Supplies fell further than expected, with a 4.56 million decline to 302.2 million barrels last week, the U.S. Energy Information Administration announced. At the same time, refineries operated at just 88.6% capacity, a decline of 1.1% from the week prior. Most analysts had expected a mean capacity increase of 0.3%, according to a
Bloomberg News survey.

“This move was sparked by the very bullish crude inventory number,” Daniel Flynn, a broker with Alaron Trading Corp. in Chicago, told Bloomberg. “Falling inventories make us vulnerable to disruptions. The cheap dollar is only adding fuel to the fire.”

The high cost of oil is dampening demand of already overstretched U.S. consumers. U.S. demand declined 1.3% in the four week ended June 6, the energy department said.

However, demand is rapidly increasing in emerging markets such as China, where oil imports shot up 25% last month from the same period a year ago. Imports to the Asian nation increased to 16.2 million metric tons in May, which is about 3.8 million barrels a day, the Beijing-based Customs General Administration of China announced on its Web site yesterday.

“The big crude draw is obviously bullish, but more importantly for the oil markets, the dollar is falling and that could send us back to near $140 a barrel,” Mark Waggoner, president of Excel Futures in Huntington Beach, Calif., told Reuters.

Other factors contributed to the price jump, as well. Nigeria continues to experience production problems due to attacks from the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND), which has made life particularly difficult for oil majors such as Royal Dutch Shell PLC (ADR: RDS.A, RDS.B) by bombing pipelines and kidnapping workers.

Russia, the world’s second-largest oil supplier, is also experiencing problems. At a presentation in London yesterday, BP PLC (ADR: BP) Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward said Russian output would continue to fall without changes to the current tax policy of the Russian government.

“Russian authorities are responding” with fiscal regime changes, though it may take “a couple of years to reverse the current trend,” Hayward said.

High Oil, High Gas, Weak Economy

If oil stays near $140 per barrel, gas prices could easily top $4.75 a gallon by the Fourth of July holiday, Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com (MCO), said in a recent research note.

And while the thought of gas at almost $5 per gallon is distressing enough, Money Morning’s Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald thinks gas prices could go even higher. In fact, U.S. motorists could easily be looking at $7 a gallon gasoline within just two years. And that could have a disastrous impact on the U.S. economy.

“The bottom line is that the effect on the economy is going to be a lot worse than anyone’s talking about right now,” said Fitz-Gerald, a longtime energy bull who recently boosted his oil-price projection to $225 a barrel. “The bottom line is this: Until someone develops a truly [interchangeable] alternative for oil and gasoline – something that works the same, costs the same and is just as effective – Americans are just going to have to face the fact that over time they’re going to pay more.”

By fixating on near-term prices, and near-term fallout, Fitz-Gerald says that investors and economists alike are missing the bigger point: Long-term – or at least until a true replacement for oil is found – the U.S. economy is going to be badly stung, and U.S. consumers who don’t take steps to protect themselves are looking at a markedly reduced standard of living.

Moody’s Economy.com’s Mark Zandi agrees.

“Unless oil prices soon recede and Washington changes its views and acts to shore up the housing market and broader economy, the outlook for 2009 will weaken further in coming months,” Zandi said.

Zandi added that the U.S. Federal Reserve “will sacrifice near-term growth for the sake of stable prices and the economy’s longer-term prospects” and that the high cost of oil will prevent any further interest rate cuts.

But don’t look for gas prices to move up in a straight line to $5, $6 and $7 a gallon, Fitz-Gerald says. Prices will continue to fluctuate. There will be rallies, and retrenchments, as is the case with the price of any commodity.

But prices will rise, as there is still no truly “fungible” – interchangeable – replacement for petroleum. That’s what’s needed, Fitz-Gerald says.

In the interim, investors should: be “long” on oil and other commodities; have alternative-energy-related investments; and look for profit plays in ancillary sectors, Fitz-Gerald says.

Source: Oil Price Soars $5 on Reduced Supply, Gas Could Head Much Higher

Google, Chevron and Goldman are all betting that this prediction is correct. This from Bloomberg:

Unlike photovoltaic solar panels that convert sunlight to electricity, solar thermal focuses sunrays with mirrors to heat oil in glass pipes to about 700 degrees Fahrenheit (370 degrees Celsius). The oil turns water to steam, which spins an electric turbine. A solar thermal unit that begins operation in 2010 will produce power at 14.2 cents a kilowatt hour, almost triple the 4.8 cents for a plant using pulverized coal, the Energy Information Administration estimates.

Costs for solar thermal may fall as low as 3.5 cents a kilowatt hour by 2020, according to a report commissioned by the U.S. Energy Department. Meanwhile, coal expenses may rise. Congress is considering limits on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions. The purchase of pollution permits may be required under a measure the Senate will begin debating next month.

Chevron, Goldman Sachs, FPL, PG&E and other companies have filed more than 50 applications with the Bureau of Land Management to lease government-owned desert property for solar power systems … Google’s philanthropic division put $10 million into eSolar, a start-up in Pasadena, California. Dan Reicher, a former Energy Department official who manages the unit’s climate and energy initiatives, said there will be more such investments.

The PowerShares Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has more than $1.5bn in assets and is one of the most popular ways to invest in solar, biomass, wind, and geothermal energy, says Brian Hunt in Daily Wealth.

“Common sense tells us when the holy trinity of fossil fuels – crude oil, coal, and natural gas – rise in price, companies that provide cleaner substitutes should also rise in price.

“PBW’s only been around for three years […] But with oil approaching $130 a barrel and clean energy stocks out of favor, expect a rally from the ‘treehugger-approved’ companies of the world.”

“Solar panels won’t be accepted en masse unless the economics of it makes sense,” says Charles Delvalle in Investor’s Daily Edge. “Sure, adoption is growing. But it won’t be mainstream until everyone can afford it. The same goes for wind power.

“With so many solutions not making any economic sense, why is adoption skyrocketing? You can thank the government and their incentives. States are ramping up incentives for clean energy production (like California’s $3.3 billion solar initiative). If it weren’t for government incentives adoption would drastically drop.

“When you combine these government incentives with the whole culture change that’s going on, you have a recipe for amazing growth.”

Just when I thought I had completely lost my sense of humor, I ran across a MoneyNews.com article titled “Lehman Bros. Report: Oil Bust in the Cards”. Hahahaha! Thanks, Lehman!! Hahaha! I needed the laugh!

Perhaps part of the humor is that this comes at the same time as the price of gasoline went up 3 cents to another record high of an average of $3.70 a gallon. This is up 22% from this time last year! 22 percent! 22! Hahahaha!

It gets even funnier when Lehman is not just predicting lower prices, but “Lehman is now predicting prices at $83 a barrel in 2009 and as low as $70 in 2010.” At this point I am laughing so hard that my stomach hurts, and since I am on the verge of pooping in my pants, I am desperately trying to stop laughing by sticking my own thumb in my eye, but it does no good! I just keep going, “Hahahaha! Oww! Hahahaha! Oww!”

But $70 a barrel of oil? Hahahaha! Oww! Hell, the cost of production is higher than that! So does Lehman think that production costs are going to go down? Hahahaha! Oww!

Bill Bonner here at The Daily Reckoning, taking no notice of my anguish or my thumb, says, “Ten years ago, China imported 165 million barrels of oil per year. Today, the total is more than 1 billion. Wonder why the price of oil hit a new high last week – above $126 a barrel? Well, China is a big part of the answer.” A whopping 600% increase in ten years, and yet Lehman thinks that oil will go down in price? Hahahaha! Oww!

Kevin Kerr at Whiskey and Gunpowder says, “According to the most recent data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, oil demand for countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development – which includes developed nations like Japan, Germany and the United States – has gone up 14% since 1980. Oil demand for the rest of the world, however, has skyrocketed 43%. That’s more than three times as fast!”

And yet Lehman thinks that the price of oil will go down? Hahahaha! Owww!

So, handily summing up, you can take it from me, the Loudmouth Mogambo Prognosticator (LMP), the guy with the ready laugh and the sore eye where somebody keeps sticking his thumb in it, when I tell you that there is no way, absolutely no way, absolutely no freaking way in hell that oil will be that low next week, next month, next year or ever! Hahahaha! Oww!

I was going to go to the medicine cabinet to find something that would stop my eye from mysteriously hurting, when it fell on Sean Brodrick at MoneyandMarkets.com writing, “According to the International Energy Agency, China’s overall oil demand rose by 7.8% in February from a year earlier, much higher than earlier estimates of a 5.3% gain. And gasoline demand rose by 22.8%!”

Careful Mogambo Scholars will take particular note of the use of Mr. Brodrick’s use of exclamation points in highlighting the rise in gasoline demand, as this means to me a rise in the use of internal combustion engines, meaning that a lot of work is being done, which means that a lot of raw materials are being consumed.

In fact, he reports, “As a result of that surge in demand, China’s crude oil imports rose 15% in the first quarter and 25% in March. Its imports are rapidly accelerating!” Again one notes the use of the exclamation point!

And in another very populous country, India, he says that “oil product sales – a proxy of demand – surged by 10.9% in February compared to a year earlier.” Yow! Eleven percent in one year!

The interesting part, which is a euphemism for, “the price of oil is going to go through the freaking roof one of these days real soon, and for a long time after that, too, and if you want to make a lot of money, then get your worthless butt in gear and go out and buy things connected with oil” because all of this gigantic surge in demand is coming at a time when supply is shrinking.

This is made manifest when Mr. Brodrick reports that “oil production is already shrinking in 60 of the world’s 98 oil producing countries. So it’s no surprise that in March, global oil supply fell by 100,000 barrels per day, led by lower supplies last month from OPEC, the North Sea and non-OPEC Africa.”

And Kevin Kerr agrees, too. “Unfortunately” he writes, “there’s no way for supply to keep up.” As in “no way, absolutely no way, absolutely no freaking way in hell, just as The Mogambo put it in a previous paragraph”, which he could have said but didn’t.

This is important stuff, so I call up the local paper and tell them that I want one of their stupid little reporters to come over for my news conference so that I can tell the world what is happening. The little receptionist asks, “Is this The Mogambo?” and I proudly say, “Yes, it is!” Then, suddenly, the line goes dead! So I call back, and the same little receptionist asks, “Is this The Mogambo?” and I proudly say “no!”

Then she says, “Is this about inflation?”, and I say, yes, it will impact inflation, and before I can say another word, she says, “It’s you, you Stinking Mogambo Idiot (SMI)!”, and hangs up again!

So, if you never read in your newspaper how inflation is going to kill all of us, especially inflation in the price of energy, then blame the stupid little receptionist.

The inflation you can blame on the corrupt Federal Reserve, and the corrupt Congress (except Ron Paul), which encouraged them, and the corrupt Supreme Court, which let them continually ignore the part of the Constitution that requires that money be only of silver and gold.

Until next time,

The Mogambo Guru
for The Daily Reckoning

The Mogambo Sez: Being as sweet and brief as I can manage, under the circumstances, if you aren’t buying gold and silver, you are a moron.

Source:  ‘Oil Bust’ Headline Makes a Good Punch Line

The PPI report will undoubtedly rekindle the inflation-versus-recession debate (with more than a few comments about stagflation thrown in for good measure).

While the wholesale inflation gauge (PPI) provides another look into how escalating food and energy prices are impacting the economy, the most recent moves in oil and gas may not be factored in for another month or two.

On an optimistic note, gasoline prices historically peak around Memorial Day and then fall throughout the remainder of the summer. As we’ve said here a number of times before, don’t expect that pattern to repeat itself this year [Indeed, please click here to check out a related story in this issue of Money Morning that details our expectation that oil-and-gasoline prices are headed even higher].

In this column four weeks ago, we told you to ignore a U.S. Energy Department forecast that gasoline prices at the pump would reach $3.73 a gallon before falling. In fact, I said flat out that the Energy Department was wrong. And Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald shortly thereafter reiterated that belief that the Energy Department’s prediction was way off the beam. And how right we were – that price already has been surpassed and consumers in some parts of California and Hawaii are paying in excess of $4.00 a gallon.

Less than two weeks ago we actually boosted our target price for oil to $225 a barrel (remember that Keith Fitz-Gerald, now Money Morning’s investment director, was probably the first investment guru to predict triple-digit oil prices).

As noted, however, much of this won’t be reflected for a couple of weeks.

Wednesday’s release of the minutes from the last Fed meeting should provide investors with a bit more insight into the mindsets of central bank policymakers and just how likely they will be to stand pat on interest rates: In one of the most aggressive rate-cutting campaigns in the central bank’s history, policymakers have pared the benchmark Federal Funds rate seven times since mid-September. Investors expect the Fed to sit tight (and hold off on further rate activity) at least through the summer months.

More retailers will report this week [Target Corp. (TGT), The Home Depot Inc. (HD) but few surprise are expected at this point in an earnings cycle that – except for the discounters – has been full of disappointing retail-sales reports.

The Money Morning Story SNAFU

When they received their daily e-letter last Monday, sharp-eyed Money Morning readers noticed something peculiar about this column.

It seemed familiar.

There’s a very good reason they felt that way. They were right.

Due to a technical problem, and some human error, the column we’d put together for Monday’s newsletter was inadvertently replaced by the afore-mentioned April 14 story in which we’d told you that the Energy Department’s optimism about summer gasoline prices was wrong.

We replaced that story on the Web site with the correct piece – a warning about the week’s upcoming retail-sales reports, but we heard about the mistake. As we deserved to.

As bad as we felt about the mistake, we still found several positives. First and foremost, we were reminded yet again that we have a loyal following that reads our work closely and carefully – and for the most part enjoys and benefits from what we do.

And if you all had to read one of our “old” stories a second time, I’m happy to say that it was a strongly worded prediction piece that proved us correct.

Market Matters

Over that past year-plus, the subprime debacle and related credit crisis have prompted discussions about “disaster,” “devastation,” “tragedy,” and “catastrophe.” Homeowners were unable to afford their houses, institutions faced significant asset write-downs, hard-working folks lost jobs, and investors watched portfolio values decline. While these financial consequences undoubtedly have been traumatic for many, the events of the past two weeks can serve to lend some perspective. The death toll in Myanmar has reached about 80,000 with another 50,000 people still missing. Likewise, in China, where the earthquake eventually may take over 50,000 lives as well. Somehow, missing quarterly earnings by a few cents simply does not seem quite as significant.

Speaking of…earnings season plugged along and the results to date have given some analysts (the slightest) reason for optimism. As the week began, about 90% of Standard & Poor’s 500 Index companies had reported and 62% actually beat expectations. While average quarterly earnings have plummeted by over 17% on a consolidated basis, the results looked far stronger once the financial firms were removed from the equation.

Without that struggling sector, first-quarter profits actually increased by more than 7%. Retailers took center stage this week as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) proved again that discounters are benefiting from the current consumer nervousness. However, while Macy’s Inc. (M) and JC Penney Co. Inc. (JCP) suffered from weak sales, their results (and guidance) bested Street projections. Sony Corp. (ADR: SNE) rebounded as TVs and cameras moved back onto consumer shopping lists. Bond insurers MBIA Inc. (MBI) and Freddie Mac (FRE) reported wider losses, while UK-based HBSC Holdings PLC (ADR: HBC) realized higher profits.

Board directors and corporate execs again played “Let’s Make a Deal” as CBS Corp. (CBS) announced its intent to buy CNET Networks Inc. (CNET); Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ) made overtures toward Electronic Data Systems Corp. (EDS); General Electric Co. (GE) is reportedly putting its long-time appliance biz up for auction; and billionaire stakeholder Carl Icahn pushed for Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO) management to reopen talks with Microsoft Corp. (MSFT). Analysts often welcome merger news and consider it a positive sign of a rebounding business climate. Research in Motion Ltd. (RIMM) shares soared this week on news that its newest Blackberry creation will soon hit the market; and Merck & Co. Inc. (MRK) received a major victory when a Texas appeals court overturned a Vioxx verdict that, initially, awarded $32 million in damages.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) apparently enjoyed the limelight (and the stir its analysts caused) two weeks ago. Last week, the investment bank was at it again, forecasting that crude prices will rise to $141 a barrel during the second half of 2008. Oil surged to about $128 a barrel late last week as gasoline prices soared to over $3.75 a gallon – just a week before the widely-traveled Memorial Day weekend.

What’s he talking about? Mexico has just over 12 billion barrels of oil reserves, or ten percent of the world’s total. It exports 1.5 million barrels per day to the U.S., putting it third behind Canada and Saudi Arabia, and just ahead of Nigeria and Venezuela.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

The trouble is that Mexico’s government has been using the state oil company, Pemex, like a cash machine that never runs out. Pemex contributes 40% of the total tax revenues of Mexico’s Federal Government. It’s a resource of the people, for the people, and by geology. But you cannot print oil on a printing press. There is no such thing as “just in time” energy resources.

Mexico’s government has not been investing enough in exploration or new production to top off Pemex’s reserves. Those reserves are being depleted. What’s more, its largest oil field Cantarell, is in an alarming state of decline. Cantarell was discovered in the Gulf of Mexico in 1976 by a fisherman. Estimates are that it was a 20 billion barrel discovery.

Mexico has been producing from it ever since in huge numbers. But those production numbers appear to have peaked in 2004 at around 2 million barrels per day. Today, Cantarell produces just 1.4 billion barrels per day-a loss of 600,000 barrels a day in four years. Overall Mexican production peaked at 3.4mbpd 2004 but is now under 3mpbd. In the first two months of this year alone, Mexican oil production fell 6.4% compared to the same time last year.

Enjoy the oil while it lasts folks. Of course, it’s going to last for a very long time. Peak oil doesn’t mean that all the world’s oil will be gone. It means that all the world’s cheap oil will be gone.

That loss will have a radical effect on economic and social arrangements that were built on cheap energy. And for nation states like Mexico (and Venezuela, and Saudi Arabia) that finance welfare states with oil revenues, it will be a disaster unless oil profits are turned into income producing capital assets-instead of merely redistributed as transfer payments…or tuned into new Towers of Babel.

“We should leave oil before it leaves us,” said International Energy Agency chief economist Faith Birol in an interview with German monthly journal International Politics. There’s an idea.

Birol says the world has time to make other energy plans, but not much. The rise in the oil price will be gradual he says, as a function of declining production and growing demand. “But looking at this long-term, it becomes clear that nothing changes whether oil runs out in 2030 or 2040 or 2050.”

We are assuming he’s referring to cheap oil and not the world’s total supply of oil. Either way, the warning is unambiguous. “One day it will definitely be finished. And I think we should leave oil before it leaves us. That should be our motto. We should prepare for that day with research and development, how we can replace oil, what kinds of living standards we will be able to maintain, what alternatives we can develop.”

Here here. Finding the commercial alternatives to oil is mainly what we’re up to in the Australian Small Cap Investigator.

Dan Denning
The Daily Reckoning Australia

P.S. to get The Daily Reckoning direct to your inbox sign up to our free e-mail newsletter or if you prefer to use RSS, subscribe to the Daily Reckoning RSS feed.