And in his first installment of a new series, he shows you exactly how you can do that with low-minimum mutual funds.

Just this week, a friend told me that he wanted to jump-start his long-neglected saving-and-investing efforts, but was worried it wouldn’t be possible on his current household budget.

I’d be willing to bet that a lot of folks are asking that very same question right now.

I mean, let’s face it: Everyone knows how important it is to save money. But in the middle of what may well be the worst U.S. financial crisis since the Great Depression, finding the cash to create an emergency fund – or to invest in a mutual fund that requires a $10,000 initial outlay – can appear so daunting that many investors decide to not even bother.

Don’t that same mistake.

There’s an option: Mutual funds with a low initial investment threshold. We all know, for example, that Vanguard Wellington (VWELX) is a great fund – indeed, it’s a favorite of Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald – but here in the depths of a financial crisis, not everyone has the $10,000 in cash needed to become a new shareholder.

The upshot: Unfortunately, a lot of folks stop right there, and don’t bother to jump-start their saving-and-investing program.

Don’t that same mistake.

When a Small Start is a Good Start

One way around is to seek mutual funds that allow investors to start with either a very small initial investment – or with no initial investment at all (provided you’re willing to let the fund company take $50 or $100 a month directly out of your checking or savings account).

This approach has a couple of advantages, Money Morning’s Fitz-Gerald says:

• First, it induces you to keep investing, even in a bad market, which history shows is a key element of better long-term results.
• Second, by taking advantage of the electronic-investing option many fund companies offer, you’re investing consistently – for instance, investing the same amount of money on the same day each month.
• Third, for the ultra-cautious the lower investment thresholds can serve as a de facto risk-management tool, since it means that you’re putting less money at risk in the market at a time when the market is uncertain (although, at the same time, you’re still investing).

“It’s a way to insure that you continue to invest, even when the markets stink,” Fitz-Gerald says. “If you are gun-shy, and don’t really want to put a lot of cash at risk, this is a good way to continue your forward-investing momentum, to continue even when the markets aren’t optimum.”
Where do you look for funds like this?

One good place to start your search is with Morningstar, the noted financial-products researcher. For some help, we turned to Morningstar.com’s handy mutual fund screener. And here’s what we did. We looked for funds with an initial purchase of $500 or less. Not wanting big chunks of our capital to for sales commissions, we set the “load” status to “No-Load Funds Only.” And we opted for low-expense offerings, meaning we screened for funds featuring expense ratios of 1.00% or less.

Wanting to cull this further – and to hopefully end up with the “best-in-breed” funds – we limited our search to funds that were rated as “five-star” products by Morningstar. Lastly, since we’re looking chiefly as equity funds in this exercise, we ran one screen for domestic stock funds and another for international stock funds.

We ended up with 23 funds in the domestic-stock category and 16 funds in the international stock category.

What this demonstrates is “that there are quality funds out there,” even for investors who have smaller amounts to invest, Fitz-Gerald says.

Morningstar’s mutual fund screening program – which is free – allows for investors to include other parameters, too, including those for risk, returns, portfolio turnover, and management tenure. We were attempting to keep it simple to show what’s possible, and also figured you’d want to do some of your own research to find funds that match your personal financial needs. The program can also screen for bond funds. One task it does not perform is to identify which of the funds are close to new investors.

Go Global or Get Left Behind

The Money Morning graphic shows the results of our search for International stock funds – and for a good reason. As regular readers of Money Morning know, we believe a global investing strategy is key to any investor’s long-term success. Unfortunately, too many investors de-emphasize the international or global elements of their portfolio, believing that domestic investments are less risky.

There are many different kinds of risk, however – including the risk of getting left behind. Long-term, most of the growth that’s expected in the decades to come will be outside U.S. borders.

If you want proof, just ask the World Bank.

• Today, the United States and Asia each account for 28% of the worldwide economy. Combined, that’s a total of 56%.
• Twenty-five years from now, America’s share of the global economic pie will have slipped to 24%. But Asia’s will have soared to 55%.

In short, in slightly more than two decades, Asia will be twice the economic powerhouse that the United States is today.
It’s true that a number of overseas markets have been problem-plagued in recent months. But that’s just a short-term problem. And as the World Bank statistics demonstrate, the long-term outlook for growth outside the U.S. borders is exceptionally strong.

By focusing only on U.S. stocks, you’ll be looking at only a quarter of the world’s investment opportunities. You’ll miss out on some of the world’s fastest-growing markets. And you’ll get left behind.

The greatest growth will come from China, India and the newly capitalist economies of Eastern and Southern Asia. There may be some other growth areas, such as resource-rich Latin America.

Famed Wharton Business School Professor Jeremy Siegel recently pronounced that the long-held conventional wisdom on international investing should be thrown out the window. For decades, we’ve heard over and over how international investments should comprise 5%, 10% or at most 15% of our portfolio’s total value. Any more than that is foolhardy and risky, we were programmed to believe.

According to Siegel, however, the truly foolhardy act is to limit our international exposure that much. In other words, the biggest risk U.S. investors now face isn’t just the possibility of losses incurred when some foreign market plunges. The real risk now is the possibility that U.S. investors face – getting left behind financially because of all the growth that’s expected to be generated beyond U.S. borders.

Investment advisors who stick with the old asset-allocation model are actually doing their clients a huge disservice, Siegel says.

Siegel now believes that international investments should comprise about 40% of your total holdings. Most individual investors know Siegel for his best-selling book, Stocks for the Long Run: The Definitive Guide to Financial Market Returns and Long-Term Investment Strategies. The book first came out in 1994, and is considered one of a handful of “must-read’ titles in investing finance. The new edition, which appeared in November 2007, includes a long addition addressing the international arena, and how investors must adapt their strategies to the new realities of globalization.

The nation’s wealthy already really understand what’s at stake and are already profiting from these trends – and in a big way. According to a 2007 study by the Spectrem Group, 40% of affluent U.S. households are continuing to invest internationally, while a full one-third are actually planning to invest more. Their chief country of choice when it comes to investing abroad: China.

Other Options

For cash-challenged investors who want to capitalize on China’s growth, there is a solid option – the China Region Opportunities Fund (USCOX), which is operated by the San Antonio, Texas-based U.S. Global Investors Inc. (GROW). As it does with most of its funds, U.S. Global offers interested China fund investors its trademarked “ABC Investment Plan,” which permits investors to make a $100 initial investment and subsequent monthly investments of $30 a month, so long as the new shareholder consents to an automated electronic transfer. You can even tell the company which day of the month you want the money to be invested.

A number of other companies offer similar programs, which are known in the industry as “automated investment plans,” or AIPs. One other company known for operating quality funds is the Baltimore-based T. Rowe Price Group Inc. (TROW), a firm I covered during my time as a business journalist. With most of its funds, the minimum initial investment is waived as long as you agree to have at least $50 a month per fund automatically transferred from your checking account and invested. That arrangement must be maintained until you reach the specified minimums to avoid any extraneous fees.

(One point worthy of note: When my wife and I bought our house nearly nine years ago, the down payment came from two T. Rowe Price funds that I’d built up over a couple of years solely through AIP investments).

Here’s a list of T. Rowe Price funds of all types that are ranked four and five stars by Morningstar.

One final note about low-initial investment funds: This is a great way to get you started back on the savings pathway. At some point, however, you’ll likely want to either add funds or boost your regular investment total to start amassing capital.

“One thing that investors too often don’t understand: You never want to stop investing altogether,” says Money Morning’s Fitz-Gerald. “Even if it’s only a couple of bucks here and there. History shows that those who continue to invest through thick and thin are those who generate the best returns.”

At least, however, this strategy is a great way to get you started back on the savings pathway. At some point, however, you’ll likely want to either add funds or boost your regular investment total to start amassing capital.

Source: Mutual Funds With Low Minimums Can Put Investors Back on the Winning Path

Editor’s Note: This is the first installment of a new series that will explore sound strategies for investing during the ongoing financial crisis.

William says every successful investor needs a China investing strategy, despite the fact that China’s benchmark index, the Shanghai stock index, is down 56% so far this year.

Following Jim Rogers’ bullish comments on China in a recent exclusive interview with Money Morning, Bill gives six reasons to invest in China and five solid China profit plays.

In an exclusive interview with Money Morning, global investing guru Jim Rogers said that giving up on that country now would be like selling all your U.S. stocks at the start of the 1900s – before America created massive wealth by evolving into a world superpower.

“I have never sold any of my Chinese companies,” Rogers said. “You know, selling China in 2008 is like selling America in 1908. Sure, let’s say the market goes down another 40% – so what! You look back over 100 years, you look back from the beauty of 1928, or even 1938 [in the depths of the Great Depression], and there is somebody who bought shares in 1908. He was still a lot better off having not sold in 1908.”

Even if the U.S. economy skids into a recession, China’s long-term growth outlook remains strong – and that’s after nearly 30 years of double-digit growth that country has already logged.

Here are some of the key points – as well as some profit plays – to consider:

First, China remains one of the strongest economies in the world. Even after China reduced its growth outlook, the country remains on track for an economic expansion of better than 9% for the year to come. We aren’t so naïve as to expect a straight path of uninterrupted growth. But neither do we expect a U.S. downturn to squelch the Red Dragon’s long-term growth prospects.

For broad exposure to China’s growth, consider the China Region Opportunity Fund (USCOX), managed by the San Antonio-based U.S. Global Investors Inc. (GROW).

Second, China remains awash in liquidity, with $1.68 trillion in foreign reserves. And much of that excess capital is being focused on the upside, particularly when it comes to boosting disposable income and then building brand awareness for its own products.

And now that liquidity is allowing the country to go on a global shopping spree, enabling its companies and its state-run sovereign wealth funds to pick up such choice assets at bargain prices. One beneficiary of such outside capital: Companies such as MGM Mirage (MGM), which is being positioned as a high-profit play on China.

Third, China’s markets are quickly becoming much “narrower.” Money is being reallocated from highly risky ventures into more-predictable enterprises. That’s an important trend for investors to track, for history shows time and again that these more-predictable ventures fare the best during uncertain, volatility-laced markets. One advantage that these companies have, believe it or not, is that they don’t have to tap into the credit markets at a time when credit is costly, or not available at all. Weaker companies won’t be able to get financing, even if it is available. Consider such potential “New Dragon” companies as online media player SINA Corp. (SINA) or fast-growing advertising play Focus Media Holding Ltd. (ADR: FMCN), for instance. As the economy becomes more “normalized,” consumers will increasingly need such products as insurance, so take a look at China Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (ADR: LFC).

Fourth, many of China’s companies are now reporting real profits. For decades, most Chinese companies operated on the slimmest of margins, with profits that were actually based on taxes or export-incentive “loopholes.” They were kept on life support with an endless stream of bank loans. All of this is being eradicated by Beijing. Money is being taken out of highly risky ventures, or the uncompetitive, state-run enterprises that are ridden with debt. In China, that capital is now being redeployed into the innovative, more-promising ventures that we refer to as the “New Dragons” – many of which are destined to rival the U.S.-based “Global Titans” as the dominant global brands and investor stalwarts of tomorrow. One New Dragon that’s already making a global splash is solar-energy player First Solar Inc. (FSLR). Also consider Huaneng Power International Inc. (ADR: HNP), the domestic China power producer that’s also getting involved in projects outside its home market.

Fifth, the still-weak U.S. greenback will make brand-name imports (both products and services) even more popular in China. And rapidly growing consumer income will give China’s consumers the cash to spend on such one-time luxuries as travel and tourism. One big beneficiary: The Boeing Co. (BA) of the United States, which says that China and other Asian nations will need $340 billion worth of new aircraft over the next two decades.

Sixth, look for companies that generate revenue “from” China, even if they’re not based “in” China. This is a great risk-management strategy: It’s a way for investors to profit from China, while enjoying the investor protections and regulatory oversight of such developed markets as the United States and Europe. The Global Titans are our No. 1 choice here. Many pay a dividend, as well.

If you’re seeking some solid, specific picks, some of the best ones to consider include PepsiCo Inc. (PEP), Diageo PLC (DEO), Yum! Brands Inc. (YUM), McDonald’s Corp. (MCD), The Coca-Cola Co. (KO), and a few others.

The bottom line is this: These days, and forever more, every investor has to have a China investing strategy. And while choosing to sit on the sidelines certainly qualifies as a strategy, remember this: Over the long haul, it’s probably not a profitable plan to follow.

P.S. The first part of this two-part story, Why Every Investor Should Have a China Investment Strategy, appeared in the Aug. 8 issue of Money Morning.

Source: How to Profit From A China Investing Strategy

And history shows that such periods can be the worst for investors to navigate – especially when they follow a record stock-market run, such as the all-time-highs that U.S. share prices reached last fall.

In the United States, for instance, Dow Jones Industrial Average hit 381 on Sept. 3, 1929, a record pinnacle achieved in advance of both the Great Crash and the Great Depression that followed – and a level that wouldn’t be eclipsed again until November 1954 – more than 25 years later.

From the Great Crash, fast-forward 60 years, to 1989 Japan. On Dec. 29 of that year, the Nikkei 225 Index topped out at 38,957.44, before closing at 38,915.87. By the following September, stock prices had nearly been halved – and there was still much more bloodletting to go. (Despite several subsequent rallies up over the 20,000 threshold, the Nikkei ultimately bottomed at 7,830 in April 2003. It closed yesterday – Thursday – at 12,887.95, still down 67% from its trading high 19 years ago).

The fallout from Japan’s slow motion, stock-and-real-estate-market meltdowns was incredible. By early 2004, Japanese houses were selling at 1/10th their peak value, and commercial real estate was selling for less than 1/100th of its record highs. All told, an estimated $20 trillion in stock and real estate wealth was vaporized (although one could easily argue that the peak values weren’t real to start with).

That’s scary stuff, especially because many experts fear the U.S. version of the Lost Decade that’s to follow could be much worse. After all, the U.S. financial crisis is much, much bigger, and the resultant malaise is arguably going to take much longer to work through.

Let’s look at some of the some of the profit plays that will allow investors to sidestep a long U.S. slumber – and profit just the same.

1. Miss the Market Meltdown: The Dow closed at an all-time record high of 14,164.53 on Oct. 9 of last year. With yesterday’s 207-point rally, the Dow closed at 11,446.66 – leaving the 30-stock blue-chip index down 19% from the October record, leaving it right on the doorstep of a bear market.

But what if things were to get much worse? For the Dow to match the Nikkei’s wrenching decline of 67%, it would have to drop all the way down to 4,574.29 – an area it hasn’t seen since the first half of the 1990s.

Will the Dow drop that much? Probably not.

But it doesn’t hurt to hedge. That brings me to a key point: There’s a big difference between “diversification,” which most individual investors equate with “protection,” and actual “hedging,” which is part of an investment-protection package that professional traders employ. If we believe a market poised for a real fall, we want to hedge and find an investment that’s going to go up in value while everything else is going down.

For us, that investment is the Rydex Inverse S&P 500 Strategy Fund (RYURX). RYDEX URSA is a so-called “inverse fund” that’s designed to profit as the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index declines in value. In that way, it complements our other holdings by providing some portfolio stability.

As Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald says, hedging is such a compelling strategy because financial studies demonstrate that “even though broad sections of the markets may decline over time and our portfolios with it, we need only have a small section permanently hedged at any given time. The reason is that, by having a small portion of our assets (5%-10% or less) earning above-average returns, our overall returns are far higher over time.”

2. Gold Isn’t Just for Hedging Anymore: Mention the word “stagflation” to anyone who worked and invested during the 1970s, and I’ll bet you’ll actually see that person physically shudder at the memory. Stagflation – the double-whammy combination of stagnant economic growth and high inflation – was thought to be an impossibility, until it showed up during that decade, leaving ruin in its wake.

But for our purposes, no matter whether we’re looking at stagflation or inflation, one thing is clear – we’re looking at higher prices. And when prices are on the upswing, gold is the one investment you certainly want to own.

Then there’s also the whole “Lost Decade” outlook for the U.S. economy. In a misguided attempt to slowly deflate the asset bubbles it created with a years of overly expansive monetary policies, the U.S. Federal Reserve is now keeping interest rates at artificially low levels – gambling it will still be able to launch a successful counterattack on inflation later on. What’s more, the central bank also has made the ill-fated decision to diversify into the “bailout business” with its intervention in the Bear Stearns Cos. (BSC) and Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) debacles.

The artificially low interest rates will continue to punish the U.S. greenback, sending it lower and causing inflation to accelerate. And the trillions in debt the U.S. government’s balance sheet will take on from the Fannie and Freddie bailouts certainly won’t help.

In addition to the bleak-sounding inflation-case for gold, there’s also what I like to call the “wealth case” for the “yellow metal.” As the consumer classes in China, India, Latin America and Emerging Europe grow in both breadth and depth, their ability to buy luxury goods will finally intersect with their desire. And gold will be a major beneficiary.

But how best to play it? There are mining companies, bullion, coins and even jewelry. Everybody has his or her preferences for gold investments, including us. We prefer the SPDR Gold Trust Exchange Traded Fund (GLD). There’s no delivery risk, it’s liquid, and you can buy and sell easily through any online brokerage.

What’s tipping us off? The so-called Price/Earnings-to- Growth ratio, better known to investors as the “PEG” ratio.

Let me explain …

One of the most popular stock valuations is the Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio. If you take that calculation one step further and include a stock’s expected growth rate you hit on the P/E-to-growth ratio, or PEG ratio.

Analysts have been using PEG ratios for years, now, to pick undervalued stocks, but now you also can use that same ratio to determine which countries are trading at good value.

A recent Bespoke Investment Group report used the popular PEG ratio to identify which country’s stocks are currently undervalued.

“Late last year, we began performing this analysis on countries to get a better comparison of the valuations of both developed and emerging markets,” the B.I.G. Tips report read. “To do this, we divide the country’s [gross domestic product] growth estimate into the estimated P/E ratio of its major stock market index.”

Like an individual security’s PEG ratio, the lower the ratio, the more undervalued the stock.

The top-three spots on that list go to Russia (1.37), China (1.91) and India (2.06). Brazil clocks in at sixth with 2.80. Money Morning readers may recognize them as member of the “BRIC” nations – a term coined by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) in 2003 identifying rapidly growing emerging economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China). [For a complete listing of the PEG ratios of the respective countries, please see the chart below.]

Rounding out the top six are Malaysia (2.37) and South Korea (2.66), the latter of which is another investing favorite of both Money Morning and Warren Buffett, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.A, BRK.B).

The United States, on the other hand, comes in near the bottom with an estimated PEG ratio for 2008 of 11.39.

When using the calculations to make investment picks, it’s important to remember that both the P/E ratio and the 2008 GDP growth are only estimates. Still, it’s easy to see how fast-growing economies have the leg up on more mature markets such as Japan and the United States.

How to Play the PEG for Profits

One of the easiest ways for U.S. investors to cash in on a foreign country’s expected stock market growth is with an American-listed exchange-traded fund (ETF) or exchange-traded note (ETN) that mirrors a foreign stock market index.

For the BRICs, you could try the iShares MSCI Brazil Index (EWZ), the Market Vector Russia ETF Trust (RSX), the Barclays IPath India Index ETN (INP), or the iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (FXI).

If you prefer to stick to individual securities:

Russia: OAO Gazprom (OTC: OGZPY), the state-owned natural gas monopoly with ambitions to control Western Europe’s gas supplies.

Lukoil (OTC: LUKOY), the other obvious Russian heavyweight, is the largest state-controlled oil company.

China: A terrific way to play China is with the Region Opportunity Fund (USCOX), a mutual fund run by San Antonio-based U.S. Global Investors Inc. (GROW). Indeed, U.S. Global, itself, is a pretty good play on international growth. It manages some of the best emerging-market funds, and natural-resources funds, in the business. As global growth fuels global investments – and it will – U.S. global will see more money pour into its funds, boosting the management fees it collects, as well as its profits and stock price.

India: One of India’s titans is Tata Motors Ltd. (TTM), which recently sealed both ends of the consumer automotive spectrum with its forthcoming $2,500 Nano and its recent $2.3 billion acquisition of the Jaguar and Land Rover brands.

Another is option could be the pharmaceutical company Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. (RDY). As many U.S. pharmaceutical patents expire in the next five years, this major generic-drugs manufacturer can expect to benefit.

South Korea: Back in October 2007, Buffett took a 4% stake in this country’s Number One steelmaker, POSCO Ltd. (PKX). Studies have shown that following Buffett’s investment moves, even months after the fact can be the pathway to profits.

Brazil: Companhia Vale do Rio Doce, now referred to only as Vale (RIO), is an iron-ore company with ancillary operations in gold, nickel, copper and other metals. It’s one of the true global blue chips, with a market capitalization of almost $200 billion.

Another Brazilian firm worth a look is Petrobras (PBR). It’s one of the few emerging market oil companies with access to modern technology – and the willingness to work with the oil majors.

Source: Popular Stock Indicator Tells Investors to Hit the BRICs