<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; VG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/vg/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cash Tours the Dark Side</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/cash-tours-the-dark-side/1858</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/cash-tours-the-dark-side/1858#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justice Litle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CROX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/cash-tours-the-dark-side/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello  again, sir. Looks like you’ve still got your finger on the pulse of this market.  Now that I’ve learned to keep an eye out for it, I see three different IPOs on  the calendar for this week.</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Don’t  sound too surprised now. Yep, IPO activity is at a good level. But we’re  starting to see the quality deteriorate just a bit.  Nothing too serious &#8212; but it’s something to keep an eye on.</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> Can you  explain the “quality” issue a little more? Does that mean we’re seeing more  duds come to market?</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Right,  that’s part of it. When companies see that optimism is up and liquidity is  flowing, it makes sense for them to try and raise capital while that window is&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello  again, sir. Looks like you’ve still got your finger on the pulse of this market.  Now that I’ve learned to keep an eye out for it, I see three different IPOs on  the calendar for this week.</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Don’t  sound too surprised now. Yep, IPO activity is at a good level. But we’re  starting to see the quality deteriorate just a bit.  Nothing too serious &#8212; but it’s something to keep an eye on.</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> Can you  explain the “quality” issue a little more? Does that mean we’re seeing more  duds come to market?</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Right,  that’s part of it. When companies see that optimism is up and liquidity is  flowing, it makes sense for them to try and raise capital while that window is  open.  Keep in mind that few people  really expect this firm market to continue. So folks are trying to grab what  they can, while they can.</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> Makes  sense. Anything else?</p>
<p><strong>CASH: </strong>In  addition to lower-quality companies, you’re also starting to see smaller  companies tagging along. An example of this is <strong>Real Goods Solar (RSOL)</strong>, a company that’s supposed to price its IPO  this week. Because RSOL is so small &#8212; less than $20 million in revenues &#8212;  they’re unable to attract the all-star underwriters. They have to use  second-tier partners instead.</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> So what  effect will that have on the stock? If they’re small and putting fewer shares  out there, it seems that might benefit the price, right? Keeping supply low to  help the ‘ole S-and-D curve?</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Don’t  forget the other input for that curve&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> Never.  Supply and demand is about the only useful thing I got out of college  economics. So what do you see on the demand side?</p>
<table style="font-size: 90%; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" align="center" border="1" bordercolor="#debe7c" cellpadding="4" width="590">
<tr>
<td>
<table align="center" border="1" bordercolor="#debe7c" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="4" width="590">
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#f2ead7" height="148" width="574"><strong>How to collect $25,000 to $375,00 every year for the rest of your   life! </strong>Drawing on the massive cash reserves of the world’s wealthiest nations, this   $18 trillion Fund could pay you $375,000 per year for the rest of your life.<u><a href="http://www.isecureonline.com/reports/TAI/WTAIJ418/" target="_blank">Follow this link to discover how to get your first check by May   27, 2008&#8230;</a></u></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Nothing.</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> Nothing?</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Nada.  Zip. Zilch. Goose egg. Bagel. The big donut…</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> I got  it, I got it. But what does that mean exactly?</p>
<p><strong>CASH: </strong>It’s  means there’s just no demand &#8212; period.   These underwriters (think names you’ve never heard of, like Equity,  Canaccord Adams, &amp; Broadpoint) don’t have anywhere near the footprint or  the clout that, say, a Goldman Sachs, a Merrill Lynch, or a Morgan Stanley  would bring. And so, while this might be a reasonably strong company with  limited supply of stock, the underwriting machine is weak. They won’t be able  to gin up enough interest for a good price pop.</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> So do  you short a name like this right out of the box?</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Quite  possibly. Although I’m a little uncomfortable being short a thin name in a  hopeful market, even if the hope is fleeting.   But it’s a possibility, and that brings us around to our topic for the  day.</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> Which  is?</p>
<table style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" align="right" border="1" bordercolor="#debe7c" cellpadding="4" width="321">
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#f2ead7" width="305"><em><strong>Previously in the Cash McDash series: </strong></em><strong><a href="http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com/TPG/archives/Daily_042908a.html" target="_blank">Cash Dodges a Bullet</a></strong><a href="http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com/TPG/archives/Daily_042308a.html" target="_blank"><strong>Cash Explains the Options Game</strong></a><strong><a href="http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com/TPG/archives/Daily_041608a.html" target="_blank">Cash Digs Into Potash</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com/TPG/archives/Daily_040808a.html" target="_blank"><strong>Cash Continues to Roll</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>The Beginning: <a href="http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com/TPG/archives/Daily_12908a.html" target="_blank">Introducing Cash McDash</a></strong></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Shorting! Last week I said I’d bring a little balance to our banter. Today I  wanted to give a little clearer picture as to how Cash McDash makes money on  the “dark side.”</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> Sweet,  the dark side! Insert Darth Vader joke here. Can we talk about Jedi mind tricks,  too?</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Let’s  not and say we did.</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> Fair  enough. Where should we begin?</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Well,  there are basically two different categories of short trades that I use. We can  skim over the first and dig a little deeper into the second.</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> Hold on!  We’re just getting into the good stuff and you’re already skimming? Why don’t  we take ‘em one at a time and get some more detail.</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Because the first category of shorting doesn’t quite fit for this type of  conversation. The trades are too specialized… Oftentimes they have to be  executed very quickly, with very little notice, in order to lock in solid  profits. I can tell you “how” that’s done, but if I tried throwing out picks in  that area to a broad audience, it would be more trouble than it’s worth. I’m  more interested in sharing that type of info with a small, select group of  readers who are dead serious about their trading gains.</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> Fair enough.  So give us the Cliffs Notes then.</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Well,  the first way I make money on the short side is by selling underwriting dogs  right from the beginning &#8212; “out of the box,” as you say.  Because I’m so plugged in to that whole  hidden process of taking companies public, I see what most others don’t. I know  whether or not the demand is there, and I can get a very clear read on whether  or not the underwriters have buyers for the stock.</p>
<p><strong>JL: </strong>Hey, so  you’re kind of like that guy Simon Cowell on American Idol or something. Except  you, uh, judge new issues instead of wannabe pop stars.</p>
<p><strong>CASH:</strong> Ugh.  I’d rather be Darth Vader. But, yes, from time to time there are deals that are  just destined to fail. And even although the public can sometimes get excited  over these deals, my behind-the-scenes view makes it exceedingly clear that  money is to be made on the short side.</p>
<p><strong>JL:</strong> How  about an example folks might recognize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/cash-tours-the-dark-side/1858/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.406 seconds -->
