<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; William Patalon III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/william-patalon-iii/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Forget About October – September is the Worst Month for U.S. Stocks</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/forget-about-october-%e2%80%93-september-is-the-worst-month-for-us-stocks/20279</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/forget-about-october-%e2%80%93-september-is-the-worst-month-for-us-stocks/20279#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bull market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mizuho Securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWS.A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When the “Great Crash” came in 1929, it came in October. So, too, did the infamous “Crash of ‘87.” And last year, during a tortuous October that led to even lower lows in the months to come, the <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX">Standard &#38; Poor’s 500  Index</a> lost 19% of its value in just 30 days.</p>
<p>Investors can be excused if the word “October” is one that strikes fear into  their hearts.</p>
<p>The trouble is, it’s actually September that deals investors the toughest  monthly hands.</p>
<p>That’s September – as in the month that starts today (Tuesday).</p>
<p>After a rally that’s seen U.S. stocks surge 53% from their March lows  (including 3.5% in August, alone), “<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/wake-me-up-when-september-ends-many-investors-say-2009-08-31">investors  are wondering if September will live up to its reputation</a> as the month in which&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the “Great Crash” came in 1929, it came in October. So, too, did the infamous “Crash of ‘87.” And last year, during a tortuous October that led to even lower lows in the months to come, the <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500  Index</a> lost 19% of its value in just 30 days.<span id="more-20279"></span></p>
<p>Investors can be excused if the word “October” is one that strikes fear into  their hearts.</p>
<p>The trouble is, it’s actually September that deals investors the toughest  monthly hands.</p>
<p>That’s September – as in the month that starts today (Tuesday).</p>
<p>After a rally that’s seen U.S. stocks surge 53% from their March lows  (including 3.5% in August, alone), “<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/wake-me-up-when-september-ends-many-investors-say-2009-08-31">investors  are wondering if September will live up to its reputation</a> as the month in which the S&amp;P 500 posts its worst price performance and frequency of decline,” Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4907797">Standard &amp; Poor’s</a> Equity Research (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMHP">MHP</a>),  told <strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/wake-me-up-when-september-ends-many-investors-say-2009-08-31">MarketWatch.com</a></span></em></strong> yesterday (Monday).</p>
<p>Since 1929, September is actually the worst-performing  months for stocks, with the S&amp;P 500 suffering an average <em>decline </em>of  1.3% (compared to an average monthly <em>advance</em> of 0.5%), Stovall said.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI">Dow  Jones Industrial Average</a> – the index that’s more closely followed by retail investors – tells a similar story. In fact, if you look at the Dow over the last 100, 50 and 20 years, September is the only month in which the average monthly performance has been negative, the <a href="http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/">Bespoke Investment Group</a> concluded in a recent research report.</p>
<p>Over the past 100 years, the Dow has suffered an average decline of 0.96% in September, with a positive month 42% of the time. The average loss widened to 1.23% for the last 50 years and to 1.49% for the past 20.</p>
<p>Fall, in general, hasn’t been kind to investors: Of the 15 largest point declines in the Dow, six have come in October, four in September and two in November (See accompanying graphic).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/downerdays1.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>Given that, investors “may have a reason to fear a setback in September,” Stovall told the news service. “We don’t know whether concerns over the upcoming [third-quarter] earnings reporting season will trigger this anticipated digestion of gains, or if further nervousness emanating from the Chinese stock market over the prospects of a slower-than-expected growth in GDP will cause U.S. equities to trim some of its recent advances, but September is as good a month as any in which to suffer a setback.</p>
<p>Stovall says that Standard &amp; Poor’s investment committee believes that stocks are “are due for a period of consolidation” – Wall Street parlance for a potentially painful drop – before resuming their advance.</p>
<p>Not all Septembers are the same, however, Bespoke Investment’s recent shows.  And this one could be particularly rocky.</p>
<p>When the Dow has a positive August, it does well in September more often than not. But when three specific market criteria are met, history shows that it’s best for investors to fasten their seatbelts, since they’re usually in for a rough September, Bespoke researchers found.</p>
<p>And – unfortunately – all three of those criteria have been met this year.  Those three conditions are:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Dow is in positive territory year-to-date  (+719.89 points, or 8.2%).</li>
<li>The Dow is in positive territory during the past  three months (+995.95 points, or 11.72%).</li>
<li>The Dow is in positive territory in August  (+324.67 points, or 3.54%).</li>
</ul>
<p>Of the 17 times in the past when the Dow has boasted a positive return in all three of those time periods, the index has averaged a 1.73% decline for September, with positive returns for the month just three times. And those three months were each about 20 years apart.</p>
<p>Mark Arbeter, S&amp;P’s chief technical strategist, told <strong><em>MarketWatch</em></strong> that the S&amp;P could fall all the way down to 940 – an 8% decline from the close yesterday (Monday) – before continuing its advance to a fresh recovery high.</p>
<p>Indeed, S&amp;P’s Stovall said that “while past performance is no guarantee of future results, history hints that September certainly has the reputation.”</p>
<p>Not everyone is so bearish, however.</p>
<p>Michael Darda, MKM Partners’ chief economist, this week told <strong><em>Barron’s</em></strong> that the stock market’s strong performance “<a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125149739421467933.html">perhaps [is]  telling us that the idea of a painfully slow U.S. and global economic recovery  is just plain wrong</a>.”</p>
<p>And even if there is a pullback, it could be both shallow and temporary – because of the huge cache of cash on the sidelines. While it’s true that a record $327 billion in cash has flowed out of money-market mutual funds since March 11, that still leaves $3.58 trillion – down from the high of $3.92 trillion, but equal to 34% of the U.S. stock market’s total capitalization, <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=TYO:8606">Mizuho Securities Co. Ltd</a>.  Chief Investment Strategist Carmine Grigoli told <strong><em>Barron’s</em></strong>.</p>
<p>In 2002, when the last bull-market run began, money market cash equaled 29% of the stock market’s total capitalization. And it’s nearly double the 19% ratio that was present at the 2007 stock market peak, Grigoli told the closely watched <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=5645566">Dow Jones</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ANWSA">NWSA</a>)  investment weekly.</p>
<p>And back then, the U.S. central bank wasn’t holding the benchmark Fed Funds  rate at a historic low of roughly 0%.</p>
<p>Because cash earns almost nothing today, “as financial conditions improve and fear subsides, sideline cash is drawn into higher-risk instruments such as bonds and stocks,” Grigoli told <strong><em>Barron’s</em></strong>. That’s why we’re in  “the early stages of a liquidity-driven bull market that could take stock  prices substantially higher.”</p>
<p>After we navigate September, that is.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/09/01/worst-month-for-stocks/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/09/01/worst-month-for-stocks/">Source: Forget About October – September is the Worst Month for U.S. Stocks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/forget-about-october-%e2%80%93-september-is-the-worst-month-for-us-stocks/20279/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soaring Prices for AIG, Fannie and Other Financial Stocks Sending Mixed Messages to Investors</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/soaring-prices-for-aig-fannie-and-other-financial-stocks-sending-mixed-messages-to-investors/20240</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/soaring-prices-for-aig-fannie-and-other-financial-stocks-sending-mixed-messages-to-investors/20240#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DELL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAHMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTLQQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xlf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>Three of the financial institutions that were key catalysts to the global financial crisis – and that owe the federal government billions of dollars as a direct result of those problems – have seen their shares <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/aig-fannie-freddie-shares-have-tripled-in-august-2009-08-28" target="_blank">triple in price</a> so far this month.</p>
<p>That could signal that a big rebound in bank-sector earnings is just around the corner. Or it could be merely a speculative “short squeeze” that all but confirms that these stocks are basically worthless.</p>
<p>Shares of busted insurer<strong> American International Group Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=aig" target="_blank">AIG</a>)</strong> have soared from $13.14 to $50.23, as of Friday’s close, a gain of 282.3% so far this month. Shares of mortgage giants <strong>Freddie Mac (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=fre" target="_blank">FRE</a>)</strong> and <strong>Fannie Mae (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=fnm" target="_blank">FNM</a>) </strong>posted similar gains,<strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em></strong> reported. Fannie’s shares advanced from 58 cents to $2.04, an increase of&#8230;</p></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>Three of the financial institutions that were key catalysts to the global financial crisis – and that owe the federal government billions of dollars as a direct result of those problems – have seen their shares <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/aig-fannie-freddie-shares-have-tripled-in-august-2009-08-28" target="_blank">triple in price</a> so far this month.<span id="more-20240"></span></p>
<p>That could signal that a big rebound in bank-sector earnings is just around the corner. Or it could be merely a speculative “short squeeze” that all but confirms that these stocks are basically worthless.</p>
<p>Shares of busted insurer<strong> American International Group Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=aig" target="_blank">AIG</a>)</strong> have soared from $13.14 to $50.23, as of Friday’s close, a gain of 282.3% so far this month. Shares of mortgage giants <strong>Freddie Mac (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=fre" target="_blank">FRE</a>)</strong> and <strong>Fannie Mae (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=fnm" target="_blank">FNM</a>) </strong>posted similar gains,<strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em></strong> reported. Fannie’s shares advanced from 58 cents to $2.04, an increase of 251.7%. Freddie’s shares zoomed from 62 cents to $2.40 each, a gain of 287.1%.</p>
<p>AIG actually gained for a ninth straight day Friday, reaching a 10-month high, as short-shelling speculators got squeezed and were forced to buy back the shares they’d sold short, traders told <strong><em>MarketWatch.</em></strong> AIG has 21% of its “float” – shares available to the public sold short, the sixth-highest proportion in the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=SPX%3AIND" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500 Index</a>, according to<strong><em>Bloomberg News.</em></strong></p>
<p>But the gains might also sign that the banking sector is poised for a major profit rebound, according to some new analyst research.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dating back to 1995, bank-sector outperformance has typically preceded [earnings-per-share] growth outperformance by one to two quarters,&#8221; <strong>Stifel Nicolaus &amp; Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASF" target="_blank">SN</a>)</strong> analysts wrote in a market-research note last week. “With sector earnings growth expected to exceed that of the general market in mid-2010, we question whether we will see another leg down in this rally before year-end. On the other hand, perhaps we should question the current growth expectations for the sector?”</p>
<p>Trading in financial-services stocks has dominated the stock-market volume this month. So-called “day traders” have gravitated to once-questionable financial stocks and helped fuel those stunning gains – and huge volumes.</p>
<p><strong>Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AC" target="_blank">C</a>),</strong> for instance, has seen daily trading volume topping 1 billion shares this week. The stock closed above $5.05 on Thursday and $5.23 on Friday. That represents a 439% gain from its 52-week low of 97 cents a share.</p>
<p>Financial stocks have led the market’s slingshot higher from the early March lows. Trading has been fierce in beaten-down shares of some companies that participated in the bailout, such as AIG, Citi and <strong>Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC" target="_blank">BAC</a>).</strong></p>
<p>The New York-based AIG is trying to sell assets to repay government loans after accepting $182.5 billion in U.S. bailout money. AIG recently reported a profit for its second quarter – after having posted six straight quarters in the red. It engineered a so-called “reverse stock split,” in which AIG gave investors one new share for every 20 they turned in. The company did this to avoid a delisting action. That enhanced the short squeeze, since there were fewer shares available to for short-sellers to repurchase and “cover” their bets.</p>
<p>Despite the torrid run that AIG’s shares have been on, the insurance company’s bonds still trade at levels indicating the company’s shares may be worthless, Peter Boockvar, an equity strategist at Miller Tabak &amp; Co., told <strong><em>Bloomberg</em></strong>.</p>
<p>“The value of the company is still the same,” Boockvar said. “AIG bonds tell you that the equity is possibly worth nothing and that they may not be able to pay back the government.”</p>
<p>AIG’s $3.24 billion of 8.25% bonds due in 2018 are quoted at 79 cents on the dollar, to yield 12.2%, <strong><em>Bloomberg</em></strong> reported. The insurer’s $4 billion of 8.175% percent bonds due in 2058 are quoted at 49.5 cents on the dollar to yield 16.7% <strong><em>Bloomberg</em></strong> said.</p>
<p><strong>The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=xlf" target="_blank">XLF</a>)</strong>, an ETF tracking the financial stocks in the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500 Index</a>,</strong> has rallied nearly 30% over the past three months and handily outpaced the market.</p>
<h3>Market Matters</h3>
<p>While the past few months have been anything but dull for the markets (euphoric may be more appropriate), investors enjoyed a few slow days of peace and quiet.</p>
<p>Another stimulus program came to a close as “Cash for Clunkers” ended with a last-minute flurry of activity.  Analysts claimed that more than 700,000 cars were bought over the past month and August auto sales should rise on a year-over-year basis for the first time since mid-2007.</p>
<p>While dealerships enjoyed a nice rebound in activity (even if just temporarily), banks continued to experience challenges as the <strong>Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC)</strong>reported that 416 institutions were on its “problem” list at the end of the second quarter, up from 305 on March 31, and also conceded that its insurance-fund reserves were dwindling.</p>
<p><strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:GS&amp;ei=17GaSrzRCpGmMMKtuLYF&amp;usg=AFQjCNHI-fKbpWoy3DJkbmBk4GMoLKhYeg&amp;sig2=9k3Wm7lIXMh2wpfAK0OXWg" target="_blank">GS</a>) w</strong>as in the news again as controversy has continued to surround the investment giant since the <strong>AIG </strong>bailout and <strong>Lehman</strong><strong>Brothers Holdings Inc. (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:LEHMQ&amp;ei=BLKaSo-rA4GCNJr3wKYF&amp;usg=AFQjCNFJyGHwSniZjt-hNH3ILjOkbJRIBQ&amp;sig2=pFMfOL4y2KKQSD9B7KlWKw" target="_blank">LEHMQ</a>)</strong> failures.  Regulators are investigating its weekly “trading huddles,” where its analysts allegedly gave short-term stock tips to select clients and traders, though most other customers were not privy to such insight.</p>
<p><strong>Dell Corp</strong><strong>. (Nasdaq:<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:DELL&amp;ei=K7KaSpSOEoLSNZXxqKMF&amp;usg=AFQjCNHxjKEpakGoTXp-6WIw3OT8PFBzIQ&amp;sig2=e-MvEc8Vm27Bqrlf1TgmIg" target="_blank"> DELL</a>)</strong> posted lower quarterly profits, though<br />
the result still beat Street expectations and management projected stronger performance in 2010 when businesses get back in technology buying mode.  <strong>Intel</strong> <strong>Corp. (Nasdaq:<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:INTC&amp;ei=SLKaSpS-IpOuMOW9qLYB&amp;usg=AFQjCNHnwU95Euy3mesOVD6I26J5rKXeww&amp;sig2=_-B3rXPuYfNKZm8LAdLg-A" target="_blank"> INTC</a>)</strong> boosted its revenue projections for the next few months, another sign that chip demand is increasing and the business climate continues to improve.</p>
<p>The <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> roared to eight straight days of higher closes, before hitting a stumbling block on Friday (though no one may have noticed as volume was so light) and the days of triple-digit moves ended (for a week at least).</p>
<p>The other indexes traded relatively flat during the week and even the positive news from Intel did little to generate any investor enthusiasm in the tech-heavy <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq Composite Index</a></strong>. Fixed income fared better than most would have expected, considering another $109 billion in government debt hit the street.</p>
<p>Oil surged to a 10-month high before a larger-than-expected inventory report indicated that crude demand remained weak despite expectations of an economic recovery just around the corner.  In fact, natural gas plunged to a seven-year low.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="438" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="62" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="67" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (06/30/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(08/21/09)</strong></td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(08/28/09)</strong></td>
<td width="76" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="62" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="67" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,447.00</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">9,505.96<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">9,544.20</p>
</td>
<td width="76" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+8.75%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="62" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="67" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,835.04</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,020.90<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,028.77</p>
</td>
<td width="76" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+28.64%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="62" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="67" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">919.32</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,026.13<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,028.93</p>
</td>
<td width="76" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+13.91%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="62" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="67" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">508.28</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">581.51<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>579.86</strong><strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="76" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+16.10%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="62" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="67" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,629.31<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,819.50<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,841.91</p>
</td>
<td width="76" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+20.69%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="62" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="67" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="76" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="62" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="67" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.52%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.56%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.45%</p>
</td>
<td width="76" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+121 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Economically Speaking</h3>
<p>In perhaps the biggest news of the week, U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke will manage to avoid becoming a part of the so-called “jobless recovery” when he was nominated for another term as central bank chair by U.S. President Barack Obama.</p>
<p>While Bernanke certainly has his critics among grandstanding politicos from both sides of the aisle, few Fed watchers expect Congress to hold up his confirmation.  For now, continuity seems to be the best thing.</p>
<p>The economic data of the week was relatively favorable with signs of renewed strength in both housing and manufacturing.  New home sales jumped for the fourth consecutive month and the S&amp;P Case-Shiller Index even depicted higher home prices last quarter for the first time since 2006.  Durable good orders surged in July on increased demand within the transportation sector as both <strong>General Motors Co.</strong> (<strong>OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:MTLQQ&amp;fstype=ii&amp;ei=vbKaSoSJA5P-Nf3gmLYB&amp;usg=AFQjCNFDu5APVSmgJ5TjkxZ-Erkm4AXO7A&amp;sig2=SMqXne0EDnFitPM-WJQvUw" target="_blank">MTLQQ</a></strong>) and <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4090940" target="_blank">Chrysler Group LLC</a></strong> put bankruptcy in their rearview mirrors and boosted production, while other companies also benefited from the “Cash for Clunkers” program.</p>
<p>When second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) was announced as a decline of 1%, many analysts expected a downward revision (perhaps significant) in the months that followed.  Well, the initial revision again showed a 1% decline, a negative showing, but one that many economists believe will be the last contraction in overall activity for a while.</p>
<p>The U.S. consumer remains one big wildcard for the strength of the economy moving forward.  Though the Conference Board reported a better-than-expected increase in its August consumer confidence report, the Reuters/U of Michigan sentiment index offered a contrasting view as it fell to its lowest level in four months.  Personal spending in July got a nice boost from the increase auto sales (“Cash for Clunkers” strikes again), though the income component of the release was unchanged and concerns about the labor picture continued to hinder consumer activity.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="351" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 25</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Confidence (08/09)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Surprisingly strong showing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 26</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Durable Goods Orders (07/09)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Largest increase since July 2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">New Home Sales (07/09)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">4th straight rise in sales</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 27</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (08/15)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Labor appears to be stabilizing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">GDP (2nd qtr)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Unchanged at -1% despite more pessimistic projections</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 28</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Personal Spending/Income (07/09)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Spending helped by Cash for Clunkers</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">September 1</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Construction Spending (07/09)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM (Manu) Index (08/09)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">September 2</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Factory Orders (07/09)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Policy Meeting Minutes</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">September 3</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (08/22)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM (Services) Index (08/09)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">September 4</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Unemployment Rate (08/09)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="79" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Nonfarm Payroll (08/09)</td>
<td width="155" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/31/financial-stocks-soar/">Soaring Prices for AIG, Fannie and Other Financial Stocks Sending Mixed Messages to Investors</a></strong></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/soaring-prices-for-aig-fannie-and-other-financial-stocks-sending-mixed-messages-to-investors/20240/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Economic Rebound and China’s Emergence Will Help Create a $300 Trillion Profit Opportunity for Investors</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/how-the-economic-rebound-and-china%e2%80%99s-emergence-will-help-create-a-300-trillion-profit-opportunity-for-investors/19822</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/how-the-economic-rebound-and-china%e2%80%99s-emergence-will-help-create-a-300-trillion-profit-opportunity-for-investors/19822#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRIC Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Resource Enterprise Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBMRY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What’s the name of the world’s best-selling beer? Hint: It’s not Budweiser. And it’s not Bud Light. It’s called Snow Beer, and I’ll wager that most U.S. investors haven’t even heard of it before.</p>
<p>If they haven’t, it’s not a surprise. You see, Snow Beer <a href="http://www.united-nations-of-beer.com/chinese-snow-beer.html" target="_blank">is only sold in China</a>, where the greed-bottled brew is a ubiquitous denizen of any retailer that carries beer. According to beer-market-researcher <a href="http://www.platologic.co.uk/" target="_blank">Plato Logic Ltd</a>., more than 6.1 billion kiloliters of Snow Beer was sold in 2008, up 19.1% from the year before &#8211; easily outselling such former worldwide leaders as Bud Light and Budweiser.</p>
<p>What may be a surprise is the fact that China is now the largest beer market in the world, <a href="http://www.euromonitor.com/China_usurps_USA_as_worlds_largest_beer_market" target="_blank">having surpassed the&#8230;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s the name of the world’s best-selling beer? Hint: It’s not Budweiser. And it’s not Bud Light. It’s called Snow Beer, and I’ll wager that most U.S. investors haven’t even heard of it before.<span id="more-19822"></span></p>
<p>If they haven’t, it’s not a surprise. You see, Snow Beer <a href="http://www.united-nations-of-beer.com/chinese-snow-beer.html" target="_blank">is only sold in China</a>, where the greed-bottled brew is a ubiquitous denizen of any retailer that carries beer. According to beer-market-researcher <a href="http://www.platologic.co.uk/" target="_blank">Plato Logic Ltd</a>., more than 6.1 billion kiloliters of Snow Beer was sold in 2008, up 19.1% from the year before &#8211; easily outselling such former worldwide leaders as Bud Light and Budweiser.</p>
<p>What may be a surprise is the fact that China is now the largest beer market in the world, <a href="http://www.euromonitor.com/China_usurps_USA_as_worlds_largest_beer_market" target="_blank">having surpassed the United States way back in 2001</a>.</p>
<p>“To many investors, China is an old, worn-out ‘been there/done that’ investing story,” says <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a></em></strong> Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald. “And some folks are downright scared of it. They got burned jumping into the “China Rush” back when China was the hot, next-big thing &#8211; and they jumped out for good. What those skeptical investors don’t realize is that they only experienced the <em>first chapter</em> of the China story.”</p>
<p>Says Fitz-Gerald: “Ironically, the worldwide financial crisis marks the beginning of the <em>second chapter</em> of China’s rise to economic dominance, as well as its emergence as a global economic superpower.”</p>
<p>Welcome to the new game of post-financial-crisis global investing, where the rules have changed completely, and where there are <strong><em>$300 trillion</em></strong> in profit opportunities &#8211; if you know where to look.</p>
<h3>Global Investing Web Summit</h3>
<p>In fact, these new profit plays are the focus of a free-of-charge <strong><em>Money Morning</em></strong> <a href="http://www.oxfonline.com/mm_webinar/summit_cj.html" target="_blank">Web summit</a> that Fitz-Gerald will host on Thursday afternoon. The 4 p.m. event &#8211; “<a href="http://www.oxfonline.com/mm_webinar/summit_cj.html" target="_blank">The $300 Trillion ‘Recovery’ That No One’s Talking About</a>” &#8211; is planned as a half-hour streaming video session in which Fitz-Gerald will address the changing rules of global investing, as well as a number of potential investment ideas that investors might wish to study more closely.</p>
<p>But the greatest benefit for investors who take the time to watch and listen to the free <a href="http://www.oxfonline.com/mm_webinar/summit_cj.html" target="_blank">Web summit</a> might be a perspective on globalization that they won’t be able to get anywhere else. Fitz-Gerald, a former professional trade advisor, is a well-known expert on global market trends who actually lives in Asia for part of each year. He heads an investing trip to Mainland China every year and in each of the past two years has actually written a multi-installment <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/view-from-china/" target="_blank">investment travelogue</a> for <strong><em>Money Morning</em></strong> readers.</p>
<p>It’s that time actually spent on the ground in China &#8211; and the high-level contacts that he’s nurtured as a result &#8211; that’s enabled Fitz-Gerald to provide <strong><em>Money Morning</em></strong> readers with unique and independently conceived insights on China that just aren’t freely available.</p>
<p>Let’s take a look at some of <a href="http://www.oxfonline.com/mm_webinar/summit_cj.html" target="_blank">the new rules of the global investing game that the Web summit will address</a> &#8211; as they relate to China.</p>
<h3>The Market Investors Can’t Afford to Ignore</h3>
<p>Far too many investors view China as a near-term investing bubble. In doing so, they miss the real point: China is probably the single-biggest profit opportunity of this generation &#8211; if not of our lifetimes. But it’s a long-term opportunity, and one that admittedly will experience some ups and downs &#8211; and even some major bumps &#8211; along the way.</p>
<p>But any near-term risks are dwarfed by the long-term growth potential China poses. For one thing, China is using the global financial crisis as an opportunity to transform itself &#8211; both from an internal and external standpoint.</p>
<p>There’s plenty of long-term growth potential from an internal standpoint alone.</p>
<p>China’s leaders understand that they can no longer afford to allow their economy to function as an export-only machine &#8211; whose fortunes rise or fall depending upon the health of such trading partners as the United States. So they’re transforming the economy into one where there’s actual domestic demand from China’s consumers.</p>
<p>That creates a massive opportunity. <a href="http://www.wikinvest.com/concept/Rise_of_China%27s_Middle_Class" target="_blank">China’s emerging middle class is already a major economic force</a>. Estimates of its size right now range from 100 million to 247 million, although one prediction says it could reach 600 million by 2015. For some perspective, consider this: The entire U.S. population is about 300 million.</p>
<p>Right now, about 35% of China’s economic activity is consumer driven. But households there save 35% of their wages. In the United States, by contrast, consumer spending drives 70% of the economy and the household savings rate is in the low single digits most of the time.</p>
<p>Consider this: As China’s economy evolves into more of a domestic/consumer-driven market, there’s plenty of fuel to keep driving an economy that &#8211; even now, tempered a bit by the global malaise &#8211; will advance at about an 8% clip through the rest of this year. And that’s considered a conservative estimate.</p>
<p>That bullish outlook is one reason that China’s stock market has outperformed its U.S. counterpart in recent years [See accompanying graphic for additional insights]</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/goglobal.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>Just think what will happen as China’s worker wages continue to advance, even as that country’s consumers save less and spend more, meaning that a greater percentage of China’s overall economic growth will be consumer driven.</p>
<p>Even as China makes that shift internally, however, that country will continue to become a bigger and bigger force in the global economy.</p>
<p>As we noted above, the global downturn is viewed inside China as a major expansion opportunity.</p>
<p>China’s companies are capitalizing on the weakness being experienced by the United States and Europe, and are working to grab market share away from their wheezing Western rivals.</p>
<p>And with U.S. stock prices still well below their record highs, expect to see cash-rich foreign firms &#8211; including those from China &#8211; buying market share, needed technologies or winning products by purchasing companies outright. The next round of U.S. takeovers will be made by foreign companies.</p>
<p>China has the financial firepower to make this happen: It’s foreign reserves are an all-time-world record of $2.1 trillion, meaning it will be able to help its companies finance deals that are deemed strategic in nature.</p>
<p>“The global blue chips of the future may well be companies whose names you have trouble pronouncing, with corporate headquarters in cities that are on the other side of the world,” <strong><em>Money Morning</em></strong>’s Fitz-Gerald says.</p>
<p>But don’t let that deter you. When it comes to profitable investing, the name of the game is ferreting out the most-promising profit plays &#8211; no matter where they are &#8211; while also managing risk.</p>
<p>And in the new global reality, one of the biggest risks is the risk of getting left behind &#8211; by failing to capitalize on the next round of global trends.</p>
<h3>“Emerging” Profit Plays</h3>
<p>Although his Thursday <a href="http://www.oxfonline.com/mm_webinar/summit_cj.html" target="_blank">Web summit</a> will focus a great deal on China, it won’t ignore the other developing investment opportunities that investors need to know about.</p>
<h3>Take the emerging markets of Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America, for example.</h3>
<p>According <a href="http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2011" target="_blank">to a 2008 report</a> by the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton Business School, the World Bank estimates that the global middle class is likely to grow from 430 million in 2000 to 1.15 billion in 2030. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=KO.N&amp;officerId=737821" target="_blank">Muhtar Kent</a>, chief executive officer of The Coca-Cola Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ko" target="_blank">KO</a>) since July 2008, says this opportunity is the equivalent of adding a city the size of New York to the world every three months.</p>
<p>In 2000, developing countries such as Brazil, India, China and others were home to 56% of the global middle class. By 2030, that figure is expected to reach 93%. China and India alone will account for two-thirds of the expansion &#8211; with China contributing 52% of the increase and India 12%, the World Bank said.</p>
<p>Among the biggest winners will be the multinational companies that are able to conceive, develop and market products and services that are “tailor-made for the burgeoning ranks of first-time consumers,” Wharton faculty and analysts found.</p>
<p>It goes without saying that the other winners will be the investors who find those companies while they are still undiscovered gems &#8211; and who then stick with them, understanding, as they do, the magnitude of the profit opportunity that stands before them.</p>
<p>One early example is Snow Beer, which is a partnered product &#8211; <a href="http://news.alibaba.com/article/detail/business-in-china/100079438-1-china%2527s-snow-beer-becomes-world%2527s.html" target="_blank">the result of a collaboration</a> between <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=HKG%3A0291" target="_blank">China Resource Enterprise Ltd</a>., and London-based SABMiller PLC (OTC ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:SBMRY" target="_blank">SBMRY</a>).</p>
<p>And there will be plenty more to come.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/11/global-investing-profits/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/11/global-investing-profits/">Source: How the Economic Rebound and China’s Emergence Will Help Create a $300 Trillion Profit Opportunity for Investors</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/how-the-economic-rebound-and-china%e2%80%99s-emergence-will-help-create-a-300-trillion-profit-opportunity-for-investors/19822/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Obama Stimulus Has Us on a Collision Course with Inflation</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-the-obama-stimulus-has-us-on-a-collision-course-with-inflation/19621</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-the-obama-stimulus-has-us-on-a-collision-course-with-inflation/19621#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobless Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YHOO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Has the massive Obama stimulus plan put us on a collision course with virulent inflation? It sure looks that way. Let me explain …</p>
<p>When the U.S. Commerce Department on Friday said the U.S. economy contracted at a 1% annual pace in the second quarter, the report was actually seen as good news: It was a slower decline than in each of the two prior quarters, and economists had expected a contraction of 1.5%.</p>
<p>“This is good news,” Nariman Behravesh, an economist with <strong>IHS Global Insight Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AIHS" target="_blank">IHS</a>), told <em>The San Francisco Chronicle</em>.</strong></p>
<p>But here’s the wild card: Although government spending did increase during the April-to-June quarter, only about 7.7% – $60.4 billion – of U.S. President <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/president_obama/" target="_blank">Barack Obama</a>’s stimulus package had actually made its way into the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has the massive Obama stimulus plan put us on a collision course with virulent inflation? It sure looks that way. Let me explain …<span id="more-19621"></span></p>
<p>When the U.S. Commerce Department on Friday said the U.S. economy contracted at a 1% annual pace in the second quarter, the report was actually seen as good news: It was a slower decline than in each of the two prior quarters, and economists had expected a contraction of 1.5%.</p>
<p>“This is good news,” Nariman Behravesh, an economist with <strong>IHS Global Insight Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AIHS" target="_blank">IHS</a>), told <em>The San Francisco Chronicle</em>.</strong></p>
<p>But here’s the wild card: Although government spending did increase during the April-to-June quarter, only about 7.7% – $60.4 billion – of U.S. President <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/president_obama/" target="_blank">Barack Obama</a>’s stimulus package had actually made its way into the U.S. economy by June 30, the quarter’s official conclusion. Of that total, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/31/news/economy/stimulus_GDP/?postversion=2009073115" target="_blank">the largest component went to U.S. states</a> to help defray the jump in Medicaid costs, <strong><em>CNNMoney.com </em></strong>reported.</p>
<p>Much of the $43 billion in stimulus tax relief – including the “<a href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204447,00.html" target="_blank">Making Work Pay</a>” tax credit for individual workers – also took effect during the second quarter, <strong><em>CNNMoney </em></strong>said.<strong></strong></p>
<p>At this point, it’s really difficult to “see how the effect of stimulus has been very large,” Edward Lazear, an economics professor at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business – who served as an advisor to former U.S. President <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/georgewbush/" target="_blank">George W. Bush</a> – told <strong><em>CNN</em></strong>. “Very little has gone out.”<br />
And that’s the problem.</p>
<p>In short, it looks like we’re already experiencing an economic rebound – without the Obama stimulus having really even kicked in … yet. In fact, the impatience over the continued U.S. malaise, the slowness of the economic turnaround and the fact that when growth does return we’re almost assured of a “<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/jobless-recovery/" target="_blank">jobless recovery</a>” actually has some Washington legislators already pushing for a <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/07/second-stimulus/" target="_blank">second stimulus</a>.</p>
<p>That means the economy will be in rebound mode when nearly three-quarters of a trillion dollars in stimulus money starts to flow in. Dumping all that money into an already-growing economy won’t just serve as a simple tailwind that gives the economy a gentle push; it will be more like the head-snapping start followed by the thunderous charge down the quarter mile that we see from one of the supercharged Top Fuel Funny Cars driven by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Hot_Rod_Association" target="_blank">National Hot Rod Association</a> (NHRA) star <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Force" target="_blank">John Force</a>. (From a standing start, Top Fuel Funny Cars cover a quarter mile in less than five seconds at speeds well in excess of 325 miles per hour).</p>
<p>And there’s only one outcome from that scenario – rampant inflation. In fact, U.S. consumers are probably headed for <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/31/obama-stimulus-trap/" target="_blank">the worst bout of inflation</a>since the 1980s. And that makes the so-called “<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/24/bernankes-exit-strategy/" target="_blank">exit strategy</a>” of U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke all the more important.<br />
To be sure, the Obama stimulus has given the economy a bit of a boost. So far:</p>
<ul>
<li>The states have deployed what stimulus money they have received, which helped fuel the biggest surge in state and local spending since 2007.</li>
<li>Some early pieces of the stimulus – such as the $25 increase in unemployment benefits – have allowed consumers to spend more.</li>
<li>And one economist – Economic Policy Institute’s Josh Bivens – said Obama stimulus money may have boosted growth by as much as three percentage points during the second quarter.</li>
</ul>
<p>But other economists say that – given the environment – the second-quarter GDP numbers were much too strong. After all, business spending dropped 8.9% and hours worked fell 7%. Somehow that doesn’t translate into a mere 1% drop in GDP. That latter figure will most certainly be revised downward in the future.</p>
<p>Unless or until that happens, look for the third quarter GDP statistics to give us a better picture of the U.S. economy’s health. Complaints that the promised stimulus money isn’t getting where it needs to be have Obama’s economic team working overtime to iron out the problems that keep cropping up.</p>
<p>Mark Thoma, an economics professor at the University of Oregon, told<strong><em>CNNMoney</em></strong> that “the third quarter will be a critical time period for assessing the stimulus package.”</p>
<p>And for assessing the inflation threat – which <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a></em></strong> has repeatedly warned is a very real threat. Gold, commodities, and other hard assets will be key holdings. The same is true for dividend-paying stocks. And make sure to go global – the best growth prospects will continue to be overseas.</p>
<h4>Market Matters</h4>
<p>A report by the New York Attorney General’s Office claims the initial nine institutions that received Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) money paid out $33 billion in bonuses in 2008.  Of particular note, <strong>Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=c" target="_blank">C</a>)</strong> and <strong>Bank of America (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong> rewarded a combined 900 employees (combined) with bonuses of at least $1 million, despite having received $45 billion each in government aid (and that doesn’t count the $3.6 billion <strong>Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. Inc.</strong> employees received).  Imagine how much they would have made if the companies were actually doing well?</p>
<p>While President Obama continued his road trip across America to promote health care reform, a group of conservative Democrats (Blue Dogs) came up with their version of a bill, but offered no timetable for completion.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, regulators pushed forward with proposed rules aimed at reducing speculation in the marketplace and focused on so-called “naked” short selling and on lpacing strict limits on commodities contracts.</p>
<p>In corporate news, deals were the theme of the week.  <strong>Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=msft" target="_blank">MSFT</a>)</strong> made amends with <strong>Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=YHOO" target="_blank">YHOO</a>)</strong> and forged a 10-year partnership to cut into <strong>Google Inc.’s (Nasdaq:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=goog" target="_blank">GOOG</a>)</strong> share of the Internet search business. And <strong>International Business Machines Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ibm" target="_blank">IBM</a>)</strong> is expanding its software empire with the purchase of <strong>SPSS Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=spss" target="_blank">SPSS</a>)</strong> for $1.2 billion.</p>
<p>On the earnings front, energy companies highlighted the week’s reports and the results were not pretty (though were expected).  On a positive note, <strong>Motorola Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=mot" target="_blank">MOT</a>)</strong> surprised analysts by reporting an unexpected profit, while offering a promising outlook, and <strong>Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=db" target="_blank">DB</a>)</strong> continued the favorable trend among (previously depressed) financials by posting strong earnings on solid investment banking operations.</p>
<p>Investors digested the mixed earnings news and chose to focus more on the positives.  Despite a temporary setback in China (5% index decline before encouraging comments by its central bank), the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> moved higher late in the week after <strong>General Electric Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ge" target="_blank">GE</a>)</strong> was upgraded to a “Buy” by a major analyst, a sign of an improving climate.  The <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq Composite Index</a></strong> even flirted with 2,000 for the first time since October 2008, and the<strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500 Index</a></strong> edged closer to 1,000, a level not seen since last November.</p>
<p>The Dow ended July with its best monthly performance since October 2002.  Japanese stocks moved to their highest levels in about 10 months and European equities soared to nine-month highs.  Bond investors breathed sighs of relief as a record $115 billion Treasury auctions came to a close and foreign bankers emerged as buyers on the final day.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="432" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Market/ Index</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Year Close (2008)</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Qtr Close (06/30/09)</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Previous Week<br />
(07/24/09)</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Current Week<br />
(07/31/09)</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">YTD Change</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">8,776.39</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">8,447.00</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">9,093.24</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">9,171.61</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+4.50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,577.03</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,835.04</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,965.96</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,978.50</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+25.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">903.25</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">919.32</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">979.26</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">987.48</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+9.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">499.45</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">508.28</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">548.46</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">556.71</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+11.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1526.21</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,629.31</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,747.64</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1,773.69</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+16.22%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">0.25%</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">0.25%</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">0.25%</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">0.25%</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">0 bps</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">2.24%</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">3.52%</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">3.67%</td>
<td width="73" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">3.50%</td>
<td width="86" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">+126 bps</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>Economically Speaking</h4>
<p>Has Fed Chairman Bernanke suddenly become Mr. Optimist these days? Early in the week, he proclaimed that the financial debacle ultimately would produce favorable results as “<em>not only will we will be back on track, but the economy will be stronger than it had been before this started</em>.”  He also urged Congress to move forward with a regulatory reform package to ensure that such dire times will not be repeated.</p>
<p>The Fed’s Beige Book showed that the economy remained weak, though signs of stabilization and improvements in manufacturing, housing, and even labor are occurring across several regions of the country.  Some districts reported enhanced corporate hiring, particularly within the healthcare and technology sectors.</p>
<p>The afore-mentioned second-quarter GDP report was better than expected, giving yet another indication that the recession is drawing closer to an end.</p>
<p>Still, it’s a much deeper recession than most realized: For the first time since records have been kept (1947), economic activity has declined for four consecutive quarters.  New homes sales skyrocketed in June by 11%, the fourth increase in the last six months, and home prices even climbed on a month-over-month basis for the first time since July 2006 according to the S&amp;P Case-Shiller index.</p>
<p>Durable good orders fell in June, though once the volatile transportation category was removed from the statistic, orders actually increased.  Consumer confidence fell in June, as ongoing pressures on the labor markets brought continued concerns and many Americans are refraining from major purchases (now and for the foreseeable future).</p>
<p>On the other hand, jobless claims rose in the most recent week, though analysts pointed to discrepancies from the auto industry.   Looking at the four-week moving average as a better gauge, claims for unemployment benefits actually fell to the lowest level since January and continuous claims unexpectedly declined, as well.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong><strong></strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="350" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Date</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Release</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Comments</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 27</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">New Home Sales (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Highest level of sales since November 2008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 28</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Confidence (07/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">2nd consecutive monthly decline</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 29</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Durable Goods Orders (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Decline due to cutbacks in volatile aircraft orders</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed’s Beige Book</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Weak economy, though signs of stabilization</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 30</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (07/25)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">4 week average, best since January</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 31</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">GDP (2nd Qtr)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Contracted, but at a slower than expected pace</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">The Week Ahead</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 3</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Construction Spending (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM – Manu (07/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 4</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Personal Income/Spending (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 5</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Factory Orders (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM – Services (07/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 6</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (08/01)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 7</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Unemployment Rate (07/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Non-farm Payroll (07/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Credit (06/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/03/obama-stimulus-inflation/">Why the Obama Stimulus Has Us on a Collision Course with Inflation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-the-obama-stimulus-has-us-on-a-collision-course-with-inflation/19621/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investors Looking to Tech to Pull U.S. Stocks &#8211; and the Economy &#8211; Out of Their Doldrums</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investors-looking-to-tech-to-pull-us-stocks-and-the-economy-out-of-their-doldrums/19032</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investors-looking-to-tech-to-pull-us-stocks-and-the-economy-out-of-their-doldrums/19032#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMGMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>Stock investors will key next on earnings from tech giant <strong>Intel Corp.</strong>(Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AINTC" target="_blank">INTC</a>) and banks including <strong>J.P. Morgan Chase &#38; Co. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=jpm" target="_blank">JPM</a>)</strong> for hints of what to expect in the third quarter — and how badly the recession hurt businesses in the second quarter.</p>
<p>The <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &#38; Poor’s 500 Index</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> delayed declined for the fourth straight week last week &#8211; the longest string of losses since stocks hit their low point in March &#8211; and investors are looking at the tech sector to squelch the ongoing decline. The <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq Composite Index</a></strong> complost 2.47% in the week ended Friday.</p>
<p>Earnings reports this week from computer-chip giant <strong>Intel </strong>and several big banks &#8211; including <strong>JPMorgan Chase &#38; Co. </strong>- could provide investors and economists some insights on where the U.S. economy&#8230;</p></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>Stock investors will key next on earnings from tech giant <strong>Intel Corp.</strong>(Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AINTC" target="_blank">INTC</a>) and banks including <strong>J.P. Morgan Chase &amp; Co. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=jpm" target="_blank">JPM</a>)</strong> for hints of what to expect in the third quarter — and how badly the recession hurt businesses in the second quarter.<span id="more-19032"></span></p>
<p>The <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500 Index</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> delayed declined for the fourth straight week last week &#8211; the longest string of losses since stocks hit their low point in March &#8211; and investors are looking at the tech sector to squelch the ongoing decline. The <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq Composite Index</a></strong> complost 2.47% in the week ended Friday.</p>
<p>Earnings reports this week from computer-chip giant <strong>Intel </strong>and several big banks &#8211; including <strong>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. </strong>- could provide investors and economists some insights on where the U.S. economy appears to be headed. Earnings are expected to improve over the last quarter, even though they’ll still be down substantially on a year-over-year basis, Binky Chadha, chief U.S. equity strategist at <strong>Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=DB" target="_blank">DB</a>)</strong>, told <strong><em>MarketWatch.com,</em></strong></p>
<p>“A <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/stocks-hang-hopes-on-tech-financials-next-week" target="_blank">necessary condition for the markets to go up from here is that earnings have to deliver</a>, and we need a dissipation of the uncertainty about earnings,” Chadha said.</p>
<p>Year-over-year (annual) earnings comparisons are typically the financial yardstick that analysts use to assess whether the U.S. economy is growing or declining, meaning that “sequential” (quarter-to-quarter) earnings aren’t as crucial. This time around, however, the quarterly numbers may be viewed as important because they might give a better picture of the economy’s health.</p>
<p>During periods of extreme uncertainty, earnings estimates for companies tend to be widely dispersed &#8211; a function of investors not really knowing what to expect. That’s particularly true right now of banks and financial-services companies &#8211; and companies that derive most of their income from discretionary consumer spending.</p>
<p>And that makes sense, given that those are the two most uncertain portions of the U.S. economy &#8211; thanks to the ongoing global financial crisis and a jobless recovery that is badly crimping consumer confidence.</p>
<p>After mounting one of the strongest surges in history from their March lows, U.S. stocks have fallen back in recent weeks as investors dealt with a growing realization that the U.S. economy &#8211; and its counterparts abroad &#8211; won’t rebound with the speed or strength that had been widely expected. Further evidence of this came on July 2, when a U.S. payrolls report said the economy had lost more jobs than had been expected.</p>
<p>Against that backdrop, analysts and other investors are looking to the U.S. high-tech sector to pull the economy out its doldrums, <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a></em></strong> recently reported as part of its mid-year forecast series.</p>
<p><strong><em>Thomson Reuters</em></strong> predicted that S&amp;P 500 earnings will decline by 36% from last year’s levels, with financials (-53%) leading the way and techs (-24%) performing better than other sectors.  This should represent the eighth-straight quarterly decline, though analysts seem more concerned about the ensuing management comments on future operations, since that will shed some light on where the economy is headed.</p>
<p>When Intel reports tomorrow (Tuesday) analysts expect to see that /quotes/comstock/15*!intc/quotes/nls/intcsecond-quarter sales and earnings plunged, but some analysts believe demand may be returning to the battered market following a sharp slowdown in demand for high-tech goods. Internet-search juggernaut <strong>Google Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=goog" target="_blank">GOOG</a>)</strong> will report on Thursday.</p>
<p>Other firms that report this week include <strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gs" target="_blank">GS</a>),</strong> <strong>Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong> and <strong>Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=c" target="_blank">C</a>)</strong>. JPMorgan reports Wednesday.</p>
<p>“The market is filled with folks who want to be optimistic, but simply cannot find enough genuine reasons to buy into the market,” Mike Gambale, an analyst at <strong>Informa Global Markets</strong>, told journalists. “We don’t expect impressive numbers across the board, but there will be some surprises, as there always are.”</p>
<p>[If you're new to the commodities-investing arena, and are uncertain about the landscape - or even if you're an "old hand" at natural-resource stocks, but want some insights into the new profit plays and new players - consider hiring a guide: <em>Money Morning</em> Contributing Editor <a href="http://partners.moneymorningaffiliates.com/z/369/CD15/">Peter Krauth</a>, a recognized expert in metals, mining and energy stocks, is also the editor of the <em><a href="http://partners.moneymorningaffiliates.com/z/369/CD15/">Global Resource Alert</a></em> trading service, which ferrets out companies poised to profit from the so-called "Secular Bull Market" in commodities. A former portfolio advisor, Krauth continues to work out of resource-rich Canada, which keeps him close to most of the companies he researches. Against the growing global financial malaise, Krauth says that commodities are among the most-profitable and least-risky investments available, and notes that this may well be the most powerful bull market for commodities <a href="http://partners.moneymorningaffiliates.com/z/369/CD15/">we'll see in our lifetime</a>. He makes a strong case. To read more about his strategies, and the sector plays he likes the most, <a href="http://partners.moneymorningaffiliates.com/z/369/CD15/">Please click here</a>. ] <img src="http://partners.moneymorningaffiliates.com/42/CD15/369/" border="0" alt="" /></p>
<h4>Market Matters</h4>
<p>“New and improved” was the market mantra of the week.<strong> General Motors Corp. (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gmgmq" target="_blank">GMGMQ</a>)</strong> emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection after just over a month, eager to start anew as a “new and improved” automaker.</p>
<p>The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) set its sights on “new and improved” trading regulations to limit excessive speculation within the energy and other commodities markets.  Some politicos are calling for a “new and improved” stimulus package to move the economy beyond the worst recession since the Great Depression.  A “new and improved” Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP) was scaled back dramatically as selected managers will begin purchasing toxic assets from ailing banks.  Unfortunately, as the week progressed, investors did not seem too keen on these “new and improved<em>” </em>developments.</p>
<p>Despite harsh protests by consumer groups and creditors, new GM reopened for business, “leaner and meaner” than ever.  A judge’s ruling allowed the once-bankrupt company to sell its performing assets to a new government-controlled entity (thanks to a $50 billion “investment” by taxpayers).</p>
<p>The government then shifted its attention to the regulatory world and announced plans to propose trading restrictions on certain commodities and increase the oversight over risky derivative products that have proven so detrimental to the financial markets.</p>
<p>The widely anticipated earnings season got started as <strong>Alcoa</strong> <strong>Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=aa" target="_blank">AA</a>)</strong> reported another quarterly loss (with better-than-expected numbers) and oil giant <strong>Chevron</strong> <strong>Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=cvx" target="_blank">CVX</a>)</strong> warned that its results would be hindered by poor refinery operations and a weak dollar.</p>
<p>Investors have taken a more cautious approach heading into the new (but not improved) earnings season, particularly after last week’s pessimistic labor data.</p>
<p>Stocks fell throughout the week and fixed income again became beneficiary of safe-haven trades.  The tech-heavy Nasdaq now remains the only major domestic stock index “in the black” for the year.</p>
<p>Fickle energy traders suddenly turned bearish, as well, as the weak economic data implied that oil demand would be curtailed for the foreseeable future (or, at least, until 2013 according to Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries’ “2009 World Oil Outlook”).  Crude oil plunged beneath $59, or more than 10% during the week, on ongoing economic concerns,  although consumers ultimately may be recipients of cheaper gas prices.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="416" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (06/30/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(07/03/09)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(07/10/09)</strong></td>
<td width="78" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,447.00</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,280.74</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,146.52</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-7.18%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,835.04</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,796.52<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,756.03</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+11.35%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">919.32</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">896.42</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">879.13</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-2.67%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">508.28</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">497.21</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">480.98</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-3.70%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,629.31<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,608.29<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,561.11</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+2.29%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.52%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.50%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.30%</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+106 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>Economically Speaking</h4>
<p>Talk of a second stimulus surfaced this week, with several leaders &#8211; including U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and investing icon Warren Buffett &#8211; stating that the Obama administration’s $787 billion stimulus isn’t enough to jumpstart the U.S. economy.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., believes the plan needs more time to work through the system as only 10% or so has even been distributed thus far.  Economists seem to agree with “Hank,” as the latest <strong><em>Wall Street Journal</em></strong> survey reported that over 80% of respondents feel that the country does not need a new round of stimulus in the current environment.  Still, the “Oracle of Omaha” painted an optimistic picture of the future by stating that the United States is “going  to come out of this better than ever, the best days of America lie ahead but not next week or next month.”</p>
<p>On the global front, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) revised &#8211; upward &#8211; its forecast of economic growth for 2010 and confirmed its belief that the developing economies in China and India will greatly contribute to the global rebound.</p>
<p>The May trade balance highlighted a slow week of data as the deficit declined to its lowest level since late 1999 and the weak labor market helped reduce consumer demand for foreign goods.</p>
<p>While initial claims for unemployment benefits fell to levels not seen since the beginning of the year, continuous claims (those folks who remain on the unemployment rolls for over a week) rose by another record amount.</p>
<p>In other words, no matter how one dissects the numbers, the labor picture looks dire and may not begin to improve for some time.  As such, the latest University of Michigan consumer sentiment reading dropped for the first time since February, another sign that the optimism of the past few months may be fading fast.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="276" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 6</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM &#8211; Services (06/09)</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Contraction, but best showing since September 2008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 8</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Credit (05/09)</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">4th straight monthly decline in borrowing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 9</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (07/04)</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Best showing since Jan, though labor remains weak</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 10</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Balance of Trade (05/09)</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fell to lowest level since November 1999</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 14</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">PPI (06/09)</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Retail Sales (06/09)</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 15</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">CPI (06/09)</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Industrial Production (06/09)</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 16</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (07/11)</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="52" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 17</td>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Housing Starts (06/09)</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/13/tech-stock/">Investors Looking to Tech to Pull U.S. Stocks &#8211; and the Economy &#8211; Out of Their Doldrums</a></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investors-looking-to-tech-to-pull-us-stocks-and-the-economy-out-of-their-doldrums/19032/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Dismal Earnings Season for U.S. Companies?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/another-dismal-earnings-season-for-us-companies/18732</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/another-dismal-earnings-season-for-us-companies/18732#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ppip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Investors and analysts return from the long holiday weekend only to face a rather light week on the economic calendar – except for the earliest stages of what’s expected to be yet another dismal earnings season for U.S. companies.</p>
<div class="entry">
<p>Aluminum giant Alcoa Inc.<strong> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=AA" target="_blank">AA</a>) reports on Wednesday, with<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/alcoa-reports-on-second-quarter-wednesday/article1205771/" target="_blank">analysts expecting a second-quarter loss of 34 cents a share</a>, compared with a profit of 66 cents a year ago. The ongoing worldwide financial crisis has caused demand for its product to collapse, which in turn has caused prices (and the company’s revenue and profits) to do the same. Analysts polled by <strong><em>Thomson Reuters</em></strong> <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200907021357DOWJONESDJONLINE000721_FORTUNE5.htm" target="_blank">expect Alcoa to post its third consecutive loss</a>, with revenue expected to be nearly halved.</p>
<p>While <strong><em>Thomson Reuters </em></strong>expects another dismal quarterly showing (down about&#8230;</p></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Investors and analysts return from the long holiday weekend only to face a rather light week on the economic calendar – except for the earliest stages of what’s expected to be yet another dismal earnings season for U.S. companies.<span id="more-18732"></span></p>
<div class="entry">
<p>Aluminum giant Alcoa Inc.<strong> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=AA" target="_blank">AA</a>) reports on Wednesday, with<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/alcoa-reports-on-second-quarter-wednesday/article1205771/" target="_blank">analysts expecting a second-quarter loss of 34 cents a share</a>, compared with a profit of 66 cents a year ago. The ongoing worldwide financial crisis has caused demand for its product to collapse, which in turn has caused prices (and the company’s revenue and profits) to do the same. Analysts polled by <strong><em>Thomson Reuters</em></strong> <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200907021357DOWJONESDJONLINE000721_FORTUNE5.htm" target="_blank">expect Alcoa to post its third consecutive loss</a>, with revenue expected to be nearly halved.</p>
<p>While <strong><em>Thomson Reuters </em></strong>expects another dismal quarterly showing (down about 20% overall), its analysts are forecasting that strong earnings growth will reappear in the fourth quarter. Investors are trying to make heads or tails of the recent economic data and future earnings reports as they map out the next direction for the markets.  Although many believe the euphoric rally of the past quarter ended in recent weeks, some prognosticators remain torn between a retest of the March lows or sideways trading for the foreseeable future (until the “real” recovery emerges).</p>
<p>As <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a></em></strong> reported late last week as part of its current “Mid-Year Forecast Series,” <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/01/tech-sector-rebound-2/" target="_blank">the U.S. high-tech sector figures to play a major role in the hoped-for rebound</a>.</p>
<h4>Market Matters</h4>
<p>A federal court judge last week threw the proverbial book at Wall Street swindler Bernard <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/25/financial-system/" target="_blank">Madoff</a> <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/ci_12717773" target="_blank">by sentencing him to 150 years in prison</a> and seizing much of his (and his wife’s) personal wealth.  The verdict could have sent a message to “greedy” Wall Street to reinvent itself, but a few firms apparently never saw the memo.  Analysts predict that per-employee compensation at Goldman Sachs Group Inc.<strong> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=GS" target="_blank">GS</a>) will average $700,000 in 2009, while those at Morgan Stanley<strong> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=MS" target="_blank">MS</a>) will top $350,000, levels that far exceed their 2008 pay structures and that are more in line with those of pre-crisis 2007.</p>
<p>The second quarter came to a close and equity indexes enjoyed their best results since 2003: The <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> was up 11%, the tech-laden <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq Composite Index</a> up 20%, and the <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s Index</a> up 15%.</p>
<p>While investors went bottom-fishing for bargains, the euphoria fizzled out over the past few weeks as many began to sense that <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/08/bull-market-for-stocks/" target="_blank">the rally had moved too much too quickly</a> (and the economy still has many issues yet to resolve).  Financials, energy, and basic material stocks led the upward surge last quarter, while emerging markets like India and China benefited greatly from the rise in commodities prices.  As investors increased their appetites for risk, government securities were among the big losers, though corporate bonds (both high quality and high yield) performed well within the fixed income asset class.</p>
<p>While the U.S. Treasury prepared to launch its Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP) to remove toxic assets from the books of troubled institutions, its magnitude seems likely to be scaled back dramatically.  In the early stage of development, U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner spoke of providing $50 billion in government funds so approved investment firms could purchase these assets.  Now the program seems to have dwindled down to about $20 billion and some believe the “thawing” of the equity and credit markets has negated the need for such massive government participation.</p>
<p>In another “ailing” industry – the U.S. auto market – Ford Motor Co.<strong></strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=F" target="_blank">F</a>) announced a smaller-than-expected decline in June domestic sales as the (non-bankrupt) automaker continued to take advantage of the hardships of its main rivals.  Even Japanese heavyweight Toyota Motor Co.<strong> </strong>(NYSE ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=TM" target="_blank">TM</a>) saw its monthly activity fall by 32% – losing out to Ford in total vehicles sold for the third consecutive month.</p>
<p>Weaker-than-expected releases (see below) sent equities into a tailspin and left the indexes down big for the week.  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/02/jobs-report-hits-oil-prices/" target="_blank">Oil fell below the $67 a barrel level</a> as traders perceived the expected post-recession increase in demand will not occur overnight. While fixed income seemed primed to benefit from a “flight-to-quality,” some investors held off as they await the $136 billion in new U.S. Treasury debt.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="412" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (06/30/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(06/26/09)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(07/03/09)</strong></td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,447.00</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,438.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>8,280.74</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-5.65%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,835.04</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,838.22</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,796.52</p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+13.92%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">919.32</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">918.90</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>896.42</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-0.76%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">508.28</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">513.22</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>497.21</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-0.45%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,629.31<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,633.36<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,608.29</p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+5.38%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.52%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.51%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>3.50%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+126 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>Economically Speaking</h4>
<p>A heavy week on the economic calendar kept investors from taking off early in observance of Independence Day (though many probably got a nice head start).  Most of the releases of the week offered some surprises; unfortunately, few were positive.  Consumer confidence dropped in June as folks continued to fear for their jobs – and rightfully so, as the odds of a “<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/jobless-recovery/" target="_blank">jobless recovery</a>” seem to grow almost daily.</p>
<p>While the past few months offered a bit of optimism that the consumer was back to lead the economy into recovery, the recent data revealed that pessimism lingers. Still, the <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/economics/ConsumerConfidence.cfm" target="_blank">Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index</a> has risen dramatically since the historic lows experienced in February 2009.  Construction spending surprisingly fell in May to its lowest level in more than five years, despite the expected boost (or lack thereof) from the economic stimulus package.  While manufacturing <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/01/manufacturing-china-india/" target="_blank">showed some signs of improvement</a>, the data indicated that any real sector growth is still a few months away.</p>
<p>Finally, the labor market proved again that it will remain a huge thorn in the side of the economy and the primary reason any recovery will be slow to develop.  The <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/02/june-unemployment-rate/" target="_blank">unemployment rate pushed closer to the dreaded 10% level</a>, and now stands at 9.5%, its highest level in almost 26 years. More than 465,000 jobs were eliminated from the economy in June.  All told, more than 6.5 million employees have moved to the ranks of the unemployed since the recession officially began in December 2007.  In the “misery-loves-company” category, the 16-country euro zone also reported a jobless rate of 9.5% in May, its worst showing in more than 10 years.  Additionally, the British economy posted its weakest quarter in terms of growth (contraction) since 1958.</p>
<p>Even before the dire labor picture was revealed, San Francisco Fed Chair Janet Yellen painted a negative outlook for the economy, stating that the pending recovery will be “frustratingly slow,” while also noting that the U.S. Federal Reserve is likely to leave the benchmark Federal Funds Rate at its current level (of around 0.00%) for some time.  Across the pond, the European Central Bank (ECB) held its primary rate steady at 1.0% and indicated that its gradual recovery should include a return to positive growth by mid-2010.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="293" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 30</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Confidence (06/09)</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Surprising decline in confidence level</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 1</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Construction Spending (05/09)</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Worse level of activity in over 5 years</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM –Manu (06/09)</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Sector improving, but still not in growth mode</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 2</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (06/27/09)</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Decline in both new and continuing claims</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Unemployment Rate (06/09)</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Highest level in 26 years</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Non-farm Payroll (06/09)</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Larger than expected cut in jobs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Factory Orders (05/09)</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Strongest increase since last June 2008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 3</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 4th Holiday Observed</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Markets Closed</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 6</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM – Services (06/09)</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 8</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Credit (05/09)</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 9</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (07/04)</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 10</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Balance of Trade (05/09)</td>
<td width="144" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/06/us-corporate-earnings/">Another Dismal Earnings Season for U.S. Companies?</a></p>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/another-dismal-earnings-season-for-us-companies/18732/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Week of Controversy Undermine Financial System Overhaul That Calls for Broad Expansion of Central Bank’s Power?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/will-week-of-controversy-undermine-financial-system-overhaul-that-calls-for-broad-expansion-of-central-bank%e2%80%99s-power/18467</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/will-week-of-controversy-undermine-financial-system-overhaul-that-calls-for-broad-expansion-of-central-bank%e2%80%99s-power/18467#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBBY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>Documents brought to light by key by congressional investigators hightlight real disagreement between top-level U.S. Federal Reserve officials about how it should address the <strong>Bank of America Corp.(NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong> acquisition of <strong>Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. Inc</strong>. are almost certain to fuel the ongoing congressional debate over <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/18/obamas-financial-system/" target="_blank">the central bank’s push to expand its authority over the U.S. financial system</a>.</p>
<p>This <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124606477050863921.html" target="_blank">growing concern</a> manifested itself Thursday, when Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke; was grilled by Capitol Hill lawmakers during a congressional hearing looking into the central bank’s conduct in BofA’s buyout of Merrill Lynch. Bernanke’s failure to resolve some of the most-pointed questions posed by congressional leaders – (especially Republicans) who wanted to discover whether the Fed overstepped its authority and interfered with merger-related decisions – may undermine a&#8230;</p></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>Documents brought to light by key by congressional investigators hightlight real disagreement between top-level U.S. Federal Reserve officials about how it should address the <strong>Bank of America Corp.(NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong> acquisition of <strong>Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. Inc</strong>. are almost certain to fuel the ongoing congressional debate over <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/18/obamas-financial-system/" target="_blank">the central bank’s push to expand its authority over the U.S. financial system</a>.<span id="more-18467"></span></p>
<p>This <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124606477050863921.html" target="_blank">growing concern</a> manifested itself Thursday, when Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke; was grilled by Capitol Hill lawmakers during a congressional hearing looking into the central bank’s conduct in BofA’s buyout of Merrill Lynch. Bernanke’s failure to resolve some of the most-pointed questions posed by congressional leaders – (especially Republicans) who wanted to discover whether the Fed overstepped its authority and interfered with merger-related decisions – may undermine a proposed financial system overhaul that would imbue the central bank with broad authority over big U.S. financial institutions. One example: In the Bank of America deal for Merrill Lynch, lawmakers felt that Bernanke &amp; Co. should’ve required more concessions in return for the taxpayer-supplied financial aid, <strong><em>Bloomberg News</em></strong> said.</p>
<p>The bottom line: The additional oversight powers that Bernanke is seeking – and that are part and parcel of the proposed Obama administration financial-system overhaul <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=a_z0qiOJU3.E" target="_blank">may prove to be one very tough sell.</a></p>
<p>Both parties are likely to find fault with U.S. President Barack Obama’s plan to put the Fed on the point, positioning it as the single agency responsible for supervising the U.S. economy’s largest and most-interconnected banks and financial institutions, giving the central bank the power to dictate financial standards on capital, management of risk and even liquidity requirements.</p>
<p>“It may be more important for us to find another systemic risk regulator,” U.S. Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa., who is a member of the House Oversight Committee where Bernanke appeared, told <strong><em>Bloomberg TV</em></strong>. Congress should “hesitate to put any more authority on the back of the Federal Reserve.”<br />
The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124606477050863921.html" target="_blank">internal central bank documents</a> – e-mails, written notes and even official memos paint a picture of a government institution that’s “wrestling” with how tough it should be on BofA and other big banks,<strong><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></strong> reported. In December, Bank of America told federal officials it was looking to possibly end the deal, and current and former bank officials contend that the Fed and former Bush administration officials pressured BofA to go through with the deal, which has turned out to be much-less beneficial than hoped for.</p>
<p>On the other hand, these disclosures could bolster the argument by Fed officials that the central bank needs these powers to address future financial crises. The reason: These  disclosures show that it lacked the “tools” (the legislated power and authority) needed to tackle the problems as soon as they surfaced. The inability to do so probably lengthened the crisis and exacerbated both the damages – as well as its ultimate cost.</p>
<h4>Market Matters</h4>
<p>In non-financial news, U.S. commercial aircraft giant The <strong>Boeing Co. (NYSE: BA)</strong> struggled through a miserable week as it postponed testing of the new 787 Dreamliner aircraft and also lost orders from <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ASX%3AQAN" target="_blank">Qantas Airways Ltd</a></strong>., as the entire industry continued to suffer the ill effects of the economic downturn on travel.</p>
<p><strong>Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:AAPL" target="_blank">AAPL</a>)</strong> <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/22/steve-jobs-liver/" target="_blank">reported better-than-expected early sales</a>of its new iPhone 3G and appeared close to welcoming its fearless leader, Chief Executive Officer Steven Jobs, back to work.  Tech giant<strong>Oracle</strong> <strong>Corp. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:ORCL&amp;ei=c5BHSrzRIZOuMMqpibMK&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=spellmeleon_result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ct=result&amp;usg=AFQjCNEJXKrX1hTypJMARtZMUdRzaVMTgg" target="_blank">ORCL</a>)</strong> announced declining profits, but offered favorable forecasts for the current quarter and beyond.  Likewise, retailer <strong>Bed Bath and Beyond Inc.</strong> <strong>(Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:BBBY&amp;ei=jpBHSsSjDYvUMv37lKgB&amp;usg=AFQjCNHRnO2AmHYkF5YKN3B2KGAP4SXi-Q&amp;sig2=kDrmYxPZvSzPza9vzBrCcA" target="_blank">BBBY</a>)</strong> experienced a surprisingly strong quarter, a nice sign that the ailing consumer may be showing renewed life.  State-owned <strong>Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Group (NYSE ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:SHI&amp;ei=r5BHSqixD5SINOS6mKsC&amp;usg=AFQjCNHTUSDAGPMhdhpVLOaGSmCUXm1htg&amp;sig2=RDBtTFHW4TJ3lUC-moRf8g" target="_blank">SHI</a>)</strong> <a href="http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=96051&amp;cat=8" target="_blank">is attempting to purchase</a> Swiss-based <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=addax" target="_blank">Addax Petroleum Corp.</a></strong> for $7.2 billion in what would be the largest global acquisition by a Chinese company.</p>
<p>Investors breathed a collective sign of relief when the final leg of the record $104 billion U.S. Treasury auction came to a close and interest rates had not soared through the roof.  Instead, institutions and sovereign funds seemed to maintain a hearty appetite for U.S. government securities, despite rumors to the contrary.  In recent weeks, naysayers have been predicting that foreign buyers would shun domestic fixed income as the ballooning U.S. deficit spiraled out of control with expensive new programs to cure all that ailed the country.  For the time being, at least, Treasuries remain a safe-haven investment, and the yield of the benchmark 10-year bond even fell to around 3.5%.</p>
<p>From an equity standpoint, investors remain confused about the future direction of the markets and whether to ride the prior upward trend or take profits from the rally that exceeded 30% in anticipation of a return to the lows set in early-March.  Some believe the indexes will trade sideways for the foreseeable future.  The <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> lost ground (thanks in large part to Boeing), while other major indexes closed relatively flat from the prior week’s levels.  Despite a bit of volatility, oil hovered neared $70 a barrel level and gasoline prices fell slightly for the first time in two months.</p>
<p>While the economic numbers appear to be getting stronger (see below), many investors want to see more than just “less” contradiction or “slower” weakness in the economy and various sectors.  Many believe that the “worst of times” may be over, but the “best of times” may still be far away.  Some even approve of the job Bernanke is doing (despite what their elected reps are saying).</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="399" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (03/31/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(06/19/09)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(06/26/09)</strong></td>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">7,608.92</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,539.73<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>8,438.39</strong><strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-3.85%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,528.59</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,827.47<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>1,838.22</strong><strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+16.56%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">797.87</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">921.23<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>918.90</strong><strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+1.73%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">422.75</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">512.72<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>513.22</strong><strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+2.76%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1347.38</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,633.70<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,633.36</p>
</td>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+7.02%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.68%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.79%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.51%</p>
</td>
<td width="61" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+127 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>Economically Speaking</h2>
<p>A Congressional tongue-lashing didn’t keep Bernanke and Fed policymakers from completing their business at hand.  Last week’s policy meeting provided few surprises as the Fed left the benchmark Fed Funds rate unchanged at (virtually) 0% and announced that no rate changes seem likely in the near-term.  The Fed also confirmed its intent to buy $1.45 trillion in mortgage-related securities and $300 billion in Treasuries, though made no commitment to purchase more than that previously announced amount.  The accompanying statement depicted an economy that remained weak, but seemed to be exhibiting some signs of rebounding (ever so slightly).  For the time being, inflation (or even deflation) does not appear to be of major concern.  The policymakers also continued to apprise the public on the success of the various “stimulus” actions and announced the closing of several lending programs that they no longer deem necessary.</p>
<p>The World Bank <a href="http://www.topnews.in/world-bank-slashes-growth-projection-global-recession-deepens-2176833" target="_blank">said the worldwide slump would be worse than it has previously projected</a>, boosting its forecasted slump to 3% from the previous forecast which called for a slump of 1.75% – and claimed that activity would be the worst on record.  By contrast, the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/24/oecd-outlook/" target="_blank">reported that the “worst may soon be over</a>” and revised its economic forecast to more favorable terms for the first time in two years.</p>
<p>Among weekly releases, new home sales declined in May and existing home sales rose less than expected as much of the buying centered around distressed sales and foreclosures.  The median price of an existing home purchased in May was more than 16% below last year’s level.</p>
<p>Higher durable goods orders lent some confidence to manufacturers, as activity rose for the second consecutive month.  Personal income and spending both increased in May and the administration was quick to praise the benefits of the stimulus package.  However, the savings rate also climbed to its highest level in 15 years as consumers remained uncertain about the economy in general and their job situations in particular.  On a bright note, the Reuters/University of Michigan Sentiment index increased to its highest level since February 2008. Gross domestic product (GDP) in the first quarter was revised again – to minus 5.5% (from minus 5.7% reported last month), a positive sign, though impatient economists and investors alike seem ready for even better (positive) data in the quarters to come.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="327" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 23</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Existing Home Sales (05/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Slower than expected increase in activity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 24</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Durable Goods Orders (05/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">2nd consecutive monthly increase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">New Home Sales (05/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Surprising decline in sales</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Policy Meeting</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Recession easing with no real signs of inflation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 25</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (06/20/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Increases in new and total claims</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">GDP (1st qtr revised)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Contraction improved to -5.5% from -5.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 26</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Personal Income/Spending (05/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Higher income, spending, and savings due to stimulus</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 30</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Confidence (06/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 1</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Construction Spending (05/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM –Manu (06/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 2</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (06/27/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Unemployment Rate (06/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Non-farm Payroll (06/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Factory Orders (05/09)</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="50" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 3</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 4th Holiday Observed</td>
<td width="160" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/29/financial-system-overhaul-controversy/">Will Week of Controversy Undermine Financial System Overhaul That Calls for Broad Expansion of Central Bank’s Power?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://partners.moneymorningaffiliates.com/z/357/CD15/"><strong>Peter Schiff: Why this Money Should Replace the U.S. Dollar</strong></a> There&#8217;s a new universal currency, backed by solid gold. You can use it to make online purchases anywhere in the world. Converting some money to the new currency takes just 5 minutes. You can start with as little as $10&#8230; or as much as $10 million. According to CNBC star analyst and Euro Pacific Capital President Peter Schiff, this money could double the value of your savings &#8211; automatically &#8211; in just 6-9 months. For Schiff&#8217;s full analysis and recommendations, <a href="http://partners.moneymorningaffiliates.com/z/357/CD15/">please go here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/will-week-of-controversy-undermine-financial-system-overhaul-that-calls-for-broad-expansion-of-central-bank%e2%80%99s-power/18467/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Market Stumble Heightens Worries That Economic Rebound May Not Be That Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/market-stumble-heightens-worries-that-economic-rebound-may-not-be-that-strong/18162</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/market-stumble-heightens-worries-that-economic-rebound-may-not-be-that-strong/18162#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMGMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Share Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>U.S. stocks suffered their first weekly loss since May last week, further exacerbating trader concern that the bullish surge that sent share prices up as much as 40% from their March lows may have been overdone.</p>
<p>Traders have grown increasingly fearful in recent weeks that the powerful surge in the three major U.S. stock indices &#8211; one of the strongest in history &#8211; may not have been justified because of an ongoing economic recovery that’s not as strong as originally believed.</p>
<p>&#8220;There’s <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jmT59dgLTTziX4p9X9MRBRpWZGdQD98TVHO80" target="_blank">no question in my mind that the economy is improving</a>,&#8221; Phil Orlando, chief equity market strategist at Federated Investors, told <strong><em>The Associated Press</em></strong> on Friday. &#8220;But investors are betting on some sideways consolidation rather than a continuation of a sharp spike in share&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. stocks suffered their first weekly loss since May last week, further exacerbating trader concern that the bullish surge that sent share prices up as much as 40% from their March lows may have been overdone.<span id="more-18162"></span></p>
<p>Traders have grown increasingly fearful in recent weeks that the powerful surge in the three major U.S. stock indices &#8211; one of the strongest in history &#8211; may not have been justified because of an ongoing economic recovery that’s not as strong as originally believed.</p>
<p>&#8220;There’s <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jmT59dgLTTziX4p9X9MRBRpWZGdQD98TVHO80" target="_blank">no question in my mind that the economy is improving</a>,&#8221; Phil Orlando, chief equity market strategist at Federated Investors, told <strong><em>The Associated Press</em></strong> on Friday. &#8220;But investors are betting on some sideways consolidation rather than a continuation of a sharp spike in share prices.&#8221;</p>
<p>All the major indexes closed the week down for the first time since the week of May 11. The <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> lost 3%, the<strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500 Index</a></strong> fell 2.6%, and the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq Composite Index</a></strong> 1.7%.</p>
<p>Stocks returned to the whipsaw trading pattern investors had grown wearily accustomed to in the months before the rally got under way.</p>
<p>Stocks fell early in the week as a handful of weak economic reports &#8211; including news that industrial production had fallen for the seventh straight month &#8211; contradicted other reports that seemed to depict a gradual improvement in the American economy.</p>
<p>But some modestly upbeat economic reports sent U.S. share prices up a bit on Thursday; one report demonstrated that <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/19/unemployment-claims/" target="_blank">the overall number of people drawing unemployment benefits fell last week for the first time since the start of January</a>.</p>
<p>But it wasn’t until stocks finished the day mixed on Friday &#8211; with financial, retail and tech shares gaining, while energy and utility shares dropped &#8211; that the three major indices finished with their first weekly loss since the start of May.</p>
<p>Last week was a loss. And the week before the three key indices each rose less than 1%.</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s not going to be a one-way ride,&#8221; Keith Walter, portfolio manager of Artio Global Equity Fund, told reporters.</p>
<p>Since periods of powerful market overperformance are usually followed by a period of sharp underperformance, institutional players have been looking for a down week.  Usually, a 40% surge like the one seen in the S&amp;P 500 index takes years to develop, not months.</p>
<p>But here’s the question: Does last week’s market pullback have more to go, or can it still move higher after two consecutive weeks of sideways trading?<br />
The conventional wisdom is calling for a stretch of choppy trading that will last through the summer, a period during which there’s low volume, until July when Corporate America begins announcing second-quarter earnings.</p>
<h4>Market Matters</h4>
<p>As the Dow finished the week in the “red,” it also turns out that its push into positive territory for the year was relatively short-lived.  Just one trading session beyond the index’s surge into the “black,” traders surveyed the economic landscape, evaluated the new regulatory environment, reconsidered the ballooning deficit (not even including health care) and chose to book some profits.  While the other major indexes remain profitable year-to-date, many investors believe the markets stand at a crossroad as they attempt to determine whether the recent move has been:</p>
<ul>
<li>A mere blip on the radar screen, amid a much-longer bear market.</li>
<li>A much-too-fast run-up for a rebounding economy that that still faces a plethora of challenges.</li>
<li>The start of a new bull market that simply is taking a week off to digest all the “euphoric” news.</li>
</ul>
<p>The analysts, TV pundits, and bloggers maintain no shortages of views about the markets’ future direction.  Only time will tell.</p>
<p>As expected, major financial institutions rushed to pay back $68 billion in Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) money and get out from under the strong arm of the government.</p>
<p><strong>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=jpm" target="_blank">JPM</a>)</strong>, <strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gs" target="_blank">GS</a>)</strong>, and <strong>Morgan Stanley</strong><strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMS" target="_blank">MS</a>) </strong>highlighted the list, while <strong>Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=csco" target="_blank">C</a>)</strong>, <strong>Wells Fargo &amp; Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=wfc" target="_blank">WFC</a>)</strong>, and <strong>Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong>are among those still seeking Uncle Sam’ approval for every action.<br />
Meanwhile, <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4907797" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s</a></strong> <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/17/sp-banks-2/" target="_blank">downgraded 18 related institutions</a>, including a few that paid back the bailout money - <strong>BB&amp;T Corp. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bbt" target="_blank">BBT</a>) </strong>and <strong>U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AUSB" target="_blank">USB</a></strong>) &#8211; and warned about the industry’s future</p>
<p>The Obama administration <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/18/obamas-financial-system/" target="_blank">revealed plans for the most significant financial regulatory overhaul since the Great Depression</a>.  The proposal expands the oversight role of the U.S. Federal Reserve, and includes higher capital and liquidity requirements, stricter reviews over hedge funds and certain derivative products, and the creation of a new consumer protection agency.  U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner detailed the plan before the Senate and was met with mixed (but predictable) reactions…Republicans thought it was excessive, while Dems felt it didn’t go far enough.</p>
<p>If both sides dislike it equally, perhaps it’s a good plan?</p>
<p>Volatility returns to the markets as the VIX (<a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/vix.asp" target="_blank">Chicago Board Option Exchange Volatility Index</a>) surged past the critical 30 mark early in the week, a sign generally associated with stock-market pessimism.  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/10/treasury-yields/" target="_blank">Bonds continued their ongoing roller-coaster ride</a> as some fixed-income investors remained concerned about the global demand for U.S. debt, while others turned to the asset class as a flight-to-quality from riskier securities.</p>
<p>The worries continued as both China and Japan reportedly cut back their treasury holdings in April, a worrisome development considering the upcoming Treasury auctions will add a record $104 billion of government securities to the Street.</p>
<p>Oil hovered around the $70 a barrel level and gas prices increased for 52 straight days as consumers began to feel the pinch just in time for the summer holiday travel season.  Options expiration from “quadruple-witching Friday” brought additional volatility as each major equity index gave back some ground for the week on less-than-favorable reports from the likes of <strong>Best Buy Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bby" target="_blank">BBY</a>)</strong> and<strong> FedEx Corp. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=fdx" target="_blank">FDX</a>).</strong></p>
<p align="center">
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="433" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (03/31/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(06/12/09)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(06/19/09)</strong></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">7,608.92</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,799.26<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,539.73</p>
</td>
<td width="95" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-2.70%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,528.59</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,858.80<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,827.47</p>
</td>
<td width="95" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+15.88%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">797.87</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">946.21<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">921.23</p>
</td>
<td width="95" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+1.99%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">422.75</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">526.84<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">512.72</p>
</td>
<td width="95" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+2.66%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1347.38</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,694.76<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,633.70</p>
</td>
<td width="95" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+7.04%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="95" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.68%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.79%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.79%</p>
</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+155 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3><strong>Economically Speaking</strong></h3>
<p>While U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke will be gaining enhanced powers under the federal financial system makeover, he must be wondering whether he will be around to experience them.  Despite the unprecedented challenges he has faced over the past few years, U.S. President Barack Obama has been tightlipped about whether he will reappoint Bernanke for another term when the central bank chairman’s current stint expires in January.</p>
<p>“Ben Bernanke has handled his position extraordinarily well under extraordinary circumstances…but I’m not going to make news on that right now,&#8221; President Obama said.</p>
<p>Some Fed watchers believe that President Obama has Lawrence Summers, the former U.S. Treasury secretary and present National Economic Council chairman, in mind for the position.</p>
<p>On the economic front, inflation data highlighted the week’s releases as both producer price index (PPI) and the consumer price index (CPI) for May were reported as below expectations.  While certain naysayers pressed forward on the scary “deflation” argument, other naysayers point to the rapid rise in energy prices as proof that the dreaded “I” word is merely lurking on the horizon.</p>
<p>For now, however, inflation is not considered “Public Enemy No. 1″ and economists will focus on housing, labor, and manufacturing for more signs of economic stability.</p>
<p>Turning to housing, new construction climbed by its largest amount in three months and even building permits jumped in May as prospects for the future look more promising.  Bear in mind, however, homebuilding activity still remains more than 45% below last year’s levels.</p>
<p>Industrial production fell more than 1% in May as automakers <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4090940" target="_blank">Chrysler Group LLC</a></strong> and <strong>General Motors Corp. (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AGMGMQ" target="_blank">GMGMQ</a>)</strong> continued shutting down plants and limiting production as they initiated their restructuring plans.  While initial jobless claims actually increased slightly in its most recent weekly release, total insurance claims actually fell for the first time in five months.  Still, the labor market remains the primary concern as the economy begins to show some signs of improvement.</p>
<p>On that note, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/19/leading-economic-indicators/" target="_blank">the leading economic indicators (LEI), an index thought to forecast</a> economic activity for the next three to six months, experienced its best showing since March 2004.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="306" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 16</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">PPI (05/09)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Increase not as significant as expected</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Housing Starts (05/09)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Best showing in three months</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Industrial Production  (05/09)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Negatively impacted by auto plant closures</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 17</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">CPI (05/09)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Largest 12-month decline since April 1950</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 18</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (06/13/09)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1st drop in total jobless benefits since January</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Leading Eco. Indicators (05/09)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Most optimistic report since March 2004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 23</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Existing Home Sales (05/09)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 24</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Durable Goods Orders (05/09)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">New Home Sales (05/09)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Policy Meeting</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 25</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (06/20/09)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">GDP (1st qtr revised)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 26</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Personal Income/Spending (05/09)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source:  <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/22/economic-recovery-2/">Market Stumble Heightens Worries That Economic Rebound May Not Be That Strong</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/market-stumble-heightens-worries-that-economic-rebound-may-not-be-that-strong/18162/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Ramping Up Wind Power Programs Even As Concerns Surface About Possible Declines In U.S. Wind Strength</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/us-ramping-up-wind-power-programs-even-as-concerns-surface-about-possible-declines-in-us-wind-strength/18140</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/us-ramping-up-wind-power-programs-even-as-concerns-surface-about-possible-declines-in-us-wind-strength/18140#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Investment & Alternative Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Turbines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just as the United States is boosting its reliance on wind power, a new academic study set for release in August says that U.S. wind forces may be getting weaker.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/faculty/takle/">Eugene S. Takle</a>, a professor of atmospheric science at Iowa State University, and the director of the school’s “<a href="http://climate.agron.iastate.edu/">climate science initiative</a>,” says the research study concluded that U.S. wind strength has potentially declined by 15% to 30% during the past 30 years &#8211; an average decline of as much as 1% a year.</p>
<p>While conducting the study &#8211; which will appear in the <strong><em><a href="http://www.agu.org/journals/jd/">Journal of Geophysical Research</a> </em></strong> &#8211; researchers reviewed wind data taken at airports around the United States, and then based their findings on two sets of figures: One set from 1973-2000, and&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as the United States is boosting its reliance on wind power, a new academic study set for release in August says that U.S. wind forces may be getting weaker.<span id="more-18140"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/faculty/takle/">Eugene S. Takle</a>, a professor of atmospheric science at Iowa State University, and the director of the school’s “<a href="http://climate.agron.iastate.edu/">climate science initiative</a>,” says the research study concluded that U.S. wind strength has potentially declined by 15% to 30% during the past 30 years &#8211; an average decline of as much as 1% a year.</p>
<p>While conducting the study &#8211; which will appear in the <strong><em><a href="http://www.agu.org/journals/jd/">Journal of Geophysical Research</a> </em></strong> &#8211; researchers reviewed wind data taken at airports around the United States, and then based their findings on two sets of figures: One set from 1973-2000, and the other from 1973-2005.</p>
<p>The study concluded that three factors could be contributing to the declines in U.S. wind strength: Land-use changes, a changing climate and changes in the kind of instruments used to measure the wind, Takle told <strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em></strong>.</p>
<p>“If there have been trees growing or new buildings constructed near airports, it could impact the speed of winds on airports,&#8221; Takle said. However, it is also “[basic] meteorology that the wind is driven by differences in temperature between the poles and the equator, and those differences have been narrowed by climate change.”</p>
<h3>Tough Timing</h3>
<p>The findings come at time when the United States is making a serious push to increase the amount of electricity that’s generated by wind turbines grouped into so-called wind-power “farms.” Attempts to harness the wind are part of a broader national &#8211; or even global &#8211; commitment to “green” energy sources as a way of reducing dependence on oil and other fossil fuels for power generation.</p>
<p>Other power sources include solar, geothermal, hydroelectric and nuclear for commercial electricity production, while automakers are looking at new types of batteries and such innovations as power-storing “fuel cells” as alternatives to the conventional internal combustion engines that power most of the world’s cars and trucks.</p>
<p>The objectives are twofold. By decreasing the U.S. reliance on foreign oil, the country is hedging against the time when global supplies of the “black gold” begin to dry up, an eventuality that will propel the prices of crude and gasoline skyward. Diversifying away from oil and, perhaps, even coal is also a way of reversing &#8211; or at least slowing &#8211; environmentally ruinous (and politically controversial) global warming.</p>
<p>President Barack Obama is attempting to use the ongoing financial crisis to create a sense of urgency about America’s energy future, a challenge that no prior administration has yet been able to meet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/21/the-obama-blueprint-for-solving-the-us-financial-crisis/">About one-third of President Obama’s $800 billion-plus stimulus package</a>will go to infrastructure, with $30 billion allocated for U.S. roads and highways and another $10 billion earmarked for railways and mass-transit systems.</p>
<p>President Obama has also proposed spending $150 billion “over the next 10 years to catalyze private efforts to build a clean energy future.” The administration also proposes to <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2009/02/upgrading-the-u.html">increase the amount of electricity that comes from renewable resources from 10% in 2012 to 25% by 2025</a>,<em><strong>Wall Street 24/7</strong></em> reported in early January.</p>
<p>Creating the power is only part of the problem. Delivering it will be a challenge, too, especially given the country’s aging power grid. Upgrading that <a href="http://www.edisonfoundation.net/Transforming_Americas_Power_Industry.pdf">aging equipment is expected to cost more than $880 billion</a>, according to a November 2008 report from the Brattle Group.</p>
<h3>An Energy Boon For Entrepreneur T. Boone?</h3>
<p>In many cases, those federal outlays will serve only as seed capital. It will likely fall to innovators in the U.S. private sector to really energize the alternative-power market.</p>
<p>One key player is legendary oilman and venture capitalist T. Boone Pickens, who has <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/07/08/former-oilman-t-boone-pickens-taps-wind-power-natural-gas-to-replace-foreign-oil/">unveiled a plan to cut U.S. dependence on foreign oil through the power of alternatives such as wind and natural gas</a>, <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a></em></strong> reported last July.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2008-07-08-t-boone-pickens-plan-wind-energy_N.htm">We’re paying $700 billion a year for foreign oil</a>. It’s breaking us as a nation,” Pickens said at the time. Former U.S. President Richard M. Nixon “said in 1970 that we were importing 20% of our oil and that by 1980 it would be 0%. That didn’t happen. It went to 42% in 1991 with the Gulf War. It’s just under 70% now. Where do you think we’re going to be in 10 years when our economy is busted and we’re importing 80% of our oil?”</p>
<p>Pickens wants to create what he calls a “bridge to the future” that will help cut slash the U.S. reliance on imported foreign oil by focusing on two specific alternatives:</p>
<ul>
<li>Cars that burn natural gas instead of gasoline.</li>
<li>And electricity generated by wind power.</li>
</ul>
<p>There’s a smooth and elegant logic to his strategy: By constructing electric-generating wind-power farms, the United States can free up natural gas supplies that currently generate 22% of the nation’s electricity. That natural gas can then be used to power cleaner-burning cars and trucks, thereby reducing our dependence on imported oil while also reducing the damage to the environment. This will also buy time for the development of other, even-greener, alternative sources of energy.</p>
<h3>Pickens’ Wind Power Project</h3>
<p>According to Pickens, wind power could eventually fulfill as much as 20% of the United States’ energy needs. Calling the Great Plains region of the United States the “Saudi Arabia of wind,” Pickens last summer launched plans for a $10 billion alternative energy project in the Texas panhandle that has the potential to one day become the world’s largest wind-power farm.</p>
<p>Picken’s Mesa Power LLP <a href="http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2008/05/pickens-mesa-po.html">plans to purchase 667 wind turbines</a> from U.S. industrial giant General Electric Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ge">GE</a>). Each turbine can produce 1.5 megawatts of electricity &#8211; enough to provide <a href="http://www.oregonpowersolutions.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=15&amp;Itemid=35">the ongoing power needs of 360 to 600 U.S. homes</a>, according to <strong><em>Money Morning</em></strong>calculations based on statistics provided by <a href="http://www.oregonpowersolutions.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=blogcategory&amp;id=13&amp;Itemid=27">Oregon Power Solutions Inc</a>., a Baker City, OR consulting firm.</p>
<p>The first phase of the Pickens project, already under construction, will produce 1,000 megawatts of electricity, enough energy to power 300,000 homes. GE will begin delivering the turbines in 2010, and current plans call for the project to start producing power in 2011.</p>
<p>Ultimately, Mesa Power plans to have enough turbines to produce 4,000 megawatts of energy. Overall, the “Pampa Wind Mill” project is expected to cost $10 billion and be completed in 2014.</p>
<p>Pickens has launched a “<a href="http://www.pickensplan.com/index.php">Pickens Plan</a>” Web site, which is urges the country’s “energy army” to lobby Congress for funding and a commitment to green-energy projects.</p>
<h3>Other Players Showing Interest</h3>
<p>An Irish company &#8211; its interest in the U.S. alternative energy market piqued by the green-technology money included in the Obama administration’s stimulus package &#8211; on Monday <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-tue-wind-farm-jun16,0,3941496.story">acquired three Illinois wind farms located within 100 miles of Chicago</a>, <strong><em>The Chicago Tribune</em></strong>reported.</p>
<p>Plans call for the Dublin-based <a href="http://www.mainstreamrp.com/pages/About-Us.html">Mainstream Renewable Power</a> to invest $1.69 billion over four years to develop the wind farms. The purchase price was not disclosed.</p>
<p>&#8220;The U.S. market is of strategic importance to Mainstream, and the scale of the opportunity is strongly reflected in President Obama’s economic stimulus package, which includes $56 billion in grants and tax breaks for U.S. clean energy projects over the next 10 years and a budget of $15 billion a year to fund renewable energy programs,&#8221; Mainstream co-founder and Chief Executive Officer Eddie O’Connor said in a statement. “The administration’s goal of generating 25% of the nation’s electricity from renewable energy sources by 2025 will help revitalize the U.S. economy and protect consumers.&#8221;</p>
<p>The farms have the potential to generate 787 megawatts of electricity by 2013, <strong><em>The Tribune</em></strong> said. The most advanced is the 120-megawatt Shady Oaks project in Lee County. When finished next year, it should be able to generate enough electricity to power about 30,000 homes, Mainstream said.</p>
<p>The other two wind-power farms are the 467-megawatt Green River project, also in Lee County, and a 200-megawatt project set for Boone County. Construction on the Green River project will begin next year, while the Boone County project is still in is development stages.</p>
<p>This is Mainstream’s second North American deal in three months; it earlier announced a Canadian wind farm project. It has also announced plans to build a wind farm in Chile.</p>
<p>Founded a year ago, Mainstream was created to build and operate wind-energy, solar-thermal and ocean-current power plants in partnerships with government agencies, electric utilities, developers and investors in North and South America, Europe, and South Africa. Barclays Capital (NYSE ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABCS">BCS</a>) has a 14.6% stake in Mainstream.</p>
<h3>Going Global</h3>
<p>As Mainstream’s proposed forays into South America, Europe and Africa demonstrate, the push to harness the wind isn’t limited to the United States.</p>
<p>As of the end of last year, worldwide wind-powered generators were capable of generating 121.2 gigawatts (GW) of electricity. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power">Wind power produces about 1.5% of the world’s electricity</a> and its use is surging: The amount of electricity generated by wind power doubled between 2005 and 2008 alone.</p>
<p>Several countries have already embraced wind power in a major way: As of last year, it accounted for 19% of electricity production in Denmark, 11% in both Spain and Portugal and an estimated 7% in both Germany and Ireland. As of this May, 80 nations around the world were using wind power on a commercial basis.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, China is making a big push to commercialize wind power and by last year was already the world’s sixth-largest user of wind-generated electricity. The country’s largest manufacturer of wind turbines - <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Xinjiang+Goldwind+Science+%26+Technology+Co.+Ltd.">Xinjiang Goldwind Science &amp; Technology Co. Ltd.</a> &#8211; went public last year, raising nearly $250 million. It has about 33% of China’s wind-power-equipment market, according to <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=KGI+Securities+Co.+Ltd.">KGI Securities Co. Ltd.,</a> a Taiwan investment-banking and brokerage firm.</p>
<p>&#8220;As China’s wind power sector takes off, we think Goldwind is well positioned to become a major beneficiary, thanks to its strong brand and first mover advantage,” KGI wrote in a research report.</p>
<h3>Not a Complete Answer</h3>
<p>Although wind power has substantial promise, it’s not an infallible energy solution, and has some serious limitations &#8211; as the U.S. wind-power study shows. For one thing, although an estimated 72 terawatts of wind power on Earth can be potentially commercially viable &#8211; an amount that’s six times the estimated <a title="World energy resources and consumption" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_resources_and_consumption">15 terawatts of total power usage on earth &#8211; not all the wind energy flowing past any given point can be recovered.</a></p>
<p>Accoridng to a science axiom known as Betz’s Law &#8211; named for the German physicist,  <a title="Albert Betz" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Betz">Albert Betz</a>, who discovered the rule in 1919 - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betz%27_law">no turbine can capture more than 59.3% of the potential energy in wind</a>.</p>
<p>And there are other challenges, some of which are caused by the natural lay of the land in a given location. In the United States, for instance, where there are now concerns about diminishing wind strength, some coastal areas may retain wind strength because of the greater temperature differences between the land and the ocean.</p>
<p>Given the growing importance of wind power, more study will be required.</p>
<p>Concludes the study: “Given the importance of the wind-energy industry to meeting federal and state mandates for increased use of renewable energy supplies and the impact of changing wind regimes on a variety of other industries and physical processes, further research on wind climate variability and evolution is required.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/19/wind-power-programs/">U.S. Ramping Up Wind Power Programs Even As Concerns Surface About Possible Declines In U.S. Wind Strength</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/us-ramping-up-wind-power-programs-even-as-concerns-surface-about-possible-declines-in-us-wind-strength/18140/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>G8 Finance Chiefs Express Cautious Optimism About the State of the World Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/g8-finance-chiefs-express-cautious-optimism-about-the-state-of-the-world-economy/17890</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/g8-finance-chiefs-express-cautious-optimism-about-the-state-of-the-world-economy/17890#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AXXP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIATY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Derivatives Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMGMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<h4>Top financial officials from the <a href="http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761589420/Group_of_Eight.html" target="_blank">Group of Eight</a> (G8) industrialized nations on Friday issued an upbeat evaluation of the global financial crisis, describing signs that markets were stabilizing around the world and warning that it was necessary to devise “exit strategies” to disengage from stimulus programs that have been put in place.<br />
</h4>
<p>The G8 met for two days in Lecce, Italy. Eight world finance ministers – including U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, and his global counterparts from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Russia – also agreed to create &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/13/AR2009061301479.html?hpid=sec-business" target="_blank">a set of common principles and standards</a> governing the conduct of international business and finance,&#8221;<strong><em>The Washington Post</em></strong> reported.</p>
<p>In a communiqué called &#8220;the Lecce Framework&#8221; – which described the strategy for obtaining those goals –&#8230;</p></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<h4><span style="font-weight: normal;">Top financial officials from the <a href="http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761589420/Group_of_Eight.html" target="_blank">Group of Eight</a> (G8) industrialized nations on Friday issued an upbeat evaluation of the global financial crisis, describing signs that markets were stabilizing around the world and warning that it was necessary to devise “exit strategies” to disengage from stimulus programs that have been put in place.<span id="more-17890"></span><br />
</span></h4>
<p>The G8 met for two days in Lecce, Italy. Eight world finance ministers – including U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, and his global counterparts from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Russia – also agreed to create &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/13/AR2009061301479.html?hpid=sec-business" target="_blank">a set of common principles and standards</a> governing the conduct of international business and finance,&#8221;<strong><em>The Washington Post</em></strong> reported.</p>
<p>In a communiqué called &#8220;the Lecce Framework&#8221; – which described the strategy for obtaining those goals – the finance ministers called on government leaders to fill in the regulatory gaps that led to the global financial crisis, including breakdowns caused by financial firms that operated in multiple economies.</p>
<p>Strikingly more rigorous initiatives already are being adopted in Europe, where new measures aimed at creating more-rigorous oversight of the credit-rating agencies – especially those involved with creating securitized securities, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/18/debt-rating-agencies/" target="_blank">whose U.S. breakdowns have been identified as a key contributor</a> to the credit crisis. The United States will offer its own broad proposals for &#8220;more conservative standards&#8221; when it unveils a much-anticipated reform plan to overhaul domestic financial regulation later this week, Geithner said in an interview after the meeting.</p>
<p>The U.S. will include tougher proposed capital standards and oversight for banks, better coordinated oversight of global financial institutions, and improve monitoring and transparency in global derivatives markets,<strong><em>The Post</em></strong> reported.</p>
<p>&#8220;Because risk does not respect borders, we will put forward several international proposals in our reform package to help raise standards globally,&#8221; Geithner told journalists after the meeting.</p>
<p>With recent rebound in stock markets and a flurry of upbeat economic reports, finance ministers said they were cautiously optimistic about the state of the world economy.</p>
<h4>Market Matters</h4>
<p>Despite some last minute drama at <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/index.html" target="_blank">U.S. Supreme Court</a>, <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4090940" target="_blank">Chrysler LLC</a> </strong>closed on its deal with <strong>Fiat SpA (OTC ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AFIATY" target="_blank">FIATY</a>) </strong>and effectively moved beyond bankruptcy.  While Supreme Court Justice <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AFIATY" target="_blank">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</a> gave the would-be deal-breakers (Indiana pension funds) some false hope, the Supreme Court ultimately disallowed their objections and<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/10/chrysler-fiat/" target="_blank">let the transaction proceed</a>.</p>
<p><strong>General Motors Corp. (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AGMGMQ" target="_blank">GMGMQ</a>) </strong>announced the hiring of a former<strong>AT&amp;T</strong> <strong>Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AT" target="_blank">T</a>)</strong> exec to guide its rebirth and moved closer to selling its Saab unit as it “speeds” through its own restructuring.</p>
<p>In a “sign of financial repair,” the U.S. Treasury Department has granted its blessing to 10 major banks to repay $68 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) loans; <strong><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=jpm" target="_blank">JPMorgan Chase</a> &amp; Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJPM" target="_blank">JPM</a>)</strong> ($25 bln), <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=ms" target="_blank">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMS" target="_blank">MS</a><strong>)</strong>($10 bln), and <strong><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=axp" target="_blank">American Express</a>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AAXP" target="_blank">AXP</a>) </strong>($3.4 bln) expect to take the plunge in the next few days.</p>
<p>And in a sign of renewed economic strength, <strong>Texas Instruments Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATXN" target="_blank">TXN</a>)</strong> raised its outlook for the second quarter amid growing demand for semiconductors.  Meanwhile, <strong>Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC" target="_blank">BAC</a>) </strong>and U.S. Federal Reserve officials took a grilling from (grandstanding) politicos as the “he said/he said” controversy over the<strong>Merrill Lynch (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASAR" target="_blank">SAR</a>)</strong> acquisition continued.  The Obama administration ended its plan to limit compensation within financials and also is reevaluating prior proposals about consolidating regulatory bodies.</p>
<p>In transactional news, <strong>BlackRock Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABLK" target="_blank">BLK</a>) </strong>acquired ETF-giant<strong>Barclays Global Investors</strong> to form <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/blackrock-barclays/" target="_blank">the largest global asset manager</a>.</p>
<p>Energy prices continued the upward trek as an <a href="http://www.iea.org/" target="_blank">International Energy Agency</a> suggested that global demand for 2009 would be stronger than previously predicted.  On the supply side, a <strong>BP PLC</strong> <strong>(NYSE ADR: <a href="nyse:BP" target="_blank">BP</a>)</strong>report showed that global reserves fell in 2008, the first such decline in 10-years.  Crude surged past $72 a barrel for the first time this year as traders analyzed the supply/demand issues in conjunction with the ongoing prospects for an economic recovery.  Likewise, gas prices rose again (for 42 straight days) to above $2.60 per gallon nationally and consumers began to feel the pinch at the pumps as summer travel season arrives.  Inflation anyone?</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="444" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (03/31/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(06/05/09)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(06/12/09)</strong></td>
<td width="78" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">7,608.92</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,763.13<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,799.26</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+0.26%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,528.59</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,849.42<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,858.80</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+17.87%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">797.87</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">940.09<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">946.21</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+4.76%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">422.75</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">530.36<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">526.84</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+5.48%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1347.38</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,680.43<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,694.76</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+11.04%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.68%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.86%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.79%</p>
</td>
<td width="78" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>155 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>Economically Speaking</h4>
<p>Economists are at it again.  With little substantive data on the calendar,<strong><em>The Wall Street Journal </em></strong>announced results of its latest forecasting survey and a majority of respondents expect the recession to end by late summer (though the subsequent recovery may not be as swift as many had hoped).  About half even believe the Fed will be inclined to raise the benchmark Federal Funds rate (from virtually 0% today) by the middle of 2010.  Despite the potential for an economic rebound, the labor market is expected to remain weak as unemployment is projected to climb just below 10% by the end of the year.</p>
<p>On the inflation front, the rapid rise in oil prices does not seem to be worrying most economists surveyed (or they simply have not been paying attention), as they pegged the price of crude at $72 a barrel by December 2010, very close to today’s level.</p>
<p>Retail sales rose in May for the first time in three months, though much of the increase reflected rising gasoline prices which is bad news for a consumer-driven economy. Discretionary spending seems to be going to the gas pumps rather than for household or luxury items.  Still, consumer sentiment is improving as the latest <strong>Reuters/University of Michigan confidence index</strong> rose to its highest level in nine months.</p>
<p>The trade deficit jumped for the second month in a row as oil imports climbed, also the result of higher crude prices.  Home foreclosures actually declined in May, a positive sign for housing, though its elevated level was still the third highest ever reported.  The Fed &#8220;<a href="http://www.investorwords.com/451/Beige_Book.html" target="_blank">Beige Book</a>&#8220; <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/12/report-predicts-recession-ending/" target="_blank">was released during the week and the messages were mixed</a>, at best.  While certain regions of the country have begun to experience resurgence in economic activity (or, at least, less contraction), others remained quite weak and ongoing challenges in the labor markets threaten to hinder any sustained recovery.  Despite the recent increase in interest rates, many Fed watchers do not expect the policymakers to commit to additional Treasury and mortgage-related securities purchases at the next open market committee meeting.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="271" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 10</td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Balance of Trade (04/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Deficit expanded for 2nd month in row</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Beige Book</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Economy remains weak with signs of recession easing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 11</td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Retail Sales (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Strong showing, but due to rising gas prices</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (06/06/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">19th straight week of record continuing claims</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 16</td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">PPI (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Housing Starts (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Industrial Production  (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">June 17</td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">CPI (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">.</td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (06/13/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="112" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Leading Eco. Indicators (05/09)</td>
<td width="106" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/15/g8-global-economy/">G8 Finance Chiefs Express Cautious Optimism About the State of the World Economy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/g8-finance-chiefs-express-cautious-optimism-about-the-state-of-the-world-economy/17890/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.825 seconds -->

