’s quantitative easing regime. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN1732991520090617">In fact, long-term inflation expectations haven’t budged and the Fed is still ahead of curve on inflation</a>,&#8221; economic and investment strategist John Canally of <a href="http://lplfinancial.lpl.com/">LPL Financial</a> told <strong><em>Reuters</em>.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Four of the nation’s largest banks <a href="http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aSmLfH2N0h0s">repaid $54.7 billion to the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program</a> (TARP), freeing themselves of government restrictions on lending and pay.<strong>JPMorgan &amp; Chase Co. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJPM">JPM</a>) repaid $25 billion, and<strong>Morgan Stanley </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMS">MS</a>) and <strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc.</strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGS">GS</a>) repaid $10 billion each, <strong><em>Bloomberg News </em></strong>reported. As <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a>’s </em></strong>Martin Hutchinson reported yesterday (Wednesday), the other two banks, <strong>U.S. Bancorp</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AUSB">USB</a>) and <strong>BB&amp;T Corporation </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABBT">BBT</a>) repaid their debts of $6.6 billion and $3.1 billion respectively. <a href="http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aSmLfH2N0h0s">The banks are among 10 other that agreed last week to repay $68 billion in TARP funds</a>,<strong><em>Bloomberg News </em></strong>reported. “Our strong capital position allowed us to pay back TARP in a very short amount of time,” BB&amp;T Chief Executive Officer Kelly King said in the bank’s statement.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Beleaguered outdoor clothing retailer <strong>Eddie Bauer Holdings Inc.</strong>(Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AEBHI">EBHI</a>) yesterday (Wednesday) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and said it planned to sell itself to private equity firm <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=9626489">CCMP Capital LLC</a></strong> for $202 million. The sale to CCMP, known as a <a href="http://library.findlaw.com/2004/Oct/27/133620.html">363 sale</a>, means the sale needs the approval of a judge, and other bidders could emerge. CCMP is entitled to a $5 million breakup fee if it loses to a higher bidder. Court filings show that <strong>Bank of America Corp. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC">BAC</a>), <strong>General Electric Company </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGE">GE</a>) and <strong>CIT Group Inc. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:CIT">CIT</a>) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/18/business/18bauer.html?ref=business">will provide up to $100 million in financing during the bankruptcy case</a>,<strong><em>The New York Times </em></strong>reported. Eddie Bauer said its 371 stores in the United States and Canada are operating as usual.<strong></strong></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Berkshire Hathaway Inc. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABRK.A">BRK.A</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABRK.B">BRK.B</a>) options will begin trading on the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ariNfbARVw9w">enabling investors to bet on the company using a technique Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Warren Buffet has rejected</a>, <strong><em>Bloomberg News </em></strong>reported. “Usually, if you want to buy or sell a stock, you should buy or sell the stock,” Buffett said last year on the weekend of the company’s annual meeting. “Using options, four times out of five you will be right, the last one you’ll miss. I’ve virtually never used options as a way to enter or exit a position.” CBOE will offer contracts on Buffet’s conglomerate starting today (Thursday).</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>FedEx Corp.’s </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AFDX">FDX</a>) losses more than tripled in its last quarter, and the company <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hqOcgeUaMb_AeJEbYhIzG6C-5MlQD98SIFE80">said things won’t be much better in the near future</a>, <strong><em>The Associated Press </em></strong>reported. The nation’s second-largest package shipper reported a loss of $876 million, or $2.82 per share in the quarter ended May 30. That compares to a loss of $241 million, or 78 cents per share in the same period last year. &#8220;The operating environment for our first two quarters in fiscal 2010 is expected to be extremely difficult,&#8221; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Alan B. Graf Jr. said. The company has not yet decided whether it will have to lay off more workers or make further cutbacks due to poor economic conditions, Graf said in a conference call with investors.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Newly sold automaker <strong>Saab </strong>secured a key court ruling yesterday (Wednesday) to cut 75% of the more than $1.28 billion (10 billion in Swedish crowns) of debt <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE55F1LO20090617">after a vast majority of creditors approved the proposal</a>, <strong><em>Reuters </em></strong>reported.  Sweden-based Saab was sold on Tuesday to fellow countrymen <strong><a href="http://www.koenigsegg.com/">Koenigsegg Group AB</a></strong>by soon-to-be former parent <strong>General Motors Corp. </strong>(OTC:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AGMGMQ">GMGMQ</a>).</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OIL_PRICES?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2009-06-17-15-32-05">The annual rise in gas prices entered its 50th straight day</a>yesterday (Wednesday) after crude prices bounced back after an initial slump in the beginning of this week, <strong><em>The Associated Press</em></strong>reported. Pump prices are now at a national average of $2.67 per gallon. The rising crude prices and less production has added to the typical increase in demand in the late spring and summer months as more Americans take to the roads for vacation-related travel.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>After being dogged by reports of orderless days at the Paris Air Show, <strong>The Boeing Co. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC">BA</a>) finally got a <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_FRANCE_AIR_SHOW?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">$153 million order for two single-aisle planes</a>, <strong><em>The Associated Press </em></strong>reported. But this order pales when compared to the $6.2 billion in orders already attained by rival <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=14150184">Airbus S.A.S</a>. </strong>Both aircraft makers are feeling the economic crunch by the worldwide recession.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>China will use part of its $200 billion sovereign wealth fund to invest in hedge funds, according to Felix Chee, who will initially run the fund. “<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ai5PLqcRXWyc">We will have a preference for managed accounts</a>,” he said in an interview with <strong><em>Bloomberg News</em></strong> Wednesday at the GAIM International hedge fund conference at Monaco’s Grimaldi Forum. “The platform would like a core of single-manager funds and fund-of-funds.” Chee, is a special adviser to the chief investment officer of <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=4&amp;url=http://www.china-inv.cn/cicen/&amp;ei=UlA5StmdGYqeMvS6gIsN&amp;usg=AFQjCNEHI_99qMy-4uJpc9JHyGzWmrnDow&amp;sig2=ZKWxaTkujKkkirG0kbVUtw">China Investment Corp.</a></strong>’s hedge fund and proprietary trading effort, “It’ll be across the spectrum of strategies,” he said. “We’re looking for the best managers and a handful of fund of funds, and when I say handful I mean five or less.”</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>A prominent Wall Street analyst sees the benchmark <strong>S&amp;P 500 Index</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX&amp;ei=clk5SteoH5i0NbvAwIYN&amp;usg=AFQjCNHBr3U_3S7tcS_hw3FhJZdrozuFfg&amp;sig2=g81Qz1UdTnVXu0-bxyYfVw">.INX</a>) breaking its all-time record by the end 2012. <strong>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:JPM&amp;ei=Olk5SoeqCY6UMsr16ZkN&amp;usg=AFQjCNEoZj4LfoOIg3OAF1WriNzZH9wxzg&amp;sig2=yZirGoP7V7f0x6aeZGpN6w">JPM</a>) Chief U.S. Equity Strategist Thomas Lee said on Wednesday the index should surge back above 1,500, its October 2007 high in less than three years, provided the U.S. economy sees a V-shaped recovery.  &#8220;<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE55G3UP20090617">The global economy is in the midst of a synchronized recovery</a>,&#8221; Lee said at the <strong><em>Reuters </em></strong>Investment Outlook Summit.  Lee also reiterated his year-end 2009 target of 1,100 for the S&amp;P 500, saying the United States will likely come out of its recession some time this summer, followed by the rest of the developed world.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Prices on <strong>Fannie Mae</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:FNM&amp;ei=-lg5St_PCKWkNfW2kIUN&amp;usg=AFQjCNE-NIueKj1m_BGF_aj5pjp5Icx2yA&amp;sig2=pcDi7ymmxrJPxEynwbEtTw">FNM</a>) and <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:FRE&amp;ei=4Vg5SvWoIZ3KMZGUrIgN&amp;usg=AFQjCNHdRk2fINlEjHlSH9RiCnFnfQQ6ig&amp;sig2=IL4Fa2qK8zzaDUSkJjdQYA">FRE</a>) mortgage securities rose for the fifth day Wednesday, pushing yields down as they tracked a drop in rates on benchmark U.S. Treasuries, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aW1TXVZHn9bg">foreshadowing possible further declines in borrowing costs for new home-loans.</a> Yields on Washington-based Fannie Mae’s 30- year fixed-rate mortgage bonds fell by 0.02% to 4.56% in New York trading, the lowest since June 3, according to data compiled by <strong><em>Bloomberg.</em></strong> Treasuries and so-called agency mortgage bonds rallied after a government report showed the cost of living rose less than forecast in May. The mortgage-bond yields are down from 5.07% on June 10, the highest level since the Federal Reserve announced plans to buy home-loan bonds in November.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Applications for mortgages fell for a fourth consecutive week, with overall demand <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSNYS00515720090617">plunging to its lowest level in nearly seven months</a>, according to a report Wednesday from the Mortgage Bankers Association.  Rising interest rates have tempered demand for refinancings and new purchase applications, as the industry group’s seasonally-adjusted index fell 15.8% to 514.4 for the week ended June 12, the lowest since the week ended November 21, 2008.  Rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 5.50%, down 0.07% from the previous week, but significantly higher than the all-time low of 4.61% set in the week ended March 27,<strong><em>Reuters</em></strong> reported.</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/18/investment-news-briefs-29/">Investment News Briefs Thursday June 18, 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-thursday-june-18-2009/18070/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four More Ways To Profit From U.S. Healthcare Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/four-more-ways-to-profit-from-us-healthcare-reform/18075</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/four-more-ways-to-profit-from-us-healthcare-reform/18075#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lichtenfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotech Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bond Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bond Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GENZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Lichtenfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RRPIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WPI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Both President Obama’s and Senator Kennedy’s healthcare plans are estimated to cost $1 trillion over 10 years.  I’ll believe it when I see it. When was the last time the government completed any project on budget?</p>
<p>For example, Health Systems Innovations, a healthcare consultant that has worked with private health insurers and the McCain presidential campaign, estimates that Senator Kennedy’s bill would cost $4 trillion over 10 years.</p>
<p>Should a healthcare plan be passed that even resembles anything like the current proposals, $2 trillion in costs would be a minor miracle.</p>
<p>A trillion here, a trillion there. Pretty soon, you’re talking about real money.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.smartprofitsreport.com/archives/government-interference-wont-damage-these-three-stocks.html">my column last week,</a> I offered three biotech stocks that should perform well, regardless of any healthcare reform plan that may be&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both President Obama’s and Senator Kennedy’s healthcare plans are estimated to cost $1 trillion over 10 years.  I’ll believe it when I see it. When was the last time the government completed any project on budget?</p>
<p>For example, Health Systems Innovations, a healthcare consultant that has worked with private health insurers and the McCain presidential campaign, estimates that Senator Kennedy’s bill would cost $4 trillion over 10 years.</p>
<p>Should a healthcare plan be passed that even resembles anything like the current proposals, $2 trillion in costs would be a minor miracle.</p>
<p>A trillion here, a trillion there. Pretty soon, you’re talking about real money.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.smartprofitsreport.com/archives/government-interference-wont-damage-these-three-stocks.html">my column last week,</a> I offered three biotech stocks that should perform well, regardless of any healthcare reform plan that may be passed. As those reforms gather momentum, I’m going to explore a few more investments that should thrive, even in the face of a healthcare system overhaul…<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Make Money From Bond Market Trouble</strong></p>
<p>Despite the President’s popularity, he’s not likely to get everything he wants. Some sort of compromise is likely. But it’s safe to assume that the cost of the healthcare plan will be a 13-figure number (i.e. more than $1 trillion).</p>
<p>On a macroeconomic level, that would likely be inflationary and cause bond prices to decline. So if you’re a bond bear, here are two investments for you…</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury ProShares</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=tbt">TBT</a>): This ETF is not for the faint-hearted. It seeks to perform at twice the inverse results of the Lehman Brothers 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Index. So if the Index drops 5%, TBT should return rise about 10%.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>ProFunds Rising Rate Opportunity</strong> (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=RRPIX">RRPIX</a>): This is a mutual fund that also seeks the inverse performance of the bond market. Its results aim to correspond to 125% of the inverse of the daily movement of the 30-year Treasury bond.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><br />
How To Buy Genzyme For $47.50</strong></p>
<p>In last week’s column, I discussed the attractiveness of biotech companies that treat rare diseases.</p>
<p>But one of those names, <strong>Genzyme</strong> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GENZ">GENZ</a>), had a major setback this week when it disclosed problems at one of its manufacturing facilities.</p>
<p>I believe these difficulties are temporary and I still like the company. But if you’d prefer to reduce your risk further, you can look at selling put options on GENZ at a lower strike price.</p>
<p>And when it comes to selling puts, look no further than Lee Lowell. He’s the master at this strategy and is currently riding a 100% winning streak since his <em><a href="http://oxfordonline.com/IMT/IMT0509mini.html?pub=IMT&amp;code=EIMT501">Instant Money Trader,</a></em> which focuses exclusively on this strategy, began last November.</p>
<p>I explained to Lee why I like GENZ, but wanted a good put-selling trade for investors who want to own the stock at a lower price. Here’s what he suggested…</p>
<ul>
<li>Sell the October 2009 $47.50 puts, currently trading at $1.85 on the bid. This means for every put that you sell, you will collect $185.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Keep in mind that one put contract represents 100 shares.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>If GENZ never sees the $47.50 strike, you keep the $185.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>If the stock drops to or below $47.50 at expiration, you’ll be required to buy the stock for $47.50 (100 shares of GENZ for every put contract you sell). But remember, that you collected $1.85 already, reducing your cost basis to $45.65.</li>
</ul>
<p>So if you like GENZ, but would prefer to own it at a lower price, this is one trade to consider.<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Add Watson To Your Watchlist</strong></p>
<p>In my column last week, I also suggested best-in-class generic drug maker <strong>Teva Pharmaceuticals</strong> (Nasdaq:<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=teva">TEVA</a>).</p>
<p>Another generic drug maker to look at is <strong>Watson Pharmaceuticals</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=wpi">WPI</a>). Watson just announced its acquisition of privately held Arrow Group, a generic biotech drug maker, with significant international operations.</p>
<p>I like this move by Watson, as it broadens the company’s reach both in products and markets served.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that while healthcare reform could very well change the investing landscape within the sector, you can always find opportunities if you know where to look.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smartprofitsreport.com/spr/healthcare-reform-2.html">Source: Four More Ways To Profit From U.S. Healthcare Reform</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/four-more-ways-to-profit-from-us-healthcare-reform/18075/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What TARP Banks Are Investment Grade?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/what-tarp-banks-are-investment-grade/17996</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/what-tarp-banks-are-investment-grade/17996#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hutchinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Hutchinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Share Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US banking crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WFC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A total of 10 U.S. banks have now repaid the preference share investments in them made by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), thus demonstrating that the government thinks they are sound. A number of others have yet to pay back that federal infusion. For investors, the question is this: Where do we go from here?</p>
<p>Do we believe the government’s clean bill of health on the 10 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TARP" target="_blank">TARP</a> escapees, and do we mark down the shares of the banks that remain in the government’s debt?</p>
<p>The question is a simple one. But the answer is anything but clear-cut.</p>
<p>At the extremes, the question isn’t difficult. Citigroup (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AC" target="_blank">C</a>) is being forced to raise $55 billion of capital through preferred stock conversion, and even&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A total of 10 U.S. banks have now repaid the preference share investments in them made by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), thus demonstrating that the government thinks they are sound. A number of others have yet to pay back that federal infusion. For investors, the question is this: Where do we go from here?</p>
<p>Do we believe the government’s clean bill of health on the 10 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TARP" target="_blank">TARP</a> escapees, and do we mark down the shares of the banks that remain in the government’s debt?</p>
<p>The question is a simple one. But the answer is anything but clear-cut.</p>
<p>At the extremes, the question isn’t difficult. Citigroup (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AC" target="_blank">C</a>) is being forced to raise $55 billion of capital through preferred stock conversion, and even then is not sure of survival. In addition to the federal TARP injections, Citi has benefited from a $300 billion guarantee of its assets. It has been forced to sell some of its major subsidiaries, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/05/01/citigroup-japanese-brokerage/" target="_blank">including Japanese broker Nikko Cordial Securities</a>, which it bought only two years ago. Its chief executive officer, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=C.N&amp;officerId=951615" target="_blank">Vikram S. Pandit</a>, cost Citi $600 million<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/02/01/vikram-pandit-citigroups-27-million-man/" target="_blank">when the bank lured</a> him <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2007/12/10/citigroup-ceo-search/" target="_blank">into the organization by buying out his hedge fund</a> two years ago.</p>
<p>That hedge fund was subsequently closed. And it’s by no means clear that Pandit has the skills needed to run a low-risk financial behemoth whose future should be oriented towards doing stuff that is very simple.</p>
<p>With Citi’s stock trading at about $3.50 a share, investors may feel the chance is worth taking. But given the company’s long history of serial financial disasters, it must be much more likely that the government will eventually be badgered by taxpayers into losing patience with the mess, resulting in its final dismemberment with little or no payoff for shareholders.</p>
<p>At the opposite end of the banking-bailout spectrum, at least two of the banks that have paid off TARP &#8211; U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AUSB" target="_blank">USB</a>) and BB&amp;T Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABBT" target="_blank">BBT</a>) &#8211; seem to be in good shape, and indeed have expressed indignation at being forced to go through the demeaning TARP process at all.</p>
<p>Their shareholders should be equally indignant: Both banks have been forced to raise capital while their share prices were still depressed, and to slash their dividends from levels that had literally taken years to build up. It will be interesting to see whether either bank has the moxie to restore its previous dividend in full in the coming quarter. Doing so would be a sign of management that was both confident and shareholder-friendly &#8211; and of an outlook for each bank that was decidedly favorable.</p>
<p>Certainly, however tempting it may be for these banks to assert their strength by taking over weaker neighbors, their dividends should be fully restored as a matter of principle before they <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/05/banking-buyouts/" target="_blank">go out on any acquisition binges</a>. The last few years have seen <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/06/us-banks-federal-bailout/" target="_blank">far too many self-aggrandizing management schemes</a> that are engineered at the expense of shareholders, and a policy of acquisitions-before-dividend restoration would signal that management has still not received the message of how a responsible financial institution should be run.</p>
<p>If all the banks still in TARP were like Citigroup, and all those that had escaped were like USB and BBT, the government would have done a great job, and investors would have useful information. However, they’re not. Among the escapees is Capital One Financial Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=cof" target="_blank">COF</a>). Capital One has raised $1.5 billion in new equity, but it made losses in the first quarter and is a leader in the subprime credit card segment, surely close to the next epicenter of the ongoing financial crisis. It doesn’t help that Congress has also <a href="http://americanaffairs.suite101.com/article.cfm/obama_credit_card_reform_act_passes_congress" target="_blank">passed a credit card reform act</a>outlawing many of Capital One’s favorite practices. In short, nothing will convince me that Capital One is a safe place for your investment dollars, and my best guess is that before the end of this year we will know that the government blew this one big-time.</p>
<p>In the final quadrant, those that have not repaid TARP but appear to be in good shape, we have Wells Fargo &amp; Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWFC" target="_blank">WFC</a>) and PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=pnc" target="_blank">PNC</a>). Both appear to have been in relatively good shape from their own operations, but during the crisis bought banks of equivalent size to themselves that had made a mess of things: Wells bought <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWB" target="_blank">Wachovia Corp</a>. and <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2008/10/pnc_buys_national_city_for_52b.php" target="_blank">PNC bought</a> the Cleveland-based <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=11102642" target="_blank">National City Corp</a>. Their failure to repay TARP may mean that further problems are lurking under the hood in the banks they acquired; Wachovia, in particular, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12680868/from/RSS/" target="_blank">made an exceptionally foolish acquisition by spending an estimated $25 billion</a> to buy the huge California mortgage bank, Golden West Financial, in August 2006.</p>
<p>But only time will tell. Both Wachovia and PNC are worth watching closely. If, during the next couple of quarters, only medium-sized problems surface, then it’s likely that these institutions will emerge stronger from their deals and will be well worth an investment.</p>
<p>The bottom line: Keep an eye on Wells Fargo and PNC, but don’t buy them yet. If either U.S. Bancorp (which is due to declare a dividend in the next few days) or BBT restores their previous quarterly dividends of 43 cents and 47 cents, respectively, back the truck up and buy!</p>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/17/tarp-banks/">What TARP Banks Are Investment Grade?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/what-tarp-banks-are-investment-grade/17996/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street vs. Main Street: The Regulatory Battle Begins Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-street-vs-main-street-the-regulatory-battle-begins-tomorrow/17937</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-street-vs-main-street-the-regulatory-battle-begins-tomorrow/17937#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shah Gilani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shah Gilani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner says the Obama administration&#8217;s overhaul of U.S. financial regulations is aimed at creating a &#8220;boring&#8221; financial system.  But after President Barack Obama unveils this boring &#8211; and not-so-new &#8211; regulatory structure tomorrow (Wednesday), expect a pitched battle that will pit the interests of Wall Street players against those of everyday Main Street investors.</p>
<p>The outcome could well determine how quickly and completely this country&#8217;s financial system rebounds from the ongoing crisis. And that outcome will also likely determine whether or not we&#8217;ll ever have to face something as dangerous and damaging as this again.</p>
<p>By unveiling its proposals for revamping the U.S. regulatory architecture that houses the agencies and watchdogs responsible for safeguarding the financial system&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner says the Obama administration&#8217;s overhaul of U.S. financial regulations is aimed at creating a &#8220;boring&#8221; financial system.  But after President Barack Obama unveils this boring &#8211; and not-so-new &#8211; regulatory structure tomorrow (Wednesday), expect a pitched battle that will pit the interests of Wall Street players against those of everyday Main Street investors.</p>
<p>The outcome could well determine how quickly and completely this country&#8217;s financial system rebounds from the ongoing crisis. And that outcome will also likely determine whether or not we&#8217;ll ever have to face something as dangerous and damaging as this again.</p>
<p>By unveiling its proposals for revamping the U.S. regulatory architecture that houses the agencies and watchdogs responsible for safeguarding the financial system that supports our way of life, President Obama is touching off a bruising battle &#8211; but one that probably has an unfortunate, and predictable, outcome. Unlike the more-aggressive overhaul proposals <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a></em></strong> previously outlined for both <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/19/financial-crisis-regulations/" target="_blank">the regulatory system</a> and the <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/02/25/repair-us-banking-system/" target="_blank">U.S. banking system</a>, the reality here is that the current set of regulators will survive.</p>
<p>The $64 trillion dollar question was whether or not the existing limp and dysfunctional alphabet soup of regulators that were supposed to be the watchdogs of our way of life will actually be reconstituted into a new stew with the same ingredients &#8211; or whether a new kitchen crew would be empowered to stop Wall Street from force-feeding the public its same old toxic menu.</p>
<p>Thanks to details that have already been leaked to the public, the answer is already clear.</p>
<p>Front running its own public offering of a regulatory makeover, the Obama administration <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aCKrIaHpFovo" target="_blank">has been systematically leaking the guts of the &#8220;white paper</a>&#8221; it plans to deliver tomorrow. The reason for the soft opening is that President Obama wanted to avoid a knee-jerk reaction in the financial markets. Plus, there&#8217;s a history of political backlash and negative public opinion when it comes to any balancing act regulating the powerful cabal of bankers and brokers.</p>
<p>The crazy patchwork quilt of regulators overseeing our banks, bankers, brokers, investment products and markets is an inventory of acronyms that includes:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The Federal Reserve Board (FRB).</li>
<li>The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).</li>
<li>The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).</li>
<li>The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).</li>
<li>The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).</li>
<li>And the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</li>
</ul>
<p>But that&#8217;s not the end of it. Operating under the SEC are certain &#8220;self regulatory organizations&#8221; (SROs), including the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB), which police their own registered and licensed persons, the products they sell and trade and the public who they deal with.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s also the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and a slew of state regulators who also act to ensure the integrity of financial intermediaries, products, and markets.<strong></strong></p>
<p>The question on everyone&#8217;s mind is this: &#8220;Where were any of these kitchen hands when all the burners on the financial stove were turned all the way up and every pot on the stove was boiling over?&#8221;</p>
<p>Citing the myriad signals and obvious cracks that regulators missed or egregiously overlooked would easily fill a few volumes. And while it is instructive and incumbent upon us to not forget our history &#8211; lest we repeat it &#8211; there is enough still fresh in our minds to avoid dwelling on the past in favor of taking steps to make sure something this potentially ruinous never happen again.</p>
<p>With such a mindset, it&#8217;s natural to conclude that our failed regulatory architecture needs a serious overhaul.</p>
<p>In his inaugural speech, President Obama directly addressed the need for more effective and protective regulation of Wall Street. Echoing the president&#8217;s public position, Treasury Secretary Geithner recently said to the <a href="http://www.icba.org/" target="_blank">Independent Community Bankers of America</a> (ICBA) trade group, &#8220;I think the president believes we need to have a much more simplified, consolidated oversight structure.&#8221;</p>
<p>But sadly, true to the inviolate nature of politics and the power of entrenched and vested money interests, this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to actually tear down the failed structures that guarantee another economic collapse and to replace them once and for all with a substantive regulatory structure that can stave off future financial tsunamis isn&#8217;t likely to happen.</p>
<p>It seems that the Obama administration&#8217;s sensitivity to potentially jeopardizing what some are pointing to as signs of recovery by not calling for radical regulatory surgery has resulted in signals that the approach will instead be to empower existing regulators with more patches and some needles and thread. In a clear about-face, the administration is quietly soft-selling its upcoming agenda for regulatory reform by making the case that the overlap of multiple agencies actually prevents any one agency from being subjected to undue political or commercial interests or influence.</p>
<p>What the administration is billing as a &#8220;sweeping reorganization&#8221; of financial supervision actually results in few major changes &#8211; and does nothing to address the turf wars and political power of the congressional fiefdoms that serve the greater interests of their lobbying masters.</p>
<p>To say this is unfortunate is an understatement with no rivals.</p>
<p>There is nothing in the offering plate that addresses the failed doctrine of &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Too_Big_to_Fail_policy" target="_blank">Too Big to Fail</a>.&#8221; While there are proposals to rein in leverage and to toughen capital and liquidity standards there are no proposed limits on curbing the monster machines of finance that will only get larger and larger and will eventually figure out how to break out of any paper cage they&#8217;re put in, meaning at some point they&#8217;ll be at large and able to threaten the world again.</p>
<p>There is nothing that directly reins in over-the-counter <a href="http://www.margrabe.com/Dictionary.html" target="_blank">derivative products</a>, or the sales and trading of these highly speculative (make that &#8220;gambling&#8221;) devices. Lately, we&#8217;ve been joined in our concerns by George Soros &#8211; king of speculators in his own right &#8211; calling for the complete abolishment of certain derivatives. But that&#8217;s not going to happen, because too many banks make too much money off these &#8220;instruments&#8221; of economic destruction.</p>
<p>As we&#8217;ve noted previously, there <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/10/private-equity-bank-investments/" target="_blank">is nothing to stop clever players from shopping</a> the regulatory <a href="http://www.margrabe.com/Dictionary.html" target="_blank">smorgasbord</a> of supervision servicers to find a friendly hall monitor who will accept their made-up class cutting and test-avoidance excuses.</p>
<p>There is nothing to rein in the U.S. Federal Reserve&#8217;s independent power as omnipotent God wagging the tail of the U.S. Treasury Department as it sees fit. In fact, the Fed will be offered more power and more control over the nation&#8217;s largest financial institutions. That makes the too-big-to-be-controlled Fed a vested partner in the drive to make the system too big to do anything but fail.</p>
<p>There is nothing to address who really will have the newly proposed power to unwind institutions deemed to be a systemic threat. The idea is to empower a &#8220;council&#8221; to determine just who those systemic threats actually are. Will the council&#8217;s power be absolute, or will that power go to the Fed, the Treasury, the FDIC, or all three to fight about? Although it&#8217;s unlikely that special interests would ever try to lean on any of the competing supervisors charged with threatening the life of a major corporation making many insiders very rich, it conceivably could happen. Let&#8217;s be honest &#8211; it already has.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s supposedly new is the idea of a consumer-protection regulator. But here&#8217;s the problem: Weren&#8217;t all the regulators supposed to be consumer advocates all along?</p>
<p>The inclination to retain the failed patchwork of a regulatory-quilt-in-tatters would be a major victory for Wall Street. Unless the American public wants to subject itself to more and deeper financial catastrophes, it must weigh in on the battle against the Wall Street machine.</p>
<p>The opportunity to recreate the walls and bridges that once were in place and have been dismantled &#8211; and to build a new and better fortification to protect the country from the greed and avarice of a few too many &#8211; is right in front of us.</p>
<p>And we may not have this opportunity again.</p>
<p>To that end, we should not be lulled into a sense of false security by believing that the existing regulatory architecture can be fixed. What&#8217;s being rolled out tomorrow is more about rolling over and pretending everything is now okay than it is about engineering real, substantive change.</p>
<p>It is now or never.</p>
<p>By electing President Obama, the majority of Americans voted for change. Whether or not we actually get that change is now largely up to each of us, and promises to be a function of whether or not we actually demand that change loudly enough.</p>
<p><strong>[Editor's Note: Is it a new bull market, or just a bear-market rally that's going to separate investors from the last of their cash? For the shrewdest investors, it may not matter. A <a href="http://partners.moneymorningaffiliates.com/z/337/CD15/">new offer</a>from <em>Money Morning</em> is a two-way win for investors: Noted commentator Peter D. Schiff's new book - "<a href="http://partners.moneymorningaffiliates.com/z/337/CD15/">The Little Book of Bull Moves in Bear Markets</a>" - shows investors how to profit no matter which way the market moves, while our monthly newsletter, <em>The <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/resources/moneymapreport.html"  class="alinks_links">Money Map Report</a></em>, provides ongoing analysis of the global financial markets and some of the best profit plays you'll find anywhere - including such markets as Taiwan and China. To find out how to get both, <a href="http://partners.moneymorningaffiliates.com/z/337/CD15/">check out our newest offer</a>. </strong></p>
<p><strong>To read a related story on how the long-term dismantling of U.S. banking regulations set the stage for the U.S. financial crisis, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/16/financial-regulation-battles/" target="_blank">please click here</a>. That story, which appears elsewhere in today's issue of </strong><em><strong>Money Morning</strong></em><strong>, is available free of charge.]</strong></p>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/16/financial-regulation-overhaul/">Wall Street vs. Main Street: The Regulatory Battle Begins Tomorrow</a></p>
<p><img src="http://partners.moneymorningaffiliates.com/42/CD15/337/" border="0" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-street-vs-main-street-the-regulatory-battle-begins-tomorrow/17937/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>G8 Finance Chiefs Express Cautious Optimism About the State of the World Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/g8-finance-chiefs-express-cautious-optimism-about-the-state-of-the-world-economy/17890</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/g8-finance-chiefs-express-cautious-optimism-about-the-state-of-the-world-economy/17890#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AXXP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIATY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Derivatives Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMGMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<h4>Top financial officials from the <a href="http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761589420/Group_of_Eight.html" target="_blank">Group of Eight</a> (G8) industrialized nations on Friday issued an upbeat evaluation of the global financial crisis, describing signs that markets were stabilizing around the world and warning that it was necessary to devise “exit strategies” to disengage from stimulus programs that have been put in place.<br />
</h4>
<p>The G8 met for two days in Lecce, Italy. Eight world finance ministers – including U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, and his global counterparts from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Russia – also agreed to create &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/13/AR2009061301479.html?hpid=sec-business" target="_blank">a set of common principles and standards</a> governing the conduct of international business and finance,&#8221;<strong><em>The Washington Post</em></strong> reported.</p>
<p>In a communiqué called &#8220;the Lecce Framework&#8221; – which described the strategy for obtaining those goals –&#8230;</p></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<h4>Top financial officials from the <a href="http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761589420/Group_of_Eight.html" target="_blank">Group of Eight</a> (G8) industrialized nations on Friday issued an upbeat evaluation of the global financial crisis, describing signs that markets were stabilizing around the world and warning that it was necessary to devise “exit strategies” to disengage from stimulus programs that have been put in place.<br />
</h4>
<p>The G8 met for two days in Lecce, Italy. Eight world finance ministers – including U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, and his global counterparts from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Russia – also agreed to create &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/13/AR2009061301479.html?hpid=sec-business" target="_blank">a set of common principles and standards</a> governing the conduct of international business and finance,&#8221;<strong><em>The Washington Post</em></strong> reported.</p>
<p>In a communiqué called &#8220;the Lecce Framework&#8221; – which described the strategy for obtaining those goals – the finance ministers called on government leaders to fill in the regulatory gaps that led to the global financial crisis, including breakdowns caused by financial firms that operated in multiple economies.</p>
<p>Strikingly more rigorous initiatives already are being adopted in Europe, where new measures aimed at creating more-rigorous oversight of the credit-rating agencies – especially those involved with creating securitized securities, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/18/debt-rating-agencies/" target="_blank">whose U.S. breakdowns have been identified as a key contributor</a> to the credit crisis. The United States will offer its own broad proposals for &#8220;more conservative standards&#8221; when it unveils a much-anticipated reform plan to overhaul domestic financial regulation later this week, Geithner said in an interview after the meeting.</p>
<p>The U.S. will include tougher proposed capital standards and oversight for banks, better coordinated oversight of global financial institutions, and improve monitoring and transparency in global derivatives markets,<strong><em>The Post</em></strong> reported.</p>
<p>&#8220;Because risk does not respect borders, we will put forward several international proposals in our reform package to help raise standards globally,&#8221; Geithner told journalists after the meeting.</p>
<p>With recent rebound in stock markets and a flurry of upbeat economic reports, finance ministers said they were cautiously optimistic about the state of the world economy.</p>
<h4>Market Matters</h4>
<p>Despite some last minute drama at <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/index.html" target="_blank">U.S. Supreme Court</a>, <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4090940" target="_blank">Chrysler LLC</a> </strong>closed on its deal with <strong>Fiat SpA (OTC ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AFIATY" target="_blank">FIATY</a>) </strong>and effectively moved beyond bankruptcy.  While Supreme Court Justice <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AFIATY" target="_blank">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</a> gave the would-be deal-breakers (Indiana pension funds) some false hope, the Supreme Court ultimately disallowed their objections and<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/10/chrysler-fiat/" target="_blank">let the transaction proceed</a>.</p>
<p><strong>General Motors Corp. (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AGMGMQ" target="_blank">GMGMQ</a>) </strong>announced the hiring of a former<strong>AT&amp;T</strong> <strong>Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AT" target="_blank">T</a>)</strong> exec to guide its rebirth and moved closer to selling its Saab unit as it “speeds” through its own restructuring.</p>
<p>In a “sign of financial repair,” the U.S. Treasury Department has granted its blessing to 10 major banks to repay $68 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) loans; <strong><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=jpm" target="_blank">JPMorgan Chase</a> &amp; Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJPM" target="_blank">JPM</a>)</strong> ($25 bln), <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=ms" target="_blank">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMS" target="_blank">MS</a><strong>)</strong>($10 bln), and <strong><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=axp" target="_blank">American Express</a>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AAXP" target="_blank">AXP</a>) </strong>($3.4 bln) expect to take the plunge in the next few days.</p>
<p>And in a sign of renewed economic strength, <strong>Texas Instruments Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATXN" target="_blank">TXN</a>)</strong> raised its outlook for the second quarter amid growing demand for semiconductors.  Meanwhile, <strong>Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC" target="_blank">BAC</a>) </strong>and U.S. Federal Reserve officials took a grilling from (grandstanding) politicos as the “he said/he said” controversy over the<strong>Merrill Lynch (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASAR" target="_blank">SAR</a>)</strong> acquisition continued.  The Obama administration ended its plan to limit compensation within financials and also is reevaluating prior proposals about consolidating regulatory bodies.</p>
<p>In transactional news, <strong>BlackRock Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABLK" target="_blank">BLK</a>) </strong>acquired ETF-giant<strong>Barclays Global Investors</strong> to form <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/blackrock-barclays/" target="_blank">the largest global asset manager</a>.</p>
<p>Energy prices continued the upward trek as an <a href="http://www.iea.org/" target="_blank">International Energy Agency</a> suggested that global demand for 2009 would be stronger than previously predicted.  On the supply side, a <strong>BP PLC</strong> <strong>(NYSE ADR: <a href="nyse:BP" target="_blank">BP</a>)</strong>report showed that global reserves fell in 2008, the first such decline in 10-years.  Crude surged past $72 a barrel for the first time this year as traders analyzed the supply/demand issues in conjunction with the ongoing prospects for an economic recovery.  Likewise, gas prices rose again (for 42 straight days) to above $2.60 per gallon nationally and consumers began to feel the pinch at the pumps as summer travel season arrives.  Inflation anyone?</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="444" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (03/31/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(06/05/09)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(06/12/09)</strong></td>
<td width="78" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">7,608.92</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,763.13<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,799.26</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+0.26%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,528.59</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,849.42<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,858.80</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+17.87%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">797.87</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">940.09<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">946.21</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+4.76%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">422.75</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">530.36<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">526.84</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+5.48%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1347.38</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,680.43<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,694.76</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+11.04%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.68%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.86%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.79%</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>155 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>Economically Speaking</h4>
<p>Economists are at it again.  With little substantive data on the calendar,<strong><em>The Wall Street Journal </em></strong>announced results of its latest forecasting survey and a majority of respondents expect the recession to end by late summer (though the subsequent recovery may not be as swift as many had hoped).  About half even believe the Fed will be inclined to raise the benchmark Federal Funds rate (from virtually 0% today) by the middle of 2010.  Despite the potential for an economic rebound, the labor market is expected to remain weak as unemployment is projected to climb just below 10% by the end of the year.</p>
<p>On the inflation front, the rapid rise in oil prices does not seem to be worrying most economists surveyed (or they simply have not been paying attention), as they pegged the price of crude at $72 a barrel by December 2010, very close to today’s level.</p>
<p>Retail sales rose in May for the first time in three months, though much of the increase reflected rising gasoline prices which is bad news for a consumer-driven economy. Discretionary spending seems to be going to the gas pumps rather than for household or luxury items.  Still, consumer sentiment is improving as the latest <strong>Reuters/University of Michigan confidence index</strong> rose to its highest level in nine months.</p>
<p>The trade deficit jumped for the second month in a row as oil imports climbed, also the result of higher crude prices.  Home foreclosures actually declined in May, a positive sign for housing, though its elevated level was still the third highest ever reported.  The Fed &#8220;<a href="http://www.investorwords.com/451/Beige_Book.html" target="_blank">Beige Book</a>&#8220; <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/report-predicts-recession-ending/" target="_blank">was released during the week and the messages were mixed</a>, at best.  While certain regions of the country have begun to experience resurgence in economic activity (or, at least, less contraction), others remained quite weak and ongoing challenges in the labor markets threaten to hinder any sustained recovery.  Despite the recent increase in interest rates, many Fed watchers do not expect the policymakers to commit to additional Treasury and mortgage-related securities purchases at the next open market committee meeting.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="271" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 10</td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Balance of Trade (04/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Deficit expanded for 2nd month in row</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Beige Book</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Economy remains weak with signs of recession easing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 11</td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Retail Sales (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Strong showing, but due to rising gas prices</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (06/06/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">19th straight week of record continuing claims</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 16</td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">PPI (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Housing Starts (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Industrial Production  (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 17</td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">CPI (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">.</td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (06/13/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Leading Eco. Indicators (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/15/g8-global-economy/">G8 Finance Chiefs Express Cautious Optimism About the State of the World Economy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/g8-finance-chiefs-express-cautious-optimism-about-the-state-of-the-world-economy/17890/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Share of the Debt, GM Dies, Silver Still a Buy, A Pivot Point and More!</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/your-share-of-the-debt-gm-dies-silver-still-a-buy-a-pivot-point-and-more/17405</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/your-share-of-the-debt-gm-dies-silver-still-a-buy-a-pivot-point-and-more/17405#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Mathias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Addison Wiggin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baby Boomers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dollar Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Mathias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weak Dollar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Brother, can you spare half a million? Your family’s (new and improved) share of U.S. debt&#8230; GM officially kaput… the dirty details and a brief rant, below&#8230; Markets hit a critical “pivot point,” says Rob Parenteau&#8230; The one number from China that’s boosting stocks, commodities and currencies today&#8230; Plus, two good reasons to buy a precious metal… especially silver</p>
<p> <strong>Your family’s share of the government debt is now over half a million dollars.</strong> A record $546,668, to be exact.</p>
<p>That cheery Monday stat comes courtesy of a USA Today study, which claims that each American family’s share rose 12% in 2008. That’s $55,000 in new government debt last year for every U.S. household &#8212; thousands more than the median household annual income. Here’s&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brother, can you spare half a million? Your family’s (new and improved) share of U.S. debt&#8230; GM officially kaput… the dirty details and a brief rant, below&#8230; Markets hit a critical “pivot point,” says Rob Parenteau&#8230; The one number from China that’s boosting stocks, commodities and currencies today&#8230; Plus, two good reasons to buy a precious metal… especially silver</p>
<p><img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z00_00.gif" alt="" /> <strong>Your family’s share of the government debt is now over half a million dollars.</strong> A record $546,668, to be exact.</p>
<p>That cheery Monday stat comes courtesy of a USA Today study, which claims that each American family’s share rose 12% in 2008. That’s $55,000 in new government debt last year for every U.S. household &#8212; thousands more than the median household annual income. Here’s how it breaks down:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/TheAmericanDream.2.jpg" alt="" width="469" height="387" /></p>
<p>Last year’s spike is the biggest since the Medicare prescription drug benefit was added in 2003. According to the rag, the government garnered $6.8 trillion in “new obligations” in 2008, bringing the total U.S. tab to $63.8 trillion. Given our spending record so far in 2009, it’s safe to say your family’s burden is already much, much larger.</p>
<p>And you ain’t seen nothin’ yet… the Social Security program will grow by 1-2 million beneficiaries every year until 2032 as baby boomers retire. Medicare will add just as many each year starting in 2011, when that same demographic starts turning 65.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z00_31.gif" alt="" /> <strong>Unless the U.S. becomes a net saver, “another global financial crisis triggered by a dollar crisis could be inevitable,”</strong> forecast former Chinese central banker Yu Yongding over the weekend. (Oy… Beijing is 7,000 miles from Washington, and even they can see this coming.)</p>
<p>Yu’s comments were purposefully timed &#8212; U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner embarked on a sudden PR tour of China this weekend. His mission? Keep the cash flowing from America’s No. 1 creditor.</p>
<p>“No one is going to be more concerned about future deficits than we are,” said Geithner, whose government’s budget deficit will exceed $1.75 trillion this year. &#8220;As we recover from this unprecedented crisis, we will cut our fiscal deficit [and] we will eliminate the extraordinary government support that we have put in place to overcome the crisis.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the meantime, Geithner assured students at Peking University that China’s investments in U.S. paper are “very safe.”<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z00_52.gif" alt="" /> <strong>“I doubt the Chinese believed him,” </strong>says the man, the myth, the legend Chuck Butler. “Of course, I&#8217;m not a Chinese official, so I don&#8217;t really know what they are thinking. But I’ve watched them smile and tell former U.S. Treasury Secretary Paulson that they were going to allow greater currency flexibility, and after he would board his plane, it would business as usual&#8230; Same thing for Graham and Schumer, who thought their prestigious status as lawmakers would get them someplace with the Chinese.</p>
<p>”It all comes down to the fact that the U.S. needs China more than the other way around.”<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z01_08.gif" alt="" /> <strong>General Motors, once the backbone of U.S. manufacturing, is officially bankrupt. </strong>As you’ve no doubt heard, the company declared bankruptcy this morning. But since it’s 2009, lord knows it can’t be a run-of-the-mill insolvency. The Obama administration has its hands deep in this thing… here’s the fine print of the biggest industrial bankruptcy in U.S. history:</p>
<ul>
<li>Uncle Sam gets a 60% stake. The government will pump an additional $30 billion into GM (on top of the $20 billion already squandered). In exchange, the government will be the largest shareholder… leverage it will use to usher GM through bankruptcy and convert it to this “leaner, stronger company” we’ve been promised</li>
<li>Half of the UAW’s $20 billion health care fund will be converted to GM stock, which will give it a 17.5% stake in the company. 12-20 factories will be closed, at the cost of approximately 21,000 union workers. 40% of the 6,000 GM dealers will have to close, too</li>
<li>The Canadian government gets a 12% stake, given all GM’s design/manufacturing activity up north.</li>
<li>Bondholders were bought (bullied?) out. They’ll swap their $27.1 billion in unsecured debt for 10% of GM, with warrants to own 15% more. Surely, they learned from Chrysler’s bondholders, who were publicly vilified by President Obama for demanding what was lawfully theirs… so much for that hallmark of American capitalism</li>
<li>Current shareholders get nada. At least that rule of bankruptcy is still intact. If you were long GM, please consider letting someone else manage your money. Anyone.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z01_46.gif" alt="" /> <strong> “GM Bankruptcy to Bring Taxpayer Ownership,” </strong>headlined Bloomberg this morning. Shame on them and the U.S. government for perpetuating this “taxpayer ownership” BS.</p>
<p>We must have been asleep when the “taxpayer” got any say in this one. GM is owned by wealthy politicians in Washington who, under threat of imprisonment, forced their constituents to finance the deal. Insinuating the public has any control is “Orwellian in the extreme” Addison suggested when we discussed the matter late Friday. Amen.</p>
<p>And let’s be really honest… taxes haven’t gone up to cover the GM bailout (or any credit crisis expense), but government borrowing certainly has. If any “taxpayers” truly own GM, their tax returns get mailed to Beijing or Tokyo.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z02_02.jpg" alt="" /> Sign of the times… <strong>GM and Citigroup are getting kicked off the Dow.</strong> Cisco and Travelers will replace them next Monday. Extra irony (and foreshadowing?) in this exchange, as Citi is the former owner of Travelers, which it spun off in 2002.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z02_11.gif" alt="" /> <strong> The market baked in GM’s insolvency a long time ago. </strong>In fact, the Dow’s off to the races this morning, even though one of its 30 components is rapidly approaching zero (the “beauty” of a weighted index). The big indexes rose 2% within the first 30 minutes of trading.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z02_15.gif" alt="" /> <strong> “We have reached a pivot point in financial markets,” </strong>forecasts Rob Parenteau, steward of the Richebacher Society.</p>
<p>“As we have documented in recent weeks, the list of U.S. macro series showing stable nominal levels over the past three-four months continues to increase. These include retail sales, new orders for durable goods and imports of materials and finished goods. That is not what usually happens in a debt-deflation dynamic, which cumulatively builds on itself. It appears the debt-deflation risk is being contained by extreme fiscal and monetary measures.</p>
<p>“Stability is better than free fall, but it is not the same as expansion, and we believe equity investors have shoved valuations high enough over the past three months that they now require signs of economic growth, not just stability, to carry equity indexes higher. We think the odds of them getting that could improve after we get past the auto production and dealer downshift later in the summer, but the rise in Treasury yields is becoming alarming.</p>
<p>“So from a strategic point of view, we believe equity investors want and need to see stronger economic and earnings results to drive indexes higher, while bond investors need just the opposite to calm Treasury yields down. In addition, through near-zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) and quantitative easing (QE) approaches, the Fed has been trying to push private investors into riskier asset classes while the Treasury&#8217;s debt issuance calendar implies they need private investors to prefer owning Treasury bonds, which are generally not the asset of choice in an economic recovery scenario.</p>
<p>“In other words, we have contradictory cross currents here. If the Fed doesn&#8217;t intervene to slow or halt the Treasury yield backup, there is a chance the stabilization in unit home sales will wither away. If the Fed does step up QE operations to halt the Treasury yield rise, professional investors taking the ‘green toilet paper’ view will continue to sell dollars and buy commodities. Down the line, that implies higher energy prices for consumers and higher input prices for manufacturers, neither of which we would consider growth-supportive developments.”</p>
<p>If you seek a better, richer life through macroeconomic awareness, you’ll be right at home in the Richebacher Society. Get in, <a href="https://www.web-purchases.com/RCH497ControlPromo/ERCHK477/landing.html">here</a>.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z03_02.gif" alt="" /> Like last week, <strong>materials and energy companies are leading the way today</strong>. The great global rebound argument is still hot, and this data point is keeping the commodity fire ablaze:<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z03_05.gif" alt="" /> <strong>China’s manufacturing sector expanded for the third month in a row in May</strong>, its government reports today. China’s purchasing managers index registered a score of 53.1 during the month, down just a bit from April but still above the expansion/contraction score of 50.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z03_14.gif" alt="" /> <strong>Oil’s up to a fresh seven-month high of $67 a barrel today</strong>, largely due to China’s PMI number.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z03_18.gif" alt="" /> <strong>The dollar is still falling,</strong> giving commodities an even bigger boost. The dollar index fell right through support at 80 on Friday and has plunged another point and a half since. It’s at 78.8 as we write, just off its 2009 low.</p>
<p>Thus, the cost of your European vacation has popped 7% since the start of May. The euro is up 9 cents over the last 30 days, to just under $1.42 as we write. The pound has followed suit, up 11 cents over the last month, to $1.62.</p>
<p>And could parity be around the corner for our neighbor to the north? The Canadian dollar is up to 92 cents today, its highest level since October 2008.<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z03_38.jpg" alt="" /> <strong>Gold continues to flourish, but silver has been the real precious metal story of late. </strong>The yellow metal is up about 9% over the last month, to roughly $980 today. Silver, on the other hand, shot up 29% in May, to $15.50 an ounce.</p>
<p>“In general,” says Byron King, “the precious metals are up because the big-spending politicians in Washington have no respect for the U.S. dollar. Break out the black crepe and armbands of mourning for the U.S. dollar.</p>
<p>“Specifically, silver has always been the &#8220;poor man&#8217;s gold.&#8221; Silver tends to lurk in the shadows of the price of gold, sort of a stepchild to the yellow metal.</p>
<p>“But on occasion, silver undergoes a slingshot effect. Between the basic industrial demand for electronics, plus jewelry demand (&#8217;cuz gold&#8217;s getting pricey!), and now the monetary pull&#8230; silver is accelerating in a price rise that is &#8212; believe it or not &#8212; leaving gold in the dust.</p>
<p>“Silver could break $20 sooner than we&#8217;ll see gold at $1,200, and the silver miners (my readers own several) will soar to new heights. Do you have your ticket for this ride? All aboard!!!”</p>
<p>Heh, get your ticket here: <a href="https://www.web-purchases.com/ESILaughedGold/EESIK605/landing.html">Byron’s latest special report on precious metals investing. </a><br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z04_00.gif" alt="" /> <strong>Silver may continue to outperform gold.</strong> If you’re a believer in historic ratios, silver still has room to rise in order to meet its average gold price ratio over the last decade.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/PreciousRatio.jpg" alt="" width="469" height="365" /></p>
<p>Either that, or gold’s price needs to fall. And in this environment, we’d sooner go long silver than short gold. Do you agree?<br />
<img src="http://www.ezimages.net/upload/5MIN/z04_16.jpg" alt="" /> <strong>“I&#8217;m a raving fan, but sometimes you guys get misled a bit,” </strong>writes a reader in response to <a href="http://www.agorafinancial.com/5min/end-of-the-recession-china-moly-declassified-treasury-ridiculousness-and-more/">Robert Gordon’s call</a> that the recession has bottomed.</p>
<p>“The so-called ‘ultimate indicator’ of recession ends of the four-week moving average of initial jobless claims is hardly as accurate as suggested. It is true that it does turn down typically, just as a recession ends from the retrospective declaration of that recession, but it is NOT true that every time the four-week moving average of initial jobless claims turns down during a recession, the recession ends.</p>
<p>“In the ’81-’82 recession, the indicator turned down from over 500k four times before a correct signal &#8212; in December ’81, February 82, May 82, June 82, and finally at the real ultimate peak in October 82. In the 1990 recession, it turned down in January of ’91, before its ultimate peak in April 1991.</p>
<p>“In the 2000 recession, it turned down in June 2001 from high levels, to give a false signal before peaking in October 2001, although many other recession indicators suggest that the recession went on for far longer than in the graphic you presented.</p>
<p>“Virtually every recession therefore has witnessed false signals of at least one and often many times before the ultimate peak in initial claims and before the later declared end of the recession. Why would this time be any different &#8212; particularly in view of the potential for auto mess to lead to accelerated claims?”</p>
<p><strong>The 5:</strong> We agree… guess we didn’t lay the skepticism on thick enough when <a href="http://www.agorafinancial.com/5min/end-of-the-recession-china-moly-declassified-treasury-ridiculousness-and-more/">we introduced the idea</a>. Glad to hear you’re a fan.</p>
<p>Source: <a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.agorafinancial.com/5min/your-share-of-the-debt-gm-dies-silver-still-a-buy-a-pivot-point-and-more/">Your Share of the Debt, GM Dies, Silver Still a Buy, A Pivot Point and More!</a></p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" /><!--Session data--><br />
<input id="jsProxy">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/your-share-of-the-debt-gm-dies-silver-still-a-buy-a-pivot-point-and-more/17405/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As GM Cruises Toward Government Deadline, U.S. Automakers Must Learn to Deal With a Permanently Smaller Market</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/as-gm-cruises-toward-government-deadline-us-automakers-must-learn-to-deal-with-a-permanently-smaller-market/17080</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/as-gm-cruises-toward-government-deadline-us-automakers-must-learn-to-deal-with-a-permanently-smaller-market/17080#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford Motor Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMAC LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>General Motors Corp.  (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gm" target="_blank">GM</a>) </strong>is closing in quickly on its June 1 deadline to finish overhauling its operations, or opt for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Because that deadline is actually one week from yesterday (Monday), analysts and investors will be watching GM closely this week.</p>
<p>No matter which path GM chooses – conventional restructuring  or bankruptcy – the U.S. Big Three of GM,<strong> Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=f" target="_blank">F</a>) </strong>and<strong> <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4090940" target="_blank">Chrysler LLC</a></strong> will have to adjust to the U.S. auto market’s post-financial-crisis “new reality.” Automakers will sell only 10 million cars and trucks in the U.S. market this year, the worst in at least 3 decades – and roughly 38% less than the 16 million vehicles that were sold in the United States annually in&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>General Motors Corp.  (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gm" target="_blank">GM</a>) </strong>is closing in quickly on its June 1 deadline to finish overhauling its operations, or opt for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Because that deadline is actually one week from yesterday (Monday), analysts and investors will be watching GM closely this week.</p>
<p>No matter which path GM chooses – conventional restructuring  or bankruptcy – the U.S. Big Three of GM,<strong> Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=f" target="_blank">F</a>) </strong>and<strong> <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4090940" target="_blank">Chrysler LLC</a></strong> will have to adjust to the U.S. auto market’s post-financial-crisis “new reality.” Automakers will sell only 10 million cars and trucks in the U.S. market this year, the worst in at least 3 decades – and roughly 38% less than the 16 million vehicles that were sold in the United States annually in recent years before the financial collapse caused an accompanying collapse in auto sales.</p>
<p>Part  of the reason for the slump in new vehicle sales is that consumers are  increasingly turning to used cars. <a href="http://editorial.autos.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=1057419" target="_blank">Pre-owned  car sales are up 10% this year</a> over last, as credit availability increases, but buyers focus on affordability. In fact, according to the most-recent report, used-car sales jumped in April, and the trend is expected to continue at least until the middle of the year as pent-up demand for affordable, pre-owned vehicles jacked up the used-vehicle segment of the auto marketplace.</p>
<h4>Market Matters</h4>
<p>U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner put his most optimistic face forward in assessing the progress with the bank bailout plan. Geithner pointed out that the 19 stressed-tested banks have already raised $56 billion in capital [including <strong>Bank of America Corp.’s (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>) </strong>$13.5 billion stock offering] and several could begin to pay back Trouble Asset Relief Program (TARP) money shortly.  He also indicated that the public-private partnership to remove “toxic” assets from banks’ books should be up and running in the next month-and-a-half, a move that may instill greater confidence in the financial markets.</p>
<p>However, an  analysis by <strong><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></strong> rained on Geithner’s parade by estimating that small and mid-sized banks could face losses on bad commercial real estate loans of $100 billion by year-end 2010. A <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a></em></strong> <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/04/01/commercial-real-estate-crisis/" target="_blank">investigation  of the looming commercial real estate crisis</a> predicted that this sector of  the real-estate market would pose major problems for the U.S. economic  recovery.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGMA" target="_blank">GMAC LLC</a></strong> may be close to receiving a fresh $7 billion in new (bailout) money as the government continues to seek ways to rescue the auto industry.  GM reached an agreement with its main union (UAW) that would reduce retiree benefits and overall labor costs to make them comparable to those of their foreign rivals.</p>
<p>As another negative earnings season comes to a close, investors searched long and hard for a bright spot – any bright spot.  With most <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500  Index</a></strong> companies reporting, earnings plunged more than 30% in the first quarter and are on track to fall 13% for the full year, the worst annual performance in six years.</p>
<p>Still, <strong>Thomson Reuters PLC (Nasdaq ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ATRIN" target="_blank">TRIN</a>)</strong> says that a consensus of sell-side analysts projects a 29% increase in earnings in 2010 as cost-cutting measures pay off and relative results begin to look more attractive.</p>
<p><strong>The Lowes Cos. Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=lowes" target="_blank">LOW</a>)</strong> reported  better-than-expected quarterly profits and raised its outlook for the year, but <strong>The Home Depot Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AHD" target="_blank">HD</a>) </strong>saw its numbers  disappoint investors who were looking for stronger signs from the home  improvement giant.  Likewise, <strong>Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AHPQ" target="_blank">HPQ</a>)</strong> reported weaker  earnings, and that spawned renewed pessimism for the high-tech sector.</p>
<p>On a brighter  note, retailers <strong>Sears Holdings Corp.  (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ASHLD" target="_blank">SHLD</a>)</strong> and <strong><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=ARO" target="_blank">Aeropostale</a></strong> <strong>Inc.  (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AARO" target="_blank">ARO</a>)</strong> reported better-than-expected quarterly profits.  Ratings upgrades brought early promise as <strong>Citigroup</strong> <strong>Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=c" target="_blank">C</a>)</strong> boosted  its forecast on homebuilder <strong>Lennar Corp.  (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ALEN" target="_blank">LEN</a>)</strong>; <strong>Deutsche Bank</strong> <strong>AG (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=db" target="_blank">DB</a>)</strong> raised  its views on <strong>McDonalds Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=mcd" target="_blank">MCD</a>)</strong>; and <strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gs" target="_blank">GS</a>)</strong> made Bank of America a “Buy.”  However, S&amp;P warned it may downgrade the United Kingdom’s debt below AAA due to ongoing economic obstacles, a development that prompted others to wonder if U.S. securities could face similar dire possibilities.</p>
<p>Crude oil surged past $62 a barrel on lower inventory data and gasoline climbed above $2.36 a gallon heading into the Memorial Day holiday weekend, a far cry from the $3.80 of this time last year – although it was 30 cents higher than late April levels.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="427" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (03/31/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(05/15/09)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(05/22/09)</strong></td>
<td width="65" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">7,608.92</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,268.64<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,277.32</p>
</td>
<td width="65" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-5.69%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,528.59</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,680.14<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,692.01</p>
</td>
<td width="65" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+7.29%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">797.87</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">882.88<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">887.00</p>
</td>
<td width="65" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-1.80%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">422.75</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">475.84<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">477.62</p>
</td>
<td width="65" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-4.37%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1347.38</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,564.63</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,604.53</p>
</td>
<td width="65" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+5.13%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="65" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.68%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.12%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.45%</p>
</td>
<td width="65" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+121 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>Economically Speaking</h4>
<p>While Geithner was “spinning” the bailout progress in the most favorable light possible, the U.S. Federal Reserve meeting minutes painted a picture of a more sluggish economy than most had predicted just three months ago.  In fact, the policymakers negatively revised their projections for economic contraction and warned that the unemployment rate could push toward 10% by the end of the year.  Still, central bank Chairman Ben S. Bernanke believes improvements are on the way as the impact of the Obama administration stimulus package aids in the recovery over the year’s second half. Furthermore, the Fed stands prepared to buy more U.S. Treasury and mortgage-related securities should such moves be deemed beneficial.</p>
<p>In the “it could be worse” category, Mexico (-21.5%), Japan (-15.2%), and Germany (-14.4%) each reported severe economic declines (as measured by gross domestic product, or GDP), as these three primary U.S. trading partners suffered the ill effects of the lower domestic demand for foreign-made goods and services.</p>
<p>Though the economic calendar was rather light during the week, some positive signs did emerge from deep within the numbers.  While <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/05/19/housing-starts-2/" target="_blank">analysts  were surprised by a decline in April housing starts</a>, the losses stemmed from a reduction in apartment activity, and single-family construction actually jumped by almost 3%, its second consecutive positive monthly showing.</p>
<p>Additionally, a private survey of the nation’s construction professionals depicted that homebuilder sentiment soared to its highest level in eight months, another sign that the prolonged housing slump may finally be nearing an end.</p>
<p>Finally, leading economic indicators, a predictive index that forecasts activity for the ensuing six months, turned positive after six straight down months.  Unfortunately, labor continued to struggle as the number of folks who have been receiving unemployment benefits for over a week hit a new record high.  While the economy definitely seems to be moving past the dreaded recession, any recovery will be limited as long as the labor picture remains weak and employees hold off on purchases until their job situations become more stable.  And the risk of a “double-dip” downturn remains somewhat high.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar </strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="322">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 19</td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Housing Starts (04/09)</td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Gains in single family offset    by declines in apartments</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 20</td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Policy Meeting Minutes</td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Signs of economic improvement    though slow recovery</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 21</td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (05/16/09)</td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Continuing claims still at    record highs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Leading Eco. Indicators (04/09)</td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Better than expected increased    in forecasting index</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 26</td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Confidence (05/09)</td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 27</td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Existing Homes Sales (04/09)</td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 28</td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Durable Goods Orders (04/09)</td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (05/23/09)</td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">New Home Sales (04/09)</td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 29</td>
<td width="91" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">GDP – Qtr 1 (revised)</td>
<td width="165" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<p><!--Session data--></p>
<input id="jsProxy">
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/05/26/general-motors-corp-3/">As GM Cruises Toward Government Deadline, U.S.  Automakers Must Learn to Deal With a Permanently Smaller Market</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/as-gm-cruises-toward-government-deadline-us-automakers-must-learn-to-deal-with-a-permanently-smaller-market/17080/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.889 seconds -->
