<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Truth About UBS vs. IRS that You Won’t Find in the Newspaper Headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-truth-about-ubs-vs-irs-that-you-won%e2%80%99t-find-in-the-newspaper-headlines/20071/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-truth-about-ubs-vs-irs-that-you-won%e2%80%99t-find-in-the-newspaper-headlines/20071</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 05:09:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-truth-about-ubs-vs-irs-that-you-won%e2%80%99t-find-in-the-newspaper-headlines/20071/comment-page-1#comment-118186</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Blanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20071#comment-118186</guid>
		<description>Bob:  It was a pleasure to meet you at the Cancun Roundtable a time back.  I want to open an offshore account.  I live in Los Angeles, California.  I was and still am a Legal Secretary and have started being an intermediary on various commodoties.  I have not closed one yet but I am working on it.  I would like your recommendation on which offshore jurisdiction you would recommend right now.  As a US citizen I get that I have to disclose that I have an offshore account and I have to pay taxes on my income worldwide.  Perhaps a swiss account would be okay.  I would like to have an account with a low entry in place so I could be ready when I close a deal.  Is there anywhere where I can open an account for say $1000?  I could switch to a fancier account later on when the money comes in.  I just want to be offshore just in case of any litigation bs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob:  It was a pleasure to meet you at the Cancun Roundtable a time back.  I want to open an offshore account.  I live in Los Angeles, California.  I was and still am a Legal Secretary and have started being an intermediary on various commodoties.  I have not closed one yet but I am working on it.  I would like your recommendation on which offshore jurisdiction you would recommend right now.  As a US citizen I get that I have to disclose that I have an offshore account and I have to pay taxes on my income worldwide.  Perhaps a swiss account would be okay.  I would like to have an account with a low entry in place so I could be ready when I close a deal.  Is there anywhere where I can open an account for say $1000?  I could switch to a fancier account later on when the money comes in.  I just want to be offshore just in case of any litigation bs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariamante</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-truth-about-ubs-vs-irs-that-you-won%e2%80%99t-find-in-the-newspaper-headlines/20071/comment-page-1#comment-87447</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariamante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20071#comment-87447</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t the government go after Fat Cats like George Soros (Quantum Funds) who manage Unregulated Hedge funds in the Cayman Islands? 

They are aiding facilitating tax evasion, and money laundering for the drug cartels. If we really want to get help this country, we&#039;ve got to get rid of the crooked Influence Peddlers, who have corrupted our political system and society.

The Hidden Soros Agenda: Drugs, Money, the Media, and Political Power

SPECIAL REPORT  &#124;  BY CLIFF KINCAID  &#124;  OCTOBER 27, 2004 
http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-hidden-soros-agenda-drugs-money-the-media-and-political-power/

Now 200 hundred days into the Obama administration, and 16 years after Soros began his advocacy for drug legalization and promoting &quot;medical marijuana,&quot; the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is venturing into the marijuana cigarettes production and distribution. According to the Aug. 5 solicitation for proposals, the selected organizations will be controlled by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and will have to comply with FDA regulations. 

http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/13/george-soros-marijuana-legalization-opinions-contributors-rachel-ehrenfeld.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t the government go after Fat Cats like George Soros (Quantum Funds) who manage Unregulated Hedge funds in the Cayman Islands? </p>
<p>They are aiding facilitating tax evasion, and money laundering for the drug cartels. If we really want to get help this country, we&#8217;ve got to get rid of the crooked Influence Peddlers, who have corrupted our political system and society.</p>
<p>The Hidden Soros Agenda: Drugs, Money, the Media, and Political Power</p>
<p>SPECIAL REPORT  |  BY CLIFF KINCAID  |  OCTOBER 27, 2004<br />
<a href="http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-hidden-soros-agenda-drugs-money-the-media-and-political-power/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-hidden-soros-agenda-drugs-money-the-media-and-political-power/</a></p>
<p>Now 200 hundred days into the Obama administration, and 16 years after Soros began his advocacy for drug legalization and promoting &#8220;medical marijuana,&#8221; the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is venturing into the marijuana cigarettes production and distribution. According to the Aug. 5 solicitation for proposals, the selected organizations will be controlled by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and will have to comply with FDA regulations. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/13/george-soros-marijuana-legalization-opinions-contributors-rachel-ehrenfeld.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/13/george-soros-marijuana-legalization-opinions-contributors-rachel-ehrenfeld.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-truth-about-ubs-vs-irs-that-you-won%e2%80%99t-find-in-the-newspaper-headlines/20071/comment-page-1#comment-74470</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20071#comment-74470</guid>
		<description>Interesting...

&quot;4) use blatant economic blackmail against not only an errant bank, but against a friendly country that has long been a faithful ally and against its 7.6 million people.&quot;

But the above statement should be dropped, depending on the definition of &quot;has long been faithful&quot;. The Swiss Banking Industry&#039;s primary drive is profits at any cost, including claiming neutrality during WWII while supporting, covertly and primarily, the Nazis (including turning over American Servicemen to the SS escaping to Switzerland) who were filling their coffers with stolen assets from everywhere they conquered and then hiding those assets within the system through bureaucratic mazes for as long as humanly possible.

They have long been faithful to money and profits, period, and until we were the largest supplier of both, they couldn&#039;t care less about us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;4) use blatant economic blackmail against not only an errant bank, but against a friendly country that has long been a faithful ally and against its 7.6 million people.&#8221;</p>
<p>But the above statement should be dropped, depending on the definition of &#8220;has long been faithful&#8221;. The Swiss Banking Industry&#8217;s primary drive is profits at any cost, including claiming neutrality during WWII while supporting, covertly and primarily, the Nazis (including turning over American Servicemen to the SS escaping to Switzerland) who were filling their coffers with stolen assets from everywhere they conquered and then hiding those assets within the system through bureaucratic mazes for as long as humanly possible.</p>
<p>They have long been faithful to money and profits, period, and until we were the largest supplier of both, they couldn&#8217;t care less about us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-truth-about-ubs-vs-irs-that-you-won%e2%80%99t-find-in-the-newspaper-headlines/20071/comment-page-1#comment-72669</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20071#comment-72669</guid>
		<description>Re: The Truth About UBS vs. IRS that You Won’t Find in the Newspaper Headlines 

IRC- The law is special law not positive law. According to one Cynthia J. Mills disclosure officer Dept of Treas. IRS, incomes not effectively connected to a trade or business within the US government are not subject to any tax under subtitle A of the IRC. 

See        http://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX09.023.pdf

See        losthorizons.com    and read Pete Hendricksons book &quot;Cracking the Code: The facinating truth about taxation in America&quot;

See       http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00006049----000-.html

Be sure to substitute the definition of the term person (provided in 6049 d)  for the term person everywhere it is used in this section. Apply the principle of law construction supplied in Blacks law dictionary 6th edition: inclusio unius est exclusio alteras (inclusion of one is the absolute exlusion of all others). There is no mention of private sector in section 6049. Therefore private sector interest/dividend payments made that are not connected with government or international units etc are not required to be reported as taxable. 1099int returns are prima facie evidence, therefore, they are rebuttable (as are w-2s and 1099 misc). See definitions of the term &quot;employee&quot; and the term &quot;trade or business&quot; supplied in the IRC. Sections 3401(c) and 7701(a)26 respectively. Be sure to apply Blacks law contruction principle. 

Is the reason this information is not disclosed to the American people because the misunderstood and mis- applied laws are providing a gravy train that has allowed government to grow to the size it is? Is this not lying through ommission? Let us commit to telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Every politician I have heard say that government is too big does nothing to shrink it.

The oath of office seems to be ignored by the polititions, except in cases like Ron Paul. He now has about 290 co-sponsors to audit the Federal Reserve. People are waking up because his predictions are coming true. Fewer people are laughing at him as they did in the primaries.

Look at the 9/12 project in DC. 2 million people? 

Seek the truth and follow it no matter where it leads. If not, decisions are made with deception as their foundation and we end up asking the question-&quot;What went wrong&quot;.  Is this not the situation America currently is in? 

As a US military veteran, I took the oath to defend and protect our constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. I have not denounced that oath. Do our polititions mean their oath of office or do they take it just to get their pictures in the paper? Is our government one of, for and by the people or of, for and by the institutions? 

Those that claim our constitution (which is a contract between the people and their government) is a living document, (including the first ten amendments), and are willing to shred it are shredding the very document that authorizes our government and governments limitations. Therefore, they are optting for anarchy. This would not be good for the American people or anyone else as history has demonstrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: The Truth About UBS vs. IRS that You Won’t Find in the Newspaper Headlines </p>
<p>IRC- The law is special law not positive law. According to one Cynthia J. Mills disclosure officer Dept of Treas. IRS, incomes not effectively connected to a trade or business within the US government are not subject to any tax under subtitle A of the IRC. </p>
<p>See        <a href="http://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX09.023.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://sedm.org/Exhibits/EX09.023.pdf</a></p>
<p>See        losthorizons.com    and read Pete Hendricksons book &#8220;Cracking the Code: The facinating truth about taxation in America&#8221;</p>
<p>See       <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00006049----000-.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00006049&#8212;-000-.html</a></p>
<p>Be sure to substitute the definition of the term person (provided in 6049 d)  for the term person everywhere it is used in this section. Apply the principle of law construction supplied in Blacks law dictionary 6th edition: inclusio unius est exclusio alteras (inclusion of one is the absolute exlusion of all others). There is no mention of private sector in section 6049. Therefore private sector interest/dividend payments made that are not connected with government or international units etc are not required to be reported as taxable. 1099int returns are prima facie evidence, therefore, they are rebuttable (as are w-2s and 1099 misc). See definitions of the term &#8220;employee&#8221; and the term &#8220;trade or business&#8221; supplied in the IRC. Sections 3401(c) and 7701(a)26 respectively. Be sure to apply Blacks law contruction principle. </p>
<p>Is the reason this information is not disclosed to the American people because the misunderstood and mis- applied laws are providing a gravy train that has allowed government to grow to the size it is? Is this not lying through ommission? Let us commit to telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.</p>
<p>Every politician I have heard say that government is too big does nothing to shrink it.</p>
<p>The oath of office seems to be ignored by the polititions, except in cases like Ron Paul. He now has about 290 co-sponsors to audit the Federal Reserve. People are waking up because his predictions are coming true. Fewer people are laughing at him as they did in the primaries.</p>
<p>Look at the 9/12 project in DC. 2 million people? </p>
<p>Seek the truth and follow it no matter where it leads. If not, decisions are made with deception as their foundation and we end up asking the question-&#8221;What went wrong&#8221;.  Is this not the situation America currently is in? </p>
<p>As a US military veteran, I took the oath to defend and protect our constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. I have not denounced that oath. Do our polititions mean their oath of office or do they take it just to get their pictures in the paper? Is our government one of, for and by the people or of, for and by the institutions? </p>
<p>Those that claim our constitution (which is a contract between the people and their government) is a living document, (including the first ten amendments), and are willing to shred it are shredding the very document that authorizes our government and governments limitations. Therefore, they are optting for anarchy. This would not be good for the American people or anyone else as history has demonstrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.198 seconds -->

