<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; XLF XT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/xlf-xt/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bank Failures Could Mean 79% Gains on XLF December 20 Puts</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/more-bank-failures-could-mean-79-gains-on-xlf-december-20-puts/4986</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/more-bank-failures-could-mean-79-gains-on-xlf-december-20-puts/4986#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Lass</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fdic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US banking crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XLF XT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/more-bank-failures-could-mean-79-gains-on-xlf-december-20-puts/4986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week, FDIC chair <strong>Sheila Blair</strong> said the insurance fund might have to borrow to cover the nation&#8217;s <strong>bank failures</strong>.</p>
<p>The FDIC&#8217;s $53 billion simply isn&#8217;t enough to cover the assets held by the growing number of “problem” banks. The FDIC&#8217;s list has increased from 90 at the end of March to 117 in June. Total assets affected now stand at $78 billion.</p>
<p>If even a portion of the these banks go under, says <strong>Adam Lass</strong> in <a href="http://www.taipanpublishing.com"  class="alinks_links">Taipan</a> Daily, the <strong>XLF December 20 puts</strong>   (XLF XT), which track the S&#38;P 500&#8217;s Financial Select Sector, could gain of some 52%. A big number of failures could send these options up 79%&#8230; </p>
<p>This from Adam&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Aren’t you even a little curious? I know I am.I am speaking of the&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, FDIC chair <strong>Sheila Blair</strong> said the insurance fund might have to borrow to cover the nation&#8217;s <strong>bank failures</strong>.</p>
<p>The FDIC&#8217;s $53 billion simply isn&#8217;t enough to cover the assets held by the growing number of “problem” banks. The FDIC&#8217;s list has increased from 90 at the end of March to 117 in June. Total assets affected now stand at $78 billion.</p>
<p>If even a portion of the these banks go under, says <strong>Adam Lass</strong> in <a href="http://www.taipanpublishing.com"  class="alinks_links">Taipan</a> Daily, the <strong>XLF December 20 puts</strong>   (XLF XT), which track the S&amp;P 500&#8217;s Financial Select Sector, could gain of some 52%. A big number of failures could send these options up 79%&#8230; </p>
<p>This from Adam&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Aren’t you even a little curious? I know I am.I am speaking of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s  list of 117 “problem banks.” According to its latest press release, the number  of banks that may have squandered away their depositors’ cash is up 30%,  quarter over quarter, the highest it’s been in more than five years.</p>
<p>What’s more, the FDIC anticipates that this list will surely  grow over the next few months or maybe even weeks, as profits are down some 87%  compared to the same quarter last year. Back then, the guys who should know  more about money than anyone besides the folks who print it made some $36.8  billion.</p>
<p>Now they are down to less than $5 billion in profits. And  even that paltry gain is hardly secure, for, as we have seen lately, a single  American bank can lose $5 billion in the blink of an eye.</p>
<p>How did they make so much money then, and how have they  arrived at such dire straits? As most folks know by now, bankers are suffering  from the pains of their own excess. Some 20% of the loans they made to anybody  who could tie their own shoes are now overdue 90 days or more.</p>
<p>A curious soul might be tempted to wander by the FDIC’s Web site  to determine whether or not their very own bank is teetering on the brink.  Unfortunately, they would be stymied in this effort.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<table style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px" width="590" align="center" border="1" bordercolor="#debe7c" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td width="574" bgcolor="#f2ead7"><strong>Big Oil is set to  make &#8220;Reimbursement Payments&#8221; that could help fund your retirement.</strong>Thanks to the help of this unique situation, you could  make 50% in less than a month&#8230; and 400% by the end of this year. And you  could <a href="http://www.isecureonline.com/reports/CUT/WCUTJ818/" target="_blank">begin receiving your payouts as early as tomorrow.</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>You see, the very last thing the FDIC wants you to know is  which bank might go under next. If you knew that, you and a couple of million  of your friends and neighbors might be tempted to ask for your cash now. And  that would get ugly indeed.</p>
<p>You could easily find out the names of the nine banks that have  already done so in 2008, compared to three the year before and none for two  years prior to that.</p>
<p>You might, if you searched long enough, find the buried memo  the FDIC has sent off to the Treasury Department, complaining that its funds  are now so depleted that it would be unable to cover this expected wave of  failure with out delving deeply into the public till.</p>
<p>Yes, that’s right: The semi-independent insurance  corporation whose sole job is to bail out banks is in need of a public bailout  itself. In fact, it is right in line behind those other semi-private giants,  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.</p>
<p>Wait &#8212; wasn’t their job to assure the public of our  economic stability, too? None of this sounds too terribly stable to me. I am  not assured one bit.</p>
<p>I am told that in a good year, some 13% of the banks that  appear on the FDIC’s list go under. That means that some 15 more banks are  virtually guaranteed to go bankrupt in the near future. Even if the Feds do  manage to gin up enough cash to cover depositors (and how they will manage that  feat is a worrisome thought worthy of an entirely separate column), a fair number  of investors will get screwed out of every penny.</p>
<p>These are not wild-eyed speculators plunking down play money  on pie-in-the-sky tech dreams. These are not shifty Florida real estate  flippers. The sober upstanding folks who bought into these banks and into the  mammoth Washington outfits that insured them are retirees, orphans and widows  who were told that these investments were veritable “Rocks of Gibraltar.”</p>
<p>Unbeatable, and indeed untouchable. Sound as an American  dollar. Good as gold.</p>
<p>So I am more than a little curious. And perhaps a little  angry.</p>
<p>In fact, I am in the mood for a little revenge.</p>
<p>And since living well is always the best revenge, I propose  the following: When the next wave of defaults hits the newswires, the <strong>S&amp;P Financial SPDR (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=xlf" target="_blank">XLF</a>:AMEX)</strong> &#8212;  the ETF that bundles together the biggest players like <strong>Bank of America (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">BAC</a>:NYSE)</strong>, <strong>Citigroup  (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AC&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">C</a>:NYSE) </strong>and <strong>Wells Fargo (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWFC" target="_blank">WFC</a>:NYSE)</strong> with regional outfits like <strong>Wachovia  (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWB" target="_blank">WB</a>:NYSE)</strong>, <strong>SunTrust (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASTI&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">STI</a>:NYSE)</strong> and <strong>Fifth Third Bancorp (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AFITB&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">FITB</a>:NASDAQ)</strong> &#8212; ought to fall at least two or three bucks.</p>
<p>A drop from current levels ($20.37 as I sit to write) to,  say, $18 would push the <strong>XLF December 20 puts  (XLF XT)</strong> from $179 to $272 per contract, for a gain of some 52%.</p>
<p>A real rout, you know, the sort that brings on bank  holidays, would drop the XLF below its August low of $16.77, rounding your put  gains over 79%.</p>
<p>Ah, sweet revenge!</p>
<p>Sincerely yours,</p>
<p>Adam Lass</p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com/Taipan-Daily-082808.html" title="Open a new browser window to learn more." target="_blank">15 American Banks Are About to Go Under… and the FDIC May Not Have the Cash to Cover Them! </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/more-bank-failures-could-mean-79-gains-on-xlf-december-20-puts/4986/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.745 seconds -->
