In the 1950s, one argument stated that short-term market activity results in the law of one price – i.e., that buying and selling mispriced shares of the same stock forces a single price to dominate.

Then came the “modern portfolio theory,” which claimed that investors simply couldn’t beat the market averages. This so-called “market efficiency theory” was the impetus behind the formation of the Vanguard 500 Index Fund (NYSE: VFINX) – the world’s largest mutual fund.

Score one for the stuffy “efficiency theorists.”

But while they congratulated each other over brandy and cigars, a little-known professor spoiled the party in the 1980s with a straightforward study that is still the driving force behind one of the most lucrative wealth-building approaches today…

Forget “Market Efficiency”… Here’s the Best Way to Beat the Market

The study simply categorized companies by market capitalization (shares outstanding times share price). The 10 divisions ranged from small to large – and research proved that small firms consistently outperformed their larger cousins for many decades.

And it’s now widely accepted that this “small firm effect” is arguably the best way for investors to beat the market.

And the logic in seeking out small firms is sound. After all, Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) and hundreds of other mega-companies all started as small firms.

It’s what we like to call the “white cap” effect…

The Perfect “White Cap” Stock – Five Common Characteristics

The beauty of “white cap” stocks is that they feature a powerful, earnings-boosting blend of three “market efficiency” anomalies – momentum, value and IPOs.

• White Cap Stock Factor #1: Products That Satisfy Unmet Market Need

One of the key traits of a good momentum stock is that the company has an exciting new product(s) that fulfills an unmet consumer need.

Take Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), for example. With consumers across the world clamoring forApple products, the stock has refuted the “market efficiency” approach and delivered outstanding returns for investors.

The White Cap Report remit: Target very small firms with products that supply an unmet market worth at least $1 billion.

• White Cap Stock Factor #2: Company is a Stock Market Newcomer

Many investors shy away from Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) because they’re too unknown and unproven in the stock market.

But invest properly and the risk is certainly worth the reward. Plus, you can mitigate risk by only picking small firms that have received an upgrade from an over-the-counter (OTC) stock to a major exchange. It also ensures that you’re not buying into a penny stock, which really ratchets up the risk.

• White Cap Stock Factor #3: Low Debt

When people and institutions buy bonds from a publicly traded firm, that money has to be paid back plus interest.

This is why bondholders (debt) can sometimes hurt regular shareholders. Debt puts a drain on building assets like cash, and as debt rises, shareholder value drops.

• White Cap Stock Factor #4: Low Competition and High Barriers to Entry

Warren Buffett, the greatest stock investor in the world, looks for companies in industries with high-entry barriers and low-exit barriers. Why? Because it’s difficult for any serious competition to join the industry.

The wisdom behind this approach is that poorly managed, unprofitable firms can get out easily without resorting to desperate price gouging – something that would cause a consumer bidding war and damage the well-managed firm’s profitability.

• White Cap Stock Factor #5: No Analyst Coverage

Watch shows like “Mad Money” on CNBC and you get a sense that Wall Street’s attitude is, “If the public wants stocks, we’ll give ‘em stocks.”

Thing is, though, lots of companies aren’t recommended to make you wealthy… but to fatten up commissions for Wall Street firms.

In fact, there are numerous studies that show that Wall Street analysts are absolutely untrustworthy. For example…

• They’re perpetually bullish and are pressured by CEOs, fund managers and supervisors not to downgrade a stock. This means the public is almost never told when they should really sell a stock. The reality is that when there’s a fire in the house, Wall Street opens the exits for its “good ol’ boys” first and leaves you behind to get burned.
• They often recommend the same stock as other prominent analysts. So if he’s following her, and she’s following him, just who the heck is doing any meaningful “research” on Wall Street?!
• They’ve been caught “front-running” – i.e., recommending stocks that prominent investors, investment houses and employee option-vested Wall Street executives are trying to sell for an obscene profit. This was particularly true in 1999 and 2000, where the vast majority of top executives cashed out, even while analysts where overwhelmingly bullish across the board.

Finding White Cap Stocks With The White Cap Report

This is where The White Cap Report differs. The goal is to find firms that Wall Street has no clue about. It makes sure few if any analysts covers the stock. This way, the waters don’t get muddied and you’re able to get in before the market does, sending the price upward.

All five of these “white cap factors” are essential parts of the investment formula that The White Cap Report team follows in identifying the small-cap stocks packed with the most profit potential – a formula that has proved extremely successful.

The results speak for themselves. In the last month alone they’ve locked-in two 100% gains and a solid 35% gain. Not to mention, their current portfolio contains another seven winning picks.

Source: “White Cap” Stocks: The Best Way For Investors To Beat The Market

It has been a tough week if you have anything to do with the world of retail. Just about every company that opened its books to the Street this week got punished for the act.

The list of “disappointing” reports is getting longer by the day.

Lowes (NYSE:LOW) kicked off the week with scary-low figures. Home Depot (NYSE:HD) beat the Street but still got punished after a slew of less-than-stellar economic reports.

Outside of the home-centric sector, shares of Liz Claiborne (NYSE:LIZ) plummeted on Monday after the Standard and Poor’s cut its rating on the unprofitable retailer to B, a two-notch downgrade. The company’s rating now stands five levels below investment grade.

High-end retailer Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE:ANF) is also deep in negative territory for the week after succumbing to industry pressure and a downgrade from Susquehanna.

Obviously, the market believes a business model that focuses on trendy, expensive clothing is not a place to be during a deep, protracted recession.

And of course, there is Eddie Lampert and his Sears Holding (NYSE:SHLD). While the store may be the hideout of choice for any enslaved husband while his wife shops for new bed linens, fewer of us our purchasing the store’s products.

Shares of the company are down by double-digit proportions today after Sears announced it lost $94 million over the past three months. It is tough to make a profit when revenues are plunging by 10% (12.5 for comparable-store sales).

Essentials only investing

If consumers are not spending their money at the high-end stores or paying to fix up their house, where are they spending it? After all, there is no choice but to spend money on the essentials at the very least.

The key is understanding which retailers are stocked up on the essentials. Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) and Target (NYSE:TGT) are the first to come to mind.

And guess what… shares of Target are up on the week and Wal-Mart is just slightly in negative territory.

One of the most appealing sectors of the retail market is the ultra-cheap (in price and quality) “dollar store” segment. As the market breaks out its magnifying glass in an attempt to find any signs of so-called green shoots, shares of company’s like Family Dollar (NYSE:FDO) and 99 Cents Only (NYSE:NDN) have dropped from their recent highs.

The discounting is a mistake. Today’s unexpected surge in first-time jobless claims (a jump of 15,000 claims) proves tens of thousands of American consumers are still at risk of losing their jobs. That means they won’t be shelling out their reserves any time soon.

Instead, they will continue their spendthrift shopping.

While there are sectors much more likely to hand you sizeable profits in the near future, no portfolio is healthy unless it is properly diversified.

If you need exposure to the nation’s retail market, look at the big guys like Wal-Mart and Target or the small discount retailers where a buck will buy you just about anything… but a share of the company.

Finally, if you have been playing this sector or have your eye on any big movers, your fellow readers would love to hear about it. Drop us a line and let us know your thoughts.

Source: Dangerous Retail: The Sector That Refuses to Recover

You see, as a small-cap investor, you’ve got very different concerns compared to those who only buy and sell blue chips. One of those concerns is order execution. And most likely, it’s something that you haven’t heard about anywhere else…

That’s because for the most part, order execution is a term that’s relegated to the big players – firms like Goldman Sachs and T. Rowe Price that have teams devoted solely to proper order execution. But penny stock investors have many of the same order execution concerns on tiny, thinly traded stocks that the big Wall Street firms do with companies like GE and Microsoft (NYSE:MSFT).

But before we get down to brass tacks, let’s take a look at what order execution means…

Order execution is the process that swings into action when you try to buy or sell a stock. When most investors place an order with their brokers, execution is nearly instant. But when small-caps are concerned, thin trading volume can play havoc with share prices and with your profit or loss.

It’s important to remember that as its name implies, the stock market is a market. That means that stocks move based on supply and demand, and not necessarily their intrinsic value. While that works well for heavily traded stocks like Exxon Mobil  (NYSE:XOM) or Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT), where thousands of investors keep shares around their fair value by buying and selling millions of shares each day, some small-caps only trade a few hundred shares during any given trading session – some trade even less than that.

As a result, penny stock share prices can sometimes deviate pretty far from where they should be. And while that can provide prescient investors with a whole lot of profit potential, it can also be a big problem for those who don’t protect themselves.

Understanding Bid-Ask Spreads

Like mentioned before, stocks trade in a market. In markets, prices are set by the participants – in this case individual and institutional investors who buy and sell shares of stock. There are two pieces of price information for any stock: the bid, which represents how much investors are willing to pay for a stock, and the ask, which represents how much current shareholders are willing to sell for. When those two numbers intersect, a trade happens.

The bid and ask aren’t hypothetical numbers – they represent real outstanding orders.

For any stock, there’s a separation between the bid and the ask, knownas the spread. If someone’s willing to sell shares of Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) for $16.84 and another person’s wiling to buy shares for $16.83, your bid-ask spread is one cent. The spread is kept small by the large number of traders in the stock, who volley back and forth maintaining a tight range for BAC’s share price.

But for a stock that’s more thinly traded, spreads can be huge. That’s a big problem for small-cap investors because a spread that span’s 2% to 3% of a stock’s share price can essentially shear that kind of performance from their position from the get go.

And starting out 3% in the red from the second you buy shares of a stock isn’t a good deal…

When you’re missing out on 3% of every trade, that disadvantage begins to add up big time. But follow these three secrets, and you can ensure that you’re making out on your small-cap trades:

1. Love Liquidity

The best way to avoid being burned by a lack of liquidity is to only trade stocks that have enough trading activity to keep share prices in a reasonable range. And while that may sound limiting to some investors, the truth is that there are ample investing opportunities in small-caps that still see decent trading volume on the market.

As a general rule, if a stock doesn’t trade thousands of shares during any trading day, it’s best to keep your distance.

2. Use a Limit Order

Market orders are a bad idea for small-cap investors. That’s because they automatically execute at the price necessary to make a trade, meaning that every time you initiate a market order to buy shares of stock, you’re rising up to meet the price the seller wants. With huge spreads common in small-caps, market caps are a sure way to lose money from the get go. Instead, use a limit order.

Limit orders are essentially market orders that only execute below a certain price when you’re buying shares, or above a certain price when you’re selling. They’ll help ensure that your entries and exits are happening at prices you set, not the other party.

3. Beware of Promotions

Stock promotion is a popular way for small-cap companies to increase daily trading volume. The practice, which often employs dubious ethics, involves hiring firms that spread good news or sentiment about a tiny stock. But being on the wrong end of that strong sentiment can be a very bad thing. Since volume in small-caps is often so thin, the huge volume surges caused by stock promoters can sometimes move a stock’s share price by more than 20%.

To avoid getting into stocks that are being manipulated, check out promoters’ favorite places – investing message boards and press release websites – for over hyped language that goes beyond what one of the company’s shareholders would spout off. If you see the same language in multiple locations, chances are that a promotion is underway.

The stock market is a tricky enough place to operate. After all, there’s no way to guarantee that the next stock you pick will deliver 100% profits. And there’s no telling whether the company you just added to your portfolio is a sure thing. But even with all of that uncertainty, you don’t have to give away your gains before you place a trade. Now you’ve got three ways to make sure that order execution mistakes don’t squeeze your profits.

Cheers,
Jonas Elmerraji

Source: 3 Secrets to Profitable Small-Cap Order Execution

Video rental king Netflix Inc. (Nasdaq: NFLX) years ago usurped Blockbuster Inc. (NYSE: BBI)’s throne as the No. 1 video rental outlet, but now it’s focused on cementing its status as the market leader as other video rental companies struggle to play catch-up.

Blockbuster, still king of brick-and-mortar rental stores, learned first hand the threat an innovative upstart can pose when it ran up against Netflix’s DVD-by-mail business model.

With movie theater tickets costing upwards of $10 (and that’s not including the popcorn or sodas), Netflix’s $8.99 1-DVD plan with unlimited exchanges and streaming video access represents a decidedly better deal for consumers that are tightening their spending amid rising unemployment and waning confidence.

Netflix celebrated its 10 millionth subscriber in February, noting that it added more than 600,000 net subscribers since the beginning of the year. In its second quarter ended June 30, Netflix said it had a total of 10.6 million subscribers, with paid subscribers representing 98% of the membership. The company expects its total membership to rise to between 11.6 million to 12 million by the end of the year, upping its previous quarter’s guidance of 11.2 million and 11.8 million.

Churn, a measurement of customer cancellations, rose to 4.5% in the second quarter from 4.2% a year ago, Netflix said.

“It could be the economy,” Netflix Chief Executive Officer Reed Hastings said of increasing churn in an interview with The Motley Fool. “It could also be that we make it very easy for subscribers to put their accounts on hold if they go on vacation or don’t have enough money for a month or two. When a subscriber goes on hold, we count that as a cancellation. What you can look at – as a good stable indicator – are net additions. And net additions continue to grow.”

Netflix’s top and bottom lines continue to grow as well. Revenue grew to $408.5 million in the second quarter, up from $337.6 million in the same period a year ago. Profit grew to $32.4 million in the second quarter, up from last year’s $26.5 million.

As subscribers, sales and profit rise, so too does Netflix’s stock. Shares of Netflix have jumped more than 45% since the start of the year, and managed to sidestep the doldrums experienced by the markets in March.

Still, it’s no time for Netflix to rest on its laurels, lest it suffer the same fate as Blockbuster. That’s why CEO Hastings is quietly preparing for the death of DVDs themselves. Ultimately, consumers will one day dump the plastic discs in favor of movies delivered straight over the Internet, Hastings told The Wall Street Journal.

So Hastings, who is a self-proclaimed student of companies that stumble by failing to adapt to technology shifts, is quickly trying to shift Netflix’s business so that more videos are available online.

While Hastings is having success in getting Netflix instant video onto devices, the biggest challenge facing his company is convincing Hollywood executives to license their content. While 12,000 choices may seem like a lot, many are older AAA movies or TV shows, or newer movies that weren’t commercially successful. New releases of hit movies usually take months or even years to appear in Netflix’s streaming video catalog.

That’s because Netflix is competing with pay cable channels such as Time Warner Inc.’s (NYSE: TWX) HBO and Viacom Inc.’s (NYSE: VIA) Showtime, which gain exclusive rights to show movies and generally have larger audiences. To get the movies and TV shows consumers want, Netflix will have to boost its licensing spending from the roughly $100 million it spent last year, an anonymous source told The Journal.

“Netflix has yet to show that it has the resources and profitability to be in the markets where licensing is the business policy,” said Warren Lieberfarb, former head of Time Warner’s Warner Bros. home video division.

The company has had some success in the licensing department earlier this year when it inked a deal with Liberty Media Corp. (Nasdaq: LMDIA) to show movies from its Starz pay cable channel.

Netflix’s library of 100,000-plus DVD titles is made possible by the “first-sale doctrine” of U.S. copyright law, which allows buyers of DVDs to lend them out without the consent of studios.

Too Little, Too Late?

It’s difficult to say when Blockbuster’s fall from grace began, but it was somewhere between its well-publicized late fee fiasco and the proliferation of Netflix.

Blockbuster’s operating income at the end of its second quarter in 2004 was $105.3 million. That was just before Netflix entered mainstream consumer consciousness. Blockbuster’s operating income at the end of its second quarter this year was a loss of $1.5 million.

In spite-of an 8.3% industry-wide increase in rental revenue, Blockbuster’s revenue fell 13.3%.

The company blamed the drop partly on reduced inventory as it tries to generate more cash to handle its debt load, the Los Angeles Timesreported.  Although Chief Executive Officer Jim Keyes told analysts in a conference call a renegotiation of a revolving line of credit meant stores would be fully stocked and more aggressively marketed, he admitted last week that didn’t happen.

“Temporarily during the first and second quarter, we put our plans for increased availability on hold,” Keyes said on the call. “We made this change with the recognition that we were also facing new and very aggressive competition who are better capitalized and would likely take share from us as we pulled back.”

Still, Blockbuster is doing everything it can to stay afloat, from closing stores to kiosk deployment.

“We’re deploying as many as 10,000 vending machines by the middle of next year,” Keyes told Bloomberg News in a telephone interview, adding that his company is focused on increasing cash flow rather than boosting sales in a “very challenging credit market.”

Blockbuster’s $250 million revolving line of credit is due on Sept. 30, 2010, and the company has more than $350 million of long-term debt outstanding that it must pay by the end of next year, according to a research note written by Wedbush Morgan Securities Inc. analyst Michael Pachter. Blockbuster had $99 million in cash and equivalents as of July 5, down 36% from $154.9 million on January 4, Pachter said.

“[Blockbuster needs] the credit markets to loosen up and they need to refinance,” Pachter told Bloomberg. “They’re not on track to repay this debt in the time frame they need to, so they’ve got to extend the terms.”

Pachter downgraded his rating on Blockbuster stock from “outperform” to “hold” last week. Blockbuster shares have tumbled more than 44% since the start of the year.

The Little Red Box That Could

Blockbuster was effectively rendered obsolete by Netflix’s quick response to changing technology. But Coinstar Inc.’s (Nasdaq: CSTR) Redbox Automated Retail LLC, which offers consumers new release DVDs for $1 per night, is hoping to avoid a similar fate.

Kiosk vendor Redbox, initially funded by McDonald’s Corp. (NYSE: MCD) and Coinstar in 2002, saw Coinstar acquire its remaining shares in February. The company’s $1-a-night DVD rentals are found in places like McDonalds restaurants, grocery stores, and numerous locations owned by retail giant Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) that that serve at least 15,000 customers a week.

Redbox plans on having 21,000 to 22,000 kiosks throughout the United States by January, up from 13,700 a year earlier. The company’s sales, which were $188.9 million in the second quarter, account for 57% of Coinstar’s overall sales, up from 41% in the same quarter last year. Coinstar’s stock has risen more than 62% since the beginning of the year.

At a time when consumers are strapped, Redbox is perfectly positioned for those looking to save money. But now Hollywood is looking to stunt Redbox’s growth.

Tinseltown accuses Redbox of depressing DVD prices and depriving studios of the same revenue-sharing opportunities they now enjoy with traditional DVD rental houses such as Blockbuster, Reuters reported.

Three studios – News Corp.’s (Nasdaq: NWS) 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, Warner Bros. and General Electric Co.’s (NYSE: GE) NBC Universal – are vowing to withhold their DVD distribution to kiosks like Redbox until 28 days after they are released.

To counter, Redbox has filed a lawsuit against at least one of the studios, 20th Century Fox.

“At the expense of consumers, 20th Century Fox is attempting to prohibit timely consumer access to its new release DVDs at Redbox retail locations nationwide,” said President Mitch Lowe. “Despite this attempt, Redbox will continue to provide our consumers access to all major new releases including 20th Century Fox titles at our more than 15,000Redbox DVD rental locations.”

Speaking to the LA Times, Lowe said Redbox isn’t a threat to Hollywood, but instead an additional source of income. However, Papi Capital analyst Richard Greenfield disagrees, writing that Redbox’s pricing is a “substantial risk” to the movie industry.

“It sets an ultra-low price point for movie content that will impact consumers’ decision-making process about all forms of movie-related commerce – theater-going, DVD purchase, video-on-demand,” Greenfield wrote.

Of course, distribution withholding and lawsuits aside, if Netflix’s Hastings is right and DVDs do walk the path of oblivion like CDs are now, Redbox will need to adapt and find a way to enter the already-crowded Internet video market.

Source: Hot Stocks: Netflix Finds Success in Innovation, While Other Video Rental Companies Fight For Survival ]]> http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/hot-stocks-netflix-finds-success-in-innovation-while-other-video-rental-companies-fight-for-survival/19974/feed 1 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/will-this-week%e2%80%99s-earnings-reports-reflect-a-recovery-or-a-relapse-for-the-us-economy/19961 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/will-this-week%e2%80%99s-earnings-reports-reflect-a-recovery-or-a-relapse-for-the-us-economy/19961#comments Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:00:21 +0000 Jason Simpkins http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19961 Several key second-quarter earnings reports could either validate or undercut assertions that the U.S. economy is poised for recovery.

After the Commerce Department reported last week that retail sales fell 0.1% in July from June, and 8.3% year-over-year, retailers will stay in the limelight this week as several high-profile companies report second-quarter earnings. Target Corp. (NYSE: TGT), Limited Brands Inc. (NYSE: LTD), and Gap Stores (NYSE: GPS) are among the big-name retailers set to report.

Meanwhile, the Hewlett-Packard Co’s (NYSE: HPQ) report will provide a further glimpse into the world of technology, and The Home Depot Co.’s (NYSE: HD) results will confirm or counter claims that the recent housing rebound is for real.  On that note, the upcoming economic releases include July housing starts and…

A few more scary details:

• The budget deficit is still on track to exceed $1.8 trillion by October, the end of the fiscal year. That would be four times last year’s record budget
• July spending rose to over $332.2 billion, an all-time high
• Government revenues fell 5.6% from last June, to $151 billion
• Those revenues have been lower than the same month the year before for 15 straight months.

And we doubt Uncle Sam will get much help from tax revenues anytime soon… even “cash for clunkers” couldn’t save American retail sales in July. The Commerce Department’s July retail sales number shocked the Street this morning, down 0.1%, despite expectations of a 0.8% rise.

The government’s cleverly acronymed Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS) program did help — without auto sales, the retail gauge would have fallen 0.6%. But the lowly consumer has made his point: Even with free money deals from Uncle Sam, retail is not ready to “get back on track,” as the Obama administration likes to say. In fact, even if the Street’s wish came true, we’d still be a long way from the old status quo.

In a similar vein, Wal-Mart’s latest sales numbers missed expectations this morning. While still profitable, the world’s biggest retailer saw same-store sales fall 1.2% in the second quarter — well below the Street’s forecast of a 1% rise.

Interestingly, Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) enjoyed 13 straight months of better same-store sales from April 2008-April 2009. Then they suddenly stopped reporting monthly sales and switched to quarterly. Now, in their first quarterly report, sales are down. Hmm… must be a coincidence.

Source: Record Budget Insanity

Good day… And a Terrific Tuesday to you! First day back yesterday was a killer for yours truly… Went home, and went to sleep… But, I’m back today, and feeling good. I did something to my left knee on vacation that left me hobbling, and leaning on my cane more than I usually do. But today, it seems a bit better, so I’ve got that going for me!

Yesterday, I left you with the euro popping back and forth over the 1.43 level… But in a wink of an eye, the 1.43 level was gone, and the euro was trading with a 1.44 level, and remained there the rest of the day, reaching 1.4420 for the high… As I turn on the screens this morning, I see that the single unit has gone to popping back and forth over the 1.44 level… You don’t think it will get another sling-shot higher today do you?

I don’t… I was actually shocked to see that move yesterday… But then, I did say that the bias to sell dollars had really picked up steam lately. The piece of data that really pushed the dollar lower yesterday, was actually a “good piece of data” for the U.S. economy… The ISM Index (manufacturing) came in higher than expected and has reached a pre-Lehman Bros collapse level of 48.9… This was a BIG move from the previous month’s 44.8… It’s still below the “line in the sand figure” of 50, which is the indicator of contraction or expansion… I would say given the move from 44.8 to near 49, that expansion is already happening…

And why would that be given the rot on the U.S. economy’s vine? Ahhh grasshopper… Here’s a key ingredient, that I’ve pointed out to you for years now… The dollar… The dollar, measured by the dollar index has lost 13.4%… The dollar index, in case your new to class or have forgotten a previous lesson, is a basket of U.S. trading partner’s currencies. It is heavily weighted toward euros though… And therefore you have one of the reasons I always talk about the euro being the Big Dog… That, and the fact that the euro is the second most liquid trading currency in the world, and… It’s the offset currency to the dollar!

And… So… Here’s a note to the dollar bulls… Mess with this, and you’ll see manufacturing go right back into the dumpster!

But, what about this ISM Index? Pretty strong, I would say, given all that’s going on in not only the U.S. but the world. Going back to yesterday’s discussion about the recession coming to an end. This is one of the key pieces of data that will indicate to me that we have hit bottom and the bounce is on… I know that I have been pretty cynical of the forecasters that were calling for the bounce 6 months ago and so on, but if we get more of this type of data in the coming weeks, I’ll have to put a different cap on…

OK… The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) met last night, and as expected they left their internal interest rates unchanged. The RBA did move their bias for interest rates from easing to neutral, which is a natural progression to the next step of beginning a rate hike cycle. The RBA wasn’t in the mood to go “all in” on the move to neutral though… They hedged their move by saying that, “the present accommodative setting of monetary policy is appropriate given the economy’s circumstances.” That’s Central Bank parlance for “we’re doing this now, but we’re prepared to go back to easing should the economy’s rebound falter”…

So, the A$ was not able to push higher, as would normally be expected if the Central Bank would have gone “all in” on the move higher in bias… The A$ is hovering around 84-cents these days, which isn’t shabby considering that on March 1st of this year it was trading with a 63-cent handle! Still not the “go-go” days of summer 2008, when the A$ was knocking at the door of parity to the green/peachback.

The A$’s rise from the ashes of Feb 2008 is dragging kiwi along. The New Zealand dollar / kiwi saw the same kind of bloodletting the A$ did last fall, so any dragging higher is a welcome sight to kiwi holders. I’m still not sold on kiwi’s ability to maintain the levels it reached last year, given their deficit position… For those of you new to class, the kiwi was able to rise in the fact of a HUGE deficit, because of their interest rate differential to the rest of the world. New Zealand had the highest interest rates in the industrialized world, and those interest rates kept the blinders on their deficit… But, I kept warning folks that once the rates began to drop the Deficit would be as obvious as a man with a hatchet in his forehead!

So… The any dragging is good news to the kiwi holders…

OK… Back in the U.S., the Treasury announced that they would need to borrow less than originally forecast in the 3rd QTR by $109 Billion… They’ll still need to borrow over $400 Billion, and will keep the pace of the total borrowings through the end of the fiscal year (September) at $1.39 Trillion…

The Treasury is borrowing less, because a handful of Big Banks are repaying their TARP loans… That’s a good thing, I guess… But I just can’t get a warm and fuzzy about the stories I keep reading regarding this whole deal of loaning money and buying back their bad assets so they can repay the loans to the Treasury… It’s all mish-mashed folks… But! I’m not going there! I’m keeping my nose to the task at hand, and not veering off course…

The thing to take from this is that the Treasury will still need to borrow $1.39 Trillion in the past year, with the borrowings gaining momentum in the past 6 months… And this total amount of borrowings is what’s weighing on the appetite for Treasuries by foreigners…

Did you see where Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) just issued $1 Billion in bonds but denominated them in yen? Is there a message there? I believe there is a message there, folks… Now, if we begin to see more Corporations doing this, then the message will be loud and clear. These Corporations don’t believe they can sell their debt denominated in dollars, as the world is choking on dollars right now… When and if other Corporations begin to do this, we’ll see the dollar get sold like ponchos on a rainy day at Disney World!

OK… Let’s not go down that road of gloom and doom… Instead let’s talk about a currency that’s moved higher while remaining in stealth mode… The Canadian dollar / loonie… Ever since the Bank of Canada’s Gov. said earlier this month that he was going to do whatever he needed to do to keep the loonie weak… The loonie has taken off on a moons hot! In fact, the loonie just hit a 10-month high VS the green/peachback!

And, not meaning to place the Chuck’s kiss of death on these currencies, but this scene has played out in other places too… In Canada, Switzerland, and Brazil, each respective country’s Central Bank Gov. issued warnings about keeping their currency weak… In all three, the exact opposite has happened. And I have to smile about that, because… You may recall me calling out today’s currency traders as not having the cojones to take on Central Banks, as opposed to the currency traders of yesteryear who would take it as a personal challenge to defeat a Central Banker that put down a line in the sand on a currency’s level…

So… It may all be a coinquidink, that these three currencies are rallying after their Central Bank Governors said they would keep their respective currencies weak… But I doubt it!

I see that Gold and Silver are back on the rally tracks again… Gold is trading over $950 again… And the price of Oil has jumped too ($70.67)… Commodities are all on the rise, once again as risk appetite really begins to grow. The Chinese have ignited the fire on Commodities with their economic growth and demand for the raw materials, and with that thought, commodity traders are jumping on the bandwagon…

I suspect we’ll see some profit taking today in the currencies and commodities though… But that’s OK! Bring them back a bit, give everyone that was sitting on the sidelines waiting for an opportunity to buy, a chance to do so, and then move on to higher ground! That sounds like a plan! And you know what I like to say… I love it when a plan comes together!

Currencies today 8/4/09: A$ .8395, kiwi .6665, C$ .9365, euro 1.4390, sterling 1.6935, Swiss .9410, rand 7.8325, krone 6.0475, SEK 7.1625, forint 185.70, zloty 2.86, koruna 17.95, yen 94.60, sing 1.4330, HKD 7.75, INR 47.71, China 6.8296, pesos 13.13, BRL 1.8250, dollar index 77.66, Oil $70.67, 10-year 3.62%, Silver $14.12, and Gold… $953.50

That’s it for today… I hope you have a Terrific Tuesday!

Chuck Butler

Source: U.S. Manufacturing Is Recovering…

The thought that jumps to mind is that solar power isn’t going to be “alternative energy” for much longer.

In spite of the current economic malaise and market downturn we’re navigating through, solar energy is one of the few bright spots (pun intended) in the alternative energy space.

The reason?

• Continued advances in solar panel technology are resulting in cheaper, more efficient panels.
• Government subsidies at both the state and federal levels are making the installation of residential solar more compelling than ever.

Here’s why solar is looking brighter by the day, and a major retailer that could change everything.

The Solar Energy Industry’s Solar Cell Production

For the past few years, the solar power industry has been capacity constrained by the lack of polysilicon, the basic foundation on which chemicals are deposited to produce the solar cells used in panels.

But as in other areas of the semiconductor industry, technology marches on. The newest panels are based on thin-film technology, and don’t require polysilicon. No fewer than 143 companies are involved in some aspect of thin-film panel technology.

Thin-film is fast becoming the new standard in panel technology, and in a few years will render polysilicon panels obsolete. Right now, thin-film panels are averaging about $1.40 per watt, but that number will be halved in a year or two.

That alone will make thin-film panels competitive with their polysilicon predecessors, but panel efficiencies – currently around 9% – are rising, and will likely reach 18-20% in the next few years.

Combined, decreasing costs and increasing efficiencies will soon make solar panels the cheapest power source on the planet.

Like everything else, economics will ultimately drive the solar panel industry, just like it has in the computer industry. And one of the greatest modern companies to exploit economics of scale is getting into the act.

Wal-Mart’s Solar Energy Experiment

Wal-Mart Stores (NYSE: WMT) is already evaluating the feasibility of installing solar energy panels on the roofs of its stores. Consider it “dipping a toe” in the water to check its temperature.

• If an experiment involving a few stores pans out, Walmart could decide to roll out panels to all of its stores. That’s about 35 square miles of surface area.
• Using a very conservative figure of around 3 watts per square foot, Walmart could realistically expect to produce in the neighborhood of 3 Gigawatts of power.
• That would make the low-cost retailer one of the largest power producers in the country.

Now replicate that scenario on every warehouse, and big box store in the country, and you begin to get the idea that solar energy could reasonably provide a significant percentage of the power we use, especially during peak usage times.

Storage when the sun isn’t shining is certainly an issue, but scientists and engineers are already designing load-shifting storage systems that will provide power during times of darkness or on cloudy days.

The entire sector recently got a boost when SunPower Corporation (Nasdaq: SPRWA) announced earnings and blew away analysts estimates.

If Wal-Mart does forcefully enter the solar space, we’re going to see it use its tremendous pricing power to lower the cost of solar energy and gain mass production. The kinds of things only a company of that size and negotiating power can do.

And when that happens, consumers everywhere will be jumping aboard.

Investors who want exposure to the sector should view market pullbacks as opportunities to establish small positions in their favorite solar stocks.

Good investing,

Dave Fessler

Source: A Bright Spot in the Alternative Energy Sector

But don’t expect that to last. A slump in consumer spending and soaring unemployment could both pose a significant threat to retailers going into the 2009 holiday season.

The U.S. unemployment rate hit 9.5% in June and could eclipse 10% by the end of the year, sending the economy into a “jobless recovery.”

In a speech to Congress on May 9, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke cited a lack of consumer spending could serve as a constraint on hiring. This could create a paradoxical effect as employment obviously plays a key role in consumers’ spending habits.

Even for the employed, the lessons learned from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression will resonate with consumers. That has already been evidenced by the U.S. savings rate, which has climbed above 4% for the first time in more than a decade.

In addition to taking money out of the hands of potential customers, soaring unemployment could lead to higher lending standards. As unemployment rises, so too will credit defaults and the cost of credit will increase accordingly.

In the past, consumers have counted on attractive financing promotions for the purchase of big-ticket items such as high-definition televisions and kitchen appliances. But that won’t be the case with tighter credit

“Consumers were also able to spend more because of the easy availability of credit, most notably through mortgage equity withdrawal and they responded by buying more items,” said Deloitte Strategic Advisor Richard Hyman.  “These conditions underpinned retail growth for the past 10 years but have now disappeared. However, it’s worse than that. They will clearly not return once the recession is over.”

Of course, tighter credit isn’t just a problem for consumers.

A Brick & Mortar Inventory Crunch for the Holidays?

The potential bankruptcy of commercial lender CIT Group Inc. (NYSE:CIT) could be a major tipping point for businesses that rely heavily on credit. Vendors for retail giants such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE:WMT) and Target Corp. (NYSE: TGT) rely on CIT for factoring – an old form of finance in which the lender pays the vendor for its accounts receivable. If the retailer fails to pay for the goods, the lender assumes the responsibility to pay the vendor.

“Right now our industry is preparing for the fall and winter season,” Kevin M. Burke, president and chief executive of the American Apparel and Footwear Association told The New York Times. “A lot of these orders are going to come to a grinding halt if there is no capital.”
A CIT bankruptcy would be a “double whammy” to stores whose suppliers have already cut the amount of merchandise they are making to better align inventory with the drop in consumer spending, said Burke. If those suppliers lose their sole source of capital, what little merchandise retailers originally ordered might never arrive.
The timing of CIT’s woes is “terrible,” Al Ferrara, a partner in retail and consumer products business of consulting firm BDO Seidman LLC said in a Reuters interview. “Retailers now are basically gearing up for the back-to-school and the fall season.”
An inventory crunch at brick & mortar retailers would give a competitive advantage to online retailers, which have more flexibility and already account for about a third of holiday retail sales.

For brick & mortar retail businesses, managing inventories during the holiday season is a delicate balancing act in which managers must walk a fine line between over- and under-ordering stock.

If retailers overstock, they will be forced to offer even steeper post-holiday discounts than they would like in a desperate bid to unload inventory. But if they don’t stock enough merchandise to meet demand they risk not only missing out on sales, but driving potential customers to online retailers, such as Amazon.com Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN) whose warehouses are not restricted by the display racks and checkout counters found in brick & mortar stores.

This doesn’t mean brick & mortar retailers will sit idly by this holiday season as Amazon siphons off customers via the Internet. All of the nation’s biggest retail players have their own websites too, but the gap between Amazon and the No. 2 online retailer, Staples Inc. (Nasdaq:SPLS) is huge: Amazon generated $19.2 billion in online revenue in 2008, while Staples generated less than half of that in the same year: $7.7 billion.

While half of the top 10 online revenue generators came from traditional stores, notably absent were brick & mortar discount giants Wal-Mart and Target.

And even Best Buy Co. Inc. (NYSE: BBY), which displays in-store signage promoting an “expanded assortment” of products online for consumers who did not find what they were looking for in the store, came in at just No. 10 on the list.

Shopping for a Silver Lining

While a continued slump in consumer spending would benefit no one, certain retailers are better positioned than others, and could ultimately use adverse economic conditions to turn a profit.

For instance, the aforementioned Amazon.com, which is the world’s largest online retailer, could see a sizeable boost in its web traffic as consumers comb the Internet for bargains.

Companies that have a consumer-friendly economical brand, such as Wal-Mart, will also benefit.

Wal-Mart’s “Save Money, Live Better” slogan is already resonating with consumers, and The No. 1 retailer in the world has gone to great lengths to cement its reputation as the affordable choice for shoppers.

The company has set up a “Save Money, Live Better” website (complete with testimonials of what people are doing with the money they save by shopping at Wal-Mart) and a “Live Better Index,” which includes an interactive map of the United States to show how much money people have saved in each state by shopping at Wal-Mart.

The result of Wal-Mart’s efforts? Holiday sales grew 7% last year, according to the Advertising Research Foundation.

Similarly, same-store sales are consistently rising at discount houses such as Family Dollar Stores Inc. (NYSE: FDO), and Ross Stores Inc. (Nasdaq: ROST), the latter of which has the “Dress for Less” sloganright under its name at every store. On the flip side, stores like Macy’s Inc. (NYSE: M) and Saks Inc. (NYSE: SKS) have reported consistent declines in same-store sales over the past few quarters.

“Needs-driven spending will gravitate towards retailers able to tick the most important consumer boxes like price and convenience,” said Deloitte’s Hyman. “Although it will remain the engine of retail growth, wants-driven spending will slow and consumers will be much more choosy.”

Source: Retail Sector Faces Uphill Climb in 2009

Here’s one hot off the press:

Oh my, where do we begin? This beast calls for bullet points:

• Obviously, Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) is no longer No. 1. That title now goes to Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE:RDS.A). The American consumer is out, and a global oil conglomerate is in… ’nuff said
• There’s a clear sea change in American business. AIG, Lehman and Bear Stearns fell off the list from 2008-2009. Nike (NYSE:NKE), Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) moved up
• The world is increasingly less Amero-centric. An American company is not No. 1 for the first time in over a decade. In the whole list for 2009, 140 companies are American, the lowest number on record
• The world is increasingly more Sino-centric. Look at China National Petroleum and Sinopec (NYSE:SHI). Both Chinese companies are by far the biggest movers up from 2008-2009. Sinopec, an oil and gas company, also marks China’s first foray into Fortunes’ top 10. China now has 37 companies in the list of 500, its largest presence ever
• Oil is still where it’s at. In spite of all the price drama over the last year, seven of the top 10 firms are oil companies
• In the face of the worst global economic environment of our lifetimes, the world’s biggest companies are still making lots of money. The 2008 top 25 pulled in $4.88 trillion in revenue. This year, they made $5.38 trillion
• And freakin’ GE… what a black box. The world’s producer of everything was one of very few companies to retain the same position from 2008-2009. And despite the infamous GE Capital, the finance arm that apparently threatened to torpedo the whole company, GE ended up increasing revenues by nearly $7 billion. Hmmm…

Source: The Great Shift of 2009