Isn’t that a scary thought?

Just a couple of days after Obama touched down in Washington, China makes a very American decree. It’s telling its banks it had better shore up their capital situations or face strong sanctions from the government.

They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. America did it first, now the communists are following.

In case you missed the news over the past year or so, China’s economy is flat-out soaring ahead. While no figure that disseminates from Beijing is ever trusted, most analysts believe the country’s GDP is growing by a rate of 7% or so. Some even say it has eclipsed the 10% mark.

Just like here in the States, very little of that growth is organic. China’s government is just as fond of manipulating natural market forces as our friends inside the beltway.

And, of course, anytime the government gets involved, some unnatural and unexpected economic reverberations will be felt.

Just as their American brethren did over the past decade, China’s banks are taking advantage of a fixed currency and an optimal lending environment by sending all the money they can dig from the couch cushions into the streets of China.

As the economy grows, the leverage on their books multiplies. Like we learned just 13 months ago, the situation will eventually collapse under its own weight.

That’s why Beijing has stepped in and told the banks that they had better save some money for their backup coffers… or else.

This is bad, bad news for a country surviving on borrowed money (no, not us… this time). China’s economy has been artificially inflated by the government’s cash infusions. But now the leadership is starting to pull back, realizing enough is enough.

Continuing with Friday’s lead, this proves natural market forces are still alive and well. Better yet, it proves China is in for some bumpy traveling.

If you would have asked me early last week about China’s economic health, I would have told you I like what I see. But then something odd happened.

Obama visited. And it’s been downhill ever since.

*** I love it when the markets make a mistake. After some positive economic data from the consumer front this morning, the equities market put in quite a showing today. In fact, even the ultra-bearish natural gas sector followed the crowd of bulls today.

It has created another fantastic buying opportunity. Natural gas prices climbed by less than one percent, but much of the sector is up by two or even three times that figure. Investors mistakenly got caught up in the rally.

Over the next few days they are going to pay for it.

Late last week, we locked in gains of 400% thanks to the natural gas market’s recent selloff. Thanks to today’s action, investors that make their move now have yet another shot at triple-digit gains.

To find out how, read my updated report.

This is going to be a fun week for the energy markets.

*** Let’s face it, the dollar is in trouble. But so is the sun at the center of our solar system. The big question is which will implode first. Now that the dollar has slowed its decline, the race may be tighter than you think.

The dollar will eventually be tossed aside, but will it happen in the next million years?

Here’s a bit of what I told Contrarian Profit readers this afternoon:

“Is the drop in the dollar worth watching? Just like the sun will eventually shine its last ray of light, the mighty dollar will someday buy its last barrel of oil or its final container of Chinese imports.

“We all know it is going to happen, so why bother discussing it. Right?

“There is no doubt the world’s currency of choice has more pressure stacked against it than ever before. But even with $12 trillion in debt and nearly a trillion of annual interest payments due within the next decade, the greenback is still stronger than it was just sixteen months ago.

“While so many of us are betting against the dollar and calling for its demise, plenty more investors are using it as a security net, buying American treasuries to protect themselves in case the bottom really falls out.

“With the sun someday going to fade, I could sit in my basement and wait for the big day to come, or I could live my life without worry.

“It’s the same thing with the dollar. We could bet against the greenback and profit as it drops, or we could forget about the minimal return potential and keep our eyes looking forward, where the real money is at.

“Here’s the scoop. The dollar is likely to fade, at most, six percent below today’s value against the Euro. That’s major erosion for such a massively distributed currency, but six percent over a few years doesn’t stack up to a hill of beans in the grand scheme of things.

“I can list a couple of dozen stocks that are up by twice that figure today alone.

“No doubt, you should pay attention to the dollar, as a six-percent decay in the value of the world’s most important currency will change all sorts of valuations. But don’t invest in the cause, invest in the effect.” Keep reading here.

The dollar is going to fall, but you and I may not live long enough to get rich off the move. The smart money is looking somewhere else. I say we follow.

An interview with Marin Katusa, Casey Research

In the past three years, Marin Katusa, senior energy analyst at Casey Research, has become one of the most respected and listened-to authorities in the investment advisory business. He spends the bulk of his time on airplanes and in far-off places studying the future of energy… and the best ways to make money from it.

Brian Hunt, editor in chief of Stansberry’s free online investment digest, The Daily Crux, interviewed Marin to get his take on where oil prices are headed for the long-term… the regions where investors and traders should focus their dollars… and some of his favorite energy companies with massive upside.

The Daily Crux: Marin… we noticed you guys at Casey Research are bullish on energy. Can you explain to us why?

Marin Katusa: Well, as we’ve mentioned in our Casey Energy letters, we’re short-term bears but long-term bulls.

I think there’s a very good chance oil will be knocked back down along with other markets in the short term, but I’d consider that a rare opportunity to buy the best companies at a steep discount. Long term, I’m very bullish on oil because I think the supply of cheap oil is running out.

The days of cheap and easy oil are over. Oil is getting harder and harder to extract because most of the easy-to-find deposits have already been found and extracted.

The best remaining deposits are deep underwater like in the Gulf of Mexico or offshore of Brazil, in state-controlled or politically unstable areas like Iran and Venezuela, or experiencing dramatically falling production like Mexico. There are also huge oil-sands deposits in Canada, but these are more expensive to extract – anywhere from $35-$40 per barrel for existing production, up to $65 or more for new production.

The simple fact is oil prices will eventually rise due to the increased costs involved in meeting existing demand.

On top of that, you’ve got developing countries beginning to significantly increase their own demand. Right now, you’ve got just 30 or so of the world’s most developed countries, known as the OECD, that consume about half of all the oil produced.

As emerging countries like China and India begin to increase their standard of living, they’ll start using a lot more oil. As you guys know, oil consumption per capita is tied very closely to GDP per capita of the country. So this means these emerging countries could be using multiples of the oil that they use now.

Today, China uses just under six barrels of oil per day for every thousand people. In India, it’s about two and a half barrels for every thousand. In the U.S., it’s just under 70 barrels for every thousand. Even if you figure just a 20% increase in China and India per person – those are huge, huge numbers. China alone has over a billion people. This is going to add tremendous upward pressure on prices.

And of course, I’m sure your readers are aware of the long-term threats to the U.S. dollar. Dollar depreciation will only make the problems I just mentioned that much worse.

That said, in the short term, I think oil is very vulnerable to pullbacks in the general stock market. So we’ve been telling our subscribers to be very cautious. In fact, a year ago, I decided to use $40 oil as the basis for all of our analyses for our newsletter. If a company we were looking at wouldn’t be profitable at $40 oil, then we wouldn’t go any further. The logic behind $40 was to provide a real margin of safety should we get the correction in oil I’m expecting.

But it also pushed me to look a lot deeper and be more selective, and it’s really paid off in our results – over 90% of my recommendations over the last year have delivered significant profits for our subscribers.

The funny thing is that by not using $70 or $80 oil, I started getting hate mail from people, saying, “Don’t you know oil’s at $73 and you’re using $40?” It was hilarious, but that’s exactly my point. If a company cannot be profitable at $40 per barrel of oil, it will underperform its peers even when oil is higher. When I use $40 oil and I like the financials – it’s gold.

A good example of this is what we did with Nexen. When I first wrote it up, it was trading at C$23 per share. After doing my analysis, I thought its intrinsic value was less. I said, “Buy under C$16 per share.” Of course, I got people writing in saying I was out of my mind for setting the buy price so low. Just over a month later, it was trading down below C$16 per share, and my subscribers ended up making about 50% within four months on a low-risk company.

So by using $40 oil, I get my true value, rather than the market value. There’s a difference between intrinsic value and the market value, and I go with intrinsic value. I don’t care what people are paying in the market right now. You might not get it today, you might not get it next week. You have to be patient. It’s what I call “stink bid investing.”

Crux: What else do you look for?

Katusa: Another factor I like to look at is what I call game changers. An example of a game changer is what has recently happened to the natural gas sector in the United States. Companies were victims of their own success, because they were so successful in using new technologies to retrieve gas from the shales, they drove the natural gas price down.

Using advanced technologies to discover big offshore deposits is an example of a game changer in oil. But what you’re going to see is a lot of the big finds are going to be drilled by the major oil companies – what I call the super majors – because it’s just so expensive to drill these targets.

Crux: Nobody else has the money.

Katusa: That’s right. So the only frontiers left for conventional oil production that can be extracted easily and cheaply, like I mentioned before, are in politically unstable countries like Iran, Iraq, Libya.

These countries are fully aware of the potential of their resources locked within their borders. They’re increasing the royalties they charge, including the gradual increase in the use of service fee contracts.

We spent a whole issue talking about this in our Casey Energy Report, in the October issue. In countries where the governments hold the ownership of the oil – such as south central Iraq, Kuwait, even potentially Mexico – these are places that you want to watch out for, because they are constitutionally barred from giving foreign oil companies ownership of the oil in the ground. They’re not as positive as people think they are.

A reliable and friendly oil source to the United States, such as the Alberta oil sands, is not cheap to produce. The oil sands require at least $35-$40 per barrel at the very minimum to extract, compared to less than $5 per barrel in places like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Kuwait.

Proven reserves in politically stable parts of the world unfortunately will cost the U.S. consumer a lot more money per barrel. We spent a lot of time in our latest issue of Casey’s Energy Opportunities looking at all of the national oil companies. Of those, you’ve really only got three you can possibly invest in, if you dare.

Crux: How about your take on the likelihood of big takeovers and buyouts? Do you see oil-hungry nations like China coming in to buy up a lot of reserves?

Katusa: Absolutely, but it’s not just going to be the Chinese, it’s also going to be big oil companies who want to replace their production with proven reserves in the ground.

An advantage the Chinese companies will have over the Western oil companies is the Chinese ability to leverage their political and economic muscle in places such as Africa, Venezuela, and Bolivia.

These countries potentially hold world-class oil deposits, but it’s much riskier for a Western company to explore these regions than the powerful Chinese oil companies.

Crux: China is already in a bidding war with ExxonMobil for African oil…

Katusa: Right. What our angle is, if you’re looking to invest in Africa, you’re looking for elephant-size deposits – what they call “world class deposits.”

The company needs to go in with a crew able to maneuver in politically unstable parts of the world. We had a big and fast win on a company called Tanganyika Oil, using just that concept. They went in, they built up production, then sold the company to the Chinese.

We’re doing it again right now on a company called Africa Oil – ticker symbol is AOI on the Toronto Venture Exchange – that’s partnering with the Chinese.

The man behind AOI is the same person behind Tanganyika Oil, Lukas Lundin.

Lukas Lundin, like his father before him, has a long record of going into politically unstable parts of the world and succeeding in developing world-class deposits and selling them at huge gains for the investors. So you’re going to see a lot of this type of partnering going on where the Chinese want the North American expertise, and in return, the Chinese add value by political clout and financial clout, helping to pay the costs of development.

We wrote up Africa Oil as a buy under C$1, and when it popped up to about C$1.50, we told our subscribers to take a Casey Free Ride [a profit-taking strategy] when the stock was trading above C$1.30, and it subsequently went as high as C$1.70. Currently we have AOI as a buy under C$1, and it’s trading at C$0.87, which we view as a very cheap cost for this stock.

Crux: Are there any other countries you’re interested in right now? Are you interested in Iraq?

Katusa: In northern Iraq in the Kurdistan region, there are some good onshore blocks with decent royalty rates.

A company called ShaMaran (ticker symbol is SNM on the Venture Exchange) we think has huge potential. It’s totally cashed up. I wrote it up as a buy under C$0.20 and put two buy signals on it. It’s trading at C$0.57 now. It went as high as C$0.80.

And they’ve got about C$0.25 in cash per share. This was a company that was trading less than cash – they had more cash than the market cap. Our shareholders bought millions of shares, because we were the only ones writing it up. And it had zero interest – there was nothing going on with it. And they’re now in northern Iraq in the area of Kurdistan, which has huge, huge potential.

I’ve also been looking at Colombia. I think that’s a country that people have to pay attention to. In the last month, a lot of the smart money, the big, big players in Vancouver – Frank Giustra and Sam Magid – have been putting huge money, their own personal money, into a bunch of oil plays in Colombia. I would recommend your readers take a look at some Colombia plays. One that I really like is Petroamerica, symbol PTA on the Venture Exchange.

Crux: Great. Any parting thoughts?

Katusa: I think what you have to emphasize to people is to buy at a discount to intrinsic value when it’s unpopular, and sell at market value when it’s popular.

That’s not just being a contrarian. A contrarian is just buying something that’s unpopular. Buy something unpopular that has a great discount to its intrinsic value, and when you sell, sell when it’s popular and trading at the market value, not at its intrinsic value. So those are the two rules that I have.

Crux: Thanks for your time.

Katusa: My pleasure.

As mentioned above, Marin’s track record for profiting in resources like crude oil, natural gas, and uranium is unmatched in the industry.

If you’re interested in reading a monthly analysis on the trends and stocks Marin likes, you can get on board as a Casey Energy Opportunities subscriber for only $39 per year. It’s an incredible deal and completely risk-free, with our 3-month, 100% money-back guarantee. You can learn more about a subscription here.

We all know it is going to happen, so why bother discussing it. Right?

There is no doubt the world’s currency of choice has more pressure stacked against it than ever before. But even with $12 trillion in debt and nearly a trillion of annual interest payments due within the next decade, the greenback is still stronger than it was just sixteen months ago.

While so many of us are betting against the dollar and calling for its demise, plenty more investors are using it as a security net, buying American treasuries to protect themselves in case the bottom really falls out.

With the sun someday going to fade, I could sit in my basement and wait for the big day to come, or I could live my life without worry.

It’s the same thing with the dollar. We could bet against the greenback and profit as it drops, or we could forget about the minimal return potential and keep our eyes looking forward, where the real money is at.

No more Chicken Little

Here’s the scoop. The dollar is likely to fade, at most, six percent below today’s value against the Euro. That’s major erosion for such a massively distributed currency, but six percent over a few years doesn’t stack up to a hill of beans in the grand scheme of things.

I can list a couple of dozen stocks that are up by twice that figure today alone.

No doubt, you should pay attention to the dollar, as a six-percent decay in the value of the world’s most important currency will change all sorts of valuations. But don’t invest in the cause, invest in the effect.

The devaluing of the dollar is no surprise. Even a fifth grader can see what’s ahead over the next decade. That’s why there is so little investment potential directly in the currency. Yet, our stubbornness and human greed will not let our eyes focus on anything but taking advantage of the move.

Let that stuff up to the emotional investors.

While they are focusing on gold and the dollar, investments that will provide double-digit returns at best over the next few years, rational investors need to focus on the many other powerful market forces are at work.

The domestic equities market is a wonderful place to be right now, especially if the dollar is collapsing as fast as we believe it to be.

First, anybody exporting goods will see strong top-line growth as the dollar drops. A six percent fall from our currency equals an automatic six percent surge in revenue growth, without the need for any company to do a thing.

Next, if you are a follower of the green-energy craze, you had better be hoping for a weak dollar. The only thing that will ever wean this country from its dangerous addiction to oil is if crude becomes too expensive relative to our alternatives.

With a dollar that is still in demand across the world, dollar-denominated currencies like crude remain fairly inexpensive. But as Uncle Sam’s reserves dwindle in value, crude prices will move inversely. That is good news for all you folks that took Obama’s advice and invested in the “green” sector.

Finally, the markets run on a risk/reward relationship. The higher the risk, the higher the reward. The lower the risk, the lower the reward. Simple stuff.

If we all know the dollar should weaken, where’s the reward potential? But don’t even begin to think there is no risk in the play.

With Washington in charge, especially the current group of legislators, anything is bound to happen. And now that Obama has is political eye set on “saving the dollar,” the road that lies ahead could be very foggy.

My advice? Watch the dollar. Take note of its moves. But invest in anything but the currency. There is better return potential, with much less risk, elsewhere.

Bill Bonner (The Daily Reckoning, UK Edition):
The Dow fell slightly on Friday. Oil ended the week at $77. The dollar went nowhere.

But gold rose to a new high – $1,146. Today it’s hitting more new highs above $1,160…

Whatever else may be going on, there’s a real bull market in gold. It’s a bull market that began ten years ago. If you’d bought stocks then, you’d have about what you have now… less inflation. If you’d bought gold… you have about 4 times what you had then.

Today, a quick glance at a chart shows gold looking a little toppy. Expect a correction. But remember, this is a bull market. In a bull market, you buy the dips.

Stocks, meanwhile, are in a bear market. In a bear market, you sell the rallies. This looks like a good time to sell – if you haven’t done so already.

“Take Your Gains,” says Forbes. And once you’re out of stocks, stay out until the bear market is over… probably at around 3,000 – 5,000 on the Dow. When the price of gold equals the price of the Dow, it will be time to switch.

We haven’t seen the last of this bull market in gold. It’s what you buy when you think government is making a mess of the monetary situation. You put your trust in gold as an antidote… as protection… as wealth insurance.

Are the feds making a mess of the monetary situation? Oh dear, dear reader… please ask us something harder. Trillion dollar deficits as far as the eye can see… Stimulus spending that turns the US into a Zombie Economy… Handouts to the bankers… gifts to the carry traders…

The feds are out-doing themselves… more below…

As for the bear market on Wall Street, investors are counting on a miracle… a ‘recovery’ that doubles corporate earnings in just a couple years. They think it’s “just like 1982”. Of course, it is just the opposite of 1982… see the table below.

Besides, there is no recovery… and profits will go down, as businesses compete for less spending.

The recovery may be all in your head, writes Robert Shiller, in the New York Times:

“Consider this possibility: after all these months, people start to think it’s time for the recession to end. The very thought begins to renew confidence, and some people start spending again — in turn, generating visible signs of recovery. This may seem absurd, and is rarely mentioned as an explanation for mass behavior late in a recession, but economic theorists have long been fascinated by such a possibility.

“Back in 1931, for example, The New York Times attributed the emerging economic cataclysm to a “mood of pessimism which had been carried to grotesque extremes.” In 1932, it compared reckless talk about “depression” to shouting “fire” in a crowded theater.”

It doesn’t matter what anyone says. It’s a depression. It’s nothing like the garden-variety recessions of the Post-War period.

It’s a depression because of the nature of the work it has to do. It has to clean up 3 decades’ worth of filthy balance sheets.

Click here for the rest of Mr. Bonner’s insightful commentary at The Daily Reckoning, UK Edition.

David Fessler (Investment U):

As the old saying goes, “You’re either a contrarian, or a victim.”

It just so happens that one of the savviest contrarians I know is my colleague, Louis Basenese.

And nobody takes that to heart more than Lou does. I’ve scratched my head in bewilderment on many occasions after reading one of Lou’s bold predictions – only to see his intuition prove uncanny time after time.

So today I’m stealing a page from the “Basenese Playbook” and taking a look at the severely battered transportation sector, one that pretty much everybody hates. However, I think, it’s not only about to come off life support, but perhaps become one of the hottest investments in 2010.

The Transportation Sector: The Market’s Most Important Domain

Airlines, railways, package carriers, even oil and gas pipelines are all industries that make up the transportation sector.

But why should you care about it?

Because transportation is actually the most important sector – and for good reason: growth or contraction here serves as a proxy for both U.S. and global economic growth.

It stands to reason that if more “stuff” is being shipped, it means companies are producing more goods to satisfy business and consumer demand. In turn, this is a good indication that the U.S. economy – and that of the rest of the globe – is in decent shape.

Right now, however, there’s a big change underway in U.S. freight transportation. Thing is though, it’s hardly received any attention. So let’s take a closer look…

And the World’s Most Efficient Transportation System Is…

Let me toss a few statistics your way…

Click here to read the rest of Mr. Fessler’s article at Investment U and uncover his three transportation sector picks.

Now, I don’t care who makes what. That’s between bosses and their worker bees. But I do get a little peeved when Uncle Sam tries to tell some worker he can’t get paid per his contract.

Before you go shouting about how Washington saved Wall Street and therefore we, as taxpayers, get a say over pay, let me ask you this. Does your mortgage company tell you what color to paint little Johnnie’s room? Does your car loan provider tell you how fast to drive? Does your health insurance provider tell control your diet?

Didn’t think so.

If some congressman came barging in this office right now, demanding I slash my pay, his goons would have to hold me back as I try to kick the lunatic’s shins. But if the owner of the company came with the same request, I’d have no choice but to open my wallet (and possibly refresh my resume).

But that’s the way business works. The guys that own the joint make the decisions, not the banks and certainly not government. If the workers don’t like it, they leave. It’s supply and demand and nothing else.

As taxpayers, if we want to be angry about anything, we should be angry that our government used our money to cover somebody else’s dangerous bets.

But now that Goldman shareholders are asking the company’s top brass to reduce the size of the corporate bonus pool and pass the money onto shareholders, the company had better act. If not, the free markets are going to take charge.

Shareholders are going to hit the sell button. Prices will drop. Capital will be reduced. And Goldman executives will be in pinch once again.

That’s the way the business world really works, no matter what Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank want.

When Obama was knocking on the door, Goldman said go away. But now that Mr. Common Shareholder is on the line, next Friday’s paychecks will have a few less zeroes.

Doesn’t that make you feel good? Capitalism is still alive.

***I have my eye on China and its quickly growing, yet fragile, economy.

Earlier today, I wrote a piece for TodaysFinancialNews.com that helps illustrate the potential of the Chinese markets. Instead of nervously awaiting every bit of economic data to hit the Street, savvy international investors are racking up big gains.

Here’s a bit of what I wrote:

You could say it is the tale of two economies. The best of times in Asia, the worst of times here in the States.

While domestic investors wonder when some rogue piece of data will kick out the wobbly legs supporting the top-heavy equities market, savvy Chinese investors are raking in gains from an economy soaring ahead a 7% per year clip.

Where would you rather have your money?

A look at two of today’s winning stocks will help you decide.

Zumiez is a sports-related retailer based in Everett, Washington. With 343 stores in over 30 states, its operations are as exposed to the nation’s economy as it gets. A look at the company’s third-quarter results prove how low our expectations have gotten.

Over the past three months, the $375 million company racked up profits of $5.1 million, down from last year’s corresponding figure of $6.8 million. The earnings-per-share figure of $0.17 beat expectations of $0.15, which helps explain why shares are up by over 10% so far today.

But that’s the only reason investors have to celebrate.

The company’s fourth-quarter expectations leave little room for joy. After booking revenues of $113 million last quarter, the company expects sales of just $122 million to $126 million over the next three months, which include the critical holiday shopping period. Last year’s Q4 was worth sales of $125.

Analysts, which were expecting a figure closer to $131 million, have plenty of reasons to feel disappointed with the news.

Of course, Zumiez is not the only retailer worried about a slower-than-expected fourth quarter. Keep reading here.

*** Finally, I cannot help but smile when I see the Associated Press reporting that gas prices have fallen by more than 15% so far this month. Here’s a hot tip for their reporters: It ain’t over yet!

As you probably know, over at TFN Strategic Trader, we’ve been all over this story. In fact, just yesterday we took profits on one of our four gas-related plays. But we didn’t dump it all. Instead, we sold half of our position, locking in gains of 400%.

Now we’re playing with the house’s money.

Want to know the move that led to these massive gains? Easy… read all about it here.

Lord William Rees-Mogg (Fleet Street Invest UK):
In the last six months there has been a rebound of 50% in the great majority of world stock markets.

There has also been a comparable rebound in the price of oil, with West Texas oil rising very close to $80 a barrel. In the oil market there has been heavy two-way trading in options. There could be a sharp spike in the oil price if speculators have to cover their positions.

At the same time the US dollar has remained weak, and now stands at $1.4886 to the euro and $1.66628 to the pound. This is close to a 14-month low on a trade-weighted basis. The poor performance of the dollar reflects the low US interest rates and the twin US fiscal and trade deficits.

The demise of the dollar

The dollar nevertheless remains the world’s leading reserve currency, with the euro in second place. Investors are naturally anxious to protect themselves against markets, including currency markets, which have shown such a high degree of volatility.

The Chinese, who have the greatest number of dollars in their currency reserves, have already suffered substantial losses.

In what amounts to a crisis of the dollar, the euro is in second place as a reserve currency, but there are potential threats to the future of the euro, due to the weak productivity of the Mediterranean economies. There is a big stretch in productivity growth between the German and the Southern European regions.

The fall in the dollar against other currencies includes a devaluation of the dollar in terms of gold, which now seems to have stabilized at a dollar price of $1,050 an ounce.

The circumstances do indeed appear to be uniquely favourable to gold.

Interest rates and therefore carrying costs are exceptionally low. The dollar is exceptionally weak. The technical market position is strong, including good demand for gold in terms of jewellery. The oil price – which is often linked to gold – is rising. Those who believe that oil is due for a further rise to $100 a barrel are likely also to be confident about holding a proportion of their investment . . .
Click here to read the rest of Lord Rees-Mogg’s article at Fleet Street Invest UK.

Chuck Butler (The Daily Reckoning):
As I checked the currencies throughout the day yesterday, I noticed that as the day went on, the non-dollar currencies were stronger, led by the Big Dog, euro (EUR)… But then late last night, and I mean late last night, I checked them, and those gains had been wiped out.

So, when I arrived here this morning, I had one thing on the top of my list of things to do, and that was to find out what happened… Come on, I said to myself, it had to be more than the “risk on, risk off” stuff that’s been hanging over the markets like the Sword of Damocles! But, when you get right down to the nitty gritty, that’s all it was… For once again, there was some data, or story, or rumor, that spooked the markets into believing the global recovery isn’t going to happen, and the “risk off” came into play.

So what was it that spooked the markets… Well… The only thing I can find was the report yesterday about falling Housing Starts that Chris told you about… Did you know that about 14% of US homeowners were either delinquent on their mortgage or in some stage of foreclosure? That is the highest rate since the group started collecting the data in 1972!

But there was something else that was announced as the day went on, that I think probably spooked the markets more than anything else… And that is a key House panel approved two amendments to a sweeping financial-overhaul bill that would give federal watchdogs new authority to audit the Federal Reserve, and would establish a fund of as much as $200 billion to help dissolve large, troubled institutions. Rep. Ron Paul (R., Texas) offered the amendment seeking to subject the Fed to audits.

The House Financial Services Committee voted 41-28 to approve the amendments, wrapping up weeks of debate but postponing a final vote on the bill until after Thanksgiving.

OK… More deficit spending for sure, and I’m positive that this was “hung on this bill” to audit the Fed as the only way it would get through the gauntlet.
Click here to finish Mr. Butler’s article at The Daily Reckoning.

Don Miller (Money Morning):
The U.S. Federal Reserve may take an unorthodox approach to raising interest rates by paying interest on bank reserves rather than relying on traditional open market remedies, as it exits from its long-term fiscal stimulus programs, Reuters reported today (Tuesday).

Paying interest on reserves is mostly untested and would represent an unexpected twist in the Fed’s response to the financial meltdown.

“In the old days … the Fed controlled the federal funds rate with open market operations,” Antulio Bomfim, a former Fed economist now with Macroeconomic Advisors LLC in Washington told Reuters. “Now, at least in this period when reserves are over-abundant, the way the Fed hopes to raise the federal funds rate will be primarily by raising the interest rate it pays on reserves.”

Usually, when the central bank wants to set a target for the federal funds rate it buys or sells Treasury securities on the open market, influencing interest rates by deploying or withdrawing capital.

By paying interest on reserves, the Fed makes it attractive for banks to keep their money at the central bank as long as interest rates in private markets are lower.

By doing that, the Fed can put a floor under the lending rate that banks charge each other for overnight loans, which is the central bank’s traditional choice for influencing the economy. Open market operations to raise interest rates would be relegated to a supporting role in the initial stages of tightening.

In order to spark an economy mired in deep recession . . . Click here to read the rest of Mr. Miller’s article.

It is becoming more and more apparent that today’s breed of politicians is good at only one thing, getting elected.

As folks that have never run a business, never had to tell an employee to clean off his desk or risk any of their own money, our lawmakers should quit pretending like they know what they are doing and let the hard stuff up to the professionals.

Let ‘em outsource the legislation, I say.

Don’t get me wrong, I love my home state of Pennsylvania, but it is run by a gang of numbskulls. By mid-November they have run out of important things to do and are now searching for ways to keep busy.

The state’s auditor general, Jack Wagner, has decided he no longer wants school districts or local municipalities to have the right to hedge their books.

He calls the notion of entering swaps, “…gambling with public money.”

The so-called financial expert backs up his statement with the fact that a local school district had to spend $12 million in “excessive fees and other charges” to unravel swap contracts it had with Morgan Stanley and JP Morgan.

Wagner failed to mention the many, many times the same contracts saved school districts millions of dollars.

If you’re not familiar with the world of swaps, it is a pretty simple concept that allows you to trade something like variable interest rates for fixed rates. Or, in the case of my graduate finance tests, orange juice futures for pork belly futures.

Ask any finance professional worth his salt and he will tell you he’ll take a fixed interest rate over a variable rate any day. A fixed rate is predictable and can be planned for. A variable rate, on the other hand, can do just about anything.

But when school districts or local municipalities offer bonds, they often have to issue them with variable rates, especially when rates are low.

To protect themselves in case interest rates make a drastic turn in the wrong direction, they call in swap dealers like Morgan Stanley or JP Morgan. With a few strokes of a pen, they can lock in a fixed rate.

Unfortunately, as has been the case across the world, swap contracts that made sense in an environment with climbing interest rates no longer make sense now that investors have access to darn-near-free money.

The schools and towns that were acting responsibly by entering basic swaps are now forced to make larger payouts because their hedges went the wrong way.

And what’s a better way for a wannabe politician to get some votes? Make it look like he’s saving poor, old taxpayers from evil Wall Street financiers.

Idiots.

It is this kind of action that forces CFOs to enter the world of creative accounting. Outside of the commodities industry, I dare you to dig through any company’s 10-K and find the word hedge, swap or derivative.

You’ll be hard-pressed to find it, yet any big firm is most certainly using swaps for protection.

But don’t tell their shareholders. If just one contract goes against them, shareholders tend to revolt, telling executives to stop “gambling” with their money.

Knowing that swaps, futures and option contracts are fantastic way to create predictability and price limits, CFOs continue to enter agreements. They simply call them something else.

Ever seen that line on the balance sheet that says “other”?

That’s your swap.

If a politician, elected or appointed, thinks forcing schools and municipalities out of swap contracts will save taxpayers any money, they are either ignorant fools or lying to you.

*** Speaking of ignorant, Alaska’s Department of Revenue is ready to make a blunder of its own. The organization has an unfunded pension balance of $7.5 billion, a common problem these days.

What’s the 49th state’s solution? It wants to issue a $2 billion bond and invest the proceeds in the equities market. If things go its way and the state earns the market average of 8% annual gains on its equities, it could rake in an extra $40 million annually.

But talk about a gamble.

Right now, the state’s bonds are selling with rates just above 6%. But the department says it won’t consider a bond issue unless the rates are below 5.5%. I sure hope not.

Imagine if you or I walked into a bank these days and said give me ten grand. I’ll pay you back with my stock-market gains.

Unless you got out of a $100,000 car and live in a $2 million mansion, you’d be laughed out of the joint.

Now, it’s easy to argue Alaska has more than enough collateral to back up the bonds. I mean it’s not going bankrupt anytime soon. But the chances of a loss on this “intrastate carry trade” are far too high.

Trying to time this top-heavy market is nearly impossible, especially when it will take nearly two months to get the bond sale lined up.

How’s this for the ultimate proof this is a horrific idea? If the state had made the move lawmakers first approved it just months before last fall’s market collapse, it would have lost hundreds of millions of dollars and would have remained on the hook for a couple of billion bucks.

With investing logic like this, it’s no wonder tax rates are soaring across the country. When it comes to investing, our leaders are clueless.

I’d rather let Madoff invest my money. At least he’d have fun with it.