<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; Wealth Protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/wealth-protection/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is 60K a Year Too &#8216;Wealthy&#8217; For Entitlement Benefits?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/is-60k-a-year-too-wealthy-for-entitlement-benefits/17192</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/is-60k-a-year-too-wealthy-for-entitlement-benefits/17192#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian Profits</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes From the Investment Underground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baby Boomers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Trust Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the effects of the current crisis will be severe cuts in entitlement programs for “the wealthy.” MoneyNews.com reports that anyone making more than $60,000 a year will be refused entitlement payments under new proposals from members of Congress.<br />
Baby boomers will feel the brunt of the shortfalls in the Social Security and Medicare trust funds. The so-called “means testing” proposal for entitlements is yet another way of screwing savers and earners in America. The message is clear: if you can afford your retirement on private savings, no entitlement payments for you, even if you put into the system for decades.</p>
<p>Americans have just lost over $10 trillion in wealth in the housing crash, stocks are still about 40% off their&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the effects of the current crisis will be severe cuts in entitlement programs for “the wealthy.” MoneyNews.com reports that anyone making more than $60,000 a year will be refused entitlement payments under new proposals from members of Congress.<span id="more-17192"></span><br />
Baby boomers will feel the brunt of the shortfalls in the Social Security and Medicare trust funds. The so-called “means testing” proposal for entitlements is yet another way of screwing savers and earners in America. The message is clear: if you can afford your retirement on private savings, no entitlement payments for you, even if you put into the system for decades.</p>
<p>Americans have just lost over $10 trillion in wealth in the housing crash, stocks are still about 40% off their highs and there’s a strong likelihood of inflation and higher taxes on the way. This is bad news for anybody interest in protecting their savings and retiring in comfort.</p>
<p>Here at Notes, we have no intention of hanging around and waiting for this onslaught. We are putting together a team of financial and legal experts to head up a wealth protection program for people who don’t intend on surrendering their cash to pay for the clean-up costs of the crisis.</p>
<p>This program will provide top-level money management and tax planning advice. If you’re serious about checking out of the welfare state for good, this program may be for you. We intend to keep the amount of members extremely low. If you’re interested in finding out more, send an email with the subject line “Family Office” to info@contrarianprofits.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/is-60k-a-year-too-wealthy-for-entitlement-benefits/17192/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forbes’ 10 Biggest Losers: 4 Wealth Protection Lessons From Bankrupt Billionaires</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/forbes%e2%80%99-10-biggest-losers-4-wealth-protection-lessons-from-bankrupt-billionaires/15097</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/forbes%e2%80%99-10-biggest-losers-4-wealth-protection-lessons-from-bankrupt-billionaires/15097#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Louis Basenese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlos Slim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbes Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Basenese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, <em>Forbes</em> magazine released its annual list of billionaires. No surprise, the rolls shrank.</p>
<p>“[In 2007], there were 1,125 billionaires. This year, it’s down to 793,” says CEO Steve Forbes.</p>
<p>An <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101777043" target="_blank">NPR broadcast</a> tried to put an optimistic spin on the news suggesting, “All those empty spots… mean more room for the rest of us to move up.” In good fun, it even provided five secrets to do so, based upon the business activities that propelled 38 new billionaires into this year’s rankings.</p>
<p>But in all fairness, I don’t think a single one of us stands a chance of becoming a billionaire in the next year. So let’s put the <em>Forbes</em> list to better use than invoking a fanciful daydream about joining the lifestyles of&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, <em>Forbes</em> magazine released its annual list of billionaires. No surprise, the rolls shrank.<span id="more-15097"></span></p>
<p>“[In 2007], there were 1,125 billionaires. This year, it’s down to 793,” says CEO Steve Forbes.</p>
<p>An <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101777043" target="_blank">NPR broadcast</a> tried to put an optimistic spin on the news suggesting, “All those empty spots… mean more room for the rest of us to move up.” In good fun, it even provided five secrets to do so, based upon the business activities that propelled 38 new billionaires into this year’s rankings.</p>
<p>But in all fairness, I don’t think a single one of us stands a chance of becoming a billionaire in the next year. So let’s put the <em>Forbes</em> list to better use than invoking a fanciful daydream about joining the lifestyles of the rich and famous.</p>
<p>Turns out, by focusing on the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/10/biggest-losers-adelson-buffett-billionaires-2009-billionaires-wealth-loss_slide.html" target="_blank">10 biggest losers</a> &#8211; who lost a combined $238 billion &#8211; the list contains four timeless investing lessons we can put to work immediately to prevent a similar disaster (in relative terms, of course).</p>
<p><strong>Lesson #1: Have an Exit Strategy</strong></p>
<p>While some can argue averaging down &#8211; buying more shares as prices fall to reduce your average cost per share &#8211; is a smart move, it’s stupid if you don’t ever stop. Just ask Carlos Slim Helu. To his detriment, he couldn’t resist buying more of luxury retailer Saks or The New York Times as shares plummeted.</p>
<p>Instead of endlessly throwing good money after bad, cut your losses and move on. It’s hard to do, that’s why we recommend <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2008/August/using-trailing-stops.html" target="_blank">using trailing stops</a>. They take all the emotion out of the decision and provide much needed discipline to exit an investment gone bad… before it gets really bad.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson #2: Don’t Try to Time the Market or Make a Few Big Bets</strong></p>
<p>We know it’s tempting. But even <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/March/warren-buffetts-2008-letter-to-shareholders.html" target="_blank">Warren Buffett</a> can’t do it. He admittedly “did some dumb things.” Atop the list is certainly his decision to plunk down $244 million on ConocoPhillips at the top of the oil market. Trying to make a fortune by placing a few big, well-timed bets is a surefire way to lose a fortune, not make one.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson #3: Use Leverage Sparingly… Or Not at All</strong></p>
<p>Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska needed a $4.5 billion loan from a state-controlled bank to avoid a margin call by Western Banks on his 25% stake in Norilsk Nickel. Other margin calls forced him to raise $2 billion by selling his stakes in Magna International and Hochtief. Leverage might magnify returns on the upside, but don’t forget it does the same thing to losses on the downside. And we’re not as fortunate to have a state-controlled bank to bail us out.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson #4: Asset Allocate</strong></p>
<p>This is akin to our parents telling us to “eat your vegetables.” We know it’s good for us. But that doesn’t mean we necessarily do it. Consider this your annual reminder because without exception, the 10 biggest losers on the <em>Forbes</em> list had almost all their assets in one basket.</p>
<p>Take Anil Ambani for example. His sizeable investment in India’s Reliance companies (Communications, Power and Capital) made him last year’s biggest gainer and this year’s biggest loser, down $32 billion.</p>
<p>Granted, most billionaires can’t simply unwind their biggest investments. In many cases they’re in the business they created and they need to retain a large stake to stay in control.</p>
<p>But we can. So if too much of your portfolio is invested in a single investment, it’s time for a change.</p>
<p>If we don’t invest too much (position size) in any one opportunity and spread our investments around widely (<a href="http://www.investmentu.com/asset-allocation-model.html" target="_blank">asset allocate</a>), it’s impossible to be wiped out in one fell swoop.</p>
<p>Yes, protection is that simple. And while it might not be that easy for the world’s billionaires, it is for us. So use it.</p>
<p><a class="post_title" href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/March/forbes-10-biggest-losers.html"><em>Forbes’</em> 10 Biggest Losers: 4 Wealth Protection Lessons From Bankrupt Billionaires</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/forbes%e2%80%99-10-biggest-losers-4-wealth-protection-lessons-from-bankrupt-billionaires/15097/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.180 seconds -->

