I call them the “zombies,” the institutions being propped up by government bailouts. Companies like Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC), General Motors Corp., Chrysler LLC, etc. On an operating level, these walking dead are sucking the life out of the recovery.

Unlike in previous downturns, huge resources have been devoted to propping up entities that should have been taken out of the picture.

Of course, it’s easy to avoid zombies directly. No one is going to force you to take a position in GM. But if you really want to know where to look for the bargains – for companies that have the greatest potential for serious growth in real numbers and real markets – you need to look for what I call “zombie-free zones.”

Unfortunately, the United States and the United Kingdom are not “zombie-free” zones – and thus offer the worst hunting ground available right now.

If you’re looking for something solid, there are only three places to aim your portfolio. In fact, my top three picks are…

Germany, Korea, and Canada.  All have an abundance of companies you can invest in with at least a good chance of not being forced to compete with the undead.

The Problem with Zombies

You see, the problem with zombie banks and companies is that they soak up resources that should be devoted to living banks and companies, while providing unfair competition that makes their competitors unsound.

It’s difficult to see this effect at the moment, because the U.S. Federal Reserve is propping up the banking sector. It’s much clearer in the automobile sector, where the zombies GM and Chrysler make it more difficult for Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) to compete. There’s no question that the continued existence of Chrysler after its first non-bankruptcy in 1979 drastically weakened Ford in the 1980s and 1990s.

There’s the effect on wages too. The United Auto Workers (UAW) union is a huge supporter of the GM and Chrysler rescues, partly because they keep UAW members employed at above-market wage rates. One certainly can sympathize with the great many American autoworkers that have lost their jobs, but by keeping the sector over-employed, the government is driving up wages and hurting businesses – particularly Ford, the only member of Detroit’s “Big Three” to not ask for a bailout.

The same effect can be seen in the banking sector. The bonus pool at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) is partly inflated by the continued employment of all the Citibankers who should have lost their jobs. Since banking pay scales got over-inflated during the bubble, it is reasonable now for them to come back down to earth, but that’s not going to happen while banks are in their current undead state.

Turning to the international market, it is immediately clear that Britain has the same problem as the United States, only on a larger scale. Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC (NYSE ADR: RBS) and Lloyds Banking Group PLC (NYSE: LYG), two of Britain’s largest banks have been kept open by the government. (Though, to be fair, Lloyds only got in trouble because the government made it acquire another failing bank, HBOS.)

Financial services is a huge part of Britain’s economy, which needs to diversify, but it won’t be able to diversify if so much of its talent is locked up in banking, and its best graduates are sucked into the high-paying dealing rooms of the City of London.

Japan has the same problem. Here the zombies are really ancient, cobwebbed skeletons left over from the 1990 collapse of Japan’s bubble. Some of them were put out of their misery by Junichiro Koizumi, the reformist prime minister, in 2003. Yet just this week we learned that many Japanese retailers face losses because of competition from The Daiei Inc. and Ito-Yokado Co. Ltd., gigantic retailing companies that were effectively bankrupt in 1993 but have been propped up by Japan’s banks. If you’re afraid of zombies, Japan is really creepy!

Historically, Europe is the continent where investors have suffered most from zombies propped up by governments. Certainly some countries, notably Italy, are attractive only for investment necrophiliacs.

Where to Find “Zombie-Free Zones”

There are some exceptions. Germany has only a few relatively small zombies. Both Sachsen LB and IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, the banks that got in trouble buying U.S. subprime mortgage-backed bonds, have been sold to other buyers – Sachsen to a larger Landesbank and IKB to the private equity group Lone Star Funds. Whatever their subsequent fate, those banks are currently being managed on a profit-maximizing basis.

There is a large older zombie, Hypo Real Estate Holding AG, the former Bayerische Hypothekenbank, which got in trouble in the late 1990s lending to real estate in the former East Germany, but that appears an isolated example. Industrially, Germany has been admirably rigorous in cleaning up its dead companies, and with its new pro-market government looks attractive for zombie-fearing money.

In Asia, South Korea is probably your best bet. The country had a big zombie problem ten years ago, but that problem has been cleared up with the bankruptcy and reorganization of several conglomerates and much of the banking system. This time around, there have been few major casualties and so the economy looks relatively zombie-free.

Finally, there is our northern neighbor, Canada. Canadian housing never became as over-extended as U.S. housing, and the Canadian bank bailout was correspondingly smaller, with none of the banks facing bankruptcy. Canada had a bad zombie problem fifteen years ago from decaying heavy industry, but today those zombies are long gone and the Canadian economy is resilient. The most recent bankruptcy, Nortel Networks Corp. (OTC: NRTLQ) in Jan. 2009, is being handled in a thoroughly market-oriented fashion, with its assets being sold off piecemeal. So your money is safe in Canada – lots of snow, but no zombies!

Source: Why You Need to Look at these Three ‘Zombie-Free Zones’

For starters, Intel beat second-quarter earnings estimates by 10 cents a share, as its revenue climbed 12% year-over-year to $8 billion.  Beating earnings estimates is important, but beating on the top line and showing sales growth is even more important in a recession. The reason: It shows that you can do well in spite of a weak economy.

Like most chip stocks, Intel is an economic leading indicator of sorts – a fact that bodes well for the U.S. recovery. Intel said demand actually strengthened as the quarter moved along.  This is the precursor of a much more vigorous third and fourth quarter, which traditionally is when tech companies perform the best.

Adding more fuel to the fire, Intel increased it sales forecast to $9 billion from $8.5 billion and boosted the outlook for its gross margins to the upper end of the 53%-55% range.

One of the big reasons for Intel’s recent progress has been the launch of  Microsoft Corp.’s (Nasdaq: MSFT) Windows 7, which has been well received by many analysts.  Upgrading to Windows 7 from Vista in an existing machine is quite a task. It requires erasing the hard disk and installing the new operating system and all the other software from scratch.

This is different from the traditional incremental upgrades, in which many of the older files remained in place, while the upgrade took care of overwriting and deleting the unnecessary old system files and installing the new ones.  For small companies that have outdated technology, this process is too tedious and it is much more expedient to buy new machines with the new operating system preinstalled.

And there are a lot of old machines with outdated software out there in the business world.  It is not uncommon to see five-year old machines that are not capable of running new resource-intensive applications.  To verify my analysis, I called friends in Fortune 500 companies that manage PCs for their own corporations or for top technology vendors.

The feedback was unanimous in that Vista’s complexity – despite its significant features that were attractive to some specific users – made the operating system an overall disappointment to companies.  The operating system lacked the desired stability and increased maintenance costs.  So the consensus was that corporations would be quick to abandon Vista for Windows 7.

And given the complexity in upgrading existing Vista systems, and the old age of the equipment, it makes sense that many companies would seek to replace entire machines altogether.  So we have the old the “Wintel” symbiosis kicking into high gear.

Also, corporations have cut personnel deeply and need to increase the productivity of their now-overburdened workforce.  Some 70% of employees are not satisfied with their current position, given the additional stress and lack of additional pay.  Therefore, upgrading their technology to make their jobs easier is a high priority.

This won’t be too difficult, because companies’ profits have actually grown 23% in the last two quarters.  With Corporate America now having recapitalized, a new technological wave makes all the sense in the world.

Thus, the argument that the demand pickup is just filling the chain and inventory rebuilding, and that we will be disappointed come January does not seem to hold.  In either case, you will see an outperformance of earnings come the next report, so we should use any downdraft to get into Intel stock.

Also, Intel has regained its technological leadership against Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (NYSE: AMD), despite that fact that AMD is doing well in areas where integrated graphics are important, finally leveraging its acquisition of ATI.

With all cylinders firing, Intel is poised to deliver an upside earnings surprise in the third quarter and blow through estimates in the fourth quarter.  Valuation is cheap compared to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, considering the rate of growth that Intel is experiencing and expected to deliver both in the short term and well into next year as Windows 7 deployment motivates sales.

The stock is clearly above the 200-day moving average and seems a bit overbought short term.  So do not chase it. But start buying right away, looking to average down over the next 45 days if possible, averaging up until you reach your full position if it keeps running.

Recommendation: Buy Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC) by averaging into the stock over the next 45 days, thus reducing market risk (**).

(**) – Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in Intel Corp.

Source:  Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC) Is Poised to Top Estimates Over the Next Two Quarters