<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; US economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/us-economy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Energy, Brazil, Gold: What More Could You Want?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/energy-brazil-gold-what-more-could-you-want/20911</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/energy-brazil-gold-what-more-could-you-want/20911#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Byron King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Byron King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invest in Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invest in gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invest in oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invest in silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precious metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US oil reserves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Let’s take a quick look at what’s happening in Brazil, over and above the 2016 Olympics being awarded to Rio de Janeiro.</p>
<p>“I don’t know if I will live to see it,” said Brazil’s president Luiz (Lula) da Silva a couple weeks ago. “But Brazil has to transform itself into a big power in the 21st century. We have everything to make it happen. We are not talking about a little country here.”</p>
<p>No, indeed. Brazil is not “a little country” anymore. Any prudent investor has to consider how to hitch a ride on the Brazil growth story. Brazil is transforming into one of the world’s great powers in this century. It’s important to follow the news from Brazil. At the same&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let’s take a quick look at what’s happening in Brazil, over and above the 2016 Olympics being awarded to Rio de Janeiro.</p>
<p>“I don’t know if I will live to see it,” said Brazil’s president Luiz (Lula) da Silva a couple weeks ago. “But Brazil has to transform itself into a big power in the 21st century. We have everything to make it happen. We are not talking about a little country here.”</p>
<p>No, indeed. Brazil is not “a little country” anymore. Any prudent investor has to consider how to hitch a ride on the Brazil growth story. Brazil is transforming into one of the world’s great powers in this century. It’s important to follow the news from Brazil. At the same time, you have to know where to look, and how to read between the lines.</p>
<p>By official count — what the Brazilian government will confirm — the rocks of Brazil hold nearly 20 billion barrels of proven reserves. That number is on par with the total for U.S. oil reserves, including Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico.</p>
<p>It’s an impressive number, but then there’s also the unofficial Brazilian reserve count. How much oil is “really” down there under Brazilian jurisdiction? It depends with whom you talk. Some Brazilian officials will smile and say the country has 50 billion barrels of resources. If the Brazilians can tap into this treasure, it adds up to more than twice the total reserves of the U.S., including Alaska.</p>
<p>Other knowledgeable — VERY knowledgeable — Brazilians give much larger estimates. I’ve seen estimates that place the resource number at “over 100 billion barrels.” This puts Brazil in with the largest of the large oil nations, such as Iraq, Iran and Saudi Arabia.</p>
<p>These massive oil resources offshore Brazil lie beneath deep water and thick layers of salt. And since it’s all within Brazilian waters, the government of Brazil is increasing its control over offshore development. This way, Brazil will have its own oilmen keeping an eye out for the overall national interest — and making big money for the Brazilian treasury.</p>
<p>The new level of Brazil’s state control over oil development is a strategic decision. Brazil is counting on the hydrocarbon resources to help propel it forward as one of the world’s major powers. And the development in Brazil will control the destiny of a good number of players in the <em>OI</em> portfolio.</p>
<p>Many companies whose fate is tied to the wheel of the Brazilian ship of state are in that portfolio. All of them have operations that span the globe. They’re not a pure play on Brazilian energy development. Just the same, it’s nice to know that they’ll be pulling down a big chunk of business in one booming region over the next couple of decades. As I see it, these firms are long-term core holdings for any diversified energy portfolio.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Gold on the Move</strong></p>
<p>This week, the price of gold touched $1,040 per ounce. Silver also took the elevator to higher floors, to now over $17 per ounce. It’s been good news for all of the gold and silver miners in the <em>OI</em> portfolio.</p>
<p>We’re way up on many of the miners I’ve added this year to the <em>OI</em> portfolio. Some of the beaten-down guys are also showing us their inner Lazarus as precious metals prices soar.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>What’s with the Rising Tide?</strong></p>
<p>I just love it when the stocks in the <em>OI</em> portfolio are going up. It beats the heck out of what we experienced last October with the meltdown, that’s for sure. And it makes it easier to be the editor of a financial newsletter that focuses on precious metals, energy and other natural resources.</p>
<p>What’s going on? What’s with the rising tide? I believe we’re seeing some short covering in the precious metals arena. It has always amazed me in the past couple of years that there were people out there shorting gold. Huh? It’s like that scene from the movie The Deer Hunter in which Robert De Niro is playing Russian roulette with a pistol holding bullets in the chambers. You don’t have to be crazy to short gold, but it helps.</p>
<p>I may not have the same eyesight today as back when I flew Navy jets. But how close do you have to look to see that the U.S. dollar is in trouble? Yet people still want to bet on the dollar and against gold? Hey, it’s a free country. And I’ve spent the past few years feeling pretty lonely at times as I described my vision of monetary gloom and doom.</p>
<p>So now the dollar is dropping due to bad news on many fronts. The U.S. economy is NOT “recovering,” contrary to the propaganda from Washington. Unemployment is up, and it’ll stay up for a long time. There’s a structural readjustment going on within the U.S. economy, and it’ll take years (maybe decades) to play out. Meanwhile, U.S. tax policy, energy policy and the overall political process are a train wreck in living color. Can anyone explain to me how this has a happy ending?</p>
<p>The world, of course, is noticing. Now we read about a group of nations (the usual suspects, but add in modern allies Japan and France) trying to figure out how to ditch the dollar and use some other medium of exchange to trade oil. It’s not exactly a new rumor, but now it’s getting traction. And like people smelling smoke in a crowded theater, dollar holders are looking for the exit signs.</p>
<p>Is anyone surprised at this? How much fiscal and monetary abuse can the greenback stand? Hence, the precious metals prices are levitating.</p>
<p>We’ll probably see a pullback in precious metals prices, but that’s just going to be profit taking and the market working its magic. Long term, the metals are still going up.</p>
<p>It’s part of the long-term thesis of <em><a href="http://outstandinginvestments.agorafinancial.com/" target="_blank">Outstanding Investments</a></em>. Go with precious metals. Go with energy plays. Go with solid resource plays.</p>
<p>Until we meet again,<br />
Byron King</p>
<p><a href="http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/energy-brazil-gold-what-more-could-you-want/">Source: Energy, Brazil, Gold: What More Could You Want?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/energy-brazil-gold-what-more-could-you-want/20911/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Tips to Avoid Letting a Bad Stock Sucker-Punch You</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/two-tips-to-avoid-letting-a-bad-stock-sucker-punch-you/20915</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/two-tips-to-avoid-letting-a-bad-stock-sucker-punch-you/20915#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Louis Basenese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bear Stearns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countrywide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HGG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invest in gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMVFX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Basenese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAMUQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I confess… I got it wrong with gold.</p>
<p>Unlike some stockpickers and newsletter analysts, who proudly trumpet all their winners, while shuffling the losers under the rug, I have no problem admitting when my calls go against me.</p>
<p>And to the delight of all the naysayers, this happened just a couple of days ago when gold prices shot to a record high. That triggered my sell-stop and, rather than let my pride come before a fall and hang on, it’s time to move on.</p>
<p>Don’t get me wrong, though… I’m still convinced that the  yellow metal could suffer a correction for three main reasons…</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>So far, inflation hasn’t reared its ugly head. If it stays in hiding much longer, disillusioned investors will probably head&#8230;</li></ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confess… I got it wrong with gold.</p>
<p>Unlike some stockpickers and newsletter analysts, who proudly trumpet all their winners, while shuffling the losers under the rug, I have no problem admitting when my calls go against me.</p>
<p>And to the delight of all the naysayers, this happened just a couple of days ago when gold prices shot to a record high. That triggered my sell-stop and, rather than let my pride come before a fall and hang on, it’s time to move on.</p>
<p>Don’t get me wrong, though… I’m still convinced that the  yellow metal could suffer a correction for three main reasons…</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>So far, inflation hasn’t reared its ugly head. If it stays in hiding much longer, disillusioned investors will probably head for the exits.</li>
<li>If the U.S. economy recovers quicker than expected, investors will be inclined to abandon the safe haven of gold and reinvest in equities.</li>
<li>The technicals point to a drop. The last four times gold spiked near or above $1,000 per ounce, it quickly (and sometimes precipitously) corrected.</li>
</ul>
<p>However, giving into these convictions – and doubling down on gold – would mean abandoning two core investing disciplines that I swear by – position sizing and trailing-stops…</p>
<p><strong>Have You Considered Using Trailing Stops &amp; Position Sizing? </strong></p>
<p>I know… you’ve heard about them countless times before. But indulge me for a moment, as I explain an aspect of both trailing stops and <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2004/position-sizing-lessons.html" target="_blank">position sizing</a> that you’ve probably  never considered…</p>
<ul>
<li>When I speak at investment conferences, I always like to ask people to share their biggest loser. Heads go down and nary a hand rises.</li>
<li>Conversely, when I ask them to share their biggest winner, it’s like I just offered free candy to an auditorium full of kindergarteners. Everyone’s hand shoots up and there’s a chorus of anxious, “Oohs!”</li>
</ul>
<p>Nobody likes to talk about losing investments. Instead, we want to thump our chest over the latest 1,000% gainer. The reason for that is obvious, so let’s focus on the fear about talking about our losers.</p>
<p>Many investors turn their biggest loser into a total loss.  Instead of employing a <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2004/20041123.html" target="_blank">trailing-stop</a> and exiting a trade as the price tumbles, they make it a long-term investment to save face. Or worse, they invest more at lower prices. Most times, the stock goes belly up and they lose even more.</p>
<p>Even the professionals can’t claim immunity here.</p>
<ul>
<li>For instance, take Bill Miller, the famous manager of the Legg Mason Value Trust Fund (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=LMVFX">LMVFX</a>). Although Miller beat the S&amp;P 500 for 15 consecutive years, he refused to man up to his mistakes when the market took a nosedive in 2008. He kept averaging down in stocks like Countrywide, Bear Stearns, Freddie Mac (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Freddie+Mac">FRE</a>), Merrill Lynch, Washington Mutual (OTC:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Washington+Mutual">WAMUQ</a>) and <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=AIG">AIG</a>.</li>
<li>He revealed the true depth of his arrogance when he was asked how he knew when to stop buying a falling stock. “When we can no longer get a quote,” he replied. In other words, the only price at which he was unwilling to buy more was zero.</li>
</ul>
<p>Here’s my point…</p>
<p><strong>Avoid Losses With A Position Sizing &amp; Trailing Stop  Discipline </strong></p>
<p>When I joined <em>The  <a href="http://www.OxfordClub.com"  class="alinks_links">Oxford Club</a>, </em>I immediately stopped worrying about my losses. That’s because  we religiously adhere to a 25% <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/September/trailing-stop-discipline.html" target="_blank">trailing-stop discipline</a> and a position size of no more  than 4% in any one investment. Thus, losses are always contained.</p>
<p>The beauty of such a simple, disciplined approach is  two-fold…</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The results add up, decidedly on the plus side. Case in point: The independent <em>Hulbert Financial Digest</em> has ranked <em><a href="http://www.investmentu.com/latest-research/Oxford_Club_Membership.htm" target="_blank">The Oxford Club</a> </em>newsletter (<em>The</em> <em>Communiqué</em>) among the top five in the nation. That’s based on 10-year returns, too.</li>
<li>A trailing-stop and position sizing policy allow me to keep making bold calls without regret. The bolder they are, the smaller my position size.</li>
</ul>
<p>For instance, for my short gold call, I only invested 2%. For a hypothetical $100,000 portfolio, that means investing  $2,000 and losing $500, or less than 1% of the total portfolio value.</p>
<p>Bottom line: I don’t ever let an investment turn into an unacceptable loss. And I never put too many eggs in one basket. Sure I might lose 25% here or 25% there, but when I keep my position sizes small, in the grand scheme of things, it’s no big deal.</p>
<p>Such a strategy leaves me with plenty of capital to re-deploy and keep gunslinging. And while gold didn’t work out, some other contrarian bets are already making up for the loss and then some.</p>
<ul>
<li>Take <strong>Sotheby’s</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=BID" target="_blank">BID</a>), for example. Back  in June, I  advised readers to buy shares when everyone else believed <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/June/art-investing.html" target="_blank">the market for investing in fine art</a> was going into a long hibernation. The fundamentals faltered, but they didn’t collapse. As a result, Sotheby’s rallied 68% from my entry point.</li>
<li>Then there’s my recommendation last Thursday to buy  into the beleaguered <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/hhgregg-nyse-hgg.html" target="_blank">retail sector with <strong>hhgregg</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=HGG" target="_blank">HGG</a>).  It’s up 5.7% since then.</li>
</ul>
<p>If I take profits on both now, my misstep by shorting gold  doesn’t even matter.</p>
<p><strong>The Critical  Component to a Disciplined Investment Approach: Accountability</strong></p>
<p>But of course, a disciplined investment approach is useless without the critical component of accountability… In terms of position sizing, there’s only one person who can keep you honest: Yourself.</p>
<p>But when it comes to implementing trailing-stops, multiple  options exist…</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>A So-So Option:</strong> Enter the stop levels with your broker. However, this is not ideal. Market makers can manipulate prices to trigger these stops.</li>
<li><strong>A Better Option:</strong> Use a service like TradeStops (<a href="http://www.tradestops.com/" target="_blank">www.tradestops.com</a>). For a nominal annual  fee, it will alert you via text message and/or e-mail when your stocks hit  their trailing-stops.</li>
<li><strong>The Best Option:</strong> Excuse my bias, but the best value  for your money is <em>The Oxford Club.</em> We constantly remind you about position sizing and more importantly, notify you immediately when we hit a stop-loss or trailing-stop. And our members keep each other honest.</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition, membership also comes with a constant stream of high quality, profitable recommendations. And they make up for the occasional downer, like my short gold recommendation! To find out more, take a few minutes to <a href="http://www.oxfonline.com/OXF/evrgreen03092opt.html?pub=OXF&amp;code=WOXFKA01" target="_blank">read our report</a> on how it  all works.</p>
<p>Good investing,</p>
<p>Louis Basenese</p>
<p><a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/trailing-stops-and-position-sizing.html"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/October/trailing-stops-and-position-sizing.html">Source: Two Tips to Avoid Letting a Bad Stock Sucker-Punch You</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/two-tips-to-avoid-letting-a-bad-stock-sucker-punch-you/20915/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gold Touches a New Record</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/gold-touches-a-new-record/20901</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/gold-touches-a-new-record/20901#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invest in gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>“Gold continues to climb…stoked by inflation worries,” says a headline in the <em>International Herald Tribune</em>.</p>
<p>Yesterday, <strong>it touched a new record – $1,050</strong> – even as the dollar rose, oil slumped under $70 and stocks dipped very slightly.</p>
<p>Well, what do you expect? The United States added $1 trillion to its monetary base in the last year or so. The federal government is running a deficit of $1.7 trillion this year. And along comes Barack Obama with an idea to stimulate employment – spend more money! This time, Obama’s plan is a kind of ‘Cash for Workers’ program…in which businesses get a tax credit for hiring new employees.</p>
<p><strong>Gold investors must think the new program will be the straw they’ve been waiting for.</strong> Government has&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Gold continues to climb…stoked by inflation worries,” says a headline in the <em>International Herald Tribune</em>.</p>
<p>Yesterday, <strong>it touched a new record – $1,050</strong> – even as the dollar rose, oil slumped under $70 and stocks dipped very slightly.</p>
<p>Well, what do you expect? The United States added $1 trillion to its monetary base in the last year or so. The federal government is running a deficit of $1.7 trillion this year. And along comes Barack Obama with an idea to stimulate employment – spend more money! This time, Obama’s plan is a kind of ‘Cash for Workers’ program…in which businesses get a tax credit for hiring new employees.</p>
<p><strong>Gold investors must think the new program will be the straw they’ve been waiting for.</strong> Government has piled on bales of costly new initiatives on this poor camel’s back. Still, he stands up straight.</p>
<p>So, is gold at $1,000 a bargain…or a trap? Or both.</p>
<p>We begin by asking: where’s the inflation? We don’t see any inflation. What we do see is deflation.</p>
<p>Barclays Capital says gold could go to $1,500. We don’t know where they got that number. It could go to $15,000 for all we know. Or it could go down, too.</p>
<p>Our guess is that it will go down enough scare the bejesus out of speculators. Then, it will soar.</p>
<p>But, hey, we’re just guessing – along with everyone else.</p>
<p><strong>Sooner or later gold is probably headed to the lunatic moon.</strong> We’re sticking with the yellow metal. We don’t want to miss that ride.</p>
<p>But when?</p>
<p>Ah…we’re going to stick our necks out and say “eventually.” We’re sure we’re right about this. Just don’t ask us for more precision; we have none. And what bothers us is that between eventually and now there could be a lot of time and a lot of trouble. And one trouble that could come up pretty fast is another crash in the stock market.</p>
<p>If the stock markets of the world take another dive…like they did last year…gold will probably go down with them. Not as much, but down nonetheless. So, if we were speculating…we’d probably be short gold and short stocks too. We’d bet against bonds too – even though we think they will probably go up in the short run. The smart, long term money – in both stocks and bonds – is probably on the short side.</p>
<p>Here at <em>The <a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com"  class="alinks_links">Daily Reckoning</a></em>, however, we never speculate – except in print. As to ideas about how the world works we have plenty. We speculate daily. <strong>As to gold, stocks and commodities, we prefer to hold onto our long-term positions.</strong></p>
<p>What seems fairly sure to us is that this recovery is a fraud. It’s a mountebank and a flimflam.</p>
<p>And now approaches a moment of truth – earnings announcements. Stock market investors bid up shares on the theory that sales and profits would rise. Will they? We don’t think so.</p>
<p><strong>We think sales are going to be disappointing…and earnings will be even worse.</strong> If so, we’ll see analysts begin to change their expectations…and announce that the results are “not as bad as expected.”</p>
<p>If we get a few really bad announcements – with results much worse than expected – it could sink the rally. Then again, if we’re surprised with exceptionally good reports…it could send the market in the other direction.</p>
<p>Good results will also cause us here at <em>The Daily Reckoning</em> to question our position. Maybe the economy is not sinking into a chronic depression, after all. Could we be wrong?</p>
<p>Ha ha…are you kidding, dear reader? Of course, we can be wrong. When we were younger we were uncertain about things. But now that we’re older, we’re not so sure.</p>
<p>Here is what we’re pretty sure about:</p>
<p><strong>1) The credit cycle has topped out.</strong></p>
<p>Americans are saving – think of the poor boomers, 10 years older but not a penny richer than they were in 1999. Stocks have gone nowhere but down in real terms. Houses hit a high in 2006…now, they’re off 30%…and still going down. Jobs? Forget it…there are already 15 million people who are unemployed and about 200,000 more every month. The job market is unlikely to recover for another 6-13 years – that is, after many of the boomers are retired! And if you are lucky enough to have a job, you’re not likely to get a raise…not with so much spare capacity in the labor market.</p>
<p>Under those conditions, a consumer boom is very unlikely.</p>
<p><strong>2) We know that a period of credit contraction is deflationary.</strong></p>
<p>Prices go down as demand falls. Buyers disappear from the malls that once knew them, while the factories that produce stuff grow dusty and quiet.</p>
<p>But we know the feds hate falling prices. And we know they are taking extraordinary actions to get prices to go up. So far, their efforts have been a giant flop. Prices are falling in the United States at the fastest pace since the ’50s.</p>
<p>Most of the feds’ efforts have been directed towards keeping the bankers fat and happy…and getting themselves a bigger share of America’s output. They took funds designed to relaunch the US economy, for example, and used them to buy themselves a big position in the auto industry, the financial industry and the insurance industry.</p>
<p>3) We know too, by the way they conducted themselves in those affairs, that <strong>the feds have become much more aggressive…throwing their weight around in the private sector as never before.</strong></p>
<p>What we don’t know is how this affects markets in the short term. So far, consumer prices are falling, but the stock market is enjoying a bounce. It is a real, new bull market? Or just a bear market bounce? It is probably a bear market bounce…but it has been going for long enough that we have to at least consider the idea that it is a genuine bull market. That’s why the numbers from this quarter are important…they’ll tell us if the companies themselves are expanding earnings fast enough to justify investors’ optimism.</p>
<p><strong>4) We know too that there is a whole lot of ’flation going on.</strong></p>
<p>We are just unable to tell you what kind of ’flation it is. The monetary base is way up – it increased by $1 trillion in the last 12 months. But the money-in-circulation has barely budged. The feds give the banks overnight loans at practically zero interest. Then, the banks lend it back to the feds at nearly 4% more.</p>
<p>What happens to it then? Well, what do you think…it is wasted on typical federal government scams and humbugs.</p>
<p>So, relatively little of the money actually ends up in the consumer economy. And so, we can’t tell you whether the ’flation will have a ‘in’ prefix or a ‘de’ prefix. They’re just two letters. But they will make a whole alphabet of difference to the economy and to your investments.</p>
<p><strong>5) Most important, we are dead sure that the people running America’s financial policies are jackasses.</strong></p>
<p>We say that with all due respect, which is probably not much. They have only one idea – and it is a bad one. They think economies are improved by more consumer spending. They don’t seem to care why consumers occasionally cut back on their spending. All that matters to them is finding ways to get the consumer shopping again. So they try tax cuts and government spending…bailouts and boondoggles…zero interest lending and federal takeovers…cash for clunkers, cash for houses, cash for employees….</p>
<p>…trillions worth of claptrap and folderol. But what a nuisance! The fool consumer still won’t shop!</p>
<p>But they’re determined to keep trying. That’s why we can be pretty sure that, eventually, they’ll get inflation rates up. One way or another. And then, gold at $1000 will seem like an outrageous bargain.</p>
<p>Until tomorrow,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/bill-bonner/"  class="alinks_links">Bill Bonner</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/gold-touches-a-new-record/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/gold-touches-a-new-record/">Source: Gold Touches a New Record</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/gold-touches-a-new-record/20901/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We’re Back to Growth… For Now</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/we%e2%80%99re-back-to-growth%e2%80%a6-for-now/20881</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/we%e2%80%99re-back-to-growth%e2%80%a6-for-now/20881#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Mathias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Mathias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Parenteau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just one bit of meaningful economic data so far this week: The American service sector grew in September for the first time in a year. The Institute for Supply Management’s nonmanufacturing index scored 50.9 last month, just 9/10ths of a point above the growth/contraction tipping point. That certainly isn’t a booming service sector, but having contracted for the last 11 months… we’ll take it.</p>
<p>“The Chicago Fed’s national activity index,” notes our macro adviser and fellow data dork Rob Parenteau, “continues to point to a second-half 2009 real GDP recovery. With the September release, investors focused on the index — a composite of more than 80 monthly indicators that provides a reasonably good proxy for real GDP momentum — slipping to&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one bit of meaningful economic data so far this week: The American service sector grew in September for the first time in a year. The Institute for Supply Management’s nonmanufacturing index scored 50.9 last month, just 9/10ths of a point above the growth/contraction tipping point. That certainly isn’t a booming service sector, but having contracted for the last 11 months… we’ll take it.</p>
<p>“The Chicago Fed’s national activity index,” notes our macro adviser and fellow data dork Rob Parenteau, “continues to point to a second-half 2009 real GDP recovery. With the September release, investors focused on the index — a composite of more than 80 monthly indicators that provides a reasonably good proxy for real GDP momentum — slipping to -0.9 from -0.46 the month before. We have never seen this index climb consistently straight up after a recession month after month, and this decline is well within the range of monthly variation we tend to observe in this series.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img title="Chicago Fed's GDP Predictions" src="http://dailyreckoning.com/files/2009/10/DRUS10-07-09-2.GIF" alt="Chicago Fed's GDP Predictions" width="470" height="454" /></p>
<p>“To be sure, growth above the long-term real GDP trend is not signaled until this index crosses the zero threshold. Typically, it takes until year two of a recovery to get there. Right now, all we are shooting for is growth, rather than recession. As displayed below, year-over-year growth at a 1.5-2% real GDP pace is within reach by year-end, given the sharp V-shaped recovery in the Chicago Fed index to date. We believe this will be sufficient to bring actual inventory accumulation into view in Q1, which can carry the economy in to midyear 2010 or so, at which point the unwinding of the fiscal stimulus becomes more of an issue.</p>
<p>“We continue to believe that is much more of a second-half 2010 concern, when the fiscal tide starts to go out, revealing a U.S. private sector that will still be leery of adding to its existing debt and will still be very keen on keeping spending growth below income growth.”</p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/were-back-to-growth-for-now/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/were-back-to-growth-for-now/">Source: We’re Back to Growth… For Now</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/we%e2%80%99re-back-to-growth%e2%80%a6-for-now/20881/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Eternal Depression</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-eternal-depression/20875</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-eternal-depression/20875#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash for Clunkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US housing crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday was another exciting day on Wall Street. The Dow rose 131 points…and gold shot up $25 to a new record, $1043.</p>
<p><strong>Investors must be pondering the future.</strong></p>
<p>What will the future look like? No one knows. But investors thought they saw things they liked.</p>
<p>For one thing, there was the Federal Reserve governor from New York, who told the world that there was no risk of a rate hike anytime soon. Bill Dudley knows which way the wind is blowing. He said the Fed would hold money policy loose “indefinitely.”</p>
<p><strong>Indefinitely is otherwise known as “as long as it takes.”</strong></p>
<p>But as long as it takes for what? Ah…as long as it takes until the economy appears strong again.</p>
<p>How long will that be? Ah…maybe&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday was another exciting day on Wall Street. The Dow rose 131 points…and gold shot up $25 to a new record, $1043.</p>
<p><strong>Investors must be pondering the future.</strong></p>
<p>What will the future look like? No one knows. But investors thought they saw things they liked.</p>
<p>For one thing, there was the Federal Reserve governor from New York, who told the world that there was no risk of a rate hike anytime soon. Bill Dudley knows which way the wind is blowing. He said the Fed would hold money policy loose “indefinitely.”</p>
<p><strong>Indefinitely is otherwise known as “as long as it takes.”</strong></p>
<p>But as long as it takes for what? Ah…as long as it takes until the economy appears strong again.</p>
<p>How long will that be? Ah…maybe longer than anyone realizes.</p>
<p>Yesterday, we were calculating how long it would take to get the jobless number back down to ’90s levels…that is, around 5%. There are now about 131 million jobs in the United States…and about 15 million people who would like a job but can’t find one. Meanwhile, population growth adds about 1.5 million new workers every year. That means the economy has to grow at 1% (in real terms) just to stay even with population growth. Currently, the economy is going in the wrong direction – backwards. It’s losing jobs…maybe 3 million this year…and maybe another 2 million or so before it finally stabilizes (who knows?)…for a total of 20 million jobs down (about 13% unemployment) by the time unemployment bottoms out.</p>
<p>Let’s suppose, by some miracle, the economy turns around…and begins growing at 3% per year. That should be about 3 million new jobs per year. Half of those, remember, are just to keep up with population growth. So the other half – 1.5 million – gradually reduce unemployment. Now, let’s get out the calculator…20 million divided by 1.5 million equals a little more than 13. <strong>By these numbers you can expect full employment again in 2022!</strong></p>
<p>But what if the economy doesn’t grow at 3% per year? Ooooh…that’s the problem, isn’t it? All the feds – and practically all other economists too – are projecting a return to normal. They expect a ‘recovery.’ But what if there never is a recovery?</p>
<p>Heck, yesterday, the central bank of Australia said it was so sure that everything was going well it raised its key lending rate by 25 basis points.</p>
<p>“Canberra says risk of serious retraction over,” <em>The Financial Times</em> reports.</p>
<p>But they get a lot of sunshine down under. Possibly, the heads of the Reserve Bank of Australia got a little too much of it yesterday. Australia is also a supplier of natural resources to China; possibly, the sun burnt bankers failed to notice that China is a bubble.</p>
<p><strong>Or maybe they failed to notice that China’s biggest customer is broke.</strong></p>
<p>Right under <em>The Financial Times’</em> article about Australia is the following headline:</p>
<p>“No sign of credit revival for US households.”</p>
<p>“The latest data from the Federal Reserve show consumer credit declined at an annual rate of 10.4% in July – the fastest rate since the crisis began two years ago.”</p>
<p>Yes, dear reader, Americans are shedding debt. <strong>They are cutting back. They are saving.</strong></p>
<p>Another headline in <em>The Financial Times</em> tells us, “Holiday sales [are] set to fall.”</p>
<p>Hold on. Who makes all that junk that Americans buy for Christmas? <strong>And how can China buy more raw materials from Australia when it is selling fewer finished products to Americans?</strong></p>
<p>Perhaps China is focusing more sales on the domestic market; we don’t doubt it. But you don’t refocus the world’s second or third largest economy in 12 months. It takes years. And you don’t get this kind of rebirth without some kind of suffering. The big, old oak tree has to fall down before the sapling can take its place. And when the oak falls – it makes one helluva mess.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, President Obama is adding more gin to the party punch. He says he’s considering ways to create more jobs without a new stimulus program. Among the schemes under consideration is a $3,000 new job tax credit.</p>
<p>Hey, why not! <strong>They had such great success with the Clunker tax credit…and with the first time house buyer tax credit.</strong> Of course, when you pay people to do things, you can’t be too surprised that they do them. And then, you can’t be too surprised when they stop doing them after you stop paying them. Thus, when the Clunkers program conked out in August car buyers stopped buying. And when the new house purchase tax credit expires in November, don’t be surprised if house sales collapse too. So, if the feds are going to pay people to hire other people, they better be prepared to do it for a long time.</p>
<p>Which brings us back to our calculations. How long will it be before this economy can walk without the feds clutching both arms? A few months ago, we wondered how long it would take consumers to put their finances back in order. Five years? Ten years? There are so many assumptions required that the numbers barely make sense. Still, if you think the total debt burden is headed back to under 200% of GDP, where it was for most of the last century, that would require the elimination of debt equal to about 160% of GDP…or more than $20 trillion worth. How do you eliminate debt? Well, some of it simply disappears…through defaults, foreclosures and bankruptcies. The rest is paid off. How? By saving. Now, imagine that the United States could put an amount equal to 15% of GDP to work paying down its debts. That’s savings and capital formation of all types – corporate as well as individual. It ignores government, which is going in the other direction. At 15% of GDP per year, paying America’s private debt down to under 2 times annual output is still about a 7-year project.</p>
<p><strong>So, prepare for a long dry spell.</strong> In the best of cases, the American public has to stay on the frugality wagon for 7 to 13 years.</p>
<p>And in the worst of cases? Oh, well…that’s a different matter. The aforementioned US government is desperate to short-circuit the process of balance sheet repair. It is propping up the old tree every way it can. Thus, the whole period of adjustment may take much, much longer than it should. Instead of coming down with a crash, the limbs fall off one at a time. At this rate, the whole process could take nearly forever.</p>
<p><strong>As the private sector eliminates debt, for example, the feds add it.</strong> The deficits are scheduled – by the Congressional Budget Office – to be monstrous, but controllable. Cash for clunkers, cash for houses, cash for jobs – it adds up. But the CBO projections are based on very optimistic assumptions, in which the economy ‘recovers’ quickly and grows strongly. They do not take into account the real nature of the slump. It is not a pause…it is a permanent change. The Obama administration cannot, ultimately, prevent change. But it can slow down the process so much that the depression begins to seem eternal.</p>
<p>Until tomorrow,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/bill-bonner/"  class="alinks_links">Bill Bonner</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/the-eternal-depression/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/the-eternal-depression/">Source: The Eternal Depression</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-eternal-depression/20875/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lehman of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-lehman-of-2009/20859</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-lehman-of-2009/20859#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Mathias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Mathias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Bros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Naturally, at the focus of renewed market pessimism is a struggling financial: CIT Group. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=CIT+Group.">CIT</a>) The company — a hundred-year-old staple of small/medium business lending — is no stranger to walking the credit tightrope. They narrowly averted fiscal meltdown late last year with $2.3 billion in TARP bucks… then again in July by goosing bondholders with a $3 billion a debt-to-equity deal. Back then we joked, “Look for this crisis to repeat in a couple weeks.” We were wrong… it took a couple months.</p>
<p>So with some historic irony, one year and two weeks after <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:LEHMQ">Lehman Bros.</a> bit the dust, another debt-burdened, credit-reliant, potentially “too big to fail” institution is looking to either stick its bondholders with a raw deal or enter&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naturally, at the focus of renewed market pessimism is a struggling financial: CIT Group. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=CIT+Group.">CIT</a>) The company — a hundred-year-old staple of small/medium business lending — is no stranger to walking the credit tightrope. They narrowly averted fiscal meltdown late last year with $2.3 billion in TARP bucks… then again in July by goosing bondholders with a $3 billion a debt-to-equity deal. Back then we joked, “Look for this crisis to repeat in a couple weeks.” We were wrong… it took a couple months.</p>
<p>So with some historic irony, one year and two weeks after <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:LEHMQ">Lehman Bros.</a> bit the dust, another debt-burdened, credit-reliant, potentially “too big to fail” institution is looking to either stick its bondholders with a raw deal or enter sudden bankruptcy. We won’t pretend to know exactly how this one will end, but the market has certainly voiced its opinion:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="CIT Group Decline" src="http://dailyreckoning.com/files/2009/10/DRUS10-05-09-1.GIF" alt="CIT Group Decline" width="470" height="326" /></p>
<p>Heh, and of course, Goldman Sachs (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=GS">GS</a>) has a horse in this race. They stand to make about a billion bucks if CIT goes into bankruptcy — the fruits of a smartly designed loan agreement. Hank Paulson, despite his GS pedigree, didn’t make such a deal when he put $2.3 billion in TARP funds on the line… a CIT bankruptcy would mean a near-total loss of taxpayer bailout loans.</p>
<p>CIT is one of the biggest lending sources for small- and medium-size business in America… what happens to this recovery when this well runs dry?</p>
<p>With or without CIT, “The real job creators in the U.S. economy, small businesses, will not expand hiring as expected,” forecasts Dan Amoss. “There are many reasons for subdued hiring plans; an emerging reason to avoid expansion and hiring will be heightened expectations that tax rates will soar in the future to pay for out-of-control government spending.</p>
<p>“So I expect over the next several months, mainstream pundits and forecasters will start worrying about tepid hiring, even as the pace of job losses slows. As we ‘lap’ the 2009 corporate cost cutting by early 2010, and top lines fail to rebound, earnings estimates will have to come back down. I’m amazed at how many sell-side analysts are modeling V-shaped recoveries in 2010 earnings. Most stock prices are disconnected from reality…</p>
<p>“The labor market is dealing with a structural imbalance fueled by government-sponsored housing and credit bubbles. Many will call for the government to ‘solve’ this labor market problem, which will cause a new type of market dislocation. By early 2010, some will push for the federal government to start hiring the chronically unemployed in ‘New Deal’ types of programs.”</p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/the-lehman-of-2009/">Source: The Lehman of 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-lehman-of-2009/20859/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Bull in a Silver Shop</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-bull-in-a-silver-shop-2/20852</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-bull-in-a-silver-shop-2/20852#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Daughty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout Package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invest in gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invest in silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Daughty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the most interesting news items I’ve found was on the cover of <em>The Financial Times</em>, where I learned that a guy named Lahde “made tens of millions of dollars from betting against the financial and property sectors during [the] past two years”, and he now wanted to thank “the low hanging fruit, i.e. idiots whose parents paid for prep school, Yale, and then the Harvard MBA” who made it all possible for him to find enough suckers.</p>
<p>He noted that <strong>“These people who were often truly not worthy of the education they received (or supposedly received) rose to the top of companies such as </strong><strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=AIG">AIG</a></strong><strong>, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and all levels of our government.</strong> All of this behavior supporting the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most interesting news items I’ve found was on the cover of <em>The Financial Times</em>, where I learned that a guy named Lahde “made tens of millions of dollars from betting against the financial and property sectors during [the] past two years”, and he now wanted to thank “the low hanging fruit, i.e. idiots whose parents paid for prep school, Yale, and then the Harvard MBA” who made it all possible for him to find enough suckers.</p>
<p>He noted that <strong>“These people who were often truly not worthy of the education they received (or supposedly received) rose to the top of companies such as </strong><strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=AIG">AIG</a></strong><strong>, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and all levels of our government.</strong> All of this behavior supporting the aristocracy,” he says, “only ended up making it easier for me to find people stupid enough to take the other side of my trades. God bless America.”</p>
<p>This goes along with an article in the <em>St. Petersburg Times</em> about Tom James, chairman and chief executive of Raymond, James Financial, who had <strong>“some tough words for the wizards of Washington, DC who oversaw the $700-billion bailout package”.</strong></p>
<p>He reports, “The Brave And Wonderful Mogambo (BAWM) was right all along! Those government weenies are the biggest freaking morons you ever saw, and we as a country should be ashamed of ourselves for having elected such corrupt, half-witted, utter failures and congenital idiots!”</p>
<p>As you have probably guessed by now, he did not say those exact words, but he implied every syllable when he said, <strong>“Legislators were almost embarrassingly ignorant of how the financial system works”</strong>, which I figure explains how they don’t understand the linkage between their own Bad, Bad Performance (BBP) as legislators and the subsequent Bad, Bad Performance (BBP) of the economy, and he says that only 3 of 16 legislators that he talked to actually understood what was going on in the “credit crisis.” Less than 20%! Hahaha! We’re doomed!</p>
<p>Well, maybe these Congressional losers will understand the unfolding economic slowdown, as evidenced by the Baltic Dry Index, which is an index of the cost to transport stuff by cargo ship, and which has fallen precipitously, which seems very important to me, and to Junior Mogambo Ranger (JMR) Riccardo, too, who is also alarmed by this like – as I previously said – me.</p>
<p>It’s actually beyond scary, in a terrifying kind of “ain’t nobody buying nothing in a consumer economy” kind of way, which means that without the consumer buying stuff as his or her contribution to the famous statistic of “the consumer is 70% of the economy”, we are, in case you ain’t heard, freaking doomed!</p>
<p>Well, maybe not all buying is drying up, as silver market analyst, Ted Butler, reports that in the last 10 months, <strong>“some 150 million ounces of silver can easily be documented to have been bought by investors. Undocumented purchases would add tens of millions more ounces.”</strong></p>
<p>In fact, when you add it all up, “Investment demand for silver this year is running at a full 25% of world mine production and over 20% of total production (including recycling). This is a remarkable historical turnabout.”</p>
<p>Thus, it is easy to see why Mr. Butler is “bullish beyond belief for silver”, since this kind of demand means that “In silver, the documented 150 million ounces bought in the first ten months of this year is equal to 15% of all the silver bullion equivalent thought to exist!” Wow!</p>
<p>More than one-seventh of all the silver bullion “thought to exist” in the whole world was suddenly bought up in less than a year, and yet the price of silver has been pounded down to less than 10 bucks an ounce? No wonder I am so bullish on silver!</p>
<p><strong>He also notes that the gold/silver ratio is at more than 80, which is “one of the biggest differences in history.”</strong></p>
<p>And not only that, but since there are 4 to 5 billion ounces of gold in the world versus only 1 billion ounces of silver, that means that “the total dollar value of all the gold in the world is worth 300 to 400 times more than all the silver in the world (80 times 4 or 5)”.</p>
<p>Talk about undervalued! Hey! This investing stuff is easy! Whee!</p>
<p>Until next time,</p>
<p>The Mogambo Guru</p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/a-bull-in-a-silver-shop/">Source: A Bull in a Silver Shop</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-bull-in-a-silver-shop-2/20852/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to Zombieland</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/welcome-to-zombieland/20850</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/welcome-to-zombieland/20850#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bonner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflated prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invest in gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to Zombieland…where the most amazing things happen…Starring Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner and a cast of millions…</em></p>
<p>The new movie – <em>Zombieland</em> – about a group of survivors in a world of zombies, was the biggest grossing film in America and Canada over the weekend. It must reflect the zeitgeist of the North American public…<strong>a deep feeling that we are living in a decaying world.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Maybe it comes from the growing awareness that the old bubble economy of the 2002-2007 period is dead. Now, survivors must defend themselves from the zombies.</p>
<p>Survivors are being attacked in the streets, in their homes, and at their workplaces. Zombie banks – kept alive by artificial stimulants provided by the feds – take their money and their houses. Living-dead&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to Zombieland…where the most amazing things happen…Starring Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner and a cast of millions…</em></p>
<p>The new movie – <em>Zombieland</em> – about a group of survivors in a world of zombies, was the biggest grossing film in America and Canada over the weekend. It must reflect the zeitgeist of the North American public…<strong>a deep feeling that we are living in a decaying world.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Maybe it comes from the growing awareness that the old bubble economy of the 2002-2007 period is dead. Now, survivors must defend themselves from the zombies.</p>
<p>Survivors are being attacked in the streets, in their homes, and at their workplaces. Zombie banks – kept alive by artificial stimulants provided by the feds – take their money and their houses. Living-dead companies block new competitors. <strong>And the zombies at the Fed and the Treasury department try to gnaw on their savings</strong>, encouraging inflation to eat away the purchasing power of the dollar.</p>
<p>As to this last point, the feds have gotten nowhere. They wear down their teeth for nothing. Prices are going down, not up. Houses are 30% cheaper than they were in 2006. Hotel rooms are 20% cheaper than last year. You want a luxury room? Just ask for an upgrade. Chances are good that no one is renting the luxury suites. Just make them an offer. Discounts are available almost everywhere. The Sony Playstation, for example, is now available – 25% off.</p>
<p>Stocks are cheaper too. They’ve been going up for the last seven months, but they’re still about a third less than they were in 2007.</p>
<p>Stocks fell again on Friday. Investors began to fret that maybe…just maybe…the authorities don’t have this zombie problem under control.</p>
<p><strong>“Jobs news gets worse,”</strong> <em>The New York Times</em> tells us.</p>
<p>Since the stock market began going back up in March, the United States has lost 2.5 million jobs. It has lost jobs every month since December 2007. Now, unemployment – officially at one in ten workers – is the worst it has been in 26 years.</p>
<p><strong>What kind of recovery is this? We don’t know, but if it continues much longer we’ll all be unemployed.</strong></p>
<p>But not to worry, dear reader. Secretary of the Treasury Tim Geithner says the signs of recovery are “stronger” than expected.</p>
<p>We wonder what signs he’s looking at. Of course, this is the same doctor who was on the scene at the New York Fed when strange things began happening. The financial industry started acting funny in the bubble years…spending money like there was no tomorrow. And then, wouldn’t you know it, there wasn’t any tomorrow. They dropped dead in the crash of ’07-’08. But with huge injections from the Fed, they’ve turned into Zombies.</p>
<p>Of course, Tim Geithner missed the whole thing. So maybe he’s not the best source of recovery sightings.</p>
<p>A survey by Business Roundtable tells us that <strong>the ranks of the unemployed are likely to swell.</strong> Only 13% of employers have plans to hire more workers. The rest are either sitting tight…or turning workers loose.</p>
<p>Naturally, of all those people cut off from paychecks, more than a few are looking a little peaked. Their eyes sink back in their heads. Their skin turns grey. Soon, they’re starving for raw meat.</p>
<p>“Personal bankruptcies soar,” says <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>.</p>
<p>And not surprisingly, when they become desperate, they tend to default on their mortgages. We know already that auto sales drove off a cliff when the summertime ‘Cash for Clunkers’ program came to an end. Now, summer’s over. Housing sales should decline too – forcing more homeowners into default and foreclosure.</p>
<p>The zombies are having a depressing effect everywhere. The stock market went down again on Friday…the Dow fell 21 points. The oil market didn’t do much better, with the price of the black good still below $70.</p>
<p><strong>As for gold, the yellow metal continues to hold above $1,000.</strong> It fell below $1,0 00 for just a couple days. On Friday, it was back to $1,004.</p>
<p>The $1,000 level used to be a ceiling for the gold price. Now it seems like a floor. Are the Chinese buying below $1,000? Maybe. Do we have a Beijing put option available to us? That is, has the risk been taken out of the gold market by China’s desire to stock its vault with something other than dollars? It is an intriguing thought. We don’t know the answer.</p>
<p>We are holding onto our gold. It’s insurance – protection against the feds. If they do something really stupid, the price of gold will soar. If they don’t do anything really stupid, well, we’ll be surprised. After all, they’ve already turned America into Zombieland.</p>
<p><strong>On our last visit to the French countryside, in Normandy, we noticed a big pile of hay beside the road, with a sign on it: “Free Milk”</strong></p>
<p>Another pile of hay had another message: “Farmers On Strike.”</p>
<p>The story behind these signs has a depression-era, black and white, look to it. Newsreels from the Great Depression show US farmers dumping milk rather than sell it at deflated prices. Now, French farmers do the same. Prices have fallen so low that many refuse to sell it at all.</p>
<p>But they can’t stop milking the cows. So what do they do with the milk? They give it away. Or, in a few instances, they throw it at the government’s farm agency offices.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, a story in <em>The New York Times</em> explains one of the reasons why milk has become so cheap. New technology makes it easier and cheaper to produce good milk cows.</p>
<p><strong>Technology and globalization are inherently deflationary.</strong> The former increases productivity, thus lowering the cost of output. The latter lowers prices by directing business to the world’s lowest-cost producers.</p>
<p>Deflation is the natural order of things. Inflation is always an artifice caused by government. Central banks ‘target’ a certain level of inflation because they think – or say they think – that a bit of inflation helps create full employment. And it does, sometimes. But it does it by treachery. Inflation hoodwinks the working class. It reduces their real wages, making them cheaper to employ. Then, the proles wise up. They realize that prices are rising. They demand more wage increases. That is when inflation begins to get out of control and presidents get out the ‘Whip Inflation Now’ buttons.</p>
<p><strong>Every time government offers to solve a problem, it inevitably makes the problem worse</strong> – except, occasionally, in rare episodes when a government-organized national defense pays off.</p>
<p>Two interesting news items in the British press, one inspiring…one pathetic.</p>
<p><strong>The first concerns how to fight terrorism…and win!</strong> Terrorists use the local population in Northwest Pakistan like the New Jersey militia used the local population of Pennsylvania when it was putting down the Whisky Rebellion. That is, they barge into houses and demand food and lodging.</p>
<p>One brave man said ‘no.’</p>
<p>The terrorists were giving him a good thrashing when his daughter took the initiative. She hit one with an axe, took is AK47, and shot him dead. The other two fled.</p>
<p><strong>Once again, we see how private initiative – at negligible cost – can succeed where trillion-dollar government boondoggles fail.</strong> Why make a federal case out of it? Got a problem with a terrorist? Whack him!</p>
<p>The other story was front-page fodder for the <em>Telegraph</em> last week. It illustrated the real problem with suicidal people – they think only of themselves.</p>
<p>A young woman was depressed because she couldn’t have children. She decided to kill herself. She drank poison…and then called the ambulance. At the hospital, she was still conscious and told doctors that under UK legislation she had a “right to die.” <strong>The doctors were forbidden from treating her. She died.</strong></p>
<p>Naturally, her parents were upset. Hadn’t the doctors taken an oath? Weren’t they morally bound to intervene, no matter what the law said? She made them all complicit in a homicide. A more considerate person would have stayed home.</p>
<p>Until tomorrow,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/bill-bonner/"  class="alinks_links">Bill Bonner</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/welcome-to-zombieland/">Source: Welcome to Zombieland</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/welcome-to-zombieland/20850/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Jobs Jamboree Friday!</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-jobs-jamboree-friday-7/20844</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-jobs-jamboree-friday-7/20844#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Butler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[US Dollar & Forex Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British pound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Loonie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars for Clunkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss Franc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> The dollar remains well bid&#8230;G-7 to hand currencies off to G-20? Car Sales collapse&#8230;Auditing the Lehman cash movements&#8230;And Now&#8230; Today&#8217;s Pfennig!</p>
<p>Good day&#8230; And a Happy Friday to one and all! Yesterday, I welcomed you to October. I had been prepared to tell you about a famous radio station here in St. Louis, that has long called October&#8230; Rocktober&#8230; But forgot, as usual! But anyway&#8230; It&#8217;s the first Fantastico Friday of Rocktober!</p>
<p>Today is a Jobs Jamboree Friday too! And&#8230; I&#8217;m not getting a good feeling about today&#8217;s labor report at the Jobs Jamboree. The forecast is for jobs losses to fall from -216,000 to -175,000, but the unemployment rate to tick up to 9.8% from 9.7%&#8230; I got the feeling, baby,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The dollar remains well bid&#8230;G-7 to hand currencies off to G-20? Car Sales collapse&#8230;Auditing the Lehman cash movements&#8230;And Now&#8230; Today&#8217;s Pfennig!</p>
<p>Good day&#8230; And a Happy Friday to one and all! Yesterday, I welcomed you to October. I had been prepared to tell you about a famous radio station here in St. Louis, that has long called October&#8230; Rocktober&#8230; But forgot, as usual! But anyway&#8230; It&#8217;s the first Fantastico Friday of Rocktober!</p>
<p>Today is a Jobs Jamboree Friday too! And&#8230; I&#8217;m not getting a good feeling about today&#8217;s labor report at the Jobs Jamboree. The forecast is for jobs losses to fall from -216,000 to -175,000, but the unemployment rate to tick up to 9.8% from 9.7%&#8230; I got the feeling, baby, baby, I got the feeling&#8230; Oops, a little James Brown on Fantastico Friday never hurts! But what I was saying was I&#8217;m getting the feeling that there are risks to this forecast&#8230; And that the job losses could come in higher, which would really be a BAD thing for the recovery flag wavers and risk takers, I&#8217;m sorry to say&#8230;</p>
<p>You see, the recovery flag wavers and risk takers are wishing, and hoping, and thinking and praying that the data in the U.S. continues to show some sign of life. Any signs that the U.S. economy could be slipping backwards, would deep six stocks for sure, and if last year&#8217;s trading tells us anything, it would have an adverse affect on Commodities and Currencies too!</p>
<p>So&#8230; This is a BIGGIE, today, folks&#8230; So strap yourself in, and make sure you keep your arms and legs inside at all times during the ride!</p>
<p>Yesterday&#8217;s currency trading left a lot to be desired&#8230; There was little movement from the overnight sessions which tomahawked the non-dollar currencies. That&#8217;s a good thing&#8230; But the downside risk today is just too much for me right now&#8230; Maybe after 7:30 CT I&#8217;ll be able to breathe again, for that&#8217;s when the Jobs Jamboree prints&#8230; Again, Japanese yen enjoys the sun from both sides of their house&#8230; When the dollar is weak, yen rallies with the other non-dollar currencies&#8230; When the dollar is strong, yen rallies alongside the dollar! It&#8217;s good to be the yen! (that is before the Ministry of Finance in Japan begins to intervene!)</p>
<p>Hey! Remember when I bashed the Cars for Clunkers scheme, I mean program, and exposed it for what it was, and what it would do to future sales of automobiles? Well, as they say&#8230; The proof is in the pudding!</p>
<p>Yesterday, it was reported that General Motors (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:GRM">GRM</a>) had posted a 45% drop in September U.S. light-vehicle sales, while Chrysler&#8217;s sales fell 42%. Ford saw a much more modest drop of 5.1%. Among Japanese auto makers, Toyota said its September U.S. sales declined 16% from a year earlier, while Nissan saw its results fall 7% and Honda said its sales slid 23%. The auto industry was hurt by the expiration of the U.S. government&#8217;s &#8220;cash-for-clunkers&#8221; rebate program.</p>
<p>Yes&#8230; I told you this would happen&#8230; I also think that any Gov&#8217;t program to prop up the economy is just falling into the ghost of Japan&#8217;s hands&#8230; I&#8217;ve explained this before, about how when Japan experienced a HUGE market correction after their go-go 80&#8217;s, they panicked and began throwing money at the problem, instead of just letting the markets run their course&#8230; The Japanese introduced stimulus package after stimulus package, and Gov&#8217;t program after Gov&#8217;t program, like Quantitative Easing&#8230; And look how well that&#8217;s worked out for them!</p>
<p>So the ghost of Japanese recoveries that never panned out, is haunting the U.S. Gov&#8217;t now!</p>
<p>Today is also the start of a G-7 meeting in Istanbul&#8230; Istanbul was once Constantinople! Or so the song goes&#8230; Any way&#8230; The rumors coming out of the pre-meeting stuff is that G-7 will no longer make a statement or issue a communiqué&#8217; regarding currencies, as they now feel that the only group that should have that responsibility is the G-20, which last week took the world economies watchdog title from G-8&#8230;</p>
<p>Currency traders have long used these G-7 communiqué statements as a tool that indicates direction for currencies&#8230; And while that has actually come to fruition a handful of times over the years, for the most part, G-7 was nothing but a boondoggle!</p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s out there that you won&#8217;t see a lot of people talking about is the vote going on in Ireland today, on the Lisbon Treaty, which the Irish people voted down last year&#8230; This Lisbon Treaty changes the way the European Union works, and would amend the Maastricht Treaty&#8230; It was intended that all member European Union states would ratify this before now&#8230; So, this vote is like the Sword of Damocles hanging over the euro for Monday morning&#8230;</p>
<p>You see, the vote will be taken today, counted tomorrow, and announced Sunday, which will cause a knee-jerk reaction to the euro trading on Monday&#8230; Right now, the polls show the Treaty will be accepted this time by the Irish. If passed, it goes to Poland and the Czech Republic, and if they vote yes then it would lead to ratification, which would be a good thing for the euro&#8230; A no vote would be bad thing, just like it was in June of 2008, when Ireland voted no the first time around.</p>
<p>Yesterday, the IMF issued a report on Currency Composition of Global FX Reserves&#8230; And this is quite telling I believe, for the report showed a continued diversification away from the dollar, in the 2nd QTR of this year&#8230; I had to laugh last year, when I was on the FXU Currency Tours, and one of the guys there said that the fall of currency reserves allocation of dollars from over 80% to 64%, was nothing but currency appreciation by the euro&#8230; I would point to the these IMF reports, when I talked so that I didn&#8217;t make a big thing out of it&#8230;</p>
<p>Did you see the story in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) regarding Lehman Brothers? This story has conspiracy stamped all over it, so you know me, I was all over this story like a cheap suit! Here&#8217;s the gist of the story from the WSJ&#8230; &#8220;An examiner is looking into how the Federal Reserve was promptly repaid billions of dollars in cash and securities it lent to Lehman Brothers before the bank filed for bankruptcy, while other creditors are still owed money. The court appointed Anton Valukas, chairman of Jenner &amp; Block and a former U.S. attorney, to explore whether the Fed received improper preferential treatment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Chuck again&#8230; Now, you, me and the lamppost all know what went on here, just by that description in the WSJ&#8230; But, we&#8217;ll wait for the report, I guess&#8230;</p>
<p>The U.S. stocks really got taken to the woodshed at the close yesterday, and the futures in the overnight markets are weak&#8230; So&#8230; Guess where the money goes when they sell stocks? That&#8217;s right, U.S. Treasuries&#8230; So, just about the time you think that the mom and pop&#8217;s of the world that went to Treasuries last year in the so-called Flight to Safety, had taken on enough losses, and were going to get out&#8230; Here comes the stock correction that I&#8217;ve been talking about&#8230; Or maybe not&#8230; Maybe this is just a couple of days of selling&#8230; Or maybe it is the correction&#8230;</p>
<p>So, if dollars are flowing into Treasuries, the yields of those Treasuries are going down once again&#8230; UGH! This just doesn&#8217;t make any sense to me! Didn&#8217;t these people that went to the so-called Safety of Treasuries last year, but lost money, learn anything? Or did enough time pass and they&#8217;ve &#8220;forgotten the pain&#8221;?</p>
<p>Oh Heck! This just feeds more air into the Treasury Bubble&#8230; Which means that it grows larger and larger, and also means that when it does POP, the losses will be severe and all across the board&#8230; I mean, isn&#8217;t that what we&#8217;ve learned about what happens when a bubble POPS in the past?</p>
<p>Yesterday, the data cupboard was busy&#8230; We had the Weekly Initial Jobless Claims post a higher number than was expected, coming at 551,000, VS last week&#8217;s 534,000&#8230; I always love it when the Jobs Jamboree follows a Weekly Initial Jobless Claims repot&#8230; Because&#8230; The Weekly report shows that, in this case, that 551,000 jobs were potentially lost last week, and today&#8217;s monthly report by the BLS will show something far less&#8230;</p>
<p>We also saw that the U.S. Consumer continues to spend more than they make, as Personal Spending was up 1.3%, while Personal Income was only up .2%&#8230;</p>
<p>And then finally we saw the U.S. ISM Index (manufacturing) come in weaker than expected, but remain above 50, at 52.6&#8230; That&#8217;s a weaker number than the August figure which was 52.9&#8230; And I would think that someone would have noticed this&#8230; But we had the TV on all day, and I had it one when I got home, and never saw mention of this anywhere!</p>
<p>And then there was this&#8230; Colleague, Aaron Stevenson, called me yesterday morning, trying to beat the deadline for stuff to add to the Pfennig&#8230; He missed&#8230; So I have it for today&#8230; Remember yesterday morning, when I announced that BOA CEO Ken Lewis was retiring, and that I thought that to be strange?</p>
<p>Well, Aaron was all over this, telling me that he worked for BOA for a number of years, and sat in on meetings with Ken Lewis, and that Ken Lewis was not the kind of person to take &#8220;early retirement&#8221;&#8230; In fact, Aaron says, &#8220;that 4 months ago, I heard an interview with Ken Lewis, and he said I&#8217;m 62, I&#8217;m not ready to retire.&#8221; Aaron said that he was a &#8220;no surrender, no quit, kind of guy.&#8221; Hmmm&#8230; I wonder what changed in 4 months? Well, Aaron thinks, and I agree, that he was forced out by the Feds, for speaking his mind on the BOA / Merrill Lynch deal that was brokered by the Fed and Treasury&#8230;</p>
<p>OK&#8230; To recap&#8230; Today is a Jobs Jamboree Friday, and I&#8217;m getting the feeling that it will be disappointing VS the forecast of 175,000 job losses. G-7 meets this weekend, and there might be a change in the what they say after each meeting. The ghost of Japanese recoveries, is at work in the U.S. Ireland votes on the Lisbon Treaty today, and the dollar remains well bid VS the non-dollar currencies&#8230; Except yen!</p>
<p>And this&#8230; On Monday next week, I will be doing an educational presentation for the folks at DTI&#8230; You can find out more here: http://www.dtitrader.com/trading_education_MMM_everbank.htm</p>
<p>Currencies today 10/2/09: .8630, kiwi .7130, C$ .9175, euro 1.4550, sterling 1.5850, Swiss .9620, rand 7.72, krone 5.8250, SEK 7.0420, forint 186.20, zloty 2.9185, koruna 17.4750, RUB 30.20, yen 89.30, sing 1.4170, HKD 7.75, INR 47.75, China 6.8265, pesos 13.77, BRL 1.7860, dollar index 77.20, Oil $69.69, 10-year 3.15%, Silver $16.25, and Gold&#8230; $996.75</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for today&#8230;Time to get working on making this Friday, Fantastico!</p>
<p>Chuck Butler</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailypfennig.com/currentIssue.aspx?date=10/2/2009">Source: A Jobs Jamboree Friday! </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-jobs-jamboree-friday-7/20844/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spending Soars, Savings Suffer</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/spending-soars-savings-suffer/20837</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/spending-soars-savings-suffer/20837#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Mathias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash for Clunkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Mathias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Personal spending soared 1.3% in August, the biggest monthly leap since 2001, the Commerce Department announced today. Of course, this $129 billion jump in consumption “shows strength in August, indicating some economic improvement,” as CNN writes. A quick look at the chart reveals that the once sober American consumer is starting to fall off the wagon yet again.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">As always, the drama’s in the details. “Cash for clunkers” was by far the biggest driver of new spending, almost single-handedly pumping up durable goods orders 5.8%. Interestingly, August’s rise was the biggest since October 2001 — right after Sept. 11, when retailers slashed prices and President Bush urged us to go shopping and “Get down to Disney World.” Heh… looks like only&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Personal spending soared 1.3% in August, the biggest monthly leap since 2001, the Commerce Department announced today. Of course, this $129 billion jump in consumption “shows strength in August, indicating some economic improvement,” as CNN writes. A quick look at the chart reveals that the once sober American consumer is starting to fall off the wagon yet again.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img title="Personal Consumption Expenditures" src="http://dailyreckoning.com/files/2009/10/DRUS10-01-09-1.JPG" alt="Personal Consumption Expenditures" width="470" height="381" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">As always, the drama’s in the details. “Cash for clunkers” was by far the biggest driver of new spending, almost single-handedly pumping up durable goods orders 5.8%. Interestingly, August’s rise was the biggest since October 2001 — right after Sept. 11, when retailers slashed prices and President Bush urged us to go shopping and “Get down to Disney World.” Heh… looks like only government decree can whip us into such consumption frenzies.</p>
<p>And for our 1.3% leap in spending, American incomes rose just 0.2%. In fact, when adjusted for inflation and taxes, what the government calls “real disposable income” actually fell 0.2%. What’s more, we as the collective “consumer” spent over $129 billion more in August, but chose to save $112 billion less. Savings as a percentage of personal income is now down to 3%, from 4% in July.</p>
<p>This “indicates economic improvement”? Must be reading the wrong release…</p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/spending-soars-savings-suffer/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/spending-soars-savings-suffer/">Source: Spending Soars, Savings Suffer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/spending-soars-savings-suffer/20837/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 3.170 seconds -->
