Thursday, November 20th, 2008

Why We Need Less Government Interference, Not More

Aug 5th, 2008 | By John Stepek | Category: International Investing

In the wake of the sub-prime crisis, there’s been a lot of nonsense talked about how the financial markets have proved unable to regulate themselves. Apparently intelligent people have been arguing that what we really need is greater government intervention in the markets.


In case these people hadn’t noticed, governments are already up to their necks in the markets, particularly the ones in the worst trouble. Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE)– the twin financial neutron bombs underpinning the US mortgage sector – are Government Sponsored Entities (GSE) after all. They were created by the US Government to interfere with the property market because at some point the authorities decided that universal home ownership – like full employment – was a desirable goal in itself, regardless of whether people could actually afford a home or not.

Now the very existence of the GSEs threatens to bring down the financial system (you can read more about Fannie and Freddie here: How Fannie and Freddie are pulling the US towards crisis).

These knee-jerk calls for added regulation just show that despite all the talk of Thatcherite revolutions and how we’re all capitalists now, plenty of people still don’t understand how or why markets work.

One very obvious example of this is the constant indulgence of the idea of a windfall tax on energy companies…

How the market system is supposed to work

My colleague David Stevenson wrote about the specific stupidities of a windfall tax on energy on Friday (you can read it here: Why an energy windfall tax is a bad idea). But on a broader note, calls for a windfall tax just show how badly understood markets are. Let’s just clarify roughly how they are supposed to work.

If a good or service becomes expensive, that shows that there’s not enough of it to go around – there’s more demand than supply. The companies involved in the sector then make “excess” profits, or to put it more clearly, they rake it in because they were smart or lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time.

But this happy situation won’t last forever. Just as in the recent housing bubble, everyone else sees them making money hand over fist and decides “I’ll have a piece of that.” Or the company itself realises if it can make and sell more goods, it’ll make even bigger profits. One way or another, supply rises to meet demand, therefore driving down the price.

Read the Full Article

Source: Why We Need Less Government Interference, Not More


AdvertisementNew 5-currency Index CD from EverBank©. Apply today.

The new Debt-Free Index CD is comprised of equal parts Singapore dollar, Japanese yen, Swiss franc, Australian dollar and Brazilian real. Why these currencies? All 5 economies have a strong balance of payments—a factor that could aid performance against the U.S. dollar.

Of the 5 economies, only Australia has a trade deficit—and the gap appears to be narrowing. Concerned about investing in a weak U.S. dollar? Consider this new Index CD, it is available in 3- and 6-month terms with a $20,000 minimum deposit. Apply today here

This CD is FDIC insured against bank insolvency, but please keep in mind that you could lose principal as a result of currency fluctuation.



More on this topic (What's this?)
Citi’s Leverage
Read more on Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae at Wikinvest
Tags: , , ,

By John Stepek

Related Articles



About the Author

John StepekJohn Stepek is Deputy Editor of the UK-based financial weekly MoneyWeek. He is also the editor of daily investment email Money Morning UK. John graduated from Strathclyde University in 1996. He has worked for a number of financial magazines and newsletters including Families in Business, Shares Magazine and The Sunday Times.

See All Posts by This Author

Money Week

Money Week gives you intelligent and enjoyable commentary on the most important financial stories of the week, and tells you how to profit from them. We have a wide range of financial professionals who write regularly for us, come to our monthly "Roundtable" discussions, and who contribute their expertise to the ongoing MoneyWeek debates. We write articles that we would want to read ourselves.

See All Posts from This Publication