Bill Bonner (The Daily Reckoning, UK):

Gold rose $15 yesterday. What to make of it?

Perhaps it was because Ben Bernanke’s extended his “extended period” pledge?

He said, in effect, if this economy doesn’t come out of its slump, it won’t be his fault. He’ll keep monetary policy as loose as possible for as long as possible. Not that we had any doubt about it. He has a theory. It’s a bad theory, but it’s all he has. And it tells him that you fight a depression with loose money.

So, what do you expect? Interest rates will remain artificially low as long as Bernanke can get away with it… or until the depression ends… whichever comes sooner.

That said, he hardly has to lift a finger. Judging from the last auction of short-term Treasury debt, lenders can’t think of anything better to do with their money than to give it to the government – in return for nothing. The last auction produced a yield of zero on one-month loans.

We went to visit a pair of clever Swiss bankers yesterday. These fellows manage money for clients all over the world. What do they think? They were focused on stocks:

“This year, the people who made the most money were those who were most heavily invested in equities. And if the patterns of the past hold up, 2010 will be a good year for equities too.

“Whenever the ten-year performance goes close to zero, the next few years tend to be very good for stock market investors.

“In fact, there has never been an exception, going all the way back to 1881. Last year was one of the worst years in stock market history. This has been one of the best. And next year should be one of the best too.”

He handed us a chart to illustrate his point. It shows the 10-year performance of the stock market.

We see that very rarely are stock market returns negative over a 10-year period. In fact, there are only two worth mentioning. One was in the ‘30s, when in August ‘39 stocks had returned MINUS 4.68% for the previous ten years.

The other major losing period came in February of this year, when investors had gotten an average annual return of -3.43% since 1999.

The message seems simple enough. When the market turns down sharply… expect a sharp turn-up to follow. But studying the chart more carefully, we see two things.

Click here for the rest of Mr. Bonner’s commentary on The Daily Reckoning, UK Edition.

So with that in mind, let’s check in on one “ultimate indicator” of the depression’s end.

5 Min. loyalists might remember that we first checked out this chart in late May, when Robert Gordon — one of the NBER economists responsible for calling the end of recessions — suggested that the peak in initial claims had marked the approximate end of this historic downturn. As you can see, that same thesis has worked pretty well in the past, so why not?

Yesterday, the Labor Department said 530,000 Americans filed for jobless benefits last week. That may be a slight improvement from the week before, but we note that since peaking this spring, jobless claims haven’t plummeted back to a historic norm, as in recessions past. Instead, they’re just hanging around, just 15% below the peak, almost 30% higher than this time last year and way above typical post-recession levels… actually higher than the peaks of yesteryear.

We realize that just by uttering these words we’re likely going to be wrong: But could it be different this time around? If the bread line is no longer at its worst, but still wrapped around the block, is it really fair for the Fed to say the recession is “technically” over?

And housing isn’t looking too pretty this week either. Yesterday saw a “surprise” fall in existing home sales. This morning, the Commerce Department says the median price of new homes in August fell 9.5%. That’s the biggest month-to-month decline in recorded history. The median price is now $195,000, down almost 12% from last year. Sales rose a statistically insignificant 0.7%.

The shred of good news from today’s report: New home inventory is down 36% over the last year, to a 7.3-month supply — the lowest level since January 2007. Still, on average, a newly completed home sits on the market for a record 12.9 months before it’s sold.

Source: Is it Really Over?

But while many analysts are focusing on threat of inflation – which could be a byproduct of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s reluctance to withdraw monetary stimulus – investors should really be watching China.

“In the post-financial crisis global economy, China is quickly becoming the proverbial ‘800-pound gorilla’ – the player that has to be courted, but that can’t be tamed,” said Money Morning Contributing Editor Peter Krauth.

In a recent article for Money Morning, Krauth said that he believes the stage has been set for gold to make a lasting run above $1,000 an ounce, in no small part because of China.

For the past six years China has quietly been stocking up on gold, boosting its holdings of the yellow metal to 1,054 metric tons from 400 metric tons in 2003.

What’s more is that earlier this year, the government finally made it legal for Chinese citizens to make their own purchases of the yellow metal.

As recently as 2002, the private ownership of gold was prohibited in China, with jail as the penalty for possession.  But now the government executed a stunning about face and removed all such restrictions. In fact, Beijing is actually encouraging its citizens to purchase the precious metal through state-run media.

China’s Central Television, the nation’s main state-owned television company, is now running news programs, which strongly resemble infomercials, explaining just how easy it is to purchase gold and silver as an investment.

“Simply put, the Chinese government is trying to trigger a national gold craze…and it’s working. The Chinese public now has gold trading platforms on steroids,” Paul Atherly, managing director at Leyshon Resources Ltd. (OTC ADR: LYRSY), said in an investor presentation in London.

Physical gold demand from private Chinese households rose 9% in the first half of this year, due to an “unprecedented” sales push across rural China, according to Gerry Chen, the World Gold Council’s local business development manager.

Most banks in China already offer customers gold and silver bullion bars in four different sizes ranging from one to five kilograms.

A Golden Opportunity?

Of course, it’s not just the Chinese public that is interested in stepping up its gold purchases. Even though China has nearly tripled the size its gold reserves in the past six years, the declining value of the dollar has given the Red Dragon even more incentive to stock up.

China has about $2 trillion in foreign currency reserves. The vast majority those holdings are in dollar-denominated securities, and therefore are susceptible to the declines in the value of the greenback.

The dollar was been in a precipitous freefall for years before the financial crisis hit in full, sending droves of investors flocking to shelter of the U.S. currency. But now that the global downturn is being to abate, many investors have regained their appetite for risk, and the dollar has resumed its decline.

The dollar has lost 2.5% to a basket of six currencies this month and nearly 5% since early July.

China’s Cheng Siwei, former vice chairman of the Standing Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, recently told Great Britain’s Telegraph newspaper that “If [the Fed] keep[s] printing money to buy bonds, it will lead to inflation, and after a year or two, the dollar will fall hard. Most of our [Chinese] foreign reserves are in U.S. bonds and this is very difficult to change, so we will diversify incremental reserves into euros, yen and other currencies.”

Gold provides China with an excellent opportunity to diversify away from the dollar. Many of the nation’s top policymakers agree, but there’s a question of timing.

“When we buy, the price goes up,” Siwei noted. “We have to do it carefully so as not to stimulate the markets.”

From 2003 to 2009, China spread out its gold purchases over a long period of time and relied heavily on Chinese producers.

But this time around there may be a shortcut, because the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has formally endorsed a plan on Friday to sell 403.3 tons of gold – equal to about one eighth of its holdings – to central banks or in the gold market. Gold demand was 3,880 tons last year, according to the World Gold Council.

That presents China with a tremendous opportunity, because if it decided to buy the gold, China would be able to seek a discount from spot prices, since a market sale would put downward pressure on bullion prices.

“China only has about 1,000 [metric tons] of gold reserves and the investments in other assets are performing not very well,” one official, who declined to be named, told Reuters. “I think we should build up more gold with foreign reserves, but when to buy is the key. It’s a good idea if China can buy the gold from IMF at prices well below market level.”

The Chinese are currently being converted from being the lowest per capita gold consumers in the world to a nation of small precious metals investors. By next year, Chinese gold consumption will likely overtake India, which has been for years the world’s biggest gold market.

With global gold production at best flat and probably in decline, even a small increase in Chinese buying could have a substantial impact on gold prices.

“The lesson here is clear: China’s growing appetite for gold is a powerful trend that will benefit gold investors for years – even decades – to come,” said Money Morning’s Krauth.

According to Krauth, “the biggest bang-for-buck still lies with the junior gold sector. The best proxy for this is the S&P/TSX Venture Composite Index (CDNX),” otherwise known as the Toronto Venture Exchange. It consists of about 75% resource stocks.

The CDNX has been steadily carving new highs almost uninterrupted since March, now posting a whopping 80% gain since its December 2008 low. That’s an impressive performance.

The players in this sector promising the best returns are the junior gold-and-silver companies either already producing, or with near-term production.

“With gold breaking and sustaining the $1,000 barrier, junior gold and silver miners are the place to be for explosive returns,” said Krauth. “Just hold onto your hat.”

Source: How China became the ‘800-Pound’ Gorilla in the Gold Market

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is up 58% from its March lows, gold has finally broken through the $1,000-an-ounce level – and may go higher – and bond yields have fallen substantially in spite of the huge U.S. budget deficit.

It’s really not difficult to tell when you’re in a bubble. What’s tough is trying to figure out how to invest while it’s developing.

When current Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke doubled the monetary base in a few weeks last fall, it was pretty obvious that the extra money would appear somewhere, either as zooming asset prices or as surging inflation. After all, the rapid increases in the U.S. money supply after 1995 produced a stock-market bubble and then a housing bubble.

And don’t forget about interest rates. When oil prices doubled in less than 12 months between 2007 and 2008, it was because Bernanke aggressively cut interest rates after the recession first hit in late 2007. So you’d have to believe that money supply was irrelevant not to expect markets to start behaving oddly at some point.

Silver and Gold …

That’s why – since late in 2007– I have been recommending investments in gold and other hard assets. While the recession had sharply reduced demand for oil, causing its price to drop from its record high of $147 a barrel in July 2008 to around $30 in February, the gold price had dropped only from its March 2008 peak of $1,000 to around $700, before rebounding. Gold prices remain far below the inflation-adjusted equivalent of their 1980 peak, which would be around $2,300 per ounce today.

Likewise, silver prices are even further below their 1980 peak, which would be around $130 per pounce, or nearly 10 times the current level. Since both gold and silver markets are relatively thin compared to the money available – annual gold production is only $100 billion at current prices – the potential for a run-up is considerable.

The difference between a bubble and a sound bull market is that a bubble happens more quickly. Normal valuation metrics get ignored. You couldn’t rationally justify – on any sort of long-term basis – the dot-com stock prices of 1999, the California house prices of 2005, or the $147-per-barrel record oil prices of 2008.

Similarly, today’s cost of extracting gold is nowhere near $1,000 an ounce. Mining costs have increased. But extraction costs are still only about $400 an ounce for top-tier miners.

Likewise, with inflation at 2% and U.S. budget deficits at more than $1 trillion per annum, there’s no justification for a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond yield below 3.5%.

Let’s look at stocks. And let’s say that the market of early 1995 – when the Dow Jones Industrial Average was at 4,000 – is a reasonable base for estimating a fair value for the U.S. stock market. If that were the case, then inflating the Dow in line with nominal gross domestic product to keep it at fair value would bring us to a current day estimate of 7,800.

[The Dow closed yesterday (Thursday) at 9,783.92. To reach this “fair-value” level, the Dow would have to drop 1,984 points, or 20% – enough of a decline to qualify as an official “bear market.”]

However 1995 wasn’t a bear market, and economic and earnings prospects that year were really good. Besides, the Internet was just starting its rise to prominence. Today, we’re in a deep recession, with huge budget deficits and high unemployment, yet the Dow is closing in on 10,000.

In other words, U.S. stocks are overvalued. Even after the bearish trauma of last year, we remain in a stock-market bubble.

Four “Bubble” Investing Strategies – Including the One That Works

Bubble investing is different from bull-market investing. There aren’t many “good” values, so you have to be very careful.

One bubble-market strategy is to just put everything in cash and hide under the bed. How boring! Plus, as your neighbors brag about their profits at cocktail parties, you’ll feel like an idiot until the bubble bursts. Remember, even after your neighbors’ profits have turned to losses and you look smart, you can never get those cocktail parties back!

That doesn’t mean you should abandon prudence, however. You should certainly keep much higher cash reserves than normal. Indeed, consider investing a chunk of that cash in one of the non-dollar-denominated WorldCurrency Access Deposit Accounts offered by EverBank.

At the same time, it’s a pity to completely miss out on the returns one can earn in a bubble environment. But you have to careful and smart.

A second bubble-investing strategy is to find something that isn’t overvalued, and buy only that. That strategy worked great for me back in 1999. I was working in Croatia, which was going through a deep economic crisis. NATO was bombing neighboring countries in the Kosovo War. That played merry hell with tourism, Croatia’s main foreign currency earner. Croatian shares – there were about six at the time – were each selling at less than five times earnings. So I invested in Croatia and made out nicely when the war ended and things returned to normal.

The problem with that approach is globalization. It was just possible in 1999 to find undervalued investments, if only by putting your money close to a war zone. It isn’t really possible now, at least not to any great extent. Three months ago, there were lots of shares even in the United States, which had been bombed out by the downturn and hadn’t recovered. There aren’t many left now; if a share is bombed out today there’s probably good reason for it.

A third potential strategy is to try to time the bursting of the bubble. For example, you could buy the ProShares UltraShort Trust (NYSE: TBT), inversely related to twice the Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (OTC: LEHMQ) 20-year bond index. Then you’d wait for the bond market to crash, and TBT to soar.

But there are two problems:

• First, the ProShares UltraShort Trust has a fair-sized tracking error, because they have to rebalance the fund daily. Thus if you hold it too long, you won’t do as well as you should.
• Second, the bubble can take a long time to burst; meanwhile it goes on inflating and you get killed. In the long run, it was a good idea to short Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO) in 1999. In the short run, it wasn’t so clever.

The Winning Play

The normal investment approach, to buy only the most conservative companies in an overvalued but bubbly sector, also doesn’t work. Everybody else is looking for them, too. And that means they end up being overvalued. Besides, they will advance only modestly with the inflating bubble, so you won’t make enough to compensate for the risk of buying too high.

The best alternative, therefore, is to buy bubbly investments – but the junk, not the cream. Buy gold and silver mines that even at $900 an ounce have only been running at close to break-even, because they have expensive deposits.

Don’t buy political risk (i.e. mines in dodgy countries), because if the gold price goes up, the local dictator will seize your company’s winnings. But operating risk is okay. And high operating costs are fine. If your mine has operating costs of $800 an ounce, you’ll make out like a bandits if gold goes from $1,000 an ounce to $1,200. That way, you need only put a modest amount in the investment, and it will zoom up to several times what you paid, making as much profit as if you’d put your entire fortune in something conservative.

Make sure to put only a portion of your money in such a play. Keep the rest in cash.

When to sell? Well, start selling at the first signs that the Fed is beginning to take inflation seriously, meaning the central bank will be pushing up interest rates. You’ll know when this is because you’ll likely start hearing a lot about Fed “exit strategies.”

Don’t be greedy – better to sell too early than too late. Better to leave the theater at the first wisp of smoke, than to wait until the entire crowd is panicking and heading for the exits.

I hate bubbles. And I hate Bernanke and the other central bankers for causing them by their misguided monetary policies. But you can make money out of them. Just don’t get carried away.

Source: The Only Way to Profit from a Stock Market Bubble

A majority of those polled by Bloomberg think it’s great; 61% said they thought they economy had taken off and was flying high. Stocks are up. Commodities are up. And here’s another Bloomberg headline: “Global investors give Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke top marks…”

The recovery has won the approval of economists and the public. It has almost everything going for it. It just won’t fly!

Comes news this morning that the US economy is still on the runway. This report from the AP explains why:

“WASHINGTON (AP) – Consumers slashed their borrowing in July by the largest amount on record as job losses and uncertainty about the economic recovery prompted Americans to rein in their debt.

“Economists expect consumers will continue to spend less, save more and trim debt to get household finances decimated by the recession into better shape. Such behavior, though, is a recipe for a lethargic revival, because consumer spending accounts for 70 percent of economic activity.

“The Federal Reserve reported Tuesday that consumers in July ratcheted back their credit by a larger-than-anticipated $21.6 billion from June, the most on records dating to 1943. Economists had expected credit to drop by $4 billion.”

Hey, not bad… economists were only off by 440%. Consumers are paying down debt more than 4 times faster than they thought. Partly because they want to. And partly because they have to. They don’t want to borrow… and banks don’t want to lend to them anyway. Consumer credit is falling at a 10% annual rate, based on July figures. Credit card debt is going down at an 8% rate.

When they pay down a dollar’s worth of debt that is one dollar less in the consumer economy. But it’s also a dollar that is not borrowed. Where the consumer spent all his income two years ago… and borrowed more so that he could increase his consumption even further… now, he doesn’t borrow… and he doesn’t spend all his income either. Now, the money that used to pour into consumer spending leaks out.

As we reported yesterday, personal spending is dropping… the figures were down in 4 of the last 6 quarters – something that has never happened before, since they began keeping records in 1947. And the level of consumer spending is down 33% from a year ago – with discretionary spending now down to a level it hasn’t seen in 50 years.

Of course, that’s just what we’ve been saying. The great credit expansion began in 1945. It ended in 2007. Credit will contract for many years. One study, also reported here, suggested that consumers would spend 14% less – even after the economy was back on its feet. We estimate that the total level of debt must go down below 200% of GDP. If that’s correct, we need to pay down about $25 trillion of debt. That won’t be easy and it won’t be quick.

And it will mean high levels of joblessness for a long time. Already, two out of five working-age Californians are unemployed. The other three are working the shortest workweeks in history. No wonder; with spending dropping, sales are falling. So businesses don’t need so many people to make, ship, sell and service their products. Then, of course, when they lay off workers to cut expenses, the unemployed workers have to cut spending!

How is it possible for a consumer economy to grow when consumers are spending less money? Of course, it’s not. This is not a genuine recovery… it’s an imposter. A fraud. A recovery impersonator.

While the private sector is paying down debt, the public sector is adding debt at a ferocious pace – about $150 billion per month. Public spending isn’t the same as private spending. It is usually spending for things that people wouldn’t buy if they had a choice. And it comes with a whole new risk attached – the risk that the feds will inflate their way out of debt rather than pay it off.

Government spending does not bring a durable, real prosperity. (If it did… think how easy it would be to make people rich; governments love to spend money!) It may look like a recovery. It may have shiny wings and spiffy-looking stewardesses. But it won’t fly.

*** The World Economic Forum has taken the US down from the number one position. America is no longer the world’s ‘most competitive’ economy. That title goes to Switzerland.

Meanwhile, the US banking system is rated #109 in the world – just below Tanzania. US banks became leveraged casinos during the bubble years. They’ve still got a lot of leverage… and are still trying to relive those glory days when players lined up to spin the wheel… and free drinks flowed by Niagara Falls.

*** “Keeping up with children is a full-time job,” said Elizabeth last night. “There is always at least one of them who needs help. Sometimes more than one.

“Sometimes I wonder if we shouldn’t devote ourselves more fully to helping them. That’s our main project, isn’t it? It’s the thing that is most important, isn’t it?

“So… shouldn’t we go to where they are… and give them advice… help them get their careers and families established? I mean, we’re in Europe. Our children are mostly in the US. Shouldn’t we go back so we would be available to help them? Maybe we should rent a house in Los Angeles and stay there until Maria’s acting career is on a more solid footing, for example. At least, she’d have somewhere to go for Thanksgiving…

“The prevailing view in America is that children leave the nest when they are 18 or 21… and then, they’re on their own. But that’s not the view here in Europe. In Paris, I know lots of parents who stick with their children all their lives. They spend their vacations together. The parents buy an apartment for the children. They direct their careers… and pass judgment on marriage prospects. Not that the children always listen, but one generation is not left to its own devices. That’s why inheritance is such a touchy issue in France. People aren’t expected to make it on their own… they’re expected to get as much support from the family as possible…

“Sometimes I think we should take the same attitude. And we do to some extent… Still, I’m not sure the children would appreciate our help. I’m not even sure our help would really be much use. Sometimes they just need to make their own mistakes…

“Besides, we have our own projects… our own lives. I just don’t know what is best…”

Source: A Recovery Impersonator

From a mainstream economic perspective, it should be renamed Leisure Day, as unemployment is interpreted as an individual choice of leisure over paid labor effort. Of course, only a tenured professor could be expected to come up with such a conclusion. As it stands, it is currently estimated there is one job opening for every six people looking for work.

Since employment is a lagging indicator of economic activity, we learned over the years to dig deeper than the headline figure to get a read on where labor market conditions may be going. One of the more useful, but often ignored, parts of the employment report tells us about the percent of private industries that are net offering jobs. Even when payrolls are shrinking in total, some industries are still net hiring – and, indeed, this is part of how markets facilitate the reallocation of productive resources during a recession, which, as the Austrian approach reminds us, is crucial to long term-growth prospects.

This measure is called a diffusion index, and we prefer to look at the average in this series over the past three months to avoid too many miscues. As it stands, the breadth of private industries net hiring, though still at a lower level than the last recession, has consistently climbed from the March lows. The pace of broadening is even a bit stronger than what we observed in the last exit from a recession, which, as you may recall, was followed by a jobless recovery. If the slower pace of layoffs is all a sugar high from extreme policy measures, or if a double dip is about to open up before investor eyes, this is one of the places it should show up first. So far, this diffusion index is more consistent with an unemployment rate that peaks near year-end around 10% and begins to show some improvement in Q1 2010. We would also note while survey results still report perceptions of a very difficult job market, these measures have stabilized in recent months.

When firms start shedding labor more aggressively than their production activity is contracting, labor productivity (output produced per hour of work) tends to reaccelerate as the pressure on the remaining work force intensifies. In fact, productivity growth has begun to rebound, and we believe it has a good shot at pushing through 4% year-over-year growth by year-end, from the current 2% pace in the nonfarm sector. At the same time, businesses struggling to stay alive have pressured labor compensation growth. Hourly compensation (wages and benefits) growth has been on a disinflation (that is, decelerating inflation) path through the entire recession. We suspect it will be flirting with deflation near year-end, which is something we have not seen since Q4 in 1949.

If we put these two developments together – labor compensation growth approaching deflation, while labor productivity growth reaccelerates – we get deflation in unit labor costs. Companies that can hold the line on pricing while unit labor costs are falling will tend to experience rising profit margins, and rising profit margins are generally a signal to expand production. Improving cost conditions are one benefit of recessions, and if final demand can stabilize or improve from sources other than the household sector – say, fiscal policy or an improvement in the trade balance or the onset of some replacement capital spending – then this can be a route back to economic recovery. We will have more to say about this in the next monthly letter, but for the moment, it does look like firms are successfully compressing cost conditions.

This matters because with the release of Q3 S&P 500 earnings in October, we suspect strong operating leverage will become apparent to equity investors. Earnings improvement through Q2 has been all cost cutting related in a flat or falling revenue environment for most companies. If Q3 begins to show top-line revenue improvement, as we suspect it will, then earnings will be fed by both revenue and profit margin gains. After the seasonal September jitters, the exposure of the operating leverage available to firms that have cut to the bone could very well capture the imagination of investors, leading to the next leg in the advance of US equity indexes since early March.

According to supply managers in the manufacturing sector, goods sector production has been on the rise since June, and new orders are through the roof. By way of reference, the new orders index was scraping a new historical low back in December, rivaled only by the 1980 lows following Fed credit controls. Never before in the six decades of Institute for Supply Management (ISM) records have new orders surged so dramatically in any eight-month span. Never before has the ISM new order and production indexes recorded these levels without marking an escape from recession. No doubt the “cash for clunkers” sugar high has something to do with this, but we doubt it explains away all of the dramatic reversal in supply manager perceptions, as the export indicator in this report has also improved remarkably since the December 2008 lows.

These ISM results are usually good for a three-four month lead time on government reports for industrial production, shipments and new orders. We can anticipate the rebound depicted above will now reverberate in the monthly reports from here to year-end, at a minimum. In particular, the ISM production index has provided a reasonably good guide to year-over-year momentum in manufacturing production.

The sharpest monthly contractions in industrial production began in September of last year as the credit markets went into cardiac arrest, and all parts of the economy went into a cash grab/cash conservation mode so that prior cash commitments could be met. This included dramatically reducing production and liquidating existing inventory stocks. In other words, the comparisons against year ago are about to get ridiculously easy, and a healthy 5% year-over-year manufacturing production growth rate is certainly within reach by year-end 2009.

As summer slips away into the flaming leaf show of fall, we conclude the labor market is still a mess, but we can find some broadening of hiring activity even though total payrolls are still contracting. That means the necessary reallocation of productive resources, which is part of the function of recessions, is under way. More importantly, unit labor costs are falling as the pace of layoffs has overshot the contraction in output, and labor productivity is improving as a consequence, which is a second growth encouraging outcome of recessions.

The question remains what lies ahead after the massive quantitative easing operations of the Federal Reserve have lapsed and the bulk of the fiscal stimulus is behind us. In the very near term, we can surely expect auto sales to wilt following the end of the cash for clunkers program, but we remain impressed by what supply managers in the most cyclical part of the economy, namely manufacturing, have to say about new orders, production and export conditions. Policymakers panicked and adopted a “whatever it takes” stance, one that has proven to be the most radical outside of major wartime conditions. Looks like something took – and not surprisingly, gold is taking out the $1,000 per ounce mark at the same time.

Regards,

Rob Parenteau

Source: Unlabor Day

With this recent rush of upbeat economic news, it’s no wonder commentators are trumpeting the rebound of the U.S. economy.

But I think it’s time to short U.S. stocks.

Shocked?

Don’t be.

What most experts see as a strengthening U.S. rebound, I see as an increasingly dangerous “false dawn” – for these two key reasons:

• An overly expansive monetary policy that’s almost certain to spawn inflation.
• And a record-level budget deficit that will cause interest rates to spike, crimping economic growth.

A Foundation for Trouble

U.S. policies that were intended to combat the financial crisis that broke last year – as well as the recession that’s been plaguing us since December 2007 – have actually inflicted a lot of weakness upon our economic system.

For instance, the federal government has made $11.6 trillion in financing commitments, many of which will saddle us with debt for generations – some of it forever. Outlays of that magnitude in a $14 trillion economy are bound to have lasting implications: Think of the consumer who has a series of maxxed-out credit cards – he’ll make the minimum payments, but the actual balance will never get paid down.

And the foundation for this financial fiasco was actually constructed several years ago.

After the bursting of the 1996-2000 “dot-com” bubble, the U.S. Federal Reserve re-inflated the money supply. That caused stocks to resume their upward march, and as we now know, also inflated a housing bubble of such enormous size that it caused a general financial-system crash when that real estate bubble burst in 2007-08.

This time around, the Fed has been even more expansive. The benchmark Federal Funds Rate was 1.0% in 2002-04. This time it is 0.25%. What’s more, this time around we’ve had a $2 trillion expansion of the Fed balance sheet, a doubling of the monetary base and $300 billion worth of direct central bank purchases of government debt. Given this orgy of Fed expansionism, it’s likely that the onset of inflation – whether it’s in consumer prices or asset prices – will be correspondingly worse. In fact, we’re already seeing that gold prices are once again making a run at their all-time high. And crude oil hovers at about $70 per barrel, a level that would have been unimaginable before 2004.

Now that he’s been nominated for reappointment, U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke says he will tighten monetary policy in good time. But why should we believe him? If he tries to tighten significantly, he will incur the wrath of the Obama administration and the Democrats in Congress.

Even back during the 2001-04 time frame – when there was an administration in place that claimed to believe in monetary stringency – the Fed didn’t tighten. Bernanke himself was among the most aggressive opponents of tightening. Back in 2002, in fact, when inflation was running at a perfectly respectable 2%, Bernanke actually spun myths about the imminent onset of “deflation.”

Given what we know, it seems that if the current economic bounce shows even the slightest signs of faltering, Bernanke won’t tighten – he’ll pump even more money into the U.S. financial system. Rest assured that the administration, Congress, and much of the media will be cheering his move.

Borrow Now, Hurt Later

If an overly expansive monetary policy was the only problem we faced, it might not be so bad. Unfortunately, there’s more.

Lots more.

Unlike in 2002 – in fact, unlike any other time in U.S. history – this country now has a budget deficit in excess of 10% of gross domestic product (GDP). For fiscal 2009, that was forgivable: We’ve had a major recession, and a shattering financial crisis, which the federal government has tried to battle with aggressive bailout programs.

Here’s the problem, however: The projected deficit remains above 10% of GDP for fiscal 2010, even though no additional bailouts are contemplated and the Obama administration is projecting a modest-but-steady economic recovery.

The result is harder to predict – this country hasn’t travelled down this particular path before. This strategy bears some resemblance to the position Japan found itself in during its so-called “Lost Decade” of the 1990s. But even Japan’s deficit never reached this 10% threshold.

In Japan, the effect seems to have been the gradual abandonment of small business finance, and the resulting starvation of the most critical factor in economic growth – entrepreneurship.

The small-business sector creates most of the new jobs in the U.S. economy. But in a challenging environment, it’s easy to see why this sector gets overlooked. Without political connections or large contracts to hand out, the small-business sector ends up being last in line in the financing queue when the economy faces strong headwinds. Why should banks or other people lend to small businesses when the U.S. government bond market stands as such as huge, safe parking place for their cash?

Interest rates will also become an issue. With the inflationary pressures we expect to see from the overly expansive monetary policy we’ve described, long-term interest rates are likely going to rise anyway. As was the case in Japan’s decade-long malaise, these forces will combine to spark high default rates in the banking system, low or zero economic growth, and a general downward trend in the stock market.

All of this will make it tough for small businesses to obtain the cash they need to grow, meaning this key job-creation engine will have to sputter along.

It’s still early in the game, and there are many factors to consider, so the future economic picture remains a bit murky right now. But my guess is that the bubble in asset prices will be largely confined to commodities, that economic growth after this current initial burst will relapse, and that U.S. stocks will prove to be the same generally unattractive investment that they were in 1970s – the era of the so-called “Nifty Fifty.” If the stock market bubble gets even more exuberant from here, the relapse will be correspondingly more painful.

Profitable Pockets

Despite this dour backdrop, three things are worth remembering:

• First, all U.S. stocks are not created equal. Although I’m saying it’s time to short U.S. stocks, and I see tough times ahead for the key indices, there will always be individual stocks worth consideration, such as the “Alpha Bulldog” stocks I highlight in the Permanent Wealth Investor service.
• Second, the best way to play this looming downdraft – either as a direct profit opportunity or as a way of hedging your current portfolio – is through the use of what I like to call “Stage 3″ investments. An example of one such investment is long-dated “put” options on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, which trade on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. If you buy these options when they are way “out of the money” with a strike price far below the current price, in a real bear market (like that of 2007-09), you will see them really zoom up in value as the S&P drops down closer to the strike price, or possibly even falls below it.
• And third, understand that my pessimism about the U.S. market doesn’t apply to every other market around the world. While the monetary problems are more or less global, the budget-deficit problems are not. For instance, you might want to consider investments in Japan, where a recent election should spawn the kind of economic changes that will benefit savvy investors. Germany, too, looks to have avoided the contagion of “stimulitus,” which is why its economy is now viewed as one of the healthiest in Europe. Consider the iShares exchange-traded fund (ETF) entry for each of those two markets: The iShares MSCI Japan Index Fund (NYSE: EWJ) and the iShares MSCI Germany Index Fund (NYSE: EWG). They each warrant a look.

Source: The Two Reasons it’s Time to Short U.S. Stocks

But with all the artificial stimulus money floating around, here and abroad, you can never be sure of what you see. Is this a real recovery or is it an artificially ripened tomato, and hence an imposter? When the stimulus money stops flowing, will the recession get worse?

CNN’s bailout tracker reports that U.S. government stimulus has totaled $2.8 trillion so far this year, with another $8.2 trillion in commitments. Most of this money has gone to the financial sector. Some of it has gone to infrastructure projects and to consumers (“cash for clunkers,” for example).

That is a lot of money. It is hard to say how all of this spending has artificially boosted economic activity in some sectors of the economy. It is obvious that such spending cannot continue indefinitely.

Take a look at this next chart, which shows you how the stimulus spending reaches a peak sometime in early 2010 at $57 billion and then takes a dive.

Of course, the government can always decide to spend more. But as it is now, this is a pattern of spending we can expect to distort the various sectors it flows to. You can see also on the chart where the money goes, including that big red layer that goes toward highways and transportation.

We may yet see a surge in business activity as we get to 2010. But after that, we’ll see if this seeming recovery in the making is real or manufactured by funny money.

Source: Peak Stimulus

Consider this likely scenario: The heavy retail investor inflows into corporate bond funds last spring (far in advance of the peak in defaults, by the way) undoubtedly helped push corporate bond spreads down. The quant funds’ models detected this movement, concluded that the recession might be over, and proceeded to buy stocks that are highly sensitive to future U.S. consumer spending — including banks and REITs. This scenario likely explains some of the rally in bank and REIT shares, which occurred far in advance of the peak in credit losses.

This type of scenario could easily reverse this fall as experienced stock and bond fund managers start to question why they own barely solvent financial companies at valuations that imply 4-5% real GDP growth over the next two years. Huge swathes of the financial sector are insolvent (the mark-to-market value of assets is less than liabilities), and the debate over mark-to-market accounting boils down to whether losses should be recognized up front or over long periods of time. The losses are not going away, and were baked in the cake as soon as the bubble-era loans were made.

Last fall’s panic was not really a “black swan” event; it was the realization that much of the banking system was insolvent and at the mercy of electronic bank runs. Last fall, I thought that at the very least, the authorities had a plan to wind down Lehman in a controlled manner. Instead, Lehman went into forced liquidation and took the “shadow” banking system down with it. Our Lehman puts were huge winners, but even I was surprised at how quickly Lehman stock went to zero.

The issue facing REITs parallels that of the banks: an industry-wide solvency crisis. Only REITs lack access to enormous subsidies from the Federal Reserve, which include the manipulation of borrowing rates down to the range of 1%, resulting in a profitable spread on new lending.

If you carefully consider the combined statistics on commercial mortgage debt, equity, and future rental cash flows, you come to the conclusion that the value of many REITs is permanently impaired. Even if a core group of higher-quality REITs escapes bankruptcy, their equity will still be impaired because lenders will only refinance properties on very tight terms: strict covenants, high interest rates, and requirements of hefty equity infusions into upside-down properties. This is a transfer of wealth from REIT shareholders to creditors. This wealth transfer is occurring through many channels, but the most important one relates to claims on future rental cash flow, which will be bleak regardless of who owns it:

1. Creditors will take a higher share of those rental cash flows via higher interest rates
2. Of the cash flows that trickle down to shareholders, they will be divided up among more and more REIT shares as we see more and more dilutive secondary offerings

This unprecedented collapse in commercial real estate fundamentals means that for the next few years, you can throw out the analyses that rely on “cap rates” to value REITs. Distressed sellers and vulture buyers will make up the bulk of commercial real estate transactions for at least the next few years. Equity looking to invest will be scarce, so it will demand very low prices and high potential returns to invest.

Between now and 2013, $1.6 trillion in commercial real estate debt will mature. Bankers know this, so they’re going to keep conditions very tight for any refinancing that they grant. Plus, a hefty chunk of this debt is held by commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), in which the lenders cannot sit across the table and renegotiate with stressed borrowers; owners of senior CMBS tranches will want to liquidate the collateral to get paid back, while owners of the junior tranches will want to refinance and pray for a recovery in value. I expect the motives of the senior lenders to win out, resulting in lots of property liquidations.

REITs Selling Must Compete to Dump Properties

Lots of REITs have plans to sell properties to pay down debts but… Sell to whom? And at what sort of price? Yet REIT investors seem unaware the hundreds of billions in new equity that creditors will require to refinance mortgages that were made during the 2006-2007 peak in values — and what that catalyst will do to the value of their equity.

On Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal ran a story that relates to this theme: “Tishman Faces Office Downturn.” Link in Web Version Only. The article describes the tough choices facing privately owned real estate investment partnership Tishman Speyer, which owns Manhattan landmarks like the Chrysler Building and Rockefeller Center.

Tishman also owns a levered portfolio of Washington, D.C., properties named CarrAmerica. You’d think that with all the crony capitalists flocking to Washington the lobbying business is booming. But apparently, even lobbying is not a strong enough business to justify CarrAmerica charging the pricey rents it needs to pay its mortgages. The WSJ describes the financing problem:

The Tishman partnership that bought the CarrAmerica portfolio has been in talks with its lenders, led by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., since late 2008 about modifying the credit agreement, according to S&P. But so far, nothing has happened and, until now, the talks have been kept quiet. “We have confidence in the long-term value of the properties,” Rob Speyer said.

S&P warned even if Tishman wins new covenants, its ability to refinance the loans in 2011 “will likely require additional capital investment or a recapitalization.” [emphasis added]

The Tishman mortgages were one of many credits that Lehman was marking at fantasy levels. As it turns out, the bears on Lehman were right: The loans that Lehman provided to Tishman to finance its acquisition of Archstone-Smith were impaired soon after they were underwritten.

What will the Tishman family do about its privately held portfolio? How much debt is carried against Tishman Speyer’s properties? I get the impression that it’s a lot, considering Tishman’s aggressive behavior at the market peak (as opposed to, say, Sam Zell, who unloaded a ton of properties onto Blackstone (NYSE:BX) and Maguire (NYSE:MPG), which will both wind up losing most or all of their equity). Tishman Speyer will probably hit a lot of low bids on its second-rate properties to raise the cash that banks will require as new injections in order to refinance — and keep to deeds to — its trophy properties.

The smart money in commercial real estate — including Sam Zell — certainly sees the mountain of debt maturities coming down the pike. Investors will certainly be looking for bargains in commercial real estate, and they will find the best deals in either foreclosure auctions or purchasing commercial mortgages from stressed banks at a discount.

Regards,
Dan Amoss

Source: REITs Racing to Bankruptcy

Consumer confidence, of course.

We recently vowed to stop calling our national brethren “consumers” in favor of less degrading words — like Americans, citizens or just plain-old people. Thus, we report the Conference Board printed a surprisingly optimistic gauge of American consumption attitudes (doesn’t that sound better?) yesterday. After two months of decline, the index kicked back up to 54.1, just shy of a 2009 high.

Coupled with the latest printing of the home price index, that was enough to keep this mega-bounce alive and kicking. The news shot the S&P 500 to a 1% gain within moments of yesterday’s opening bell, which eventually faded into a 0.25% advance. The index is up almost 4% in the last five trading days. The Dow hasn’t fallen for six days in a row.

We accept that improving consumption attitudes could bump stocks higher, especially retail. But we wonder… do consumption attitudes lead markets, or the other way around?

Seems like Joe Six-pack is routinely late to the party, no? We blew the post Lehman crash, stayed gloomy during the best of the stock rebound, got bullish in June when stocks went nowhere and lost confidence last month when the market shot up again.

So what does a big improvement in consumption attitudes tell us now? If anything, that the stock rally is about to cool off.

“Retail is a terrible business to be in during a recession,” says Dan Denning, belaboring an obvious idea that seems lost on the world right now. “Don’t forget the primary economic and social trend right now: People are reducing their debts. They are cutting back, becoming more frugal and learning to live within their means.

“Of course, we think this is happening. But it could be totally wrong. Maybe the credit cards are finding their second wind and consumers are gearing up for one last credit bender. But our suspicion is that you are in the middle of a generational/cyclical shift in the attitudes toward debt and that this is generally bad news for retail stocks.”

Source: Can Consumers Lead the Market?