Why We Need Less Government Interference, Not More
Posted on: Aug 5th, 2008 | John Stepek | Filed under International Investing
In the wake of the sub-prime crisis, there’s been a lot of nonsense talked about how the financial markets have proved unable to regulate themselves. Apparently intelligent people have been arguing that what we really need is greater government intervention in the markets.
In case these people hadn’t noticed, governments are already up to their necks in the markets, particularly the ones in the worst trouble. Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE)– the twin financial neutron bombs underpinning the US mortgage sector – are Government Sponsored Entities (GSE) after all. They were created by the US Government to interfere with the property market because at some point the authorities decided that universal home ownership – like full employment – was a desirable goal in itself, regardless of whether people could actually afford a home or not.
Now the very existence of the GSEs threatens to bring down the financial system (you can read more about Fannie and Freddie here: How Fannie and Freddie are pulling the US towards crisis).
These knee-jerk calls for added regulation just show that despite all the talk of Thatcherite revolutions and how we’re all capitalists now, plenty of people still don’t understand how or why markets work.
One very obvious example of this is the constant indulgence of the idea of a windfall tax on energy companies…
How the market system is supposed to work
My colleague David Stevenson wrote about the specific stupidities of a windfall tax on energy on Friday (you can read it here: Why an energy windfall tax is a bad idea). But on a broader note, calls for a windfall tax just show how badly understood markets are. Let’s just clarify roughly how they are supposed to work.
If a good or service becomes expensive, that shows that there’s not enough of it to go around – there’s more demand than supply. The companies involved in the sector then make “excess” profits, or to put it more clearly, they rake it in because they were smart or lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time.
But this happy situation won’t last forever. Just as in the recent housing bubble, everyone else sees them making money hand over fist and decides “I’ll have a piece of that.” Or the company itself realises if it can make and sell more goods, it’ll make even bigger profits. One way or another, supply rises to meet demand, therefore driving down the price.
Source: Why We Need Less Government Interference, Not More
Advertisement
How Drastically Could You Improve Your Investing in Just 2 Months?
Marion from Surrey, British Columbia said “Since I have joined MarketClub I have made $7,000.” Darrin from Minnesota made 159% on his first trade.
Countless other members over 40 countries tell the same story. Their success was thanks to a powerful, simple-to-use investment tool named MarketClub.
With MarketClub you receive access to…
* A proprietary scanning tool that identifies charting patterns primed for large moves.
* The customizable News Scan that lets you set up a scan to find stories on only the markets that you want to know about.
* The Trader's Blog which lets you share ideas with fellow traders along with the MarketClub team. We’ll answer your questions, post tips, share trading ideas, and post online market analysis videos based around MarketClub's methodology and tools.
And much, much more.
The best part is that right now, you can try MarketClub RISK FREE for 2 full months.
John Stepek is Deputy Editor of the UK-based financial weekly MoneyWeek. He is also the editor of daily investment email Money Morning UK. John graduated from Strathclyde University in 1996. He has worked for a number of financial magazines and newsletters including Families in Business, Shares Magazine and The Sunday Times.